Department of English and American Studies

 
CONTINUE READING
Masaryk University
              Faculty of Arts

            Department of
     English and American Studies

     English Language and Literature

                   Jakub Hamari

Jarhead: a Marine’s Chronicle of the Gulf
          War and other Battles
   A Narrative Analysis of the Novel
          Bachelor’s Diploma Thesis

     Supervisor: doc. PhDr. Tomáš Pospíšil, Dr.

                      2013
I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently,
using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography.

                                   ……………………………………………

                            2
ACKOWLEDGMENTS

        I would like to thank my supervisor, doc. Tomáš Pospíšil, for all his support and

help.

        I would also like to thank my friend Jan Zbořil, who has been a great supporter

during all phases of my work.

        Many thanks belong to my family, without whose support I would never even

get to write this thesis in the first place. Especially to my sister, who has offered me

many useful insights on the topic.

                                            3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5
2. Author’s biography..................................................................................................... 7
3. Swofford’s applied literary techniques ..................................................................... 9
4. Main Characters ....................................................................................................... 12
   4.1 Swofford ........................................................................................................................... 12
   4.2 Troy................................................................................................................................... 12
   4.3 Mr. Swofford .................................................................................................................... 13
5. Analysis of the Novel................................................................................................. 15
   5.1 Significance of the opening scene ................................................................................... 15
   5.2 Three moments shifting the perspective ........................................................................ 16
     5.2.1 Deciding for the Marines for the first time ................................................................. 16
     5.2.2 Thinking about suicide ................................................................................................ 17
     5.2.3 Swofford’s retrospective analysis ............................................................................... 19
   5.3 Joining the Marine Corps ............................................................................................... 20
   5.4 The Nature of Swofford’s War ....................................................................................... 23
     5.4.1 About Football and Field Fuck ................................................................................... 26
     5.4.2 Writing Home and Sexual Frustration ........................................................................ 29
     5.4.3 The Pain of (not) Killing ............................................................................................. 35
     5.4.4 The Anti-anti-war Movies........................................................................................... 40
     5.4.5 Religion in the USMC ................................................................................................ 42
     5.4.6 The War’s End ............................................................................................................ 43
   5.5 Looking back.................................................................................................................... 44
6. Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 46
Résumé in English ......................................................................................................... 51
Resumé v češtině ........................................................................................................... 51

                                                                       4
1. INTRODUCTION
       War has been a topic for writers since time immemorial. Throughout the

centuries, stories about war and the people who waged it were told, discussed and

interpreted. The twentieth century has provided amplitude of conflicts and vast amount

of war narratives, which have now become classics. The first decade of the twenty first

century has been marked by two major conflicts which saw the involvement of United

States Marine Corps. This is the fighting force in which Anthony Swofford participated

as a scout/sniper during the first Gulf War dubbed Operation Desert Strom, but the

marines called it simply The Desert. His narrative Jarhead: a Marine's chronicle of the

Gulf War and other battles has since its first release in 2003 become a cult novel among

the military personnel and highly praised war narrative among the critics (Rieckhoff,

2006; Author’s Website). The success of his debut novel was so massive, that Swofford

could not handle it and wasted most of it on drugs, sex and sports cars, in which he had

a near-fatal accident (The Book Show #1246). Swofford himself believes, that his time

in the Marine Corps is to blame for that more than the excess of money and fame

following the book’s success (The Book Show #1246).

       In my thesis, I discuss Anthony Swofford’s novel Jarhead in the form of the

original text. The novel, first published in 2003, offers the reader a very personal insight

on the thoughts and actions of Anthony Swofford during his adolescence and his stay in

the military.

       The work itself is divided into four main chapters, with the last one being

divided into multiple subchapters and I sum up the work with a conclusion.

       The first chapter provides Anthony Swofford’s background as a serviceman in

the USMC, but also his family relationships, which are fundamental for understanding

the novel itself, because of its autobiographical features.
The second chapter provides an insight on the literary techniques, which

Swofford uses in his novel. To point out some of these- unreliable narration based on

the terms proposed by Fludernik and, in popular war narratives, not so frequently found

method of establishing intimacy between the audience and the narrator by showing the

main character’s/author’s flaws.

       The third chapter of my thesis focuses on the three characters, who I found as

the most important in the plot twists of the novel. These characters are Anthony

Swofford himself, a fellow scout/sniper Troy and Swofford’s father, who I dubbed Mr.

Swofford, since his name is never given. This chapter helps the reader understand the

drive of the characters right from the beginning, so it makes navigation through the plot

simpler.

       The fourth and final chapter is pivotal for my thesis, because in it I analyze the

text Jarhead as a whole. I applied multiple subchapters into this chapter to analyze

certain aspects of the novel more thoroughly. The aim of the subchapters is to analyze

factors like cultural clash, Swofford’s relationship with women or his thoughts on

taking lives. Especially, I stress out the importance of the transition, which takes part on

three occasions. These occasions change Swofford from being a child, who is adamant

on becoming a marine and finally transforming the man into the author of Jarhead.

       Swofford himself mentions war movies as a great factor in his military life and

thus I also explore the connections between the so-called anti-war movies and the

effects they have on the narrator. This I achieve through the application of some

thoughts produced by Jeffrey Gross, Garrett Stewart and others. The text is carefully

analyzed to prove that Swofford’s narrative technique and the elaborate events of the

novel make it an unsurpassable enterprise in the war narrative genre of the last decade.

                                             6
2. AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY
       Anthony Swofford was born in 1970 in California. His family had strong ties to

the military. His grandfather went fighting in the WWII, his father served in Vietnam,

his uncle died during his service in the marines and his brother was enlisted in the army

and stationed in Germany, during Swofford’s time in the Gulf War. Due to his father’s

work in the Air Force, Swofford’s family lived most of his childhood on military bases.

       Anthony decided to join the military as early as possible, because he saw it as an

introduction to becoming a man and also he was afraid that he would become homeless.

