Can a program of food and diabetes education improve the quality of the lives of diabetic patients with a previous myocardial infarction?

Page created by Bryan Mccoy
 
CONTINUE READING
Ann Ig 2018; 30: 120-127 doi:10.7416/ai.2018.2203

Can a program of food and diabetes education improve
the quality of the lives of diabetic patients with a previous
myocardial infarction?
A.Tantucci1, C. Ripani1, C. Giannini1, M. Fregonese1, M. De Angelis1

Key words: Diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes education, food education
Parole chiave: Diabete, malattie cardiovascolari, educazione al diabete, educazione alimentare

Abstract

    Background and objectives. People with diabetes and cardiovascular complications need to be educated
    about the self-management of the disease at the time of diagnosis and during the follow-up to best benefit from
    what they learn. Education is most effective when offered to small groups of patients led by a professional
    team.
    The aim of the study is the evaluation of diabetes and food education aimed at improving the self-awareness
    of the disease, the management and the quality of the lives of diabetic patients with a previous myocardial
    infarction.
    Methods and results. The sample group consisted of 20 subjects suffering from diabetes mellitus type 2 with
    a previous myocardial infarction.
    First, subjects were administered a test to assess the degree of knowledge of diabetes and quality of life;
    they also performed a walking test and a food interview. Anthropometric assessments and serum chemistry
    parameters were taken into consideration. Subsequently, they attended 7 lessons on nutrition, diabetes and
    cardiovascular complications; post intervention, the sample group demonstrated statistically significant
    improvement in the knowledge of the disease, in anthropometric measurements and walking test.
    Conclusion. Although we have not found an improvement of biochemical parameters, informing diabetic
    subjects of their health conditions and complications is essential in order to achieve patient empowerment
    and the compliance.

Introduction                                                with the traditional relationship between
                                                            doctor and patient and the first to understand
    The education of diabetic patients has a                the importance of education of diabetic
crucial role in the success of the disease.                 subjects (1).
    The concept of therapeutic education was                   In 1997, in the United States, the National
introduced in the 70s by Jean Philippe Assal,               Diabetes Education Program (NDEP),
a young endocrinologist shortly after he                    sponsored by the National Institutes of
realized that he was suffering from diabetes;               Health and the Center for Disease Control
he was the first to express dissatisfaction                 and Prevention, was launched with the

1
 Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Perugia University School of
Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy
Education and Prevention in Diabetic People                                                  121

aim of reducing morbidity and mortality           took place about the experiences of each
from diabetes and its complications (2).          participant. In addition, these meetings were
To achieve this aim, Dr. Assal tried to raise     not conducted using a scientific-medical
awareness of the seriousness of diabetes, its     language, while concepts were represented
risk factors and prevention strategies, and to    through metaphors and images.
promote self-management diabetes among                The objective of the above study was
patients.                                         the evaluation of improvements in terms of
    In Italy, the Diabetes Education Study        knowledge of the disease, quality of life,
Group (GISED) and the Italian Society of          Body Mass Index and blood chemistry such
Diabetology (SID) have identified seven           as glycosylated hemoglobin and the lipid
key educational objectives in a program of        profile following an educational intervention.
therapeutic education for diabetic patients       This study found that subjects of the
(3):                                              intervention group had an improvement in
    • appropriate diet adoption;                  biochemical parameters, Body Mass Index,
    • correct application of therapy;             knowledge of the disease and quality of life,
    • physical activity;                          while there were no significant changes in
    • glucose monitoring;                         the subjects of the control group.
    • ability to solve metabolic emergencies          Another important study was done in
and critical situations;                          the United Kingdom through DESMOND
    • surveillance of complications;              (Diabetes Education and Self Management
    • appropriate health behavior and search      for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed), the
for better quality of life.                       first national education program for people
    Education can be conducted in various         with diabetes mellitus type 2. This study,
ways, one of which is represented by the          however, revealed that an educational
education group. This type of intervention        program aiming to increase knowledge and
has several advantages, such as the possibility   improve the lifestyle of patients did not have
to educate many people at the same time           significant effects on the intervention group
and the opportunities of interaction among        compared with the control group (6).
patients. Sharing experiences with other              The study investigating the association
patients, in fact, can greatly help individuals   between cardiovascular events and lifestyle
to cope with the disease. In group meetings,      was the “Seven Country Study” conducted in
however, it is important to avoid the classic     Minnesota by Ancel Keys and collaborators
distinction between teacher and student as        between 1958 and 1970 in which men
this model would prove inefficacious; while       between 40 and 59 years of age from
it is important that patients have an active      7 different countries (Yugoslavia, the
role and the teacher assumes the role of          Netherlands, Japan, Italy, Greece, USA,
moderator of the group (4).                       Finland) were examined (7).
    The ROMEO (Rethink Organization to                This study cast light on the importance
Improve Education and Outcomes) Study (5)         of nutrition and the role of individual
is a clinical trial conducted over a four-year    nutrients and was subsequently amplified
period on 815 patients with type 2 diabetes,      and confirmed by multiple studies that have
not given insulin, divided into a control group   been conducted from the 1980s until today.
and an intervention group. The intervention       The Mediterranean diet is associated, in
group participated in seven one-hour              general, with an average reduction of 30%
sessions in which experiences of daily life,      in cardiovascular risk. (8, 9). The primary
such as shopping and choosing a menu, were        approach for achieving and maintaining
simulated. During the sessions a conversation     weight loss is the change in lifestyle, which
122                                                                             A. Tantucci et al.

