Spy on Me #2 Artistic Manoeuvres for - the Digital Present 19.-29.3.2020
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Spy on Me #2 Artistic Manoeuvres for the Digital Present 19.–29.3.2020
Spy on Me #2 – Artistic Manoeuvres for the Digital Present 19.–29.3.2020 / HAU1, HAU2, HAU3 We have arrived in the reality of digital transformation. Life with screens, apps and algorithms influences our behaviour, our atten- tion and desires. Meanwhile the idea of the public space and of democracy is being reorganized by digital means. The festival “Spy on Me” goes into its second round after 2018, searching for manoeuvres for the digital present together with Berlin-based and international artists. Performances, interactive spatial installati- ons and discursive events examine the complex effects of the digi- tal transformation of society. In theatre, where live encounters are the focus, we come close to the intermediate spaces of digital life, searching for ways out of feeling powerless and overwhelmed, as currently experienced by many users of internet-based technolo- gies. For it is not just in some future digital utopia, but here, in the midst of this present, that we have to deal with the basic conditi- ons of living together as a society and of planetary survival. Are we at the edge of a great digital darkness or at the decisive tur- ning point of perspective? A Festival by HAU Hebbel am Ufer. Funded by: Hauptstadtkulturfonds.
What is
our rela-
tionship
with alien
conscious-
nesses?
As we build rivals to human intelligence, James Bridle
looks at our relationship with the planet’s other alien
consciousnesses.
5
On 27 June 1835, two masters of the ancient DeepBlue defeated Garry Kasparov at chess, prise, strangeness and even horror that
Chinese game of Go faced off in a match up to that point a game with Go-like status as AlphaGo evokes will become a feature of more
which was the culmination of a years-long a bastion of human imagination and mental and more areas of our lives.
rivalry. The young prodigy Akaboshi Intetsu superiority. But compared to AlphaGo, Deep-
dominated the game early on using a secret Blue might as well have belonged to the The increasing complexity of the world around
move developed by his teachers. But a day steam age; immensely powerful, IBM’s ma- us should be cause for political and social con-
into the contest a number of chine lacked anything we cern, as intelligent but unknowable software
ghosts appeared to his oppo- We have to would call intelligence. It works its way through society. But it’s also an
nent, Hon’inbo ¯ Jo ¯ wa, and contend with brute-forced Kasparov off opportunity to rethink our relationship with
showed him three critical inscrutable the board, calculating games the wider world, and to reconsider our place
moves with which he was many moves ahead – but in it. It seems significant that we are investing
decisions made
able to win back control of merely that: calculating. so much time and energy in building these toy
the game. At the point when about jobs and AlphaGo and its kind perform versions of our own minds, just as our ability
it became clear that Aka- finances, health- something more akin to ima- to control our own destiny and live on the pla-
boshi would not be able to care and road gination and intuition, and net sustainably appears to be failing. That fai-
win the game, the young safety. moreover they do so in lure is in part one of hubris: the belief that we
challenger violently coughed mathematical realms the can, as the planet’s dominant species, conti-
up blood onto the board. He human mind cannot compre- nue to act selfishly, wastefully and without
was found dead a few days later. The match hend. While we can follow DeepBlue’s line of regard to the future. But with AI comes the
between Akaboshi and Jo ¯ wa has passed thought, the thinking behind AlphaGo’s deci- sense that we might not be the dominant
into Go lore as the ‘blood-vomiting game’, and sions remain unknowable to us – and hence actor for much longer – and an attendant
subsequent historians have attributed Aka- alien and otherworldly. opportunity to really consider what it means
boshi’s decline to an undiagnosed pulmonary to share the world with other, barely knowable
disease. They have been less forthcoming, To call AlphaGo and systems like it an Artificial intelligences.
however, on the matter of ghosts, which may Intelligence is in some ways an exaggeration.
