Asthma Management 2020 FOCUSED UPDATES TO THE - National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
SELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES
AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
Up-to-date figures and tables on asthma severity, control, and management
National Asthma Education
and Prevention Program
Expert Panel Report 3
2007
2020 FOCUSED UPDATES TO THE
Asthma Management
Guidelines
Updated 2021
©2021 AstraZeneca. All rights reserved. US-54130 Last Updated 6/21
1
SELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES
AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
Up-to-date figures and tables on asthma severity, control, and management
INTENDED USE OF SELECTIONS FROM THE
US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
The following tables and figures are taken directly from the US Guidelines, including the
National Asthma Education and Prevention Program’s (NAEPP) Expert Panel Report EPR-3
(2007) and 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines, and the Global
Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2021 Report without alteration of content or wording. In this
compilation, you will find key tables on asthma severity, control, and treatment management
based on the most current recommendations.
• Each image is referenced to its source
• This is not a comprehensive compilation of all US guidelines or GINA reports
• The intent of this document is to provide a quick “point-of-care” summary tool
• A complete appraisal of the provided information can be obtained by examining the full
context of the source documents
• This document applies to patients ≥12 years of age
Note: These guidelines and reports may contain scientific information about products or uses that
are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in the United States. Providing this
information does not constitute any recommendation for use nor does it imply the efficacy or safety
of any unapproved product or product use.
2SELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma
Education Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines
for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. 2007:343-345.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma
Education Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert
Panel Working Group. 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma
Management Guidelines. 2020:1-29.
Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma
Management and Prevention. 2021:7-59.
The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) published an Expert
Panel Report, EPR-3, in 2007. In 2014, the Asthma Expert Working Group of the National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council (NHLBAC) completed an assessment of the need
to revise the NAEPP’s EPR-3 and determined that a focused update on six priority topics
was warranted. In December 2020, the 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management
Guidelines was published.
The full 2020 Report is not a complete revision of the 2007 EPR-3. To better understand the
new 2020 Stepwise Approach for Management of Asthma, classification of asthma severity
from EPR-3 2007 is provided first, followed by the preferred and alternate treatment steps
recommended by the 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines.
The impairment and risk-based asthma control categories also remain unchanged from the
EPR-3 2007 report; therefore, for assessment of asthma control once therapy is initiated, the
EPR-3 2007 classification of asthma control is also provided.
3SELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education Prevention
Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of
Asthma. 2007:343-345.
FULL REPORT 2007
CLASSIFICATION OF ASTHMA SEVERITY (≥12 years of age)
COMPONENTS OF SEVERITY Persistent
Intermittent
Mild Moderate Severe
>2 days/week
Symptoms ≤2 days/week Daily Throughout the day
but not daily
Nighttime >1x/week but
≤2x/month 3-4x/month Often 7x/week
awakenings not nightly
Short-acting
>2 days/week
Impairment beta2-agonist
but not daily, and Several times
use for symptom ≤2 days/week Daily
Normal FEV 1/FVC: not more than 1x per day
control (not
on any day
8-19 yr 85% prevention of EIB)
20-39 yr 80% Interference with
None Minor limitation Some limitation Extremely limited
normal activity
40-59 yr 75%
60-80 yr 70% • Normal FEV 1
between
exacerbations
Lung function • FEV1 >80% • FEV1 >80% • FEV1 >60% but • FEV1SELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education Prevention
Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group. 2020 Focused
Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines. 2020:1-29.
THOSE 6 TOPICS INCLUDED:
The Expert Panel that produced the
1. Intermittent Inhaled Corticosteroids
2020 asthma guidelines update was 2. Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists
asked to address specific questions 3. Indoor Allergen Mitigation
about six priority topics rather than 4. Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Allergic Asthma
revise all of EPR-3.
2020 FOCUSED UPDATES TO THE 5. Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Testing
AT-A-GLANCE GUIDE
Asthma Management Guidelines
6. Bronchial Thermoplasty
In the stepwise approach
AGES 12+ YEARS: STEPWISE APPROACH FOR MANAGEMENT OF ASTHMA to therapy for asthma,
Intermittent the clinician escalates
Management of Persistent Asthma in Individuals Ages 12+ Years
Asthma treatment as needed (by
moving to a higher step)
or, if possible, de-escalates
STEP 6
STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 treatment (by moving
Treatment STEP 1
to a lower step) once the
individual’s asthma is
PRN SABA Daily low-dose ICS
and PRN SABA
Daily and PRN
combination
Daily and PRN
combination
Daily medium-high
dose ICS-LABA +
Daily high-dose
ICS-LABA +
well-controlled for at least
Preferred or
low-dose ICS- medium-dose LAMA and oral systemic 3 consecutive months.
formoterol ICS-formoterol PRN SABA corticosteroids +
PRN concomitant PRN SABA
When preparing the
ICS and SABA stepwise diagram, the
Daily LTRA* and Daily medium- Daily medium- Daily medium-high Expert Panel used some
PRN SABA dose ICS and PRN dose ICS-LABA or dose ICS-LABA
SABA daily medium-dose or daily high-dose of the definitions and
or
or
ICS + LAMA, and ICS + LTRA,* and assumptions from EPR-3.
