The stem-cell niche as an entity of action
The stem-cell niche as an entity of action
In architecture, the word niche refers to a recess, and in ecology it refers to a habitat where an organism can reside and reproduce; in French, it refers to a dog-house. So, the grand position of the stem cell in popular concepts of science is appropriately humbled by the cells dwelling in a place where they might awaken with fleas. However, the niche does provide both conceptual and physical depth to the stem cell. Stem cells are, after all, defined by their function in complex multidimensional environments over time. Stem cells are by themselves of limited inter- est, but the integration of stem cells and their descendents into tissues is the basis for higher forms of life.
Therefore, the niche is as critical as stem-cell-autonomous functions in shaping our understanding of basic stem-cell biology, and how it contributes to health and disease. Although a place of residence would fulfil the architectural concep- tion of the niche, it is inadequate in regard to stem cells. The niche in cell biology is more appropriately considered along ecologic lines, and requires a sustaining function. The simple location of stem cells is not sufficient to define a niche. The niche must have both anatomic and functional dimensions, specifically enabling stem cells to reproduce or self-renew.
This becomes particularly important as new sites of stem-cell localization are defined.
Adult or somatic stem cells generally have limited function without the niche. A case in point is the haematopoietic stem (HS) cell, which regenerates the entire blood and immune system, and makes copies of itself after limit-dilution transplantation. HS cells circulate freely, but seem to have little function outside specific anatomic locations. It is specific cues from specific sites that allow stem cells to persist, and to change in number and fate. Importantly, it is also the niche that pro- vides the modulation in stem-cell function needed under conditions of physiologic challenge. It is this dynamic capability that makes the ‘niche’ concept particularly important and central to the realization of regenerative medicine.
It is the ability of the niche to impose func- tions on stem cells that makes the concept important in disease. We are now at a time when descriptive studies are giving way to those of physiology. This review attempts to integrate the issues of niche components, signals and modification, and determinism imposed by the niche to portray the dynamism inherent in niche biology. Nicheelementsreconsidered:theroleofextracellularmatrix The concept of a niche as a specialized microenvironment housing stem cells was first proposed by Schofield almost 30 years ago in reference to mammalian haematology1 , although experimental evidence was first pro- vided by invertebrate models.
In the gonads of Drosophila melanogaster The stem-cell niche as an entity of action David T. Scadden1 Stem-cell populations are established in ‘niches’ — specific anatomic locations that regulate how they participate in tissue generation, maintenance and repair.The niche saves stem cells from depletion, while protecting the host from over-exuberant stem-cell proliferation. It constitutes a basic unit of tissue physiology, integrating signals that mediate the balanced response of stem cells to the needs of organisms. Yet the niche may also induce pathologies by imposing aberrant function on stem cells or other targets.
The interplay between stem cells and their niche creates the dynamic system necessary for sustaining tissues, and for the ultimate design of stem-cell therapeutics.
1 Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Regenerative Medicine, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, 185 Cambridge Street, CPZN – 4265A, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. and Caenorhabditis elegans, the germ stem cells reside at the distal end of a tapered structure, and have been shown to depend upon interac- tions with somatic cells at the end of that structure to maintain stem-cell features2–4 . The notion that heterologous cell types compose the niche was well supported by this early work and has led to emphasis on defin- ing similar cell-based niche components in mammalian tissues. This has yielded identification of the osteoblast in the bone marrow, and the endothelium in the brain, and possibly in the bone marrow5–8 .
Whether there is a necessity for another cell type — other than the stem cell — to be present for a niche to function, however, has recently been brought into question.
Two reports have demonstrated that the posterior mid-gut popula- tions of cells in Drosophila have the capacity to produce daughter cells of at least two types: enterocytes and enteroendocrine cells9,10 . These cells seem to be able to self-renew and provide a long-lived ability to gener- ate more mature offspring in a clonal manner. Notably, however, these cells do not appear to be in direct contact with a heterologous cell type. They do have focal localization of the β-catenin paralogue, Armadillo, at the interface between the stem cell and its descendant daughter cell (the enteroblast), but this is distinct from the cells of different lineages composingmostpreviously definedniches.Thestemcellsinthiscase sit on a basement membrane that divides them from surrounding muscle cells.
