RAINBOW SCORECARD - The Online Citizen
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
RAINBOW SCORECARD
Facebook: @fbSAYONI Instagram: @sayonisg Website: www.sayoni.com Email address: bravesayoni@gmail.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4 INTRODUCTION & METHEDOLOGY
5 ABSENT OR SILENT & FENCE-SITTING
POLITICIANS
6-7 GRADING EXPLANATION
8-10 TOP 5 POLITICIANS
11-13 BOTTOM 5 POLITICIANS
13-22 OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
22-25 FENCE-SITTING POLITICIANS
25 UPDATED RESPONSE FROM ABSENT
OR SILENT POLITICIANS
26 POLITICAL PARTIES AND
LGBTQ INCLUSION
27 CONCLUSION
3
INTRODUCTION
OUR persons routinely experience violence and discrimination rooted in unjust laws and policies
personal lives are inherently political. In all aspects of our private and public lives, LGBTQ
that uphold rigid gender norms, homophobia and transphobia.
All citizens should have the equal right to live free from violence and discrimination, regardless of their
sexual orientation, gender identity and/or expression. However, LGBTQ Singaporeans are systematically
discriminated against and treated as “second-class citizens”, unable to participate fully as members of
society and unworthy of the rights accorded to fellow heterosexual Singaporean citizens.
We embarked on this project to emphasise the importance of LGBTQ visibility and representation in
our political systems. Through archiving politicians’ public views on LGBTQ issues in the past 10 years,
this project aims to advocate for greater political accountability. The words and actions of our political
representatives hold power, regardless of whether they were made in Parliament or other avenues like
social media.
We recognise that citizens, including LGBTQ persons and allies, are not single-issue voters, as we do
not lead single-issue lives. However, we firmly believe it is important to take into account the positions
politicians have on LGBTQ issues. Irrespective of their political parties or affiliations, we aim to be as
non-partisan, fair, and factual as possible in sharing a snapshot of our politicians’ public views. In doing
so, we hope this enables LGBTQ Singaporeans and allies to make informed choices, in and beyond their
voting slips during elections. We encourage all to engage in active citizenry: be it writing to your MP and
urging them to speak up on LGBTQ issues, or calling out bigotry in the workplace, with friends or family.
Changes in our institutions, laws and policies are overdue and urgently needed. We believe that the
Singapore government should lead the way, in tandem with citizens and civil society organisations.
Moving forward, we hope all politicians and political parties will have open dialogues with the people
they are elected to represent: by addressing the concerns of LGBTQ citizens, ensuring the protection
and inclusion of this vulnerable group, and upholding equality as one of the foundational principles
of Singapore.
METHODOLOGY
DURING the 2011 General Elections, members of the LGBTQ community sent a joint letter to
6 political parties requesting for clarifications of their positions on LGBTQ-related
issues. Building off their advocacy efforts, we embarked on this project to track how the parliamentary
discourse and public views of politicians have evolved in the ten years since this previous request. Thus,
our scope of study was established to be a review of the past decade (2011 - 2020).
We conducted research on LGBTQ-related news or statements made by politicians. These were found on
social media, mainstream and independent news outlets, and in Parliamentary Hansard records. Following
this, we emailed politicians for clarifications and comments on their public views made in the past decade.
We also reached out to all other politicians, who were silent on LGBTQ issues between 2011 and 2020,
for comments on their current position(s).
Additionally, we emailed political parties requesting for their position(s) on issues such as Section 377A,
anti-discrimination legislation, “conversion therapy”, policies on gender marker change and transgender
healthcare, recognition of same-sex relationships, media censorship, LGBTQ-affirming healthcare, and
inclusive education.
4
ABSENT OR SILENT
POLITICIANS
OUR 10 years. While it may be politically expedient to avoid discussing “controversial” issues, the
research found that only 35 politicians have made statements on LGBTQ issues in the past
systemic violence and discrimination LGBTQ persons face means that lives are on the line. Such wilful
ignorance is to turn away from the discriminatory laws, policies, and attitudes towards LGBTQ persons
that legitimise their continued marginalization, engendering unequal access to education, employment,
healthcare, housing and public spaces.
Research conducted by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) has shown that perspectives on LGBTQ
issues evolve over time. LGBTQ issues are seen as crucial among younger respondents who tend to be
more accepting. Youths, a growing and increasingly important voting bloc, want greater government
involvement and more public discussions of LGBTQ issues.1 Now more than ever, it is imperative for
politicians to address the concerns of LGBTQ citizens openly and meaningfully.
Absence or silence ignore the challenges LGBTQ persons face as a vulnerable group, and neglects how
violence and discrimination impacts our lived realities as LGBTQ Singaporeans and our “bread-and-
butter”. As we grow as a nation, we need to be reminded that societies should be judged by how they
treat its most vulnerable citizens, and politicians have the poer and responsibility to ensure that
no one is left behind.
FENCE-SITTING POLITICIANS
OUT ofconsider
the 35 politicians who have made statements on LGBTQ issues, 8 made statements that we
to be “fence-sitting”. Fence-sitting statements take any of the following form:
Does not take an explicit or decisive stance
Uses the discourse of prevailing “social norms” or awaiting “social views to evolve”,
in order to deflect institutional responsibility
“Motherhood statements” that are vague or have a feel-good platitude, without any
specified plans for realisation
In our view, fence-sitting is not enough. Though perhaps well-intentioned, opting for “neutrality” on issues
of injustice is to support the status quo that continues to treat LGBTQ persons as unequal members of
society. While we do believe that social consensus has to be built on divisive issues, politicians hold
institutional power and thus the responsibility to effectuate change, by engaging in substantial efforts
to build inclusivity and respect diversity. More should be done to undertake such efforts, rather than
inactively sitting on the middle ground.