still haunt the game to this day. It is a very narrow form of in- Because of course, we’ve
telligence directed at a parti- With AI comes the shared the universe with
On 29 December 2016, a new player appeared cular task, based on one par- other intelligences for a long
sense that we
on Tygem, a popular online Go server on which ticular computational confi- time, and we’ve handled the
might not be the
many senior Go professionals trained and tes- guration – neural networks – situation pretty badly. We
ted out new moves. The player was called and a technique called rein- dominant actor for have consistently downgra-
Master, and immediately they began a blazing forcement learning. These are much longer – and ded or reclassified forms of
winning streak: sixty victories in just seven pieces of software modelled an attendant oppor- intelligence that do not
days, and barely resting between games. loosely on parts of the human tunity to really resemble our own narrow
Many of the victories were over world cham- brain, which are trained on a consider what it definition, and as a result felt
pion players. Master’s moves often seemed reward system which encou- means to share the free to treat their possessors
wild, even impetuous, but they always resul- rages them to develop their as lesser creatures, lower
world with other,
ted in a win. After the fifty-ninth game Master own strategies. Despite this orders of beings, or not really
was revealed to be – as had been suspected – narrow focus, the benefits
barely knowable as things at all. To ignore,
not a human player, but an Artificial Intelli- are generalisable; as well as intelligences. consume, despoil and poison
gence. Master was the latest iteration of Deep- learning other games, the them, both to their detriment
Mind and Google’s AlphaGo programme, which techniques developed for and in the final, devastating,
had gained worldwide attention when it AlphaGo have been deployed by Google in analysis, to our own.
defeated Go master Lee Sedol six months ear- everything from medical diagnoses to You-
lier. Tube recommendations. And yet the last few decades have also seen
the slow murmurings of recognition of other
That game had been clse, but the New Year 'With AI comes the sense that we might not ways of thinking and being in the world, which
games were already markedly different. When be the dominant actor for much longer ...' appears to us as a sudden flowering of forms
Go players tried to describe the AI’s style of of intelligence which differ radically from our
play, they struggled to reconcile it with any- Machine learning is being used by others to own. More and more species are being admit-
thing known. One leading Go player said, screen applicants for jobs, pilot self-driving ted, grudgingly, to the community of those
‘they’re how I imagine games from far in the cars and target military drones. Neural net- that really think, from orangutans to ele-
future’. Another reported feeling that an ‘alien works are live and connected to the stock phants, both of which have recently been
intelligence’ had landed among them. The market, to distribution systems, to transport granted legal personhood in court cases. As
machine’s own creator, Demis Hassabis, said infrastructure – to the very social, material, we recognise the differing forms of intelli-
its moves seemed to emanate ‘from another and economic bases of our daily existence. It’s gence present in both AI and other species,
dimension’. not just AlphaGo’s ‘god-like’ moves we have the business of assigning rankings to other
to contend with, but inscrutable decisions creatures begins to seem as stupid and vio-
The last great revolution in human-machine made about jobs and finances, healthcare and lent as assigning them to different races. This
competition occurred in 1997, when IBM’s road safety – and the sense of mystery, sur- too is only the beginning of what we might
6
recognise, only the beginning of another outnumber our own cells ten to one, has been strangeness of mere toy intelligences begins
strangeness, if we choose to see intelligence shown to have measurable effects on our to pale.
as something that belongs not only to cognition.
