The socio-cultural benefits and costs of the traditional hunting of dugongs Dugong dugon and green turtles Chelonia mydas in Torres Strait, Australia

Page created by Johnny Jackson
 
CONTINUE READING
The socio-cultural benefits and costs of the traditional hunting of dugongs Dugong dugon and green turtles Chelonia mydas in Torres Strait, Australia
The socio-cultural benefits and costs of the
             traditional hunting of dugongs Dugong dugon
             and green turtles Chelonia mydas in
             Torres Strait, Australia
                                                       AURÉLIE DELISLE, MILENA KIATKOSKI KIM, NATALIE STOECKL
                                                                         F E L E C I A W A T K I N L U I and H E L E N E M A R S H

             Abstract Signatory states of the Convention on Biological                              monetary compensation for the loss of provisioning services
             Diversity must ‘protect and encourage the customary use                                only.
             of biological resources in accordance with traditional
                                                                                                    Keywords Chelonia mydas, cognitive mapping, cultural
             cultural practices that are compatible with conservation or
                                                                                                    values, dugong, Dugong dugon, green turtle, Torres Strait,
             sustainable use requirements’. Thus the management of
                                                                                                    traditional hunting
             traditional hunting of wildlife must balance the sustainabil-
             ity of target species with the benefits of hunting to traditional                      Supplementary material for this article is available at
             communities. Conservation policies usually define the values                           https://doi.org/./S
             associated with wild meats in terms of income and nutrition,
             neglecting a wide range of social and cultural values that are
             important to traditional hunting communities. We elicited
             the community-defined benefits and costs associated with                               Introduction
             the traditional hunting of dugongs Dugong dugon and
             green turtles Chelonia mydas from communities on two is-
             lands in Torres Strait, Australia. We then used cognitive                              T     he hunting of terrestrial and marine wildlife is typi-
                                                                                                          cally considered to be a matter of conservation concern,
                                                                                                    even though it can be an important source of livelihood to
             mapping and multidimensional scaling to identify separable
             groups of benefits (cultural services, provisioning services,                          local communities (Nasi et al., ), particularly indigen-
             and individual benefits) and demonstrate that traditional                              ous communities. Scientific studies have described the nega-
             owners consider the cultural services associated with trad-                            tive impacts of hunting on wildlife, particularly on the native
             itional hunting to be significantly more important than the                            biota in Africa (e.g. Bowen-Jones & Pendry, ; Brashares
             provisioning services. Understanding these cultural values                             et al., ). Research on the hunting of marine mammals
             can inform management actions in accordance with the                                   and turtles is somewhat less common (Sohou et al., )
             Convention on Biological Diversity. If communities are un-                             despite the fact that, since , people in at least 
             able to hunt, important cultural benefits are foregone. Based                          countries have consumed one or more of at least  marine
             on our results, we question the appropriateness of conserva-                           mammal species (Robards & Reeves, ). Green turtles
             tion actions focused on prohibiting hunting and providing                              Chelonia mydas are still harvested legally for food in several
                                                                                                    range states despite being categorized as Endangered at a
                                                                                                    global scale (Seminoff, ).
                                                                                                        Historically, the development of species management
             AURÉLIE DELISLE*† (Corresponding author) James Cook University, College of             tools has generally been guided by knowledge of the species’
             Business Law and Governance, Douglas, Queensland, Australia
             E-mail adelisle@uow.edu.au                                                             biology, with limited attention to the broader context of
             MILENA KIATKOSKI KIM‡ and HELENE MARSH James Cook University, College of
                                                                                                    management and the impacts of actions on the users of
             Science and Engineering, Douglas, Queensland, Australia                                wildlife. However, the impacts of conservation actions
             NATALIE STOECKL James Cook University, Division of Tropical Environments and           such as hunting regulations on local communities, and their
             Societies, Douglas, Queensland, Australia                                              rights to be involved in management, are now being
             FELECIA WATKIN LUI James Cook University, Aboriginal and Torres Strait                 acknowledged. Hence, wildlife managers and conservation
             Islander Centre, Cairns, Queensland, Australia, and James Cook University,             organizations face the challenge of minimizing the negative
             The Cairns Institute, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
                                                                                                    impacts of hunting on the long-term sustainability of wild-
             *Also at: James Cook University, College of Science and Engineering, Douglas,
             Queensland, Australia                                                                  life while enhancing the positive impacts (Nasi et al., ;
             †Also at: University of Wollongong, Australian National Centre for Ocean               Nyaki et al., ; Duffy et al., ).
             Resources & Security, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia                               In the s, as wildlife managers and conservation prac-
             ‡Also at: James Cook University, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Centre,
             Cairns, Queensland, Australia                                                          titioners began to recognize the important links between
             Received  March . Revision requested  May .                                  biodiversity and people, there was a concurrent movement
             Accepted  September . First published online  December .                   to recognize the rights of indigenous peoples. These

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
Traditional hunting in Torres Strait                251