It is suggested that the basement membrane itself might participate inthespecializedmicroenvironment,possiblyprovidinganopportunity for shifting location of the stem cell, sliding along a continuum of the intestine. These data challenge the expectation that heterologous cells must necessarily be within the niche, and suggest that some stem cells might have a niche composed of extracellular matrix and other non-cel- lular constituents that could regulate their control (Fig. 1). The concept of extracellular matrix regulating primitive cells is long- standing and at least three examples now exist in mammalian stem-cell systems.
The first is in the skin, where β-1 integrins are known to be dif- ferentially expressed on primitive cells and to participate in constrained localization of a stem-cell population through presumed interaction with matrix glycoprotein ligands11,12 . Second, in the nervous system, absence of tenascin C alters neural stem-cell number and function in the subventricular zone13 . Tenascin C seems to modulate stem-cell sensitivity to fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and bone morphoge- netic protein 4 (BMP4), resulting in increased stem-cell propensity to generate glial offspring. In the haematopoietic system, tenascin C deletion has also been shown to affect primitive cell populations, raising the possibility that it participates in several stem-cell niches14 .
1075 INSIGHT REVIEW NATURE|Vol 441|29 June 2006|doi:10.1038/nature04957 NaturePublishing Group ©2006
Third, another matrix protein, the Arg–Gly–Asp (RGD)-contain- ing sialoprotein, osteopontin (OPN), has now been demonstrated to contribute to HS-cell regulation15,16 . Implicated previously in tumour metastasis and cell-mediated immunity17,18 , OPN interacts with several receptors known to be on HS cells, CD44, and α4 and α5β1 integrins19,20 . It is produced by multiple cell types, among them osteoblasts that contribute to the HS-cell niche. Notably, OPN production can vary markedly, particularly with osteoblast activation.
Animals deficient in OPN have an increased HS-cell number, owing to a mechanism that is still debated but is microenvironment dependent15,16 . Without OPN, superphysiologic stem-cell expansion occurred under stimula- tory conditions15 . Therefore, OPN seems to serve as a constraint on HS-cell number, limiting the number of stem cells under homeostatic conditions or with stimulation. Taking these three scenarios together, matrix components provide localizing niche elements that can contrib- ute stimulatory, or impose inhibitory, influences on the stem-cell pool. They, like other stimuli in the niche, balance opposing possibilities.
Paracrine factors and niche structure Cells and extracellular-matrix components in the stem-cell niche are relatively predictable, although the complexity and integration of these elements is far from understood. Soluble mediators of cellular response would also be expected and a number have been defined that are impor- tant paracrine regulators of stem-cell function. Within the Drosophila testis, Unpaired (UPD) is secreted by niche (hub) cells and induces stem-cell self-renewal via Janus kinase (JAK)–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signalling21,22 . In the Drosophila ovary, Decapentaplegic (DPP) is secreted after proteolytic cleavage and, along with another BMP analogue, Glass bottom boat (GBB), is produced by niche (cap) cells23,24 .
These stimulate SMAD signalling in the germ stem cells and result in suppression of differentiation, maintaining the self- renewing stem-cell state25 . Wingless-related proteins (WNTs) and their antagonists, soluble Notch modulators, FGFs and Hedgehog (HH) also contribute input in a paracrine manner with varying capacity to induce proliferation or impair differentiation. HH, however, has an additional intriguing function: it is secreted by cap cells and mediates proliferative effects not just on germ stem cells, but also on surrounding somatic cells composing the niche itself in the Drosophila ovary26,27 .
This effect on niche composition is a common theme of HH extending to mammals. HH family members have a role in topographic organization and for- mation of niches in development. Sonic hedgehog (SHH) is essential for hair-follicleformation,anddistinguishesthelocalizationofspecificsub- sets of epidermal stem cells to either the follicular niche or the interfol- licular epidermis28,29 . In addition, SHH participates in specific spatially restricted events within established niches. Hair represents a uniquely dynamic physical association of elements within a niche, owing to the change in distance during the hair cycle of the dermal papilla from the bulge region where at least some stem cells reside.