Our democratically elected politicians are accountable to all Singaporeans, and we hope fence-sitting
politicians will engage in more meaningful efforts to combat violence and discrimination against LGBTQ
persons in the future. We invite all politicians who currently belong in this category to move proactively in
protecting vulnerable and stigmatised communities, including LGBTQ Singaporeans. In other words: taking
a more decisive stance, with specific plans for the realisation of equality for all.
1
Rei Kurohi, “Religious reactions on LGBT could cause discomfort”, Straits Times, 30 Oct 2019, Available
from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/religious-reactions-on-lgbt-could-cause-discomfort (accessed
27 Mar 2020)
5
GRADING EXPLANATION
TABLE OF GRADED POLITICIANS
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT
LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF FINAL
POLITICIANS WITH LGBTQ
NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
SCORE
GRADE
GROUPS
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
K SHANMUGAM 5 A
TAN CHUAN JIN U ? 3.5 A
?
KENNETH
JEYARETNAM U 3.5 A
DANIEL GOH
U ? 3.5 A
PAUL TAMBYAH U ? 3.5 A
LOW YEN LING U ? ? 3 B
PRITAM SINGH ? ? ? ? 3 B
MUHAMMAD
FAISHAL IBRAHIM U ? ? 3 B
CHARLES CHONG U ? U 2.5 B
EDWIN TONG U ? ? ? ? 2 C
GRACE FU U ? ? U 2 C
GAN KIM YONG U ? ? U 2 C
AMY KHOR
U ? ? U 2 C
BAEY YAM KENG U ? ? ? U 1.5 D
S ISWARAN U U U U 1 D
LEE HSIEN LOONG U ? ? X X -1 D
ONG YE KUNG U U U X X -2 D
DESMOND LEE U X X ? X -2.5 E
CHAN CHUN SING U X X ? X -2.5 E
LIM BIOW CHUAN U X X ? X -2.5 E
YAACOB IBRAHIM U X X ? X -2.5 E
TAN CHENG BOCK U X X ? X -2.5 E
LEE BEE WAH ? X X X X -3.5 F
SYAFARIN SARIF U X X X X -4 F
VIVIAN
BALAKRISHNAN U X X X X -4 F
MUHAMAD FAISAL
ABDUL MANAP U X X X X -4 F
GOH MENG SENG U X X X X -4 F
6
GRADING EXPLANATION
LIST OF FENCE-SITTERS GRADING LEGEND
Ng Chee Meng POSITIVE SUPPORT by politicians
= 1 point
Tharman Shanmugaratnam
?
Chee Soon Juan PARTIAL SUPPORT by politicians
Indranee Rajah = 1/2 point
Lawrence Wong
Janil Puthucheary X NEGATIVE ACTION by politicians
= -1 point
Heng Swee Keat
Teo Chee Hean U NO EXPLICIT SUPPORT by politicians
= 0 point
TOP & BOTTOM 5 POLITICIANS
SCORES
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
K SHANMUGAM
TAN CHUAN JIN
KENNETH
JEYARETNAM
DANIEL GOH
PAUL TAMBYAH
LEE BEE WAH
SYAFARIN SARIF
VIVIAN
BALAKRISHNAN
MUHAMAD FAISAL
ABDUL MANAP
GOH MENG SENG
7
TOP 5 POLITICIANS
A MR K SHANMUGAM
Constituency in 2015 GE: Nee Soon GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
In Oct 2019, he commented on the amendments made to the Maintenance of Religious
Harmony Act, which explicitly protects the LGBTQ community against violence incited on
religious grounds. He said on Facebook, “everyone should feel safe in Singapore. We
will not tolerate any threats made to physical safety. No one should threaten someone
because they were LGBTQ; and likewise, no one should threaten someone else, because of
religious affiliation”.
In Oct 2019, he posted about his visit to The T Project’s shelter on Facebook, commenting
that “the transgender community faces enormous challenges. The T Project offers help to
those who have fallen through the cracks because of family issues. They provide counselling,
job opportunities and most importantly a safe space”.
In Jun 2019, he commented on an incident in London where a same-sex couple was ‘beaten
for refusing to kiss’: “Everyone, regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, must feel
safe in society. And in Singapore, I have said that government has a duty to ensure that”.
In Sep 2018, he was asked about India’s Supreme Court ruling to decriminalize
consensual gay sex. He stated that Singapore is “deeply split” on 377A, and while a “growing
minority” wants to have it repealed, “the government is in the middle…society has got to
decide which direction it wants to go. And the laws will have to keep pace with changes in
society and how society sees these issues”.
In Jun 2016, regarding the Orlando mass shooting, he stated on Facebook that “Violence
against any group and any form is not acceptable”. He added that in Singapore, “the
government will act decisively, if there is threat or violence against anyone or any group...
their race, their religion, their sexual orientation - these are not relevant in terms of the
government’s duty to protect”.
In Feb 2015, he described his discussion with Oogachaga staff members on Facebook:
“They spoke about discrimination against persons from the LGBT community, and in
particular transgender persons. They also spoke about the bullying that goes on in schools.
