Planted forests in emerging economies - Best practices for sustainable and responsible investments - CIFOR

Planted forests in emerging economies - Best practices for sustainable and responsible investments - CIFOR

Planted forests in emerging economies
Best practices for sustainable and responsible investments

Lucio Brotto
Davide Pettenella
Paolo Cerutti
Romain Pirard

Planted forests in emerging economies
Best practices for sustainable and responsible investments

Lucio Brotto
Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry – University of Padova

Davide Pettenella
Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry – University of Padova

Paolo Cerutti
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)

Romain Pirard
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)

Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
Occasional Paper 151

© 2016 Center for International Forestry Research

             Content in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
             (CC BY 4.0),

ISBN 978-602-387-035-6
DOI: 10.17528/cifor/006136

Brotto L, Pettenella D, Cerutti P and Pirard R. 2016. Planted forests in emerging economies: Best practices for sustainable
and responsible investments. Occasional Paper 151. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.

Photo by Tri Saputro/CIFOR
White teak trees or Gmelina arborea in Lambakara village, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia

Jl. CIFOR, Situ Gede
Bogor Barat 16115

T +62 (251) 8622-622
F +62 (251) 8622-100

We would like to thank all funding partners who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund.
For a full list of the ‘CGIAR Fund’ funding partners please see:

Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIFOR, the
editors, the authors’ institutions, the financial sponsors or the reviewers.

List of abbreviations                                                         v
Glossary                                                                     vi
Acknowledgements                                                            vii
Executive summary                                                           viii
1 Introduction                                                                1
2 Objectives of the study                                                     3
3 Research background                                                         4
  3.1 Planted forest trends: An update                                        4
  3.2 Investments in planted forests                                          4
  3.3 Corporate social responsibility                                         5
  3.4 Sustainable and responsible investments (SRIs)                          5
  3.5 Strategies for selecting and investing in SRIs                          6
  3.6 SRIs in productive planted forests                                      8
4 Materials and methods                                                      9
  4.1 Description of SRIs                                                    9
  4.2 Quality assessment of SRI tools                                       10
5 Results                                                                   11
  5.1 Planted forests investment process                                    11
  5.2 SRI tools for the planted forests sector                              12
  5.3 SRI tools quality assessment                                          16
6 Conclusions                                                               22
  6.1 What are key characteristics of investments in planted forests?       22
  6.2 Which SRI tools are commonly used?                                    22
  6.3 What are the issues covered by SRI tools?                             23
  6.4 Which SRI tools do best in incorporating environmental,
      social and governance (ESG) issues?                                   23
  6.5 Recommendations                                                       24
7 References                                                                25
Annexes                                                                     30
   1       Historical overview of investments in planted forests            30
   2       Historical overview of sustainable and responsible investments   31
   3       Strategies of sustainable and responsible investments            32
   4       Stakeholders operating in the forest SRI sector                  33
   5       SRI tools descriptive variables                                  35
   6       Sections, subsections and number of issues                       39
   7       SRI tools database                                               40
   8       SRI tools description                                            46
   9       ESG reference document                                           51

     List of figures, tables and boxes

     1   Scope of the research.                                                             3
     2   Actors in sustainable and responsible investments in planted forests.             11
     3   Specificity of SRI tools by type of instrument. The number of codes of conduct
         is underestimated and only represents a sample.                                   12
     4   Governance structure of SRI tools by type of instrument.                          13
     5   Users of SRI tools by type of instrument.                                         14
     6   Number of SRI tools and level of control used by stakeholders.                    15
     7   Performance by type of SRI tools based on frequency of issues. In green,
         the occurrence of the issues is weighted with the level of control.               19
     8   Performance of SRI tools based on frequency of issues. In green, the occurrence
         of the issue in SRI tools is weighted by the corresponding level of control.      21

     1   Comparison of classification systems for SRI strategies.                          7
     2   Value and growth of SRI strategies in Europe, 2011–2013.                          7
     3   Role of planted forest investments in SRI strategies.                             8
     4   Example of a hierarchical framework consisting of a section, subsections,
         issues and verifiers for the assessment of SRI tools and their ESG criteria.      10
     5   Top three issues for each section.                                                17
     6   Top-ranking issues for each section including the level of control.               18
     7   Low-ranking issues for each section including the level of control.               18
     8   SRI tools with the highest performance by type.                                   20
List of abbreviations

AUM       Assets Under Management
CDM       Clean Development Mechanism
CSR       Corporate Social Responsibility
DAC       OECD Development Assistance Committee
EFAMA     European Fund and Asset Management Association
EIB       European Investment Bank
ESG       Environmental, Social and Governance
ESRA      The Assessment of Environmental and Social Risk in Loan and Investment Fund Applications
FDI       Foreign Direct Investment
FGHY      Fast Growing and High Yielding
FLEGT     Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade
FSC       Forest Stewardship Council
GSIA      Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (
ILO       International Labour Organization
IOs       International Organizations
IRR       Internal Rate of Return
ISEAL     International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling
JI        Joint Implementation
NGO       Nongovernmental Organization
ODA       Official Development Assistance
OECD      Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
PES       Payments for Environmental Services
PEFC      Programme for Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes
RBV       Resource-Based View
REDD+     Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation,
          sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in
          developing countries
SIF       Sustainable Investment Forum
SRI       Sustainable and Responsible Investment
SSIs      Sections, Subsections and Issues
TIMOs     Timber Investment Management Organizations
T-REITs   Timberland Real Estate Investment Trusts
UN        United Nations
UNFF      United Nations Forum on Forests
US        United States of America
USD       United States Dollar
VSS       Voluntary Sustainability Standards
WRI       World Resources Institute