humans, and not only inside the human head. For a long time we have been as unheeding of
'The centrality of human intelligence is on these intelligences as we have been deaf to
Octopuses in aquaria are now known to the point of being knocked violently aside the frequency of electrons, and blind to the
recognise individual humans, and to prefer by our own inventions...' ultraviolet light that soaks the plants around
some to others, squirting water at those they us. But they have been here all along, and are
dislike. Disliking brightness, At the other end of the scale, becoming undeniable, just as the capacities of
they squirt water at light the largest organism in the our own technologies threaten to supersede
We find ourselves
bulbs above their tanks to world is a forest in Colorado, us. After wilfully ignoring the intelligences of
standing upon
extinguish them too: they are a hundred-acre expanse of others for so long, the centrality of human
not merely aware of their a ruined planet, cloned aspen sharing a sin- intelligence is on the point of being knocked
environment, but seek to not smart enough gle, 80,000 year-old intercon- violently aside by our own inventions. A new
manipulate it. But octopuses, to save ourselves, nected root system. And like Copernican trauma looms, wherein we find
unlike apes and elephants, and no longer by all forests it feels, processes, ourselves standing upon a ruined planet, not
are also distinctly alien crea- any stretch of the and communicates. Recent smart enough to save ourselves, and no lon-
tures, separated from the imagination the scholarship has revealed the ger by any stretch of the imagination the
mammals by millions of years social relationships and col- smartest ones around. Any appeal to survival
smartest ones
of evolution, with networks lective intelligence of trees, will have to be made both to technology and
of neurons distributed
around. which share resources, form other non-human intelligences, and it will be
throughout their entire alliances, and recognise dis- possible only if we are prepared to accept the
bodies. And perhaps ours tress in others, sending both toy intelligences we’re building not as yet
too: the health and diversity of the human aid and warnings through tap roots and phe- more indications of our own superiority, but as
microbiome, the 2kg of other species we carry romone clouds, much in the way that insect intimations of our ultimate interdependence,
around with us – mostly in the gut – and which colonies do. Under such circumstances, the and as calls to humility and care.
About James Bridle
James Bridle is an artist and writer working across technologies and disciplines. His artworks have been commissioned by galleries and
institutions and exhibited worldwide and on the internet. His writing on literature, culture and networks has appeared in magazines and
newspapers including Wired, Domus, Cabinet, the Atlantic, the New Statesman, the Guardian, the Observer and many others, in print and
online. New Dark Age, his book about technology, knowledge, and the end of the future, was published by Verso (UK & US) in 2018.
Essay originally commissioned by Barbican Centre as part of their 2019 season Life Rewired.
8
Die Funkmasten auf vielen Berliner Häusern sollen z.B. für einen flächendeckend stabilen Handyempfang und schnelles mobiles Internet sorgen.
In the imagination of the techno-utopians of surveillance, we find that marginalised But building systems that are better in terms
New tech-
the 1990s, the internet would create a bodi- groups and those who were discriminated of parity will not necessarily lead to greater
less space – a space that was both equalising against were often watched more closely justice or to less discrimination. Let us return
and equally accessible to all. “We are creating than others. In 18th century New York City, for to the example of facial recognition. In his
a world that all may enter without privilege or example, the so-called lantern laws obliged essay “Against Black Inclusion in Facial
prejudice accorded by race, black, mixed-race and indige- Recognition”, software developer Nabil Has-
economic power, military As of October nous enslaved people to sein states: “I have no reason to support the
force, or station of birth,” 2019, more than carry candle lanterns with development or deployment of technology
proclaimed John Perry Bar- them when they walked which makes it easier for the state to recog-
half of the world’s
nologies,
low in his 1996 manifesto A about the city after sunset nise and surveil members of my community.”
Declaration of the Indepen- population – alone without a white per- His point alerts us to the fact that discrimina-
dence of Cyberspace. Back a staggering 4.48 son. Marginalised communi- tion and bias do not only happen while a
in those early days of cyber- billion people – ties have also always been technology is used— they also happen before
libertarian fantasy, much less are online. of special interest to the and after its use. Systemic injustices as well
was said about what would surveillance apparatus: the as individuals’ views and assumptions influ-
happen once you were so-called Rosa Listen were ence which products and services are
online, or how exactly people from around used by police departments in Germany even designed and built, who builds them, how
Old Dis-
the world with different economic means after homosexuality was decriminalised in they are used and how their results are inter-
would get online in the first place. 1969; while over in the U.S. the first Director preted and applied. As the historian Melvin
of the FBI J. Edgar Hoover had the bureau Kranzberg proclaimed in 1985 already: “tech-
As of October 2019, more than half of the keep extensive dossiers on social movements nology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neu-
world’s population – a staggering 4.48 billion and political dissidents. tral.”
