The Effects of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Anxiety Ratings of Hospitalized Psychiatric Patients

Page created by Crystal Oliver
 
CONTINUE READING
The Effects of Animal-Assisted
Therapy on Anxiety Ratings of
Hospitalized Psychiatric Patients
Sandra B. Barker, Ph.D.
Kathryn S. Dawson, Ph.D.

Objective: Animal-assisted therapy involves interaction between pa-                             Stress and anxiety are considered
tients and a trained animal, along with its human owner or handler,                          contributory factors to cardiovascular
with the aim of facilitating patients’ progress toward therapeutic goals.                    disease. Investigators have hypothe-
This study examined whether a session of animal-assisted therapy re-                         sized that companion animals may
duced the anxiety levels of hospitalized psychiatric patients and                            serve to lower levels of stress and anx-
whether any differences in reductions in anxiety were associated with                        iety (4,7,8). Several authors have re-
patients’ diagnoses. Methods: Study subjects were 230 patients referred                      ported lower blood pressure readings
for therapeutic recreation sessions. A pre- and posttreatment crossover                      among adults and children when a
study design was used to compare the effects of a single animal-assist-                      previously unknown companion ani-
ed therapy session with those of a single regularly scheduled thera-                         mal is present during various stressful
peutic recreation session. Before and after participating in the two                         activities (5,9–14).
types of sessions, subjects completed the state scale of the State-Trait                        Animals have been associated with
Anxiety Inventory, a self-report measure of anxiety currently felt. A                        positive effects on patients in a variety
mixed-models repeated-measures analysis was used to test differences                         of health care settings (15). When an-
in scores from before and after the two types of sessions. Results: Sta-                     imals were first introduced to these
tistically significant reductions in anxiety scores were found after the                     settings, they were generally brought
animal-assisted therapy session for patients with psychotic disorders,                       for visits that were incidental to the
mood disorders, and other disorders, and after the therapeutic recre-                        treatment program. Currently, ani-
ation session for patients with mood disorders. No statistically signifi-                    mals are purposely included in treat-
cant differences in reduction of anxiety were found between the two                          ment through various interventions
types of sessions. Conclusions: Animal-assisted therapy was associated                       broadly known as animal-assisted
with reduced state anxiety levels for hospitalized patients with a vari-                     therapy.
ety of psychiatric diagnoses, while a routine therapeutic recreation ses-                       Animal-assisted therapy involves
sion was associated with reduced levels only for patients with mood dis-                     the use of trained animals in facilitat-
orders. (Psychiatric Services 49:797–801, 1998)                                              ing patients’ progress toward thera-
                                                                                             peutic goals (16). Interventions vary
                                                                                             widely, from long-term arrangements

