Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions for Older Adults in Congregate Settings to Reduce the Impact of Confinement Syndrome - FINAL March 25, 2021

Page created by Edna Hughes
 
CONTINUE READING
Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions
          for Older Adults in
  Congregate Settings to Reduce the
  Impact of Confinement Syndrome

                  FINAL

              March 25, 2021
INTRODUCTION
In May 2020, the North Simcoe Muskoka Specialized Geriatric Services (NSM SGS) program
released a paper entitled “The Need for a Multi-Dimensional Strategy to Address the Care of
Older Adults & Their Caregivers in COVID-19”. Within that paper and associated placemat, a
strategy was proposed to better support the breadth of needs of older adults and their
caregivers during COVID-19. Since May, the NSM SGS program has been working to address all
dimensions of the strategy, with specific attention on the impact of COVID-19 restrictions
(Dimension 3), including Confinement Syndrome.

Recognizing the impact of Confinement Syndrome, this discussion paper offers health system
leaders suggestions to consider to begin to safely ease restrictions in congregate settings like
Long-Term Care Homes (LTCH) and Retirement Homes (RH). Through these considerations, the
NSM SGS program hopes to stimulate discussion toward the development of a provincial
strategy to support the re-engagement of older adults and caregivers in congregate settings.

CONTEXT
Confinement Syndrome
Throughout the course of the pandemic, the NSM SGS program has led the charge locally and
provincially to raise awareness of Confinement Syndrome. Confinement Syndrome reflects the
constellation of clinical issues that emerged in older adults and caregivers during the pandemic
that could be directly or indirectly attributed to COVID restrictions. Issues include those affecting:
    • Physical health & well-being (i.e. preventable acute illnesses, dehydration, inadequate
       pain management)
    • Mental health & cognition (i.e. loneliness, anxiety, depression, delirium, responsive
       behaviours)
    • Functional status (i.e. reduced mobility, falls, declining ADL and/or IADL abilities); and,
    • Caregiver health & well-being (i.e. caregiver stress, elder abuse)

Restrictions
Significant restrictions were implemented in hospitals and congregate settings starting in mid-
March to protect vulnerable residents, patients and visitors from COVID-19. Recognizing the
impact of Confinement Syndrome, the NSM SGS program produced a paper in June 2020
advocating for health system leaders to find ways to safely resume visiting in these settings. At
the same time, the government updated Directive #3 and released guidelines to begin re-
opening LTCHs and RHs. Since then, varying levels of restrictions have continued more broadly
in alignment with the provincial COVID response framework and more specifically with
organization-specific policy. Policy interpretation and the state of community transmission has
created further variation between homes.

Since the outset of the pandemic, restrictions have played an important role in reducing spread
among older adults. In January 2021, Canadians over age 60 accounted for approximately 21%
of COVID-19 cases, 71% of COVID-related hospitalizations and over 95% of COVID-related
deaths, with approximately half occurring in LTCHs. While devastating, the number of cases and
deaths would have been worse if facilities had not implemented strict restrictions.

Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions in Congregate Settings                                    1
While restrictions have played an important role over the last year, the loss of usual contact with
loved ones coupled with the loss of usual routine/activities has taken its toll on older adults and
their caregivers. Social engagement and interaction is important to one’s sense of meaning,
worth and belonging. Health care providers have provided exceptional support across homes
through the pandemic; however, that support can never replicate or replace the support of
loved ones. Restrictions have improved over time for essential caregivers but limits still exist on
the type, amount and frequency of contact. Cohorting continues along with limitations on
group activities. Virtual contact has helped support connections between residents and their
loved ones but both will tell you it has not been enough.

Changing Environment with Vaccine Administration
Protecting the health and well-being of older adults and their caregivers during COVID-19 has
been a key priority of the government and health care providers. With a growing number of
residents and staff vaccinated in congregate settings like LTCHs and RHs, an opportunity exists to
begin to ease restrictions to support these micro-communities in a different way than the
general population. While the variants of concern continue to pose a risk i, a recent study has
shown that eight weeks after the start of vaccination, the estimated relative reduction in COVID
incidence was 89% in LTCH residents and 79% in LTCH staff. In that same period, the estimated
relative reduction in COVID mortality in residents was 96% ii. Although it would be ideal to
remove all restrictions, caution is still required. In British Columbia, the Cottonwoods Care Centre
has experienced a COVID outbreak on a short-stay wing for people recovering from surgery. Of
the twenty-three people infected, eight had at least one dose of the vaccine. However, the
outbreak has been less lethal with no deaths or hospitalizations iii. In the United States, the CDC
recently released public health recommendations for fully vaccinated people in healthcare and
non-healthcare setting. These recommendations provide greater permissions in interaction
between fully vaccinated individuals, although the organization has provided fewer permissions
to those in congregate health care settings like LTCHs and RHs iv .

