Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis - NEI Position Paper - NEI Investments

Page created by Mitchell Ortiz
 
CONTINUE READING
Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis - NEI Position Paper - NEI Investments
Investing Responsibly in
Canadian Cannabis

           NEI Position Paper
Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis - NEI Position Paper - NEI Investments
NEI Position Paper
              Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis

On June 20, 2018, Bill C-45 – The Cannabis Act – was passed,1 with the expectation that Canadians will be
able to legally consume recreational cannabis without criminal penalties by October 17, 2018. Canadian
cannabis stocks surged on the news, with Canopy Growth gaining almost 6% in one day. Year to date,2
Aurora Cannabis Inc. and Canopy Growth Corp. have been the second- and fourth-most active stocks,
respectively, on the TSX.3 Over the same period, stock prices for both companies have been volatile —
Canopy’s price has ranged from as high as $47.76 to as low as $24.11.

All this suggests that investors should exercise caution before jumping onto this bandwagon. But beyond
concerns about volatility and returns, should responsible investors climb aboard?

NEI’s ESG Services Team has developed a position on cannabis by examining:

        1. Where cannabis fits under our evaluation process by comparing it to products with
           some similarities, including tobacco, alcohol and prescription medicine.
        2. The state of the regulatory and market environments.
        3. The environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks that are most material to
           cannabis companies.

As responsible investors, we seek to generate sustainable value for shareholders and other company
stakeholders, as well as for society as a whole. As such, we need to determine whether the cannabis
industry has the potential to create sustainable value, which ESG risks are inherent to the industry and
whether cannabis companies are adequately positioned to be responsible stewards of their products and
services.

Exclusionary Screening
While we do not exclude most so-called “sin-stocks,” we exclude companies that provide certain products
or services based on science-based evidence of harm, violation of international law or inconsistency with
widely accepted societal norms. Tobacco is such an industry. Due to the product’s harmful nature and
lack of any broader societal benefits we don’t believe it can bring sustainable value to our funds in the
long term; and engagement with tobacco companies would be futile, as the only acceptable outcome
would be to cease operating their primary business.
Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis - NEI Position Paper - NEI Investments
NEI Position Paper
                  Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis

How should we view cannabis?
In Table 1, based on available information, we compare direct and indirect health impacts, addictiveness
and the potential for misuse of tobacco, alcohol and medical and recreational cannabis. We also compare
the levels of regulation and the potential to engage each industry.

Table 1: Comparing Medical and Recreational Cannabis with Tobacco, Alcohol and Prescription Medicine

                          Tobacco             Alcohol               Prescription             Medical         Recreational
                                                                     medicine               cannabis          cannabis

    Purpose               Recreation         Recreation                 Health                Health          Recreation

     Legal                   Yes                 Yes                      Yes                   Yes          Exp. Q3, 2018

  Prescription                No                 No                       Yes                   Yes               No
   Required

    Impact

                                                                      Safe level of         Safe level of
                        No safe level         Safe level              exposure as           exposure as        Safe level
     Direct
                        of exposure          of exposure             prescribed by         prescribed by      of exposure
                                                                        a doctor              a doctor

                                                                                                               Driving or
                                              Driving or
                                                                    None, assuming        None, assuming    operating heavy
                       Passive smoking     operating heavy
                                                                      exposure as           exposure as     machinery while
    Indirect           has no safe level   machinery while
                                                                     prescribed by         prescribed by       under the
                         of exposure          under the
                                                                        a doctor              a doctor       influence and
                                              influence
                                                                                                             passive smoke

  Potential for
   Addiction                                                   

  Potential to
    misuse                                                      

   Regulated

   Production                                                                        

   Marketing                                                                         
    Sales &
  Distribution                                                                       

  Engagement

  Potential for
  engagement                                                                         

                                                       - High         - Medium to High          - Medium to Low     - Low
Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis - NEI Position Paper - NEI Investments
NEI Position Paper
              Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis

When we examine the health implications of the compared substances, we note that tobacco has
adverse impacts on health, has no health-enhancing qualities and has no safe level of exposure. In
contrast, studies show that cannabis can have a therapeutic effect for a range of conditions, including
chronic pain.4 However, studies comparing cannabis and tobacco smoke indicate that the former can
contain some of the same carcinogenic chemicals found in tobacco smoke.5 The Dutch Office of Medical
Cannabis states that inhaling any type of smoke is inherently unhealthy and damaging to the lungs,
and recommends inhaling cannabis using a reliable vaporiser.6 To date, no concrete evidence has been
found linking long-term, heavy cannabis use to cancer, but studies show that, like alcohol, heavy use of
cannabis during adolescence can have adverse effects on mental health and psychosocial development.7

Misuse of certain prescribed medicines can be fatal (through overdose or drug interactions) or lead
to addiction.8 Medical cannabis is already consumed as a prescription medicine or as an ingredient in
prescription medicine, and medical cannabis producers have to adhere to regulations set by Health
Canada and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for monitoring and testing. There is no evidence
that medical cannabis used in high dosages can lead to overdose death.

