Being affected from crisis: Case of furniture industry in Turkey

Page created by Ben Gross
 
CONTINUE READING
African Journal of Business Management Vol. 7(1), 78-84, 7 January, 2013
Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM
DOI: 10.5897/AJBM11.123
ISSN 1993-8233 ©2013 Academic Journals

Full Length Research Paper

Being affected from crisis: Case of furniture industry in
                        Turkey
                                                     Mehmet Colak
         Mugla University, Faculty of Technology, Kotekli, 48000, Mugla, Turkey. E-mail: cmehmet@mu.edu.tr.
                                                    Accepted 31 March, 2011

    The objective of the businesses and assets of an open system is to continue to adapt to the
    environment; and their ability to adjust and be affected by the environment and the structure of the sub-
    systems in line with expectations depends on their response to change. Constant change in
    organizational environment and organizations that cannot take the necessary measures against
    environmental influences and balance lead to the creation of hazards. Achievements of businesses,
    made possible largely by seeing and handling of danger in advance, depend on assessments.
    Businesses and environment influence entail various threats and crises which organizations may face.
    Due to the devastating effects of crisis, coping skill of managers, in terms of organization is essential.
    To manage crisis, problems need to be identified in advance, as a way to prevent them from occurring;
    rather than to take steps to limit their consequences. As can be seen it is better to predict and prevent
    crises from occurring or steps should be taken to limit their results, if they cannot be stopped. The
    main problems of the industry in Turkey are financial problems, transportation, lack of domestic and
    imported raw materials, inadequate use of modern and design-focused production, and particularly for
    small- and medium-scale organizations, lack of information about the international markets. In addition,
    the global crisis that shook the world economy in 2001, together with other sectors, deeply affected the
    furniture industry. Furniture industry is affected by a crisis environment, which is what this study aims
    to determine. In this regard, the pre-and post-crisis situations of furniture enterprises crisis may well be
    studied.

    Key words: Furniture industry, crisis, crisis sources, crisis management.

INTRODUCTION

For organizations to survive, they need to follow the rapid       society, legal and political restrictions, and natural
changes and developments taking place in their sectors            disasters such as war, earthquake, and flood (Ergin,
closely. In today’s world, with the effects of globalization,     1992).
the competition has become more severe than it was                  Every type of crisis can lead to spontaneous distortion
before and the uncertainty has increased to the highest           of the interaction between humans, technology and other
level (Arikboga, 2001). Such severe competition and high          elements of the organization. First of all, crisis is a state
level of uncertainty sometimes provide organizations with         which is unexpected and not easy to detect by the
threats and sometimes with opportunities (Uslu, 1999).            organization. There may be some signals of crisis. Yet,
Apart from natural disasters, crises emerge as a result of        what is important at that point is that the organization
the interaction among technology, human behaviors and             should be able to recognize the signals and take
organizational culture (Tutar, 2000). External factors            measures to avert a crisis by displaying great sensitivity
believed to be one of the elements causing crises can             towards environmental changes (Tutar, 2000).
include factors related to economic system such as                  Crisis can be described as the state of tension which
economic fluctuations and irregularities, mismatching             can not be expected in advance, should be responded
supply and demand; technological developments, chan-              fast, threat existing values, goals and predictions of the
ges in the expectations, values and living styles of the          organization by making the avoidance and adjustment
Colak          79

