Building a TD Securities Mining Conference
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Building a TD Securities Mining Conference
Low-Cost Mid-Tier January 22, 2020
TSX:TGZ / OTCQX:TGCDF West African Gold ProducerForward-Looking Statements
All information included in this presentation, including any information as to the future financial or operating performance and other statements of Teranga Gold Corporation (“Teranga”) that express
management’s expectations or estimates of future performance, other than statements of historical fact, constitute forward-looking information or forward-looking statements within the meaning of
applicable securities laws and are based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date hereof. Forward-looking statements are included for the purpose of providing information about
management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Wherever possible, words such as “plans”, “expects”, “scheduled”, “trends”, “indications”, “potential”, “estimates”, “predicts”,
“anticipate”, “to establish”, “believe”, “intend”, “ability to”, or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, “will”, or are "likely" to be taken, occur or be achieved, or
the negative of these words or other variations thereof, have been used to identify such forward-looking information. Specific forward-looking statements include, without limitation, all disclosure
regarding future results of operations, economic conditions and anticipated courses of action. Although the forward-looking statements contained herein reflect management's current beliefs and
reasonable assumptions based upon information available to management as of the date hereof, Teranga cannot be certain that actual results will be consistent with such forward-looking
information. Such assumptions include, among others, the ability to obtain any requisite governmental approvals, the accuracy of mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, gold price,
exchange rates, fuel and energy costs, future economic conditions, anticipated future estimates of free cash flow, courses of action, the anticipated impact of combining the two assets, including
anticipated synergies, and the potential for the combined Sabodala-Massawa complex to become a top tier gold asset. Teranga cautions you not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-
looking statements.
The economic analysis presented in the Massawa Technical Report was prepared by Barrick in respect of its feasibility study for a standalone development plan and proposed mining operation at
Massawa. Readers are advised that the economic outcomes disclosed by Barrick are presented in order to provide the reader with context regarding the Massawa project as proposed to be
developed by Barrick. However, readers are cautioned that as Teranga proposes to process the Massawa deposits at its existing Sabodala Project, the economic analysis presented in the Massawa
Technical Report should not be considered as representing the economic outcome stemming from an integrated Sabodala-Massawa mining complex.
The risks and uncertainties that may affect forward-looking statements include, among others, the inherent risks involved in exploration and development of mineral properties, including government
approvals and permitting, changes in economic conditions, changes in the worldwide price of gold and other key inputs, changes in mine plans and other factors, such as project execution delays,
many of which are beyond the control of Teranga. For a more comprehensive discussion of the risks faced by Teranga, and which may cause the actual financial results, performance or
achievements of Teranga to be materially different from estimated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by forward-looking information or forward-looking statements,
please refer to Teranga’s latest Annual Information Form filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities at www.sedar.com or on Teranga’s website at www.terangagold.com. The risks
described in the Annual Information Form (filed and viewable on www.sedar.com and on Teranga’s website at www.terangagold.com) are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Teranga
disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Nothing herein should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy or sell Teranga securities.
This presentation is dated as of January 8, 2020. All references to Teranga include its subsidiaries unless the context requires otherwise. This presentation contains references to Teranga using the
words “we”, “us”, “our” and similar words and the reader is referred to using the words “you”, “your” and similar words.
2Historical Resource Estimate – Massawa Gold Project
Massawa was discovered by Randgold Resources Limited, which merged with Barrick effective January 1, 2019. On July 23, 2019, Barrick voluntarily filed a technical report under National
Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project, Senegal (the “Massawa Feasibility Study”). The Massawa
Feasibility Study disclosed mineral resource statements as well as mineral reserve estimates as of December 31, 2018, which remain current for Barrick as of the date hereof. As the mineral
resource and mineral reserve estimates pre-date Teranga’s agreement to acquire Massawa, Teranga is treating them as “historical estimates” under NI 43-101, but they remain relevant as the most
recent mineral resource and reserves estimates for Massawa. Further drilling and resource modelling would be required to upgrade or verify these historical estimates as current mineral resources
or reserves for the combined Sabodala-Massawa Complex and accordingly, they should be relied upon only as a historical resource and reserve estimate of Barrick, which pre-dates Teranga’s
agreement to acquire Massawa. A Teranga “Qualified Person” under 43-101 has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves for the
combined Sabodala-Massawa Complex and Teranga is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.
Third Party Information
This presentation includes market and industry data which was obtained from various publicly available sources and other sources believed by Teranga to be true. Although Teranga believes this
information to be reliable, Teranga has not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources referred to in this presentation, or analyzed or verified the underlying reports relied upon or
referred to by such sources, or ascertained the underlying assumptions relied upon by such sources. Teranga does not make any representation as to the accuracy of such information.
Other Notes & Disclaimers
ALL DOLLAR AMOUNTS ARE DENOMINATED IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.
3Creating a Low-Cost Mid-Tier Gold Producer Mining-Friendly West Africa
Wahgnion Gold Mine(6)
Standalone Stage
Achieved commercial
Sabodala Gold Mine(1)
production November 1, 2019
Stage
2019 Production†
Production
47,492 oz Au(7)
Senegal
2019 Production Niger 2019 AISC/oz* Guidance
241,276 oz Au(2)
$750-$825/oz Au
2019 AISC/oz* Guidance Mali
$825-$900/oz Au Burkina Faso 2P Reserves
1.6Moz @ 1.61 g/t Au(8)
2P Reserves
2.4Moz @ 1.35 g/t Au(3)
Guinea
Golden Hill Project
Standalone Stage
Benin
Massawa Project(4) Sierra
Leone Ghana
Togo Exploration/PFS
Stage Indicated Resource
Development Côte d’Ivoire 415koz @ 2.02 g/t Au(9)
Liberia Inferred Resource
Years 1-10 Average Production
203koz Au/year 644koz @ 1.68 g/t Au(9)
Historical 2P Reserves
2.6Moz @ 3.94 g/t Au(5)
West African Birimian Greenstone Belt Miminvest & Afema
Stage
Refer to Endnotes (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) in the Appendix.
*Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix. Early Exploration
†Life of mine initial 5-year average of 132koz Au per year. 4Strong Organic Growth Pipeline
Anticipated to transform Teranga Moving to
into a low-cost, mid-tier gold producer Feasibility
Pro Forma Increasing
Sabodala- Production,
Massawa
Complex
Wahgnion
Gold Mine
Golden Hill
Project
Miminvest &
Afema JVs
Exploration
& Resource
EBITDA*,
Senegal Burkina Faso Burkina Faso Côte d’Ivoire Conversion Earnings
& Cash Flow
*Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix.
