Welcome, science globalisers! - Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships April 22, 2021 - ERA-LEARN
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Welcome, science globalisers!
Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships
April 22, 2021
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation
Adjusting GoToMeeting
Page 2
Rules for the Workshop
1 Modify your appearance for others:
Click on the symbols to determine your appearance (audio, camera).
They are usually located in the center of the lower end of the
GoToMeeting window.
Another option is to click on the „ …“ icon in the participant-window showing yourself and/or your name. There, you
may also change your name visible to others.
Audio and video settings can be modified in the settings menu (top right)
2 We kindly ask you to stay muted in audio and video during the workshop (except when asked by the moderator)
3 Questions may be raised through the chat section
Click the chat icon (top right)
Type your comment/question in the text space (lower side in chat window), „send to all“
4 No video or audio recordings! – however, chat is saved
Thank you!
Introduction to ERA-LEARN
Who we are and what we do
Roland Brandenburg, FFG
ERA-LEARN: main goals 2018-2022
➢ support the transition of Partnerships from Horizon 2020 to Horizon Europe:
▪ interact closely with the Partnerships community and facilitate a dialogue
among stakeholders
▪ provide the Partnerships community with evidence and guidance
4
ERA-LEARN: service provider
▪ central information hub: the ERA-LEARN portal www.era-learn.eu
▪ databases:
➢ networks, countries, organisations
➢ joint calls, funded projects
➢ thematic information
▪ material, guidance & toolkits
➢ joint calls & other joint activities
➢ support impact assessments
➢ good practise for specific common challenges
➢ reports
▪ interaction with community
➢ events
5
Some figures from the database
Disclaimer
please consider:
➢ the ERA-LEARN database of calls and projects relies on data supplied by
networks! we try to collect everything but there could be gaps
➢ graphs show preliminary data –some H2020 networks are still ongoing
➢ currently (April 2021) 5800 funded projects with 31800 research group
participations
➢ some networks could/should be seen as one –e.g. some JPIs have
launched several ERA-NET Cofund networks which have separate database
entries
➢ nevertheless, trends with respect to countries and framework programmes
are obvious
7
Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
140 137
120
100
80
80
60
40
18
20
6
0
FP6 FP7 Horizon 2020 JPI
Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships under FP6
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
FP6 partnerships
4
3
2
1
0
Canada Russia
Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships under FP7
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
20
18
FP7 partnerships
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships under H2020
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
30
H2020 partnerships
25
20
15
10
5
0Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
45
40
35
30
FP6+FP7+H2020+JPI partnerships
25
20
15
10
5
0Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
16
14
12
10
H2020 partnerships + JPI
8
6
4
2
0Participations of non-European funding organisations in joint calls
participations of non-European funding organisations in joint calls
400 395
350
300
250
200 184
150
100
50 41
8
0
FP6 FP7 Horizon 2020 JPIParticipations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
1600
1483
1400
1200
1000
800
600
408
400 373
200
29
0
FP6 FP7 Horizon2020 JPI100
200
300
500
600
0
400
EDCTP2
JPI AMR
PRIMA
ERANet-LAC
Eurostars 2
FACCE JPI
EMPIR
ERANETMED
JPco-fuND
BiodivScen
EN-SUGI
M-ERA.NET 2
ARIMNet
BiodivERsA3
NEURON Cofund
EMRP
JPI Urban Europe
ERA PerMed
E-Rare-3
JPI Climate
T2S
WaterWorks2017
ERA-NET NEURON II
EuroNanoMed III
