Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey 2018 Summary and Overview of Revisions

Page created by Craig Rice
 
CONTINUE READING
Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey 2018 Summary and Overview of Revisions
Standards for Soil Erosion and
Sediment Control in New Jersey
2018 Summary and Overview of
         Revisions
Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey 2018 Summary and Overview of Revisions
Staff and Presenters

David Reilly, District Manager             Michael Kent, Assistant Manager

Glenn Ward, Site Inspector III            Marie Rogowski, Administrative
                                                            Assistant II
Celia Rodrigues, Agriculture Conservation Specialist

  Frank Minch , NJ Department of Agriculture
                Executive Secretary, State Soil Conservation Committee

  John Showler, P.E., NJ Department of Agriculture
                      State Erosion Control Engineer
Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey 2018 Summary and Overview of Revisions
Frank Minch
        New Jersey Department of Agriculture
Executive Secretary, State Soil Conservation Committee
Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey 2018 Summary and Overview of Revisions
State of New Jersey Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Act, P.L.
          1975, Chapter 251 , N.J.S.A. 4:24‐39 et seq.

                          On January 31, 1976, the State of New
                           Jersey approved the “Soil Erosion and
                           Sediment Control Act, P.L. Chapter 251”.

                          This is a Statewide program to reduce the
                           danger from stormwater runoff, to retard
                           nonpoint source pollution, and to conserve
                           and protect the environmental resources
                           of the State.

                          Developers disturbing more than 5,000
                           square feet of land are required to obtain a
                           soil erosion and sediment control plan
                           certification and to implement measures
                           at construction sites to address erosion and
                           sedimentation problems.
State Soil
             Conservation Committee
                 Responsibilities

   Promulgate Program Rules
   Establish Policy/Procedures
   Adopt Technical Standards
   Provide Technical Training
   Approve District Fee Schedules
   Conduct Appeals and Render Decisions
   Establish Agreements with any Public Agency
What is a Soil Conservation District
 Districts are special purpose subdivisions of the New Jersey
  Department of Agriculture
 Semi‐autonomous political bodies which are locally
  governed
 Serve a regulatory role by implementing the State’s erosion
  control laws on construction and development sites
 Districts conduct inspections of construction sites and have
  a variety of regulatory and enforcement powers to ensure
  that construction sites are maintained in compliance with
  the certified erosion control plan
New Jersey Soil Restoration Act
       P.L. 2010, Chapter 113
 2010 – NJ Legislature amended Chapter 251 to require the
  addition of ‘soil restoration’ practices to the Standards for
  Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey.

 "Plan" means a scheme which indicates land treatment
  measures, including a schedule of the timing for their
  installation, to minimize soil erosion and sedimentation,
  and which specifies the soil restoration
   measures, consistent with the standards established
   by the committee pursuant to section 2 of P.L.2010, c.113
  (C.4:24‐42.1).
Michael Kent
        Assistant Manager
Cape Atlantic Conservation District
Application Process
1) Completed Application Form
2) Ownership Disclosure Affidavit (if Applicable)
3) One set of Sealed Plans
4) Hydrologic and Hydrology Report (if Applicable)
5) Completed Database Summary Form (if Applicable)
6) Appropriate Fee
7) 5G3 Permit for all Projects 1 Acre and Over
8) Digital Copy of Plan
Updated Forms

   Application
Updated Forms (cont.)