mechanisms of the organization inadequate. The con-               advance and eliminating them (Anonymous 3, 2009).
cepts such as stress, anxiety, panic etc are the                    The issue of crisis management is of great importance
representatives of the emotions experienced in a crisis           for organizations because when it can be fully exploited,
period (Tagraf and Arslan, 2003). There are different             organization can be ready for unexpected events and
definitions of crisis provided in the literature. Some            minimize their losses in crisis periods. On the other hand,
definitions define crisis as lack of adequacy to intervene        with the employment of crisis management by organi-
in a threatening condition. Some authors emphasized the           zations, they can be ready for crises, their employees can
necessity and priority of coping with unexpected                  more easily cope with the negative impacts of crisis
conditions while defining the concept of crisis. On the           conditions, minimize their time losses and the most
other hand, in the generally agreed definition of crisis, it is   importantly, the existence of the organization is not
seen as a situation threatening the existence of the              threatened (Anonymous 4, 2010).
organization (Can, 1994).
   In theory, crisis can be defined as a state of tension
which cannot be expected in advance, should be res-               Purpose of the study
ponded fast, threat existing values, goals and predictions
of the organization by making the avoidance and                   The demand for furniture has greatly increased in Turkey
adjustment mechanisms of the organization inadequate              as a result of population increase, urbanization and
(Anonymous 1, 2010). What is primarily important for              improved living standards. In this respect, the furniture
organizations is not to look for the ways of coping with a        sector should be reshaped with a new view that can
crisis when it has already began but to develop a                 recognize the necessities of the age. Today, Turkish
managerial structure that can predict that a crisis is            furniture industry mostly consists of small-scale
coming and can make use of the crisis conditions to               organizations using traditional production methods.
make the organization more successful and give a new              However, particularly within the last 15 to 20 years, the
momentum to the processes of the organization                     number of the middle- and large-scale organizations has
(Vergiliel, 2001).                                                increased. Today, there are nearly 60,000 organizations
   For a new situation emerging to be defined as a crisis,        in the furniture industry and the number of the employees
it should have the following characteristics (Akat and            is nearly 260,000. The important centers of furniture
Budak 1999).                                                      production are; Istanbul, Ankara, Bursa (Inegol), Kayseri,
                                                                  Izmir and Adana.
a. Crisis represents a sudden change that can not be                 The main problems of the industry in Turkey are
sensed in advance;                                                financial problems, transportation, lack of domestic and
b. The state of crisis cannot be predicted;                       imported raw materials, inadequate use of modern and
c. Crisis should be responded to fast and urgently. The           design-focused production, and particularly for small- and
managers can not respond to a crisis with their standard          medium-scale organizations, lack of information about
decision making mechanisms;                                       the international markets. In addition, the global crisis
d. Crisis threatens the goals and existence of an                 shaking the world economy in 2001, together with the
organization (Yeniceri, 1993);                                    other sectors, deeply affected the furniture industry. The
e. As a crisis cannot be overcome with the standard               purpose of the present study is to determine the extent to
decision making mechanisms, it requires urgent                    which the furniture industry was affected from the crisis.
intervention and this may lead to tension on the part of
managers (Can, 1994).
                                                                  MATERIALS AND METHOD
“Crisis management” can be defined as the construction
                                                                  Materials
of an effective structure to avoid a potential crisis. That is,
it can be defined as prevention of the elements that can          In this context, pre- and post-crisis states of the furniture
lead to a crisis by predicting them in advance or                 organizations located in Istanbul, Ankara, Bursa, Kayseri, Izmir,
minimization of the negative impacts. We can clarify this         Samsun, Mugla, Kars were investigated in this study.
with a simile. Crisis is like a virus inhabiting a weak body.        The reasons for the selected organizations operating in the
                                                                  furniture sector as the survey area of the present study are listed
Its effect on our body is in reverse correlation with the
                                                                  below:
strength of our body. It can make you sick or make your
immune system stronger like a vaccination (Anonymous              (a.) The importance of furniture industry has increased in this
2, 2009).                                                         century and it is expected to increase more in the future,
   Crisis management is a process where crisis signals            (b.) Furniture industry realized the 1% of all the export in the year
are received and evaluated and required measures for              2009; that is, 1 billion dollars of the total 100 billion dollars and its
                                                                  contribution is expected to increase in the future,
organization to minimize its losses are taken. Crisis             (c.) Furniture sector has positive contributions to the development
management covers a long process. The most important              of other related sectors,
element in this process is predicting occurrences in              (d.) Firms operating in furniture sector believe that such studies will
80        Afr. J. Bus. Manage.

