Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln

Page created by Brandon Gibbs
 
CONTINUE READING
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting:
Example: University of Cologne
Oliver Diehl, Köln

Konferenz:
Energieeffizienzmarkt und -dienstleistungen in Deutschland und Frankreich
Di. 6. März 2018 - Berlin
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
AGENDA

  Chapter 1   Motivation for energy-efficiency-contracting

  Chapter 2   How does energy-efficiency-contracting work?

              An example of energy-efficiency-contracting:
  Chapter 3   University of Cologne - BioZ
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
Motivation for
energy-efficiency-contracting
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
Reasons for energetic renovation

     Technology and facade are in need of renovation
     High energy costs
     Legal requirements:

         • ENEV
         • e.g. energetic inspection for HVAC and cooling systems
         • Energy management - DIN EN ISO 50.001

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)   4
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
energy renovation: customer aims

                                                                                                       low
                                                                                                    investment
                                                                                                        cost
                                      sustainability
                                                                                                                         low
                                                                                                                    operating cost

             simple                                                                                                                  low
                                                                                                                                   energy
                                                                                                                                 consumption

                                                               Optimal building / facility

                                        increased                                                                    low
                                         comfort /                                                               care expenses
                                          safety
                                                                                               high
                                                                                            availability

06.03.2018    Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)                                              5
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
Process of a common renovation process

                                                 selection of one
                                                                                               planning   tender offer &   implementation
                 idea                                or more
                                                                                               process       award          / construction
                                                     planners

                  Planners & technical trades, that usually work together during an
                  energy renovation project:
                   • HVAC, sanitary engineering
                   • electric
                   • control
                   • structural engineer
                   • construction services
                   • fire protection
                   • Other topics / reviewers

                  Many individual trades / partners that need to be coordinated

                  Project controller or general planner

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)                                             6
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
Technical interfaces during a usual planning process

     Evaluation of the situation:
         • Bad documentation
         • Not all piping / cable route can be inspected
         • assumptions to be made at certain points

     Technical coordination of the individual trades, during the planning phase or
     execution phase is difficult.
     After putting-into-operation:
     Both, planners and executing companies, usually abandon the site after approval
     and final invoice.
     There is no re-optimization of the system !!

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)   7
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
Where do the individual participants earn their money?

     Planner / project controller
         • %-rate of investment / lump sum
         • additional services

     Executive ev. Building
         • construction of the plant
         • supplements
         • usage of alternative products

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)   8
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
How does energy-efficiency-
contracting work?
Energy-Efficiency-Contracting: Example: University of Cologne - Oliver Diehl, Köln
James Watt: father of energy-efficiency-contracting

                                                                                         The basic idea of energy service contracting can
                                                                                         be attributed to James Watt, inventor and
                                                                                         mechanical engineer .

                                                                                         To market his steam engine, his strategy was not
                                                                                         to sell it, but to make it available only for hire.
                                                                                         He guaranteed his customers that the cost using
                                                                                         his steam engine would not exceed the cost of
                                                                                         their cattle/horse feed.

                                                                                         This basic idea is the principle of so-called
                                                                                         energy-efficiency-contracting.

                                                                                         (James Watt, 1736 - 1819)

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)                                               10
Goals and characteristics of energy-efficiency-contracting

                                         600.000
                                                                                                 Laufzeit Contracting
                                                                                                                                                             Energiekosten
             Nettoenergiekosten [€/a]

                                         500.000
                                                                                                                                                             Haushaltsentlastung
                                         400.000                                                                                                             des Kunden

                                         300.000                                                                                                             Refinanzierung der
                                                                                                                                                             Investition
                                         200.000                                                                                                             Betriebs- und
                                                                                                                                                             Brennstoffkosten
                                         100.000
                                                                                                                                                             IST-Kosten
                                                    0
                                                            2013             2014               2015          2016             2017   2018    2019    2020
                                                                                                              Zeitverlauf [a]
                                                  Investitionszeitpunkt des                                                      Übergabe an den Kunden
                                                         Contractors