Terminology        Definition                                                                                  Source
Corporate social   CSR includes a wide range of voluntary and regulatory instruments, including                European
responsibility     sustainable and responsible investments. CSR binds companies that voluntarily               Commission
(CSR)              integrate environmental and social concerns in their business operations and in their       (2011)
                   interactions with their stakeholders. CSR is expanding out of the corporate sector to
                   include organizations of all types and taking the name of Social Responsibility.
Emerging           Any area that is taking steps toward developing a market-oriented forest sector             Investopedia
market             economy, and has the potential to provide a viable and significant market for forest        (2016)
                   commodities or forest products.
Environmental,   Nonfinancial issues/risks/factors/indicators included in the investment process to            Investopedia
social and       screen investments.                                                                           (2016)
governance (ESG)
Institutional      These are investors such as pension funds, insurance companies and banks that               Davis and
investors          generally have substantial assets and experience in investments, and pool and               Steil (2004)
                   invest capital on behalf of corporations or private individuals. They also include
                   mutual funds, holding companies, brokerages and other funds. Foundations,
                   endowments and family offices are also very often grouped under and treated in
                   this category.
Investment         Investment companies are firms that invest the funds of investors (e.g. institutional  Investopedia
company            investors such as pension funds) in securities appropriate for their stated investment (2016)
                   objectives in return for a management fee. This category also includes investment
                   managers, asset managers, asset management companies, timber investment
                   management organizations (TIMOs) and real estate investment trusts (REITs).
Planted forests    Planted forests are areas of trees established through planting and/or deliberate           FAO (2010)
                   seeding of native or introduced species. Establishment is either through afforestation
                   on land that had previously not been classified as forest, or by reforestation of land
                   classified as forest, for instance after a fire or storm or following clear-felling.
Private equity     Private equity derives from investors and funds that invest directly in private             Investopedia
                   companies or conduct buyouts of public companies that results in a delisting of             (2016)
                   public equity.
Retail investors   Retail investors deal in securities only occasionally, and often deal in only small         Investopedia
                   quantities. They include individual investors, private investors, odd-lotters and           (2016)
                   small investors.
SRI                This refers to the set of organizations specifically dedicated to advocacy of SRI and       own
infrastructure     provision of SRI services (e.g. standard setters, certification bodies, SRI forums, etc.)   elaboration
SRI tools          SRI tools are a set of common tools (standards, guidelines, codes, etc.) to assure the      own
                   integration of ESG issues in the investment process. Examples are forest certification      elaboration
                   schemes, codes of conduct and investment rating systems.
Sustainable        SRI is a generic term covering any type of investment process that combines                 EUROSIF
and responsible    investors’ financial objectives with their concerns about environmental, social and         (2012a)
investment (SRI)   governance (ESG) issues. SRI is one of the voluntary approaches to promoting CSR.

This research was conducted with the financial support of the UKAID-funded KnowFOR (Forestry
Knowledge) program and the CGIAR research program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA). The
authors would like to acknowledge Benjamin Singer, Sepul Barua and Steven Lawry for the valuable
comments made to a previous version of this document.
Executive summary

Investments in industrial-scale planted forests have       the SRI tools’ capacity to incorporate and foster
grown exponentially in recent years, and current           positive impacts on ESG issues. The present study
assets under management total USD 70–80 billion,           therefore has two objectives: first, to identify,
up from about USD 1 billion in 1980. Once                  describe and analyze the tools that have been
almost exclusively focused on timber production,           designed in order to promote SRIs in planted
investments are now rapidly broadening their               forests; and second, to suggest a framework for
scope to embrace products and services that                the evaluation of SRI tools vis-à-vis their capacity
include ecosystem services, bioenergy and certified        to address ESG issues in relation to investments
forest products. Planted forests are included into         in planted forests, with a longer-term aim of
investment portfolios for various reasons, ranging         improving the SRI tools of the future.
from diversification and risk mitigation strategies –
which are reinforced when investments also rely on         An analysis of 121 investments in emerging
indicators of sustainable forest management – to           economies enabled us to identify 339
attractive rates of return.                                organizations (i.e. stakeholders involved in the
                                                           SRI process) and 50 SRI tools. The description
Concurrently, the rapid growth of investments in           and subsequent classification of SRI tools was
plantations, notably in the tropics, has fostered          based on several variables, including:
controversies that are becoming more prominent             • type of tool, based on nine categories:
and critical and that need to be faced by investors.          investment index, code of conduct,
In particular, such rapid growth may incur negative           reporting standard, investment guideline,
social and environmental impacts of planted                   legality benchmark, investment standard,
forests, such as soil erosion and degradation, water          investment rating, bank investment policy,
cycle disruption, pests and diseases, and conversion          management standard
of natural forests. These can result in biodiversity       • specificity of the tools, from those with a
loss or the abuse of local and indigenous                     broad scope to those focusing on forests
communities’ rights within productive planted                 (including planted forests) and on planted
forests, notably plantations with monocultures                forests only
of exotic species under intensive management               • governance, depending on the involvement
practices. These are major reasons why investment             of businesses, governments, NGOs or
companies and fund managers are increasingly                  academic institutions
interested in using sustainable and responsible            • users and where the tools interfere in the
investment (SRI) tools (e.g. standards, guidelines,           investment process, including processing
and codes of conduct) that help them ascertain                industries, plantation companies, investors,
whether planted forests assets are ‘safe’ or ‘risk-free’      investment companies and asset managers
as far as environmental, social and governance             • level of control induced by the SRI tools to
(ESG) issues are concerned. Indeed, more than                 ensure that ESG requirements are met, from
30% of the professionally managed assets are today            control of some initial steps (e.g. getting
assessed as being managed in a ‘sustainable and               a signature to a declaration of intents, or
responsible’ manner.                                          agreeing to participate in networks and
                                                              forums aiming at the better inclusion
However, a classification system for SRI tools in             of ESG issues into business models), to
the field of planted forests still lacks consensus,           effective compliance with the more stringent
which in turn implies a knowledge gap in terms of             certification schemes.

Results indicate that the most common SRI           The SRI tools with the highest overall performance
tools used to date are management standards         among the 50 SRI tools analyzed were found
(e.g. the Forest Stewardship Council’s              to be those of the Forest Stewardship Council
standards, called the FSC Forest Certification      (FSC) and Gold Standard: they monitor more
Scheme), bank investment policies (e.g. ABN         issues and ensure greater quality of control (e.g.
AMRO Forest and Plantation Policy) and              third-party independent certification) than do
investment rating systems (e.g. RepRisk).           other entities. RepRisk, Certified B Corporation,
SRI tools usually have a broad sectoral scope.      ABN AMRO Forest and Plantation Policy, WWF
Only a few tools are specific to planted forests.   Responsible Investment Guide, FairForest and the
Business-oriented organizations produce and         FTSE4Good Index Series were also found to have
manage about 60% of the SRI tools assessed,         high performance.
followed by NGOs (16%), which in recent
years have played a more relevant role in the       Overall, findings indicate that very few SRI tools
development of management standards.                are designed in ways that take adequate account of
                                                    the specific social and environmental sustainability
The classification of the 50 SRI tools based on     issues relevant to planted forests. In fact, SRI tools
the abovementioned set of variables allowed         focus mainly on issues appropriate to assessing the
us to define an ESG Reference Document for          management of natural forest rather than that of
quality assessment of the SRI tools. Results        planted forests (e.g. they assess aspects related to
indicate that the most important issues             illegal logging and high conservation value forests,
highlighted in the available SRI tools used to      which are only partially relevant for plantations).
assess the tools’ ESG performance are: legality
of operations, environmental impact assessment      This is an important shortcoming of the current
requirements, third-party certification,            SRI tools and we recommend the development
consideration of tenure rights, impacts on forest   of SRI tools developed specifically for productive
degradation, stakeholders’ communication and        plantations. For practitioners, policy makers
presence of policies related to climate change.     and local populations, it is indeed important
                                                    that planted forests are evaluated either through
Conversely, issues such as poverty alleviation,     specific SRI tools, or at least with appropriate
minimum percentage of protected areas and           consideration given to the specific situation of
prevention of encroachment were found not           planted forests within existing, broader, SRI tools.
to be properly addressed or monitored in            In particular, it is critical that key aspects such as
current SRI tools. This is an important finding     the improvement of livelihoods, and the prevention
because such topics carry significant risks for     and management of encroachment and conflicts
investments if not properly monitored or            are properly addressed, and indeed thoroughly
controlled for.                                     monitored, in improved future SRI tools.
1           Introduction

