PUBLIC COMPETITION NOTICE NO. 11/2018- PROPPG-Visiting Professor (VP) Rectified on October, 24, 2018
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Ministry of Education
Federal University of Technology, Paraná
Pro-Rectory of Research and Graduate Studies
PR
UNIVERSIDADE TECNOLÓGICA FEDERAL DO PARANÁ
Resolution 040/2018 of the Research and Postgraduation Council (COPPG)
Establishes a notice of public competition for the
hiring of visiting professors in accordance with the
Visiting Professor program of the Federal
Technological University of Paraná (Universidade
Tecnológica Federal do Paraná)
PUBLIC COMPETITION NOTICE NO. 11/2018—
PROPPG—Visiting Professor (VP)
Rectified on October, 24, 2018
ITEM I – GOALS
Section 1. The purpose of this public competition notice is to select 07 (seven)
temporary staff in the following categories: Level 1 Senior Visiting Professor
(PVS1); Level 2 Senior Visiting Professor (PVS2; Level 1 Senior Visiting
Professor from a Foreign Institution (PVS-IE/PVS1); Level 2 Senior Visiting
Professor from a Foreign Institution (PVS-IE/PVS2). Candidates must have a
scientific production of international scope and recognized excellence, as
determined by UTFPR’s Regulations of the Visiting Professor Program
(Regulamento do Programa Professor Visitante, RPPV), approved by COPPG
Resolution 039/2016 and under the terms of Law No. 8745 of December 9, 1993,
and/or recognized performance in internationalization management. The
program’s goal is to develop activities aiming at the consolidation, excellence and
internationalization of the post-graduate programs of the Federal Technological
University of Paraná (Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, UTFPR), in
accordance with resolution 040/2018, from July 4, 2018, of the Research and
Post-Graduation Council (Conselho de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, COPPG).1.1. For the PVS2 category, the candidate’s minimum time since obtaining
the doctoral degree must be 16 years; the candidate must meet the
requirements for CNPq’s Level 1 scholarship in Research Productivity or
Technological Development (Bolsista Produtividade em Pesquisa Nível 1
or Bolsista Desenvolvimento Tecnológico Nível 1) in the proposal’s
research area, and/or have recognized work in internationalization
management.
1.2. For the PVS1 category, the candidate’s minimum time since obtaining
the doctoral degree must be 10 years, and the candidate must meet the
requirements for CNPq’s Level 2 scholarship in Research Productivity or
Technological Development (Bolsista Produtividade em Pesquisa Nível 2
or Bolsista Desenvolvimento Tecnológico Nível 2) in the proposal’s
research area, and/or have recognized work in internationalization
management.
1.3. For the PVS-IE/PVS2 category, the minimum time since obtaining the
doctoral degree must be 16 years; the candidate must meet the
requirements for CNPq’s Level 1 scholarship in Research Productivity or
Technological Development (Bolsista Produtividade em Pesquisa Nível 1
or Bolsista Desenvolvimento Tecnológico Nível 1) in the proposal’s
research area, and/or have recognized work in internationalization
management.
1.4. For the PVS-IE/PVS1 category, the minimum time since obtaining the
doctoral degree must be 10 years; the candidate must meet the
requirements for CNPq’s Level 2 scholarship in Research Productivity or
Technological Development (Bolsista Produtividade em Pesquisa Nível 2
or Bolsista Desenvolvimento Tecnológico Nível 2) in the proposal’s
research area, and/or have recognized work in internationalization
management.
ITEM II – ELIGIBILITY FOR VISITING PROFESSOR VACANCIESSection 2. Candidates for the hereby announced visiting professor vacancies
must be PhDs with a scientific production recognized for its excellence and
international scope, according to the categories described in Section 1.
Sole Subsection. The candidate may be a permanent professor of at most
three Post-graduate Programs (this one included).
Section 3. Ineligible for admittance as visiting professors, in accordance with
RPPV-UTFPR, are the following:
I – Retired UTFPR professors or public servants;
II – Active servants of the direct or indirect administration of the Union, the
States, the Federal District and the Municipalities;
III – Employees or servants of public companies or companies of mixed
economy of the three spheres of government, as well as their subsidiaries
or controlled companies (article 6 of Law 8745, from December 9, 1993).