55Sabodala: Largest Gold Producer in Senegal Diadiako Gora
2.4Moz 4.1Moz 13-Year
2P Reserves M&I Resources Mine Life(1)
at 1.35 g/t Au(3) at 1.56 g/t Au(3)
Sabodala
Masato
Mamasato
Soukhoto Niakafiri
Strong 5-Year Profile with Potential to Increase Mine Life Niakafiri East Kouroundi
West
Golouma
Life of Mine Summary(10) 5 Years Maki North
Kerekounda
Kourouloulou
2018-2022 Medina Golouma
West Golouma South
Kobokoto Koulouqwinde
Annual production(11) 213koz Goumbati
West Koutoniokollo
All-in sustaining costs* $885/oz Kinemba East
Total free cash flow*(12) $230M
Another Strong Year in 2019
Sabodala Gold Mine (Open Pit)
2019 Guidance Actual Senegal, West Africa
Permitted mining license: 291 km2
Production 215-230koz(2) 241koz(2)
*Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix
Refer to Endnotes (1),(2),(3),(10),(11) and (12) in the Appendix 8+2.0Moz of Gold Produced at Sabodala Since IPO in December 2010
Exceeded the Higher End of 2019 Production Guidance On Track To Meet Lower End of Cost Per Ounce Guidance
(Koz Au)
Nine months ended 2019
September 30 Consolidated
Guidance
$/oz Au sold 2018 2019 (Except for Cash
Costs)
Cost of sales $928 $993 $1,050 - $1,125
241 Total cash costs* (Sabodala only) $650 $677 $725 - $775
233 245
214 207 212 217
182
All-in sustaining costs* $972 $991 $1,000 - $1,100
131
Cash/(non-cash) inventory movements
($52) ($87) ($100)
17 and amortized advanced royalty costs
(2)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
All-in sustaining costs (excluding
cash/(non-cash) inventory movements $920 $904 $900- $1,000
and amortized advanced royalty costs)*
*Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix 9
Refer to Endnote (2) in the AppendixSenegal
Transformational Acquisition: High-Grade Massawa Project Map
View
Mali
One of the highest-grade undeveloped open-pit gold projects in Africa(13)
Sabodala
+4Mtpa
Significant opportunity for operating & capital synergies and value creation(14) CIL Plant
30km
FROM THE
PLANT
Sabodala-Massawa Complex anticipated to create a top tier gold asset
Bambaraya
Delya
Pro forma Teranga to transform into a low-cost, mid-tier gold producer Massawa
Gold Project Tina
Sofia
Massawa
Tablo and Barrick supportive of the transaction through equity investments (CZ & NZ)
Current TGZ P/NAV of ~0.6x compared to select African peers at ~0.9x(15)
Senegal, West Africa
Sabodala Mine (920km2) &
Massawa Project (~600km2)
Map not drawn to scale. 11
Refer to Endnotes (13), (14) and (15) in the Appendix.Compelling Acquisition Rationale
Massawa project hosts one of Africa’s highest-grade undeveloped open-pit gold projects(13)
Total historical mineral reserves of 2.6Moz @ 3.94 g/t Au(5)
High-Grade
Robust economics on a standalone basis as per Barrick’s July 2019 Massawa Feasibility Study
Massawa Project
After-tax NPV5% of $677 million and IRR of 41% (at $1,400/oz gold price; $1,200/oz pit shell)(4)
Exploration opportunity on large prospective land package
Proximity of Massawa project to Sabodala‘s mill and infrastructure (within 30 km) provides opportunity for capex/opex synergies(14)
– Reduces phase 1 and phase 2 capex for standalone mill and infrastructure
Synergies &
– Minimal infrastructure development anticipated to initiate mining at Massawa project and process free-milling ore at Sabodala
Value Creation
Targeting near-term higher production and lower costs at pro forma Sabodala-Massawa complex with an optimized mine schedule
to be defined in technical studies
Priority mining of higher-grade ore from Massawa project with first gold production targeted for H2 2020
Building the Newest
Pro forma Teranga anticipated to transition to a low-cost, mid-tier gold producer – as a result, cash margins and free cash
Low-Cost, Mid-Tier flows* are expected to increase commensurate with the increased production
Gold Producer Teranga will continue to progress its attractive organic pipeline, including Golden Hill – an advanced exploration project
Accelerates Teranga’s repositioning as a low-cost mid-tier West African gold producer
Teranga Re-Rate The Massawa project’s historical mineral reserves base of 2.6Moz from 20.9Mt at 3.94 g/t (5) is expected to augment Sabodala’s
current mineral reserves base of 2.4Moz from 55.7Mt at 1.35 g/t (3)
Opportunity
Current TGZ P/NAV of ~0.6x compared to select African peers at ~0.9x(15) *Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix.
Refer to Endnotes (3), (4), (5), (13), (14) and (15) in the Appendix. 12Transaction Summary
Teranga has entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which it will acquire a 90% interest in the Massawa Gold
Project from a wholly-owned subsidiary of Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”) and Compagnie Sénégalaise de
Transaction Transports Transatlantiques Afrique de l’Ouest SA (“CSTTAO”) (collectively, the “ Vendors”)
Upfront consideration of $380 million in the form of $300 million in cash and $80 million in common shares
‒ $225 million will be funded by existing lender Taurus Funds Management, including $25 million to be provided by Barrick
Consideration ‒ Balance to be funded through a private placement to the Vendors and a public offering
Additional gold price-linked contingent payments of either nil, $25 million, $35 million, or $50 million due the later of the three years
following completion of Transaction or January 31, 2023(16)
Closing is subject to receipt of the Massawa exploitation license, residual exploration license, and other consents from the Government
of Senegal including Teranga’s integration plans for the Sabodala-Massawa Complex
Conditions Transaction is also conditional upon the closing of Teranga’s concurrent debt financing, prospectus financing and private placement
financing, each of which are also inter-conditional
No shareholder vote required
Transaction announced on December 10, 2019
Timeline Bought deal equity offering closed on December 18, 2019
Transaction expected to close in Q1 2020
Tablo, controlled by Teranga director David Mimran, expected to invest $45 million to retain 21.2% ownership on
a pro forma basis
Other Terms
Barrick expected to hold a 11.45% ownership in Teranga (pro forma basis) and is entitled to nominate one member to
the Company’s board of directors so long as it retains 10% equity ownership 13
Refer to Endnote (16) in the Appendix.Massawa: One of the Highest-Grade Undeveloped Open-Pit Gold Projects in Africa
Reserve Grade vs. Contained Gold (Open Pit, >1.5 Moz Au Reserve and 100% Basis)
Reserve Grade (g/t Au)
10.0 Massawa project grade
3.94
2.6x 3.5x
9.0
Ahafo
8.0 1.51
Reserve Contained Metal (Moz Au)
1.11
Tasiast
7.0
6.0 Massawa Producing Development
Tarkwa Median Median
5.0
4.0 Essakane Sadiola Hill
Fekola
3.0 Ity
Block 14 Loulo-Gounkoto
Siguiri Hounde
2.0 Sabodala Lefa Akyem
Bissa Damang
Massawa Project
Bouly Navachab
Bombore Iduapriem Yaoure Mana
1.0
Wahgnion
0.0
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50
Reserve Grade (g/t Au)
Producing Asset Development Asset Teranga Asset 14
Source: Publically filed information by each Company.