The area of land covered with planted forests is       and indigenous communities) generate serious
growing worldwide. According to FAO (2010),            concerns (Morrison and Bass 1992; Cossalter
since 1990, planted forests have been increasing       and Pye-Smith 2003; Bowyer et al. 2005; Van
mostly in tropical and subtropical countries in Asia   Bodegom et al. 2008; Lawson et al. 2014).
and South America by 4.3 million ha/year. Planted
forests correspond to 7% of the global forest area     The concerns about the negative impacts of
and cover an area of 264 million ha.                   planted forests are all the more critical because:
                                                       • retail investors look to increase their market
Today, 30% of all industrial roundwood                    share and are less likely to care about
production is sourced from these planted forests          social and environmental impacts than are
(Jürgensen et al. 2014). Planted forests are              institutional investors (Simula 2008)
expected to overtake natural forests in production     • planted forests are mostly expanding in
to reach 75–100% of industrial timber production          countries (often tropical and subtropical)
by 2050 (Sohngen et al. 1999; Evans and Turnbull          characterized by fragile social situations and
2004; Carle and Holmgren 2008). Warman (2013)             relatively poor law enforcement compared
convincingly describes how the peak of production         with conventional areas of investment
from natural forests occurred in 1989 worldwide.          such as the USA (Voegtlin et al. 2011;
                                                          Zhanget al. 2014)
The expansion of planted forests is traditionally      • productive planted forests will be prioritized
linked to the demand for wood fibers and biomass          over protective ones and will entail higher
for energy, but nowadays planted forests are              social and environmental risks.
also counted on for climate change mitigation
and adaptation, e.g. the Clean Development             Considerable resources are required for the
Mechanism (CDM) and Reducing Emissions from            establishment of planted forests; here, upfront
Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+)           investments are critical for their development
schemes (Scheyvens and Lopez-Casero 2009;              and largely determine the quality of their
Hamilton et al. 2010; Stanton et al. 2010). In the     design and functioning. The investment aspects
context of declining relative timber production        therefore play a decisive role and deserve scrutiny.
from natural forests and expanding planted forest      Currently, USD 70–80 billion is invested in
estates, the estate managers might be credited         timberlands1 all over the world, with over 70% in
for their capacity to support forest conservation      the USA alone (Nicklin and Cornwell 2012).
(Pirard et al. 2016).
                                                       Increasingly, investment companies and funds
Planted forests are increasingly seen as a source      willing to invest in timberland, and particularly
of forest products and services able to also deliver   in productive planted forests, adopt so-called
environmental, social and economic benefits (Boyle     sustainable and responsible investment (SRI)
et al. 1999; Bull et al. 2006; Carle and Holmgren      strategies (EUROSIF 2010; UNECE/FAO
2008; UNEP 2009). However, the negative social         2014). For example, investors may want to
and environmental impacts of planted forests           invest only in timber plantations where the
(e.g. water cycle disruption, soil erosion and
degradation, biodiversity loss, pests and diseases,
conversion of natural forests and abuse of local       1 Timberlands include both natural and planted forests.
2   |   Lucio Brotto, Davide Pettenella, Paolo Cerutti and Romain Pirard

        managing company adopts and implements                             Increasingly, however, they aim to ensure that
        measures targeted at reducing conflicts with the                   a particular set of environmental, social and
        local populations. To implement such a screening                   governance (ESG) risks are properly addressed
        strategy, investment companies and fund managers                   in the investment process. In technical jargon,
        would need to rely on standards, guidelines, codes                 investment companies and fund managers adopt
        of conduct or other directive (hereinafter called                  SRI strategies that make use of SRI tools to
        SRI tools). There are many SRI tools, which                        guarantee that their investments do not cause
        may vary in their format and their objectives.                     negative ESG impacts.
2           Objectives of the study

The concept of sustainable and responsible                Thus, taking stock of the increasing interest
investment (SRI) is evolving, with new financial          in investments in planted forest, especially in
service providers developing methods and                  tropical countries, this study has the following
approaches to include ESG issues in their business-       two objectives:
as-usual scenarios. Indeed, the market for sustainable    • to describe existing sustainable and responsible
investments increased from USD 13.3 trillion in               investment tools adopted in planted forests
2012 to USD 21.4 trillion in 2014, and it represents          in emerging markets and to identify their key
today more than 30% of professionally managed                 characteristics; this is supported by a survey of
assets globally (GSIA 2014). Retail and institutional         the most used SRI tools
organizations are showing a significant interest          • to evaluate the performance of SRI tools based
in ‘socially responsible,’ ‘green,’ ‘sustainable’ or          on the number of environmental, social and
‘ethical’ investments, seen as being due to the media         governance (ESG) issues considered, namely the
and social pressure. In some cases, a socially and            nonfinancial issues and risk indicators included
environmentally responsible behavior is adopted as            in the investment process.
a result of new commitments by the shareholders
and top managers, typically on a voluntary basis,         Our scope and objectives can also be represented as
to reduce risks and to promote more effective             shown in Figure 1.
marketing strategies.