M-ERA.NET
EN SGplusRegSys
ERA-GAS
ERA-MIN 2
Eurostars
JPCOFUND2
ERACAPS
JPI MYBL
WaterWorks2015
ACT
BiodivERsA2
ERA-CVD
ERA-MIN
ERA-ARD II
BONUS+
EJP RD
ERA-ARD
NEURON
CIRCLE
ERA CoBioTech
ERA-HDHL
JPND
WoodWisdom-Net 2
BONUS
GENDER NET Plus
GeoERA
AAL 2
FP6+FP7+H2020+JPI
EMEurope
SusCrop
ERA-IB-2
MANUNET III
SusAn
TRANSCAN-2
ERA-PG
ETB-PRO
HDHL-INTIMIC
MarTERA
ERASysBio+
FACCE Era Net Plus
FLAG-ERA
ForestValue
HERA JRP UP
QuantERA
WaterWorks2014
WOODWISDOM-NET
WoodWisdom-Net+
ANIHWA
EMIDA
ENSUF
ERASysBio
FACCE SURPLUS
FLAG-ERA II
HERITAGE PLUS
participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
ICRAD
JPI Cultural Heritage
SUSFOOD
Participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls100
150
200
250
300
0
50
Canada
USA
South Africa
Tunisia
Korea, Republic of
Brazil
Uganda
Morocco
China
Tanzania
Algeria
Argentina
Egypt
Kenya
India
Taiwan
Australia
Russia
Ethiopia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chile
Senegal
Burkina Faso
Japan
Ghana
Lebanon
Nigeria
Mozambique
New Zealand
Peru
Zambia
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Gabon
Jordan
Cameroon
Zimbabwe
Madagascar
Malawi
Colombia
Mali
Mexico
Côte d' Ivoire
Dominican Republic
Uruguay
Guinea
Sudan
Liberia
Belarus
Rwanda
Guatemala
Panama
Sierra Leone
Thailand
Vietnam
Ecuador
FP6+FP7+H2020+JPI
Swaziland
Botswana
Costa Rica
Indonesia
Namibia
Pakistan
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Angola
Benin
Bolivia
Gambia
Liechtenstein
Togo
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Cuba
Hong Kong
Lao Peoples Democratic Republic
Malaysia
origin of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
Niger
Singapore
Bangladesh
Belize
Cambodia
Equatorial Guinea
Hong Kong
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Mauritius
Nepal
Nicaragua
Participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
OmanInternational participation in RTD projects: H2020 vs. joint calls by H2020 partnerships
participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects
2.000
9%
1.800
H2020 projects
1.600
1.400 projects funded by H2020 partnerships + JPI
1.200
1.000
800
10%
600
41%
10%
400 19%
34% 10% 7%
200
42% 26% 25% 20%
0
Korea Canada South Africa Taiwan Kenya New Brazil Australia Japan China United Russian
(Republic of) Zealand (People's States Federation
Republic of)Conclusions
➢ very strong general trend FP6 → FP7 → H2020
➢ increased participation of funding organisations in network consortia
➢ increased participation of funding organisations in joint calls
➢ increased participation of research groups in funded RTD projects
➢ 2293 non-European research group participations in 5800 funded projects (vs 31800
total research group participations) = approx. 7.5%
➢ H2020 networks: 1482 of 17469 research groups in funded RTD projects = 8.5%
➢ some countries are particularly strong in applying to joint calls (compared to H2020)
19Visit the ERA-LEARN Portal
https://www.era-learn.eu/network-information/countries
20Thank you.
Globalisation of European Partnership Initiatives-
Findings from interviews with experts from practitioners
Peter Hahn and Jadranka Dokic, VDI/VDE IT
Ralf König, FFG
Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships,
online, April 22, 2021Background Page 23
Globalisation is a task of most Partnerships ➔ reflected in ERA-LEARN Work plan tasks (like monitoring,
evaluation, widening etc. )
Mission of task
• Support Transition H2020 → Horizon Europe
• Results should be useful for acting/interested persons on the level of networks/partnerships
• Search for specifics rather than statistics
Approach
• Database analysis
• Interviews
• Ratings regarding single selected questions
Output Outcome Impact
• Brief policy brief EC, MS
• Dissemination: Website
• Good/failed practice hints (for practitioners): Reflection during Workshop(s)
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsDisclaimer Page 24
This was not science!