Expression of SHH is spatially and temporally restricted, and seems to modulate new hair formation30 , which is a function amenable to small-molecule manipula- tion31 . In the developing intestine, SHH and Indian hedgehog contribute to architectural patterning, playing a key part in assembly, dimensions and regularity of the crypts where stem cells reside32 . Therefore, HH contributions to stem-cell control are morphogenic, creating a niche, and regulating stem-cell fate within that niche.
Maintaining physical organization of the established niche is prob- ably an active and important process; however, the signals governing it are not well defined. Indirect evidence suggests that ephrins, important mediators of structural boundaries in neural and vascular tissue, might participate in at least one stem-cell system. Graduated expression of ephrin B1 and, reciprocally, its transmembrane tyrosine kinase recep- tors, EphB2 and EphB3, has been elegantly shown to organize mouse intestinal epithelial cells33 . Disrupted expression of the receptors leads to aberrant organization of crypt and villus cells, including cells at the interposition between them, which are defined as stem cells.
The altered topographic orientation of primitive and maturing cells results in poly- ploid outgrowths. Therefore, it will be important to discern molecular events sustaining architectural organization of the niche, particularly in considering how niche elements might participate in dysregulated growth in tumours.
Metabolism as an underexplored variable Cells, matrix glycoproteins and the three-dimensional spaces they form provide ultrastructure for a stem-cell niche. The contact between these elements allows molecular interactions that are critical for regu- lating stem-cell function. Secreted proteins offer a paracrine measure of control, but non-protein components of the local microenviron- ment also affect stem-cell function. One such participant was exam- ined for the haematopoietic niche based on the unusual mineral composition of the bone adjacent to which at least a portion of the stem cells reside.
It was proposed that because the endosteal surface is the location of bone remodelling, and osteoblasts and osteoclasts are often co-localized, the known high ionic calcium concentrations that exist near active osteoclasts might influence stem-cell function. Osteoblasts express receptor-activator of nuclear factor-B ligand (RANKL), which is essential for osteoclast differentiation and, thus, the proximity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. At the site of active bone remodelling, ionic concentrations have been observed that dramati- cally exceed serum levels and vary with osteoclast activity. Cells sense extracellular ionic calcium through the seven membrane-spanning calcium-sensing receptor (CaR).
This G-protein-coupled receptor was found to be expressed on a stem-cell-enriched population of bone-marrow haematopoietic cells, as well as select subsets of mature haematopoietic cells34 . Stem cells from mice genetically engineered to be CaR deficient had a markedly abnormal ability to engraft the bone marrow. They were functionally normal in the fetal liver and spleen, but were unable to engage with or be retained at the endosteal niche. Simple molecules, including inorganic ions, might contribute to niche function.
Metabolic products, such as calcium, which influence stem-cell behaviour in the niche are likely to represent a dimension of stem- cell control that allows cells to respond to varying conditions of tissue state. For example, oxidative stress markedly affects stem-cell func- tion. Under conditions in which ‘ataxia telangiectasia mutated’ (ATM) deficiency was induced, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulated in HS cells in the bone marrow35 . This was associated with increased a b Figure 1 | Refining elements necessary for an adult stem-cell niche. a, Early studies provided evidence that heterologous cell types created a three- dimensional structure in which stem cells reside.
b, Recent data raises the possibility that a regulatory microenvironment might include stem cells simply resident on the basement membrane with homologous cell–cell interactions. Stem cells are shown in deep green and more mature offspring are represented by a lighter shade.
1076 NATURE|Vol 441|29 June 2006 INSIGHT REVIEW NaturePublishing Group ©2006
levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor associated with senes- cence, p16INK4a, and with evidence of markedly decreased stem-cell function. Modifying ROS with anti-oxidants reduced p16INK4a and rescued stem-cell function. Challenges of oxidative stress are therefore likely to be important in altering stem-cell fate. The changing local metabolic conditions reflecting tissue state might thereby provide real- time information to modulate stem-cell function. Metabolic sensing is a likely mechanism by which stem cells gauge the ‘needs’ of a tissue or organism (Fig.
2). This requires further detailed anaylsis. What changes in a niche?