He joined the United States Marine Corp at the age of 17, more accurately, half a year

after his 17th birthday, the minimal acceptable age for the recruit. He could have joined

at 17 but his parents would have to sign him up and they did not want another son

joining the military, so he waited another six months and signed himself.

       After his military career Anthony Swofford found hard adapting to civilian life

and after trying a variety of jobs he decided to deepen his education. He received

education at American River College, the University of California; Davis and the

University of Iowa Writer’s Workshop, where he received the Master of Fine Arts

degree. He then worked as a teacher at University of Iowa and Lewis, at St. Mary's

College of California and also at Clark College. Anthony Swofford is a Michener-

Copernicus Fellowship recipient (Jarhead, Author’s Website).

       After Jarhead he wrote a novel Exit A, a work of fiction, which still maintains

some autobiographic features and after that he wrote a completely autobiographic piece

Hotels, Hospitals and Jails depicting years following the events of Jarhead. Aside from

his literary achievements, he also contributed to the documentary Operation

                                            7
Homecoming: Writing the Wartime Experience, which focuses on Afghanistan and Iraq

experience of soldiers, marines and air men as they themselves have written it down.

                                           8
3. SWOFFORD’S APPLIED LITERARY TECHNIQUES
       The plot of the novel, told by the first person narrator, is never cohesive and

keeps transiting from one period of time to another one, related to each other only by

the presence of the narrator. The first person narrator is a homodiegetic narrator, mainly

because the other characters appearing in the story are depicted only by how their

actions appear in the narrator’s view (Fonioková 70) and the narrator’s view is blurred

“by wind and sand and distance, by false signals, poor communication, and bad

coordinates, by stupidity and fear and ignorance, by valor and false pride. By the

mirage.” (Swofford, 2).

       His unreliability as a narrator is based on his inability to provide accurate

information, he is ideologically unreliable and there is lack of objectivity of his claims.

These are three aspects that for Fludernik provide the basis of an unreliable narrator (qtd.

in Fonioková, 67). Fludernik proclaims that “for unreliability to be present in the text,

there needs to exist a secret, a figure in the carpet, that the reader has to uncover behind

(and against) the narrator’s discourse” (qtd. in Fonioková 50). This not the case of

Jarhead, there is no secret character present, there is only the narrator and his

complaints, which he gives to the audience.

        The narrator proves his unreliability in the very beginning stating: “[…] what

follows is neither true nor false but what I know.” (Swofford, 2). Swofford also adds

that he must have consulted maps, charts, weapon capabilities etc. to provide accurate

details about things that he has forgotten. He continues his narrative unconvincingly

with a try to remember the faces and names of his platoon mates, their girlfriends and

wives, who stayed faithful and who did not.

                                              9
Swofford clearly declares what he remembers or he does not, he is honest to his

audience, in an interview he stated that “I could have written a flattering portrait of

myself as a young Marine, but it would have been a much lesser book.” (Anderson).

This is an interesting method, because the popular culture, throughout time, tends to

show the soldier as the bearer of the best (preferably American) values, as seen in many

more or less successful war movies like The Green Berets (Kellogg; Wayne, 1968), Red

Dawn (Milius, 1984), Top Gun (Scott, 1986), Saving Private Ryan (Spielberg, 1998) or

Pearl Harbor (Bay, 2001).

       Even though Swofford at first undermines the reader’s faith in the accuracy of

his claims, he establishes a sense of intimacy between himself and the reader with lines

such as “[I remember] lovers to whom I lied; lovers who lied to me.” (Swofford, 3). The

reader must always keep in mind, already mentioned Swofford’s words: “[…] what

follows is neither true nor false but what I know.” (Swofford, 2), the memoire is not

going to provide accurate information about battles, unit movement or equipment, it is a

deeply personal account of what the United States Marine Corps (USMC) does not put

into their brochures.

       The perception of time and its recollection is of great importance in the whole

novel. Since Swofford tries to be as accurate as he can be, he uses precise dates for

things occurring during his time in the Desert. The dates he uses are taken from official

documents (Swofford, 2). There is a conflict between the precision of the dates during

the war and the vagueness of time, when he recalls his childhood or adolescence. There

is no documentary for his childhood or growing up he can find in the Federal

Depository Library, where he finds documents about the war (Swofford, 2). His

childhood and adolescence can be recalled only through strong emotional voyages into

                                           10
his memory. His precise dating of the events in the military is a resonance of the

military itself in him, the hard precise man, who is trying hard to cope with life. But

when he was a child he was not yet so hard or precise and thus his memories are more

tender and mellow, than the ones of him being a jarhead.

                                          11
4. MAIN CHARACTERS
       It is important to provide some detail on the main characters that appear in the

narrative. For the purposes of my thesis I have narrowed the amount of characters

analyzed to three- Swofford, Troy and Swofford’s father, known only as Mr. Swofford.

       4.1 SWOFFORD
       Throughout the book Swofford never gives the impression of being arrogant. He

is aware of his superior killing skills over the average infantry man, which would be a

source of great pride for the most marines, but he never praises himself for being

smarter or sexier or in any way a better man than anybody else.

       He states that “Like most good and great marines, I hated the Corps.” (Swofford,

33). This statement presumes that a sign of being a good and a great marine must be that

a person hates the USMC. Why he hates the Corps is that it takes away the possibility of

being something else than a marine. A person can be a good marine or a bad marine

(whose traits are not specified in Swofford’s narrative). There are only these two

absolutes and anything else is just not possible. This boxing in and cancelling of

possibilities frustrates the young man, as he wants to have dozens of opportunities in

life. Opportunities for being “smart, famous, sexy, oversexed, drunk, fucked, high,

alone […] known, understood, loved, forgiven […]” (Swofford, 33). A great motivation

for Swofford, during his time in the USMC, is the only one trait a person must have to

be a true marine and that is to kill “You consider yourself less of a marine and even less

of a man for not having killed while at combat.” (Swofford, 247).