ITEM III – HIRING PROPOSALS
Section 4. All UTFPR post-graduate programs are eligible to submit hiring
proposals to this public competition notice.
4.1. Proposals resulting from the association between two or more post-
graduate programs will not receive extra punctuation.
4.2. Proposals that demonstrate a formal bond of the professor or
researcher with a foreign institution will be prioritized for the PVS-IE/PVS2
and PVSIE/PVS1 vacancies, assuming the fulfillment of the criteria set
forth in Section 1 of Section I, and also the following:
(1) to have a higher or similar position as the best Brazilian
university in rankings such as: Times Higher Education, QS World
University Rankings, Academic Ranking of World Universities,
and/or(2) to maintain a current formal research and post-graduate
partnership with UTFPR, considered by the latter to be strategic,
listed in the DIRINTER web page of UTFPR’s internet portal.
4.3. Each proposal is limited to the nomination of one visiting professor.
4.4. Each proposal will be assigned a permanent professor of the UTFPR
post-graduate program, which will be responsible for assessing it.
4.5. Each permanent professor of UTFPR’s post-graduate program may
submit only one proposal.
4.6. The proposal and its assigned professor must be approved by the
collegiate of the respective UTFPR post-graduate program.
4.7. More than one proposal from a single post-graduate program may be
considered, provided there is a vacancy remaining after the Merit Analysis
stage.
4.8. Post-graduate programs that have visiting professors with currently
effective contracts will only be considered in case of a vacancy remaining
after the Merit Analysis stage.
Section 5. The following are the obligations of proponent post-graduate
programs:
I – To guarantee a workplace and infrastructure adequate to the activities
to be carried out by the visiting professor;
II – To provide the VP with access to the libraries, the CAPES portal of
journals and the laboratories and/or research groups of the project
concentration area in which the visiting professor will carry out activities;
III – To help the visiting professor ease into the routine of the post-graduate
program, enabling their participation in its activities, including teaching,
research and internationalization actions;
IV – To maintain the necessary conditions for the execution of the project.
Section 6. The complete proposal of the post-graduate program, with all the VP
hiring-related documentation, should be sent via the Electronic InformationSystem (Sistema Eletrônico de Informação, SEI) to the Pro-Rectory of Research
and Post-Graduation (Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, PROPPG)
until 5:00 pm of the final date presented in the public notice’s schedule.
Section 7. The proposal for hiring a visiting professor should be presented in the
form of an administrative process in the SEI, with the following process type:
“Pessoal: Processo Seletivo para Contratação de Docente Temporário,
Substituto ou Visitantes” (Personnel: Process for Selecting and Hiring
Temporary, Substitute or Visiting Professors), containing the following
documents:
I – Visiting professor application form signed by the coordinator of the post-
graduate program and by the permanent professor responsible for the
proposal and for the candidate; the candidate’s signature may be
presented in electronic form (Annex A);
II – Work plan, limited to 20 pages, containing time-sensitive goals and a
schedule compatible with the term of contract. This plan should contain a
detailed description of the candidate’s research activities, teaching and
academic orientation, management and internationalization actions, as
well as list the infrastructure necessary to meet all the requirements for the
execution of the proposal.
III – Statement by the permanent professor of the post-graduate program
responsible for the proposal, stating that the necessary infrastructure to
attend the visiting professor is available, indicating, where appropriate, the
name of the laboratory.
IV – Visiting professor’s updated curriculum vitae (CV), with the Lattes CV
format being mandatory for Brazilians, and containing the following
annexes:
(a) Copies of undergraduate and stricto sensu post-graduate
diplomas (mandatory).