Experimental examination of systemic inputs to the niche might include measuring stem-cell number or proliferation. However, the haemat- opoietic system provides an additional feature, stem-cell trafficking, which can be readily quantitated, making it attractive as an experi- mental model. Stem-cell entry and exit from the niche are important components of haematopoietic niche function that are essential in development and persist in the adult. Bloodformationinearlydevelopmentoccursindistinctextra-embry- onic and embryonic sites. The yolk sac, aorto-gonadomesonephros (AGM), placenta and fetal liver participate in embryonic and definitive haematopoiesis in temporal sequence.
Early haematopoietic-cell pro- duction occurs with apparent independence in the yolk sac and AGM regions. When the fetal liver becomes a source of blood-cell production, this is thought to occur by virtue of cells migrating from the AGM or placenta. Similarly, as haematopoiesis transitions to the bone marrow, migration rather than de novo generation is thought to be critical. This is best exemplified by mice made genetically deficient in CaR, or in the chemokine CXCL12 or its cognate receptor CXCR4, which have normal production of fetal liver HS cells, but fail to transition to haematopoiesis in the marrow space34,36,37 .
These phenotypes are due to HS cells failing to move to the marrow niche.
The migratory nature of HS cells is therefore fundamental to their developmental programme and remains ongoing in adulthood. HS cells are found in the blood even under homeostatic conditions in mice and, from what can be estimated on the basis of imperfect measures, also in humans. These numbers can be dramatically modified on the basis of stimulation by several cytokines, including granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF and interleukin-8 (IL-8). The kinetics of mobilization by these factors varies markedly, reflecting differing mechanisms; however, one mechanism not appreciated until recently is the ability of G-CSF to modify niche cells.
G-CSF is capable of altering osteoblast activity sufficiently to reduce production of CXCL12, despite the absence of G-CSF recep- tors on these cells38 . It was an elegant, if serendipitous, discovery that mice with altered sympathetic nervous system function lack the ability to mobilize stem cells from the bone marrow in response to G-CSF39 .
Sympathetic nervous system input, whether induced by G-CSF or by neural agonists, modulates the niche sufficiently to change the localiza- tion of stem cells. As the nervous system is inherently a circuit capable of connecting anatomically disparate tissues, these studies indicate one potential means by which the stem cell might be able to ‘sense’ changes in the state of the tissue or the organism. If there are changes, such as distant injury, neural connections might mediate the response even at the stem-cell level.
Besides the nervous system, an obvious ready means of connect- ing localized sites with information from a distance is the circulatory system (Fig.
3). HS cells might directly exploit their frequent blood trafficking to ‘survey’ input at a distance and some other stem-cell types might do the same40–42 . More likely is the physical association of stem cells with the microvasculature. In development, the co-locali- zation of endothelial cells and progenitor populations from tissues as diverse as pancreas, heart, brain, liver, adrenal, bone and blood reflect the potential for regulatory signals generated by endothelium or nascent vasculature to affect primitive cell fate (reviewed in ref. 43). The adult hippocampus continues to generate neurons from precur- sor populations in perivascular loci that contain proliferating neural precursors, angioblasts and glial cells7 .
This region has been called an ‘angiogenic niche’. Similarly, HS cells have been observed in abun- dance in close physical association with bone-marrow microvessels using recently defined immunohistochemical reagents8 . The sites on such vessels where primitive cells engage and diapedese seem to be highly discontinuous, and are functionally distinguished by abundant CXCL12 and E-selectin expression44 . Although cells seem to reside there, only indirect data suggest that this represents a location that is regulating stem-cell function rather than just serving as a way-station for highly mobile cells.
It is likely that the perivascular site is indeed a niche; however, at present, the data on function that are necessary to confirm this conclusion are lacking for stem cells. The haematopoietic cells known to be regulated in association with marrow vessels are committed progenitors45 .