                                           Immediate budget relief right from the beginning of the contract

                                           Another increase of savings after the end of contracting due to the elimination
                                           of the contracting rate

                                                                                                                                                                                        11
06.03.2018                              Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln    (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)                                                       11
Expiration of a energy-efficiency-contracting

                                         Selection of an
                                                                                                                       Implementation /
              idea                           ESCo                           rough analysis         detailed analysis                      savings phase
                                                                                                                         construction
                                           consultant

                  ESCo-consultant
                   • Create a baseline
                   • Create a very rough inventory
                   • Determine mandatory measure

                  Rough analysis
                   • competition phase
                   • Competition of different savings concepts?
                      Target determination of the concept with the highest utility value
                      (profitability) for the customer

                  detailed analysis / construction / savings phase
                    • a contractor is responsible for planning, implementation and achieving
                       savings (guarantee).
                    • Energetically optimal operation of the plant / building.

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)                                                          12
Our approach

                                                                                                                     savings phase
                                                                                                                     • financing
                                                                                                    implementation   • monitoring
                                                                                                                     • reduction
                                                                                                    • planning         certificate
                                                                                                    • realization

                                                                     detailed
                                                                     analysis

                             rough
                             analysis

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln    (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)                                    13
Advantages of the energy-efficiency-contracting

                          • Fixed costs over the contract period
      savings
                          • Guaranteed savings
     guarantee

                          • Competition in the rough analysis determines the most economical concept for the
                            customer
 Most economical
                          • No "unnecessary" investments
    concept               • Full cost analysis (maintenance and service included)

                          • Planning and implementation from a single source
                          • Full responsibility of the contractor over all cycles of the ESCo
 Fewer interfaces

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)               14
Example of a energy-efficiency-
contracting:
University of Cologne - BioZ
Baseline

                                                             Kosten
                 2013               Einheit      Menge                      Baseline
                                                           je Einheit
 Fernwärme (Arbeit gesamt - 2013)   MWh       2.900,0    66,5430 EUR    192.974,70 EUR
 Strom (Arbeit gesamt - 2013)       MWh       8.389,4    146,7305 EUR 1.230.981,15 EUR

 Gesamtkosten                                                           1.423.955,85 EUR

             Specific consumption:

             main floor space: 14.800 m²
                 - Heat:        195,9 kWh/m²xa
                 - electricity: 566,9 kWh/m²xa
offer data

                                                           FA                         FA
                    Angebots-
                                                    mit LED-Technik            ohne LED-Technik
                    übersicht                          (Pflanzen)                 (Pflanzen)

     Basisverbrauch:                               1.423.809,12 €/a            1.423.809,12 €/a

     Einspargarantie:                              560.199,40 €/a     39,35%   491.943,52 €/a     34,55%

     Haushaltsentlastung Kunde:                     89.285,31 €/a     15,94%   118.339,98 €/a     24,06%

     Contractingrate:                               470.914,09 €/a    84,06%    373.603,54 €/a    75,94%

     Kaufpreis:                                     3.044.603,55 €              2.356.741,69 €

     davon Planung / Engineering                    371.760,00 €      12,2%     337.920,00 €      14,3%

     davon Technische Geräte, Anlagen, Sachen       2.672.843,55 €    87,8%     2.018.821,69 €    85,7%

     Statischer ROI (Kaufpreis/Einspargarantie):      5,43 Jahre                  4,79 Jahre

     Vertragslaufzeit:                                10,0 Jahre                  10,0 Jahre

     Überschießende Einsparung:                     50,0 % (AG)                 50,0 % (AG)
offer data

                                                                                       Energien
    Zusammenfassung
        Energien                   Basis                                      ESC                                                Einsparung
                            Arbeit            Leistung            Arbeit            Leistung                       Arbeit                           Leistung
 Fernwärme                  2.900,0 MWh/a          -     kW      1.572,9 MWh/a              -   kW           1.327,1 MWh/a    45,8%          -     kW

 Strom                      8.389,4 MWh/a          -     kW      5.173,4 MWh/a              -   kW           3.216,0 MWh/a    38,3%          -     kW