be great contribution to the sector.                                   teams. The organizations increased overtime working
                                                                       hours during the crisis. Following the crisis, in order to
                                                                       overcome the adverse affects of the crisis, the
Method
                                                                       organization put greater emphasis on their advertisement
The empirical data of the present study were collected through
                                                                       efforts and decreased their promotion expenditures. High
interview and questionnaire methods. Using more than one data          majority of the organizations used marketing strategies in
collection tool is argued to improve the reliability of the findings   their sales, attempted to reduce the expenditures and
(Seyidoglu, 1995). The reason why the questionnaire technique          encouraged their workers and sale offices to work more
was selected is that it makes collecting large amount of data in a     efficiently to minimize the adverse affects of the crisis.
short time possible (Kuheylan, 1989). The questionnaire was
                                                                       Most of the organizations motivated their workers against
administered in face to face interviews to the managers of the
organizations. There are 55 questions concerning the pre-crisis        the crisis.
state and 47 questions concerning the post-crisis sate. Totally 49       More than half of the organizations were able to predict
organizations were administered the questionnaire and the findings     the crisis in advance and their perception of a crisis as a
are presented in Table 1.                                              threat weakened after the crisis. Nearly half of the
                                                                       organizations view a possible crisis environment as an
                                                                       opportunity. Moreover, most of the organizations see the
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                                 other organizations working in the same sector in the
                                                                       same region as a threat. The main factors viewed to be
What should be done by organizations is to get ready for               the causes of a crisis are human factors, organizational
a crisis and the adverse effects it will create, take the              infrastructures, affective factors, technical factors, and
required measures, develop pre-emptive alert systems,                  competitive environment. The organizations consider
manage the chaotic situation to be created by a crisis                 their post-crisis performances as not good. In the
successfully and minimize the effect of a crisis. The                  determination of the investments, having profit is the
required measures should be planned by organizations                   strongest factor and this is followed by necessities. In
within the framework of “crisis management” before a                   crisis period, the organizations attempt to reduce the
crisis starts. Special attention should be taken not to                expenditures rather than manipulate the production.
destroy the future of the organization just to save the day.           While 56% of the organizations do not think that the
   Following the crisis, though no change occurred in the              measures taken by the state are not adequate, 44% of
functioning area of the furniture organizations, the                   them think that they are sufficient.
number of their employees decreased and this led to                      In a crisis period, overcoming the adverse affects of the
reduction in the size of the organizations. This holds                 crisis depends on revising the targets, finding the suitable
particularly true for the small-scale organizations. The               way on time to minimize the losses caused by the crisis
number of the personnel consisting of university                       by analyzing the strategies and policies. In a crisis period,
graduates did not change much. However, 25% of the                     every moment and decision are of great importance.
organizations think of changing their sector.                          Managerial hesitations and panic atmosphere in the
   While recruiting new personnel following the crisis, the            management, chain decision making and approach
recruiting decisions were mostly based on necessity. The               selection mistakes may lead to emergence of mistakes
organizations preferring the registered workers before the             that can harm the organization.
crisis somehow changed their preferences favoring the
recruiting of unregistered workers following the crisis.
While there was no decrease in the number of the                       Conclusion
insured workers employed by the large-scale organiza-
tions, there was a decrease in the small-scale organi-                 First, existing conditions (both external and internal)
zations. While the number of the uninsured workers                     should be well analyzed so that the question “what is our
employed by the small- and medium-scale organizations                  position?” can be clearly answered. Here, economic
increased, there was no uninsured worker in the large-                 factors, the state of the sector, existing market conditions
scale organizations. The number of the organizations                   and other external factors should be analyzed well.
requiring a qualification certificate from their workers               Moreover, internal analysis should be carried out to
decreased after the crisis. The wage of the workers is                 determine the strengths and weaknesses of the organi-
mostly determined by qualifications and performance.                   zation. Moreover, opportunities and threats should be
   The number of the foremen and unqualified workers                   clearly determined and measures should be taken to turn
increased after the crisis but no significant change was               the crisis into an opportunity. In short, strategies and
observed in the number of the managers. While the                      plans should be revised and necessary adjustments
number of the employees working for minimum wage in                    should be made. In an environment of increasing com-
large-scale organizations increased, their number de-                  petition, “operational efficiency” is of great importance but
creased in the small-scale organizations. Small decrea-                it becomes vital in crisis periods.
ses were observed in the amount of the export.                            Measures that can improve the efficiency and savings
   Large-scale organizations formed crisis management                  should be immediately put into effect. Saving does not
Colak   81

Table 1. The pre-crisis and the post-crisis situation of enterprises.

                                                                        Pre-crisis    Post-crisis
  Parameter
                                                                        f       (%)   f     (%)
 Scale of the organization
 Small                                                                   8     16.6   25   52.09
 Medium                                                                 17     35.5   15   31.25
 Large                                                                  23     47.9   8    16.66
 The number of the employees
 5-10                                                                   15     31.5   13   27.08
 11-20                                                                  12      25    19   39.58
 21-30                                                                   7     14.5   5    10.41
 31-40                                                                   7     14.5   2    4.18
 41 and more                                                             7     14.5   9    18.75
 The number of the university graduate employees
 0-2                                                                    24      50    25   52.08
 3-4                                                                    11     22.9   10   20.85
 5-6                                                                     5     10.4   6    12.5
 7-8                                                                     6     12.5   5    10.41
 9 and more                                                              2     4.2    2    4.16

 The number of the insured employees
 0-10                                                                   19    39.59   15   31.25
 11-20                                                                  12      25    20   41.68
 21-30                                                                   3     6.25   5    10.41
 31-40                                                                   6     12.5   0      0
 41 and more                                                             8    16.66   8    16.66