Matrix Extracellular (non-protein) Oxidative state, Ca2+ (M. musculus bone marrow) Niche cell Cap cell (D. melanogaster ovary) Distal tip cell (C. elegans gonad) Osteoblast (M. musculus bone marrow) Stem cell Germ stem cell (D. melanogaster ovary) Germ stem cell (C. elegans gonad) Haematopoietic stem cell (M. musculus bone marrow) Endothelial cell (M. musculus brain) Neural stem cell (M. musculus brain) Hub cell (D. melanogaster testis) Germ stem cell (D. melanogaster testis) Basement membrane (D. melanogaster intestine) Tenacin C (M. musculus brain) Osteopontin (M. musculus bone marrow) Figure 2 | Elements identified in stem-cell niches from various organisms and tissues.
Intentionally excluded are the complex molecular interactions that are present at the interface between the stem cell and its niche cell counterpart. These are reviewed extensively elsewhere54,55 .
C. elegans, Caenorhabditis elegans; D. melanogaster, Drosophila melanogaster; M. musculus, Mus musculus. Humoral Metabolic Physical Neural Paracrine Structural Figure 3 | Inputs feeding back on stem-cell function in the niche. Elements of the local environment that participate in regulating the system of a stem cell in its tissue state are depicted. These include the constraints of the architectural space, physical engagement of the cell membrane with tethering molecules on neighbouring cells or surfaces, signalling interactions at the interface of stem cells and niche or descendent cells, paracrine and endocrine signals from local or distant sources, neural input and metabolic products of tissue activity.
1077 NATURE|Vol 441|29 June 2006 INSIGHT REVIEW NaturePublishing Group ©2006
Although association with microvessels is an intuitively compelling meansforastemcellto be inan environmentwheresystem-widesignals can be sampled, the exact components of the vasculature that engage stem cells are still unclear. In certain circumstances, such as islet-cell proliferation, the basement membrane may again provide regulatory information46 . Endothelial cells have been implicated as directly induc- ing neural precursor Notch activation with resultant cell proliferation and differentiation in a manner that vascular smooth muscle cells do not47 .
Pericytes surrounding the endothelium might contribute to stem- cell regulation, and have been found to be closely associated with mes- enchymal stem cells48 . Endothelium, pericytes and surrounding smooth muscle are all candidate contributors to a perivascular niche for normal stem cells. They might also contribute to the foci of tumour-initiating or cancer stem cells thought to be responsible for blood-borne metastases. Recently, it was shown that such a site could be rendered more condu- cive to cancer-cell engraftment if modified by intravascular delivery of bone-marrow-derived vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-positive cells49 .
The idea that stem-cell niches can be modi- fied or created has experimental support in other systems as well. Under conditions of stress, such as fibrosis of the bone-marrow space, extramedullaryhaematopoiesisdevelopsinhumansandmice.Sitessuch as the spleen might re-kindle a developmental vestige (particularly in the mouse, in which the spleen is a haematopoietic organ) or engage entirely new sites, such as lymph nodes or soft tissue. These seem to function as regulatory niches for stem cells. Experimentally, niches can be generated by altered expression of single genes. Stabilized β-catenin expressed under the control of an epidermal-specific promoter resulted in de novo generation of hair follicles with a presumed attendant stem- cell pool50 .
Therefore, niches are not static in function or number, and can be created or made to change under specific conditions. What can a niche change?
The variability in niche number and function implicitly raises the issue of whether such modifications can participate in disease states or be induced to achieve therapeutic outcomes. Although altering normal stem-cell function is clearly one potential effect of altered niche dynamics, another more ominous possibility has been raised by lessons learned in Drosophila. Experimentally-induced stem- cell vacancy in the ovarian germ stem-cell niche did not result in immediate loss of niche structural integrity or potential. Rather, the empty niche could be occupied by somatic cells and, if not termi- nally differentiated, ectopic proliferation could ensue51 .
Furthermore, altered expression of a niche product, such as DPP, could induce more mature progenitor populations (cystocytes in Drosophila) to revert to a stem-cell phenotype52 . A stem-cell state could be imposed upon more mature cells. Although neither of these scenarios has been explored in vertebrate systems, these mechanisms could be predicted to result in niche-generated disease. Indeed, altering cells to acquire more stem-like features is consistent with recent applications of stem- cell biology to the understanding of cancer. The stem-cell paradigm might be more than just a means of understanding how malignant tissue is organized and how cancer might be modified by a specific microenvironment.