The biggest indirect health impact from cannabis consumption is impaired driving. Similar to alcohol,
cannabis can slow reaction times, lower the ability to pay attention and affect coordination. A Columbia
University study9 found that the chance of a fatal traffic incident increases up to 14 times when under
the influence of alcohol, compared to up to two times when under the influence of cannabis. When
alcohol and cannabis are combined those rates increase significantly.
NEI Position Paper
               Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis

Is cannabis addictive? Long-term regular use of cannabis can be. It is estimated that 9% of cannabis
users become dependent,10 compared to 15% of alcohol users, up to 26% of prescription opioid users11
and 32% of tobacco users.12

Our analysis shows that the profiles of recreational and medical cannabis share the most similarities
with alcohol and prescription medicine in terms of risks, health-enhancing opportunities and the level
of regulation required to ensure safe use.

Regulatory & Market Environment
As of January 2018, there were 88 licensed producers of cannabis for medical purposes in Canada.13
Upon coming into force, The Cannabis Act will allow adults (18 years and older) to purchase, possess
and share up to 30 grams of legal recreational cannabis.14 The sale and distribution of cannabis
products is to be provincially regulated. In Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia,
PEI and Newfoundland the sale and distribution will be conducted through the current provincial liquor
authority15, while BC and Alberta will allow private operators, but retailers would be required to purchase
their supply from the government’s wholesale distribution system.16 It is important to note that the
patchwork of legal frameworks in the U.S. and other countries suggests that it is crucial for cannabis
companies to implement strict governance structures (see below) to ensure that their products do not
become part of the illicit drug trade in other jurisdictions.

At this stage, the market is relatively small but growing rapidly. The growth strategy of many companies
seems to rely on mergers and acquisitions to gain size and operational assets. Certain companies —
including Canopy Growth — have created separate subsidiaries for recreational and medical cannabis.
The beverage sector has also signalled interest in recreational cannabis. For example, Constellation
Brands acquired a stake in Canopy Growth, aiming to diversify into cannabis-infused non-alcoholic
drinks,17 and Second Cup has partnered with National Access Cannabis (NAC)18 to apply jointly for
licences for Second Cup stores in Western Canada, where cannabis-based products are expected to be
distributed by private operators. If it receives government approval, Second Cup plans to convert some
of its coffee shops into cannabis cafes and dispensaries.
NEI Position Paper
                   Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis

Key ESG Risks of investing in Medical and Recreational Cannabis

                                                                  Marketing          Post
    Research                 Manufacture         Distribution                      Marketing
                                                                   & Sales

• Safety of               • Quality           • Quality         • Ethical       • Adverse drug
  clinical trial            management          management        marketing       reaction
  participants                                                                    monitoring
                          • Drug & side       • Packaging       • Fair
• Clinical                                      & product                       • Investigation
                            effect safety                         pricing
  trial data                                    safety                            and corrective
  transparency                                                                    action
                          • Resource          • Resource        • Access to       (e.g. recalls)
• Responsible               efficiency          efficiency        medicine
  animal                    & waste                                             • Counterfeit
  testing                   management                          • Bribery and     drugs
                                                                  corruption
                          • Employee
• Innovation
                            health &                            • Sales
                            safety                                incentives
• Employee
  health &                • Compliance
  safety
NEI Position Paper
            Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis

Material ESG risks that cannabis companies should prioritize
     Environmental: Growing cannabis requires optimal conditions of temperature, humidity and
     light intensity; hence the bulk of cannabis is grown indoors (without natural sunlight) or in
     greenhouses. Both methods are extremely energy intensive, resulting in potentially large carbon
     footprints; and water intensive, resulting in environmental and social risk from wastewater
     discharge and drawing excessive groundwater in water scarce regions. Most cannabis companies
     that acknowledge ESG risk in their MD&A disclosure focus on environmental and climate change
     risks, which we view positively.

     Social: Quality control and product safety are the most significant social risks for cannabis
     producers. Cannabis has to meet certain quality standards — tested and monitored by Health
     Canada and the FDA — and must not contain pesticides, heavy metals, fungi or bacteria.
     Product safety has been under greater public scrutiny since medical cannabis provider
     Organigram (recently acquired by Canopy Growth) had to recall some of its products because of
     contamination with a banned pesticide.19 The company faces several class-action lawsuits as a
     result, after patients reported suffering from severe nausea after daily use of the contaminated
     product.20

     The nature of the product presents a second significant social risk. The Canadian Medical
     Association has stressed the need for access to substance abuse and mental health services
     to be expanded.21 The federal government has committed $62.5 million to cannabis education
     programs for youth.22 In addition to federal and provincial contributions, cannabis producers will
     likely be required to contribute to education and addiction treatment programs, in the way that
     producers of alcoholic beverages participate in and spearhead programs for alcohol addiction
     and impaired driving education.