They also discussed some ideas on how such discrimination can be reduced, and society be
made more tolerant”.
In Nov 2012, Mr Shanmugam met up with activists from Sayoni to discuss the issues faced by
the LGBTQ community. He said that Faith Community Baptist Church pastor Lawrence Khong
had asked to meet him, following his meeting with Sayoni, and spoke with the leaders of
LoveSingapore, a network of churches, to discuss their views on the gay community.
8
TOP 5 POLITICIANS
A MR TAN CHUAN JIN
Constituency in 2015 GE: Marine Parade GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ?
In Jan 2019, he responded to the HIV registry data leak on Facebook: “Whether you are for
or against LGBT is irrelevant. For that matter, heterosexuals do contract HIV too. So please
don’t drag these issues into the fray. Treat our fellow humans as fellow humans, with dignity
and respect, care and compassion.”
In Feb 2016, in relation to “pro-rape advocate” Daryush Valizadeh’s plans to organise in
Singapore, he said: “(we) have to stand up to misogynists like him and others who come
in various forms. He is the more obvious kind and it’s easy for us to respond with disgust.
But less obvious would be those that...discriminate and ridicule those with different sexual
orientation.” He added: “We should not just say no, but to affirm our own values by making
a stand when we encounter bigotry, and to actively inculcate them in our children.”
A MR KENNETH JEYARETNAM
Secretary-General
Reform Party (RP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ?
In Feb 2019, in response to the HIV registry data leak, he wrote in a blog post stating
the fear of being on a registry makes people afraid to test for HIV, and “this fear is
compounded by the fact that Singapore criminalizes homosexuality and has no anti-
discrimination laws”. He added: “We need to abolish or anonymise the [HIV] registry and
abolish 377A, even though this will inevitably lead to howls of protest from both
fundamentalist Christians and Muslims.”
9
TOP 5 POLITICIANS
A ASSOC PROF DANIEL GOH
Workers’ Party (WP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ?
In Feb 2014, he responded to HPB’s FAQs as being “factual” and “objective”, and did
not see any contradiction between the FAQs and the government’s pro-family policy. He
added: “Informing people about homosexuals actually helps promote the family as a basic
building block of society, as it helps family members understand and accept homosexuality
as a fact. This reduces discord and strengthens bonds, making for a stronger society where
homosexuals do not feel ostracized and alienated through no fault of their own”.
A PROF PAUL TAMBYAH
Chairman
Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ?
In Aug 2015, Inconvenient Questions interviewed Prof Tambyah for his views on Section
377A in a pre-election dialogue. He said: “In terms of 377A, the SDP has been very clear
about this - that 377A should be repealed. And again, this is in line with the idea that there
should be equality for all Singaporeans.”
10BOTTOM 5 POLITICIANS
F MR GOH MENG SENG
Secretary-General
People’s Power Party (PPP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X X X
In Sep 2018, he said on Facebook that he is “agreeable to repeal 377A if and only if there
is legislation or mechanism to prevent the promotion of LGBT as a lifestyle”. He added that
“homosexuality is against natural selection” and “same sex marriage is a normalization of
an abnormality”. While “the law should not criminalize”private acts, “it is totally different to
put such sexuality up and say it is normal and since you have the right to such sex, you have
the right to same sex marriage”.
In Jun 2016, he said the Orlando mass shooting should not be seen as an attack on the
LGBTQ community, but “as stupid people doing stupid things which kills lots of people.”
He also questioned if it would have been logistically and physically possible for a lone
gunman to shoot over 100 people. He stated: “For a single gunman to take down over 100
people…is something unimaginable to me”. Referencing those who gathered for a vigil for
the victims, he questioned why Singaporeans did not show “concern big enough to go to
Hong Lim Park to protest or vigil or to “show solidarity”” for mass killings like the Tiananmen
Square massacre or wars in the Middle East. He added: “while LGBT is assertive in their rights
and wanting others to support their movement like Pink Dot … it seems to me that they are
more concerned (or just only concern[ed]) about their own community’s issues and plight.”
F MR SYAFARIN SARIF
Chairman
People’s Power Party (PPP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X X X
In Jun 2016, after the Orlando mass shooting, he shared several posts on Facebook that
suggested that the shooting was staged and fake. He also shared a YouTube video which
suggested that the media was lying to its readers about the shooting.
11BOTTOM 5 POLITICIANS
F DR VIVIAN BALAKRISHNAN
Constituency in 2015 GE: Holland-Bukit Timah GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X X X
In April 2019, he responded on Facebook to allegations made by a Singaporean who
recounted hearing him reference 377A as “silly” at a forum. He denied the allegations:
“I did not use the word ‘silly’. I think you misheard me.” He added: “We really want to avoid
the ‘culture wars’ that we see elsewhere on this issue”, and “this is not the central issue of our
time … even if we disagree, we should live and let live in mutual respect”.
In April 2011, before the General Elections’ Nomination Day, the PAP team, led by Dr
Balakrishnan, alleged that the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) was suppressing a
video showing SDP candidate Dr Vincent Wijeysingha “participating at a forum which
discussed the promotion of the gay cause in Singapore”. Although Dr Wijeysingha had
not discussed LGBTQ issues as part of his election agenda, the statement questioned his
political motivation, and asked whether he and the SDP would pursue “this cause in the
political arena”.