Cromolyn,* or PRN SABA PRN SABA
Nedocromil,* or
Zileuton,* or
Daily low-dose
ICS-LABA, or daily
or According to the
Theophylline,* and low-dose ICS + Daily medium- NAEPP 2020 Updates,
PRN SABA LAMA, or daily dose ICS + LTRA,*
Alternative low-dose ICS + or daily medium-
maintenance and reliever
LTRA,* and dose ICS + therapy is recommended
PRN SABA Theophylline,* or
daily medium-dose
in 1 inhaler consisting
or
ICS + Zileuton,* of low-dose ICS and
Daily low-dose ICS and PRN SABA
+ Theophylline* or formoterol (step 3) or
Zileuton,* and medium-dose ICS and
PRN SABA
formoterol (step 4)
Steps 2–4: Conditionally recommend the use of subcutaneous Consider adding Asthma Biologics
immunotherapy as an adjunct treatment to standard pharmacotherapy (e.g., anti-IgE, anti-IL5, anti-IL5R, given as 1 to 2 puffs
in individuals ≥ 5 years of age whose asthma is controlled at the anti-IL4/IL13)**
initiation, build up, and maintenance phases of immunotherapy once or twice daily as
Assess Control maintenance and 1 to
2 puffs as needed for
• First check adherence, inhaler technique, environmental factors, and comorbid conditions.
• Step up if needed; reassess in 2–6 weeks symptoms. (Do not exceed
• Step down if possible (if asthma is well controlled for at least 3 consecutive months) 12 total puffs per day in
Consult with asthma specialist if Step 4 or higher is required. Consider consultation at Step 3. patients age ≥12 years.)
Control assessment is a key element of asthma care. This involves both impairment and risk. Use [Recommendations
of objective measures, self-reported control, and health care utilization are complementary and supporting the use
should be employed on an ongoing basis, depending on the individual’s clinical situation.
of maintenance and
Abbreviations: ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, long-acting beta2-agonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LTRA, leukotriene
reliever therapy in 1
receptor antagonist; SABA, inhaled short-acting beta2-agonist inhaler consisting of ICS/
Updated based on the 2020 guidelines. formoterol are primarily
* Cromolyn, Nedocromil, LTRAs including Zileuton and montelukast, and Theophylline were not considered for this update, and/or have limited
availability for use in the United States, and/or have an increased risk of adverse consequences and need for monitoring that make their use
based on clinical data
less desirable. The FDA issued a Boxed Warning for montelukast in March 2020. with an ICS/formoterol dry
** The AHRQ systematic reviews that informed this report did not include studies that examined the role of asthma biologics
(e.g. anti-IgE, anti-IL5, anti-IL5R, anti-IL4/IL13). Thus, this report does not contain specific recommendations for the use of biologics in asthma
powder inhaler product
in Steps 5 and 6. that is not approved or
Data on the use of LAMA therapy in individuals with severe persistent asthma (Step 6) were not included in the AHRQ systematic review and
thus no recommendation is made.
available in the United
States.]
The use of ICS-formoterol is not approved for maintenance plus rescue therapy in the United States. The recommendations for ICS-formoterol are
primarily based on clinical data evaluating the use of an ICS-formoterol formulation that is not approved and not available in the United States.
The NAEPP 2020 Focused Updates did not include new research or the US FDA approval of multiple drugs classified as asthma biologics
occurring after October 2018. NIH Publication No. 20-HL-8142
December 2020
5SELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education Prevention Program Coordinating Committee
Expert Panel Working Group. 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines. 2020:1-29.
Important aspects of care, such as asthma education (including inhaler technique) and assessment tools for
asthma control, adherence, and other factors, are not covered in the 2020 Focused Update. Reasons cited for
these limitations included lack of time, lack of resources, and, for some topics, insufficient new evidence.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education Prevention
Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of
Asthma. 2007:343-345.
The EPR-3 2007 classification of asthma control in youths ≥12 years of age and adults is shown here:
CLASSIFICATION OF ASTHMA CONTROL
COMPONENTS (≥12 years of age)
OF CONTROL Very Poorly
Well-Controlled Not Well-Controlled
Controlled
Symptoms ≤2 days/week >2 days/week Throughout the day
Nighttime awakenings ≤2x/month 1-3x/week ≥4x/week
Interference with normal
None Some limitation Extremely limited
activity
Short-acting
beta2-agonist use for
Impairment ≤2 days/week >2 days/week Several times per day
symptom control (not
prevention of EIB)
FEV1 or peak flow >80% predicted/personal best 60-80% predicted/personal bestSELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3:
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. 2007:343-345.