includes a reduction in caloric intake and      Health Organization Quality Of Life,
an increase of physical activity (10). People   WHOQOL-BREF) to assess the quality of
with diabetes should receive nutritional        life, consisting of 26 questions investigating
counseling: education in small groups and/      four aspects of the quality of life: physical
or a setting with an individualized education   health, psychological state, social and
program has proven beneficial for those at      environmental context, and relationships
risk of diabetes or those who are diabetic.     (the range of the medium score goes from
   At the moment there is no evidence to        0 to 4).
suggest the benefits of a low-carbohydrate          They also performed the “Six-minute
diets (or with a restriction to below 130 g/    walking test”, or “walk test”, which is
day) (11). As mentioned previously, the         the gold standard test to evaluate the
performance of an adequate level of physical    functional capacity of the patient (13) and
activity, to promote weight loss and improved   a food interview to calculate the Italian
glycemic control, is important.                 Mediterranean Index (IMI) (14); IMI score is
   In type 2 diabetes, aerobic and anaerobic    based on 10 items: high intakes of 6 typical
exercises, associated with moderate weight      Mediterranean foods (pasta, vegetables,
loss, has proven effective in improving         fruit, pulses, olive oil, fish), low intakes of 4
glycemic levels and some parameters of          non-Mediterranean foods (sugar-sweetened
metabolic syndrome and in preventing the        beverages, butter, red meat and potatoes). If
loss of muscle mass (12).                       consumption of typical Mediterranean foods
   The present study was carried out            was in the third tertile of the distribution, the
through a program with a therapeutic and        subject received 1 point, for all other intakes
food education group, in which we tried         received 0 points; if consumption of non-
to encourage discussion and interaction         Mediterranean foods was in the first tertile of
among patients. The aim of this study           the distribution, subject received 1 point.
was to evaluate the effectiveness of group          Anthropometric variables considered
education in diabetic subjects with known       were: weight, height and waist circumference
acute cardiovascular events. Considering        (WC) and the Body Mass Index (BMI)
educational GISED outcomes as fundamental       was calculated. In addition, several blood
in a program of therapeutic education of        parameters to evaluate the glycometabolic
diabetic patients, changes of biochemical       and cardiovascular state of patients were
parameters (HbA1c and lipid profile),           taken into consideration: glycosylated
eating habits, knowledge about the disease,     haemoglobin (HbA1c) total cholesterol,
quality of lifestyle and changes in weight      triglycerides (TAG), LDL and HDL
and body composition which occurred             cholesterol fractions.
during the course of the study were taken           In the following months the subjects
into account.                                   involved in the survey attended seven group
                                                lessons, of about one hour each. During the
                                                lessons our team tried to increase knowledge
Methods                                         about the disease and understanding of the
                                                importance of a healthy lifestyle to optimize
   20 subjects recruited for the study took     glycemic control and to reduce the risk of
two tests to assess their degree of knowledge   developing complications. In these meetings
of diabetes: the GISED Questionnaire,           we talked about:
that consists of 32 questions (1 point for          • diabetes and classification;
each question) about diabetes and its               • self monitoring of blood glucose
complications, and another test (World          (SMBG) and acute complications;
Education and Prevention in Diabetic People                                                                 123