F MR MUHAMAD FAISAL ABDUL MANAP
Constituency in 2015 GE: Aljunied GRC
Workers’ Party (WP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X X X
In Jul 2014, he said about the Wear White campaign: “I support the movement because it’s my
responsibility to show concern for my fellow Muslims, asking them to do some introspection
on whether what they’re doing is in accordance with Islamic values.” He said he backed
the movement personally as “a Muslim individual” and that it had “nothing to do with the
party stand”, after photographs of him wearing white next to the movement’s supporters at
a mosque on the night of Pink Dot circulated on Facebook .
12BOTTOM 5 POLITICIANS
F ER DR LEE BEE WAH
Constituency in 2015 GE: Nee Soon GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
? X X X X
In Jan 2019, Er Dr Lee was particularly concerned about RuPaul’s Drag Race Show in
Singapore. She asked in Parliament about objections the Ministry of Communications and
Information had received, the approval of performances with LGBT issues, and how age
restrictions are determined.
In Dec 2018, Ready4Repeal volunteers approached her to talk about Section 377A during
a Meet-the-People session. She allegedly said, “I have other residents with real problems.”
The PAP Nee Soon South Branch responded on Facebook: “MP Lee Bee Wah spoke to
[the volunteers] briefly and moved on to speak to other residents about their issues”, and
letter-writers wrote an appeal letter for one of them after.
OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
B MS LOW YEN LING
Constituency in 2015 GE: Choa Chu Kang GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? ?
In Sep 2019, she responded to parliamentary questions on measures to combat school
bullying based on sexual orientation or gender identity/expression, saying “no bullying
of any form is tolerated at any time”, and that teachers and counsellors are given “very
extensive training”, to equip them with “strategies to address actions that are mean or
hurtful” and “manage behaviour such as those that are targeting gender identity or sexual
orientation”. She said MOE “will continue to look at how we can improve our systems and
measures to make sure that we provide a safe, secure and conducive learning environment
for all our students.”
13OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
B MR PRITAM SINGH
Constituency in 2015 GE: Aljunied GRC
Workers’ Party (WP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
? ? ? ?
In May 2019, he shared a Facebook video about Fanny Ler’s experience of being a
transgender parent, commenting: “In Singapore, one seldom learns about sexual minorities
in a formal setting. Be it in NS or in schools for example, whatever one learns about sexual
minorities in the first instance is more often than not, negative and usually derogatory.” He
added: “Life for such individuals and their families is hard, challenging and difficult - until
acceptance makes a breakthrough. We need not make it any harder for them.”
In April 2019, he reiterated the Workers’ Party’s stance on Section 377A – last made
in 2007 – to not call for a repeal, citing differing leadership views. He said: “The
conservative camp who focus on pro-family campaigns” places a “disproportionate focus
on the tangential issue of 377A”, while “the liberal camp and their right-to-love campaigns
is that they have unwittingly weaponized the concept of love for many of those in the middle,
particularly those who do not take a position on the matter”.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: In response to our query in Mar 2020 for an updated
position, he said: “1. My engagement with the LGBTQ community mainly revolves around
discussions with friends who [are] members of the community, some of whom have actively
chosen not to come out of the closet. 2. My public comments on the issue, like my 2019
speech are ultimately aimed at building bridges between those for and against a repeal of
377A. In my view, too much heat has been generated on the issue and not enough light
shed on understanding each other’s positions. 3. The WP will support legislation aimed with
a non-discrimination/non-violence component for all communities in Singapore. 4. The WP
has members/volunteers of the LGBTQ community who support us and we are grateful for
their support. I wrote a post on my Facebook page about Fanny Ler, who also volunteered
for the Party in the 2015 elections.”
14OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
B MR CHARLES CHONG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Punggol East SMC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? U
In Jan 2011, regarding Lee Kuan Yew’s comments that he had no issue with
homosexuals in Parliament, he said: “PAP candidates have never been asked to declare
our sexual orientation. MM is right in saying an MP should be judged purely on his
performance, and not on his sexual orientation”.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: In response to our query in Mar 2020 for an updated
position, Mr Chong referenced the speech he made when Parliament debated amendments
to the Penal Code in 2007, where he called for a repeal of Section 377A, and added that
his views since then have not changed.
B ASSOC PROF MUHAMMAD FAISHAL IBRAHIM
Constituency in 2015 GE: Nee Soon GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? ?
In Mar 2020, in response to parliamentary questions on domestic violence against
LGBTQ persons, he said that the Government takes a clear stance: “Violence against any
person – LGBTQ or not – should not be condoned”. He added that “social services must be
accessible to all, without discrimination” and that he has spoken to Family Violence Specialist
Centres that have supported LGBTQ persons who faced violence after coming out. He urged
social service providers to strengthen their capacities in supporting all victims with empathy
and sensitivity.
15OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
C MS GRACE FU
Constituency in 2015 GE: Yuhua SMC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? ? U
In Mar 2020, in response to questions in Parliament on fostering mutual understanding on
LGBTQ issues, she said that we should “not shy away from discussing it and it is important
that we have platforms where we can engage on our differences on the basis of mutual
respect”. She added that MCCY “will continue to support partners and agencies to build
capacity and capabilities within the community for more inclusive civil discourse.”
C MR GAN KIM YONG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Choa Chu Kang GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? ? U
In Aug 2019, in response to questions in Parliament on mental healthcare for LGBTQ persons,
he stated that “public mental health services are available to all Singaporeans irrespective
of gender identity” and healthcare providers are “trained to support [LGBTQ] persons with
empathy, sensitivity and due consideration of their specific care needs”.