• At present, there are inadequate data to correspond frequencies of exacerbations with different
levels of asthma control. In general, more frequent and intense exacerbations (e.g., requiring urgent,
unscheduled care, hospitalization, or ICU admission) indicate poorer disease control. For treatment
purposes, patients who had ≥2 exacerbations requiring oral systemic corticosteroids in the past year
may be considered the same as patients who have not-well-controlled asthma, even in the absence
of impairment levels consistent with not-well-controlled asthma.
• Validated Questionnaires for the impairment domain (these questionnaires do not assess lung
function or the risk domain):
ATAQ=Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire®
ACQ=Asthma Control Questionnaire®
ACT=Asthma Control Test™
• Before step up in therapy:
‒ Review adherence to medication, inhaler technique, environmental control, and comorbid
conditions.
‒ If an alternative treatment option was used in a step, discontinue and use the preferred treatment
for that step.
‒ According to the NAEPP 2020 Updates, individuals whose asthma is uncontrolled on
maintenance ICS-LABA with SABA as quick-relief therapy should receive the preferred
maintenance and reliever therapy in 1 inhaler consisting of low-dose ICS and formoterol (step 3) or
medium-dose ICS and formoterol (step 4) given as 1 to 2 puffs once or twice daily as maintenance
and 1 to 2 puffs as needed for symptoms. (Do not exceed 12 total puffs per day in patients age
≥12 years).
Several asthma assessment tools have been validated since the EPR-3 2007 was published. A table
of select tools is provided here. (For purposes of this document, only tools that include, in full or
in part, the age range of ≥12 years are provided. Please see individual assessment tool for more
details.)
Questionnaire
Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (ACCI)1
Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ)2
Asthma APGAR (APGAR)3
Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI)4
Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI)5
RAND Asthma Control Measure (RAND-ACM)6
Royal College of Physicians 3 Questions (RCP 3 Questions)7
1. Patino CM, Okelo SO, Rand CS, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(5):936-943.e6.
2. Murphy KR, Chipps B, Beuther DA, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(7):2263-2274.e5. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.042
3. Rank MA, Bertram S, Wollan P, Yawn RA, Yawn BP. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(7):917-925.
4. Wildfire JJ, Gergen PJ, Sorkness CA, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(3):694-701.
5. Okelo SO, Eakin MN, Patino CM, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(1):55-62.
6. Lara M, Edelen MO, Eberhart NK, Stucky BD, Sherbourne CD. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(5):1243-1252.
7. Pinnock H, Burton C, Campbell S, et al. Prim Care Respir J. 2012;21(3):288-294.
7SELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Available from:
www.ginasthma.org.
Asthma Management and Prevention. 2021:7-59. Adapted from GINA 2021 Report.
The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) is a network of individuals, organizations, and public health officials who
disseminate information about the care of patients with asthma and provide a mechanism to translate scientific
evidence into improved asthma care. The GINA Report was updated in 2021 following the routine twice-yearly
cumulative review of the literature by the GINA Scientific Committee.
GINA ASSESSMENT OF ASTHMA CONTROL IN ADULTS AND ADOLESCENTS
A. Asthma symptom control Level of asthma symptom control
In the past 4 weeks, has the patient had: Well Partly Uncontrolled
controlled controlled
• Daytime asthma symptoms more than twice/week? Yes No
• Any night waking due to asthma? Yes No
None 1–2 3–4
• SABA reliever for symptoms more than twice/week?* Yes No of these of these of these
• Any activity limitation due to asthma? Yes No
B. Risk factors for poor asthma outcomes
Assess risk factors at diagnosis and periodically, particularly for patients experiencing exacerbations.
Measure FEV1 at start of treatment, after 3–6 months of controller treatment to record the patient’s personal best lung
function, then periodically for ongoing risk assessment.
Having uncontrolled asthma symptoms is an important risk factor for exacerbations.
Additional potentially modifiable risk factors for flare-ups (exacerbations), even in patients
with few symptoms† include:
• Medications: high SABA use (associated with increased risk of exacerbations and
mortality particularly if ≥1 x 200-dose canister per month); inadequate ICS: not
prescribed ICS; poor adherence; incorrect inhaler technique Having any of
• Other medical conditions: obesity; chronic rhinosinusitis; GERD; confirmed food these risk factors
allergy; pregnancy increases the
• Exposures: smoking; allergen exposure if sensitized; air pollution patient’s risk of
exacerbations
• Context: major psychological or socioeconomic problems
even if they have few
• Lung function: low FEV1, especiallySELECTIONS FROM THE US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. 2021:7-59.