   • diabetes therapy;                                       Based on IMI score, ranging from 0 to
   • chronic complications and cardiovascular             10, adherence to Mediterranean Diet (MD)
disease;                                                  was classified as low (≤3), medium (4-5),
   • importance of physical activity;                     high (≥6) (14).
   • digestive system, nutrients and food
groups;
   • mediterranean diet and guidelines for                Results
a healthy diet.
   Patients were very interested in all                      Table 1 shows weight, BMI and WC at the
the classes, but particularly in lessons on               beginning (0) and at the end (1) of the study;
nutrition and good eating habits.                         Table 2 shows the results of the GISED test to
   After completing all meetings, we                      assess diabetes knowledge and the functional
made initial assessments to evaluate any                  capacity measured using the “Six Minute
modifications and improvements resulting                  Walking Test” at the beginning (0) and at
from what was learned during the classes.                 the end of the study (1); Table 3 shows the
   Comparisons between data collected                     haematobiochemical parameters (HbA1c, total
before and after the lessons were carried out             cholesterol, LDL, HDL, TAG) at the beginning
with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney method.                    (T=0) and at the end (T=1) of the study; Table
For statistical analysis SPSS 22.0 was used               4 shows mean, standard deviation, minimum,
and the threshold of significance was set at              maximum and percentiles of weight, BMI,
p < 0.05.                                                 WC, GISED and SMWT.

Table 1 - Weight, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) at the beginning (T=0) and at the end (T=1)
of the study

Code          Age      Sex      Height    Weight    Weight    BMI (Kg/     BMI (Kg/        WC          WC
                                 (cm)     (Kg) 0    (Kg) 1     m2) T 0     m2) T T 1      (cm) 0      (cm) 1
1              68       M         175       75        74        25.06       24.72           95          93
2              41       M         172      116       114        39.21       38.53           127         126
3              72       M         164      135       133        50.19       49.45           155         155
4              50       F         165       80        76        29.38       27.91           105          86
5              57       M         163       60        59        22.58       22.21            87        85.5
6              69       M         168       87        87        30.82       30.82           109         110
7              67       M         173      104       104        34.75       34.75           120         120
8              65       M         170       93        92        32.18       31.83           112         112
9              72       M         170       77        75        26.64       25.95           101         101
10             54       M         177       77        76        24.58       24.26          95.5        95.5
11             72       M         173       92        92        30.74       30.74            88          90
12             68       M         165       88        88        32.32       32.32           111         109
13             70       M         170       79        79        27.33       27.33            99         100
14             76       M         168       83        82        29.41       29.05           105         105
15             77       M         168      77.6       78        27.49       27.64           107         107
16             62       M         162       83        80        31.62       30.48           115         108
17             69       M         170       77       75.5       26.64       26.12           102         102
18             58       F         165       61        60         22.4       22.04            92          90
19             70       M         172       94        94        31.77       31.77           119         119
20             61       M         168      104       103        36.85        36.5           127         122
124                                                                                            A. Tantucci et al.

Table 2 - GISED test and “Six minutes walking test” (SMWT) at the beginning (0) and at the end (1) of the study

Code                   GISED (32) 0          GISED (32) 1              SMWT (m) 0              SMWT (m) 1
1                          19                    27                      521.3                   527.4
2                          16                    30                      533.4                   548.7
3                          20                    28                      288.6                   302.1
4                          16                    27                        459                   490.5
5                          22                    31                      294.3                   297.1
6                          20                    30                      479.7                   489.3
7                          21                    29                      273.9                   395.1
8                          22                    31                       383.4                   503.1
9                          24                    29                        375                     450
10                         19                    29                        325                     311
11                         28                    30                        390                     360
12                         28                    30                        270                     310
13                         10                    29                        475                     510
14                         20                    30                        435                     450
15                         17                    23                      347.16                  389.04
16                         19                    23                      436.53                  430.34
17                         21                    25                      466.03                  530.92
18                         21                    26                      431.81                  498.47
19                         23                    26                      229.47                  319.14
20                         21                    28                      499.06                  536.52