           processes led to the explicit international recognition of the                         calories and purchasing power rather than the holistic
           role of indigenous peoples in the conservation and sustain-                            nature of food security held by indigenous people such as
           able use of biodiversity. Two articles (article (j) on trad-                          the Alaskan Inuit, who consider food security to encompass
           itional knowledge, innovations and practices, and article                              both cultural and environmental systems (Inuit Circumpolar
           (c) on customary sustainable uses of biodiversity) were in-                          Council-Alaska, ).
           cluded in the Convention on Biological Diversity. Article                                The difficulties of incorporating the social dimensions of
           (c) requires signatory states (Parties) to ‘protect and encour-                        indigenous hunting into contemporary management are
           age the customary use of biological resources in accordance                            compounded when the target species (marine and terres-
           with traditional cultural practices that are compatible with                           trial) are of conservation concern (e.g. dugongs Dugong
           conservation or sustainable use requirements’. Both articles                           dugon and green turtles Chelonia mydas in Australia; beluga
           thus bind Parties to the Convention to respect, protect and                            Delphinapterus leucas and bowhead whales Balaena mysti-
           promote traditional knowledge, innovations and practices.                              cetus in the Arctic). Policies are usually defined according to
           These articles also oblige Parties to protect and encourage                            the predominant discourse based on a value system that nar-
           customary uses of biological resources in accordance with                              rowly defines hunting values and does not reflect the spec-
           traditional cultural practices. The articles can be adapted                            trum of values identified by direct resource user groups
           at the national and local levels to strengthen indigenous                              (Turner et al., ). Moreover, the costs and benefits asso-
           involvement in decision making in the sustainable use of                               ciated with hunting (or the conservation policies regulating
           biodiversity (Sutherland, ).                                                       such activity) are generally more salient to the members of
                                                                                                  indigenous communities than to the outside organizations
           Cultural dimensions of hunting                                                         that typically develop conservation policies (Nyaki et al.,
                                                                                                  ). Thus, clarifying the range of benefits and costs asso-
           The most obvious positive outcomes of hunting are its con-                             ciated with hunting, and their relative importance from the
           tributions to nutrition, food security, income generation                              perspective of indigenous hunting communities, can help
           and livelihoods in rural and remote areas (Bassett, ;                              the development of understanding about the potential im-
           Nasi et al., ). These outcomes apply not only to the                               pacts of conservation policies on these communities. The
           hunters themselves but also to others along the supply                                 risks of not considering the range of impacts resulting
           chain (Crookes & Milner-Gulland, ; Allebone-Webb                                   from policies may have severe negative consequences for
           et al., ). Nevertheless, the range of motivations, benefits                        indigenous peoples (Turner et al., ); for example, re-
           and costs associated with hunting can be more comprehen-                               searchers have highlighted eight invisible losses experienced
           sive than these values, especially for indigenous and trad-                            by First Nation communities in western North America as a
           itional groups. Indigenous communities have particularly                               result of a lack of recognition of cultural values during the
           strong connections with nature, as their way of life often de-                         development of environmental policies that affected their
           pends on their access to natural resources (United Nations                             access to traditional lands and resources (Turner et al.,
           Environment Programme, ), and traditional cultures                                 ). Losses included lifestyle losses, loss of identity, health
           can help maintain the diversity and resilience of natural sys-                         losses, loss of self-determination, emotional losses, loss of
           tems (Bélair et al., ).                                                            order in the world, knowledge losses, and indirect economic
               Anthropologists and ethnoecologists have studied the                               losses (Turner et al., ).
           cultural values of hunting (Cocks et al., ; Peterson,                                  Such social impacts are not confined to indigenous
           ), emphasizing the important cultural role that the                                groups. In the development of marine national parks, man-
           hunting and sharing of wild meats (which may include ter-                              agers in New South Wales, Australia, did not fully recognize
           restrial and marine species of conservation interest) plays in                         social impacts on commercial fishers of banning commer-
           the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge, cul-                             cial fishing in some areas. Fishers reported that the man-
           tural identity, and medicinal and spiritual values, and in                             agers considered only economic impacts when making
           the maintenance of community cohesion (van Vliet et al.,                               their decision, and ignored the loss of well-being and com-
           ; Kalland, ; Reo & Whyte, ; Baggio et al., ;                           munity cohesion (Momtaz & Gladstone, ). As a result,
           BurnSilver et al., ; Watkin Lui et al., a). However,                           fishers became distrustful of the local management author-
           the incorporation of the social and cultural dimensions of                             ity (Voyer et al., ).
           hunting is still relatively undeveloped in contemporary                                    A potential explanation for the lack of recognition or legit-
           management practices (Nasi et al., ), and conservation                             imacy of cultural values in the policy arena may stem from the
           policies based on Western concepts usually define the values                           types of assessments used to describe non-market values.
           of wild meats solely in terms of income and protein (Nyaki                             Policy makers and managers may respond better to market
           et al., ). Even a widely discussed concept such as food                            values such as income because they are quantifiable for com-
           security, often regarded as a direct benefit of hunting, is                            parison with other values. Moreover, research indicates that
           often based on a Western definition focusing on nutrition,                             decision makers are more inclined to use ecological indicators

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
252         A. Delisle et al.

             and market studies rather than non-market valuation studies,                           their relationships. The variables can represent physical or
             at least partially because of the complexity of the methods                            abstract ideas (Özesmi & Özesmi, ). The person making
             (Rogers et al., ). Non-market valuation studies such as                            the cognitive map decides on the important variables that af-
             contingent valuation have also been criticized as being unsuit-                        fect a system and then either draws causal relationships
             able for research in indigenous communities (Adamowicz                                 among these variables (i.e. causal mapping), with the possi-
             et al., ; Venn & Quiggin, ).                                                   bility of indicating the relative strength of the relationships
                 The sharing of food (BurnSilver et al., ) is a corner-                         with a number between − and  (i.e. fuzzy causal mapping),
             stone of whaling by indigenous communities in the                                      or decides how the variables are interrelated (i.e. concept map-
             Alaskan Arctic and is integral to maintaining community co-                            ping). Such techniques are used to study decision making and
             hesion. Nonetheless, the system has been described mostly in                           people’s perceptions of complex social systems (Axelrod, ;
             a qualitative rather than a quantitative manner (BurnSilver                            Brown, ; Carley & Palmquist, ) and have been applied
             et al., ). Baggio et al. () and BurnSilver et al. ()                       successfully in natural resource management to improve deci-
             analysed social networks, harvest and household economic                               sion making, define management objectives and analyse sta-
             data to quantify the importance of indigenous whaling in                               keholders’ perceptions of ecosystems (Radomski & Goeman,
             the Alaskan Arctic. This quantitative assessment combined                              ; Özesmi & Özesmi, ; Hobbs et al., ; Mendoza &
             with more descriptive studies of the complex values asso-                              Prabhu, ). Cognitive mapping and other mental model
             ciated with indigenous hunting can assist in formulating a                             techniques have been particularly useful in describing how
             narrative and policies looking at the future of indigenous                             various stakeholder groups perceive a similar natural resource
             communities in the face of global environmental change                                 management issue. In cases of human–wildlife conflict, the
             (Baggio et al., ; BurnSilver et al., ).                                        reasons and potential solutions can vary between policy ma-
                                                                                                    kers and other stakeholder groups (Mosimane et al., ). A
             A participatory approach to understanding costs and                                    better understanding of how various people interpret a similar
             benefits of indigenous hunting                                                         problem can identify areas of agreement and disagreement,
                                                                                                    and can be the precursor in establishing a closer working re-
             The ecosystem services concept has been used widely to                                 lationship towards effective environmental policy and deci-
             identify the values people derive from ecosystems, including                           sion making (Mosimane et al., ). All cognitive mapping
             through extractive activities such as hunting and fishing                              techniques try to understand how an individual interprets
             (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ; Chan et al.,                                   concepts, and describe those concepts and their relationships
             a). Most users of the Ecosystem Services Framework                                 in a graphical layout (Fiol & Huff, ).
             emphasize the economic valuation of tangible services                                      We used cognitive mapping to address the following
             over the identification of intangible benefits associated                              questions: What are the social–cultural costs and benefits
             with social and cultural values (Chan et al., b). Using                            associated with traditional hunting of marine megafauna
             economic valuations to inform decision making can be                                   from the perspective of an indigenous community? How
             problematic, as the intangible benefits associated with                                are the costs and benefits linked/grouped, and what is
             Ecosystem Services can matter more to people than the                                  their relative importance? The cultural significance of the
             monetary benefits (Chan et al., b). Accordingly, the                               species and the fact that the meat cannot be sold helps to
             effective identification and prioritization of the values de-                          emphasize the social and cultural rather than the monetary
             rived from ecosystems requires the use of qualitative and                              values of hunting.
             participatory methods that include the perspectives of com-
             munities that are more closely linked with such ecosystems                             Case study: traditional fisheries in Torres Strait, Australia
             and are therefore potentially affected by management
             actions (Chan et al., a).                                                          Most of the people living in the Torres Strait region between
                We used a participatory modelling approach known as                                 Australia and Papua New Guinea are indigenous (ABS,
             cognitive mapping to investigate the costs and benefits of                             ) (Fig. ). Dugongs and green turtles (hereafter turtles)
             the traditional hunting of two culturally significant species                          have significant cultural importance for Torres Strait
             in an area inhabited by indigenous, natural resource                                   Islanders and have been hunted for millennia. The turtle
             dependent communities. Our approach avoids the use of                                  harvest originated at least , years ago (Wright, ),
             contingent valuation but still defines costs and benefits, as                          and the dugong harvest at least , years ago (Crouch
             non-market valuation estimates are generally part of a                                 et al., ). The remains of thousands of dugong bones
             cost–benefit analysis (Supplementary Material ). Cognitive                            in middens indicate that the harvest has been substantial
             mapping is an umbrella term that encompasses such techni-                              for at least – years (McNiven, ), pre-dating
             ques as causal, semantic and concept mapping. A cognitive                              European settlement in the th century.
             map is a qualitative model describing the elements of a                                    Torres Strait currently supports the largest population of
             given system. The map uses defined variables and describes                             dugongs globally (Marsh et al., b). A population decline