    Thirdly, cannabis companies state that a positive public perception is crucial to achieving the
    social licence to operate. We agree and, as such, identify responsible marketing and post
    marketing co-vigilance policies and practices as another key issue for cannabis producers.

    Governance: As stated earlier, cannabis companies have experienced unprecedented growth over
    the last year and, as a result, have found it challenging to scale up their corporate governance
    controls to keep pace with that growth. As the industry will be heavily scrutinized by regulators
    and may be prone to criticism from the public, cannabis companies need independent and
    qualified board oversight to provide accountability to stakeholders, including investors. Proper
    corporate governance controls can assist in bridging the credibility gap in this new industry.
NEI Position Paper
                 Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis

 Conclusion
 What does this mean for Responsible Investors? Based on our analysis, we believe that manufacturers of
 both medical and recreational cannabis have the potential to be responsible stewards of their products,
 provided they implement risk management systems that ensure minimal individual, environmental and
 societal harm and maximum safety in a market where they have the social and regulatory licence to
 operate.

 For our funds that incorporate ESG evaluation, rather than screening out cannabis stocks we will assess
 cannabis-related companies based on their capacity and commitments to satisfy our expectations for
 managing the previously described material ESG risks. We will also assess each company’s willingness to
 engage in dialogue about enhancing its risk management processes and disclosure.

 Publication authored by ESG Services Department:
 Rosa van den Beemt - Senior ESG Analyst, Healthcare, Telecommunications
 Tishya Ballaney - ESG Analyst, Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples

 For more information on Responsible Investing, please visit:
 www.neiinvestments.com

This document is provided for informational purposes only and it is not intended to provide specific advice including,
without limitation, investment, financial, tax or similar matters. NEI Investments endeavors to ensure that the contents
have been compiled or derived from sources that we believe are reliable and contain information that is accurate and
complete. However, NEI Investments makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, in respect thereof, takes
no responsibility for any errors and omissions contained herein.

Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry or market sector should not be considered an
indication of trading intent of any funds managed by NEI Investments.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund
investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change
frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Northwest Funds, Ethical Funds and NEI Investments are
registered trademarks of Northwest & Ethical Investments L.P. Northwest & Ethical Investments Inc., is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Aviso Wealth Inc. (“Aviso”). Aviso is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aviso Wealth Limited Partnership (“Aviso
Wealth LP”), which in turn is owned 50% by Desjardins Financial Holdings Inc. (“Desjardins”) and 50% by a limited
partnership owned by the five Provincial Credit Union Centrals (the “Centrals”) and the CUMIS Group Limited.
NEI Position Paper
                   Investing Responsibly in Canadian Cannabis

Sources and Footnotes:
1 https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/news/2018/06/bill-c-45-the-cannabis-act-passed-in-senate.html
2 As of June 21, 2018.
3 Most Active Stocks of 2018-Globe and Mail
4 https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/dhp-mps/alt_formats/pdf/marihuana/med/infoprof-eng.pdf
5 https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/dhp-mps/alt_formats/pdf/marihuana/med/infoprof-eng.pdf
6 https://www.cannabisbureau.nl/Media/Default/PDF/5089-A5-BMC-Pat-ENG-web_35842.pdf
7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19837255
8 http://www.ccdus.ca/Resource%20Library/CCSA-Canadian-Drug-Summary-Prescription-Opioids-2017-en.pdf
9 https://www.cuinjuryresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Li-et-al-AAP-2013.pdf
10 https://www.canada.ca/en/services/health/campaigns/marijuana-cannabis/health-effects.html#a2
11 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03052.x
12 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-truth-about-pot/
13 https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medical-use-marijuana/licensed-producers/authorized-licensed-producers-
   medical-purposes.html
14 https://www.canada.ca/en/services/health/campaigns/introduction-cannabis-act-questions-answers.html#a3
15 In July, 2018 reports emerged that the Ontario government may allow private retailers to sell cannabis products; however the government has not
   officially announced this change.
16 http://business.financialpost.com/commodities/a-brief-look-at-provincial-approaches-to-recreational-marijuana-sales
17 https://www.reuters.com/article/canopy-growth-stake-constellation/constellation-brands-takes-stake-in-marijuana-maker-canopy-growth-idUSL4N1N545B
18 http://business.financialpost.com/business/second-cup-joins-marijuana-rush-with-plan-to-convert-some-coffee-shops-to-dispensaries
19 http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2017/61750r-eng.php
20 https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/mettrum-organigram-medical-marijuana-proposed-class-action-lawsuits/article34216937/
21 https://globalnews.ca/news/3124025/marijuana-legalization-mental-health-canada/
22 https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2018/04/16/cannabis-debate-not-enough-is-being-planned-to-protect-youth-from-effects-of-marijuana.html
You can also read