International Baccalaureate Middle Year Program Handbook 2021-2022

Page created by Amanda Hines
 
CONTINUE READING
International Baccalaureate Middle Year Program Handbook 2021-2022
International Baccalaureate
                       Middle Year Program Handbook
                                 2021-2022

                                   IB Mission Statement
The International Baccalaureate aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young
people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural
understanding and respect. To this end the organization works with schools, governments, and
international organizations to develop challenging programs of international education and
rigorous assessment. These programs encourage students across the world to become active,
compassionate, and lifelong learners who understand that other people, with their differences,
can also be right.

                     Middle Year Program Entrance Requirements
Downtown Doral Charter Upper School will be offering the International Baccalaureate (IB)
Middle Year Program for students in grades 6th-10th. To keep in alignment with the IB mission
statement, the Middle Year Program (MYP) does not exclude students from participating. The
Middle Year Program (MYP) is an all-inclusive program targeting all students in grades 6th-10th.
As an enrolled student at Downtown Doral Charter Upper School, in grades 6th-10th, the student
is automatically enrolled in the Middle Year Program (MYP)*.
       *The school holds the right to change entrance requirement for the Middle School Year
       at any given moment.

                                 Academic Honesty Policy
Academic honesty is a guiding principle of education and part of the cultural foundation of our
school community. Academic and personal integrity means doing the right thing even when no
one is looking. We encourage Downtown Doral Charter Upper School (DDCUS) students to lead
a life governed by the values of honesty and personal integrity in all their actions. This also
means upholding the academic honesty policies set forth by both DDCUS and the International
Baccalaureate Organization (IBO). Upholding academic honesty helps to ensure that all
International Baccalaureate Middle Year Program Handbook 2021-2022
students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge and skills they acquire
during their studies.
The policies and procedures in this page are informed by both the DDCUS mission and vision
and the attributes of the International Baccalaureate (IB) learner profile.

Academic Honesty and the IB Learner Profile

To meet the goals of the Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s mission and vision, as well as
the IB Mission Statement, all IB teachers and students subscribe to numerous ideals that make
up the IB Learner Profile.

   •   Inquirers
   •   Knowledgeable
   •   Thinkers
   •   Communicators
   •   Principled
   •   Open-Minded
   •   Caring
   •   Risk-Takers
   •   Balanced
   •   Reflective

The primary qualities of a principled individual include integrity and honesty. It is perhaps for
this reason that this is among the ten attributes valued by IB World Schools. It is this attribute
that guides the Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s International Baccalaureate Program
Academic Honesty Policy. To become more knowledgeable, IB World students use critical and
creative thinking skills to problem-solve and make reasoned, ethical decisions. Likewise, IB
World students are inquirers who nurture a love of learning. It would be counterproductive for
an IB World student to engage in academic dishonesty as doing so would rob the student of
true and meaningful academic growth and development. Fostering the development of
attributes such as being knowledgeable, thinkers, and inquirers complements the defining
characteristics of being principled.

Instructional Staff Responsibilities:

All subject area teachers have the obligation to instruct learners in the proper ways of
producing authentic work, beginning with an understanding of the IB learner profile. They must
ensure that students understand how to create original work through both research and
collaboration. Educators also need to make certain that students know how to properly cite
sources (including when paraphrasing) in order to avoid plagiarism. The teacher’s role further
includes helping IB learners to fully comprehend the Academic Honesty Policy and to provide
resources for them to use at home and in the classroom.
Additionally, Teachers and Coordinators must not engage in the following actions that
       could result in maladministration:

       •   The unauthorized rescheduling of an examination.
       •   Failing to keep exam papers secure prior to an examination.
       •   Providing undue assistance in the production of any work that contributes to the
           assessment requirements of the IB Diploma.
       •   Leaving candidates unsupervised during an examination.
       •   Allowing additional time in examinations without IBO approval.
       •   Releasing an examination paper, or disclosing information about the paper, within
           24 hours after the examination.

Student’s Responsibilities:

It is the student’s responsibility to produce and submit assignments that represent his or her
own work. When the ideas of others are included, this information must be properly cited.
Students should ask for assistance if they are uncertain about how to correctly acknowledge
sources. Learners are also accountable for understanding the Academic Honesty Policy and to
ask clarifying questions at any time, if needed. If students submit work that is not original
(intentionally or unintentionally), they must be willing to accept the appropriate consequences.

Family Responsibilities:

Parents and guardians are expected to understand and support DDCUS’ Academic Honesty
Policy. It is critical that they attend any meetings or conferences in reference to the academic
honesty of their student(s). Parents and guardians need to help their children abide by
expectations contained in the DDCUS Academic Honesty Policy and support them in the
understanding of what constitutes authentic work and proper citing of sources. Families who
observe any incidences of academic dishonesty are encouraged to report the incident to the
student’s teacher or administration.