W
           ithin the last decade, stud-        cardiovascular benefit was document-          in which patients adopt pets to short-
           ies supporting the health           ed in an Australian study involving           term interactions between patients
           benefits of companion ani-          5,741 participants (6). The authors           and a trained animal in structured ac-
mals have emerged (1–4). Cardiovas-            found that pet owners had significant-        tivities.
cular effects are often the focus, due         ly lower blood pressure and triglyc-             Although animals have typically
partly to findings from a 1980 study           eride levels compared with non-pet-           been well received on psychiatric ser-
that reported longer survival rates fol-       owners, and the differences could not         vices, much of the data attesting to
lowing myocardial infarction for pet           be explained by differences in ciga-          their benefits has been anecdotal
owners compared with people with               rette smoking, diet, body mass index,         (17–19). Several decades ago, Searles
no pets (5). More recent evidence of           or socioeconomic profile.                     (20) and Levinson (21) addressed the
                                                                                             therapeutic benefit of a companion
                                                                                             dog for patients with schizophrenia,
Dr. Barker is associate professor of psychiatry, internal medicine, and anesthesiology       contending that the caring, human-
and Dr. Dawson is affiliate assistant professor of biostatistics at the Medical College of   canine relationship helped ground
Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980710, Richmond, Virginia              the patient in reality. Chronic mental-
23298. Dr. Barker’s e-mail address is sbbarker@hsc.vcu.edu.                                  ly ill residents in supportive care
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES   ♦ June 1998 Vol. 49 No. 6                                                                                  797
homes who were visited by puppies           pared for the same patients under            sessions was shared by three recre-
had decreased depression after the          two conditions: a single animal-assist-      ational therapists.
visits, compared with a matched con-        ed therapy group session and a single           The study used the state scale of
trol group (22).                            therapeutic recreation group session         the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory to
   More recently, Arnold (23) de-           that served as a comparison condi-           measure patients’ levels of anxiety be-
scribed the use of therapy dogs with        tion. The setting for this study was the     fore and after the animal-assisted
patients with dissociative disorders.       inpatient psychiatry service of an ur-       therapy session and the therapeutic
Benefits included the dog’s calming in-     ban academic medical center. The             recreation session (30). The State-
fluence, ability to alert the therapist     service treats adult patients with a full    Trait Anxiety Inventory is a brief,
early to clients’ distress, and facilita-   range of acute psychiatric disorders.        easy-to-administer self-report mea-
tion of communication and interac-          The average length of stay is seven to       sure that is widely used in research
tion. Others have proposed that an an-      eight days.                                  and clinical practice.
imal can serve as a clinical bridge in         The animal-assisted therapy session          The state scale, which measures
psychotherapy, providing an entree to       consisted of approximately 30 min-           the level of anxiety felt at the present
more sensitive issues (16,24,25).           utes of group interaction with a ther-       time, has been found to be sensitive
   On an inpatient psychiatric unit,        apy dog and the dog’s owner. During          to changes in transitory anxiety expe-
animal-assisted therapy was found to        the semistructured session, which            rienced by patients in mental health
attract the greatest number of pa-          was held once a week, the owner              treatment. The inventory consists of
tients among those who selected             talked generally about the dog and           20 items related to feelings of appre-
groups to attend voluntarily and was                                                     hension, nervousness, tension, and
found to be the most effective in at-                                                    worry. For each item, subjects circle
tracting isolated patients (26). Other                                                   one of four numbers corresponding
researchers found that a group meet-                                                     to ratings of not at all, somewhat,
ing for psychiatric inpatients held in                       The                         moderately so, or very much so. In-
a room where caged finches were lo-                                                      struments are scored by calculating
cated had higher attendance and                      animal-assisted                     the total of the weighted item re-
higher levels of patient participation,                                                  sponses. Scores can range from 20 to
and was associated with more im-              therapy session consisted                  80, with greater scores reflecting
provement in scores on the Brief                                                         higher levels of anxiety.
Psychiatric Rating Scale, compared             of about 30 minutes of                       The internal consistency for the
with a matched group held in a room                                                      state scale of the State-Trait Anxiety
without birds (27). Anecdotally, psy-          group interaction with                    Inventory is high; median alpha coef-
chiatric patients who are withdrawn                                                      ficient is .93 (30). The construct valid-
and nonresponsive have been de-                   a therapy dog and                      ity is supported by studies showing
scribed as responding positively to a                                                    that state scale scores are higher un-
therapy dog with smiles, hugs, and                        the dog’s                      der stressful conditions.
talking (16). For elderly patients
with dementia, lower heart rates and                       owner.                        Procedures
noise levels were associated with the                                                    A total of 313 adult psychiatric pa-
presence of a therapy dog (28), and                                                      tients consecutively referred for ther-
patients with Alzheimer’s disease sig-                                                   apeutic recreation over an eight-
nificantly increased socialization be-                                                   month period in 1996 were eligible
haviors when a therapy dog was              encouraged discussion about pa-              for the study. Patients are referred for
nearby (29).                                tients’ pets as the dog moved freely         therapeutic recreation as soon as they
   Based on the evidence in the litera-     about the room interacting with pa-          are stable enough to participate in
ture associating companion animals          tients or carrying out basic obedience       group activities, generally within 24
with anxiety reduction and with posi-       commands.                                    to 72 hours of admission.
tive responses from clinical popula-           The comparison condition was a               When patients were initially re-
tions, this study investigated the ef-      therapeutic recreation group session         ferred for therapeutic recreation,
fect of an animal-assisted therapy          held on the unit on the day following        they were asked to sign a consent
group session on the anxiety levels of      the animal-assisted therapy session.         form to participate in a group session
psychiatric inpatients. Also of re-         Therapeutic recreation sessions were         involving a therapy dog. Patients were
search interest was whether any anxi-       held daily on the unit. They varied in       not eligible to participate if they had
olytic effect found varied by diagnos-      content, including education about           any known canine allergies, were
tic group.                                  how to spend leisure time, presenta-         fearful of dogs, or did not sign a con-
                                            tions to increase awareness of leisure       sent form. Study subjects attended
Methods                                     resources in the community, and mu-          both an animal-assisted therapy
A pre- and posttreatment crossover          sic and art activities. Coordination of      group session and a therapeutic
design was used for this study.             both the animal-assisted therapy ses-        recreation group session. The two
Changes in anxiety ratings were com-        sions and the therapeutic recreation         types of sessions were held once a
798                                                                                PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES   ♦ June 1998 Vol. 49 No. 6
Table 1
Mean pretreatment, posttreatment, and change scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for hospitalized psychiatric pa-
tients with various diagnoses who participated in an animal-assisted therapy session or therapeutic recreation
                                 Animal-assisted therapy (N=93)                  Therapeutic recreation (N=137)