Note: Reserves shown exclusive of any underground deposits.Robust Standalone Massawa Project Economics(4)
Pit Shell Gold Standalone Net Present Value (5%) Gold Price Sensitivity (100% basis)(4)
Price $1,200/oz Pit Shell Gold Price ($M)
$1,200/oz
$805
After-Tax NPV5% $M 421
Economics(4) $677
After-Tax IRR % 28 $550
Total Ore Mined Mt 21 $421
Average Grade g/t Au 3.94*
Contained Gold Moz 2.6
Operational Total Tonnes Mined Mt 166
Summary(4) Average Strip Ratio w:o 6.9 $1,200/oz $1,300/oz $1,400/oz $1,500/oz
Average Production Koz 201
Total Production Moz 2.1
Mine Life Years 10+ Standalone Life of Mine Production(100% basis)(4)
Mining Cost $/t mined 3.55 300
$1,200/oz Pit Shell Gold Price
Cost Haulage Cost $/t milled 1.25 250
Summary(4) 245 237 245
Plant Cost $/t milled 18.02 200 221 227
201 206
G&A Cost $/t milled 8.60 175
150
162
Construction incl. of BIOX $M 413
100 115
Capex BIOX Capital $M 80
Summary(4) Sustaining $M 16 50
Rehabilitation Cost $M 23 25
0
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11
*Ore reserve grade 15
Refer to Endnote (4) in the Appendix.Anticipated Operating & Capital Synergies Support Teranga as Natural Acquirer of Massawa
Standalone Standalone Anticipated
Massawa Operation(4) Sabodala Operation Synergies and Opportunities(14)
(July 2019 Massawa Feasibility Study) (Year-to-date as at September 30, 2019*) (relative to July 2019 Massawa Feasibility Study)
Infrastructure $333 million for all +4Mtpa mill & TSF Reduces phase 1 and phase 2
Capex phase 1 and phase 2 infrastructure within ~30 km from Massawa capex for standalone mill and
infrastructure
$3.55/t mined (contractor; LOM)
Mining $2.86/t mined* Lower mine opex
+ $1.25/t ore haul to standalone mill
Processing $18.02/t milled (LOM), including BIOX $11.39/t milled*
Lower processing opex
G&A $8.60/t milled or ~$17 million/year $4.71/t milled* Lower G&A opex
Accelerated production with higher
Timing 2-year build; 10+ year mine life 13-year mine life
grade and longer mine life
*Year-to-date as at September 30, 2019.
Refer to Endnotes (4) and (14) in the Appendix. 16Optimizing Mill Feed for Grade, Recovery & Cash Flow
2P Reserve Grade
Indicative Sabodala-Massawa Processed Ore Profile* (g/t Au)
(Mtpa) 4.5
3.94(5)
4
3.5
3
2.5
1.35(3)
+4Mtpa Sabodala Current Mill Capacity
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Sabodala Massawa
Sabodala Ore 2P Reserves Contained Metal
(Moz Au)
2.65
2.6(5)
2.6
2.55
2.4(3)
2.5
2.45
Massawa Project Ore 2.4
2.35
2.3
Prioritize high-grade ore Sabodala Massawa
for maximum
free cash flow** Annual Production
(koz Au)
2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E 2025E
241(2)
203(4)
Intend to complete a pre-feasibility study to develop an optimized,
integrated mine plan within six months of transaction closing followed
by a definitive feasibility study Sabodala 2019 Massawa LOM
Average 17
*Refer to Endnotes (2), (3), (4) and (5) in the Appendix. Subject to integrated technical studies. **Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix. (First 10 Years)Majority of Reserves are Free-Milling;
BIOX a Proven Method for Refractory Ore
Massawa Feasibility Study July 2019: ~80% of Massawa Project
Ore Processed Through Whole Ore Leach Plant and ~20% Through
BIOX(5)
Central Zone, North Zone and Delya contain refractory ore
Massawa Feasibility Study envisioned BIOX addition to CIL plant
later in the mine life with $80 million capital cost(4)
Teranga will evaluate opportunities to combine CIL/BIOX and
optimize blend and recovery
Well-Established Method for Processing Refractory Ore
BIOX (biological oxidation) uses bacteria to oxidize sulphides in large
agitated tanks before treatment in a conventional plant
Applied at 18 mine-sites worldwide since 1986 – Fosterville Mine has
one of the world's leading BIOX systems and has achieved record
recoveries (~98% recovery as at YTD Q3 2019)
Testing, studies, and experts support BIOX at the Massawa project(4) 18
SOURCE: OUTOTEC.COM
Refer to Endnote (4) in the AppendixStrong Exploration Upside Potential Mali
Sabodala Gold Mine &
Massawa Project
Two Extensive Regional Shear Zone Structures Senegal, West Africa
Both Sabodala (920 km2) and Massawa (~600 km2) properties are
underlain by two extensive regional shear zone structures which Sabodala
host the majority of current resources and exploration prospects +4Mtpa
CIL Plant
Between these two regional shear systems there exists an internal 30km
structural corridor of oblique and inter-active secondary structures FROM THE
PLANT
known to host gold mineralization Bambaraya
Potential Exploration Upside Delya
Massawa Gold Tina
Considerable additional exploration upside remains at both free- Sofia
Project
milling and refractory ore bodies to expand the resource base in
Massawa
advance of an integrated feasibility study (CZ & NZ)
New discovery opportunities exist as exploration expands along
the regional shears and within the internal structural corridor
Teranga will embark on a drill program to expand the Massawa
project resource base in advance of a definitive feasibility study,
which is expected to be completed in 2021
Sabodala-Sofia
Shear Zone Main Transcurrent Map not drawn to scale. 19
Shear ZoneFully Funded Acquisition
$225 million acquisition facility amortizing over 3-year period ending Dec 31, 2022,
including $25 million to be provided by Barrick as a part of the lending syndicate Source of Funds ($M)
Taurus 2.75% upfront fee and 7.85% annual interest paid quarterly in arrears
Taurus 3-Year Acquisition Facility $225
Debt Other terms: (i) 100% offtake rights on Massawa project production (subject to buyback
right); (ii) 4 million Teranga call rights* New Equity
A total of $231 million in new equity (broker and private placement) Tablo Equity $45
– $75 million in cash to be paid as part of the Massawa acquisition
Equity Barrick Equity $80
– $80 million in Teranga common shares to the Vendors
Financing – $76 million to be retained for deal costs, reserve development, exploration of Teranga’s Public Equity $106
existing portfolio and working capital purposes
Total Sources of Funds $456
Through the equity financing, $45 million invested by Tablo (Teranga's largest shareholder)
Tablo
Tablo will retain 21.2% ownership on a pro forma basis Use of Funds ($M)
Equity
Massawa Transaction $380
Vendors to receive $80 million in Teranga common shares through the equity financing Teranga Corporate $76
Vendors Equity On a pro forma basis, Barrick will hold 11.45% of Teranga and CSTTAO will own 0.9%
& Contingent Total Use of Funds $456
Barrick to nominate one Board member so long as it retains a 10% equity ownership
Consideration Gold price-linked contingent payments due the later of the three years following completion
Completion of the acquisition facility, equity offering, and private
placement are all inter-conditional upon completion of the transaction.