people – are online. For many of these people,
access to online spaces was made possible But with new technologies, old inequalities Both low-cost smartphones and facial recog-
by cheap smartphones that bring low-cost are reappearing in novel and unexpected nition systems are examples of how harms
crimination
internet to emerging markets. But inexpen- forms. A good example of this is facial recog- amplified by technologies tend to dispropor-
sive technologies often entail hidden costs. nition. Most facial recognition systems still tionately affect those who are already
Many cheap phones get shipped with poor perform best at recognising the faces of marginalised. As such, technology policy is
security and some even harvest people’s data white men. Joy Buolamwini, a researcher from tightly intertwined with social and global jus-
by design and by default. For instance, in the MIT Media Lab tested commercially tice issues – and it should be recognised as
2018 the Wall Street Journal reported that a released facial-analysis made by Microsoft, such on a policy level. Yet, there has been a
popular smartphone sold in Myanmar and IBM, and the Chinese company Face+++, and strange tendency to treat the tech industry
Cambodia, the Chinese-made Singtech P10, found that all systems were very good at as fundamentally different to other sectors. It
comes with a pre-loaded app that cannot be identifying the gender of lighter-skinned men. would never occur to us to regulate pharma-
deleted and that sends the owner’s live loca- However, darker-skinned men were misclas- ceutical companies through non-binding and
The utopia of cyber freedom is showing its darker side tion to an advertising firm in Taiwan. The hid- sified six per cent of the time unenforceable ethical guide-
den cost, therefore, is often access to peo- and darker-skinned women In an increasingly lines. We do not expect oil
more and more clearly. Because the data that every- ple’s data. as often as 30.3 per cent of
the time. In high-stakes areas
automated world companies to self-regulate
when it comes to complying
where everything is
one generates every day is used in very different ways We are living in a world where almost every- such as law enforcement,
thing we do automatically generates data, misidentification could impli-
turned into data, to environmental protection.
And in hardly any sector do
what is at stake is
- depending, for example, on where you live and how whether we are going somewhere, meeting cate people in crimes they
someone, purchasing something or simply did not commit. But even in the distribution of
we place the same amount
of the burden of responsibil-
wasting time. Even aspects of human life that seemingly mundane environ- power between ity on individuals to protect
much money you have at your disposal. Technological were formerly unsurveyed and unquantified ments – such as football sta- people, the market themselves. When we go to
are now turned into data points that are col- diums or concert halls – and the state. restaurants or buy food at
progress is thus taking place on the backs of people lected, aggregated and collated. We are all surveillance is both Orwellian
data, as John Cheney-Lippold has said, but and Kafkaesque, as auto-
the supermarkets, we do not
come equipped with food-
who are marginalised due to discrimination and fewer this ‘we’ is not a uniform entity; it is charac- mated misidentification shifts the burden of safety testing kits – we trust that what we
terised by both marginalising and privileging proof on the falsely recognised individuals, buy is safe.
privileges. Frederike Kaltheuner and Nele Ober- differences. One way in which this manifests who suddenly find themselves needing to
itself is that data exploitation is often baked prove that they are who they say they are Privacy creates the safe space within which
into the infrastructures and technologies that and not whom a system says they are. we are not judged, assessed or categorised.