 Ownership
  Disclosure
  Affidavit
Updated Forms (cont)
 Minimum Requirements Form
John Showler, P.E.
    NJ Department of Agriculture
   State Erosion Control Engineer
The Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment
          Control in New Jersey

                      The Standards are a blend
                      of agronomic science,
                      (vegetative standards), and
                      state of the art engineering,
                      (engineering standards),
                      embodied in 32 individual
                      design chapters and
                      detailed appendices
Revised Soil Erosion Standards

              The Standards for Soil Erosion and
              Sediment Control in New Jersey
              7th Edition, January 2014,
              Revised July 2017
Topsoiling and Land Grading
               Standards

Revisions to the Standard for
 Topsoiling (Chapter 8) and
   the Standard for Land
    Grading (Chapter 19)
     went into effect on
 December 7th, 2017 with the
   re‐adoption of the Soil
   Erosion and Sediment
   Control Act And Rules
Soil Restoration –
         Topsoiling Chapter 8
 5” depth required (was 5” recommended)
 Must be ‘firmed in place’
 Imported topsoil must have 2.75% organic matter
 content (no change)

                                                    17
Standard for
 Topsoiling
  Chapter 8
Soil Restoration –
      Land Grading Chapter 19
    More extensive changes
   Areas of exclusion added
   Added table of maximum (not optimum) bulk density
   Added options to test soil for density
   Added requirement to depict areas on plans
   Added requirement to de‐compact in lieu of testing or
    as a result of test failure.

                                                       19
Revised Standard
for Land Grading
Section 19 (cont)
Changes to Land Grading…
 List of “exclusion areas” –
  – 20’ from basements, 12’ from crawl spaces
  – Under pavement
  – Regulated by other design requirements
     • Septic systems
     • Golf courses, soccer fields, airports etc.
     • Site Remediation
      • Brownfields
   – Not required if restoration area is
           500 sq feet or less.
                                                    21
Example of a “Soil Restoration Plan” for a Subdivision

                                                    Outer limits of
                                                       potential
                                                   restoration area
                                                      defined by
                                                    normal limits
                                                   of disturbance.

Inner limits defined by buffers
                                                                22
      around structures
L.O.D.

      Around
   buildings 20’
  basements, 12’
   crawl spaces.

                   23
Test locations @ 2
tests per acre , evenly
 distributed in ‘open
         space’

                          24
Typical Detail Provided on plan 2 tests per acre.   Note. For areas that are less than
(illustrative purposes; please do not copy.         1 acre, the test location density
This is someone else’s work used                    is a minimum of 2 tests.
 with permission)                                                                        25
Image Courtesy of HDG2, Engineering, Land Surveying, Environmental Consulting
Typical Single Family Site Plan‐ Large Lot

            1.65
          Acres of
           open
           space
Commercial Site Plan
www.capeatlantic.org

www.nj.gov/agriculture/divisions/anr/nrc/njerosion.html
Michael Kent
        Assistant Manager
Cape Atlantic Conservation District
Typical Notes and General Details
   to be Included on the Plan

                   Subgrade Soils
                   Areas Subject to Compaction
                    Graphically Denoted
                   Compaction Testing Locations
                   Compaction Testing Methods
                   Mitigation Before Topsoil Placement
                   Restoration of Compacted Soils
                   Sequence of Construction

                                                     31
Testing Options
 Options to perform soil compaction test
   • Simple wire probe test using 15.5 ga steel wire
     (survey flag)
   • Penetrometer
   • Tube Bulk Density test
   • Nuclear Densitometer
   • Can start with a simple test, and if unsatisfactory, can
     move up to more complex and reliable tests.
 Tests performed by the applicant or their agent.
 A minimum of two tests per acre are required.

                                                                32
1. Wire probe test
 Firm wire (15‐1/2 gauge steel wire ‐ e.g. survey
   marker flag, etc.)
 18 to 21 inches in length
 6” inches from one end visibly marked on the wire.
 Holding the wire flag near the flag end
 Push it vertically into the soil to the lesser of a
  6 inch depth or the depth at which it bends due to
  resistance in the soil.
 Record the depth at which it bends/deforms due to
  resistance in the soil
                                                   33
1. Wire probe test (Cont)
• Pass = Penetrate without bending or deforming at
  least 6” into the ground by hand
• If penetration fails and an obstruction is suspected
  (rocks, root, debris, etc.) the test can be repeated in
  the same general area.
• Fail = Wire is difficult to insert (wire bends or
  deforms prior to reaching 6 inches in depth) the soil
  may be excessively compacted and compaction
  mitigation or further testing via handheld soil
  penetrometer, tube bulk density, or nuclear density
  method may be performed, the choice of which is at
  the contractor/owner’s discretion.
                                                            34
1. Wire probe test (cont)