 The number of employees working without
 insurance
 0-10                                                                   38    79.16   41   85.42
 11-20                                                                  10    20.84   6    12.5
 21-30                                                                   0      0     5    10.41
 31-40                                                                   0      0     0      0
 41 and more                                                             0      0     1    2.08
 The number of the foremen
 0-2                                                                    10     20.8   15   31.25
 3-4                                                                    15     31.4   18   37.5
 5-6                                                                    10     20.8   7    14.59
 7-8                                                                     7     14.5   8    16.66
 9 and more                                                              6     12.5   0      0
 The number of unqualified employees
 0-10                                                                   28    58.37   30   62.5
 11-20                                                                  10     20.8   13   27.08
 21-30                                                                   7    14.58   3    6.25
 31-40                                                                   3     6.25   0      0
 41 and more                                                             0      0     2    4.17
 The number of the managers
 0-2                                                                    30     62,5   32   66,66
 3-4                                                                    10     20.8   10   20.8
 5-6                                                                     6     12.5   5    10.41
 7-8                                                                     2     4.2    1    2.08
 9 and more                                                              0      0     0      0
82   Afr. J. Bus. Manage.

            Table 1. Contd.

              Percentage of export in the production
              1-10%                                                    26   54.17   24    50
              11-20%                                                    9   18.75   12    25
              21-30%                                                    3    6.25   2    4.16
              31-40%                                                    4    8.33   3    6.25
              41% and more                                              6    12.5   7    14.59

              Percentage of import in the production
              1-10%                                                    25   52.09   24    50
              11-20%                                                   14   29.19   15   31.25
              21-30%                                                    2    4.16   1    2.08
              31-40%                                                    2    4.16   5    10.42
              41% and more                                              2    4.16   7    6.25

              Measures taken for a crisis
              Yes                                                      33   68.8    30   62.5
              No                                                       15   31.2    18   37.5

              Strategies developed to make a crisis an
              opportunity
              Advertisement                                             8   16.66   16   33.33
              Reduction                                                15   31.25   15   31.25
              Incentive                                                 8   16.66   9    18.75
              Promotion                                                 9   18.75   5    10.42
              Others                                                    8   16.66   3    6.25

              The number of the organization improving their
              facilities and commercial relationships as a result of
              the economic developments
              Yes                                                      30   62.5    24    50
              No                                                       18   37.5    24    50

              The number of the employees working with
              minimum wage
              0-10                                                     25   52.08   21   43.75
              11-20                                                    14   29.16   19   39.59
              21-30                                                     4    8.3    4    8.33
              31-40                                                     4    8.3    1    2.08
              41 and more                                               1    2.08   3    6.25

              The number of the organizations having crisis
              management teams
              Yes                                                      12    25     17   35.41
              No                                                       36    75     31   64.58

              The method used to determine the wages
              According to performance                                  6    12.5   7    14.58
              Minimum wage                                             13   27.09   10   20.84
              According to qualification                               27   56.25   31   64.58
              Others                                                    2    4.16   0      0
              Preferences for employing the workers
              The organization preferring to employ unregistered
                                                                       3    6.29    8    16.66
              workers
              The organizations preferring to employ insured workers   39   81.2    33   68.75
              The organizations preferring to employ daily workers      2   4.18    2    4.18
              Others                                                    4   8.33    5    10.43
Colak   83

Table 1. Contd.

 The organizations requiring qualification certificate
 for recruiting
 Yes                                                     35   72.9    32   66.66
 No                                                      13   27.1    16   33.34

 The organizations regarding a crisis as a threat to
 the organization
 Yes                                                     26   54.16   29   60.42
 No                                                      22   45.84   19   39.58

 Are the organizations working in the same sector in
 the same region a threat?
 Yes                                                     26   54.16   29   60.42
 No                                                      22   45.84   19   39.58

 The organizations using marketing strategies in the
 sale of their products
 Yes                                                     26   54.16   32   66.66
 No                                                      22   45.84   16   33.34

 Labor preferences for the production
 Cheap labor                                              3    6.25   6    12.5
 Qualified labor                                         24     50    25   52.08
 Both of them                                            21   43.75   17   35.42

 Preferences for the way of collecting returns
 Cash                                                     9   18.75   8    16.66
 Installments                                             9   18.75   11   22.91
 Both of them                                            28   58.33   26   54.18
 Others                                                   2    4.17   3    6.25

 Product storage
 Yes                                                     30   62.5    29   60.42
 No                                                      18   37.5    19   39.58