müller explain the damage that technologies can do are disproportionately sold to those who are It is the space in which we can develop our
more likely to be adversely affected by its Recently, awareness for bias baked into the identity, change who we are and decide who
in their essay. abuse: poorer people, and those who are new design of technology has been increasing we want to become. But what is at stake is
to the internet. Another manifestation is how and for the past two years, fixing in-built dis- more than individual privacy. In an increas-
surveillance systems are designed and crimination has become a key priority for ingly automated world where everything is
deployed. If we look back at the history of technology companies and researchers alike. turned into data, what is at stake is the dis-
10 11
tribution of power between people, the mar- can be used, for instance, do much more than collectively. Instead of pitting regulation
ket and the state. That’s why perhaps one of simply protect people’s data: they also miti- against innovation, we should perhaps ask
the most pressing tasks of this decade - next gate some of the informational asymmetries ourselves what kind of innovation and
to the climate crisis and that exist between people progress we as a society and as individual
growing inequality - is to vig- We should perhaps and the technologies they voters really want: innovation that benefits
orously defend our rights, as ask ourselves what rely on. the few, or that benefits the many? Do we
well as the norms and rules kind of innovation want progress toward a world in which
that should govern powerful Binding laws and regulations democracy and human rights can flourish, or
and progress we as
technologies, the companies are often cast as a threat to progress toward a world in which they are
a society and as
that build them and the gov- technological progress and under increasing duress? There are many truly
ernments that deploy them. individual voters innovation. Indeed, if exciting and ground-breaking possibilities
Governments – especially really want: innova- progress is taken to mean that emerging technologies can enable. It is
democratic ones – need to tion that benefits “moving fast and breaking up to us to ensure that we are creating the
resist the temptation to the few, or that things”, as one of Facebook’s right conditions for a better world to be pos-
undermine civil liberties in benefits the many? early mottos declared, then sible.
the name of safety and secu- they most definitely would.
rity. When it comes to But if the tech scandals of
empowering individuals vis a vis technology the past three years have taught us anything,
companies, the clearest way is through laws it is that breaking things comes with collateral
and regulations. Rules that govern how data damage, the price of which we have to pay
Frederike Kaltheuner is a civil rights activist and works as a writer in London. Until 2019 she was head of the data abuse department of the
international civil rights organisation Privacy International, based in London. Since 2019 she has been a Tech Policy Fellow of the Mozilla
Foundation. She studied Internet Science in Oxford and Philosophy, Politics and Economics in Maastricht and Istanbul. As an expert witness,
she has testified at hearings in the British and European Parliament on topics such as artificial intelligence and data ethics. As an expert on
new technologies, Kaltheuner is a regular guest on numerous television formats, including "BBCNews" and "AlJazeera".
Nele Obermüller is an author and freelance journalist. She works in German and English. Her articles have appeared on Deutsche Welle, The
Guardian, Food & and Vice, among others, and she has written for the UNHCR and the European Commission. Obermüller studied Criminology
in Cambridge and Psychology, Philosophy and Cultural Studies in Sussex and Berlin. She has received several awards for her journalistic
work, including the Guardian International Development Journalism Award. She lives in Berlin.
An earlier version of this text was published in German language in the book "Datengerechtigkeit" by Frederike Kaltheuner and Nele Obermül-
ler (Nicolai Publishing & Intelligence GmbH, Berlin 2018).
12
Do 19.3. Mo 23.3. Sa 28.3.
18:00 / HAU2 19:00 / HAU1 18:00–22 :00 / Houseclub
Festivaleröffnung Making Sense of the Digital Society doublelucky productions
18:30 / HAU2 Justice in the Datafield Society Garden of Tangled Data
Mit Lina Dencik INSTALLATION, DIALOG / Englisch und Deutsch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit möglich /
Other Intelligences Kategorie F
Im Anschluss: Gespräch mit Jonas Staal
Mit James Bridle / Moderation: Annemie Vanackere 19:00 / HAU3
DIALOG / Englisch mit deutscher Simultanübersetzung / Kategorie E Moderation: Tobi Müller
20:30 / HAU1 / Vorpremiere
DIALOG / Englisch mit deutscher Simultanübersetzung / Eintritt frei Kat Válastur / HAU
(Anmeldung bis 22.3. unter hiig.de/digitalsociety)
Rasp Your Soul
STO Union & Carte Blanche TANZ / Englisch (Sprache kein Problem) / Kategorie C
P.O.R.N. (Portrait of Restless Narcissism)
THEATER / Englisch / Kategorie C
Mi 25.3. 20:30 / HAU2
Mette Ingvartsen
Moving in Concert
18:00–22:00 / HAU3 Houseclub / Premiere
Fr 20.3. doublelucky productions
Garden of Tangled Data
TANZ / Kategorie C
22:00 / HAU2
18:00–22:00 / HAU3 / Premiere INSTALLATION, DIALOG / Deutsch und Englisch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit Gudrun Gut
NewfrontEars & Oozing Gloop möglich / Kategorie F Konzert / Einlass: 21:30
FEEEEEEEED Im Anschluss: Vladimir Ivkovic (DJ-Set)
MUSIK / Kategorie D
INSTALLATION, PERFORMANCE / Englisch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit möglich / Kategorie F
19:00–00:00 / HAU2 Do 26.3.