                            35
2. Penetrometer test
 Penetrometers are devices used to
  measure the resistance of a soil to
  penetration
 Pass = A result of less than or equal
  to 300 psi at 6 inches
 Fail = A result greater than 300 psi
  the soil may be excessively
  compacted and compaction
  mitigation or further testing via
  tube bulk density or nuclear
  density method may be performed,
  the choice of which is at the
  contractor/owner’s discretion.          Photo : Steve Yergeau, Rutgers
                                          Cooperative Extension of Ocean &
                                  36
                                          Atlantic Counties
                                                                       36
2. Penetrometer test (cont)

               37
                              37
3. Tube Bulk Density Test
 This test shall be certified by a New Jersey
  Licensed Professional Engineer
 Utilizing only undisturbed samples
  (reconstitution of the sample not permitted)
 Procedure for Soil Bulk Density Tests as
  described in the USDA NRCS Soil Quality Test
  Kit Guide, Section I, Chapter 4, pp. 9 – 13
 Pass = A result at or below maximum dry bulk
  density in preceding table
 Fail = A result greater than the maximum dry
  bulk density permitted in preceding table and
  compaction mitigation is required

                                                  38
4. Nuclear density test
 This test shall be certified by a New Jersey Licensed
 Professional Engineer and conducted by a nuclear
 gauge certified inspector pursuant to ASTM D6938
 Pass = A result at or below maximum dry bulk
 density in preceding table
 Fail = A result greater than the maximum dry bulk
 density permitted in preceding table and
 compaction mitigation is required
 Portable device which uses radiation to measure
  soil bulk density and soil moisture.
                                                     39
Soil Test
Method
Options
Procedures for
      Soil
 Compaction
   Mitigation
       &
  Installation
Requirements
John Showler, P.E.
    NJ Department of Agriculture
   State Erosion Control Engineer
Offsite Stability (Chapter 21‐1)
  Reorganized text to ‘flow’ more logically
  Added criteria for infiltration:
     Ok to use for reductions (redundancy)
     Not ok for point discharge stability (different criteria)
  Not intended to assess discharging to Ag fields; don’t use it for this condition
  Added option to use multiple outlets (for point discharge stability peak flow)
  Removed velocity from Table 21‐1 since the primary criteria are slope, soils and veg

Point of Discharge Stability Analysis

When infiltration practices are proposed, an alternate analysis (failure analysis) must be provided which ignores
infiltration (no dead storage volume available, no static or dynamic infiltration loss rates in the routing calculations,
etc) and demonstrates that no erosion will occur at the point of discharge if infiltration fails to function. Flow rates
based solely upon basin inlet and outlet hydraulics must be used in comparison to table 21-1 (below) to document a
stable outlet.

Downstream (off-site) Stability Analysis.

Infiltration may be used to meet peak flow reduction requirements (outlined below) for the purposes of documenting
stability of the downstream receiving channel, provided that the complete loss of infiltration function does not result
in an increase in peak flow values above the predevelopment levels..
Offsite Stability Flow Chart
Offsite Stability (Table 21‐1)
             Table 21‐1 Non‐Erosive Conditions for Point Discharges
                         Maximum Stable Slope for Point Discharges
                                    for Various Soils

     Soil Type                                        Perennial, Natural Vegetation
                                                                                      Velocity removed since
                                                          Maximum Slope (%)
                                                                                      Slope, soil and vegetation
 Sands                                                               1.8              are the primary criteria.
 Sandy loam                                                          2.0
 Silt loam, loam                                                     2.5
 Sandy clay loam                                                     3.5
 Clay loam                                                           5.0
 Graded loam to gravel                                               8.0