It raises the real possibility that a dysfunctional microenvironmental niche might contribute to the emergence of the disease (Fig. 4).
Modifying the niche If the niche is a dynamic structure that has the capacity to be formed anew, to respond to exogenous signals and to include varying com- ponents, this raises the question of whether the niche can be a target for therapeutic manipulation. There are compounds defined for use in other settings that could be considered for ‘re-purposing’ to affect the niche. Certainly, within the haematopoietic system, the associa- tion of the stem cell with bone raises the possibility that compounds developed for the modification of bone or mineral metabolism might have a role. Candidates include drugs that affect the osteoblast or osteoclast function of inhibiting molecular regulators of stem-cell interactions with the niche, such as drugs targeting the CaR and OPN receptors, or Notch.
Experimental evidence has shown that altering the niche pharmacologically can change stem-cell outcomes, with physiologic impact. For example, the use of parathyroid hormone (PTH) to stimulate the receptor on osteoblasts resulted in an increase in the number of stem cells under homeostatic conditions. When the setting was the physiologic stress of bone-marrow transplantation, dramatic results were noted. The animals receiving PTH had mark- edly improved marrow cellularity and increased rates of survival5 .
The stem cells do not have PTH receptors, so the effects are indirect and probably mediated by niche osteoblasts. This effect has been shown to protect resident HS cells from cytotoxic damage during exposure to chemotherapy drugs, to improve harvests of stem cells from treated animals and to improve engraftment outcome. Whether this paradigm of identifying characteristics of a niche to permit rational pharmacologic manipulation can be applied to other stem- cell systems needs to be tested further. However, if demonstrated, this would offer a novel approach to regenerative medicine. Thenicheasatargetincancertherapy With the recent development of the cancer stem-cell concept, which was first proposed half a century ago but was only empirically shown by the pioneering work of Dick and others, another dimension of the niche as a ‘druggable’ target is beginning to take shape53 .
If can- cer is organized in a manner similar to normal tissue, with a minor subpopulation of stem cells, an attendant blood supply and a unique microenvironment, there might be a similar dependence of the stem cells on a cancer niche. The possibility of a niche has been shown by multiple studies indicating distinctive features of non-cancerous cells within a tumour, and by the recent report of a population of bone- marrow-derived cells paving the way for subsequent establishment of a b c Figure 4 | Potential niche contribution to dysplastic cell growth. a, Normal interactions and occupancy of the niche tightly controls stem-cell number.
b, Vacancy in the niche might result in ectopic occupancy by another cell type. c, Niche signals might impose proliferative or de-differentiative signals, contributing to a disordered state of tissue organization and control. 1078 NATURE|Vol 441|29 June 2006 INSIGHT REVIEW NaturePublishing Group ©2006
a tumour focus. If the components of this niche could be demonstrated and targeted, it would be of considerable interest to modify the relative support of the stem-like cells of cancer. The idea that the niche might be a druggable target would be extremely appealing as an adjunctive and entirely independent means of targeting malignant cells. Perhaps the niche will be more than a biologist’s puzzle, and will become a guide for novel therapies to enhance the regenerative capacity of normal stem cells and limit the malignant potential of cancerous ones. ■ 1. Schofield, R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell.
BloodCells 4, 7–25 (1978). 2. Xie, T. & Spradling, A. C. A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in theDrosophila ovary. Science 290, 328–330 (2000).
3. Kiger, A. A., White-Cooper, H. & Fuller, M. T. Somatic support cells restrict germline stem cell self-renewal and promote differentiation.Nature 407, 750–754 (2000). 4. Crittenden, S. L. etal. A conserved RNA-binding protein controls germline stem cells in Caenorhabditiselegans. Nature 417,660–663 (2002). 5. Calvi, L. M. etal. Osteoblastic cells regulate the haematopoietic stem cell niche. Nature 425, 841–846 (2003). 6. Zhang, J. etal. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature 425, 836–841 (2003).