dgtl fmnsm
HOT MESS / Live-Online-Performance #1
PERFORMANCE, DIALOG / Englisch und Deutsch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit möglich / Kategorie F
18:00 / HAU3
Houseclub präsentiert:
So 29.3.
15:00–19:00 / Houseclub
20:00 / HAU1 Kareth Schaffer
Emojiland! doublelucky productions
STO Union & Carte Blanche Garden of Tangled Data
PERFORMANCE / Deutsch / Eintritt frei
P.O.R.N. (Portrait of Restless Narcissism) INSTALLATION, DIALOG / Englisch und Deutsch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit möglich /
THEATER / Englisch / Kategorie C 18:00–22:00 / Houseclub Kategorie F
doublelucky productions 17:00 / HAU2
Sa 21.3. Garden of Tangled Data
INSTALLATION, DIALOG / Deutsch und Englisch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit
möglich / Kategorie F
Mette Ingvartsen
Moving in Concert
TANZ / Kategorie C (inkl. “Burning Futures”)
13:00–18:00 / HAU2 19:00 / HAU3 / Wiederaufnahme 19:00 / HAU2
dgtl fmnsm Kat Válastur / HAU Burning Futures:
HOT MESS / Workspace: Center for Speculation Rasp Your Soul
DIALOG / Englisch und Deutsch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit möglich / Eintritt frei TANZ / Englisch (Sprache kein Problem) / Kategorie C On Ecologies of Existence
18:00–23:00 / HAU3 #3 On Techno-Organic Bodies and
20:00 / HAU1 / Premiere
Planetary Politics
NewfrontEars & Oozing Gloop Jonas Staal & Jan Fermon Mit Mette Ingvartsen und Patricia Reed
FEEEEEEEED Collectivize Facebook
INSTALLATION, PERFORMANCE / Englisch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit möglich / Kategorie F
Moderation: Margarita Tsomou, Maximilian Haas
DIALOG, PERFORMANCE / Englisch mit deutscher Simultanübersetzung / Kategorie F
DIALOG / Englisch / Kategorie F
19:00 / HAU1
STO Union & Carte Blanche
P.O.R.N. (Portrait of Restless Narcissism)
Im Anschluss: Artist Talk
Fr 27.3.
11:00 / HAU3 Installationen
THEATER / Englisch / Kategorie C
20:30 / HAU2 / Deutsche Premiere Houseclub präsentiert: 19.–22.3., 27.–29.3., jeweils ab eine Stunde
Thomas Ryckewaert Kareth Schaffer vor und bis eine Stunde nach Veranstaltungen
Move 37 Emojiland! im HAU2
THEATER / Englisch / Kategorie C PERFORMANCE / Deutsch / Eintritt frei
James Bridle
18:00–01:00 / HAU2 Se ti sabir
dgtl fmnsm UK 2019, 19min
So 22.3. HOT MESS / Live-Online-Performance #2
PERFORMANCE, DIALOG / Englisch u. Deutsch / Ein- u. Auslass jederzeit möglich / Kategorie F
INSTALLATION, FILM / Eintritt frei
19.3., 21.+22.3., 28.+29.3., jeweils ab eine Stunde
16:00–20:00 / HAU3 19:00 / HAU3 vor und bis eine Stunde nach Veranstaltungen
NewfrontEars & Oozing Gloop Kat Válastur / HAU im HAU2
FEEEEEEEED Rasp Your Soul dgtl fmnsm
INSTALLATION, PERFORMANCE / Englisch / Ein- und Auslass jederzeit möglich / Kategorie F TANZ / Englisch (Sprache kein Problem) / Kategorie C
HOT MESS
17:00 / HAU2 20:30 / HAU2 / Deutsche Premiere INSTALLATION / Eintritt frei
Thomas Ryckewaert Mette Ingvartsen
Move 37 Moving in Concert
THEATER / Englisch / Kategorie C TANZ / Kategorie C
Kombiticket “Spy on Me #2”: 3 Veranstaltungen für 35,00 €, ermäßigt 20,00 € (frei wählbar 19.–29.3.)