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
Traditional hunting in Torres Strait                253

                                                                                                  to hunt dugongs and turtles in their Sea Country (an
                                                                                                  Australian indigenous term that relates to the ‘authority
                                                                                                  held and responsibilities of particular groups of traditional
                                                                                                  owners to particular areas of sea, and is based on cultural
                                                                                                  relationships with these areas’; Plagányi et al., ). This
                                                                                                  right is upheld under the Australian Native Title (e.g.
                                                                                                  Native Title Act ) and environment laws in accordance
                                                                                                  with the Torres Strait Fisheries Act , which facilitate the
                                                                                                  Torres Strait Treaty between Australia and Papua New
                                                                                                  Guinea (Havemann & Smith, ). Operationally, these
                                                                                                  fisheries are managed at the community level through 
                                                                                                  non-statutory community-based turtle and dugong man-
                                                                                                  agement plans (Marsh et al., a).
                                                                                                      Our research was conducted in two remote indigenous is-
                                                                                                  land communities in the Australian waters of Torres Strait
                                                                                                  (Fig. ). In  there were close to , Torres Strait
                                                                                                  Islanders and/or Aboriginal people living in the region
                                                                                                  (OESR, ), including c.  and  residents in our
                                                                                                  study communities of Mabuiag and St Paul’s, respectively
                                                                                                  (Fig. ).
                                                                                                      Dugongs and green turtles are cultural keystone species
                                                                                                  in Torres Strait (Butler et al., ), defining Torres Strait
                                                                                                  Islanders wherever they reside (Watkin Lui et al., b).
           FIG. 1 Locations of the study communities of Mabuiag and St                            The hunting and distribution of dugong and turtle meat
           Paul’s (circled) in Torres Strait, Australia.
                                                                                                  are part of Ailan Kastom (island custom). The Cambridge
                                                                                                  Expedition (Haddon, ) reported that green turtles and
                                                                                                  dugongs were an essential part of the diet of Mabuiag
           has not been detected by aerial surveys of dugongs conducted                           Islanders, a fact confirmed by subsequent studies in
           during – (Marsh et al., ; Hagihara et al., ),                          Torres Strait (Nietschmann, ; Bliege Bird & Bird, ;
           probably because dugongs are harvested in only % of the                               Bliege Bird et al., ; Kwan et al., ). Both species are
           , km of very high dugong density habitat as the result                            also important for ceremonies (Fitzpatrick-Nietschmann,
           of cultural and government controls on the harvest, and                                ), and hunting confers prestige and recognition within
           socio-economic factors. Contemporary evidence thus sug-                                the community on the hunters of eastern Torres Strait
           gests that the dugong harvest in Torres Strait is sustainable                          (Bliege Bird et al., ).
           (Marsh et al., ; Hagihara et al., ; Urwin et al., ).                           In common with other indigenous peoples, the residents
               Torres Strait also provides foraging grounds for abundant                          of the two study communities are at a significant socio-
           stocks of juvenile and adult turtles (Limpus, ; Fuentes                            economic disadvantage compared with the wider commu-
           et al., ; Hagihara et al., ) and is an important corridor                      nity. Almost % of jobs in Mabuiag and St Paul’s are avail-
           for populations migrating between eastern Indonesia, the                               able only to residents who participate in an employment
           Arufura Sea, the Gulf of Carpentaria and the northern                                  benefit scheme (Delisle, ). Residents earn c. % of
           Great Barrier Reef (Limpus & Parmenter, ). The level                               what their Australian counterparts earn. Each community
           of hunting of green turtles in Torres Strait is likely to be sus-                      has only one general store at which to purchase food, and
           tainable (Hagihara et al., ). However, there are concerns                          the mean price of commodities is c. % higher than on
           about the long-term future of the turtle stock, largely because                        the mainland. Community residents thus face the double
           of mounting evidence of environmentally caused recruitment                             burden of low income and high prices, with real incomes
           failure at Raine Island in the northern Great Barrier Reef, the                        substantially below those of their non-indigenous mainland
           largest green turtle rookery (Limpus, ).                                           counterparts.
               As a signatory to CITES and the Convention on                                          The spending pattern of residents is also different from
           Biological Diversity, Australia has multiple responsibilities                          that of the average Queensland household (Delisle, ).
           associated with the conservation and management of du-                                 For example, in St Paul’s c. % of all expenditure is on
           gongs and turtles. For example, commercial trade in these                              food and beverages, compared to % for the average
           species (both of which are listed in Appendix I of CITES,                              Queensland household (ABS, ), which is an indicator
           ) is prohibited. Traditional owners in northern                                    of the financial pressures on the residents of these remote
           Australian coastal indigenous communities have the right                               communities.

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
254         A. Delisle et al.