7. Palmer, T. D., Willhoite, A. R.
& Gage, F. H. Vascular niche for adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J.Comp.Neurol. 425, 479–494 (2000). 8. Kiel, M. J., Yilmaz, O. H., Iwashita, T., Terhorst, C. & Morrison, S. J. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121, 1109–1121 (2005). 9. Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. The adultDrosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature 439, 470–474 (2006).
10. Micchelli, C. A. & Perrimon, N. Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature 439, 475–479 (2006). 11. Jones,P.H.&Watt,F.M.Separationofhumanepidermalstemcellsfromtransitamplifyin g cellsonthebasisofdifferencesinintegrinfunctionandexpression.Cell73,713–724( 1993). 12. Jensen, U. B., Lowell, S. & Watt, F. M. The spatial relationship between stem cells and their progeny in the basal layer of human epidermis: a new view based on whole-mount labelling and lineage analysis. Development 126, 2409–2418 (1999). 13. Garcion, E., Halilagic, A., Faissner, A. & Ffrench-Constant, C.
Generation of an environmental niche for neural stem cell development by the extracellular matrix molecule tenascin C. Development 131,3423–3432 (2004).
14. Ohta, M., Sakai, T., Saga, Y., Aizawa, S. & Saito, M. Suppression of hematopoietic activity in tenascin-C-deficient mice. Blood 91,4074–4083 (1998). 15. Stier, S. etal. Osteopontin is a hematopoietic stem cell niche component that negatively regulates stem cell pool size.J.Exp.Med. 201,1781–1791 (2005). 16. Nilsson, S. K. etal. Osteopontin, a key component of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and regulator of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells.Blood 106, 1232–1239 (2005). 17. Ashkar, S. etal. Eta-1 (osteopontin): an early component of type-1 (cell-mediated) immunity. Science 287, 860–864 (2000).
18. Rangaswami, H., Bulbule, A. & Kundu, G. C. Osteopontin: role in cell signaling and cancer progression. TrendsCellBiol. 16,79–87 (2006). 19. Vermeulen, M. etal. Role of adhesion molecules in the homing and mobilization of murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 92, 894–900 (1998). 20. van der Loo, J. C. etal. VLA-5 is expressed by mouse and human long-term repopulating hematopoietic cells and mediates adhesion to extracellular matrix protein fibronectin. J.Clin.Invest. 102, 1051–1061 (1998).
21. Kiger, A. A., Jones, D. L., Schulz, C., Rogers, M. B. & Fuller, M. T. Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK–STAT activation in response to a support cell cue.Science 294, 2542–2545 (2001).
22. Tulina, N. & Matunis, E. Control of stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila spermatogenesis by JAK–STAT signaling. Science 294,2546–2549 (2001). 23. Xie, T. & Spradling, A. C. decapentaplegic is essential for the maintenance and division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Cell 94,251–260 (1998). 24. Song, X. etal. Bmp signals from niche cells directly repress transcription of a differentiation-promoting gene, bagofmarbles, in germline stem cells in theDrosophila ovary. Development 131,1353–1364 (2004).
25. Chen, D. & McKearin, D. Dpp signaling silences bam transcription directly to establish asymmetric divisions of germline stem cells.Curr.Biol. 13, 1786–1791 (2003). 26. Forbes, A. J., Lin, H., Ingham, P. W. & Spradling, A. C. hedgehog is required for the proliferation and specification of ovarian somatic cells prior to egg chamber formation in Drosophila. Development 122,1125–1135 (1996). 27. King, F. J., Szakmary, A., Cox, D. N. & Lin, H. Yb modulates the divisions of both germline and somatic stem cells through piwi- and hh-mediated mechanisms in the Drosophila ovary. Mol.Cell 7, 497–508 (2001).
28. St-Jacques, B. etal. Sonic hedgehog signaling is essential for hair development.Curr.Biol. 8, 1058–1068 (1998). 29. Levy, V., Lindon, C., Harfe, B. D. & Morgan, B. A. Distinct stem cell populations regenerate the follicle and interfollicular epidermis.Dev.Cell9, 855–861 (2005). 30. Oro, A. E. & Higgins, K. Hair cycle regulation of Hedgehog signal reception. Dev.Biol. 255, 238–248 (2003). 31. Paladini, R. D., Saleh, J., Qian, C., Xu, G. X. & Rubin, L. L. Modulation of hair growth with small molecule agonists of the hedgehog signaling pathway. J.Invest.Dermatol. 125, 638–646 (2005).