       4.2 TROY
       Troy is an important character in Swofford’s narrative for many reasons, one of

them being a scene, where he interrupts Swofford’s suicide attempt. But what makes

                                           12
him truly important is the fact that he is mentioned by Swofford even outside the USMC

and after their involvement in the war. It is his death and his subsequent funeral, where

Swofford mentions him. The sense of lost is massive for Swofford, when he learns that

Troy died. Their comradeship was the cliché brothers in arms one. Something Philip

Caputo describes as being “unlike marriage, a bond that cannot be broken by a word, by

boredom, or divorce, or by anything other than death.” (Caputo, A Rumor of War, 18)

and even death seems unable to break this bond. Troy earns much of his respect in

memoriam when Swofford learns that Troy minimized his part in his war stories and

gave most of the credit to his comrades (Swofford, 79), thus confirming what Broyles

states “Every good story is, in at least some of its crucial elements, false.” (Broyles,

1984) and these stories, what Troy made up are the best ones for every audience, be it

Swofford, other marines or Troy’s friends in Michigan. The reason why Troy becomes a

major storyteller is that his stories resonate through his audience years after they have

been told and they even surpass their author’s death.

       4.3 MR. SWOFFORD
       Swofford’s childhood, as depicted in the book, is always set in a military frame.

This frame is mostly provided by his father, who was an Air Force officer during the

Vietnam War. His father’s experience in the war left him disturbed. What made the

relationship with his father even worse was that his father was a perpetual liar, as

Swofford states in an interview and that his biggest lie ever was that “he deceived

himself about how that little war in Southeast Asia had changed him.” (Monroy,

Writing What Haunts Us). However Swofford stresses out that his father was never the

stereotypical grunt depicted in the movies, due to his age, family ties and proclivities

towards Scotch and beer.

                                           13
“He was not crazed, fucked-in-the-head grunt, stoned on uppers

              and nodding on H, not stealthy Special Forces guru, nineteen or twenty,

              the perfect age to die, he was a father and a lifer, and while he wasn’t

              necessarily a patriot, he wouldn’t be fragging anyone over orders he

              didn’t groove on or dig- he’d build the fucking landing strip in the middle

              of the gookthick jungle and at the end of the day hope for Chivas and a

              Budweiser, write a few letters home, maybe screw a whore in the ville.”

              (Swofford, 39)

       His father’s post traumatic stress disorder manifested itself in him not being able

to stand in one place for too long, migraines, uncontrollable clutching of fists and

avoiding social events.

                      “His doctors weren’t able to explain these ailments […] Of course

              he needed help. […] My father was thirty-nine years old and the world

              seemed a dead, cold place, void of promises. The problems of his psyche

              had become manifest in this hands.” (Swofford, 41)

       Swofford himself is a product, a manifestation, of the Vietnam War, he was

conceived during his father’s leave on Honolulu and thus he will always make his father

remember his war experience. “In bed, in Hawaii, my parents are fornicating. I cannot

watch, and neither can you.” (Swofford, 40).

                                           14
5. ANALYSIS OF THE NOVEL

       5.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE OPENING SCENE
       The first chapter sets the tone and frame for the novel. It opens with, now former

marine, Anthony Swofford in his basement, almost nine years after his discharge “the

movie cliché, mad old warrior going through his memorabilia, juicing up before he runs

off and kills a few with precision fire.” (Swofford, 1). This scene is important because

the audience gets to know that Swofford is no longer tied to the military in an official

way and all his unofficial ties are hidden in his rucksack in the basement.

       This scene resembles an investigation of a burial site and exhumation of a corpse,

the forensic expert, Swofford, is “[…] not mad. I am not well, but I am not mad. I’m

after something. Memory, yes.” (Swofford, 1) and the corpse is, as the quote suggests, a

memory of his former life. The author is undergoing a radical change of thinking, which

I will analyze in greater depth in the following subchapter.

       In this chapter Swofford states that he is not well now, but clearly he also was

not well then, in the USMC, and certainly he was not well in the Desert.

                      “I remember about myself a loneliness and poverty of spirit;

               mental collapse; brief jovial moments after weeks of exhaustion;

               discomfiting bodily pain; constant ringing in my ears; sleeplessness and

               drunkenness and desperation; fits of rage and despondency; mutiny of the

               self; lovers to whom I lied; lovers who lied to me.” (Swofford, 3)

       This passage states what kind of narration can the reader expect trough the

whole novel and presume that it will be frantic, gloomy and most of all deeply personal.

                                            15
5.2 THREE MOMENTS SHIFTING THE PERSPECTIVE
       In the novel, there are three major scenes concerning Swofford’s growing-up.

All three are brought up by severely disturbing experiences and the narration is thus

blurred and warped by Swofford’s state of mind at that time.

       5.2.1 DECIDING FOR THE MARINES FOR THE FIRST TIME
       The first occasion that changed the course of Swofford’s life was him witnessing

the bombing of marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, killing 241, mostly marines, by

then he was fourteen (Swofford, 127). This time he felt the death of others and he

wanted to reciprocate for what those 241 dead have given up for him. “At the ripe age

of fourteen I’d decided my destiny. I would war and fight and make good for those dead

boys dead in Lebanon […]” (Swofford, 131).

       He, for the first time, grasped something what he calls manhood

                      “[The marines] were men and I was a boy falling in love with

              manhood. I understood that manhood had to do with war, and war with

              manhood and to no longer be just a son, I needed someday to fight.”

              (Swofford, 128)

       The transition into manhood according to Jeffords is “a set of images, values,

interests, and activities held important to a successful achievement of male adulthood in

American cultures.” (Jeffords, The Remasculinization of America, xxii) and for

Swofford these images, values and so on, were deeply connected to the imagery

provided by the USMC. Jeffords’ main argument is the masculinity and it is deeply

entrenched in the American culture as such. Swofford’s naïve visions of manhood

confirm her theory.