Diagnosis and measure            N        Mean       SD           F1     p<      N         Mean      SD           F1        p<

Mood disorders
  Pretreatment                   53        47.58     12.73                       83        47.58     12.73
  Posttreatment                  45        42.35     12.74                       80        43.68     10.78
  Change                         44         4.05      9.08        6.71   .01     80         4.08      9.08        16.8     .001
Psychotic disorders
  Pretreatment                   34        48.47     15.26                       45        46.31     12.55
  Posttreatment                  26        42.65     12.53                       39        43.41     14.56
  Change                         26         5.77     13.72        7.62   .006    39         2.08      9.06         1.90    ns
Substance use disorders
  Pretreatment                   16        48.93     13.17                       15        45.33     11.30
  Posttreatment                  13        44.07     14.00                       14        43.28      8.19
  Change                         12         5.17     10.00        2.66   ns      13          .69      7.79          .09    ns
Other disorders
  Pretreatment                   11        52.81     11.68                        5        50.40     19.56
  Posttreatment                  11        45.54     13.74                        5        50.20     18.74
  Change                         11         7.27      9.67        5.06   .026     5          .20      6.87          .003   ns
1   df=1, 194

week on consecutive days at the same             The dogs and owners met hospital       measure for the session. Fifty patients
time on each day.                             policy for participating in animal-as-    completed a pre- and a posttreatment
   The three recreational therapists          sisted therapy, including documenta-      measure for both types of sessions.
providing services to the inpatient           tion of the dog’s current vaccinations,   Failure to complete all four measures
psychiatry unit volunteered to assist         controllability, and temperament.         was primarily due to time conflicts
with the study. Because the thera-            The volunteers were advised of the        with medical treatments and patient
pists were not blind to the treatment         animal-assisted therapy group session     discharges.
condition, steps were taken to mini-          and given direction on how to lead
mize bias by training the therapists          the therapy group.                        Patient characteristics
in standard data collection proce-                                                      The mean±SD age of the 313 pa-
dures. At the beginning and end of            Analysis                                  tients referred for therapeutic recre-
each animal-assisted therapy group            Instruments were scored twice for ac-     ation was 37±12 years, and their
session and the comparison thera-             curacy by one of the authors using the    mean length of stay was 10.98±8.88
peutic recreation group session the           scoring keys for the State-Trait Anxi-    days. A total of 174 patients were
following day, the recreational thera-        ety Inventory. A mixed-models re-         women, and 139 were men. The ma-
pist administered the State-Trait             peated-measures analysis was used to      jority were black (169 subjects, or 54
Anxiety Inventory. The therapists             compare pre- and posttreatment dif-       percent) and single (195 subjects, or
read the instrument verbatim to any           ferences in anxiety scores between        63 percent). They had completed an
patient who had difficulties reading.         and within the animal-assisted thera-     average of 11.3±2.6 years of educa-
For the animal-assisted therapy               py condition and the therapeutic          tion.
group, the pretreatment instrument            recreation condition by diagnostic           For analysis, patients were catego-
was completed before the dog en-              category.                                 rized by primary discharge diagnosis.
tered the room.                                                                         The diagnoses were collapsed into
   Two female owners of therapy dogs          Results                                   four categories: mood disorders, in-
volunteered to provide the animal-as-         Because this study was conducted in a     cluding all depressive, bipolar, and
sisted therapy sessions. The first vol-       clinical setting, pre- and posttreat-     other mood disorders, for 154 pa-
unteer provided the therapy for the           ment measures on all subjects under       tients (49.2 percent); psychotic disor-
initial four months of the study; then        both conditions were difficult to ob-     ders, including schizophrenia, schizo-
she became ill and could not contin-          tain. Six patients refused to partici-    affective disorder, and other psychot-
ue. The second volunteer agreed to            pate because of canine allergies or       ic disorders, for 80 patients (25.6 per-
continue the study following the same         fear of dogs. Of the 313 patients who     cent); substance use disorders, for 52
format used by the first volunteer.           were eligible for the study, 73 percent   patients (16.6 percent); and all other
Her participation required reversing          (N=230) participated in at least one      disorders, including anxiety, cogni-
the days that the animal-assisted ther-       animal-assisted therapy group session     tive, personality, and somatization
apy session and the therapeutic recre-        or one recreation group session and       disorders, for 27 patients (8.6 per-
ation session were offered.                   completed a pre- and a posttreatment      cent).
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES   ♦ June 1998 Vol. 49 No. 6                                                                            799
Comparison of therapy groups               peutic recreation. However, this lack      animal-assisted therapy or therapeu-
Table 1 shows the mean scores of the       of difference could be due to the          tic recreation. This lack of difference
230 study participants on the State-       small number of patients (N=50) who        may be due to the small sample size
Trait Anxiety Inventory before and af-     completed all four study measures. A       or due to a relationship between state
ter attending an animal-assisted ther-     power analysis of the magnitude of         anxiety and physiological withdrawal
apy group session and a therapeutic        differences between the change             that is less amenable to change within
recreation group session as well as the    scores for animal-assisted therapy and     one session of animal-assisted therapy
mean change scores. Change scores          therapeutic recreation indicated that      or therapeutic recreation.
were calculated using data from pa-        larger samples would be needed to             The reduction in anxiety scores for
tients with measures at both pre- and      achieve an 80 percent power level at       patients with psychotic disorders was
posttreatment time points. The F test      an alpha of .05: a sample of 300 pa-       twice as great after animal-assisted
and p values show the significance of      tients with psychotic disorders, 125       therapy as after therapeutic recre-
the change across time. No statistical-    patients with substance use disorders,     ation. This finding suggests that ani-
ly significant differences in anxiety      and 61 patients with other disorders.      mal-assisted therapy may offer pa-
change scores were found between           For patients with mood disorders, the      tients with psychotic disorders an in-
animal-assisted therapy and thera-         difference in anxiety change scores        teraction that involves fewer de-