             Methods                                                                                Paul’s, even though saturation occurred with fewer partici-
                                                                                                    pants there.
             Data collection                                                                           The wording used during free listing sometimes varied
                                                                                                    between individuals. The content of the list and the various
             After obtaining ethical approval from local institutions                               themes elicited were analysed qualitatively for similarity. A
             (Torres Strait Regional Authority and each island’s trad-                              final list was generated, accounting for the similarities be-
             itional owner institution, called a prescribed body corpor-                            tween the ideas of participants and discarding redundan-
             ate), AD travelled to each of the study communities,                                   cies. The final lists of benefits and costs were reviewed
             meeting with leaders to describe the project and discuss                               collectively by the interviewees of each island to check for
             appropriate research methods and associated community                                  accuracy and to develop an agreed set of definitions for
             consultation. The communities requested that we hold regu-                             each item.
             lar community meetings to keep them informed of progress,
             and conduct interviews with a cross-section of individuals
             from each community.                                                                   Identifying groups of benefits and costs
                 During May –December  AD undertook eight                                   We then used cognitive mapping to test for the separability
             field trips, each of – weeks duration, to the two study com-                         (or lack thereof) of the costs and benefits elicited in the
             munities to () elicit the community members’ perceived                                previous step.
             benefits and costs associated with hunting, () understand                                 The  people from each island who had participated in
             how those benefits and costs were related (using cognitive                             the free-listing activities were invited to take part in the cog-
             mapping exercises), and () determine the perceived im-                                nitive mapping exercises, as were additional members of
             portance of each benefit and cost (by asking individuals to                            each community, who were recruited using snowball sam-
             rate them).                                                                            pling, with the goal of speaking to a broad cross-section of
                 Information from () and () was used to identify separ-                           the population.
             able groups of benefits and costs associated with hunting.                                 Each participant was invited to view and categorize indi-
             Information from () and () was used to estimate the aver-                            vidual values (Rosenberg & Kim, ; Coxon, ) via a
             age importance of groups of separable benefits and costs,                              sorting activity using two sets of cards (benefits and
             and mean values were compared. Statistical tests were                                  costs). Each card had a description of one of the items iden-
             used to determine if the differences were significant, so we                           tified from the free-listing exercises. Respondents were
             could determine the relative importance of groups of bene-                             asked to place the cards into groups that ‘went well together’
             fits and costs.                                                                        (ideally, not a single group), and provide a name or label for
                                                                                                    each group of cards. The exercise was performed twice, once
             Eliciting the benefits and costs of traditional hunting                                using cards that related to benefits, and once with cards
                                                                                                    relating to costs.
             We used free listing to identify, via interview, a broad range                             The groups of benefits and costs were coded into separ-
             of benefits and costs associated with hunting. Interviewees                            ate binary matrices. The name of each benefit or cost ap-
             were selected from a list, provided by community represen-                             peared as a header on both the columns and the rows of
             tatives, of people who were deemed knowledgeable (in that                              each matrix. If a respondent had placed two items in a
             they had sufficient knowledge of hunting and of the com-                               group together, then the entry in the cell of the matrix cor-
             munity to provide sound information) and included males                                responding to those two items was ; otherwise it was . We
             and females, young and old. Each interviewee was asked two                             then constructed a single aggregate matrix for each com-
             focal questions: () What are the benefits of traditional                              munity (Mabuiag and St Paul’s); simplistically, the sum of
             dugong and turtle hunting? () What are the costs of                                   all individual matrices. These aggregate matrices were then
             traditional dugong and turtle hunting?                                                 analysed using multidimensional scaling. We used both
                 Responses were recorded in writing, and audio-recorded                             metric (which deals with interval or ratio-level data) and
             if permitted by the participant. At the beginning of each                              non-metric multidimensional scaling (which deals with or-
             interview the participant was shown the list developed in                              dinal data) to obtain visual representations of the relation-
             previous interviews and encouraged to contribute any                                   ships between the numerous benefits and costs identified in
             items that he/she believed should be on it. We stopped con-                            the free-listing exercises, using normalized raw stress scores
             ducting these interviews once saturation was reached (i.e.                             to determine the optimal number of dimensions. With
             no new elements were identified by new interviewees;                                   these visual representations we were able to identify separ-
             Stark & Torrance, ). Saturation occurred after inter-                              able groups of benefits and costs. Following Blake et al.
             viewing  participants (six men and four women) on                                    () we calculated the Euclidean distance between all va-
             Mabuiag Island, and AD decided to interview the same                                   lues in the matrices, for each community, and then calcu-
             number of participants (five women and five men) in St                                 lated Pearson’s R to determine if the observed differences

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
Traditional hunting in Torres Strait                255

           between communities were statistically significant (Blake                              cluster means and cluster relative values were statistically
           et al., ).                                                                         significant.

                                                                                                  Results
           Representativeness of participants

           On Mabuiag Island  residents were asked to participate in                            The benefits and costs of traditional hunting
           the cognitive mapping and  agreed ( men and nine
                                                                                                  Eighteen benefits and  costs were identified through the
           women; % of the permanent adult population of the
                                                                                                  free-listing exercises (Table ). The graphical representa-
           island). In St Paul’s,  residents were asked to participate
                                                                                                  tions of the results of the multidimensional scaling analyses
           and  agreed ( men and  women; % of the permanent
                                                                                                  (Fig. ) helped identify three clusters each of benefits (com-
           adult population). Hunting is a male-only activity in Torres
                                                                                                  munity, family, individual) and costs (community, family,
           Strait. Our sample included male hunters and non-hunters,
                                                                                                  environmental; Table ).
           including elders who no longer hunt but teach the younger
                                                                                                      The typology of the benefit clusters was identical for the
           generation about hunting, and women, who do not hunt but
                                                                                                  two study communities. The two representations of the ben-
           prepare the food products of the hunt. Based on discussion
                                                                                                  efits of hunting were highly correlated (R = ., P = .
           with community members who defined an age cut-off of 
                                                                                                  level); thus we present the combined cognitive map of ben-
           years between younger and older men, our sample included
                                                                                                  efits. All stress values for the multidimensional scaling out-
           a total of  older men (.  years) and  younger men
                                                                                                  puts were acceptable (Kruskal & Wish, ) and indicated
           (#  years). Twenty households ( people) on Mabuiag
                                                                                                  that a three-dimensional solution produced the best fit at
           and  ( people) in St Paul’s ( and % of the total popu-
                                                                                                  both the aggregated and individual levels.
           lation, respectively) were asked to provide information on
                                                                                                      The analyses also identified three distinct clusters for
           hunting patterns. Using this approach we were able to inter-
                                                                                                  costs associated with hunting for Mabuiag respondents,
           view % of all active hunters.
                                                                                                  and four distinct clusters for St Paul’s. The two aggregated
               The demographic composition of the surveyed house-
                                                                                                  representations based on the island of residence were per-
           holds was analysed and compared with the secondary socio-
                                                                                                  fectly correlated (R = ., P = .). As a result, we ana-
           demographic data available from the  census (ABS,
                                                                                                  lysed the cognitive maps of respondents from Mabuiag
           a,b). There were no statistically significant differences
                                                                                                  and St Paul’s combined. When data from all respondents
           (ascertained using one-sample z-tests for population pro-
                                                                                                  were combined, the analyses identified the same three dis-
           portions) between the household composition of the
                                                                                                  tinct clusters defined by the Mabuiag respondents.
           sampled population and the socio-demographic data from
                                                                                                      There were no statistical differences between Mabuiag
           the census (ABS, a,b). Thus we have no reason to be-
                                                                                                  and St Paul’s regarding the relative importance of commu-
           lieve that our sample was not representative of the general
                                                                                                  nity and family benefits (community benefits, P = .;
           population of these communities.
                                                                                                  family benefits, P = .; Mann–Whitney test). The mean
                                                                                                  importance of the community benefits cluster was signifi-
           Estimating the relative value of each group of benefits                                cantly greater than that of family benefits, which in turn
           and costs                                                                              was greater than that of individual benefits, and these differ-
                                                                                                  ences were statistically significant (Fig. a).
           We used the sets of cards that had been provided for the                                   There were no statistically significant differences in the
           sorting session, and asked interviewees to score each item                             importance of cost clusters between communities. The im-
           on a scale from  = not important to  = very important.                              portance of community costs was significantly greater than
           To account for individual differences, scores were normal-                             that of both family and environmental costs. There was no
           ized, so the sum of all the scores given by any single individ-                        significant difference in the importance of family and envir-
           ual equalled .                                                                        onmental costs (Fig. b).
              We then calculated the mean value of each of the separ-                                 The age of male residents was a statistically significant
           able groups of costs and benefits identified in the multidi-                           determinant of the relative importance of a cluster.
           mensional scaling (hereafter clusters, k), and their mean                              Younger men placed more importance on family benefits
           value relative to the other clusters. For each participant:                            (P = .; Mann–Whitney test), whereas older men placed
           mean value of k = sum of individual item values/number                                 more importance on community benefits (P = .;
           of items, and relative value of k = mean value of k/sum of                             Mann–Whitney test). Age had no significant effect on the
           value of all clusters.                                                                 relative importance of individual benefits (P = .;
              For each participant the relative value thus represents the                         Mann–Whitney test). Older men considered community
           proportion of total value captured by each cluster k. A                                costs to be more important than the younger men did
           Wilcoxon test was used to determine if differences between                             (P = .; Mann–Whitney test), whereas younger men

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
256         A. Delisle et al.