To prove that investments are ‘ethical,’ ‘green’ or
other, the adoption of various standards, guidelines                            Investors (and investment companies)
or other directives (SRI tools) has been growing
constantly in recent decades (EUROSIF 2014).                                                              use
Yet, such an increase in self-defined ‘sustainable’
investments or in the use of various SRI tools is not                                         SRI tools
matched by any agreed classification system for SRI           Scope of the                            to ensure proper
tools. As a result, it is very difficult for investment      study critically                         consideration of
companies, funds, and indeed shareholders to                    analyzed
really understand how their money is promoting                                           ESG aspects in SRI
positive environmental and social impacts.
                                                                                                          for achieving
For people making investment decisions and
managing assets, it is a challenge to understand                                   Corporate social responsibility
the differences between the range of available
financial products. At a national level, markets
may require differing strategies depending on local       Figure 1. Scope of the research.
investors’ preferences, with associated differing
approaches and products to guide the investments
(Sievänen et al. 2012).
3           Research background

3.1 Planted forest trends: An update                    of their assets under management in the USA
                                                        increased dramatically from around USD 1
The focus of this study is on productive planted        billion to USD 10–12 billion (Zinkhan et al.
forests, where investments are massive. Productive      1992). In the early 2000s, TIMOs expanded
planted forests produce either or both non-             into emerging markets (e.g. Brazil), where forest
timber forest products (rubber) and wood (e.g.          assets exhibit higher risk–return profiles. In
timber). Fast growing and high yielding (FGHY)          South America and Asia, the area of planted
plantations cover an area of 54.3 million ha            forests has been increasing due to conducive
worldwide, excluding rubber and nonindustrial           biophysical conditions, low production costs,
fuelwood plantations (Indufor 2012). The USA,           proximity to emerging markets and acceptable
China and Brazil are the countries with the             risk levels. Rising land prices in emerging
largest areas of planted forests, each having over 5    markets can be considered an indicator of
million ha of FGHY plantations (Indufor 2012).          this growth.
Productive planted forests are intensively managed
in order to generate high financial returns, and        As of today, 50–70% of timberland investments
thus are usually based on mono-specific and exotic      are still located in the USA (Asen et al. 2012).
species (e.g. Pinus spp. and Eucalyptus spp.). Yet,     More than 1000 organizations (e.g. planted
they are also associated with greater negative          forests owners, investors and managers) are
environmental impacts compared with protective          involved in the investment process (Indufor
planted forests.                                        2012). Admittedly, planted forests usually
                                                        represent no more than 2–3% of the total
In many developing and emerging countries, the          investment portfolio of institutional investors
expansion of production and export of wood              (Staub-Bisang 2011), but this sector plays an
products in recent years has been made possible         important role in balancing overall risks by
by the raw material supplied from plantations           many investment funds.
(FAO 2014).
                                                        Nowadays, roughly USD 70–80 billion is
                                                        invested in planted forests, up from less than
3.2 Investments in planted forests                      USD 1 billion in 1980 (FAO 2012; and
                                                        Annex 1). Institutional investors have played
Timberland investments started in the USA in the        a prominent role in the expansion of tropical
early 1980s, in relation to the significant growth of   planted forests in the past, but completion is
planted forests ownership by institutional investors    growing with more retail investors entering
(Rinehart 2010). The ownership of planted forests       the market (Laaksonen-Craig 2004). The
shifted from strategic investors (forest industry,      major reason for investing in planted forests
energy and mining companies as well as soft             is wood production, but the supply of some
commodity traders and local landowners) to              ecosystem services (e.g. carbon credits) has
institutional investors. This phenomenon generated      also been gaining prominence in recent years.
an upsurge of timberland real estate investment         Numerous studies have shown the multiple
trusts (T-REITs) and timberland investment              benefits of introducing planted forests into
management organizations (TIMOs). In the                investment portfolios. Relevant benefits (HTRG
1990s, the number of TIMOs and the amount               2003; Lausti 2004; Scholtens and Spierdijk
Planted forests in emerging economies   |   5

2008; Lutz 2009; Toppinen and Zhang 2010;                           According to the existing literature (Jenkins
Fu 2012) include:                                                   and Smith 1999; Kurucz et al. 2008; Vidal
• low correlation with other asset classes – the rate               and Kozak 2008; KPMG 2011a), the major
   of return on planted forests investments is not                  reasons for companies to engage with CSR
   correlated with returns on other financial assets                are to i) increase transparency and minimize
   (such as equity, fixed income and commercial                     reputational risks; ii) reduce costs connected to
   real estate), and thus decreases the overall risks in            lawsuits, boycott campaigns, etc.; iii) gain market
   an investment portfolio                                          competitiveness (e.g. avoid loss of market share,
• competitive risk-adjusted rates of return –                       enter new markets and obtain a price premium);
   historically, plantation investments have                        iv) improve reputation and legitimacy; and v)
   provided appealing average returns in relation to                integrate stakeholders’ interests with the purpose
   their volatility, especially in emerging countries               of creating win–win synergistic value activities.
• inflation hedging – planted forests are an
   inflation hedge, being the rate of returns in
   real terms from forests positively correlated                    3.4 Sustainable and responsible
   with inflation2                                                  investments (SRIs)
• green and social credentials – investment risks
   can increasingly be reduced, while brand and                     Sustainable and responsible investments (SRIs)
   reputational values can be increased through                     have their roots in the concept of ethical finance
   certification and other SRI tools that can provide               that was initially developed in religious spheres
   evidence that the forests are managed sustainably.               (Kinder and Domini 1998; Louche et al. 2012).
                                                                    In the 1930s, religious groups in the USA started
                                                                    to exclude investments in alcohol and tobacco
3.3 Corporate social responsibility                                 and instead supported pro-poor investments
                                                                    (Annex 2). In recent decades, SRIs have
The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR)                undergone dramatic growth further fueled by the
was first defined in scientific studies in the 1980s                2007–2008 financial crisis (Becchetti and Fucito
(Carroll 1999). Notwithstanding the name and                        1999; Turcotte and M’Zali 2004; KPMG 2011;
the initial focus on social aspects, CSR is nowadays                Richardson 2013; Benn et al. 2014; EUROSIF
increasingly aligned with the topic of sustainability,              2014; Scholtens 2014).
encompassing governance, environmental and
financial aspects (Vidal and Kozak 2008).                           It is reported that SRIs represent USD 13.6
                                                                    trillion (GSIA 2012), an estimated 21.8% of
In the forest sector, CSR instruments appeared                      all assets under management (AUM). Europe is
in the early 1990s (Cashore 2002) driven by i)                      by far the largest current SRI market and, with
the failure of policy instruments (command and                      the USA and Canada, accounts for 96% of the
control instruments) in promoting the sustainable                   AUM (KPMG 2013). Institutional investors
management of natural resources; ii) an increased                   lead the demand for SRI, representing 94% of
role of civil society in decision making, shifting                  the European market (EUROSIF 2014). Both
from ‘government’ to ‘governance’; iii) the                         institutional and retail investors are increasingly
internationalization of companies, and the shifting                 entering the SRI sector, generating more
of operations to less developed countries with poor                 than 10% annual growth rate (Allianz 2010;
law enforcement and fragile social situations (Heal                 VIGEO 2012; EUROSIF 2014). In Europe
2008; Voegtlin et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2014); iv)                 in 2013, the most common SRI financial
growing difficulties of governments in regulating                   products were equities (50%) followed by
and monitoring transnational corporations                           bonds (40%) (EUROSIF 2014). The demand
and the financial market; and v) the ‘rolling                       for SRIs is mostly driven by consumers,
back the frontiers of the state’ with a transfer of                 and then captured by institutional investors
environmental and social decisions from the state to                motivated by the reputational risks (Allianz
the corporate sphere (Heal 2008).                                   2010; EUROSIF 2014). At the same time, a
                                                                    growing number of wealthy individuals (or high
2 Wood-based products can be used in a wide variety of              net worth individuals), who are traditionally
sectors (paper, energy, construction, etc.); thus, investments in   very cautious, are also entering the SRI market
planted forests can potentially hedge against inflation.            (EUROSIF 2012b).
6   |   Lucio Brotto, Davide Pettenella, Paolo Cerutti and Romain Pirard