• The choice of interview partners was made in an evolving cooperative process, not following clear criteria
• People were interviewed as experts – we were not collecting official statements or compiling supporting facts for
opinions
• There is not „a“ Partnership – no clear limitations or borders, cross-xyz everywhere, joint actions, multiple projects
under shared roofs….
• The subject „European Partnership“ is wide and comprises different types of initiatives acting on different levels
(policy, agency) and in different global areas based on different motivations to do so
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsPage 25
15
5
4
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsFindings – European Partnerships
Importance of motivation for globalisation Page 26
Research Excellence -
Connecting to the leading
global research
8,1
9,0
8,0
8,1
7,0
Coordination of R&I
Access to global markets 6,0
5,0 roadmaps
7,4
6,5 4,0
3,0
2,0
1,0
0,0
Distribution/dissemination Avoid duplication and
of knowledge (global 6,4 increase research
common good orientation) 7,2 efficiency
Joint tackling of global Science diplomacy, NCP, 1 = not important
challenges Accession FP etc. 5 = average
8,9 10 = very important
6,1
n = 14
average
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsInternational participations (funding orgs.) in P2P under FP7
20
18
FP7
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0International participations (funding orgs.) in P2P under H2020
30
25
H2020
20
15
10
5
0Findings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships
Identification and admission of global partners, sustained integration Page 29
Different (elements of) practices exist:
• Identification of research areas with similar challenges ➔ active search for suitable global partners
• (depending on Mission/Self-perception) rather cooperation with global partners than their network integration
• (open) expression of interest in global networks
• Definition of minimum requirements, formal admission rules, credibility checks, trial periods
• Recommendation of global partners in the existing Consortium of European Partnerships
Session a) will reference a good practice example for membership retention
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsFindings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships
Page 30
Clear objectives
Thesis/Recommendation:
• Global cooperation should always follow well defined goals
• Each Partnerships may determine and clearly communicate it´s driving motivation for globalisation
• This may include differentiated approaches for different goals or activities
Such expectation management may
➔ Help to find and attract the right global partners and
➔ Prevent from being used for objectives and activities “out of scope”
➔ Align network activities
Session c) will address this issue
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsFindings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships
Page 31
Define, realise and fund functional paths for global partner integration
Preparatory measures are undertaken prior to roadmapping/call participation
• identifying suitable matching research teams/infrastructures
• research areas of mutual collaboration interest
• detection of and dealing with administrative barriers
• Promotion on policy level where necessary
• Time!
• …
➔ Appropriate measures should be foreseen, and equipped with sufficient resources in work plans
(funds/effort, time, preparatory meetings)
…also in the scope of session c)
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsFindings / Thesis / Recommendation – Global Partners, global cooperation Projects
Customise identification and integration of global partners? Page 32
Perception of European Partnerships among targeted global partners
• The concept of “European Partnership” is not very well understood around the globe
• Global partners will have difficulties to identify you as a potential partner
➔ Search, assess and address partners yourself (as a partnership)?
➔ Be pragmatic, specific, and customize?
(cooperation subject, research topics, type of activity, reciprocal administrative needs)
➔ Align/coordinate “icebreaker” (like former INCO projects, EURAXESS, BILATS etc.) with thematic
networks?
➔ Make use of existing global networks on policy, agency and researcher level…competence centers,
research communities?
…let us know if you would like to exchange on this issue
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsFindings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships & Foreign relations
Coordination of globalisation target countries and activities with stakeholders Page 33
Coordination in between policy level, diplomatic community and level of funding agency is difficult and not
always fully functional
• European Partnerships have developed to be important and functional platforms for global cooperation
• Partnerships operate on the base of mutually beneficial cooperation – and they should promote themselves as
instrument for sustainable implementation of diplomatic objectives in foreign relations
➔ European/national diplomatic services, Commission and MS administrations at the interface of foreign
relations and science cooperation and European Partnerships should improve communication and
coordination (standard procedures/tasks, contact persons, exchange platform ERA-LEARN…?)