STEPWISE APPROACH TO CONTROL SYMPTOMS AND MINIMIZE FUTURE RISK
Selecting initial controller treatment in adults and adolescents with a diagnosis of asthma (V1)
ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; LABA: long-acting beta2-agonist; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic antagonist; MART: maintenance and reliever therapy with ICS-formoterol; OCS: oral
corticosteroids; SABA: short-acting beta2-agonist
© 2021 Global Strategy Asthma Management and Prevention, all rights reserved. Use is by express license from the owner.
Recommendations supporting the use of maintenance and reliever therapy in 1 inhaler consisting of ICS/formoterol are primarily based on clinical
data with an ICS/formoterol dry powder inhaler product that is not approved or available in the United States.
ASTHMA SEVERITY
54 3. Treating to control symptoms and minimize future risk
Asthma severity can be assessed when the patient has been on controller treatment for several months:
• Mild asthma is asthma that is well-controlled with Step 1 or Step 2 treatment, i.e. with as-needed ICS-formoterol
alone, or with low-intensity maintenance controller treatment such as low dose ICS, leukotriene receptor
antagonists or chromones. For patients prescribed as-needed ICS-formoterol, the frequency of use that should
be considered to represent well-controlled asthma has not yet been determined.
• Moderate asthma is asthma that is well-controlled with Step 3 or Step 4 treatment e.g. low or medium dose
ICS-LABA.
• Severe asthma is asthma that remains ‘uncontrolled’ despite optimized treatment with high dose ICS-LABA,
or that requires high dose ICS-LABA to prevent it from becoming ‘uncontrolled’. While many patients with
uncontrolled asthma may be difficult to treat due to inadequate or inappropriate treatment, or persistent
problems with adherence or comorbidities such as chronic rhinosinusitis or obesity, the European Respiratory
Society/American Thoracic Society Task Force on Severe Asthma considered that the definition of severe
asthma should be reserved for patients with refractory asthma and those in whom response to treatment of
comorbidities is incomplete. See full report for more detail about the assessment of patients with difficult to
treat or severe asthma.
9and ethnicity perspectives have been associated with improved knowledge and significant improvements in inhaler
technique.161 Suggested communication strategies for reducing the impact of low health literacy are shown in Box 3-1.
PERSONALIZED CONTROL-BASED
SELECTIONS FROM THE ASTHMA MANAGEMENT
US GUIDELINES AND THE GLOBAL REPORT ON ASTHMA
Asthma control has two domains: symptom control and risk reduction (see Box 2-2, p.36). In control-based asthma
management, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment is adjusted in a continuous cycle that involves
assessment, treatment
Global andAsthma.
Initiative for reviewGlobal
by appropriately trained Management
Strategy for Asthma personnel (Box
and3-2). Asthma
Prevention. outcomes have been shown to
2021:7-59.
improve after the introduction of control-based guidelines162,163 or practical tools for implementation of control-based
management strategies.153,164 The concept of control-based management is also supported by the design of most
randomized controlled medication trials, with patients identified for a change in asthma treatment on the basis of
features ofIn
poor symptom control
control-based asthma with or without other
management, risk factors such
pharmacological as low lung function or
and non-pharmacological a history isof
treatment
exacerbations. From 2014, GINA asthma management has focused not only on asthma symptom
adjusted in a continuous cycle that involves assessment, treatment and review by appropriately control,trained
but also on
personalized management of the patient’s modifiable risk factors for exacerbations, other adverse outcomes and
personnel.
comorbidities, and taking into account the patient’s preferences and goals.
THE ASTHMA MANAGEMENT CYCLE FOR PERSONALIZED ASTHMA CARE
Box 3-2. The asthma management cycle for personalized asthma care
© 2021 Global Strategy Asthma Management and Prevention, all rights reserved. Use is by express license from the
For many patients
owner. in primary care, symptom control is a good guide to a reduced risk of exacerbations.
165
When inhaled
corticosteroids (ICS) were introduced into asthma management, large improvements were observed in symptom control
and lung function, and exacerbations and asthma-related mortality decreased.
However, with other asthma therapies (including ICS-long-acting beta2-agonists [LABA]166,167) or different treatment
regimens (such It isas as-needed
important ICS-formoterol
to note in mild and
that assessments asthma 168-171
definitions and ICS-formoterol
of asthma maintenance
control and severity, asand
wellreliever
as
therapy 172,173
), and intreatment
asthma patients with mild or severe
management asthma, there may
recommendations, may be
notdiscordance between among
always be consistent responses for symptom
various
control and exacerbations.
guidelines such as the NAEPP or GINA reports. Health care providers are encouraged to determine
the best assessment and management strategies for their patients.
46 3. Treating to control symptoms and minimize future risk
10You can also read