 Customer satisfaction
 Yes                                                     47   97.92   44   91.7
 No                                                       1    2.08   4     8.3

 Warranty period for the products
 Yes                                                     40   83.33   39   81.25
 No                                                       8   16.67   9    18.75

 The number of the shareholders
 Yes                                                     22   45.84   25   52.08
 No                                                      26   54.16   19   39.58

 Investment decisions
 Profit                                                  24    50     27   56.25
 Necessity                                               24    50     21   43.75

 The performance of the organization in the last year
 Very good                                                2    4.14   2    4.14
 Good                                                    17   35.45   8    16.66
 Not bad                                                 25   52.08   20   41.66
 Bad                                                      4    8.33   18   37.5
84      Afr. J. Bus. Manage.

only mean lying of the workers but also increasing the          media, and different cultures etc. Though usually there is
efficiency of business process and making better use of         no response within the few hours following the break-out
technologies. Even improvements in stock management             of a crisis, these few hours are vital in determining the
can lead to significant savings. In a crisis environment,       destiny of the organization. It is important to be able to
cash management exhibits greater importance. Cash               predict the worst and decide what to do before, while and
management should be followed more closely and means            after the crisis and to communicate them to the public.
should be sought to improve its efficiency.                     This is only possible when detailed preparations are
   During the crisis management process, the managers           made for a possible crisis. Correct selection of the
should have some specific skills. For organizations to be       location of the production, proper market analysis, proper
successful, human factor and team work are of great             selection of the technologies to be used, selection of the
importance. The workers should be able to focus on how          personnel with required qualifications etc. are important
they can contribute to their organization rather than on        to avert a possible crisis.
their concerns about being unemployed. Motivation
should be kept high, and special emphasis should be put
on the importance of every worker’s making the required         REFERENCES
effort. If there is a need for sacrifice, this should be
                                                                Akat I, Budak G (1999). Business Management. Barıs Publishing. Izmir.
equally shared among the workers.                               Anonymous           1        (2010).     www.kobifinans.com.tr/tr/bilgi_
   As a result of urbanization, population growth,                 merkezi/02061001/20892
developing living standards, the demand for furniture in        Anonymous        2    (2009).   www.danismend.com/konular/stratejiyon/
                                                                   krizyonetimi.html.
Turkey has greatly increased. In this respect, the furniture
                                                                Anonymous 3 (2009). www.priciturkey.com / kriz.html
industry in the country has been shaping itself in line with    Anonymous 4 (2010). www.priciturkey.com
the contemporary developments in the world. As a result,        Arıkboga S (2001). Business Management in Crisis Environment. J.
today’s contemporary organizations must administer                 Economics. 410-411(February March).
                                                                Can H (1994). Organization and Management. Siyasal Ofset. Ankara.
crisis management to be able survive and reach their            Ergin E (1992). Business Policies, Der Publishing. Istanbul.
goals in a crisis environment. For this to be achieved, first   Kuheylan S (1989). Research Methods. D.E.U. Faculty of Economics
effective crisis management system should be esta-                 and Administrative Sciences Publishing. Izmir.
blished in the organization. However, crisis management         Seyidoglu H (1995). Scientific Research and Writing Manual. Guzem
is not adequate on its own. For a crisis management                Publishing. Istanbul.
                                                                Tagraf H, Arslan NT (2003). Crisis Emergence Process and A Pro-
system to function effectively there is a need for some            active Approach to Crisis Management. C.U. J. Economics and
managerial skills and for managers to take respon-                 Administrative Sciences. 4(1).
sibilities. In a world where rapid changes and increasing       Tutar H (2000). Management in Crisis and Stress Environment. Hayat
                                                                   Publishing.14. Istanbul.
ambiguity have been observed, more political, economic
                                                                Uslu A (1999). Strategic Marketing and Management in the Periods of
and legal complexities have been observed particularly in          Economic Crisis and Consumer Behaviors. M.U. J. Economics and
developing countries like Turkey. It is a fact that in             Administrative Sciences. XV(1).
today’s world, organizations need crisis management             Vergiliel TM (2001). Crisis and Business Management. Alfa Ofset.
                                                                   Bursa.
information more than ever. Otherwise, the organizations        Yeniceri O (1993). Management, Organization and Behavior in
that can not comply with the external factors will have            Companies. Tutibay Publishing. Ankara.
great difficulties in surviving. It is a vital importance to
have a healthy communication for every organization.
Hence, organizations need to have adequate information
about psychology, risk evaluation, history, relations with
You can also read