…session b) will detail a good practice…
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsFindings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships
Page 34
Ethics in global cooperation
A lack of dedicated ethical standards is causing “mixed feelings” “under the surface” …
• Ethical and political standards vary more in global cooperation than in EU MS cooperation settings
• Areas include e.g. scientific credibility/standards, human rights, freedom of science and speech, non-
discriminatory behaviour, digital sovereignty, limited use of personal data, respect of IPR (or granting of open
access respectively), exclusively civilian use etc.
➔ Measures of dealing with these subjects need to be applied, distinct or implicitly, for partner search,
admission, call and project cooperation
Session d) will address selected aspects of this issue
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsFindings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships
Evaluation of globalisation? Page 35
Evaluated outputs/outcomes/impacts seem to get high attention in the Commission
➔ Expressly evaluate globalisation in Partnership evaluation!?
…let us know if you would like to exchange on this issue…
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsPage 36
Thank you!
peter.hahn@vdivde-it.de
Ralf.koenig@ffg.at
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsERA-LEARN WORKSHOP
Attracting & Deepening
Global Partnerships
April 22, 2021
Klaus Niederländer
Ambient Assisted Living AssociationAdapting to Demographic Change
The AAL story of accompanying system change
Linking Co-Creating
Changing Ageing
Technology (virtual) social
Narrative
with Ageing infrastructure
❖ From Assisted Living to The New Old ❖ Virtual Communities &
Active & Healthy Ageing Platforms
❖ Values- and Systems-based:
❖ Intervention domains in
Inclusive, Open, Fair
health & care, mobility &
❖ Legal Compliance & Ethical
transport, home,
Excellence
community & workplace
❖ Software: Apps ❖ Big data, AI, Robotics
❖ Hardware: smart…The Active & Assisted Living Programme 2014-2020
23 Funding
265 projects funded
Members
Euro 1.4m average average AAL
member/EC project investment
Over 200 1400
End–User Project
org, Participants
Joint EU and AAL member
AAL investments of over Euro 300m
1 in 8 projects reaches the market
650 SMEs &
Over 200
100
R&D org.
Industry
18 Member countries with 2 non-
European members (CA, TW)Governance of Global Partnerships
Integrating international AAL members into Partnership structure
General Assembly – ‘Policy Level’
Canada & Taiwan full members of AAL Association
Executive Board - ’Strategy Level’
1 of 5 Boards seats for International Relations
Management Unit & Work Groups - ‘Operational Level’
National Contact Points as members of Management Unit with regular meetings &
active participation in workgroups/Steering CommitteeStrategy Development & Global Partnerships
Networking & Knowledge
Participation International
in future
Meeting within
partnership
annual AAL
strategy
Forum
AAL FORUM
Regular Prospecting
Knowledge of interested
sharing new
eco-systems, international
care innovations partnersOperations & Global Partnerships
Participation in Calls & Support Actions
Beneficiaries of Support
Actions:
AAL2B Project Support,
Canadian & Taiwanese Ethical Guidelines
funded organisations as
part of AAL project
consortia
Member of Call Text
Development WorkgroupERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships, 22nd April 2021
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships
How to coordinate Partnership globalisation with
policy level foreign relations in science and
diplomatic services in MS and COM?
“The Example of Senior Official Meetings as a functional node for
multilateral coordination of policy and agency level”
Marianne Vaske, DLR Project Management Agency
European and international Cooperation
North, Central and South America
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 44 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und InnovationShort EU-LAC policy background
Madrid Action Plan 2010-2012 – “Towards a new stage in the bi-regional partnership: Innovation and technology for
sustainable development and social inclusion adopted by the European Union–Latin America and Caribbean Summit“ in
Madrid in 2010.
The Joint Initiative for Research and Innovation (JIRI) was established in 2010 with the aim of enhancing EU-CELAC
cooperation on science and research.
Senior Officials Meetings (SOMs) are convened regularly to discuss the cooperation in the JIRI, alternating between
Europe and the CELAC region.