Madison, B. B. etal. Epithelial hedgehog signals pattern the intestinal crypt–villus axis. Development 132,279–289 (2005). 33. Batlle, E. etal. β-Catenin and TCF mediate cell positioning in the intestinal epithelium by controlling the expression of EphB/ephrinB. Cell 111,251–263 (2002). 34. Adams, G. B. etal. Stem cell engraftment at the endosteal niche is specified by the calcium- sensing receptor. Nature 439,599–603 (2006). 35. Ito, K. etal. Regulation of oxidative stress by ATM is required for self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature431, 997–1002 (2004).
36. Zou, Y. R., Kottmann, A. H., Kuroda, M., Taniuchi, I. & Littman, D. R. Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature 393, 595–599 (1998). 37. Ma, Q. etal. Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc.NatlAcad.Sci.USA 95,9448–9453 (1998). 38. Semerad, C. L. etal. G-CSF potently inhibits osteoblast activity and CXCL12 mRNA expression in the bone marrow. Blood 106,3020–3027 (2005). 39. Katayama, Y. etal. Signals from the sympathetic nervous system regulate hematopoietic stem cell egress from bone marrow.Cell 124,407–421 (2006).
40. Lee, O. K. etal. Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood 103,1669–1675 (2004).
41. Rieger, K. etal. Mesenchymal stem cells remain of host origin even a long time after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation.Exp.Hematol. 33, 605–611 (2005). 42. Johnson, J. etal. Oocyte generation in adult mammalian ovaries by putative germ cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Cell 122,303–315 (2005). 43. Cleaver, O. & Melton, D. A. Endothelial signaling during development.NatureMed. 9, 661–668 (2003). 44. Sipkins, D. A. etal.Invivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature 435, 969–973 (2005).
Avecilla, S. T. et al. Chemokine-mediated interaction of hematopoietic progenitors with the bone marrow vascular niche is required for thrombopoiesis. Nature Med. 10, 64–71 (2004). 46. Nikolova, G. etal. The vascular basement membrane: a niche for insulin gene expression and β cell proliferation. Dev.Cell 10, 397–405 (2006). 47. Shen, Q. etal. Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science 304, 1338–1340 (2004). 48. Shi, S. & Gronthos, S. Perivascular niche of postnatal mesenchymal stem cells in human bone marrow and dental pulp. J.BoneMiner.Res.
18, 696–704 (2003). 49. Kaplan, R. N. etal. VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature 438, 820–827 (2005).
50. Gat, U., DasGupta, R., Degenstein, L. & Fuchs, E. Denovo hair follicle morphogenesis and hair tumors in mice expressing a truncated β-catenin in skin. Cell 95, 605–614 (1998). 51. Kai, T. & Spradling, A. An empty Drosophila stem cell niche reactivates the proliferation of ectopic cells. Proc.NatlAcad.Sci.USA 100, 4633–4638 (2003). 52. Kai, T. & Spradling, A. Differentiating germ cells can revert into functional stem cells in Drosophila melanogaster ovaries. Nature 428, 564–569 (2004).
53. Lapidot, T. etal. A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice.
Nature 367, 645–648 (1994). 54. Li, L. & Xie, T. Stem cell niche: structure and function. Annu.Rev.CellDev.Biol. 21, 605–631 (2005). 55. Ohlstein, B., Kai, T., Decotto, E. & Spradling, A. The stem cell niche: theme and variations. Curr.Opin.CellBiol. 16,693–699 (2004). Acknowledgements The author gratefully acknowledges H. Fleming and C. Lo Celso for their helpful input, C. Shambaugh for administrative assistance, and grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Burroughs Wellcome Trust, and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society for supporting this work. Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.
com/reprintsandpermissions. The author declares competing financial interests: details accompany the paper at www.nature.com/nature. Correspondence should be addressed to the author (email@example.com). 1079 NATURE|Vol 441|29 June 2006 INSIGHT REVIEW NaturePublishing Group ©2006