                                           16
Swofford also states that from that moment, when he decided to become a

marine, he did not care much about anything else then joining the Corps. His social life

was shattered “[other kids] thought I was crazy and that with my camouflage hat and

talk of war and retribution I might kill someone or myself.” (Swofford, 128)

           But this mattered little to adolescent Swofford since he describes himself as a

loner.

                            “I kept most of my life to myself, not willing to share what would

                   be ridiculed and tainted by the kids smarter and hipper and better dressed,

                   the better athletes, the better students, the kids who’d fuck already, the

                   punk rocker and metalheads and all of them- any of the groups to which I

                   could never belong.” (Swofford, 131)

           5.2.2 THINKING ABOUT SUICIDE
           The second occasion, where Swofford swaps time and place and tries to grasp

the past events takes place during his stay in the rear-rear1. Swofford for the first time

mentions his older sister, who is constantly threatening to end her life, so she has to be

locked up in a mental hospital. The sanity of the narrator is also in question as he has

doubts about the place located outside of the soon-to-be combat zone and he rather be in

the field than in this “abandoned oil company camp” he believes to, in fact, be

                            “[…] a military base that had sat vacant for years, waiting for the

                   American protectors to arrive in the event of regional conflict, protectors

                   who’d be tolerated until they obliterated the threat and returned the

                   region’s massive oil reserves to their proper owners.” (Swofford, 63)

1
    A safe zone located behind the warfront

                                                 17
In this place Swofford feels strong anxiety but his “[…] platoon mates urge me

to please shut up about the place being rigged, about the Saudis wanting us to die for

their oil […]” (Swofford, 65) so he decides to step down from his argument. A fellow

Marine is down at sick call, being on a “suicide watch” after witnessing his wife’s

infidelity on a videocassette, she sent him. The term “suicide watch” makes Swofford

think about his sister and the visits he and the mother gave her in institutions for

suicidal patients. The suicide stays a strong topic for Swofford even after the events of

Jarhead as he participates in the Hero Project with his contribution on new wave of

suicides in the military (Swofford, Newsweek, Vol. 159, No. 22).

       Swofford’s sister attempted suicide more than once and she spends most of her

life in these institutions, as Swofford foreshadows. After contemplating about his

girlfriend’s possible infidelity, which he sees as certainty, Swofford puts the muzzle of

his rifle into his mouth.

                       “But Kristina’s various infidelities are not the reasons […] The

               reasons are hard to name. […] To move closer toward my sister?

               Cowardice? Fatigue? Boredom? Curiosity? It’s not the suicide’s job to

               know, but only to do.” (Swofford, 70)

       His squad mate Troy walks in just in time to stop him. Swofford later

contemplates about himself not yet having reached the point, where he could commit

suicide with a clear mind. He directly links the act of taking one’s own life as an act of

courage and that he lacks the courage.

                       “[…] I think suicide is rather courageous. To look at one’s life

               and decide that it’s not worth living, then to go through with the horrible

                                           18
act […] there is the courageous man and woman, the suicide. But I don’t

                    own the courage to kill myself.” (Swofford, 74)

           5.2.3 SWOFFORD’S RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
           The last one, going deep into his childhood on an American Air Force base in

Japan, is started after the humiliating football game in full MOPP suits2 during intense

heat of the Desert. Combined with food poisoning, Swofford and other squad members

were not yet aware of, led to a loss of consciousness and most certainly death if they

were not taken care of (Swofford, 24).

           Shortly after the football game, Swofford states that he must sit down and as his

senses fail, the narration jumps from the Desert to his memories from Japan. He, as a

child, wants to buy candy for his sister’s birthday and stranded roams the streets of

Tachikawa, until he wanders into a tattoo shop, where a couple is getting a portrait

tattoo of each other done (Swofford, 23). When the tattoo artist notices him he throws a

cigarette at him, the child Swofford picks it up, throws it back and runs out of the shop.

The woman starts screaming. “I didn’t stop running until I made it home.” (Swofford,

24)

           This scene serves as a template for Swofford’s state of mind during the whole of

the novel. He goes someplace with a good intention, observes and tries to understand

acts that are incomprehensible for him at that moment, so he can analyze them after

many years.

           After the evidence I have provided there can be little doubt that this is a product

of mere exaggeration or a literary tool for building up the existential features of the

2
    Mission Oriented Protective Posture, suit protecting its wearer against biochemical weapons

                                                     19
book. Swofford provides these three occasions to underline his personality and that his

narration will be fractured, grim and not cohesive, due to his experiences during his

childhood and growing up.

       5.3 JOINING THE MARINE CORPS
       Swofford, apart from a means for manning up, sees the USMC as a way of

escaping a gruesome life of the homeless, because during Reagan’s administration the

homeless situation became a major topic for the media and thus it was affecting then

adolescent Swofford. He therefore feels lucky to have a home in the Corps.

                      “I’d always worried about losing my home and running out of

               everything […] As a teenager I often suffered anxious daydreams of

               becoming homeless, out of a job, unskilled and unloved. […] I joined

               the Marine Corps in part to impose domestic structure upon my life, to

               find a home […]” (Swofford, 145)

       The reason why he chose the Marine Corps over other branches of the American

military is fairly simple, he did it to spite his father, who was an airman, wings, as they

are called by the legs, which is how the airmen denounce the marines. (The Book Show

#1246).

       Swofford entered the United States Marine Corps at the age of 17 and a half.

The reason why I stress these six months is that the recruit can join at age 17, which

Swofford wanted, but only under the condition that their parents (or other legal

representatives) have signed the contract in acknowledgement of this (Swofford, 204).