The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) is a regional group of Latin American and Caribbean
states created in 2011 to deepen Latin American integration (32 member countries in the Americas). CELAC as a group is
counter part of EC in the political dialogue.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | | 45 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und InnovationOperational level: ALCUE NET and ERANet-LAC ALCUE NET (2012-2017) was the Latin America, Caribbean and European Union Network on research and innovation to establish an EU-LAC platform bringing together actors involved in orientation, funding and implementation, as well as other relevant stakeholders from the public and private sector and civil society. ERANet-LAC (2013-2017) helped foster bi-regional cooperation in research and innovation through concrete joint activities and creating a sustainable framework for future bi-regional joint activities with both European and Latin- American Caribbean research and innovation funding agencies and programme owners. 5 Thematic Working groups on bio-economy including food security, renewable energies, biodiversity and climate change, ICT and health discuss and make suggestions for joint actions, e.g. Joint Calls for ERANet-LAC. Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 46 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation
Operational level: General figures Horizon 2020 / Horizon Europe are both accessible to research institutions and individual researchers and scientists from Latin America and the Caribbean: In the last decade, EU framework programmes on research and innovation have mobilised around EUR 190 million for cooperation with LAC through roughly 1,500 participations in European projects. Erasmus+ funds more than 1,400 individual mobilities between the EU and LAC countries. The role of the NCP Network in LAC: Extremely strong and well developed NCP Network coordinated by AUCI Uruguay: • Provides general information on funding opportunities, raises awareness of the programme, guides potential applicants, advises on administrative procedures and contractual issues etc. Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 47 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation
The Common Research Area (CRA) EU-CELAC Summit in 2015 called for moving towards a Common Research Area (CRA). The 5th JIRI Senior Officials Meeting held in March 2016 launched the Common Research Area, building on three key pillars which are: • Increased mobility of researchers • Access to research infrastructures • Jointly addressing common challenges, such as climate change, sustainable urbanisation, health and multilateral initiatives. • In the 8th JIRI SOM (October 2020), Innovation has been confirmed as 4th pillar of the CRA Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 48 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation
The Common Research Area (CRA) 6th JIRI SOM in March 2017: agreed on concrete policy mechanisms to implement the priorities discussed under the CRA: • EU-CELAC Research Infrastructures (RI) working group to support policy coordination and exchange of information on RI; • CELAC Mobility portal, providing information on national jobs and funding opportunities for researchers. The portal is based on the EURAXESS experience; • Targeted cooperation with CELAC countries under Horizon 2020 in the fields of Health (chronic diseases), Climate change and sustainable urbanisation. These issues were reinforced in the 7th JIRI SOM in October 2017: • Reinforcement of the above priorities. • Need to strengthen the innovation dimension of the EU-CELAC cooperation. • Acknowledgement of International Cooperation Services Facility’s support to the JIRI Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | | 49 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation
The Common Research Area (CRA)
3 years no physical SOM
3 preparatory meetings to ensure a successful 8th SOM in October 2020.
Note: In January 2020, Brazil left the CELAC. Consequently, the 8th SOM took place without Brazil.
Results:
Innovation has been confirmed as 4. pillar of the Common Research Area.
A prior developed draft EU-LAC Roadmap was acknowledged – the formal procedure to adopting the
Roadmap is going on.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 50 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und InnovationThe EU-LAC Interest Group – Platform for funders 2017 – ERANet-LAC and ALCUE Net ended and with them the operational support. A parallel structure was constituted: EU-LAC Interest Group 29 funding agencies from Latin America, the Caribbean countries and the EU Member States and Associated Countries. Outcomes to date: 3 joint calls with a total of 55 funded projects and 26,7 million € public funding Topics: Biodiversity, Bioeconomy, Energy, Health, ICT https://www.eucelac-platform.eu/ Aims to support the implementation of the Common EU-LAC Research Area. EC is not participating directly but has a specific view in terms of maintaining the overall coherence with the Governance of the EU-LAC relations. Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 51 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation
The role of the International Service Facility
The Service Facility in support of International Cooperation in Research and Innovation
assists the European Commission (EC) in reinforcing international policy dialogues world-
wide and identifying opportunities for increased cooperation, including the support of
National Contact Points in European Union Partner Countries.