In Feb 2014, he said HPB’s FAQs do not encourage same-sex relationships, and instead
provide a one-stop resource of factual information on sexuality. He added: “The statement
“A same-sex relationship is not too different from a heterosexual relationship” and the
statement that follows “Both require the commitment of two people” should be taken
together. They highlight that relationships require commitment, and it is possible to remain
faithful to one’s partner regardless of one’s sexual orientation.”
16OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
C DR AMY KHOR
Constituency in 2015 GE: Hong Kah North SMC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? ? U
In Mar 2020, in response to parliamentary questions on mental healthcare for LGBTQ
persons, she said, “healthcare providers who are caring for all persons with mental health
conditions, are trained and they are supposed to provide these patients with empathy,
sensitivity and due consideration to their specific care needs as well as risk factors”. She
added that the Gender Care Clinic provides treatment for persons experiencing emotional
difficulties pertaining to gender identity.
C MR EDWIN TONG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Marine Parade GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? ? ? ?
In May 2019, Mr Tong spoke on behalf of the Minister for Law during the reading of
the Protection from Harassment (Amendment) Bill. He addressed the need to tackle online
harassment, highlighting the vulnerabilities of LGBT youths: “LGBT teens are at five times
more at risk of being abused on Facebook than non-LGBT teens”.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: In response to our query in Mar 2020 for an updated
position, he replied, “I am sorry that I will not be able to participate in this discourse, at this
time”.
17OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
D MR LEE HSIEN LOONG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Ang Mo Kio GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? ? X X
In Jun 2019, an audience member in the Smart Nation Summit asked if Singapore would
support workforce diversity, including the LGBTQ community. PM Lee replied: “You know
our rules in Singapore. Whatever your sexual orientation, you are welcome to come and
work in Singapore”, though Section 377A remains. He added: “This has not inhibited
people from living, and has not stopped Pink Dot from having a gathering every year.”
In Feb 2017, during a BBC HARDtalk interview, PM Lee was asked if his stance on 377A
would be different if his children were gay. He replied that removing the law would not
remove homophobia. When pressed for his personal stance on LGBTQ issues, PM Lee said,
“If I don’t have a problem — this is an uneasy compromise — I’m prepared to live with it until
social attitudes change.”
In Jun 2015, PM Lee said he does not think Singapore is ready for same-sex marriage, as
society is still conservative. “We do not harass or discriminate against them,” he added,
“There is space for the gay community but they should not push the agenda too hard
because…there will be a very strong pushback. Where we are I think is not a bad place
to be”.
D MR ONG YE KUNG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Sembawang GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U U U X X
In Sep 2018, an audience member at the Singapore Summit asked him how Singapore can
be more inclusive towards LGBTQ individuals. He replied: “The fact is they live in Singapore
peacefully, no discrimination at work, housing [and] education. They go about their lives.”
He added: “However, on the issue of LGBTQ, it is also an issue of social mores and societal
values”, and that “some things we leave it to society to decide over time.”
18OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
D MR S ISWARAN
Constituency in 2015 GE: West Coast GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U U U U
In Dec 2018, Ready4Repeal volunteers met with him during a Meet-the-People session to
discuss 377A. They expressed their gratitude to him on Facebook: “We were very grateful
that he took time out of his MPS - almost an hour - to hear our concerns and discuss matters
such as bullying, education, engagement and dialogue”.
D MR BAEY YAM KENG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Tampines GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U ? ? ? U
In Nov 2016, he was asked about the censorship of a same-sex kiss in the Singapore
staging of Les Miserables. He replied that youths may be more accepting, whereas one’s
stance on homosexuality changes with age and having children, as “a parent might feel
uncomfortable” explaining a same-sex kiss to a child. “I know I can speak for fellow
parents, that we are typically ill prepared to discuss matters of a sexual nature, even
pertaining to mainstream lifestyles.”
In Jul 2014, the National Library Board moved children’s books depicting LGBTQ families
to the adult section instead of pulping them. He commented, “parents must be the ones to
decide what books their children read, and what values their children should have. The
government can provide the access and choices, but the responsibility cannot be outsourced
to the government.”
In Feb 2014, he reacted to the Health Promotion Board’s decision to post an FAQ
section on sexuality on its website, saying “It’s a bit bold of them to take this approach.” He
added: “[The] point about the differences between same-sex and heterosexual relationships,
I felt that the answer lacked another dimension, which is about the Asian values of family,”
adding that social norms, such as how same-sex couples are unable to marry in Singapore,
could have been reflected too.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: In response to our query in Mar 2020 for an updated
position, he replied that he stands by the comments he has made on record.
19OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
E MR DESMOND LEE
Constituency in 2015 GE: Jurong GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X ? X
In Aug 2019, in response to questions in Parliament on domestic violence against LGBTQ
people, he said MSF does not tolerate violence, regardless of gender or sexual orientation:
“The Penal Code criminalises violence and the use of force against all persons, including
LGBTQ persons”, and “our institutions and social workers are trained to be sensitive to the
diverse needs of victims of violence, including those of LGBTQ persons”.