Academic Honesty Committee (AHC) Responsibilities:

The Academic Honesty Committee is composed of DDCUS’ instructional staff and
administrators. The members of the AHC have the sole obligation of enforcing the Academic
Honesty Policy with integrity and consistency.

Practices of Authentic Authorship:

Paraphrase by using different words to restate another person’s ideas. Paraphrased ideas
usually have a sentence structure, style, and vocabulary different from the original author.
Paraphrasing is an acceptable way to use a source. However, because paraphrasing still uses
the ideas of another person, the source must be properly acknowledged.
Legitimate Collaboration by all team members and fair recognition is granted to all students
who collaborated for their work. The student must be able to understand their role in the
process of collaboration and be responsible for their specific work/task.

Proper Citation of intellectual property as per the approved formatting guidelines (APA) must
be used.

Academic Misconduct

The IB organization defines academic misconduct as behavior (whether deliberate or
inadvertent) that results in, or may result in, the candidate or any other candidate gaining an
unfair advantage in one or more components of assessment.

Examples of Academic Misconduct:

Cheating is defined as behavior that results in a student making a deliberate choice to gain an
unfair advantage in an assessment situation. An accomplice to cheating is someone who makes
the deliberate choice to help another individual cheat.

       Cheating includes but is not limited to:
          • Copying another student’s work (with or without his/her knowledge).
          • Copying assessment tasks.
          • Forgery.
          • Using unauthorized notes or other study aids during an assessment.
          • Submitting work as his/her own that has been copied.
          • Communicating with other students during an assessment.

Collusion is defined as behavior that provides another student with help in cheating.

       This help includes but is not limited to:
           • Giving intellectual property (their own or others) to a student with intent to
               cheat.
           • Providing information on how to obtain another student’s intellectual property.
           • Providing information on how to obtain assessment tasks (prior to examination).
           • Forging documents for another student.
           • Helping copy documents for another student.
           • Providing unauthorized notes to another student during an assessment.
           • Taking an online assessment or assignment under another student’s identity.

Duplication is defined as a student turning in the same work for different assessment tasks or
different subject areas. For example, a student cannot use his/her own summative work from a
unit in Language and Literature for a summative task in Science (unless an interdisciplinary unit
has been established by the teachers and they have created a singular assessment task).
Additionally, a student cannot use a summative task that he/she completed for Language as a
          freshman as a task in Language as a sophomore, even if the task is similar. In other words,
          students must produce new work (meeting requirements for authentic authorship) for each
          assessment task assigned throughout their academic careers.

          Plagiarism is “using words, ideas, or products which belong to another person or source,
          without giving credit to the source from which it was taken” (qtd. in Carroll 3). Plagiarism can
          occur when a person tries to represent another person’s work as his/her own in order to obtain
          some benefit, credit, or gain. However, plagiarism can also occur unintentionally if a person
          does not acknowledge the work of others that helped him/her to complete the assessment
          task. Regardless of the motivation, plagiarism is unacceptable and can be avoided with proper
          teaching and learning.

          Other Misconduct During an Examination Session:

               •    Including taking unauthorized material into an examination.
               •    Participating in behavior that disrupts or distracts other candidates.
               •    Disclosure of content of an examination paper within 24 hours of completion.
               •    Acquiring testing materials through any inappropriate means.
               •    Stealing an examination paper.

          Academic Consequences for Policy Breaches by Students:

          Academic misconduct constitutes a breach of regulations that could result in no grade being
          awarded in the subject concerned.