Objective of the SF in the EU-CELAC context:
Support the operation of the EU-CELAC JIRI and the implementation of the CRA:
The structural support to the JIRI ensures:
• Coordination of activities at biregional level, the streamlining of communication,
instruments and activities under Common Research Area pillars;
• Preparation of Senior Officials Meetings;
• Organisation of regional thematic workshops to implement the CRA priorities.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 52 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und InnovationEU-CELAC Senior Official Meetings as a functional node for multilateral coordination of policy
and agency level
Senior Officials Meetings
• are convened regularly (1/year) to discuss the cooperation in the JIRI and foster the bi-regional
dialogue on issues of global significance, like health, green transition, digital transformation or innovation
are the main body for biregional strategic coordination of the STI policies;
• discuss and initiate new thematic areas, priority topics, objectives;
• ideally allow active preparation, participation and topic setting of all countries from both regions.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 53 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und InnovationTowards a successful SOM and a sustainable political dialogue
• SOM lays the ground for concrete joint activities and thus creates a framework for successful bi-regional joint
activities. But: It does realize the operational steps and activities.
• Both regions must act on equal terms, e.g.
- alternating between Europe and the CELAC region;
- all countries in the region must have the opportunity to actively participate in the political process.
• Ensure regular meetings / reliable time-schedule to keep the momentum.
• Regularly organized SOMs should define incremental steps.
• Set clear goals and measure how effectively they have been achieved (SOM Concept Note presents status quo).
• Challenge: Heterogeneity of CELAC countries (size, resources, political and social environment etc).
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 54 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und InnovationThank you for your attention!
For further information please contact:
Marianne Vaske
DLR Project Management Agency
European and international Cooperation
North, Central and South America
Telephone +49 228 3821-1439
marianne.vaske@dlr.de
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 55 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und InnovationFACCE-JPI: open
to the world
Always the right instrument for mutually beneficial
cooperation? Scientific and diplomatic objectives,
Partnership cooperation instruments and their
varying appropriateness for global cooperation
“Clear subjects and scope for global cooperation and a
pragmatic view on global operation modi – lessons from
FACCE JPI (
Heather McKhann
Joint Programming
Coordinator Executive Secretariat,
Initiative on
Agriculture, Food Security FACCE-JPI
and Climate 22 April 2021
Change ERA-LEARN workshopFACCE-JPI Joint Actions
ALIGNMENT
Knowledge Hubs: MACSUR 1 + 2, Sci-Pol Hub, Food and Nutrition Knowledge Hub
Knowledge Network on Sustainable Intensification
Thematic Annual Programming Network on Soil
50% of joint actions have been
CALLS
developed in cooperation with other
Multi-partner call (with GRA countries)
Call with Belmont Forum
international/EU initiatives
Call with BiodivERsA
138 past and current projects
Call with Water JPI (WaterWorks 2015)
5 FACCE ERA-NETs 250M€ mobilised
FACCE ERA-NET Plus – 1 call https://project-wheel.faccejpi.net/
FACCE SURPLUS – 3 calls
FACCE ERA-GAS – 1 « own » call, 1 joint call and 1 joint call upcoming
SusCrop– 2 calls, 1 upcoming
FOSC – 1 call, 1 upcoming
OTHER EJP Soil
ALL-Ready – CSA to prepare Agroecology partnership
Exploratory and mapping workshops –ca. 25
J o i n t P r o g r a m m i n g I n i t i a t i v e o n A g r i c u l t u r e , F o o d S e c u r i t y a n d C l i m a t e C h a n g e - w w w. f a c c e j p i . c o m 57FACCE-JPI European and International
Cooperation Strategy Objectives (2016)
Promote collaboration, complementarity and structuring of
1 research to tackle global challenges more effectively
Improve the visibility and impact of FACCE-JPI’s work on
2 policymaking and innovation in Europe and beyond
Facilitate the exchange of information, mutual learning and
3 capacity building with similar initiatives in other regions
→ Since November 2020, Vice Chair for international relations
Jean-François Soussana
J o i n t P r o g r a m m i n g I n i t i a t i v e o n A g r i c u l t u r e , F o o d S e c u r i t y a n d C l i m a t e C h a n g e - w w w. f a c c e j p i . c o m 58Why ?