of Transaction and January 31, 2023(16)
*Strike price equal to 120% of the 5-day volume weighted average price of Teranga on the date of the announcement of the Transaction. 20
Refer to Endnote (16) in the AppendixRelative Positioning Offers Opportunity for Potential Teranga Multiple Re-Rating
Price/Consensus Net Asset Value* (as of December 6, 2019) Price/Consensus 2020E CFPS* (as of December 6, 2019)
1.26x 6.2x
1.19x 6.1x
5.8x
1.00x
0.96x
4.6x
4.4x
0.83x
0.72x 0.69x 3.6x 3.6x
0.66x
0.60x 3.0x
2.8x 2.7x
0.49x
B2Gold Centamin Perseus Endeavour Golden Resolute Roxgold Semafo Teranga Asanko Centamin Perseus B2Gold Endeavour Golden Resolute Asanko Roxgold Semafo Teranga
Star Star
Status quo with multiples anticipated to be lower after factoring
in acquisition and further re-rate with synergies & value creating opportunities
Source: Company materials, Capital IQ, equity research. 21
*Based on consensus equity research estimates. As at December 6, 2019Targeting Increased Reserves, Grade, Production & Cash Margin
1,600
2020E Production (koz Au) Based on consensus equity research estimates, except for Massawa. Reserve Grade (g/t Au)
1,400
1,200
8.24
1,020
3.94(5)
1,000
800
751 3.36
2.86
600
511 492
424
334* 315 1.70 1.57 1.50 1.47
400
1.44 1.32
228 203(4) 1.16
200
134 119
0
B2Gold Endeavour Centamin Resolute Semafo Teranga Perseus Golden Star Massawa Roxgold Asanko Roxgold Massawa SEMAFO Golden Star Endeavour Asanko Resolute Perseus Teranga B2Gold Centamin
Life of Mine Project
Average
Years 1-10
2020E AISC ($/oz Au) Based on consensus equity research estimates. Reserves - Contained Metal (Moz Au, 100% Basis)
$981
$949 $943* 8.7
$916
$871 7.3
6.7 6.4
$821 $800 $789 $779
$702 4.0
3.3 2.9 2.6(5) 2.6**
1.8
0.7
Perseus Asanko Teranga Resolute Centamin Golden Star Semafo Endeavour B2Gold Roxgold Endeavour Centamin Resolute B2Gold Teranga Perseus SEMAFO Massawa Asanko Golden Star Roxgold
Project
*Not to be interpreted as Teranga’s production and cost guidance for 2020.
**Net of 50% JV with Gold Fields.
Refer to Endnotes (4) and (5) in the Appendix.
22
Source: Company materials, Capital IQ, equity research.Teranga’s Pro Forma Corporate Structure
Pro Forma Ownership in Teranga
As at Transaction Post Transaction
Capital Structure (millions) Pro Forma
January 17, 2020 Adjustment
Basic shares outstanding 107.6 59.8 167.4
CSTTAO
Barrick Gold
Teranga share price C$7.17 C$7.17
1%
11%
Basic market capitalization* $591.4 $920
Retail &
As at Transaction Tablo
Cash & Debt (millions)
September 30, 2019 Adjustment
Pro Forma
Corporation
21%
167.4M Institutional
Shares Shareholders
Cash & cash equivalents $28 $76** $104 67%
Cash from in-the-money securities* $26 $26
Total debt drawn $189 $225 $414***
*The Company used the January 17, 2020 closing share price of C$7.17 and US$/CDN exchange rate of 1.3041.
**Before transaction related costs, and excludes any other changes in cash occurring between October 1, 2019 – December 9, 2019. 23
***Excludes any changes in debt balances occurring between October 1, 2019 – December 9, 2019.Wahgnion
Burkina Faso, West Africa
24Wahgnion: Teranga's Recently Commissioned Gold Mine
1.6Moz 2.4Moz Commercial Production Achieved November 1, 2019
13-Year
2P Reserves M&I Resources Mine Life(6)
at 1.62 g/t Au(8) at 1.51 g/t Au(8)
+5M hours worked without a lost time injury
Strong 5-Year Profile with Potential to Increase Mine Life Completed two months ahead of the original schedule
Completed approximately $15M below budget
Life of Mine Summary(10) Initial 5 Years
2020-2024 First gold pour achieved in August 2019
Annual production(17) 132koz Mill operating above nameplate capacity
All-in sustaining costs* $761/oz Continued focus on social responsibility activities, such as
housing and livelihood restoration programs
Total free cash flow* $311M Raul
Exceeded the Upper End of Production Guidance
2019 Guidance Actual
Production 30-40koz 47koz(7)
*Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the Appendix
**Pre-production capital costs of $240 million excludes $16 million in construction
readiness activities spent prior to major construction
Refer to Endnotes (6), (7), (8), (10) and (17) in the Appendix 25Exploration Upside Potential Kondandougoug
Multi-Year Drilling Program to Commence in 2020-2021 Wahgnion Gold Mine (Open-pit)
Burkina Faso, West Africa
• ~12 regional drill-ready targets with the potential to become Permitted mining license: 89 km2
resources and within trucking distance of mill Mali Bagu Sud Samavogo North
• Konatvogo: 2,000-metre NW-trending anomaly between Korindougou
Fourkoura and Nogbele deposits. Up to 21.6 g/t Au from
altered shear-hosted quartz vein outcrops Samavogo
• Bassongoro: 1,500-metre NNE-trending soil and auger
anomaly (up to 15g/t Au). Intersection of regional Nianka and Kafina West Bazogo
Fourkoura structures undrilled Ouahiri
Bassongoro
Raul Nogbele
Côte d’Ivoire Raul Hillside
Konatvogo Stinger
Fourkoura
Petit Colline Muddhi
Sud
Plant
Reserve Deposits
Exploration Targets 26Golden Hill
Burkina Faso, West Africa
27Houndé Belt
Yaramoko
Early-Stage Initial Resource Provides Solid Burkina Faso, West Africa
M&I: 1.3Moz ²
Base From Which to Grow Golden Hill Mana & Siou
M&I: 4.2Moz ¹
Houndé
M&I: 3.1 Moz ³
415,000 oz 644,000 oz ACC
Holdings
at 2.02 g/t(9) at 1.68 g/t(9) Teranga’s
Golden Hill Project
Permits
Indicated Inferred Mineral Resource: (9) Teranga/ACC
Indicated: 415koz @ 2.02 g/t Au Holdings JV
Inferred: 644koz @ 1.68 g/t Au (Dossi Permit)
Highlights of Initial Resource Interpreted Geology
Acacia JVs
Andesite
• Excellent along trend and to-depth continuity of gold Basalt
mineralization at all prospects drilled Basin
Batholith
• Reaffirms interpretations that each prospect offers Chert ThreeBee
Karankasso JV
substantial upside for size expansion Granitoid M&I: 0.7Moz ⁵
Project
M&I: 0.3Moz 6
Tarkwaian
Sources
¹ Press Release, SEMAFO (March 5, 2019) South Houndé JV
² Press Release, Roxgold (July 11, 2019) Inferred: 2.1Moz ⁴
³ Annual Information Form, Endeavour Mining (March 26, 2019)
⁴ Press Release, Sarama Resources (September 4, 2019)
⁵ MD&A, Sarama Resources (August 27, 2019)
For full details on Golden Hill, please visit www.terangagold.com 6 MD&A, Sarama Resources (August 27, 2019) 28
Refer to Endnote (9) in the Appendix M&I Resources are inclusive of P&P ReservesProgressing Towards Feasibility Stage of Development Ma Far North