That does not happen in Swofford’s case. The reason is quite simple- the parents did not

agree with their son joining the military at such a young age. The reason mother gave is

follows
                                            20
“[…] You should go to college before you decide to run off in the

                military. I missed college because I married your father, and the next fall

                when I should’ve been at the university, I was in Seville. Spain was nice,

                but college would’ve been better. You don’t want to run away to dirty

                foreign countries. Every marine we ever met complained about the

                Marine Corps. They get paid less than anyone else and the food is

                supposed to be the worst.” She looked away from me.”And the women

                near the bases have diseases. […]” (Swofford, 130)

        Mrs. Swofford feels, like most mothers, what her son is like better that the son

himself. It is not just protection from poor social status the marines hold or the risk of

sexually transmitted diseases, which make the USMC unfavorable. She knows her son

is a gentle and intelligent person (Swofford, 248) and she is certain that, eventually, he

would voluntarily, after a bitter struggle for happiness, leave the Corps, which indeed

does happen. Another marine commented on this in his open letter to Defense

department: “What concerns me […] is that among my peers, the ones with ideas are

the ones getting out, because they just don't feel the organization values

them.“ (Anonymous, A Marine officer: I’m leaving the Corps because it doesn’t much value

ideas, 2011).

        Swofford’s father’s reasons were much different, less practical than his mother’s,

but the intension was the same- not getting their son killed. He had personal experience

of the military, his brother died while in the marines and their father, Anthony’s

grandfather, served in the Air Force during the WWII, so what he had to say to this

matter was deeply rooted in him. On the day Anthony brought the Staff Sergeant home

to convince his parents, the father proposed this

                                            21
“Staff Sergeant, I’ll sign your contract if you guarantee me you

                   won’t get my son killed. Then I’ll sign your contract […]” The recruiter

                   said, “I’m sorry, sir. I cannot tell you that. I can tell you Tony will be a

                   great marine. That he’ll be a part of the finest fighting force on earth and

                   he’ll fight proudly all enemies of the United States, just as you did once.

                   He will be a great killer.” (Swofford, 206)

          Needless to say, the meeting between Swofford’s parents and the Staff Sergeant

did not result in Swofford entering the USMC at age 17. Young Anthony Swofford

would eventually join the military six months later, but back then he was devastated to

realize how his parents altered his fate.

                             “What would I do with myself? […] I wanted to be a killer, to kill

                   my country’s enemies. […] I needed the Marine Corps now, I needed the

                   Marine Corps to save me from other life I’d fail at […]” (Swofford, 207)

          He felt that USMC was the only way for him and he felt prepared for it and

ready to join the ranks (The Book Show #1246). The greater was the sense of defeat,

when he could not follow his calling.

          In the interview for WAMC3 he states that he perfectly understands the reasons

of his parents for postponing his application for the USMC, since the promise of making

a fine killer out of one’s child does not intrigue as much parents as expected, but still

the disenchantment was beyond measure for the teenager (The Book Show #1246).

3
    Northeast Public Radio

                                                 22
5.4 THE NATURE OF SWOFFORD’S WAR
       After providing the details and analysis of Swofford’s pre-military life I will

now focus on the major factor of his narrative and that is the introduction of American

armed forces, including Swofford’s unit, into the conflict that would become to be

known as the First Gulf War.

       In this part of my thesis I will analyze Swofford’s mind-set, during his

deployment in the Desert and the major events that played role in shaping him into the

author, who wrote the Jarhead.

       Soon after his arrival at the airport in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on August 14, 1990,

Swofford states that it matters little to him and his fellow Marines how the war will end.

He is not there to care about politics, however absurd he might find them- he is there to

kill, and likely be killed, just two days after his twentieth birthday (Swofford, 10).

                       “[…] we laugh to obscure the tragedy of […] being deployed to

               protect oil reserves and the rights and profits of certain American

               companies, many of which have direct ties to the White House and

               oblique financial entanglements with the secretary of defense, Dick

               Cheney, and the commander in chief, George Bush […] And at this point

               we also know that the outcome of the conflict is less important for us- the

               men who will fight and die- than for the old white fuckers and others

               who have billions of dollars to gain or lose […]” (Swofford, 11).

       This tragic note that Swofford brings up in his book, first published in 2003, just

some three weeks before the beginning of the controversial second invasion to Iraq,

which the UN did not give clearance for, resonates in minds of many people and not just

the military personnel. What is so unnerving about this statement is that Swofford, and
                                             23
likely other people, knew about how bizarre the conflict is, but unlike the non-military

population Swofford did not have the chance to voice his opinion. Broyles comes with

this statement: “The truth is, the reasons don’t matter. There is a reason for every war

and a war for every reason.“ (Broyles, 1984) and it can be applied to Swofford’s

situation perfectly. His tour of duty must be fulfilled, no matter what the personal

feelings, about the conflict, are. But still, he is very frank about what he thinks about the

nature of the conflict “[…] we fought for the oil-landed families living in the places

deep with gold, shaded by tall and courtly palm trees.” (Swofford, 240).

       A question rises what have all these people been doing in the Desert during their

stay there. Trooper’s primary occupation, for the time being, was to wait and keep

hydrated, as Swofford states (Swofford, 11). That is what they did most of the time, but

during their waiting and hydrating, the real labor occurred inside their heads.

                       “We look north toward what we’re told is a menacing military,

               four hundred thousand or more war-torn and war-savvy men. Some of

               the Iraqi soldiers who fought during the eight-year Iran-Iraq War

               (September 1980 to August 1988) began tasting combat when we were

               ten years old.” (Swofford, 11)

       Even before the actual fighting begins the Iraq armed forces have the upper hand

in the psychological warfare. This is happening without their participation. Their

infamous status is a hear-say based on something somebody heard somewhere, but even

something like this has a profound effect on the morale of the young Americans.

                                             24
After their six weeks in the Kingdom of Saud a spark of excitement appears- the

reporters are finally coming. First civilians, who would meet the deployed Marines in

weeks, the atmosphere among the men was close to ecstatic.