        From traditional exclusion screening                               3.5 Strategies for selecting and
        strategies (e.g. no pornography and no                             investing in SRIs
        weapons), the introduction of ratings
        and metrics has diversified SRI strategies,                        Many different initiatives and SRI forums
        moving toward a broader approach aimed at                          around the globe promote the integration of
        changing the business behavior of companies                        environmental, social and governance (ESG)
        (Dillenburg et al. 2003).                                          criteria into conventional finance, resulting in
                                                                           confusion about the definition of SRIs (Scholtens
        Despite the large theoretical support behind                       2014). For the purpose of this study, SRIs are
        the assumption ‘the more responsible, the more                     defined as “any type of investment process that
        profitable,’ and some empirical studies revealing                  combines investors’ financial objectives with
        a positive correlation between responsibility                      their concerns about Environmental, Social and
        and financial performances (Feldman et al.                         Governance (ESG) issues” (EUROSIF 2012a,
        1997; Loucks et al. 2004; UNEP and Mercer                          8). The choice of EUROSIF’s (2012a) definition
        2007; Bouslah et al. 2010), most studies agree                     is motivated by the fact that the European SRI
        that there is no statistical difference between                    market is the largest one and that EUROSIF
        the financial performances of conventional and                     provides constant up-to-date market trend analysis
        responsible investment funds (Hamilton et al.                      of SRI strategies.
        1993; Hoepner and McMillan 2009; Leite and
        Cortez 2014; Scholtens 2014).                                      In addition, different organizations adopt
                                                                           different strategies or criteria through which SRIs
        Yet several studies (Figge 2001; Hoepner and                       are defined and selected or excluded from the
        McMillan 2009; Cortez et al. 2012; Leite                           investment portfolios. At least five organizations
        and Cortez 2014; Scholtens 2014) report                            are categorizing SRI strategies (Table 1):
        that the lack of positive correlation between                      the European Fund and Asset Management
        responsibility and profitability is impaired                       Association (EFAMA), EUROSIF, the United
        by methodological arguments such as                                Nations Principle for Responsible Investments
        the following:                                                     (PRI) initiative, the Global Sustainable
        • SRI is not a straightforward concept and its                     Investment Alliance (GSIA) and the Association
           applications are heterogeneous. Different                       of the Luxembourg Fund Industry (ALFI).
           SRI strategies can be applied and they might
           have different impacts on returns.                              The five classification systems appear to be
        • A clear definition of SRI is missing, with the                   coherent and identify in total seven SRI strategies.
           upper and lower limits being confused with                      GSIA and EUROSIF use almost identical
           philanthropic investments and conventional                      categorizations. ALFI gives priority to the ESG
           ones, respectively.                                             component in the investment process. This
        • The current internationalization process                         method separates SRI into ESG cross-sectoral,
           of investment funds could allow SRIs to                         ESG environment, ESG social, ESG governance
           achieve better portfolio diversification in                     and Ethics cross-sectoral. The PRI classification
           the medium term. Nowadays, while it is in                       system lacks Impact Investing. EFAMA separates
           fact easier to find conventional investments                    SRI strategies into two groups. The first is based
           rather than SRIs in emerging economies,                         on screening and includes Exclusion, Best-in-
           this trend is likely to change in the future.                   Class, Thematic approach and Norms-based
        • The financial performance of SRI funds                           approach. The second group is based on active
           can benefit in the medium term from the                         ownership and includes Engagement and Voting.
           inclusion of climate change risks.
                                                                           For the purpose of this study, the classification
        With a growing number of tools (e.g. standards,                    system of EUROSIF is preferred as it best reflects
        guidelines, codes of conduct) serving the                          the approaches of all classification systems, and
        demand for SRIs, a clear classification system                     is frequently used in Europe, the largest global
        is thus needed in order to better investigate                      market for SRIs. EUROSIF (2012a) defines
        potential synergies between responsibility                         seven strategies for SRIs (a detailed analysis of the
        and profitability.                                                 seven strategies is provided in Annex 3):
Planted forests in emerging economies   |   7

Table 1. Comparison of classification systems for SRI strategies.
 EUROSIF              GSIA                       PRI                            EFAMA                 ALFI
 Exclusion            ESG Negative screening ESG Negative/Exclusionary Screening:                     Negative screening
                                             screening                  −− Negative                   and Ethics
 Norms-based          Norms-based screening Norms-based screening          screening or               Negative screening
 screening                                                                 Exclusion                  and Ethics
                                                                        −− Norms-
 Best-in-Class        ESG Positive screening ESG Positive screening and    based                      Positive screening
 selection            and Best-in-Class      Best-in-Class                 approach
 Sustainability       Sustainability themed  ESG-themed investments     −− Best-in-Class              ESG social and
 themed                                                                 −− Thematic                   environmental
 ESG Integration      ESG Integration            Integration of ESG issues      -                     ESG cross-sectoral
 Engagement and       Corporate engagement Engagement (three types)             Engagement            ESG governance
 Voting               and shareholder action                                    (Voting)
 Impact Investing     Impact/Community           -                              -                     Social impact,
                      investing                                                                       microfinance funds
Source: adapted from EUROSIF (2012a, 2014) and KPMG (2013).