In Jan 2019, after the High Court granted a gay man to adopt his biological child born via
surrogacy, he said in Parliament: “LGBT persons have a place here in Singapore and are
entitled to their own private lives”. However, MSF will review “adoption laws and
practices to see how they should...better reflect public policy”, which “[does] not support the
formation of family units with children and homosexual parents”.
In Oct 2018, when asked about Section 377A at an Institute of Policy Studies conference on
diversity, he commented that the issue is deeply divisive and its resolution is in the hands of
future generations. He said, “Our children must decide for themselves”.
E MR LIM BIOW CHUAN
Constituency in 2015 GE: Mountbatten SMC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X ? X
In Feb 2014, he was “disappointed” at HPB’s FAQs website. He filed a parliamentary
question asking the Minister for Health to explain why HPB “promotes a same-sex
relationship as not being different from a heterosexual relationship”, and used Facebook
to voice his disagreement. Later, he said on Facebook that “no one has been persecuted
for their gay lifestyle”. While he “[does] not agree with the practice of homosexuality”,
he urged all “not to condemn or use hateful words against homosexuals who have chosen
their way”.
20OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
E DR YAACOB IBRAHIM
Constituency in 2015 GE: Jalan Besar GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X ? X
In Jul 2014, Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, Minister for Communications and Information, answered
parliamentary questions on the prohibition of A-Mei’s song, ‘Rainbow’, during her concert.
He said A-Mei had encouraged fans to show affection for their same-sex partners during a
rendition of ‘Rainbow’ in a previous concert. With images of couples kissing projected on
screen, “taken as a whole, this segment of the show promoted a pro-LGBT message”.
In Jun 2014, after the Wear White campaign launch and the Islamic Religious Council of
Singapore (MUIS) issued guidelines to mosques on addressing LGBT issues, he said: “We
live in a multicultural society where there are bound to be differences in opinion and people
have their own choices. We respect that.” He added it is important Singapore’s mosques
remain a neutral religious platform and is “there to serve the Muslim community of all
shades”.
E DR TAN CHENG BOCK
Secretary-General
Progress Singapore Party (PSP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X ? X
In Oct 2018, during a talk at Yale-NUS, an audience member questioned Dr Tan on his
position on 377A. He said that he accepted homosexuality but that he did not want
“their lifestyle” to be “imposed on [him]”. A follow-up question about equal access to
opportunities for the LGBTQ community prompted him to say he “can’t change people’s
prejudices”. He eventually changed his stance to say that he did not support the
criminalization of homosexuals.
21OTHER GRADED POLITICIANS
E MR CHAN CHUN SING
Constituency in 2015 GE: Tanjong Pagar GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF ADVOCATE FOR NON DEMONSTRATES
ENGAGEMENT WITH LGBTQ ISSUES -DISCRIMINATION/ AWARENESS OF
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ CHALLENGES
U X X ? X
In Sep 2016, Mr Chan offered his views on LGBTQ issues at a polytechnic dialogue. He
said, “I’m not going to discriminate…[You’re free to do] whatever you do behind your
bedroom doors ... It’s not my problem. I’m not a sex policeman...But if you tell everyone to
champion pro-LGBT or anti-LGBT [causes], it [might] cause social divisions, so [I have to step
in] to be the policeman in the middle.”
In May 2014, Goldman Sachs organised a networking dinner for LGBTQ students in
Singapore. In a Facebook post, he called for foreign companies to “respect local
culture and context”, stating that while discrimination has “no place in our society”, foreign
companies “should not venture into public advocacy for causes that sow discord
amongst Singaporeans”.
FENCE-SITTING POLITICIANS
MR NG CHEE MENG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF DEMONSTRATES
ADVOCATE FOR NON
LGBTQ ISSUES AWARENESS/
ENGAGEMENT WITH -DISCRIMINATION/
UNDERSTANDING
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE
OF LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ
CHALLENGES
FENCE-SITTER
In Jan 2016, audience members at the Singapore Perspectives conference asked him about
the government’s stance on LGBTQ issues. He replied, “the space for consensus building in
this is small because the viewpoints are quite opposed”. He added: “The best way forward
is to allow [society] to evolve…whether over time we will find new equilibriums that society
at large accepts.”
22FENCE-SITTING POLITICIANS
MR THARMAN SHANMUGARATNAM
Constituency in 2015 GE: Jurong GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF DEMONSTRATES
ADVOCATE FOR NON
LGBTQ ISSUES AWARENESS/
ENGAGEMENT WITH -DISCRIMINATION/
UNDERSTANDING
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE
OF LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ
CHALLENGES
FENCE-SITTER
In Jun 2014, he responded to the launch of the Wear White campaign, saying, “in matters
of religion and personal preferences”, people have to “exercise a sense of balance and
restraint”.
DR CHEE SOON JUAN
Secretary-General
Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF DEMONSTRATES
ADVOCATE FOR NON
LGBTQ ISSUES AWARENESS/
ENGAGEMENT WITH -DISCRIMINATION/
UNDERSTANDING
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE
OF LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ
CHALLENGES
FENCE-SITTER
In Jul 2013, he issued a statement: “Homosexuality is a complex issue modern society must
deal with. No one is going to be able to wish away the LGBT community or pretend it doesn’t
exist”. He added: “However, the gay community must understand the sensitivities of those
who cannot yet accept an alternative to traditional sexual orientation”. He concluded: “It
will take patient dialogue from both sides of the divide. But until we do, let us not be mired
in confrontation and impatience. Instead, let us find a way to resolve our differences in love
and understanding.”