                     “Knowing the reporters will arrive soon, we shave for the first

              time in a week, pull new cammies from the bottoms of our rucks, and

              helmet-wash our pits and crotches and cocks. Vann’s wife sent him a

              bottle of cologne, and we each dab a bit on our neck and our chest.”

              (Swofford, 13)

       But the excitement does not get to last long as the commanding officer Sergeant

Dunn and Staff Sergeant Siek tells the men what topics they will avoid in the

conversations with the reporters. The outspoken voice of the group is Kuehn who says

the public thoughts “This is censorship. You’re telling me what I can and can’t say to

the press. That is un-American.” (Swofford, 14) the immediate response from Staff

Sergeant Siek is: “You do as you’re told. You signed the contract. You have no rights

[…] There is no such thing as speech that is free.” (Swofford, 14). The men are not

happy with this, but there is not a thing they can do, because Siek is right- they are

government property and now they must learn how to act like such.

       And the reporters are very much aware of the fact, that the men were already

scripted. They know because they have been told the same proud patriotic lines in every

camp they have been to and there is no chance to hear something true, anything

different form the usual lines the young Marines have to offer, such as “Yes, ma’am, I

believe in our mission […] I’m proud of our president standing up to the evil […] This

is about freedom, not oil […] I’m proud to serve my country […] I’m proud of what the

Corps has made me.” (Swofford, 16)
                                          25
This does not mean that the men do not feel the need to speak to the reporters

one on one about the way they feel about the whole operation. Swofford gets the closest

to expressing his thoughts, when he is offered a football by the reporter, which he

throws with a fellow squad mate, while the reporter is with them.

                       “I don’t care about human rights violations in Kuwait City.

               Amnesty International, my ass. Rape them all, kill them all, sell their oil,

               pillage their gold, sell their children into prostitution. I don’t care about

               the Flag and God and Country and Corps. I don’t give a fuck about oil

               and revenue and million barrels per day and U.S. jobs. […] I’m twenty

               years old and I was dumb enough to sign a contract […] I can hear their

               bombs and I am afraid.” (Swofford, 17)

       Swofford feels this anxiety after weeks in the all invading sand and the endless

waiting. This monologue proves that no matter how rigorous the brainwashing and the

indoctrination of the famed fighting force is the individual still survives to think

critically about the situation they are put in. The statement itself is full of force. It is a

call of desperation of a young and lost soul. Any amount of the processed truth, which

the command offers, does not help the individual get over the absurdity of the situation.

Swofford is young and unimpressed and most of all he is afraid, because the end of his

life seems almost within a hand’s reach.

       5.4.1 ABOUT FOOTBALL AND FIELD FUCK
       What immediately follows the time killing activity of throwing the ball is the

infamous and dehumanizing MOPP suit football game. Broyles’s quote “War, since it

steals our youth, offers a sanction to play boys’ games.” (Broyles, 1984) could not be

more accurate. To add even more volume to the absurdity of the situation, the suits are

                                             26
in jungle camouflage. This would surely prove to be an extreme tactical advantage in

the desert. During the game, the heat inside the suit reaches 60 degrees Celsius. “I think

of fighting with this gear on and I hope, more than anything, that if we are going to war,

and they are going to kick our asses, that they’ll do it with an A-bomb […] And soon.”

(Swofford, 19).

       Siek calls the teams for a demonstration of the drinking tubes build into the

MOPP suits to tell the reporters “Aren’t we smart, we’ve thought of everything.”

(Swofford, 19) but the demonstration goes poorly as the men have been carrying the

suits around for weeks and now most of the suits are not in the shape that could protect

the wearer. Swofford decides to make the situation even more unfavorable for Staff

Sergeant Siek as he, with his existentialist attitude, says: “I requested a new gas mask

four months ago […] we have unserviceable filters in our masks. We’re all dead. We

are the ghosts of STA 2/7.” (Swofford, 20), this enrages Siek even further and he orders

the men to resume the game. The men are exhausted and their morale is falling apart.

During the resumed game the situation escalates into a human pyramid fight for the

king of the mountain. Siek lost control of his men and nobody is capable of stopping

them. And the reporters are all there to witness how America’s finest behave in extreme

conditions. The Field Fuck is about to commence. What the Field Fuck demonstrates is

the men’s resistance, a fight against all odds, a shriek of defiance in the face of vanity,

all shaped into a scene during, during which the men grab their buddy Kuehn and act

out a rape scene.

                      “I feel frightened and exhilarated by the scene. The exhilaration

               isn’t sexual, it’s communal- a pure surge of passion and violence and

               shared anger, a pure distillation of our confusion and hope and shared

                                            27
fear. We aren’t field-fucking Kuehn; we’re fucking the press-pool

               colonel[…] and President Bush and Dick Cheney and the generals, and

               Saddam Hussein […] we’re fucking our confusion and fear and boredom;

               we’re fucking ourselves for signing the contract […] we’re angry and

               afraid and acting the way we’ve been trained to kill, violently and with

               no remorse […] (Swofford, 22)

       This quote is a portrait of Swofford’s, and not only his, feelings about the whole

adventure in the Desert. I see it as one of the fundamental scenes of the book, because

through Swofford’s explicit language, the audience receives the kind of feeling the men

had and can relate to the various subjects touched by Swofford. It is because the men

are young, full of sexual energy and taught a set of murdering skills, that this ventilation

of all the negatives manifests itself as a violent sexual act, with which the men shake off

and laugh off the built up stress and other negative influences like confusion, distrust of

the Government or boredom, which Swofford mentions.

       Boredom is a well known phenomena of military life and another author of a

war narrative refers to it, acknowledging Swofford himself “Our days overflowed with

extreme boredom […] I remembered the painful vigil of waiting described in Jarhead,

Anthony Swofford’s classic Gulf War memoir” (Rieckhoff, Chasing Ghosts: A Soldier's

Fight for America from Baghdad to Washington, 26).