• Strengthen FACCE-JPI’s role as the strategic hub for
coordinating and aligning research in its thematic remit
• Work with other European initiatives to foster science-policy
and science-innovation links, in view of increasing impact
• Foster international collaboration, first with developed
countries (NZ, USA, Canada), to build critical mass and expand
the array of scientific evidence
• Leverage international research alliances, to strengthen
collaboration and synergies with other countries
J o i n t P r o g r a m m i n g I n i t i a t i v e o n A g r i c u l t u r e , F o o d S e c u r i t y a n d C l i m a t e C h a n g e - w w w. f a c c e j p i . c o m 59Target groups and partners
(at programmatic and strategic /institutional levels)
European initiatives International initiatives Non-EU and non-
Associated countries
JPI Water, JPI Healthy Diets Belmont Forum, GRA, New Zealand, USA,
for a Healthy Life, JPI GACSA, 4 per 1000 Canada, Japan
Climate, JPI Oceans, initiative, AgMIP, TempAg,
ERA-NETs (e.g. PRIMA, International Bio- China, Brazil, India, South
BioDivERsA), COST, EIP Economy Forum Africa
Agri, Climate KIC*, JRC*
Structuring of R&I at EU Increased synergies in Increased synergies,
level and strengthening R&I, visibility and “science diplomacy”
of the European impact at the global and mutual learning
Research Area level
J o i n t P r o g r a m m i n g I n i t i a t i v e o n A g r i c u l t u r e , F o o d S e c u r i t y a n d C l i m a t e C h a n g e - w w w. f a c c e j p i . c o m 60Main modalities of engagement
Information • Exchange information on existing research projects, results and
exchange methods (e.g., with other JPIs)
• Coordination and complementarity of research work (e.g., with
Coordination
4/1000 International Research Initiative)
• Development of joint calls for new research proposals (e.g., with the
Belmont Forum, USA, Canada) and ERA-NETs (e.g., with Water JPI)
• Development of joint Knowledge Hubs (e.g. with JPI HDHL)
Collaboration
• Exchange, coordination, harmonisation of data (e.g., with JRC)
• Participation in FACCE-led ERA-NETs (e.g., New Zealand, Canada)
• Participation in partner-led activities (e.g., JPI Climate)
• Membership in the Governing Board (e.g., New Zealand, SCAR)
Institutional or
strategic • Membership in the Scientific or Stakeholder Board (e.g., Climate KIC)
partnership • Strategic partnership (e.g., with GRA, BioDiversa ERA-NET)
J o i n t P r o g r a m m i n g I n i t i a t i v e o n A g r i c u l t u r e , F o o d S e c u r i t y a n d C l i m a t e C h a n g e - w w w. f a c c e j p i . c o m 61Criteria for selecting and prioritising partners
✓ Thematic overlap with the FACCE-JPI Strategic Research Agenda and
current work programme (« Implementation Plan »)
✓ « Key player » in the thematic remit of FACCE-JPI (e.g., in terms of
public R&D investments, scientific publications, visibility)
✓ Availability of funding and compatibility with the research funding
procedures of FACCE-JPI
✓ Mutual interest in and internal capacities for collaboration
J o i n t P r o g r a m m i n g I n i t i a t i v e o n A g r i c u l t u r e , F o o d S e c u r i t y a n d C l i m a t e C h a n g e - w w w. f a c c e j p i . c o m 62Lessons learnt:
Key success factors and challenges
❖ Collaboration needs to add value (e.g., ❖ Complexity of the European R&I
focus on an cross-disciplinary topic; landscape and funding modalities
generate additional data; facilitate data ❖ Agreement on a common topic and
standardisation) modality for collaboration can take time
❖ The joint action is co-constructed from ❖ Difference of timing in research
the start (no « add-on ») programming/programme development
❖ Genuine commitment at policy, funding ❖ Need of interoperable funding and
and research performing levels reporting procedures
❖ Trust-building ❖ Legal hurdles
❖ Stakeholder mapping (within partner ❖ Lack of clarity regarding future funding
organisations) priorities
J o i n t P r o g r a m m i n g I n i t i a t i v e o n A g r i c u l t u r e , F o o d S e c u r i t y a n d C l i m a t e C h a n g e - w w w. f a c c e j p i . c o m 63Thank you for
your attention!