(b) Table 1 (Annex B) identifying items to be used in the calculation
of the score (requests for points must follow the guidelinesprovided by Annex C), and an indication of the page of the single
file which contains proof for the respective request (mandatory),
(c) Copy of the first page(s) of the scientific article(s) to be used in
the calculation of the score (if present as a request for points in
Table 1),
(d) Cover page, first page and elements identifying the international
book(s) with ISBN registry to be used in the calculation of the
score (if present as a request for points in Table 1),
(e) Cover page, first page, and elements identifying the international
book chapter(s) with ISBN registry to be used in the calculation
of the score (if present as a request for points in Table 1),
(f) Copy of the elements that identify patent(s) requested by the
candidate that have as co-inventor a strictu sensu post-
graduation student, to be used in the calculation of the score (if
present as a request for points in Table 1),
(g) Copy of elements identifying granted patent(s), to be used in the
calculation of the score (if present as a request for points in
Table 1),
(h) Copy of elements that identify the candidate as project
coordinator financed by national or international companies or
agencies, to be used in the calculation of the score (if present
as a request for points in Table 1),
(i) When applicable, proof that the candidate has a teacher or
researcher position in a foreign institution that meets at least one
of the following conditions (if present as a request for points in
Table 1):
Researcher’s institution of origin is ranked among the top
thousand in the World University Rankings 2018, or the
Times Higher Education ranking, and/or;
Researcher’s institution of origin has a currently valid formal
research and post-graduate partnership with UTFPR,
considered strategic by the latter (strategic partnerships
listed in PROPPG’s website, in the UTFPR portal).V – Copy of the minutes of the meeting(s) of the collegiate(s) of the
proponent post-doctoral program(s), duly signed, including the name of the
permanent professor responsible for the proposal, the research line/area
of concentration benefited, and the approval of the candidate’s nomination
to VP.
VI – Memorandum of request submission by the Director(s) of Research
and Post-Graduation of the involved Campi.
7.1. In the calculation of the VP candidates’ scores, only the technical-
scientific production (items "c" to "i") of the last five full years plus the
current year (i.e., 2013 to 2018) will be considered; up to five scientific
articles outside this period will be considered, as long as they are indicated
by the candidate as the most relevant in their career.
7.2. Documents I to VI are mandatory.
ITEM IV – ANALYSIS, CLASSIFICATION OF PROPOSALS AND
SCHEDULE
Section 8. The first stage of this selection and hiring process will consist of
document analysis in accordance with the provisions of Section 7.
8.1. Document analysis will be carried out by PROPPG.
8.2. Proposals which are not presented in the form and order described in
Section 7 and/or containing incomplete documentation will be
automatically excluded from this competition.
Section 9. The second stage will consist of an analysis the proposal’s merit, as
well as the calculation of its classification.
9.1. Merit analysis will be carried out exclusively by the Central
Commission for Evaluation of the VP Procurement Process, appointed by
the Pro-Rector of Research and Post-Graduation.
9.2. The process of merit analysis is based on two components,
designated “Titularity Assessment” and “Work Plan” assessment, each
with a weight of 50% in the composition of the final grade.9.3. The score attributed during Titularity Assessment will be calculated
based on the analysis of the candidate’s CV according to the score
requests in Table 1 and the respective supporting documents (Section 7);
the highest score obtained among the candidates will be considered the
maximum (reference) grade.
9.4. Candidates holding a CNPq scholarship in research (PQ) or
technological development (DT), provided that with internationally
recognized scientific production, will automatically receive a maximum
score in relation to the requirements described in §3.
9.5 Candidates who do not hold a PQ or DT grant from CNPq at the level
required by the category indicated in the application will have their CV
analyzed by examiner(s) of the Central Commission for Evaluation of the
VP Procurement Process, or ad hoc consultant(s) designated by it,
considering the goals of this announcement.
9.6. Candidates who obtain a grade lower than 5 (corresponding to 50%
of the reference value specified in §3 of this section) will be considered
ineligible.
9.7. Only the candidates considered eligible after the Titularity Assessment
will have their Work Plan assessed.
9.8. The evaluation of the Work Plan will be carried out by the examiner(s)
of the Central Commission for Evaluation of the VP Procurement Process,
or by ad hoc consultants designated by it. Applicants will receive an
Approved (ten) or Not Approved (zero) grade, taking into account:
(a) Quality, regularity and adequacy of the candidate’s scientific
production in respect to the proposed work plan and research
project;
(b) Candidate’s experience in research lines related to the area they
applied for;
(c) Candidate experience in positions and management processes
related to internationalization;(d) Availability of the candidate to be part of the permanent faculty
of the program, developing research and teaching, as well as
research advisement and co-advisement activities;
(e) Feasibility of the work plan, considering the available
infrastructure of the proponent post-graduate program(s) and
the term of contract;
(f) Expected results of the work plan’s execution;
(g) Relevance of the proposed work plan, considering its impact on
the involved post-graduate program(s) (proposals for the
association of distinct programs are valued) and,
(h) Qualifications coherent with the proposed goals and activities.