       After this scene Swofford faints and has a flashback into childhood in Japan, as I

have analyzed before. If there was any punishment from Staff Sergeant Siek, which is

very likely to have been, it is not mentioned and it is right to presume that no

punishment could spoil the great vent of the Field Fuck.

                                            28
Field Fuck as helpful as it is for the audience, it does not provide with much of

long-term help. Swofford still does not feel any better over the situation. He could be at

peace with the lies he is fed by the chain of command and the heat and sand of the

Desert, he could be even at peace with the enemy he is in war with, but he cannot get to

be at peace with himself.

       5.4.2 WRITING HOME AND SEXUAL FRUSTRATION
       On occasional down-time, which seems more than occasional during the war,

Swofford writes many letters. These letters serve as a means of escaping the present.

“At times I thought I might write myself away, fit my entire body and mind into a few

thick envelopes, and that way, as a stowaway, escape the ghastly end that awaited me.”

(Swofford, 37)

       Letters play another role in the narrative. A role of much different than the one

of soothing. The letters from home are almost never soothing for Swofford. The most

problematic are the letters from Swofford’s girlfriend Kristina, who is unfaithful,

Swofford believes.

                      “Kristina, the woman I’m currently supposed to love, the woman

               who is supposed to love me, is having sex with someone else […] I know

               the sex is occurring, because she has called him a good friend and a great

               listener […] I imagined that soon she’d be sleeping with one of the

               [hotel] clerks.” (Swofford, 69)

       Whether or not Kristina was faithful remains unseen, but it matters little to

Swofford as his mind is set on the impulses she had provided him with. After his

contemplation about the fidelity of his girlfriend, comes his suicide attempt, which is

stopped by his platoon mate Troy. Earlier in my thesis I have put forth the reasons for
                                           29
his near suicide as not to be linked with Kristina’s actions back home. Those reasons are

much heavier pro-suicide arguments, certainly more profound compared to partner’s

infidelity.

        Swofford mentions Kristina when he gets drunk, in this scene he starts burning

the letters he received from Kristina. He is sure of the impermanence of things, namely

relationships, which are artificially held together by the need of the moment. “In the

lower right corner of her letters, two imp-like creatures are holding hands under a palm

tree, with a caption floating in clouds that reads “Tony and Kristina Forever.” The

stationery makes me ill […]” (Swofford, 91).

        This passage is evidence of Swofford not valuing his relationship with Kristina.

It is a proof that he is emotionally distant from the life he left back home. This distance

is disturbing since he does no longer feel engaged in personal matters outside the

military world.

        His emotional distance is even more stressed out when he holds an auction of

Kristina’s seminude photos. The auction is a failure as the only buyer backs down

because “[…] That bitch is damaged goods,” Troy says. “Right now she’s dorking some

hotel clerk. Unfaithful is unfaithful. I don’t want her photo. I got better jerking material

in my head. […]” (Swofford, 90)

        Swofford draws a line behind his relationship, when he attaches the photos to the

Wall of Shame, a place where marines put up the photos of their unfaithful partners for

all other marines to be aware. Motivation for a public display of the fact that one was

betrayed by their loved ones is always different and Swofford does not provide any

analysis why would anybody want to perform this symbolic pillory of the other person.

                                            30
He attaches Kristina’s photos and inscribes a message for other marines “I don’t know,

but I’ve been told she’s seeing someone new.” (Swofford, 92). He minimizes his status

of the one being betrayed through the act of becoming a remote viewer (Peebles,

Welcome to the Suck: Narrating the American Soldier's Experience in Iraq, 31).

       Swofford blames the amount of undirected sexual energy, the sexual frustration

of the marines, to the fact, that there is no place in Saudi Arabia to ventilate it, unlike

other places, where the Americans have waged their wars (Swofford, 92).

       Since there are no women to be seen in the general vicinity of the marines, they

feel this way. Unlike in other conflicts, there is not a single native woman to be looked

at, raped, bought or courted. This is troubling for the young men as they were used to a

vast amount of sexual experiences during their training deployment in the Philippines.

Swofford during his war experience in the Desert mentions only once a native woman

and aside from the reporter, who visited them, she is the only woman in the Desert.

       This single woman is encountered, when the unit is passed by a Saudi Mercedes-

Benz with a male driver and a woman passenger wearing a hijab. The marines left a

poor image concerning their manners.

                      “Crocket stands in the back of the Humvee [and] puts his other

               hand to his mouth, licking his tongue between two fingers […] woman

               sits alone in the backseat of the car, and I watch her eyes follow

               Crocket’s crude gesture. I don’t know if she’s registering shock or

               confusion of disgust […] and Crocket says, “that bitch will never forget

               me. She wanted me.” (Swofford, 140)

                                            31
Through this act the men fail to establish any friendly connection with the native

woman or the natives in general. The immediate argument might be that the marines are

not there to make friends. Even though this argument is valid, the truth is that, as Stacey

L. Peebles states, “These soldiers fight as representatives of the nation […]” (Peebles,

25) and as such the marines fail to express the famous hearts and minds methodology

adopted by the U.S. military. For comparison a fellow combatant, Rieckhoff, establishes

friendly terms with the native he dubbed as Big Foot, by getting him a pair of new shoes

and he comments on this situation “One pair of shoes has done more than a hundred

bullets could ever have to win that man to our side forever.” (Rieckhoff, 245).

       This scene marks a clash of cultures but also brings up the topic of sexual

frustration in the military. Swofford ends the chapter after this scene and offers the

audience no further comment on the subject, because there is no further comment

needed, the scene is self-explanatory. Stacey L. Peebles focuses on the connection

between sexual frustration and violence depicted in Jarhead in the first chapter of her

work. Her arguments are sound, but nothing new on the topic compared to William

Broyles and his work on the topic. Furthermore she makes factual mistakes like labeling

Swofford as an infantry man instead of a scout/sniper, despite he clearly states himself

“above” the average infantry man on many occasions throughout the book, this is also

something Geoffrey A. Wright points out in his review of Peebles’s book (2011, 241).