             TABLE 1 Benefits and costs of hunting perceived by Torres Strait Islanders from the communities of Mabuiag and St Paul’s (Fig. ), elicited
             during free-listing exercises, grouped into clusters identified through multidimensional scaling. The numbers in parentheses are mean ±
             SD of raw rating scores (range –).

             Benefits                                                                                       Costs
             Community                                                                                      Community
             Keeps tradition (9.12 ± 0.98)                                                                  No respect for cultural protocols (7.94 ± 1.64)
             Keeps culture (9.09 ± 1.17)                                                                    Bad hunting (8.42 ± 1.22)
             Sharing (7.95 ± 1.40)                                                                          Less sharing (7.80 ± 1.54)
             Unity of community (8.24 ± 1.24)                                                               Injuries; i.e. an injured hunter cannot provide to the
                                                                                                            community (4.06 ± 1.69)
             Islan Pasin; i.e.traditional island way of life (7.81 ± 2.01)
             Teaching the children (8.13 ± 1.45)
             Spiritual connection to the sea (6.66 ± 1.72)
             Food for ceremonies (7.60 ± 1.37)
             Shows knowledge of the hunter (6.26 ± 1.54)
             Essence of being an Islander (5.94 ± 2.03)
             Family                                                                                         Family
             Food for home consumption (6.60 ± 1.70)                                                        Fuel (8.08 ± 2.06)
             Fresh food (4.45 ± 1.33)                                                                       Time (7.08 ± 1.74)
             Tasty food (4.02 ± 1.55)                                                                       Pressure for results when in need of food (4.13 ± 1.74)
             Cost-effective practice (6.00 ± 1.80)                                                          Pressure for results when asked to go hunting (3.47 ± 1.82)
             Individual                                                                                     Environmental
             Shows skills of the hunter (4.05 ± 1.55)                                                       Few animals (6.01 ± 1.66)
             Shows strength of the hunter (3.96 ± 1.55)                                                     Cleaning animal waste on the beach (4.72 ± 1.88)
             Prestige (2.90 ± 1.46)                                                                         Disturbance of animals from noise (4.83 ± 1.90)
             Health (3.90 ± 1.16)

             considered family costs to be more important than the older                            & Vitousek, ), and the provision of food for ceremonial
             men did (P = .; Mann–Whitney test). The relative im-                               purposes (Nietschmann, , ; Kwan, ).
             portance of environmental costs was independent of age                                     Our cognitive mapping exercises did not separate clearly
             (P = .; Mann–Whitney test).                                                        market and non-market costs. Fuel and time costs (both
                                                                                                    linked to the market) grouped together with ‘pressure for
             Discussion                                                                             results when in need of food and/or when asked to go hunt-
                                                                                                    ing’ (in a group termed family costs). However, community
             The free-listing exercises confirmed the multidimensional                              costs were deemed to be significantly greater than family
             nature of the benefits and costs of traditional hunting of                             costs, confirming previous observations that socio-cultural
             marine megafauna for two communities in Torres Strait.                                 (community) values (be they costs or benefits) are more im-
             The cognitive mapping exercises demonstrated that trad-                                portant than market values. People are motivated by both ex-
             itional hunting provides bundles of benefits and costs to                              trinsic and intrinsic factors (Gneezy et al., ), and these
             these communities. Community-defined benefits associated                               findings suggest that intrinsic motivations are likely to be
             with traditional hunting in this region are clearly separable                          strongly associated with culture. The important policy impli-
             into one market and two non-market-based clusters (in                                  cation of this finding is that policy makers need to be careful
             terms of benefits to family, community and individuals).                               that extrinsic incentives designed to alter hunting behaviours
                 Family benefits were all related to meat/market values                             do not negatively affect these intrinsic (cultural) motivations.
             and were thus closely associated with provisioning services,                               The valuation of such services (formally, indigenous cul-
             highlighting the importance of food for sustenance and to                              tural services, as defined in the Common International
             indirectly supplement incomes by foregoing the need to                                 Classification of Ecosystem Services; BISE, ) is particu-
             purchase other types of protein (Penny & Moriarty, ;                               larly challenging for three reasons. Not only is the idea of
             Altman, ). Individual benefits encapsulated health ben-                            ‘valuing’ indigenous cultural services contentious and prob-
             efits (Rose, ; Burgess et al., ), but also acknowl-                            ably inappropriate in many contexts (Venn & Quiggin,
             edged that hunting gives men an opportunity to                                         ), but many of these services are inherently inseparable
             demonstrate their skills (Bliege Bird et al., ), which is                          from each other and from other ecosystem services.
             important to their sense of identity. Community benefits in-                           Consequently, one cannot simply estimate the value of
             cluded a broad range of cultural benefits, including, but not                          individual services and sum them (de Groot et al., ;
             limited to, sharing (Wenzel, ; Bliege Bird & Bird, ),                          Carbone & Kerry Smith, ). There are also tenuous or
             the maintenance of culture (Severance et al., ; Vaughan                            non-existent links between most indigenous cultural

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
Traditional hunting in Torres Strait                257

                                                                                                                                            FIG. 2 Multidimensional
                                                                                                                                            scaling representations of the
                                                                                                                                            clusters of benefits (a & b) and
                                                                                                                                            costs (c & d) of hunting, at the
                                                                                                                                            aggregated and individual
                                                                                                                                            levels, for the respondents of
                                                                                                                                            Mabuiag and St Paul’s (Fig. )
                                                                                                                                            combined (N = ). The
                                                                                                                                            clusters of benefits include
                                                                                                                                            community benefits (tr, keeps
                                                                                                                                            tradition; cu, keeps culture; un,
                                                                                                                                            unity of the community; sh,
                                                                                                                                            sharing; pa, Islan Pasin; te,
                                                                                                                                            teaching the children; sp,
                                                                                                                                            spiritual connection to the sea;
                                                                                                                                            ce, food for ceremonies; kn,
                                                                                                                                            shows knowledge of the
                                                                                                                                            hunter; is, essence of being an
                                                                                                                                            Islander), family benefits (co,
                                                                                                                                            food for home consumption;
                                                                                                                                            fr, fresh food; ta, tasty food; ef,
                                                                                                                                            cost-effective), and individual
                                                                                                                                            benefits (sk, shows skills of the
                                                                                                                                            hunter; st, shows strength of
                                                                                                                                            the hunter; pr, prestige; he,
                                                                                                                                            health). The clusters of costs
                                                                                                                                            include community costs
                                                                                                                                            (resp, no respect for cultural
                                                                                                                                            protocols; bhu, bad hunting;
                                                                                                                                            lsh, less sharing; inj, injuries),
                                                                                                                                            family costs (fu, fuel; ti, time;
                                                                                                                                            prne, pressure for results when
                                                                                                                                            in need of food; pras, pressure
                                                                                                                                            for results when asked to go
                                                                                                                                            hunting), and environmental
                                                                                                                                            costs (la, few animals; cl,
                                                                                                                                            cleaning animal waste on the
                                                                                                                                            beach; no, disturbance of
                                                                                                                                            animals from noise).