MS INDRANEE RAJAH
Constituency in 2015 GE: Tanjong Pagar GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF DEMONSTRATES
ADVOCATE FOR NON
LGBTQ ISSUES AWARENESS/
ENGAGEMENT WITH -DISCRIMINATION/
UNDERSTANDING
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE
OF LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ
CHALLENGES
FENCE-SITTER
In Nov 2019, she responded to parliamentary questions on MOE’s stance on LGBTQ
speakers and performers at institutes of higher learning (IHLs), saying IHLs should be
“respectful of Singapore’s wider social norms and laws, and exercise judgement and
sensitivity when dealing with potentially socially divisive issues”. She said decisions to censor
LGBTQ+ speakers and performers “should not be made on personal views”, and IHLs should
exercise discretion “from the viewpoint that this is common space”.
23FENCE-SITTING POLITICIANS
MR LAWRENCE WONG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF DEMONSTRATES
ADVOCATE FOR NON
LGBTQ ISSUES AWARENESS/
ENGAGEMENT WITH -DISCRIMINATION/
UNDERSTANDING
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE
OF LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ
CHALLENGES
FENCE-SITTER
In Sep 2012 during a Channel News Asia interview, he was asked about the government’s
role in protecting the LGBTQ community. He replied: “We should respect the consensus of
society but I think it’s also important that we respect every individual and treat each
individual with dignity...regardless of one’s beliefs, regardless of...the behaviours or the
preferences of a particular community or individual”.
DR JANIL PUTHUCHEARY
Constituency in 2015 GE: Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF DEMONSTRATES
ADVOCATE FOR NON
LGBTQ ISSUES AWARENESS/
ENGAGEMENT WITH -DISCRIMINATION/
UNDERSTANDING
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE
OF LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ
CHALLENGES
FENCE-SITTER
In Oct 2018, during a Institute of Policy Studies panel, an audience member said that the
LGBTQ community lacks mainstream media representation, which inhibits constructive
dialogue. He said citizens must be able to engage in constructive dialogue in person before
the media addresses such topics. “I don’t know that we are there yet,” he said, as LGBTQ
issues have been polarising and the broad middle ground “is not ready to engage”, so this
will take “more time and effort”.
MR HENG SWEE KEAT
Constituency in 2015 GE: Tampines GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF DEMONSTRATES
ADVOCATE FOR NON
LGBTQ ISSUES AWARENESS/
ENGAGEMENT WITH -DISCRIMINATION/
UNDERSTANDING
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE
OF LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ
CHALLENGES
FENCE-SITTER
In Jan 2020, an audience member in the Singapore Perspectives conference commented on
the lack of LGBTQ rights in Singapore. He replied, “there is no consensus on the issue of
abolishing Section 377A”. He added: “It is for us to build that social consensus. And over
time, views may evolve. But what is important is not for groups to go on the confrontation,
because when we do, then I think the views will be even more polarised.”
24FENCE-SITTING POLITICIANS
MR TEO CHEE HEAN
Constituency in 2015 GE: Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
AFFIRMATIVE INCLUSION OF DEMONSTRATES
ADVOCATE FOR NON
LGBTQ ISSUES AWARENESS/
ENGAGEMENT WITH -DISCRIMINATION/
UNDERSTANDING
LGBTQ GROUPS NON-VIOLENCE
OF LGBTQ-SPECIFIC
CONSISTENCY FREQUENCY TOWARDS LGBTQ
CHALLENGES
FENCE-SITTER
In Jun 2016, he responded to the Orlando mass shooting in a Facebook post: “Let us
treasure the peace and harmony we enjoy in Singapore, and focus on the common humanity
we share, rather than allow those with bad motives to divide us or create conflict”.
UPDATED RESPONSE FROM
ABSENT OR SILENT POLITICIANS
MR GOH CHOK TONG
Constituency in 2015 GE: Marine Parade GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
We were unable to find LGBTQ-related statements made by Mr Goh in
the past decade. In response to our email for comments or updates on his
position, we were referred to his interview with Time magazine in 2003.
He told the magazine that “in the past, if we know you’re gay, we would
not employ you. But we just changed this quietly”. He added, “we are
born this way and they [LGBTQ people] are born that way, but they are
like you and me”.
MR ZAINAL BIN SAPARI
Constituency in 2015 GE: Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC
People’s Action Party (PAP)
We were unable to find LGBTQ-related statements made by Mr Zainal
Bin Sapari in the past decade. In response to our email for comments or
updates on his position, he replied that he is a Muslim and takes reference
from MUIS’s advisory on LGBTQ-related issues, which states: “we do not
agree nor approve the pervasiveness of the LGBT lifestyle, and we cannot
agree to the efforts in promoting such a lifestyle”.
25POLITICAL PARTIES AND
LGBTQ INCLUSION
WE various
emailed 11 political parties a set of 12 questions requesting for their current position(s) on
LGBTQ issues such as Section 377A, anti-discrimination legislation, “conversion
therapy”, policies on gender marker change and transgender healthcare, recognition of same-sex
relationships, media censorship, LGBTQ-affirming healthcare, and inclusive education.