Section 10. The Central Commission for Evaluation of the VP Procurement
Process should present a Final Report to the PROPPG, containing the relevant
information on each of the proposals and the list of approved candidates.
Sole Subsection. If necessary, the score attributed to the Titularity
Assessment component (Section 9, §3) will be employed as a tie-breaker,
regardless of whether the candidate holds a CNPq scholarship in either
research or technological development.
ITEM V – RESULTS AND APPEALS
Section 11. Based on the Final Report prepared by the Central Commission for
Evaluation of the VP Procurement Process, PROPPG will disclose the results in
accordance with the deadlines set forth in Section 12.
Section 12. Results can be appealed during both the first and second stages;
appeals have to be submitted within five working days of disclosure of the results
on the PROPPG website.
12.1. The appeal must be sent to the Directorate of Research and Post-
Graduate Studies (DIRPPG) of the respective campus, within the deadline
set forth in this announcement; it will be forwarded via SEI to the PROPPG,
and subsequently assessed by the committee responsible for the
respective stage, based on the original proposal.12.2. Inclusion of documents will not be allowed after the deadline for post-
graduation programs’ submission of the processes; appeals referring to
either of the stages of the competition also cannot include new documents.
12.3. Appeals pertaining the first stage (Document Analysis) will be
forwarded to the Ad hoc Comission of Appeals, as determined by
Resolution no. 038/16-COPPG, from September 19, 2016.
12.4. Appeals pertaining the second stage (Merit Analysis) will be sent to
the Commission for the Analysis of Appeals, according to the provisions of
the Regulations of the Visiting Professor Program of the UTFPR, Section
22, subsections 22.1 and 22.2.
Section 13. The final result of this public competition notice, after the judgment of
appeals, will be published in the Official Gazette of the Union upon request by
the president of the COPPG-UTFPR to the Rector.
Sole Subsection. After publication of the final result in the Official Gazette
of the Union, DIRGEP-UTFPR will send the list of selected applications to
the COGERH of the Campus where the Visiting Professor will be employed.
The contact between the Selected Candidate and the UTFPR will be made
through the COGERH of the Campus of VP employment.
Section 14. For the present public competition notice the following schedule is
established:
1 SUBMISSION OF PROCESSES by Post- Not after November 23, 2018
graduate Programs
2 Publication of the list of registered November 27, 2018
applications
DOCUMENT ANALYSIS November 28 to December
3, 2018
3 Publication of the list of approved December 4, 2018
applications
4 Period scheduled for approval-related December 5 to December
appeals 11, 2018
Publication of results of the analysis of Not after December 14, 2018
approval-related appeals
5 MERIT ANALYSIS—Classification of February 1 to February 16,
proposals 2019
6 Publication of RESULTS of the MERIT Not after February 19, 2019
ANALYSIS
7 Period scheduled for merit analysis- February 20 to February 26,
related appeals 2019Results of the assessment of merit Not after February 28, 2019
analysis-related appeals and publication
of the competition’s FINAL RESULT
ITEM VI – HIRING DEADLINES AND REGIME OF EMPLOYMENT
Section 15. The contracts referred to in this public competition notice will be
carried out for a fixed period of time, under an exclusively dedicated work regime,
linked to the General Social Security System, and the benefits provided in article
11 of Law 8745/93.
15.1. The hiring for the positions that are the object of this public notice
shall be subject to budgetary availability, determined by the MEC (Ministry
of Education).
15.2. In the case of additional vacancies’ availability for visiting professors
in the UTFPR equivalent teachers’ bank, candidates classified in the
contest, but theretofore not hired, may be called by order of classification.
Section 16. For the hiring of Senior Visiting Professors, the reference salary of
already hired Higher Magisterium professors will be used as a basis (PVS2, PVS-
IE/PVS2 and PVS-IE/PVS1 are equivalent to Class E, Level 1; PVS1 is equivalent
to Class D, Level 1).
Sole Subsection. In case the candidate’s experience and qualifications are
compatible with those demanded by any program of a national
development agency which pays a higher salary, the reference salary
value of said agency can be adopted.
Section 17. The hired party cannot be replaced by another.
Section 18. Only proposals presenting hiring dates before June 29, 2019 will be
considered.
Section 19. Visiting Brazilian professors will be hired for at least 03 (three) months
and at most 12 (twelve) months.