           services and market prices (Daniel et al., ), requiring the                        population status of dugongs and turtles and the hunting pat-
           use of sophisticated valuation approaches by which infer-                              terns and values of Torres Strait Islanders have not changed
           ences may be drawn about those values. There is a substan-                             (Fuentes et al., ; Marsh et al., ; Cleguer et al., ;
           tive and rapidly growing body of literature on methods for                             Hagihara et al., ; Urwin et al., ; Watkin Lui et al.,
           doing so (Bateman & Great Britain Department for                                       a,b). We have also conducted research on the values of
           Transport, ; Day et al., ) but not all of these meth-                          hunting with the Torres Strait Islander diaspora (Watkin
           ods can be validly applied in all settings. Although simpler                           Lui et al., a,b) with whom c. % of the meat is shared,
           than more accepted approaches to cost–benefit analysis                                 an important cultural practice (Supplementary Material ).
           such as contingent valuation, our methodological approach                                 Nonetheless, the debate over traditional hunting of du-
           facilitates quantification of the cost-effectiveness of various                        gongs and turtles has intensified (Watkin Lui et al.,
           management approaches (Supplementary Material ), using                                b). The Australian government is under increasing
           culturally appropriate participatory methods to address the                            pressure to ban the practice and to offer monetary compen-
           problems outlined above.                                                               sation to the Islanders based on the replacement value of the
                                                                                                  meat. Yielding to these demands would reflect a limited un-
           Further developments                                                                   derstanding of the multidimensional benefits gained by the
                                                                                                  Torres Strait communities involved in traditional hunting.
           Our research group continues to work with the communities                              Not considering the full spectrum of values as assessed by
           and agencies involved and we are confident that the                                    an affected community group can have negative

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
258         A. Delisle et al.

                                                                                                    established by Australian Native Title and environmental
                                                                                                    laws, and the Torres Strait Treaty between Australia and
                                                                                                    Papua New Guinea (Havemann & Smith, ). Thus our
                                                                                                    results contribute to the debate by providing policy makers
                                                                                                    and interested stakeholder groups with a comprehensive un-
                                                                                                    derstanding of the hunting values of Torres Strait Islanders,
                                                                                                    which could be used as a foundation for co-management
                                                                                                    processes for the management of dugong and turtle hunt-
                                                                                                    ing. We have made an initial attempt at estimating a lower
                                                                                                    bound for the monetary value of these values in
                                                                                                    Supplementary Material .

                                                                                                    Conclusion

                                                                                                    The methodology we developed provides insights into types
                                                                                                    of benefits and costs associated with traditional hunting,
                                                                                                    and their relative importance from a community perspec-
                                                                                                    tive. Our approach could be used to develop a typology of
                                                                                                    costs and benefits of related activities in other communities
                                                                                                    that hunt for terrestrial and marine wild meats. The tech-
                                                                                                    nique also made it possible to make various kinds of benefits
                                                                                                    and costs more visible, and to use a quantitative assess-
                                                                                                    ment. Our findings reinforce the call of previous researchers
                                                                                                    (e.g. Gregory et al., ; Turner et al., ) to consider
             FIG. 3 Relative importance scores for clusters of (a) benefits and                     socio-cultural issues when devising natural resource man-
             (b) costs of hunting as perceived by respondents from Mabuiag                          agement strategies. Various groups interested in the sustain-
             and St Paul’s in Torres Strait, Australia (Fig. ). The median is                      able management of wildlife inevitably hold diverse images,
             represented by a horizontal line, the box represents the                               values and worldviews. A comprehensive understanding of
             inter-quartile range, and the whiskers represent the data range.
                                                                                                    the values held by those primarily affected by a manage-
             Box plots that do not share the same letter are derived from
             distributions that are significantly different from each other at                      ment decision can assist stakeholders to work together to
             P , . (Wilcoxon test).                                                             achieve a common goal, and fulfil the requirements of
                                                                                                    co-management promoted by management agencies. The
                                                                                                    approach outlined here is relatively straightforward to im-
             consequences for resource users (invisible losses; Turner                              plement in remote communities and cross-cultural situa-
             et al., ) as well as decision makers, who risk angering                            tions, and could have wide application with indigenous
             people with whom they want to work (Voyer et al., ),                               communities.
             which can lead to regulatory non-compliance, especially
             in remote areas such as Torres Strait.
                 The recognition and integration of cultural values of indi-                        Acknowledgements
             genous hunting into the environmental decision making and
             political discourse is politically difficult but could help foster                     This work was supported by grants from the Marine and
             co-management processes based on institutional fit, from                               Tropical Sciences Research Facility, the Australian Marine
             local to global (Robards & Lovecraft, ). However, a                                Mammal Centre and James Cook University stipend and
             more open dialogue about indigenous hunting risks making                               fee-offset scholarships to AD. We thank the people of
             way for interest groups that disagree with indigenous per-                             Mabuiag and St Paul’s, who welcomed AD into their com-
             spectives (Robards & Lovecraft, ). Indigenous groups                               munity and their homes and made this research possible.
             must prepare for possible conflicts with non-indigenous at-                            The Torres Strait Regional Authority provided valuable
             titudes about wildlife conservation, sustainability and envir-                         logistical support and advice. We also thank two anonym-
             onmental management, while being ready to confront                                     ous reviewers for their valuable comments.
             decisions made at the global or national level by global pol-
             itical environment groups ignorant of the cultural impacts of                          Author contributions
             their decisions (Wenzel, ).
                 Banning the hunting of dugongs and green turtles in                                The study was conceived and conducted as a PhD project by
             Torres Strait would also contravene the hunting rights                                 AD under the supervision of NS and HM. FWL provided

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
Traditional hunting in Torres Strait                       259