SUGGESTIONS FOR CONSIDERATION
To balance the impact of Confinement Syndrome with the safety of residents, staff and essential
caregivers, health system leaders are encouraged to explore and identify strategies to begin to
ease restrictions (and grant increasing permissions) in micro-communities like LTCHs and RHs
where high rates of vaccination have occurred. The following are offered as suggestions for
consideration in the development of policies and practices as they pertain to older adults, staff
and essential caregivers in these congregate settings.

Provide the Necessary Authority to Monitor Vaccination Rates
Granting permissions require confidence in the accuracy of resident vaccination rates as well as
in the vaccination rates of staff and essential caregivers. Vaccination rates can then be used as
the criteria by which homes are granted increasing permissions. At this time, vaccinations
remain personal health information and there is no authority by home administrators to request,
collect and maintain this information. This consideration does not suggest vaccination should be
mandatory – that is outside the scope of this document. Instead, the focus is on providing
homes the authority to monitor uptake to determine the degree of permissions allowed.

Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions in Congregate Settings                                  2
Additional strategies that could support this may include having COVID vaccine as a mandatory
part of staff vaccination records and, if feasible, creating a secure link for administrators in the
COVAX system to support monitoring.

Support Vaccine Uptake Among Staff
While many staff in homes have been vaccinated, vaccination rates across organizations
continue to vary. Vaccine access and confidence in the vaccine have been key issues
plaguing uptake. With the establishment of clinics across regions, uptake should improve but for
some, transportation and access continue to be challenges. While we would encourage a
supportive approach to promote uptake, levers could be applied, if required. Considerations
could include:
   • Providing additional on-site vaccine clinic hours in homes with lower uptake as part of
        the community-based roll-out plan (i.e. the plan to deliver vaccine in local communities
        to homebound individuals);
   • Ensuring staff have paid leaves during work hours to attend clinics and that they are
       replaced during that period (assumes sufficient staffing to replace);
   • Creating home-based champions to support decision-making among staff and essential
       caregivers;
   • Undertaking a province wide campaign for staff using available communication
       channels, including social media, to promote vaccine uptake. This campaign should
       leverage available resources (i.e. public health resources, presentations like that
       provided by Dr Kevin Young), outline the key criteria for easing restrictions, ensure staff
       are clear on how to access vaccines, address vaccine myths and facts, and be
       available in languages and with input from community leaders to effectively reach the
       diversity of LTC staff;
   • Monitoring the volume and rate of staff vaccination and, if appropriate, providing priority
       ranking to this population ahead of any expansion to Phase 2 priority populations; and,
   • If required, using levers like:
            o Reduced testing frequency for vaccinated staff;
            o Modified PPE requirements for vaccinated staff; and/or,
            o Adjusting current reimbursement practices related to sick time should staff
               experience COVID symptoms or contract COVID, as is done with flu shots in some
               organizations (assuming the staff decision is based on personal choice vs health-
               related criteria). In some places, incentives are being offered to encourage
               uptake (i.e. gift cards). In both of these considerations we must be conscious of
               the impact of such levers (i.e. financial hardship) and the precedent they set.

Support Vaccine Uptake Among Essential Caregivers
As part of Phase 1, essential caregivers were identified as priority populations for vaccine roll-out.
While many were vaccinated, a large number were not. Confidence in the vaccine, vaccine
access and communication between homes and the caregivers contributed to varying degrees
of success. With the expansion of priority populations and a move to an on-line booking process
(previously the homes were coordinating appointments), many essential caregivers are
struggling to navigate and access the system. Granting permissions in congregate settings,
including expanding visiting practices, requires optimal uptake by essential caregivers. The

Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions in Congregate Settings                                    3
following are offered as suggestions to promote uptake, with many similar to those identified
above for staff. Once again, we would encourage a supportive approach but levers could be
applied, if required:
     • Providing additional on-site clinic hours in homes with lower uptake as part of the
        community-based roll-out plan (i.e. the plan to deliver vaccine in local communities to
        homebound individuals);
     • As before, allowing congregate settings the ability to support essential caregivers in
        booking appointments (this would also support monitoring uptake);
     • Creating home-based champions to support decision-making among staff and essential
        caregivers;
     • Undertaking a province wide campaign for essential caregivers using available
        communication channels, including social media, to promote vaccine uptake. This
        campaign should leverage available resources (i.e. public health resources,
        presentations like that provided by Dr Kevin Young), outline the key criteria for easing
        restrictions, ensure essential caregivers are clear on how to access vaccines, and
        address vaccine myths and facts;
     • Monitoring the volume and rate of essential caregiver vaccination and, if appropriate,
        providing priority ranking to this population ahead of any expansion to Phase 2 priority
        populations; and,
     • If required, using levers like:
             o Reduced testing frequency for vaccinated essential caregivers;
             o Modified restrictions around visit types, timing and frequency for vaccinated
                 essential caregivers; and/or,
             o Modified PPE requirements for vaccinated essential caregivers.

Apply a Phased Approach to Easing Restrictions
Recognizing that not all congregate settings like LTCHs and RHs have the same success rate of
vaccination uptake, the safety of residents, staff and essential caregivers must remain the
overriding consideration.
   • For the safety of older adults, the province could require homes to achieve a minimum
        vaccination rate of residents (i.e. 85%) before any permissions are granted. Of note, the
        CDC has defined fully vaccinated people as individuals who are at least 2 weeks out
        from having received their second dose of Pfizer or Moderna v . In Canada, we would
        also consider Astra-Zeneca in this list.
   • Should the provincial minimum vaccination rate of residents be met, then a phased
        approach could be used based on key criteria and considerations to determine the level
        of permissions granted with the home:
            o To ensure a clear understanding of the permissions, a standard provincial matrix
               outlining the (a) criteria and (b) permissions could be helpful tool to navigate and
               communicate the various possible scenarios.
            o (a) The matrix structure could consider several key criteria, with each unlocking
               an associated set of permissions in the home:
                     Resident stability may affect vaccination rates if there is high turnover in
                       the home. More stability could be associated with more permissions.

Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions in Congregate Settings                                 4
     Staff vaccination rate could be associated with increased permissions for
                        residents within the building (i.e. group activities, cohorting, outdoor
                        activities, testing). Rates could determine the degree to which
                        permissions are unlocked (i.e.
permissions to monitor the impact of change. They could be required to
                      spend a defined period in each step before being allowed to move to
                      the next step.
                     Homes should focus initially on easing restrictions within the facility related
                      to resident-resident activity to monitor the impact of change. Initially
                      increased permissions should be allowed within existing cohorts. If
                      successful, cohorts could begin to expand. This could be followed by
                      expanding permissions for essential caregivers.

Protect At-Risk Populations
Several at-risk populations must be considered in planning:
    • Those not able / not choosing / not yet vaccinated – Clear provincial direction and
        organization policy could be defined for residents, staff and essential caregivers who are
        not able / not choosing / not yet vaccinated. The policy could require a higher level of
        safety measures, screening and monitoring for these individuals than that of the general
        population in the home. This policy could supersede the matrix permissions for the home.
    • New admissions – The approach to new admissions could be tied to the individual’s
        vaccination status. If vaccinated, they could be provided a reduced isolation period or
        no isolation period. If they are not vaccinated, they could fall into the above policy. If
        appropriate, consideration could be given to cohorting these individuals for a required
        period to promote safety and support monitoring.

Ensure Clear Provider & Public Communication
It will be important for communication around permissions to be clear so that the homes can
consistently apply them and so that residents, essential caregivers and the public have a clear
understanding of what to expect:
     • Leveraging provincial guidance documents – At present several provincial guidance
          documents exist to support policies, practices and care within the homes.
             o The provincial response framework provides guidance based on the level of risk
                 present in communities. While these mini-communities have a degree of
                 protection that exceeds that currently available in the general community,
                 community spread should remain a consideration as vaccinated individuals may
                 still be able to contract and spread disease. An option could be to define
                 practices within homes outside the construct of this framework until community
                 vaccination rates increase to level comparable to these mini-communities.
             o Key provincial direction documents, including Directive #3 for LTCHs (updated
                 December 7 2020), RH COVID-19 Visiting Policy (released December 9 2020) and
                 COVID-19: Visiting LTCHs Policy (published December 26 2020) should be revised
                 as appropriate to reflect any changes made. If appropriate, the matrix concept
                 could be pulled into these documents.
     • Interpretation and application of provincial direction
             o LTCHs are frequently navigating requests from families where on the surface there
                 appears to be gaps or inconsistencies in guidance documents. When it is not
                 appropriate or overly-prescriptive to provide greater clarity in the guidance
                 documents, a FAQ document could be helpful as a way to track and respond to

Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions in Congregate Settings                                    6
questions that would be applicable across homes. For example, current direction
                 is that two essential caregivers can be designated but that they cannot visit at
                 the same time unless they reside in the same household. If they are both visiting
                 the same resident, is there still rationale for them visiting at different times when a
                 simultaneous visit might significantly enhance the quality of the interaction?
   •    Ease of access to information - At this point, it is unclear where essential caregivers and
        the public can go to source information about current home restrictions. This information
        is not included in the provincial response framework and the directives and visiting policy
        guidance documents are not easily found on central websites like https://covid-
        19.ontario.ca/ As such, one consideration may be to make information more visible and
        accessible to essential caregivers and the public.
   •    Ministry and public reporting – The status of all homes could be reported regionally to
        Ontario Health and rolled-up to support provincial monitoring. Ideally:
            o The reporting should not create undue burden on homes and should be aligned
                 with the provincial matrix structure.
            o A status report of all homes should be made public in a timely fashion so essential
                 caregivers, health care partners, communities and the public are aware of each
                 home’s associated permissions.
            o The status of permissions of each home should be well communicated. It could
                 be posted on the entrance of the homes and all changes should be clearly
                 communicated in a timely fashion to residents, staff and essential caregivers.

CONCLUSION
The purpose of this discussion paper is to support health system leaders to begin to consider
options to safely ease restrictions in congregate settings like LTCHs and RHs. The list of
suggestions was informed by some key conversations but it is far from comprehensive or perfect!
The suggestions (right or wrong) are merely offered to stimulate discussion and identify
opportunities for action. We hope it will:

    •   Demonstrate the link between current restrictions and Confinement Syndrome among
        older adults and their caregivers.
    •   Highlight key considerations for health system leaders to begin to safely ease restrictions
        within congregate settings like LTCHs and RHs.
    •   Emphasize the important role the Ministry and Public Health Ontario will play in providing
        direction, including the development of a provincial strategy to support the re-
        engagement of older adults and caregivers in congregate settings.

Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions in Congregate Settings                                      7
References & Notes
i COVID-19 Pandemic – RAEB’S Evidence Update: March 22, 2021. From: Davies, Jarvis,
Edmunds, Jewell, Diaz-Ordaz & Keogh (March 15 2021). Increased mortality in community-
tested cases of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7. Nature (2021).
Sourced March 24, 2021: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03426-1

 “To identify whether the SARS-CoV-2 variant, B.1.1.7 (i.e., the variant first identified in the UK)
leads to any change in disease severity, this study analyzed a dataset linking positive SARS-CoV-
2 community tests (n=2,245,263) and COVID-19 deaths (n=17,452) in England from September 1,
2020 to February 14, 2021. A total of 4,945 deaths were identified, indicating a hazard of death
that was 55% higher after adjustment for demographic factors. Overall, the study estimated a
61% (42-82%) higher hazard of death associated with B.1.1.7. These findings suggest that B.1.1.7 is
not only more transmissible than pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 variants but may also cause more
severe illness.”

ii Brown, Stall, Vanniyasingam, Buchan, Daneman, Hillmer, Hopkins, Johnstone, Maltsev,
McGeer, Sander, Savage, Watts, Jüni, Rochon on behalf of the Congregate Care Setting
Working Group and the Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table. (March 8 2021). Early Impact
of Ontario’s COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout on Long-Term Care Home Residents and Health Care
Workers. Version 1.1.
Sourced March 21 2021: https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/sciencebrief/early-impact-of-ontarios-
covid-19-vaccine-rollout-on-long-term-care-home-residents-and-health-care-workers/

iii Hager. (March 18 2021). COVID-19 outbreak at British Columbia long-term care home
includes vaccinated residents. Globe & Mail.
Sourced March 21 2021: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/british-columbia/article-
outbreak-at-british-columbia-long-term-care-home-includes-vaccinated/

iv Christie, Mbaeyi, Walensky. (March 10 2021). CDC Interim Recommendations for Fully
Vaccinated People: An Important First Step. JAMA. Published online March 10, 2021.
Sourced on March 24 2021: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777536

   •   “Preliminary evidence suggests that the currently authorized COVID-19 vaccines may
       provide some protection against a variety of strains, including B.1.1.7 (originally identified
       in the UK). However, reduced antibody neutralization and efficacy have been observed
       for the B.1.351 strain (originally identified in South Africa).
   •   A growing body of evidence suggests that fully vaccinated people are less likely to have
       asymptomatic infection and potentially less likely to transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others.
       However, further investigation is ongoing.
   •   Modeling studies suggest that preventive measures such as mask use and social
       distancing will continue to be important during vaccine implementation. However, there

Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions in Congregate Settings                                   8
are ways to take a balanced approached by allowing vaccinated people to resume
       some lower-risk activities.
   •   Taking steps toward relaxing certain measures for vaccinated persons may help improve
       COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake.
   •   The risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely
       eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus. Vaccinated
       people could potentially still get COVID-19 and spread it to others. However, the benefits
       of relaxing some measures, such as quarantine requirements, and reducing social
       isolation may outweigh the residual risk of fully vaccinated people becoming ill with
       COVID-19 or transmitting the virus to others.”

CDC (March 8 2021). Interim Public Health Recommendations for Fully Vaccinated People.
Sourced March 24 2021: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-
vaccinated-guidance.html#anchor_1615143434429
   “The following recommendations apply to non-healthcare settings. … Fully vaccinated
   people can:
           • Visit with other fully vaccinated people indoors without wearing masks or physical
              distancing
           • Visit with unvaccinated people from a single household who are at low risk for
              severe COVID-19 disease indoors without wearing masks or physical distancing
           • Refrain from quarantine and testing following a known exposure if asymptomatic

   For now, fully vaccinated people should continue to:
          • Take precautions in public like wearing a well-fitted mask and physical distancing
          • Wear masks, practice physical distancing, and adhere to other prevention
              measures when visiting with unvaccinated people who are at increased risk for
              severe COVID-19 disease or who have an unvaccinated household member who
              is at increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease
          • Wear masks, maintain physical distance, and practice other prevention measures
              when visiting with unvaccinated people from multiple households
          • Avoid medium- and large-sized in-person gatherings
          • Get tested if experiencing COVID-19 symptoms
          • Follow guidance issued by individual employers
          • Follow CDC and health department travel requirements and recommendation”

CDC. (March 10 2021). Updated Healthcare Infection Prevention and Control
Recommendations in Response to COVID-19 Vaccination.
Sourced March 24 2021: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-
after-vaccination.html

“This guidance applies to all healthcare personnel (HCP) while at work and all patients and
residents while they are being cared for in a healthcare setting.

Taking Steps to Safely Ease Restrictions in Congregate Settings                               9
Visitation in Post-Acute Care Facilities, including Nursing Homes
During the pandemic, guidance from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
has limited (except for compassionate care situations) indoor visitation for residents in post-acute
care facilities when the COVID-19 county positivity rate is >10% or when there is an outbreak
occurring in the facility. Relaxing current restrictions on indoor visitation might increase the risk for
transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in post-acute care facilities. However, vaccination of residents and
HCP can mitigate some of these risks, and expanding visitation has substantial benefits to
residents.

Indoor visitation could be permitted for all residents except as noted below:
   • Indoor visitation for unvaccinated residents should be limited solely to compassionate
       care situations if the COVID-19 county positivity rate is >10% and
•   Facilities should have a plan to manage visitation and visitor flow. Visitors should
       physically distance from other residents and HCP in the facility. Facilities may need to
       limit the number of visitors per resident at one time as well as the total number of visitors in
       the facility at one time in order to maintain infection control precautions.
   •   Visits for residents who share a room should ideally not be conducted in the resident’s
       room. If in-room visitation must occur (e.g., resident is unable to leave the room), an
       unvaccinated roommate should not be present during the visit. If neither resident is able
       to leave the room, facilities should attempt to enable in-room visitation while maintaining
       recommended infection prevention and control practices, including physical distancing
       and source control.”

v Christie, Mbaeyi, Walensky. (March 10, 2021). CDC Interim Recommendations for Fully
Vaccinated People: An Important First Step. JAMA. Published online March 10, 2021.
Sourced on March 24 2021: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777536

vi Kain, Stall, Allen, et al. Routine asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 screen testing of Ontario long-term
care staff after COVID-19 vaccination. Science Briefs of the Ontario COVID -19 Science Advisory
Table. 2021;2(15). https://doi.org/10.47326/ocsat.2021.02.15.1.0

“There is no available real-world evidence to either support or refute the benefit of routine
asymptomatic screen testing in preventing COVID-19 outbreaks. Screen testing among Ontario
LTC staff between June 28, 2020 and March 13, 2021 yielded an overall test positivity of 0.16%,
which decreased to
You can also read