These political parties are:
1. People’s Action Party (PAP)
2. Workers’ Party (WP)
3. Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)
4. Reform Party (RP)
5. People’s Power Party (PPP)
6. Progress Singapore Party (PSP)
7. Singapore People’s Party (SPP)
8. National Solidarity Party (NSP)
9. Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA)
10. People’s Voice Party (PVP)
11. Singaporeans First (SingFirst)
Only one party, the Workers’ Party (WP), replied, although they did not respond to our specific set of
questions. They reiterated the position put forth by Secretary-General Pritam Singh’s speech during the
NUS Political Association Forum in 2019, where he stated that the WP would not be calling for the repeal
of 377A due to a lack of consensus within the party’s central executive committee. In the speech, he stated
that the WP is “against hate, especially when it is enacted in speech and action against people for their
race, religion, gender, class, disabilities, sexual orientation and so on”. However, the WP “will not turn
Section 377A into a political issue” and “will not participate in the culture war over LGBT issues because
this is prejudicial to the common good of our society”.
The lack of response from political parties highlights how LGBTQ citizens cannot depend on party politics
to represent their interests. Political parties choose the politically expedient option of following the dogma
of majority rule when canvassing for votes, causing them to pursue the interests of a majority they perceive
to be “conservative”, at the expense of minority groups. Furthermore, as our scorecards of individual
politicians have shown, politicians themselves have largely differing views on LGBTQ issues even within a
single party.
Nevertheless, this reiterates the accountability of individual politicians to the constituents they are
elected to represent, regardless of party affiliation. As Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Assoc
Prof Walter Theseira astutely noted, “the fact that in our political system, nobody who’s elected would feel
2
comfortable bringing up [LGBTQ] issues, I think it’s a problem for representation”. Singapore’s system of
representative democracy means citizens vote for politicians to represent them in Parliament, make laws
and develop policies on their behalf. Simply put, elected officials have a duty to speak for all persons
in their constituencies, including LGBTQ citizens. We emphasize our call for individual politicians to rise
above the current political climate, be more representative and inclusive, and take the lead in trailblazing
a more just and equal society.
2
Ang Hwee Min and Rachel Phua, “For Nominated Members of Parliament, it’s not just about talking
in Parliament”, Channel News Asia, 23 Feb 2020, Available from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/
news/singapore/singapore-nominated-members-of-parliament-sessions-questions-12430120 (accessed 27
Mar 2020)
26CONCLUSION
“Violence against any person – LGBTQ
or not – should not be condoned.”
“Many Singaporean Christians and
Muslims believe homosexual be- Magenta = use of hateful or
“The LGBTQ+ community should be considered a derogatory language
vulnerable group in mental healthcare.” haviour is offensive to their ideals
of what the public space and family Brownish-red = framing of LGBTQ
should be. This is not the time to as a threat to the "family"
debate these views.”
Red = framing LGBTQ
as a political "agenda"
“It is possible to remain faithful to one’s partner,
regardless of one’s sexual orientation.” Pink = framing being LGBTQ
“Public mental health services
as a "lifestyle"
are available to all Singaporeans
irrespective of gender identity.” Orange = Fence-sitting
statements
Yellow = Sweeping statements
“Whether pro or opposing LGBT,
is a matter for Singaporeans to decide.” but do not acknowledge
acknoledge speciÞc
specific
challenges and lived realities
Light green = call to take a
“Encouraging homosexuality “We do not want the homosexual lifestyle
secular view when dealing with
will undermine the traditional to be promoted or celebrated. “ LGBTQ issues
family institution and weaken
our social fabric. “ Green = demonstrate factual,
“By promoting homosexuality, we are effectively unbiased understanding of
initiating a shift in the definition of the family unit.“ LGBTQ identities
Dark green = framing of LGBTQ
“Pupils are taught... “Homosexuals should not set the tone
as a vulnerable group that
the difference between needs protection
for mainstream society.“ “We do not support the
homosexuality and
formation of family units
“sissy”/”tomboy”
with children and
behaviour.” “Anal-penetrative sex is inherently damaging to homosexual parents.“
the body and a misuse of organs, like shoving a
straw up your nose to drink.”
RELEASE OF
SAYONI’S REPORT
AS the chart illustrates, there have been incremental changes in how LGBTQ issues are addressed in
Parliament since 2004. In recent years, the LGBTQ community has been increasingly framed as a
vulnerable group that needs protection. This is in part due to the evolving realities over time as well as the
resilience of many LGBTQ activists, community groups, and allies who continue to tirelessly advocate for
the protection, advancement, and inclusion of LGBTQ rights.
We also believe that research-based advocacy, such as our report, Violence and Discrimination against
LBTQ Women in Singapore (2018), has enabled us to directly and indirectly influence the discourse on
LGBTQ issues in Singapore. It has provided us with evidence to substantiate our calls for change, for
instance, through our engagement with parliamentarians to address LGBTQ issues during parliamentary
questions and debates.
However, we recognise there is much more to be done in opening dialogues on LGBTQ issues and
meaningfully addressing them. The scoring system we designed in this project is not intended to
reductively label someone as an “ally” or “enemy”. Rather, it is a call for accountability intended to
highlight the room for improvement amongst all politicians; improvement that can be achieved through
engagement with LGBTQ community groups, consistent calls for affirmative inclusion, advocating against
violence and discrimination, and understanding the specific challenges we face as a vulnerable group. It
is a reminder that our elected representatives have a duty to represent the interests of their constituents,
including LGBTQ citizens, in order to make Singapore a home for all its people.
27Sayoni is a community of queer women, including lesbian, bisexual, and transgender women, who organise and advocate for equality in wellbeing and dignity, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics.
You can also read