• Exclusion is an approach that excludes specific             Table 2. Value and growth of SRI strategies in
  investments or classes of investment (e.g.                  Europe, 2011–2013.
  companies, sectors or entire countries) from the
                                                                                         Value (€ Million)
  investment portfolio. Exclusion is among the                 SRI Strategies                                       CAGRa
  oldest and most common strategies and is based                                        2011            2013
  on negative screening.                                       Exclusions           3,584,498        6,853,954     +38.3%
• ESG Integration is the explicit inclusion by asset           ESG Integration      3,164,066        5,232,120     +28.6%
  managers of ESG risks and opportunities into
                                                               Norms-based          2,132,394        3,633,794     +30.5%
  traditional financial analysis and investment                screening
  decisions based on a systematic process and
  appropriate research sources.                                Engagement           1,762,687        3,275,930     +36.3%
                                                               and Voting
• Norms-based screening is the screening of
  investments according to their compliance with               Best-in-Class         283,081           353,555     +11.8%
  international standards and norms.                           Sustainability            48,046          58,961    +10.8%
• Engagement and Voting is based on engagement                 themed
  activities and active ownership through voting of            Impact                     8,750          20,269    +52.2%
  shares and engagement with companies on ESG                  Investing
  matters. This is a long-term process, seeking to
                                                              a   compound annual growth rate
  influence behavior or increase disclosure.
• Best-in-Class is an approach where leading or               Source: (EUROSIF 2014).
  best-performing investments (within a category
  or class) are selected or weighted based on
  ESG criteria.                                                   impacts alongside a financial return. Impact
• Sustainability themed is an investment in                       investing can be made in both emerging and
  themes or assets linked to the implementation                   developed markets, and targets a range of
  of sustainable measures. Thematic funds                         returns from below-market to the market rate,
  focus on specific or multiple issues related to                 depending on the circumstances.
  environmental and social sustainability, as well
  as the implementation of measures that foster               Often, several strategies are used in conjunction,
  good governance.                                            so it is not easy to divide current investments into
• Impact Investing relates to investments made                clear-cut classes. Yet, with that caveat in mind, it is
  in companies, organizations and funds with the              clear that all the strategies have fast growing rates
  intention of generating social and environmental            (Table 2).
8   |   Lucio Brotto, Davide Pettenella, Paolo Cerutti and Romain Pirard

        3.6 SRIs in productive planted forests                               EUR 3.1 billion of AUM (KPMG 2013). Forest
                                                                             investment funds may also apply other strategies,
        Although both the number of SRI tools and                            such as Impact Investing, ESG Integration and
        investments in productive planted forests are                        Best-in-Class (Table 3).
        increasing (EUROSIF 2010), few studies have
        investigated their interactions. The most widely                     Current initiatives such as the International Social
        adopted strategy in planted forest-related                           and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling
        investments is the ‘Sustainability themed’ one                       (ISEAL) Alliance for the definition of relevant
        (EFAMA 2014; EUROSIF 2014), i.e. a strategy                          indicators, the Committee on Sustainability
        that looks for investments with a focus on specific                  Assessment for impacts measurement, and the
        or multiple issues related to environmental and                      International Centre for Trade and Sustainable
        social sustainability, as well as the implementation                 Development’s database with the Standards Map
        of measures that foster good governance in                           project, could collectively increase the knowledge
        the forest sector. As many as 31 forest-related                      on impact measurement methodologies and
        funds were registered in 2012, accounting for                        indicators (ITC 2011).

        Table 3. Role of planted forest investments in SRI strategies.
         Strategy           How does it work?                    Applicability to planted forestsa     Example
         Sustainability     Transitioning to more                HIGH: forestry-dedicated funds.       From noncertified to certified
         themed             sustainable consumption              Also climate funds                    forests
                            and production
         ESG                Integrating financial                MEDIUM: use of due diligence          Use of Forest Footprint
         Integration        analysis with ESG risks and          approach. Requires field visit        Disclosure for the inclusion of
                            opportunities                                                              risks. Use of FSC certification
                                                                                                       as a framework for risk
         Impact             Generating measurable                MEDIUM: favored by the                Generally small projects
         investing          social and environmental             advanced level of sustainability      as microfinance schemes.
                            impacts (e.g. improved               measurement in the forest             Initiatives such as the Impact
                            forest management in                 sector (e.g. forest management        Reporting and Investment
                            developing countries,                certification). Also connected to     Standards (IRIS) or Global
                            REDD+, CDM and JI projects)          climate change                        Impact Investing Rating
                                                                                                       Systems (GIIRS)
         Best-in-Class      Selecting top ESG                    MEDIUM: for large pulp and            Using rating systems to check
                            companies within a sector            paper companies listed on the         best-performing pulp and
                            for placement in portfolio           stock change                          paper mill companies
         Exclusion          Removing companies or                LOW: usually applied at the           Removing the forestry
                            sectors from portfolio               sector level, mostly refers to        sector from the portfolio
                                                                 controversial issues (weapons,        due to the issue of primary
                                                                 tobacco, gambling, nuclear            forests conversion. Can be
                                                                 power, etc.). More likely to          used for planted forests
                                                                 be applied for natural forests        using genetically modified
                                                                 management and conservation           organisms or exotic species
         Norms-based        Using international norms            LOW: international norms              Based on UN Global Compact,
         screening          and standards for company            mostly targeting natural forests.     any company involved in
                            selections                           Potential applicability with          corruption is excluded from
                                                                 FLEGT. Voluntary standards not        the portfolio
                                                                 yet included
         Engagement         Influencing other                    LOW: engaging through forestry        Increasing transparency on
         and Voting         shareholders on ESG                  funds boards                          funds remunerations
        a The level of applicability expresses the ease of adapting the SRI strategy to investments in planted forests. High: already
        applied, Medium: possibility of application, Low: rarely applicable.
        Source: EFAMA (2014); EUROSIF (2014).
4              Materials and methods