          Plagiarism and Collusion Infringement Chart
     Infringements                 Level 1 penalty                    Level 2 penalty                      Level 3 penalty
                           Warning letter to the student                50% mark                             Zero mark
                                    and parent(s)                  with resubmission                     with resubmission
Plagiarism                 Between 5-39 consecutive        Between 40–60 consecutive           More than 61 consecutive words
Copying external           words and incomplete            words and incomplete                copied and no acknowledgement of
sources.                   acknowledgement of copied       acknowledgement of copied           source(s) given.
                           source(s).                      source(s).
Peer plagiarism            Between 5-39 consecutive        Between 40–60 consecutive           More than 61 consecutive words
Copying work from          words and incomplete            words with no acknowledgement       copied or submitting somebody else’s
another student.           acknowledgement of copied       and/or attempt to cite the copied   work as one’s own.
                           source(s).                      source(s).
Peer plagiarism            Student took reasonable steps   Student took no steps to prevent    Student actively tried to sell their
Student lending or         to prevent their work being     their work being copied or          work to be submitted by others.
facilitating their work.   copied.                         actively encouraged the copying
                                                           of their work.
Collusion                  Work of students show close     Work of students has                Work of students has extensive
Coursework only and        similarity.                     similarities— less than 30%—        similarities—more than 31%—and/or
when working                                               and/or identical sections.          identical sections.
collaboratively.
Inclusion of             Minor offense as determined      Moderate offense as determined       Major offense as determined by the
inappropriate,           by the school administrator.     by the school administrator.         school administrator.
offensive, or obscene
material
Duplication of work      Not applicable.                  Presentation of the same work        Presentation of the same work for
                                                          for different assessment             different assessment components or
                                                          components or subjects. Partial      subjects. Complete reuse of
                                                          reuse of materials; penalties will   materials; penalties will be applied to
                                                          be applied to both subjects with     both subjects with reused materials.
                                                          reused materials.
Falsification of data    Not applicable.                  Presentation of work based on        Not applicable.
                                                          false or fabricated data.

          Examination Infringement Chart

     Infringements              Level 1 penalty                    Level 2 penalty                         Level 3 penalty
                         Warning letter to the student               50% mark                                Zero mark
                                 and parent(s)                   with resubmission                      with resubmission
Gaining access to        Not applicable.                  Not applicable.                      Candidate in possession of partial or
examination papers                                                                             complete live examination content.
before examination’s
scheduled time
Sharing of examination   Not applicable.                  Not applicable.                      Candidate sharing partial or complete
paper content before                                                                           live examination content through any
or during the                                                                                  means, including but not limited to,
examination’s                                                                                  email, text messages and the internet,
scheduled time, or                                                                             even when shared information is
within 24 hours after                                                                          general.
the examination
Assisting another        Not applicable.                  Before examination session.          During examination session.
student(s) in
committing an act of
academic misconduct

Failing to report an     Student is aware of the act of   Student is aware of the act of       Student is aware of the act of
incident of academic     misconduct via third party       misconduct via indirect              misconduct as a direct participant of
misconduct               unrelated during time and        association.                         the act.
                         place of act.

Possessing               In candidate’s possession but    In candidate’s possession but no     In candidate’s possession and
unauthorized material    surrendered or removed           evidence of it being used during     evidence of it being used during the
in the examination       during the first 10 minutes of   the examination.                     examination.
room                     the examination.
Exhibiting misconduct                   First non-compliance with the   Second non-compliance with the       Repeated noncompliance with the
or disruptive behavior                  invigilator’s instructions.     invigilator’s instructions.          invigilator’s instructions.
during an examination
IE: Exchanging, passing, obtaining or
attempting to receiving verbal or
written information from other
students during the examination
completion time.
Removal of secure                       Candidate accidently            Candidate attempting to remove       Candidate successfully removing
materials such as                       removing secure materials but   secure materials but identified by   secure materials from the
examination papers,                     identified by invigilators      invigilators before leaving          examination room.
questions and answer                    before leaving examination      examination room.
booklets, from the                      room.
examination room

                Investigation Infringement Chart

                                                  Infringements                                                  Level 3 Penalty
                                                                                                            Zero mark or No grade for
                                                                                                              subject(s) concerned
Not cooperating with an investigation, whether involved or not                                         When a student shows any of these
Providing misleading or demonstratively false information                                              behaviors and/or refuses to submit
Attempting to influence witnesses                                                                      a statement.
Showing threatening behavior to the person carrying out investigation or to witnesses

                Disciplinary Consequences for Policy Breaches by Students:

                Violations of the Academic Honesty Policy accumulate throughout a student’s tenure at
                Downtown Doral Charter Upper School and prior offenses are considered in assessing penalties.

                FIRST OFFENSE:

                       •       An issued infraction.
                       •       Notification to parent.
                       •       Informational referral to the student advisors and the IB coordinator.
                       •       If the offense occurs during an IB examination, the candidate will not receive an IB score
                               for the course.

                SECOND OFFENSE:

                       •       Detention.
                       •       Notification to parent.
                       •       Informational referral to the student advisors and the IB coordinator.
                       •       Conference with the teacher, an administrator, the IB coordinator, the counselor, the
                               student and the parent.
                       •       Potential placement on academic probation.
THREE OR MORE OFFENSES:

   •   Informational referral to the student advisors and the IB coordinator.
   •   Conference with the teacher, an administrator, the IB coordinator, the counselor, the
       student and the parent.
   •   Ineligibility for school trips, competitions, and/or activities. Refunds are not given when
       a student is denied attendance due to behavioral issues.
   •   Removal from or ineligibility for leadership positions, honor society membership, or
       other extra-curricular participation.
   •   Removal or suspension from sports teams and other teams and/or clubs representing
       Downtown Doral Charter Upper School.
   •   Potential removal from the class or program.