           cultural advice from the perspective of an Australian                                           B L I E G E B I R D , R.L., S M I T H , E.A. & B I R D , D.W. () The hunting
           Indigenous researcher. MKK recast the research into an ap-                                         handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behavioral
                                                                                                              Ecology and Sociobiology, , –.
           propriate theoretical background for an Oryx special issue
                                                                                                           B O W E N -J O N E S , E. & P E N D R Y , S. () The threat to primates and
           on cultural values in the context of her work with the                                             other mammals from the bushmeat trade in Africa, and how this
           other members of the research team on associated projects.                                         threat could be diminished. Oryx, , –.
                                                                                                           B R A S H A R E S , J.S., A R C E S E , P., S A M , M.K., C O P P O L I L LO , P.B., S I N C L A I R ,
                                                                                                              A.R.E. & B A L M F O R D , A. () Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines,
           References                                                                                         and fish supply in West Africa. Science, , –.
                                                                                                           B R OW N , S.M. () Cognitive mapping and repertory grids for
           ABS (a) Mabuiag (IC) (IARE ), Indigenous Profile.                                         qualitative survey research: some comparative observations. Journal
              Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia. Http://www.                               of Management Studies, , –.
              censusdata.abs.gov.au/ABSNavigation/prenav/ProductSearch?                                    B U R G E S S , C.P., J O H N S T O N , F.H., B E R R Y , H.L., M C D O N N E L L , J.,
              &areacode=IARE&producttype=CommunityProfiles&                                              Y I B A R B U K , D., G U N A B A R R A , C. et al. () Healthy country,
              action= [accessed  April ].                                                            healthy people: the relationship between Indigenous health
           ABS (b) St Pauls (IC) (IARE ), Indigenous Profile. Australian                             status and “caring for country”. Medical Journal of Australia, ,
              Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia. Http://www.censusdata.                               –.
              abs.gov.au/ABSNavigation/prenav/ProductSearch?&areacode=                                     B U R N S I LV E R , S., M A G D A N Z , J., S T O T T S , R., B E R M A N , M. & K O F I N A S ,
              IARE&producttype=CommunityProfiles&action=                                              G. () Are mixed economies persistent or transitional? Evidence
              [accessed  April ].                                                                       using social networks from Arctic Alaska. American Anthropologist,
           ABS () Census of Population and Housing—Counts of Aboriginal                                   , –.
              and Torres Strait Islander Australians. Catalogue Number ..                             BUTLER, J.R.A., T AWA K E , A., S K E W E S , T., T AWA K E , L. & M C G R AT H , V.
              Http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/.main                                       () Integrating traditional ecological knowledge and fisheries
              +features [accessed  November ].                                                      management in the Torres Strait, Australia: the catalytic role of
           A D A M OW I C Z , W.L., B O X A L L , P., W I L L I A M S , M. & L O U V I E R E , J. ()      turtles and dugong as cultural keystone species. Ecology and Society,
              Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values:                                  , , http://dx.doi.org/./ES--.
              choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of                             C A R B O N E , J.C. & K E R R Y S M I T H , V. () Valuing nature in a general
              Agricultural Economics, , –.                                                              equilibrium. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
           A L L E B O N E -W E B B , S.M., K Ü M P E L , N.F., R I S T , J., C O W L I S H AW , G.,          , –.
              R O W C L I F F E , J.M. & M I L N E R -G U L L A N D , E.J. () Use of market            C A R L E Y , K. & P A L M Q U I S T , M. () Extracting, representing, and
              data to assess bushmeat hunting sustainability in Equatorial Guinea.                            analyzing mental models. Social Forces, , –.
              Conservation Biology, , –.                                                           C H A N , K.M.A., G U E R R Y , A.D., B A LVA N E R A , P., K L A I N , S.,
           A LT M A N , J.C. () Hunter-Gatherers Today: An Aboriginal Economy                             S A T T E R F I E L D , T., B A S U R T O , X. et al. (a) Where are cultural and
              in North Australia. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies,                                 social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive
              Canberra, Australia.                                                                            engagement. BioScience, , –.
           A X E L R O D , R. () Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of                          C H A N , K.M.A., S AT T E R F I E L D , T. & G O L D S T E I N , J. (b) Rethinking
              Political Elites. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.                                   ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values.
           B A G G I O , J.A., B U R N S I LV E R , S.B., A R E N A S , A., M A G D A N Z , J.S.,             Ecological Economics, , –.
              K O F I N A S , G.P. & D E D O M E N I C O , M. () Multiplex social                      CITES () Convention on International Trade in Endangered
              ecological network analysis reveals how social changes affect                                   Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Appendices I, II and III. Http://
              community robustness more than resource depletion. Proceedings of                               cites.org/eng/app/appendices.php [accessed  September ].
              the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ,                       CLEGUER, C., P R E S T O N , S., H A G I H A R A , R., S H I M A D A , T., U DY AW E R , V.,
              –.                                                                                    H A M A N N , M. et al. () Working with the Community to
           B A S S E T T , T.J. () Card-carrying hunters, rural poverty, and wildlife                     Understand the Use of Space by Dugongs and Green Turtles in Torres
              decline in northern Côte d’Ivoire. The Geographical Journal, , –                           Strait: A Project in Collaboration with the Mura Badulgal Registered
              .                                                                                             Native Title Bodies Corporate. Report to the National
           B AT E M A N , I.J. & G R E AT B R I T A I N D E P A R T M E N T F O R T R A N S P O R T           Environmental Science Program, Reef and Rainforest Research
              () Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A                                  Centre Limited, Cairns, Australia.
              Manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.                                                        C O C K S , M., L Ó P E Z , C. & D O L D , T. () Cultural importance of
           B É L A I R , C., I C H I K AWA , K., W O N G , B.Y.L. & M U LO N G O Y , K.J. (eds)               non-timber forest products: opportunities they pose for bio-cultural
              () Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity in Socio-ecological                              diversity in dynamic societies. In Non-Timber Forest Products in the
              Production Landscapes. Background to the ‘Satoyama Initiative for                               Global Context (eds S. Shackleton, C. Shackleton & P. Shanley), pp.
              the Benefit of Biodiversity and Human Well-being’. Secretariat of the                           –. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
              Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.                                        C O X O N , A.P.M. () Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis. Sage
           BISE () Common International Classification of Ecosystem                                       Publications, Thousand Oaks, USA.
              Services (CICES) v. .. Http://biodiversity.europa.eu/maes/                                 C R O O K E S , D.J. & M I L N E R -G U L L A N D , E.J. () Wildlife and
              common-international-classification-of-ecosystem-services-                                      economic policies affecting the bushmeat trade: a framework for
              cices-classification-version-. [accessed  January ].                                    analysis. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, , –.
           B L A K E , B.F., S C H U L Z E , S. & H U G H E S , J.M. () Perceptual Mapping             C R O U C H , J.B., M C N I V E N , I.J., D AV I D , B., R O W E , C. & W E I S L E R , M.
              by Multidimensional Scaling: A Step by Step Primer. Cleveland State                             () Berberass: marine resource specialisation and environmental
              University, Cleveland, USA.                                                                     change in Torres Strait during the past  years. Archaeology in
           B L I E G E B I R D , R.L. & B I R D , D.W. () Delayed reciprocity and                         Oceania, , –.
              tolerated theft: the behavioral ecology of food-sharing strategies.                          D A N I E L , T.C., M U H A R , A., A R N B E R G E R , A., A Z N A R , O., B O Y D , J.W.,
              Current Anthropology, , –.                                                                C H A N , K.M.A et al. () Contributions of cultural services to the

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
260         A. Delisle et al.