Joint Programming
Initiative on Heather.mckhann@inrae.fr
Agriculture, Food Security
and Climate www.faccejpi.net
Change @faccejpiEthical standards for cooperation with global
partners – Who do “we” collaborate with
and how?
“(Some) ethical issues of global Partnership
cooperation – and ways to tackle them”
Laura Marin
JPIAMR Head of Secretariat
The Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial
Resistance
April 2021
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMRNo Antibiotics: top global political agenda
“Antimicrobial Resistance
(AMR) is one of the ten
major challenges to global
health for the decade”
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMRUniting 28 countries to address AMR
JPIAMR: A global organisation for Working Antibiotics for Everyone
International collaborative platform
Coordinates AMR research and
funding on a global scale
Facilitates interface of
prioritised research with policy
impact
Supports and funds AMR
One Health research
The European Commission
(DG Research) is a full non-
voting member
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMRGlobal worldwide distribution of over the 1.300 researchers supported in JPIAMR projects www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMR
Who do “we” collaborate with and “how”?
International Partnerships -
Membership criteria, influence trough international bodies
and development agencies
• MEMBERSHIP – formal process and criteria
• Formal application letter signed by a governmental representative with motivation rationale including
country´s interest and commitments in the AMR field, listing AMR policies and research programs
• OTHER WAYS OF COLLABORATION
• Engagement with Developing Aid Agencies to fund scientific activities and researchers in LMICs
• Providing input at the international level through evidence-based international interventions e.g. WHO
• INVOLVEMENT THROUGH SCIENCE DIPLOMACY
• Global regional workshops
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMRWho do “we” collaborate with and “how”?
Regional workshops: Latin America (2019); Asia
(2019); Eastern Europe (2019); Africa (2021)
Organising Committee
Dr. Kyeong Kyu Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea
Dr. Shoji Miyagawa, AMED, Japan
Dr. Yumiko Miyashita, AMED, Japan
Dr. Seon-Won Kim, NRF, Korea
Dr. Akhilesh K. Chaurasia, IAMRT, SKKU, Korea
Dr. Laura Plant, JPIAMR
Dr. Jie-ming Qu, Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong Univ., China
Program Committee
Dr. Marc Lemonnier, JPIAMR Scientific Advisory Board, France
Dr. You-Hee Cho, Cha University, Korea
Dr. Kunihiko Nishino, Osaka University, Japan
Dr. Xinshan Ye, Peking University, China
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMR
Dr. Aixin Yan, University of Hong Kong, Hong KongWay forward Page 72
• Register yourself for follow-up sessions on May 25, 2021
https://www.era-learn.eu/registration/second-era-learn-exchange-on-globalisation-of-european-
partnerships-may-25-2021/view
(access link from chat window!)
• Name additional topics if we missed something interesting
• Forward the registration link to EUROPEAN practitioners or stakeholders you consider appropriate for
discussions about it
• Let us know if you volunteer as a moderator for a specific session (please send to office@era-learn.eu)
• Send (links to) documents about good practices to office@era-learn.eu, if/where available
• The draft brief policy brief will be finalised
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsPage 73
Thank you -
Looking forward to seeing you on May 25!
The ERA-LEARN Team
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of PartnershipsYou can also read