4.1 Description of SRIs                                           reports and finally with direct interviews by phone
                                                                  or at conferences. The SRI tools eligible for the
A total of 121 planted forests investments and                    survey had to meet two requirements:
339 organizations3 using SRI tools in emerging                     • being applicable to planted forests (those
economies have been inventoried and analyzed.                        tools applicable only to natural forests
Investments and organizations have been identified                   were excluded)
through web searches, interviews with key                         • being already applied in at least one on-going
stakeholders and participation at conferences.                       planted forest investment project (for example,
Following an investment process approach (i.e. an                    the FAO’s Voluntary Guidelines for the
approach that considers the sequence of actions                      Responsible Management of Planted Forests
implemented to i) understand the risks, ii) choose                   was not considered in this review because it
the portfolio and iii) evaluate the performance                      was not in use for the investments considered).
based on investors’ preferences), our survey set
out to classify into three groups the organizations               As stated above, there is no widely accepted
operating with planted forests investments                        classification system for SRI tools. Lammerts
(Annex 4):                                                        Van Bueren and Blom (1997) and subsequently
• Ordinary market players: organizations                          Holvoet and Muys (2004) introduced some
   operating with planted forests investments,                    basic elements for a classification, later refined by
   either conventionally or with dedicated SRI                    Masiero and Secco (2013) and described them
   strategies; these organizations can relate more                according to the following variables (please refer
   (e.g. TIMOs and planted forests companies)                     to Annex 5 for further methodological details on
   or less (e.g. European Investment Bank)                        the classification of SRI tools):
   specifically to the forest sector                              • Type: what type of tool is it (e.g. a bank
• Players managing SRI infrastructure:                                investment policy, or a code of conduct, etc.)?
   organizations specifically dedicated to advocacy               • Specificity: is it a forest-specific or broader
   of SRIs and provision of SRI-related services                      scope tool?
   (e.g. standard setters, certification bodies,                  • Governance: which type of organization
   forums, etc.)                                                      develops and manages the tool?
• Governments and civil society: mostly                           • Investment process stage: who uses the tool
   networks, NGOs, associations and                                   (e.g. an investor, a plantation company, etc.)?
   intergovernmental organizations having a stake                 • Level of control: how is the implementation
   in planted forests investments but not directly                    of the instrument controlled?
   participating in the investment process or                     • First time to be made public: when was the
   provision of SRI-related services.                                 SRI tool first made public?
                                                                  • Geographical origin: where was the tool
Tools used by the three groups of players have been                   first produced?
identified through an analysis of the literature,                 • Geographical application: where is the tool
SRI infrastructure and investment directories, SRI                    implemented/implementable?
stakeholders’ websites, environmental and social                  • Coordination with other tools: to what
                                                                      extent is there coordination or cross-
                                                                      referencing with other tools?
3    For the purpose of the study, an organization is an actor    • Market share: what are the impacted area and/
involved in the sustainable and responsible investment process.       or number of companies using it?
10   |     Lucio Brotto, Davide Pettenella, Paolo Cerutti and Romain Pirard

         4.2 Quality assessment of SRI tools                                     primary forests and wetlands is frequently
                                                                                 found in SRI tools with different wording (e.g.
         After the identification and characterization of                        humid forests, protection of wetlands, intact
         SRI tools using the abovementioned variables, a                         forest landscape, tropical forests, native forests,
         quality assessment of how they adopt or consider                        primary forests, etc.). For each issue, a list of
         environmental, social and governance (ESG)                              verifiers for field evidence assessment has also
         criteria was performed. The quality assessment                          been developed.
         consists of the following steps:                                     2. Gap analysis of each single SRI tool in
         1. Preparation of an ESG Reference Document                             comparison with the ESG Reference
              starting from existent planted forests standards                   Document in terms of how many issues are
              and quality assessment frameworks (Lammerts                        considered by the single SRI tool. Gap analysis
              Van Bueren and Blom 1997; Holvoet and                              is a well-known technique for the analysis
              Muys 2004; Merger 2008; WWF 2008;                                  of forest management standards (Ferrucci
              Merger et al. 2011; Masiero and Secco 2013;                        2004; Hickey and Innes 2005; Masiero and
              Masiero et al. 2015). The ESG Reference                            Secco 2013).
              Document refers to a hierarchical framework                     3. Assignment of control factors to account
              made of sections, subsections and issues (SSIs).                   for the level of control of each SRI tool. Four
              An example is reported in Table 4. A final set                     levels of control and, more specifically, eight
              of 7 sections, 22 subsections and 155 issues                       control strategies have been included.
              was produced (Annex 6). The first set of SSIs                   4. SRI classification system that brings together
              is the one formulated by Holvoet and Muys                          a number of issues addressed by each single
              (2004) and further refined by Masiero and                          SRI tool, the control factors and categorization
              Secco (2013). New SSIs encountered during                          by type of instrument.
              the analysis of SRIs have been included in
              the ESG Reference Document. An example                          Furthermore, the SSIs with the highest frequency
              is the section ‘Climate change and ecosystem                    in SRI tools have been identified. In theory and
              services,’ which emerged during the analysis                    for the purpose of this study, issues occurring in
              of forest carbon standards. Similar issues were                 several different SRI tools are expected to be more
              grouped together. For example, the aspect                       important than those occurring only in a few
              of conservation and avoided conversion of                       SRI tools.

         Table 4. Example of a hierarchical framework consisting of a section, subsections, issues and verifiers
         for the assessment of SRI tools and their ESG criteria.
          Section          Subsections          Issues                                                 Verifiers
          Legal and        Legislation          Respect of locally and nationally applicable           −− Penalties and fees since
          institutional                         laws and regulations                                      project starting date
          framework                                                                                    −− Complaints by stakeholders
                                                                                                          and NGOs
                                                Compatibility with international or national           …
                                                agreements signed by the hosting country
                                                Conformity to labor legislation (e.g. ILO standards)   …
                           Illegal logging      …                                                      …
                           Property             …                                                      …
         Source: own elaboration.
5           Results

5.1 Planted forests investment                                          agencies collaborate with both investment
process                                                                 companies and plantation and processing
                                                                        companies providing guidelines, research and other
In the planted forests investment process, the                          services. At the level of plantation companies, a
financial flow typically goes from institutional                        specific advocacy role is carried out by plantation
and retail investors to investment companies and                        associations (i.e. associations of planted forests
involves financial pooling operators such as banks                      owners providing technical and advocacy services,
and funds (Figure 2).                                                   such as the Uganda Timber Growers Association –
                                                                        UTGA). In some cases, plantation associations can
Investment companies allocate investments to                            also be fully integrated with investors, investment
plantation companies, which are eventually                              companies and processing industries (e.g. the
integrated with processing industries. International                    case of The Brazilian Tree Industry – Ibá). NGOs
organizations and research and consultancy                              usually focus more on advocacy and campaigning

                   Institutional Investors           Retail Investors

                                                                            SRI Associations and                      Bodies
                                                                           Forums, SRI Directories
                                     Funds & Banks
                                                                                                          SRI Standards
   Organizations                                                                 SRI Rating
     (IOs) and                        Investment
     Research                        Companies or
   Organizations                    Asset Managers


    NGOs                                                                                  SRI Consultants
                                                                                           and Advisors


  Governments &        Market Players              SRI
   Civil Society                             Infrastructure    Financial Flow       Services & Advocacy     Quality Assurance