Ma North
Ma Main
Ma Jonction
Rapidly Advancing Project Golden Hill Ma East
(Burkina Faso, West Africa) Sebe Ma South
• Well advanced on the metallurgical test work Exploration licenses:468 km2
• Initial environmental and social studies have started and Gogoba North
MAIN SHEAR ZONE
engineering has commenced to support a mine license Nahiri Plateau
application in 2020 Nahiri
27,000-Metre Drilling & Exploration Program H2 2019 Gogoba West
• 11 separate drill targets identified for inclusion in drilling Geology Jackhammer Hill Offset
evaluation program, including five with no previous drilling
Tarkwaian Type Sediments
Nahiri South
• Additional 15,000 metres of auger drilling and 10,000 Volcano Sediments
Jackhammer Hill
Mixed Volcano Sediments & Volcanics
metres of excavator trenching
Basalt Peksou North
• Focused on identifying additional structural trends that Grantoid
Copper
Batholith
could add resources C-Zone Peksou
• Budget of ~$5 million for H2 2019 A-Zone
B-Zone
Intie
• Results expected to be released in Q1 2020
Included in mineral resource estimate 29Miminvest & Afema Exploration Opportunities
Côte d’Ivoire, West Africa
30Côte d’Ivoire: Future Value Resides with Miminvest and Afema Early-Stage Opportunities
3 4 Mali
Other
10% Sissingué Tongon
Guinea 4%
Miminvest Permits Afema Permits
11%
Dianra
Miminvest Exploration Properties Côte
(100% earning, 3% NSR; JV formed June 2016)
Ghana
19%
d'Ivoire Côte d’Ivoire
35%
• Guitry complex (includes Sangaredougou): Burkina
Faso
Highly prospective and potential district 21% Yaouré
Ity
• Dianra: Initial phase of exploration outlines Bonikro
favourable follow-up targets Côte d’Ivoire represents more
than one-third of the West African Agbaou Afema
Afema Mine Joint Venture Birimian Greenstone Belt Guitry Sangaredougou
(51%, earning 70%; JV formed December 2017)
• Two well mineralized greenstone belts underlie
mine license and regional land package Operating Gold Mine/ Development Project
• Five major shear structures crossing the
regional land package with a combined strike
length exceeding 140 km 31Encouraging Early-Stage Results on Miminvest Permits
Sissingué
Tongon
High Priority Guitry District (including Sangaredougou)
• First-ever drilling program at Guitry consisted of a 68-hole,
3,320 metre air-core drilling program Dianra
• This program included a series of shallow, widely spaced,
multi-hole drill profiles designed to evaluate the central
1,000-metre strike extent within an extensive gold-in-soil Côte d’Ivoire
geochemical anomaly covering a 3 x 7 km area
• The most favourable results were: Yaouré
– 24 metres grading 2.02 g/t Au (GUAC008) Ity
– 20 metres grading 6.37 g/t Au (GUAC018) Bonikro
– 4 metres grading 5.80 g/t Au (GUAC015)
– an additional +10 holes intersected 1.0-1.5 g/t over Agbaou
lengths up to 10 metres Afema
Sangaredougou
Guitry
Operating Gold Mine/Development Project 32Numerous Structures Identified by Airborne Geophysical Survey of Afema
Sefwi-Bibiani
Ahafo Gold Belt Asankrangwa
17 Moz Ashanti
Newmont Gold Belt
Gold Belt
Kumasi
• Completed high-definition Konogo
Esaase 1.4 Moz
airborne magnetic and Côte d’Ivoire Ghana Bibiani 5.19 Moz Signature Metals
radiometric survey of both the 7 Moz Obotan
Resolute 5.5 Moz Akyem
mine license and regional permits
Asanko Newmont
3 Afema Chirano Obuasi 41 Moz
• High quality survey data outlines Exploration
5 Moz Anglo Gold Ashanti
numerous fault zones, cross- Kinross
Permits
structures, lithologic contacts and Edikan Kubi 0.9 Moz
6.6 Moz Asaute Gold Corporation
areas of folded stratigraphy on Perseus
mince license
Bogoso/Prestea
• Compelling imagery worthy of 18 Moz
Winneba-Kibi
Golden Star Damang 7.1 Moz
extensive follow-up Goldfields Gold Belt
Afema
• Situated on two shear zones Tarkwa 24 Moz
Mining Permit
extending down from Ghana
Iduapriem
8.2 Moz
AngloGold Ashanti
Cape Coast
33
Afema Geophysical Survey: Reduced-to-Pole Magnetic IntensityAppendix 1
Executive Team
Richard Young, CPA Paul Chawrun, P.Eng, MBA Navin Dyal, CPA David Savarie, LL.B Chantal Da Silva, J.D., LL.L., BA Gwennael Guillen
President & CEO Chief Operating Officer SVP & Chief Financial Officer SVP, General Counsel, VP, Legal Affairs VP, Corporate Social Responsibility
25+ years’ experience in gold 25+ years’ experience in mining 13 years’ experience in mining including Corporate Affairs & People 15 years’ experience as a solicitor and 25 years’ experience in health,
mining including 13 years at Barrick including operations and 7 years at Barrick Gold as Head of 11 years’ corporate counsel experience corporate counsel advising on global safety, environment and community
Gold including finance and development projects for Fording Finance in copper business unit in mining including Deputy General finance transactions, M&A and relations, including 12 years on
corporate development Coal, Suncor, and Detour Gold Counsel and Corporate Secretary of commercial matters in natural mining projects in South America and
Gabriel Resources resources and financial services West Africa
Nancy Lee, MA David Mallo, B.Sc. Geology Trish Moran, BBM , PPA Leily Omoumi, MBA Aziz Sy, P.Eng, M.Sc., MBA
VP, Human Resources VP, Exploration VP, Investor Relations & VP, Corporate Development Regional Manager, West Africa
20 years’ experience in human 35+ years’ mineral exploration in project Corporate Communications 15+ years’ experience in the mining 17+ years’ experience in managing
resources with a focus on talent evaluation and program management, 25+ years’ experience in investor and financial services industries, gold exploration projects, including
development across industries in playing an integral role in acquisition, relations and communications, including including buy-side and sell-side his work as Vice President Senegal
Canada, US and Asia, including discovery, and exploration of world-class the mining and financial services analyst at two major Canadian banks Operations for the Oromin Joint
Director, Global Talent deposits including Eskay Creek and industries and at Hatch in a technical capacity Venture Group until its acquisition in 35
Management at Manulife Financial Cobre Panama 2014 by Teranga GoldTeranga Board of Directors
Alan Hill, M.Eng Richard Young, CPA William Biggar, MA, CPA Jendayi Frazer, Ph.D. Edward Goldenberg, MA, BCl