peutic recreation. Although no signif-     was too small for any reasonably sized     mands compared with traditional
icant between-group differences                                                       therapies. As Arnold (23) contends,
were found, within-group differences                                                  perhaps the therapy dog provides
were statistically significant for both                                               some sense of safety and comfort not
animal-assisted therapy and thera-                                                    found in more traditional inpatient
peutic recreation (F=6.71, df= 1, 194,                     The                        therapies. Alternatively, the dog may
p=.01, and F=16.81, df=1, 194,                                                        provide a nonthreatening diversion
p
study, a second therapy dog and own-               10. Friedman E, Katcher AH, Thomas SA, et          21. Levinson BM: The dog as co-therapist.
                                                       al: Social interaction and blood pressure:         Mental Hygiene 46:59–65, 1962
er, a potential confounding variable,                  influence of companion animals. Journal of
were introduced after the first owner                  Nervous and Mental Disease 171:461–465,        22. Francis G, Turner J, Johnson S: Domestic
                                                       1983                                               animal visitation as therapy with adult
became ill. Use of nonvolunteers                                                                          home residents. International Journal of
could strengthen future studies by                 11. Katcher AH, Friedman E, Beck AM, et al:            Nursing Studies 22:201–206, 1985
providing more consistent treatment                    Looking, talking, and blood pressure: the
                                                       physiological consequences of interaction      23. Arnold JC: Therapy dogs and the dissocia-
conditions.                                            with the living environment, in Our Lives          tive patient: preliminary observations. Dis-
   Finally, although the results pro-                  With Companion Animals. Edited by                  sociation 8:247–252, 1995
vide evidence of the immediate effect                  Katcher AH, Beck AM. Philadelphia, Uni-        24. Barker SB, Barker RT, Dawson KS, et al:
                                                       versity of Pennsylvania Press, 1983                The use of the family life space diagram in
on state anxiety of a single session of
                                                   12. Vormbrock JK, Grossberg JM: Cardiovas-             establishing interconnectedness: a prelimi-
animal-assisted therapy, further study                                                                    nary study of sexual abuse survivors, their
                                                       cular effects of human–pet dog interac-
is needed to determine if patients’                    tions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 11:          significant others, and pets. Individual Psy-
overall level of anxiety is affected.                  509–517, 1988                                      chology, in press
Further studies of the effect of ani-              13. Wilson CC: The pet as an anxiolytic inter-     25. Mallon GP: Utilization of animals as thera-
mal-assisted therapy on psychiatry                     vention. Journal of Nervous and Mental             peutic adjuncts with children and youth: a
                                                       Disease 179:482–489, 1991                          review of the literature. Child and Youth
services are needed to replicate the                                                                      Care Forum 21:53–67, 1992
findings from this study and to ad-                14. Nagengast SL, Baun MM, Leibowitz MJ, et
                                                       al: The effects of the presence of a com-      26. Holcomb R, Meacham M: Effectiveness of
vance our understanding of the ther-                   panion animal on physiological and behav-          an animal-assisted therapy program in an
apeutic benefits of the human-animal                   ioral distress in children during a physical       inpatient psychiatric unit. Anthrozoös
interaction. ♦                                         examination. Abstracts of the Delta Society        2:259–264, 1989
                                                       Twelfth Annual Conference. Renton,
                                                       Wash, Delta Society, 1993                      27. Beck A, Seraydarian L, Hunter G: The use
Acknowledgments                                                                                           of animals in the rehabilitation of psychi-
                                                   15. Barba BE: The positive influence of ani-           atric inpatients. Psychological Reports 58:
The authors thank Al Best, Ph.D., for his              mals: animal-assisted therapy in acute care.       63–66, 1986
assistance with statistical analysis and Pat           Clinical Nurse Specialist 9:199–202, 1995
Conley, Helen Brown, and Claudette Mc-                                                                28. Walsh PG, Mertin PG, Verlander DF, et al:
Daniel for their assistance with data col-         16. Voelker R: Puppy love can be therapeutic,          The effects of a “pets as therapy” dog on
lection.                                               too. JAMA 274:1897–1899, 1995                      persons with dementia in a psychiatric
                                                   17. Beck A: The therapeutic uses of animals.           ward. Australian Occupational Therapy
References                                             Veterinary Clinics of North America, Small         Journal 42:161–166, 1995
                                                       Animal Practice 15:2, 1985                     29. Batson K, McCabe BW, Baun MM, et al:
1. Akiyama A, Holtzman JM, Britz VVE: Pet
   ownership and health status during be-          18. Beck A, Katcher A: A new look at animal-           The effect of a therapy dog on socialization
   reavement. Omega 17:187–193, 1986                   assisted therapy. Journal of the American          and physiologic indicators of stress in per-
                                                       Veterinary Medical Association 184:414–            sons diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, in
2. Rowan AN: Do companion animals provide              421, 1984                                          Animals, Health, and Quality of Life: Ab-
   a health benefit? (edtl). Anthrozoös 4:212,                                                            stract Book. Paris, France, AFIRAC, 1995
   1991                                            19. Draper RJ, Gerber GJ, Layng EM: Defin-
                                                       ing the role of pet animals in psychothera-    30. Spielberger CD: State-Trait Anxiety Inven-
3. Serpell J: Beneficial effects of pet owner-         py. Psychiatric Journal of the University of       tory Manual. Palo Alto, Calif, Mind Gar-
   ship on some aspects of human health and            Ottawa 15:169–172, 1990                            den, 1977
   behavior. Journal of the Royal Society of       20. Searles H: The Non-Human Environment.          31. Arkow P: How to Start a Pet Therapy Pro-
   Medicine 84:717–720, 1991                           New York, International Universities Press,        gram. Alameda, Calif, Latham Foundation,
4. Siegel JM: Stressful life events and use of         1960                                               1982
   physician services among the elderly: the
   moderating role of pet ownership. Journal
   of Personality and Social Psychology 58:
   1081–1086, 1990