Figure 2. Actors in sustainable and responsible investments in planted forests.
12   |     Lucio Brotto, Davide Pettenella, Paolo Cerutti and Romain Pirard

         at the level of plantation and processing companies                     are management standards (11), followed by
         where they are located on the ground, rather than                       bank investment policies (9) and investment
         at the investment level.                                                ratings (8). The less well-represented tools are
                                                                                 codes of conduct and investment indexes. Nine
         Concerning SRI infrastructure, accreditation                            country indicators have also been analyzed.
         bodies accredit both SRI rating agencies and                            These indicators are useful for comparing
         certification bodies. Certification bodies control                      the suitability of countries to host planted
         the application of standards at the level of                            forest investments.
         plantation companies and processing industries,
         while SRI rating agencies score the quality of                          5.2.2 Specificity and governance
         banks, funds and investment companies. SRI
         standard setters are the developers of rating systems                   Most instruments have a broad sectoral
         and standards to be controlled by SRI rating                            approach (29) or a forest sector focus (19)
         agencies and certification bodies. SRI advisors and                     and include both planted and natural forests.
         consultants, together with SRI directories, forums                      Management standards are mostly specific for
         and associations provide advocacy and consultancy                       forest and planted forests (Figure 3).
         services on SRIs.
                                                                                 Investment guidelines (e.g. WWF Responsible
                                                                                 Investment Guide) and legality benchmarks
         5.2 SRI tools for the planted forests                                   (e.g. Lacey Act) are mostly forest specific;
         sector                                                                  however, reporting and investment standards all
                                                                                 have a broad sectoral approach. Investors and
         5.2.1 Type of instruments                                               investment companies are the players using the
                                                                                 majority of broad-scope SRI tools. This is not
         A total of 50 SRI tools have been identified (Annex                     surprising since only 1–2% of an investment
         7 and Annex 8). The most frequent instruments                           portfolio is made up of forest assets.

                 Investment Index                                                                               Broad Sectoral

                  Code of Conduct                                                                               Forests (Including
                                                                                                                planted forests)
               Reporting Standard
                                                                                                                Planted Forests

             Investment Guideline

              Legality Benchmark

             Investment Standard
                Investment Rating                                                                                                    29

           Bank Investment Policy

           Management Standard

                                     0           2           4            6            8     10       12

                                                                 Number of SRI tools

         Figure 3. Specificity of SRI tools by type of instrument. The number of codes of conduct is underestimated
         and only represents a sample.
Planted forests in emerging economies   |   13

        Investment Index

         Code of Conduct                                                                              Government

      Reporting Standard
    Investment Guideline

      Legality Benchmark                                                                              16%

     Investment Standard

       Investment Rating
  Bank Investment Policy

  Management Standard

                            0           2          4            6            8    10       12

                                                       Number of SRI tools

Figure 4. Governance structure of SRI tools by type of instrument.

Only two standards are specific to planted forests:                    codes of conduct and investment guidelines, it
Gold Standard and the Clean Development                                is business organizations that predominantly
Mechanism4 standard. One interpretation is                             develop and manage investment indexes, bank
the absence of a market for tools specific to                          investment policies and investment rating
planted forests investments. For example, FSC                          agencies. Governments are active in developing
certification, one of the most widely used SRI                         and managing legality benchmarks and
tools for planted forests (even though it was                          investment standards. Only one instrument,
initially created for natural forests), eventually                     the Ecobanking Project, has a strong
removed criterion 10 for planted forests in 2015.                      academic background.
The decision was made by the FSC in order to
ensure the same quality of forest management                           The role of private, for-profit companies
across all types of forests.                                           in developing and managing SRI tools is
                                                                       particularly evident for three types of SRI
Concerning governance (Figure 4), 60% of                               tools: bank investment policies, rating of
the instruments are produced and managed                               investments and investment standards. While
by business-oriented organizations, followed                           bank investment policies are obviously drafted
by government (22%), NGOs (16%) and                                    by banks themselves as internal procedures
academic (only 1 instrument). Although NGOs                            to account for ESG impacts, investment
are actively developing management standards,                          standards and investment ratings are evaluation
                                                                       instruments aimed at comparing different
                                                                       investments. Importantly, the lack of NGOs
4 CDM standards are applied to multiple sectors, but                   and independent monitoring organizations in
also have a specific methodological part dedicated to
afforestation/reforestation projects; hence, these standards
                                                                       the development and evaluation process of SRI
are categorized as planted forests specific.                           tools can generate credibility risks.
14   |     Lucio Brotto, Davide Pettenella, Paolo Cerutti and Romain Pirard

         5.2.3 Investment process stage and level                             the four groups of users, from investors to
         of control                                                           processing industries. The majority of the
                                                                              instruments are either used at the beginning
         SRI tools can be classified also in relation to                      of the investment process (e.g. UN PRI and
         the groups of targeted users. In particular, four                    all the bank investment policies) or at the end
         categories of users have been identified in the                      of the investment process, either by plantation
         planted forests investment process: investors,                       managers or processing companies (e.g. almost
         investment companies, plantation companies and                       all the management standards).
         processing industries (Figure 5).
                                                                              Concerning coordination between instruments,
         Investors use the highest number of SRI tools                        almost 20% of the SRI tools are stand-alone,
         (31), followed by processing industries (24),                        with no specific reference to or linkage with
         plantation companies (22) and investment                             other SRI tools. About 50% have at least one
         companies (13). Most of the instruments used                         connection with other SRI tools, e.g. a bank
         by investors are bank investment policies,                           investment policy that mandates the bank to
         investment ratings and investment standards,                         use only FSC-certified paper or to invest only in
         while plantation managers concentrate their                          FSC-certified forests. The more coordinated SRI
         efforts on management standards. Processing                          tools are the ‘WBCSD Sustainable Procurement
         industries use the more diversified types of                         of Wood and Paper-based Products Guide
         instruments, while investment companies use a                        and Resource Kit’ and the ‘WWF Responsible
         restricted set.                                                      Investment Guide,’ which are connected
                                                                              respectively to seven and six other SRI tools.
         Only five instruments (i.e. the FTSE4Good
         Index Series, the Global Reporting Initiative,                       This study also distinguishes among SRI
         the Global Compact, the SA 8000 and the                              instruments based on the level of control for the
         IFC Performance Standards) are applied across                        verification of ESG impacts: from the lowest

                 Investment Index

                 Code of Conduct                                                                          Investment Companies

                                                                                                          Plantation Companies
              Reporting Standard
                                                                                                          Processing Industries
            Investment Guideline

              Legality Benchmark                                                                           31

             Investment Standard
                Investment Rating

           Bank Investment Policy

           Management Standard

                                     0                 5                10           15            20

                                                              Number of SRI tools

         Figure 5. Users of SRI tools by type of instruments.
You can also read