Table 3 - Haematobiochemical parameters at the beginning (0) and at the end (1) of the study

Code      HbA1c      HbA1c     Tot chol Tot chol      LDL       LDL        HDL       HDL       TAG       TAG
           (0)        (1)        (0)      (1)          (0)       (1)        (0)       (1)       (0)       (1)
1          5.9        6.2        409      216         316       156         39        34       269       128
2          8.1        8.0        230      227          68        64         53        52       168       163
3          8.6        8.4        280      258         201       179         48        42       222       183
4          5.7        5.7        123      101          33        31         71        68        92        93
5          4.9        5.7        136      146          69        71         50        56        84        94
6          8.3        8.3        161      171          83        81         46        48       159       258
7          7.8        6.3        141      121          61        59         32        34       238       142
8          7.2        6.5        180      118          58        50         30        35       137       164
9          6.3        6.2        210      197          83        68         41        40       233       198
10         5.9        7.0        197      124         115        63         35        43       231        90
11         7.2        8.2        145      154          84        87         42        49        95        90
12         6.2        6.2        115      137          58        74         43        45        70        91
13         5.6        5.6        115       83          51        44         41        32        72        33
14         7.2        7.4        212      183         111        86         70        56       153       205
15         5.8        5.8        102       81          52        46         60        58       137       139
16         7.4        6.4         80       80          37        34         25        26       101       101
17         6.8        6.8        184      184         109       102         63        63        61        61
18         5.9        5.9        135      129          69        68         40        40       125       122
19         7.4        8.1        127      136          70        69         33        35       116       162
20         8.8        8.8        159      140          72        49         33        32       270       294
Education and Prevention in Diabetic People                                                               125

Table 4 - Mean, Standard Deviation, Minimum, Maximum and Percentiles of weight, BMI, WC, GISED and
SMWT

N            Weight    Weight        BMI      BMI       WC        WC       GISED    GISED    SMWT     SMWT
                0         1            0        1         0         1         0        1         0        1
Mean           20        20           20       20        20        20        20       20        20       20
St deviation 87.1       86.1         30.6     30.2     108.6     106.8      20.4     28.1     395.7    432.4
Minumum       17.6      17.6          6.4      6.3      16.0      16.5       4.0      2.4      91.8     89.5
Maximum       60.0      59.0         22.4     22.0      87.0      85.5      10.0     23.0     229.5    297.1
Percentile   135.0     133.0         50.2     49.4     155.0     155.0      28.0     31.0     533.4    548.7
   25         77.0      75.6         26.6     26.0      96.4      93.6      19.0     26.3     302.0    329.4
   50         83.0      81.0         30.1     29.8     106.0     106.0      20.5     29.0     410.9    450.0
   75         93.8      93.5         32.3     32.2     118.0     117.3      22.0     30.0     472.8    508.3

Table 5 - Statistical analysis of weight, BMI, WC, GISED and SMWT

                                                  Test Statisticsa
                   Weight 1 (kg) -          BMI 1 -          WC 1 (cm) -    GISED 1 (32) -    SMWT 1 (M) -
                   Weight 0 (kg)            BMI 0             WC 0 (cm)     GISED 0 (32)       MWT 0(M)
Z                     -3.282b               -3.234b             -2.014b        -3.924c          -3.248c
Asymp.
                          .001               .001              .044                .000           .001
Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
b. Based on positive ranks.
c. Based on negative ranks.
BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; SMWT: six minutes walking test; HbA1c: glycated haemoglobin;
Tot chol: total cholesterol; TAG: triglycerides