Impressum Tickets Preise
Konzept “Spy on Me #2 – Künstlerische Manöver für die digitale Tageskasse im HAU2 / Montag bis Samstag ab 15 Uhr bis jeweils Kategorie B: 22,00 € / (17,00 €) / (13,00 €), erm.* 10,00 €
Gegenwart”: Annemie Vanackere in Zusammenarbeit mit Sarah eine Stunde vor Vorstellungsbeginn, an vorstellungsfreien Tagen Kategorie C: 17,00 € / (13,00 €), erm.* 10,00 €
Reimann / Programm: Annemie Vanackere, Tobias Schurig (Mu- 15 bis 19 Uhr. / Sonn- und feiertags geschlossen. / Tel. +49 Kategorie D: 13,00 €, erm.* 8,00 €
sik), Margarita Tsomou (Diskurs), Volkan Türeli (Houseclub) / Dra- (0)30.259004 -27 / Online-Buchung: www.hebbel-am-ufer.de Kategorie E: 8,00 €, erm.* 5,00 €
maturgie: Sarah Reimann / Dramaturgische Mitarbeit: Maria Röß- Kategorie F: 5,00 €, erm.* 3,00 €
ler / Redaktion: Lisa Maria Ahrens, Annika Frahm, Sarah Reimann, Ticketing & Service Preise in Klammern veranstaltungsabhängig.
Maria Rößler / Korrektorat: Iris Weißenböck / Gestaltung: Jürgen Tel 030.259 004 -102, service@hebbel-am-ufer.de / Telefo-
Fehrmann / Fotos: Jürgen Fehrmann, Dorothea Tuch / Recherche nisch: Montag bis Freitag 12–18 Uhr / Bestellen Sie unseren *Ermäßigte Karten gelten für Schüler*innen, Studierende, Ju-
Bildstrecke: Christian Grauvogel, Tim Nebert / Comic: Julia Newsletter oder unseren Leporello unter www.hebbel-am-ufer.de. gendliche im Freiwilligendienst, Sozialhilfe- oder Arbeitslosen-
Schneider, Lena Kadriye Ziyal, weneedtotalk.ai, Creative Com- geld-Empfänger*innen, Inhaber*innen eines Schwerbehinder-
mons BY-NC-SA-4.0 / Hrsg: HAU Hebbel am Ufer, 2020 / Inten- Barrierefreiheit tenausweises, Grundwehrdienstleistende, Auszubildende so-
danz & Geschäftsführung: Annemie Vanackere HAU1: barrierefrei / HAU2: barrierefrei / HAU3: nicht barrierefrei / wie Empfänger*innen nach dem Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz
Rollstuhlfahrer*innen bitten wir, sich bis einen Tag vor der Vorstel- und sind nur mit einem Nachweis gültig.
Adressen lung bei unserem Ticketing- und Service-Team anzumelden unter
HAU1 – Stresemannstraße 29, 10963 Berlin service@hebbel-am-ufer.de oder 030.259 004 -102
➞ www.hebbel-am-ufer.de
HAU2 – Hallesches Ufer 32, 10963 Berlin
HAU3 – Tempelhofer Ufer 10, 10963 BerlinYou can also read