Stability Criteria (in conjunction with table 21‐1)

i. The maximum discharge rate shall be 10 cfs or less for the twenty‐five (25) year storm.
ii. Multiple outlets may be utilized to reduce individual outlet flow rates to levels below the
     thresholds noted above. Outlets should be spaced no closer than 50 ft horizontally to avoid
     re‐mixing of flows
iii. Flow over the outlet area shall be less than 0.5 cfs/ft. Designers shall not design excessive widths
     which will cause flows to concentrate.
iv. Conduit outlet protection shall be provided in accordance with that Standard and may include: flat
     aprons, preformed scour holes, impact basins, stilling wells, plunge pools, etc. Level spreaders are
     not an acceptable design
Michael Kent
        Assistant Manager
Cape Atlantic Conservation District
Reports of Compliance
 4 types of compliance can be issued:

       1. Report of Compliance with Conditions (CRC)
          if the project is not yet in full compliance
       2. Winter Report of Compliance with Conditions
          if the project is not yet in full compliance
       3. Report of Compliance (ROC) for projects or
          portions of a project that is in full compliance
       4. Final Report of Compliance (FROC) for
          projects that are in full and complete compliance
Soil Compaction Mitigation Verification Form

 Must be filled out
completely and
submitted to the Soil
Conservation District
prior to the District
performing a Report of
Compliance inspection
John Showler, P.E.
    NJ Department of Agriculture
    State Erosion Control Engineer
New Jersey Department of Agriculture
Hydrologic Modeling Data Summary Form
Where
             does all
              that
              data
               go?

https://hydro.Rutgers.edu
Filtering for Infiltration
Basins from the entire
basin layer (close up of the
Freehold area)
All Infiltration basins selected that are within 1000 feet of
the Surface Water Quality Standards Stream Network
Zoom to area of interest – basin is an
      infiltration, class IV dam

    Other basins near stream but
    are not infiltration based
Statewide Basin layer
showing basins with
infiltration component

 Possible Analyses:
 -basin type
 -Basin age (surrogate for retrofit)
 -Land use (TMDL)
 -SWQS
 -Flooding potential
 -groundwater impacts
 -H&H research (CN’s, PRF’s Tc)
 -identification of possible dams
 -basin maintenance records
All Basin Data are publicly downloadable in CSV format and includes
                       spatial coordinate data
David Reilly
         District Manager
Cape Atlantic Conservation District
How the District and Municipalities
       Can Work Together
 Cape Atlantic Conservation District
   serves the 39 municipalities throughout
   Atlantic and Cape May Counties
 Permitting process
 Preconstruction meetings
 Report of compliance/certificate of occupancy
  process
 Work cooperatively with construction officials
  and municipal engineers to meet the objectives of
  the Acts
 Communication is important
Web Site Information
Web Site Information
Questions and Inquiries

David Reilly, District Manager        Frank Minch                    John Showler, P.E.
609‐625‐3144, ext. 11                 Executive Secretary, SSCC      State Erosion Control Engineer
davidreilly@capeatlantic.org          NJ Department of Agriculture   NJ Department of Agriculture
                                      PO Box 330                     PO Box 330
Michael Kent, Asst. Manager           Trenton, NJ 08625              Trenton, NJ 08625
609‐625‐3144, ext. 14                 frank.minch@ag.nj.gov          john.showler@ag.nj.gov
michaelkent@capeatlantic.org           609‐292‐5532                  609‐292‐5540
Glenn Ward, Site Inspector III
609‐625‐3144 ext. 13
glennward@capeatlantic.org                 Standards and forms may be downloaded from:
Marie Rogowski ,                                       www.capeatlantic.org
Administrative Assistant II                                     and
609‐625‐3144 ext. 10                   www.nj.gov/agriculture/divisions/anr/nrc/njerosion.html
marierogowski@capeatlantic.org
Celia Rodrigues,
Agriculture Conservation Specialist
856‐285‐7672
You can also read