   There is statistically significant                      mg/dL and 150 mg/dL respectively; slight
improvement in weight, BMI and WC (p≤                      reduction for total cholesterol (167.05 ±
.001; p≤ 0.001; p= 0.044 respectively),                    77.81 vs 149.3 ± 37.88), too. No important
functional capacity measured using the “Six                variations regarding HDL (44.75 ± 12.58
Minute Walking Test” (p=0.001) and in                      vs 44.4 ± 1103) and HbA1c (6.85 ± 1.09 vs
knowledge about diabetes using the GISED                   6.87 ± 1.03), remaining below 7%.
questionnaire (p=0.000) (Tab. 5).                             No improvement in the perception of
   No significant differences in                           quality of life and physical health measured
haematobiochemical parameters, probably                    using the WHOQOL-BREF, whereas a slight
due to the limited time span from the                      improvement regarding medium values
beginning and the end of the study (two                    of IMI, that shifts from 2.35 ± 1.7 (low
months) to check an improvement in this                    adherence) to 3.25 ± 1.6 (medium adherence)
sense; however, we can see a slight lipid                  (Tab. 6), although diets remain imbalanced
improvement and medium values of LDL                       from the qualitative point of view, for the
(90 ± 68.44 vs 74.05 ± 30.31) and TAG                      excessive intake of soluble (simple) sugars,
(151.65 ± 75.61 vs 140.55 ± 74.27), that fall              animal proteins and saturated lipids (data
within recommended limits, less than 100                   not reported).
126                                                                                                 A. Tantucci et al.

Discussion                                                  di un programma di educazione alimentare, al diabete e
                                                            alle sue complicanze cardiovascolari sulla diminuzione
                                                            dei fattori di rischio cardiovascolari e sul miglioramento
     The data we obtained allow us to make a                dell’autogestione della malattia.
number of considerations. At the first sight,                  Metodi e risultati. Il gruppo campione consiste di
it is possible to conclude that the subjects are            20 pazienti di ambo i sessi, con età compresa tra i 50 e
highly satisfied with the intervention program              70 anni, affetti da diabete mellito tipo 2 con pregresso
with 100% agreeing that participation have                  infarto del miocardio.
increased the knowledge and self-awareness                     All’inizio ai soggetti è stato somministrato un test per
                                                            valutare il grado di conoscenza del diabete e la qualità
of the disease; one of the strongest indicators             della vita; hanno inoltre eseguito un “test del cammino”
of satisfaction was the 33% of the sample                   e un’intervista alimentare.
indicating they would repeat the course                        Sono stati presi in considerazione i parametri antro-
regularly, so that the basics are not forgotten,            pometrici ed ematobiochimici. Successivamente, hanno
and would recommend the program to the                      partecipato a 7 incontri teorici riguardanti l’educazione
many more people who have the same                          alimentare, il diabete e le complicanze cardiovascolari;
                                                            infine, sono state ricontrollate le valutazioni iniziali per
problems.
                                                            verificare eventuali modifiche e miglioramenti.
     This project has established a preliminary                Non ci sono state differenze statisticamente signifi-
study of diabetes and food education and it                 cative per quanto riguarda i parametri ematobiochimici
is useful in order to verify the importance                 e la qualità della vita, mentre miglioramenti statistica-
of this type of intervention, with the aim of               mente significativi sono stati rilevati nella conoscenza
improving the living conditions of patients                 circa la malattia, le misure antropometriche e il “test
suffering from this pathology. Although we                  del cammino”.
                                                               L’intero campione risulta essere soddisfatto della
have not found significant improvement                      tipologia dell’intervento.
of biochemical parameters (probably the                        Conclusione. Anche se non abbiamo riscontrato un
time elapsed between the start and the                      miglioramento statisticamente significativo dei parametri
conclusion of the project is too short to                   ematobiochimici e la loro funzionalità, informare i sog-
obtain a significant change in this sense)                  getti diabetici delle loro condizioni di salute e complican-
informing diabetic subjects about their                     ze è essenziale per ottenere una maggiore compliance, in
                                                            modo che essi possano prendere possesso della malattia
condition is essential in order to achieve                  e diventarne parte attiva.
patient empowerment and compliance; these
are the basics of therapeutic education.
                                                            References
Acknowledgements: We are extremely grateful to all
the participants and their families.
                                                             1. Assal JP. A global integrated approach to diabe-
Conflict of interest: None                                      tes: A challenge for more efficient therapy. In:
                                                                Davidson JD, ed. Clinical Diabetes Mellitus. A
                                                                Problem-Oriented Approach. 2nd ed. Stuttgart,
Riassunto                                                       Germany: Thieme, 1991: 703-7.16.
                                                             2. Gallivan J, Greenberg R, Brown C. The Na-
Un programma di educazione alimentare ed al dia-
                                                                tional Diabetes Education Program Evaluation
bete può migliorare la qualità della vita dei pazienti
                                                                Framework: How to Design an Evaluation of a
diabetici con pregresso infarto del miocardio?
                                                                Multifaceted Public Health Education Program.
                                                                Prev Chronic Dis 2008; 5(4): A134.
   Introduzione e scopo. Le persone con diabete e            3. Miselli V. La valutazione degli interventi edu-
complicanze cardiovascolari dovrebbero essere educate
                                                                cativi nel diabete. GIDM 2000; 20: 37-40.
a gestire la propria malattia al momento della diagnosi
                                                             4. Assal JP, Mühlhauser I, Pernet A, et al. Patient
e durante il follow-up per ricavare il massimo beneficio
da ciò che hanno imparato. L’educazione è più efficiente
                                                                education as the basis for diabetes care in clinical
se condotta in piccoli gruppi di pazienti da un team pro-       practice and research. Diabetologia 1985; 28(8):
fessionale. Lo scopo dello studio è valutare l’efficacia        602-13.
Education and Prevention in Diabetic People                                                                      127