Chairman President & CEO Director Director Director
35+ years experience in 25+ years experience in gold 25+ years experience in senior 17 years experience in key roles Distinguished career in policy including
mining including 20 years at mining including 13 years at executive positions in investment, supporting initiatives and policies 10 years as Senior Policy Advisor to the
Barrick Gold in project Barrick Gold in finance and mining and real estate including to build Africa’s equity and commodity Prime Minister of Canada and the Prime
evaluation and development corporate development Barrick Gold and Merrill Lynch markets. First woman U.S. Ambassador Minister's Chief of Staff in 2003. Honourary
to South Africa Doctorate of Laws from McGill University
Christopher Lattanzi, B.Eng David Mimran Alan Thomas, CPA Frank Wheatley, LL.B
Pending close of
Director Director & Teranga’s Largest Shareholder Director Director Massawa acquisition
30 years experience in mining CEO of Grands Moulins d’Abidjan and 30+ years mining and energy 30+ years mining industry experience as and Barrick’s retained
property valuation, scoping, feasibility Grands Moulins de Dakar, among the industry experience in senior director, senior officer and legal counsel. ownership
studies and project monitoring on a largest producers of agri-food in West financial and director roles including Extensive experience in public financing,
global basis. Founder of Micon Africa. Special Advisor to the Government 6 years as VP and CFO of ShawCor project debt financing, permitting of large- 36
International of the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire and 11 years as CFO of Noranda scale mining projects and strategic M&A2019 Guidance (Year Ending December 31, 2019)
Sabodala Wahgnion Consolidated(24)
Total mined (‘000t) 37,000 – 39,500 8,000 – 10,000(22) -
Ore Mined (‘000t) 3,000 – 3,500 1,000 – 1,200(22) -
Grade mined (g/t) 1.50 – 2.00 1.80 – 2.00 -
Strip ratio waste/ore 9.5 – 12.0 - -
Ore milled (‘000t) 4,100 – 4,300 500 – 650 -
Head grade (g/t) 1.80 – 2.00 1.80 – 2.00 -
Recovery rate % 89.0 – 91.0 ~90.0 - Announced 2019
Gold produced(18) (oz) 215,000 – 230,000 30,000 – 40,000 245,000 – 270,000 consolidated production of
Operating Cost of sales per ounce sold $/oz sold 1,050 – 1,125 1,175 – 1,250(23) 1,050 – 1,125(23) 289koz on January 7, 2019
Results
Total cash costs per ounce sold* $/oz sold 725 – 775 - -
All-in sustaining costs(19)* $/oz sold 900 – 975 1,050 – 1,125(23) 1,000 – 1,100(23)
Non-cash inventory movements and
$/oz sold (75) (300)(23) ~ (100)(23)
amortized advanced royalty costs(19)
All-in sustaining costs (excluding non-
cash inventory movements and $/oz sold 825 – 900 750 – 825(23) 900 – 1,000(23)
amortized advanced royalty costs)(19)*
Mine Production Costs $ millions 165 – 180 - -
Sustaining Capital $ millions 10 – 15 - -
Capital Resettlement Capital $ millions 15 – 20 - -
Expenditures Wahgnion Construction $ millions - 115 – 120 -
Wahgnion Pre-Operating Costs $ millions - ~30 -
Corporate Administration Expense $ millions - - 13.0 – 14.0
Share-Based Compensation Expense(20) $ millions - - 3.5 – 4.5
Corporate and Regional Administration Costs $ millions - - 2.0 – 3.0 Refer to Endnotes (18), (19), (20), (21), (22),(23),
Other and (24) in the Appendix
Community Social Responsibility $ millions - - 4–5
*Refer to Non-IFRS Performance Measures in the 37
Exploration and Evaluation(21) $ millions - - 5 – 15 AppendixQualified Persons Statement (Teranga)
The technical information contained in this document to the activity which she is undertaking to qualify as a Metallurgy and Petroleum (the "CIM") Standards on Mineral
relating to the Sabodala and Wahgnion open pit mineral "Qualified Person" under NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM
reserve estimates is based on, and fairly represents, for Mineral Projects. Ms. Nakai-Lajoie has consented to the Council, as may be amended from time to time by the CIM
information compiled by Mr. Stephen Ling, P. Eng who is a inclusion in this document of the matters based on her ("CIM Standards"). There can be no assurance that those
member of the Professional Engineers Ontario. Mr. Ling is compiled information in the form and context in which it portions of mineral resources that are not mineral reserves
a full time employee of Teranga and is not "independent" appears in this document. will ultimately be converted into mineral reserves.
within the meaning of NI 43-101. Mr. Ling has sufficient
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation The technical information contained in this document Teranga confirms that it is not aware of any new information
and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity relating to the Sabodala underground ore reserves or data that materially affects the information included in the
which he is undertaking to qualify as a "Qualified Person" estimates is based on, and fairly represents, information technical reports for the Sabodala Project (August 30, 2017)
under NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral compiled by Jeff Sepp, P. Eng., of Roscoe Postle and the Wahgnion Project (October 31, 2018) pursuant
Projects. Mr. Ling has consented to the inclusion in this Associates Inc. (“RPA”), who is a member of the to National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for
document of the matters based on his compiled information Professional Engineers Ontario. Mr. Sepp is “independent” Mineral Projects (the “Technical Reports”), or third quarter
in the form and context in which it appears in this document. within the meaning of NI 43-101. Mr. Sepp has sufficient 2019 results, market announcements and, in the case of
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material
The technical information contained in this document and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the
relating to Sabodala, Wahgnion, and Golden Hill’s mineral he is undertaking to qualify as a “Qualified Person” under NI estimates in the relevant market announcements
resource estimates is based on, and fairly represents, 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Mr. concerning the Technical Reports continue to apply and
information compiled by Ms. Patti Nakai-Lajoie. Ms. Nakai- Sepp has consented to the inclusion in this document of the have not materially changed.