                 ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of                                L I M P U S , C.J. () A Biological Review of Australian Marine Turtle
                 Sciences of the United States of America, , –.                                            Species. . Green Turtle, Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus). Queensland
             D AY , B., B AT E M A N , I.J., C A R S O N , R.T., D U P O N T , D., L O U V I E R E , J.J.,            Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane, Australia.
                 M O R I M OT O , S. et al. () Ordering effects and choice set                                L I M P U S , C.J. & P A R M E N T E R , C.J. () The sea turtle resource of the
                 awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies. Journal of                                   Torres Strait region. In Torres Strait Fisheries Seminar (eds A.
                 Environmental Economics and Management, , –.                                                   K. Haines, G.C. Williams & D. Coates), pp. –. Australian
             D E G R O O T , R.S., W I L S O N , M.A. & B O U M A N S , R.M.J. () A                               Publishing Services, Canberra, Australia.
                 typology for the classification, description and valuation of                                    M A R S H , H., G R AY S O N , J., G R E C H , A., H A G I H A R A , R. & S O B T Z I C K , S.
                 ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, ,                                   () Re-evaluation of the sustainability of a marine mammal
                 –.                                                                                             harvest by indigenous people using several lines of evidence.
             D E L I S L E , A. () A socio-economic investigation of the Torres Strait                            Biological Conservation, , –.
                 Indigenous dugong and turtle fisheries. PhD thesis. James Cook                                   M A R S H , H., G R E C H , A. & H A G I H A R A , R. (a) Aerial Survey of
                 University, Townsville, Australia.                                                                   Torres Strait to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Enforced and Possibly
             D U F F Y , R., S T J O H N , F.A.V., B Ü S C H E R , B. & B R O C K I N G T O N , D. ()             Extended Dugong Sanctuary as One of the Tools for Managing the
                 Toward a new understanding of the links between poverty and                                          Dugong Fishery. James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
                 illegal wildlife hunting. Conservation Biology, , –.                                       M A R S H , H., O’S H E A , T.J. & R E Y N O L D S , J.E. (b) Ecology and
             F I O L , C.M. & H U F F , A.S. () Maps for managers: Where are we?                                  Conservation of the Sirenia: Dugongs and Manatees. Cambridge
                 Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies, ,                                         University Press, Cambridge, UK.
                 –.                                                                                         M C N I V E N , I.J. () Navigating the human–animal divide: marine
             F I T Z P AT R I C K -N I E T S C H M A N N , J. () Another way of dying:                            mammal hunters and rituals of sensory allurement. World
                 the social and cultural context of death in a Melanesian community,                                  Archaeology, , –.
                 Torres Strait. PhD thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.                               M E N D O Z A , G.A. & P R A B H U , R. () Qualitative multi-criteria
             F U E N T E S , M.M.P.B., B E L L , I., H A G I H A R A , R., H A M A N N , M., H A Z E L , J.,          approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource
                 H U T H , A. et al. () Improving in-water estimates of marine turtle                             management. Forest Ecology and Management, , –.
                 abundance by adjusting aerial survey counts for perception and                                   M I L L E N N I U M E C O S Y S T E M A S S E S S M E N T () Ecosystems and
                 availability biases. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and                                      Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
                 Ecology, , –.                                                                             M O M T A Z , S. & G L A D S T O N E , W. () Ban on commercial fishing in
             G N E E Z Y , U., M E I E R , S. & R E Y -B I E L , P. () When and why                               the estuarine waters of New South Wales, Australia: community
                 incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. Journal of Economic                                      consultation and social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment
                 Perspectives, , –.                                                                           Review, , –.
             G R E G O R Y , R., F A I L I N G , L. & H A R S T O N E , M. () Meaningful                      M O S I M A N E , A.W., M C C O O L , S., B R O W N , P. & I N G R E B R E T S O N , J.
                 resource consultations with First Peoples: notes from British                                        () Using mental models in the analysis of human–wildlife
                 Columbia. Environment, , –.                                                                    conflict from the perspective of a social–ecological system in
             H A D D O N , A.C. () Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological                                       Namibia. Oryx, , –.
                 Expedition to Torres Strait. Cambridge University Press,                                         N A S I , R., B R O W N , D., W I L K I E , D., B E N N E T T , E., T U T I N , C., VA N T O L ,
                 Cambridge, UK.                                                                                       G. & C H R I S T O P H E R S E N , T. () Conservation and Use of
             H A G I H A R A , R., C L E G U E R , C., P R E S T O N , S., S O B T Z I C K , S., H A M A N N ,        Wildlife-Based Resources: The Bushmeat Crisis. Secretariat of the
                 M., S H I M A D A , T. & M A R S H , H. () Improving the Estimates of                            Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada, and Center
                 Abundance of Dugongs and Large Immature and Adult-Sized Green                                        for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
                 Turtles in Western and Central Torres Strait. Report to the National                             N I E T S C H M A N N , B.Q. () Good dugong, bad dugong; good turtle,
                 Environmental Science Programme, Reef and Rainforest Research                                        bad turtle. Natural History, , –.
                 Centre Limited, Cairns, Australia.                                                               N I E T S C H M A N N , B.Q. () Hunting and ecology of dugongs and
             H AV E M A N N , P. & S M I T H , R. () Current Legislation and Policy                               green turtles in Torres Strait. National Geographic Society Research
                 Conducive to Sustainable Community Management of Dugong and                                          Reports, , –.
                 Turtle Traditional Fisheries in the Torres Strait. James Cook                                    N Y A K I , A., G R AY , S.A., L E P C Z Y K , C.A., S K I B I N S , J.C. & R E N T S C H , D.
                 University, Townsville, Australia.                                                                   () Local-scale dynamics and local drivers of bushmeat trade.
             H O B B S , B.F., L U D S I N , S.A., K N I G H T , R.L., R Y A N , P.A., B I B E R H O F E R , J.       Conservation Biology, , –.
                 & C I B O R O W S K I , J.J.H. () Fuzzy cognitive mapping as a tool to                       OESR (O F F I C E O F E C O N O M I C A N D S T AT I S T I C A L R E S E A R C H ) ()
                 define management objectives for complex ecosystems. Ecological                                      Indigenous Regional Profiles Census . Http://www.oesr.qld.gov.
                 Applications, , –.                                                                         au/regions/fitzroy/profiles/indigenous-reg-profiles-c/index.php
             I N U I T C I R C U M P O L A R C O U N C I L -A L A S K A () Alaskan Inuit Food                     [accessed  January ].
                 Security Conceptual Framework: How to Assess the Arctic from an                                  Ö Z E S M I , S.L. & Ö Z E S M I , U. () An artificial neural network
                 Inuit Perspective. Technical Report. Inuit Circumpolar Council-                                      approach to spatial habitat modelling with interspecific interaction.
                 Alaska, Anchorage, USA.                                                                              Ecological Modelling, , –.
             K A L L A N D , A. () Unveiling the Whale: Discourses on Whales and                              Ö Z E S M I , S.L. & Ö Z E S M I , U. () A participatory approach to
                 Whaling. Berghahn Books, New York, USA.                                                              ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder
             K R U S K A L , J.B. & W I S H , M. () Multidimensional Scaling. Sage                                group analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environmental
                 Publications, Newbury Park, USA.                                                                     Management, , –.
             K WA N , D. () Towards a sustainable indigenous fishery for dugongs                              P E N N Y , D.H. & M O R I A R T Y , J. () The Aboriginal economy—then
                 in Torres Strait: a contribution of empirical data analysis and process.                             and now. In The Nutrition of Aborigines in Relation to the Ecosystem
                 PhD thesis. James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.                                            of Central Australia (eds B.S. Hetze & H.J. Frith), pp. –. CSIRO
             K WA N , D., M A R S H , H. & D E L E A N , S. () Factors influencing the                            Publishing Services, Adelaide, Australia.
                 sustainability of customary dugong hunting by a remote indigenous                                P E T E R S O N , N. () On the persistence of sharing: personhood,
                 community. Environmental Conservation, , –.                                                  asymmetrical reciprocity, and demand sharing in the Indigenous

                                                                                                       Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 250–261 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605317001466
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 11 Feb 2021 at 04:42:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605317001466
You can also read