5. Friedman E, Katcher AH, Lynch JJ, et al:
   Animal companions and one-year survival
   of patients after discharge from a coronary                   First-Person Accounts Invited for Column
   care unit. Public Health Reports 95:307–
   312, 1980
                                                                 Patients, former patients, family members, and mental
6. Anderson WP, Reid CM, Jennings GL: Pet                        health professionals are invited to submit first-person
   ownership and risk factors for cardiovascu-
   lar disease. Medical Journal of Australia                     accounts of experiences with mental illness and treat-
   157: 298–301, 1992                                            ment for the Personal Accounts column of Psychiatric
7. Davis JH: Animal-facilitated therapy in
                                                                 Services. Maximum length is 1,600 words. The column
   stress mediation. Holistic Nursing Practice                   appears every other month.
   2:75–83, 1988
                                                                   Material to be considered for publication should be
8. Patronek GJ, Glickman LT: Pet ownership                       sent to the column editor, Jeffrey L. Geller, M.D.,
   protects against the risks and consequences
   of coronary heart disease. Medical Hy-                        M.P.H., at the Department of Psychiatry, University of
   potheses 40:245–249, 1993                                     Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North,
9. Baun M, Bergstrom N, Langston N, et al:                       Worcester, Massachusetts 01655. Authors may publish
   Physiological effects of petting dogs: influ-                 under a pseudonym if they wish.
   ence of attachment, in The Pet Connection.
   Edited by Anderson RK. Minneapolis, Uni-
   versity of Minnesota Press, 1984

PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES    ♦ June 1998 Vol. 49 No. 6                                                                                                 801
802   PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES   ♦ June 1998 Vol. 49 No. 6
You can also read