Lajoie, P. Geo., is a Member of the Association of matters based on his compiled information in the form and
Professional Geoscientists of Ontario. Ms. Nakai-Lajoie is a context in which it appears in this document.
full time employee of Teranga and is not "independent"
within the meaning of NI 43-101. Ms. Nakai-Lajoie has Teranga's disclosure of mineral reserve and mineral
sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of resource information is governed by NI 43-101 under the
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining,
38Appendix 2 Standalone Massawa Project
Massawa Project: Historical Mineral Reserves and Resources
Tonnes Grade Total Contained Tonnes Grade Total Contained
Mineral Reserve Mineral Resource
(Mt) (g/t Au) (Moz Au) (Mt) (g/t Au) (Moz Au)
CZ Probable (Central Zone) 7.8 4.59 1.15 OP Measured - - -
NZ Probable (North Zone) 5.2 4.67 0.79 OP Indicated 23 4.00 3.0
Total M&I 23 4.00 3.0
Sofia Probable 7.1 2.66 0.61
OP Inferred 3.7 2.2 0.26
Delya Probable 0.81 4.21 0.11
UG Inferred 2.6 4.1 0.35
Total Open Pit Probable Reserves 20.9 3.94 2.6 Total Inferred 6.3 3.0 0.61
Notes to reserve table above: Notes to resource table above:
• Open pit Mineral Reserves are reported at a gold price of $1,200/oz and include • Open pit Mineral Resources are reported as the insitu mineral resources falling
dilution and ore loss factors. within the $1,500/oz pit shell reported at an average cut-off grade of 0.8 g/t Au.
• Open pit Mineral Reserves were generated by Shaun Gillespie, an employee of • Underground Mineral Resources are those insitu mineral resources below the
Barrick, under the supervision of Rodney Quick, MSc, Pr Sci Nat, an officer of $1,500/oz pit shell of the North Zone 2 deposit reported at a 2.5 g/t Au cut-off grade.
Barrick and Qualified Person.
• Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves.
• Mineral Resources for Massawa were generated by Simon Bottoms, MGeol, FGS
CGeol, FAusIMM, an employee of the Barrick and Qualified Person.
Source: Barrick’s July 23, 2019 “Technical Report on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project, Senegal” 40Standalone Massawa Project ($1,200/oz Ore Reserve Case)
Production Forecast
Year Yr-2 Yr-1 Yr 0 Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Total
Production (koz) - - 221 227 201 245 237 206 245 115 162 175 25 2,060
Process Operating Cost Estimate Summary
CENTRAL ZONE NORTH ZONE SOFIA MAIN SOFIA NORTH DELYA
BIOX – BIOX 20%
BIOX- WOL BIOX WOL BIOX
Rock Type WOL 25%CZ WOL WOL Delya
100% CZ 100% NZ 100% NZ 100% Delya 100% Delya
75%NZ 80%NZ
Oxide ($/t milled) 11.29 N/A N/A 11.60 N/A 11.17 12.13 12.01 N/A N/A
Oxide Trans ($/t milled) 14.35 N/A N/A 13.41 N/A 12.95 12.84 13.76 N/A N/A
Reduced Trans ($/t milled) 15.73 43.09 26.88 14.57 25.79 14.31 13.56 13.93 48.69 29.70
Fresh ($/t milled) 17.40 43.09 26.88 15.74 25.79 15.68 14.30 15.62 48.69 29.70
Capital Cost Estimate per Phase
Description PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 TOTAL
Direct Field Cost 91,278,343 10,933,099 47,559,136 149,770,578
Indirect Field Costs 21,023,557 4,253,992 12,309,577 187,357,703
Home Office Costs 12,488,244 1,456,895 5,538,306 19,483,445
Total Plant Cost 124,790,144 16,643,986 65,407,019 206,841,148
Other Costs 147,803,128 181,009 7,541,511 155,525,648
Mining Costs 37,102,894 6,525,273 6,565,398 50,193,565
Total Construction Capital 309,696,166 23,350,267 79,513,928 412,560,361 41
Source: Barrick’s July 23, 2019 “Technical Report on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project, Senegal”Standalone Massawa Project ($1,200/oz Ore Reserve Case)
Life of Mine Estimated Capital Expenditures at $1,200/oz Gold Price
Item Year -1 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Total
Construction & Project Capital 89,017,300 166,523,217 77,505,917 53,009,285 26,504,643 412,560,361
On-going Capital - - 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,712,500 1,712,500 1,712,500 1,712,500 1,662,500 1,662,500 15,737,500
Pre-Production Capitalised - - - - - - - - - - - (10,000,000) (10,000,000)
Rehabilitation Asset - - - - - - - - - - - - 23,000,000 23,000,000
Total 89,017,300 166,523,217 78,618,417 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 1,112,500 54,721,785 28,217,143 1,712,500 1,712,500 1,662,500 14,662,500 441,297,861
NPV Sensitivity at Different Gold Prices & Discount Rates ($1,200/oz Pit Shell)
US millions Gold Price ($/oz)
Discount 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500
0% 163 339 518 696 874 1,051 1,229
5% 37 165 293 421 550 677 805
10% (34) 60 156 251 346 441 536
15% (76) (4) 69 142 215 287 360
20% (100) (43) 14 71 127 184 241
25% (113) (68) (22) 23 68 113 159
42
Source: Barrick’s July 23, 2019 “Technical Report on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project, Senegal”Qualified Persons Statement (Barrick)
A technical report to support the feasibility study for • Rodney Quick, MSc, Pr Sci Nat; Mineral
the Massawa gold project has been prepared in Resource Management and Evaluation Executive
accordance with National Instrument 43-101. The of Barrick;
report is dated as of 23 July 2019 and is filed on
SEDAR and available at www.barrick.com. Refer to • Simon Bottoms, MGeol, FGS CGeol, FAusIMM;
the Massawa Feasibility Study for further information Senior Vice President, Africa & Middle East
with respect to the key assumptions, parameters and Mineral Resource Manager of Barrick;
risks associated with the results of the feasibility
study, the mineral reserve estimates included therein • Richard Quarmby, BSc (Chemical Engineering),
and other technical information. The Massawa Pr Eng, CEng, MSAIChE, MIMMM; Africa &
Feasibility Study was filed by Barrick on a voluntary Middle East Capital Projects Metallurgist of
basis, and not as a result of a requirement of National Barrick; and
Instrument 43-101.
• Graham E. Trusler, MSc, Pr Eng, MIChE,
The following QPs, as that term is defined in National MSAIChE; CEO Digby Wells Environmental
Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for (Jersey) Limited.