       The sexual frustration that the men feel is likely to lead to further acts of

violence, which eventually do occur. While most men in the truck refrained to partake

in the vulgar act, Crocket, the unmarried man, committed fully. Another clearly

sexually frustrated man is Fowler, who is always chasing prostitutes during leave. But

now, there is no shore leave to vent his urges in sight. It is also Fowler, first violating

                                            32
the conventions of warfare, when he shoots and kills a Bedouin camel and, further on in

Swofford’s narrative, proceeds to hack and disfigure the bodies of dead Iraqi soldiers

(Swofford 162).

       The profound connection between sex and violence has been explored in an

article on the web page of Psychology today.

                       “[…] war-like societies intentionally cultivate sexual frustration

              in young men because their resulting aggressiveness makes them better

              soldiers, much like boxing trainers making fighters swear off women.

              Criminologists have long known that unmarried young men commit the

              bulk of the crimes in the United States.“ (Ryan, On Sex and Violence)

       And Swofford wholeheartedly confirms the message related in the article. “And

the pleasure of [violence] is like the pleasure of cocaine or a good rough fuck.”

(Swofford, 64). In his work Why Men Love War (1984), William Broyles also proposes

this link between sex and war.

                       “It’s lure is the fundamental human passion to witness, to see

              things, what the Bible calls lust for the eye and the Marines in Vietnam

              called eye fucking […] Most men who have been to war, and most

              women who have been around it, remember that never in their lives did

              they have so heightened a sexuality. War is, in short, a turn-on.” (Broyles,

              1984).

       What seems to relieve the sexual tension these men feel are the, so called, Any

Marine letters. These are letters usually written by young women to provide

                                           33
encouragement to unknown fighting men. Obviously, the most valued letters are those,

which have explicit content.

                      “Atticus’s letter is […] from a recent university dropout: I just

               quit Yale. I like to fuck a lot and drop acid. Write me soon if you like to

               fuck a lot and drop acid. Thanks. Obviously, Atticus has hit the vein. The

               other Any Marines look defeated. […] I like to fuck a lot and drop acid

               becomes one of our rallying calls, better than Ohh-rah or Semper fi.

               Atticus writes the Acid Girl […] She never replies. This saddens us all.”

               (Swofford, 142)

       These letters are not meant to create any long term relationships. They are only

there to provide the authors with a feeling that they are doing their part for the Coalition

to Free Kuwait. The men gather for some fun and sometimes excitement (as it was with

the Acid Girl). The purpose is served and soon it is a burden. “Eventually so many Any

Marine letters are floating around battalion that they’ve become a nuisance.” (Swofford,

143)

       Troy tells Swofford to stop thinking about the Any Marines letters or the letters,

which Swofford writes to several women he had (or wishes) to have sex with. This

comes after Swofford receives photos from his mother’s wedding and since he is

obviously taken by those images Troy comments on them.

                      “[Troy] says, “Hell, Swoff, it looks to me like your mom just

               married some fat dude. Bitch didn’t even ask your permission […] she

               can’t wait for you to come home before she goes and gets married. […]”

                                            34
“I think some people are waiting […] Jenn and Katherine are

               waiting for me.”

                       “[…] Jenn and Katherine only know the bullshit you write to

               them. If you were in the States, they wouldn’t write those letters to you.”

               (Swofford, 148)

       In this excerpt Troy provides Swofford with explanations for reasons, why

different people write to Swofford. In the end of this scene Swofford undergoes a

drastic change of relationship with his mother. Lisa-Andrea Glatz comments on

Swofford’s relationship with women in her essay and remarks that the only all positive

relationship he has, a relationship which works for both sides involved, is the mother-

son relationship. (Glatz,

of the Gulf War and other Battles, 1). It comes as somewhat of an epiphany to Swofford

and he manages to realize that the world outside his war does not stop for other people,

who are not a part of the war effort, and wait for him. This realization brings him no

closer to clarity or comfort.

       5.4.3 THE PAIN OF (NOT) KILLING
       In this section I will focus on the two important scenes of the book, which

revolve around the acquisition of a kill. These scenes concern the possibility of killing a

friendly and Swofford’s first confirmed kill-to-be.

       Friendly fire ranks among the most lamentable things, which occur in war. Its

dictionary definition is follows:

       “friendly fire (noun), during a war, shooting that is hitting you from your own

                       side, not from the enemy“ (Cambridge Dictionary)

                                            35
This occurs in most cases accidentally, because the soldiers are, under normal

circumstances, careful enough not to endanger their fellow soldiers by inaccurate fire.

That was not Swofford’s case. What triggered the situation was the incompetence of

Swofford and his inability to promote clearly the benefits of staying awake during night

watch to Dettmann.

       Swofford got to be the highest ranking member of the team, while the team

leader was away and it was his duty to ensure that nothing goes poorly the night before

the team’s first opportunity for rifle time at a long range in three months. And things go

poorly as Dettmann falls asleep and the team oversleeps and misses their time at the

range (Swofford, 98).

       Since Swofford is the highest ranking person he also takes the fall for

Dettmann’s failure. The punishment is thorough- he is forced to drink vast quantities of

water and perform various calisthenics until he vomits only to repeat the cycle many

times over. But the worst punishment for Swofford is the shitter detail, where he is

supposed to burn the waste of the whole company for a week. He is eventually so

infuriated with Dettmann that he threatens him with his rifle loaded with live

ammunition.

                        “I know this is crazy and reckless, but I think Dettmann might

               learn something, I don’t know what. And I know that if in a second I say

               Fuck it and pull the trigger, I’ll be able to lie my way through an

               accidental discharge […] I’ll be the fuck out of Saudi Arabia and the

               endless waiting and the various other forms of mental and physical waste,

               and also, I’ll finally know what it feels like to kill a man.” (Swofford,

               103)
                                            36
You can also read