Sole Subsection. The contract may be renewed at the request of the
coordinator of the post-graduate program, provided that the total perioddoes not exceed twenty-four (24) months and that the renewal is
anticipated in the work plan of the proposal.
Section 20. The hiring of foreign visiting professors will be carried out for at least
03 (three) months and at most 24 (twenty-four) months.
Sole Subsection. The contract may be renewed at the request of the
coordinator of the post-graduate program, provided that the total period
does not exceed twenty-four (48) months and that the renewal is
anticipated in the work plan of the proposal.
ITEM VII – GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 21. Scientific articles and other products or documents associated with
research developed during the term of the contract must, necessarily and at all
times, expose the association of the visiting professor/researcher’s to UTFPR; in
addition, these products have to be attached to the mandatory report to be
presented by the hired visiting professor to the post-graduate program to which
the professor is associated.
Section 22. Filling of the vacancies for Visiting Professor referred to in Section 1
is not mandatory.
Section 23. The Federal Justice Forum of Curitiba, Paraná Judiciary Section, is
elected to resolve any doubts or questions arising from this public notice.
Section 24. The candidate, when signing up, declares to be aware and to agree
with the terms of this notice.
Section 25. This public notice is valid for one year, counted from the date of
publication of the final result of the contest, and may be extended for another
year, at the request of PROPPG.
Section 26. This announcement comes into effect on the date of its publication in
the Official Gazette of the Union and in the PROPPG portal.Curitiba, October, 24, 2018
Prof. Valdir Fernandes
Provost of Research and Graduate StudiesAnnex A – PRESENTATION
FORM FOR
VISITING PROFESSOR CANDIDATESMinistry of Education
Universidade Federal Tecnológica do Paraná
Pro-Rectory of Research and Post-graduate Studies
PR
UNIVERSIDADE TECNOLÓGICA FEDERAL DO PARANÁ
PRESENTATION FORM FOR VISITING PROFESSOR
CANDIDATES
1. POST-GRADUATE PROGRAM(S):
__________________________________________________________
2. NAME OF THE PERMANENT PROFESSOR RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROPOSAL:
___________________________________________________________
3. NAME OF THE VISITING PROFESSOR CANDIDATE:
___________________________________________________________
4. VISITING PROFESSOR CATEGORY:
( ) L2SVP ( ) L1SVP ( ) FI-SVP/L2SVP ( ) FI-SVP/L1SVP
5. HOLDER OF A CNPq SCHOLARSHIP IN RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OR PRODUCTIVITY IN
TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATIVE EXTENSION:
( ) YES ( ) NO – IN CASE OF AN AFFIRMATIVE ANSWER, INDICATE THE SCHOLARSHIP’S
LEVEL:
______________
6. CNPq ADVISORY COMMITTEE IN WHICH THE PROPOSAL IS INSERTED:
___________________________________________________________
Coordinator of the Post-graduate Program Name of the permanent professor responsible for
the proposal
Name of the Visiting Professor candidateAnnex B – For requesting points
Table 1 – Model for requesting points
Item No. of points requested Page of the single file
containing proofAnnex C – Points per item, considering production of the last 5
years plus the current year, as well as relevant articles chosen
by the candidate.
ITEM Points per Limit
proven item
SNIP > 1.0 (or JCR > 2.0, in case SNIP is not available) 15 N.A.
0.5 < SNIP < 0.99 (or 1.0 < JCR < 1.99, in case SNIP is not available) 12 N.A.
0.1 < SNIP < 0.49 (or 0.5 < JCR < 0.99, in case SNIP is not available) 6 18 points
Book of international scope with ISBN registry 30 N.A.
Book chapter in book with international scope with ISBN registry 15 45 points
Patent requested in the area 6 30 points
Patent granted in the area 30 N.A.
Project coordinator financed by company or national agencies 10 30 points
Project coordinator financed by international companies or agencies 15 N.A.
Main PhD adviser (per PhD-graduated student) 5 30 points
Main master's adviser (per master’s course-graduated student) 1 10 points
Stricto sensu post-graduation professor with international excellence in a foreign 10/year N.A.
institution ranked among the top 1000 in the World University Rankings (2018), by
Times Higher Education
10/year N.A.
Candidates from a foreign institution, with at least 10 years recognized experience and
practice in internationalizationYou can also read