 5. Trento M, Gamba S, Gentile L, et al. For The                 cietà Italiana di Diabetologia (SID) - Standard
    Romeo Investigators. Rethink Organization to                 italiani per la cura del diabete mellito 2014.
    Improve Education and Outcomes (ROMEO).                      Available from: http://www.standarditaliani.it/skin/
    Diab Care 2010; 33(4): 745-7.                                www.standarditaliani.it/pdf/STANDARD_2014_
 6. Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner TC, et al. Ef-                  May28.pdf [Last accessed: 2017, Apr 21].
    fectiveness of the diabetes education and self         11.   Dyson P. Low Carbohydrate Diets and Type 2
    management for ongoing and newly diagnosed                   Diabetes: What is the Latest Evidence? Diabetes
    (DESMOND) programme for people with newly                    Ther 2015; 6(4): 411-24.
    diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised          12.   Thent ZC, Das S, Henry LJ. Role of exercise in
    controlled trial. BMJ 2008 Mar 1; 336(7642):                 the management of Diabetes Mellitus: The Global
                                                                 Scenario. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): e80436.
    491–95.
                                                           13.   Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S. A
 7. Keys A, Mienotti A, Karvonen MJ, et al. The
                                                                 qualitative systematic overview of the measurement
    diet and 15-year death rate in the seven countries
                                                                 properties of functional walk test used in the car-
    study. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124(6): 903-15.                  diorespiratory domain. Chest 2001; 119: 256-70.
 8. Trichopoulou A, Kouris-Blazos A, Wahlqvist             14.   Agnoli C, Krogh V, Grioni S, et al. A prioridefined
    ML, et al. Diet and overall survival in elderly              dietary patters are associated with reduced risk of
    people. BMJ 1995; 311: 1457-60.                              stroke in a large Italian cohort. J Nutr 2011; 141:
 9. Trichopoulou A, Orfanos P, Norat T, et al.                   1552-8.
    Modified Mediterranean diet and survival: EPIC-        15.   Bonaccio M, Di Castelnuovo A, Bonanni A, et al.
    elderly prospective cohort study. BMJ 2005;                  Decline of the Mediterranean diet at the time of
    330: 991.                                                    economic crisis. Results from the Moli-sani study.
10. Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD) - So-                  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2014; 24:8 53-60.

Corresponding author: Dr Alice Tantucci, Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and
Metabolism, Perugia University School of Medicine, University of Perugia, Via del Giochetto, 06123 Perugia, Italy
e-mail: alice.tantucci@alice.it
You can also read