Mineral Projects, have prepared or supervised the
preparation of their relevant portions of the technical
information described above and the related Massawa
Feasibility Study on file, and have consented to the
inclusion of such information in this document:
43Non-IFRS Performance Measures
The Company provides some non-IFRS financial measures as supplementary The WGC definition of all-in sustaining costs seeks to extend the definition of improve comparability of this non-IFRS financial measure with its peers. The
information that management believes may be useful to investors to explain the total cash costs by adding corporate general and administrative costs, comparative 2018 EBITDA has been restated to conform to the new
Company’s financial results. Beginning in the second quarter of 2013, we reclamation and remediation costs (including accretion and amortization), presentation. EBITDA is intended to provide additional information to investors
adopted an “all-in sustaining costs” measure consistent with the guidance exploration and study costs (capital and expensed), capitalized stripping costs and analysts and do not have any standardized definition under IFRS and
issued by the World Gold Council (“WGC”) on June 27, 2013, of which Teranga and sustaining capital expenditures and represents the total costs of producing should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
became a member on November 27, 2018. The Company believes that the use gold from current operations. All-in sustaining costs exclude income tax performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Management believes that
of all-in sustaining costs is helpful to analysts, investors and other stakeholders payments, interest costs, costs related to business acquisitions and items EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our ability to generate liquidity by producing
of the Company in assessing its operating performance, its ability to generate needed to normalize profits. Consequently, this measure is not representative operating cash flow to: fund working capital needs, service debt obligations and
free cash flow from current operations and its overall value. This measure is of all of the Company’s cash expenditures. In addition, the calculation of all-in fund capital expenditures. Beginning second quarter 2019, the Company
helpful to governments and local communities in understanding the economics sustaining costs and all- in costs does not include depreciation expense as it adopted adjusted EBITDA as a new non-IFRS financial measure.
of gold mining. The “all-in sustaining costs” is an extension of existing “cash does not reflect the impact of expenditures incurred in prior periods. Therefore, Management believes that adjusted EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our
cost” metrics and incorporate costs related to sustaining production. it is not indicative of the Company’s overall profitability. The Company also ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to: fund working
expands upon the WGC definition of all-in sustaining costs by presenting an capital needs, service debt obligations and fund capital expenditures, after
“Total cash cost per ounce sold” is a common financial performance additional measure of “All-in sustaining costs (excluding non-cash inventory adjusting for factors not reflective of the underlying performance of the
measure in the gold mining industry but has no standard meaning under IFRS. movements and amortized advanced royalty costs)”. This measure excludes Company. Adjusted EBITDA is intended to provide additional information to
The Company reports total cash costs on a sales basis. We believe that, in cash and non-cash inventory movements and amortized advanced royalty investors and analysts and does not have any standardized definition under
addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, certain costs which management does not believe to be true cash costs and are not IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures
investors use this information to evaluate the Company’s performance and fully indicative of performance for the period. of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The Company calculates
ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA adjusted to exclude unrealized and realized
information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for “Total cash costs per ounce”, “all-in sustaining costs per ounce” and “all- foreign exchange gains and losses, gains and losses on derivative instruments,
measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measure, in sustaining costs (excluding cash/(non-cash) inventory movements and non-cash fair value changes, impairment provisions and reversals thereof, and
along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a Company’s ability to amortized advanced royalty costs)” per ounce are intended to provide other unusual or non-recurring items.
generate operating profits and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash additional information only and do not have any standardized definition under
costs figures are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures “Free cash flow” is a non-IFRS financial measure. The Company calculates
Gold Institute, which was a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not free cash flow as net cash flow provided by operating activities less sustaining
products and included leading North American gold producers. The Gold necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as capital expenditures. The Company believes this to be a useful indicator of our
Institute ceased operations in 2002, but the standard is considered the determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures ability to generate cash for growth initiatives. Other companies may calculate
accepted standard of reporting cash cost of production in North America. differently. this measure differently.
Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may
not be comparable to other similarly titled measure of other companies. EBITDA is a non-IFRS financial measure, which excludes income tax and For more information and the reconciliation of these measures, please
related expenses, finance costs (including accretion expense), interest income refer to the Company’s latest management’s discussion and analysis
and depreciation and amortization from net (loss)/profit for the period. In 2019, accessible on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com.
Teranga amended the definition of EBITDA to exclude accretion expense to
44Endnotes
1. Based on the NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Sabodala Gold Project dated August 30, 2017 available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
2. At Sabodala, the Company produced a total of 241,276 ounces of gold in 2019, exceeding its production guidance of 215,000-230,000 ounces.
3. Sabodala’s Mineral Reserve estimate as at December 31, 2018. For more information regarding Sabodala’s mineral reserves and resources and related notes, please refer to the Company’s amended and restated annual information
form for the year ended December 31, 2018 dated July 31, 2019 available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
4. Based on Barrick Gold’s NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Feasibility Study of the Massawa Gold Project dated July 23, 2019 (the “Massawa Feasibility Study”) available at www.barrick.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
5. The Massawa project’s standalone historical mineral reserve estimate as at December 31, 2018 at a $1,200 gold price pit shell mineral reserves. For more information regarding the Massawa project’s ore reserve and mineral resource
estimates and related notes, please refer to the Massawa Feasibility Study available at www.barrick.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
6. Based on Teranga’s amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Wahgnion Gold Operations dated July 31, 2019 (the “Wahgnion Technical Report”) available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at
www.sedar.com.
7. At Wahgnion, the Company produced a total of 47,492 ounces of gold in 2019, exceeding its production guidance of 30,000-40,000 ounces.
8. Wahgnion’s Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates as at May 31, 2018. Mineral Reserves are estimated using a gold price of $1,250 per ounce. Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term gold price of $1,500 per
ounce, adjusted to match existing industry standards. For more information regarding Wahgnion’s Mineral Reserves and Resources and related notes, please refer to the Wahgnion Technical Report available on the Company’s
website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
9. Golden Hill’s Mineral Resource estimate as at November 30, 2018. For more information regarding Golden Hill’s Mineral Resource and related notes, please refer to the press release dated February 21, 2019 available on the
Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
10) Life of mine assumptions include: Gold Price $1,250 per ounce
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO): Wahgnion - $0.59 per litre; Sabodala - $0.46 per litre
Light Fuel Oil (LFO): Wahgnion - $1.04 per litre ($0.88 per litre during construction period); Sabodala - $0.81 per litre
Euro to USD Exchange Rate: $1.10.
11) This production target is based on proven and probable reserves only from Teranga’s Sabodala Project as at December 31, 2018. For more information regarding Sabodala’s Mineral Reserves and Resources and related notes, please
refer to the amended and restated annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2018 dated July 31, 2019 available on the Company’s website at www.terangagold.com and SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
12) This Sabodala free cash flow is an estimate that is based on the updated life of mine plan and reserve estimate for the Sabodala project, as set out in the Technical Report of Teranga for the Sabodala Project, Senegal, West Africa, dated
August 30, 2017 (the “Sabodala Technical Report”). See in particular Section 21 of the Sabodala Technical Report - Capital and Operating Costs.
45You can also read