                                                                                 Kosten (Preisbasis 2013)
    Zusammenfassung
         Kosten                             Basis                                                ESC                                                Einsparung
                          Arbeit            Leistung          Summe               Arbeit        Leistung          Summe                   Arbeit                   Gesamt
 Fernwärme                192.975 €/a          -   €/a         192.975 €/a        104.668 €/a    -     €/a         104.668 €/a         88.307 €/a   45,8%       88.307 €/a   45,8%
 Strom                   1.230.981 €/a         -   €/a        1.230.981 €/a       759.089 €/a    -     €/a         759.089 €/a        471.893 €/a   38,3%      471.893 €/a   38,3%
 Summe                   1.423.956 €/a         -   €/a        1.423.956 €/a       863.756 €/a    -     €/a         863.756 €/a        560.199 €/a   39,3%      560.199 €/a   39,3%

                CO2                  CO2-Äquivalente                 Einsparung            CO2-Minderung

             Minderung                        t/MWh                     MWh/a                        t/a

 Elektroenergie                               0,57636                   3.216,0                 1.853,6

 Fernwärme                                     0,219                    1.327,1                  290,6

 Summe:                                                                                         2.144,2                      39,2% C02-saving
fresh air intake

tender:
    ─ Installation of two new intake towers

                       1                      Position        Ort         Geschwindigkeit     ∆p
                                                 1     Wetterschutzgitter     2,4 m/s        32 Pa
                                                 2        Filterwand          2,3 m/s        90 Pa
                                                 3        Kanal links         9,5 m/s       124 Pa
                                                 4       Kanal rechts         7,5 m/s       75 Pa

                                          2

3                                                      4
Digestories - daytime operation

         daytime operation 8-times * air change
         Operation via timer program 8:00 - 18:00 o'clock
         Additionally: Presence detector installation, if present above time schedual

   Tagbetrieb                                                                                      Abluft 480 m³/h

                                                                         ERR
                                 8/4-facher
                                 Luftwechsel                                                                         Abluft 50 m³/h

        Zuluft 480 m³/h

      Dauer EIN                    ZSP

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)                                      20
Digestories - nighttime operation

         Time switch program / presence detector inactive => halves the air exchange
         Interlocking alarm message Digestories

   Nachtbetrieb - abgesenkt                                                                                 Abluft 240 m³/h

                                                                         ERR
                                 2/4-facher
                                 Luftwechsel                                                                                  Abluft 50 m³/h

        Zuluft 240 m³/h

      Dauer EIN                    ZSP                                                       Verriegelung
                                                                                             Alarmmeldung

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)                                               21
Optimization of refrigeration

                                                                   KM 1:
                                                                     – Quantum X120
  Installation of magnetically-levated turbocompressor               – 1000 kW cooling capacity
  (Quantum X120) + Free cooling
                                                                   KM 2:
                                                                     – Carrier 30HXC345.133
                   Trockenrückkühler                                 – 1000 kW cooling capacity

                                                                   Free cooling:
      6+7                4+5             1+2+3                        – Change at outside temperature
                                                                         < 4°C
                                                                      – 200 kW cooling capacity

                                                                   Recooling plants:
                                                                     – 7 dry coolers
                                                                     – Condensation capacity: 2516 kW
       Verteiler                        Sammler

       KM1                             KM2                                       Puffer-
                                                                                speicher
                                       Carrier
                                                             WT
                                                         Glykol/
      Quantum
                                                         Wasser
building lighting

  Installation of modern LED technology on a total of
  1,737 lights
plant lighting
Projekt des Monats der EnergieAgentur NRW (März 2018)
http://www.energieagentur.nrw/eanrw/energieverbrauch_reduziert_biozentrum_der_uni_koeln_spart_500.000_euro_pro_jahr

Energieverbrauch
06.03.2018
                                reduziert – Biozentrum der Uni Köln spart 500.000 Euro pro Jahr durch Contracting.htm25
           Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)
Thank you for your attention

06.03.2018   Einsparcontracting: Das Beispiel der Universität Köln   (oliver.diehl@de.engie.com)   26
You can also read