Retaking Examinations or Resubmitting Coursework:

The AHC will decide if the student found in breach of regulations will be allowed to retake
his/her examination or coursework, and when such a retake could take place.

Creation of Policy
The Academic Honesty Policy was created by a committee which consisted of the IB
coordinator, the head of schools, members of the administration, the entire administration,
and each department head/subject group representative. The following members formed part
of the policy making committee:

   •   Mrs. Acevedo-Isenberg- Head of Schools
   •   Ms. Chavez- IB Coordinator
   •   Ms. Orta- Lead Teacher
   •   Ms. Padilla- Instructional Coach
   •   Mr. Martinez- Athletic Director
   •   Ms. Moreno- Foreign Language Department Head
   •   Ms. Cabrera- ELA Department Head
   •   Ms. Wildenburg- Math Department Head
   •   Mr. Stone- Social Studies Department Head
   •   Ms. Novela- Performing Arts and Physical Education Department Head
   •   Ms. Martinez- Science Department Head

Informing Students, Parents, and Community
At the start of each academic year, Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s students are
expected to thoroughly read and sign the Academic Honesty Policy Acknowledgement, stating
that they understand and will abide by all regulations and consequences. Additionally, the
Academic Policy will form part of DDCUS’ IB Handbook, available for students, parents, and the
community via our school website.
Review of Policy
The Academic Honesty Policy will be reviewed annually during the first leadership team
meeting of the school year to ensure it is up to date with the principles and practices of DDCUS
and the IB organization.

                                       Language Policy
At Downtown Doral Charter Upper School, we believe that effective human communication in
oral or written form bridges gaps among different types of learners and creates human
connections around the world. We view language as a means to understand our diverse world
and develop intercultural understanding and respect.
Our language policy aims to provide the necessary skills required to inquire and explore a
variety of local and global concepts, express ideas fluently and effectively in a variety of models
of communication, respect other languages and cultures and accept different points of view in a
caring and professional manner.
Through the implementation of our language policy, our students will be able to evaluate their
own learning to determine their strengths and limitations in the process of language
acquisition.
At Downtown Doral Charter Upper School, we are committed to providing equity of access for
all our students. We promote an inclusive language learning environment. DDCUS recognizes
the diverse cultural and linguistic background of our students and their families and is
committed to providing an appropriate education for each of our students.

Primary Language of Instruction:

English is the primary Language of instruction. DDCUS will offer English at both the higher and
standard levels. The school will provide for inclusion and equity of access to our students,
including English Language Learners and students with special needs.

   •   DDCUS provides additional support in English language acquisition for our English
       Language Learners (ELLs). Our school follows MDCPS guidelines and has adopted the
       World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment (WIDA) as its assessment for students’
       English language proficiency.
   •   Students assessed as entering, beginning, developing, or expanding receive classroom
       instruction in English for speakers of other languages.
Required Bilingual Language Program:

In addition to the primary language of instruction, students have a choice of two language
tracks: Spanish or Portuguese.

   •   Within each track, there will be two programs based on level of language acquisition at
       the time of matriculation (determined by the Foreign Language Screening), the Bilingual
       Education Advancement Program (BEAP) and the Bilingual Education Studies Program
       (BESP).
   •   Students are required to complete the summer reading assignments for the language
       track of choice before the beginning of the academic school year depending on their
       track, BEAP or BESP.
   •   All students are expected to become fully bilingual and bi-culturally aware by the time
       they graduate, therefore, switching between tracks is not permitted.
   •   The Foreign Language Program includes one mandatory foreign language class and one
       mandatory foreign language humanities class per year.
   •   These courses are structured for complete language and culture immersion. They
       provide an opportunity for further support of a student’s mother tongue.
  •    Through these courses students embrace their own cultural heritage and learn about
       the cultures of other students by participating in a variety of cultural events and
       activities adopted into the curriculum as per each language track.
  •    Students in a language track that is not their mother tongue, will receive differentiation
       of instruction provided by the classroom teacher.
   •   If the school does not provide sufficient exposure to the student’s mother tongue in its
       regular program, the student will be recommended for the extended hour program, an
       after-school fee based tutoring service for further assistance.

Language Recognition:

Downtown Doral Charter Upper School is an official International Studies (IS) school. To form
part of the IS program means students of DDCUS, upon graduation of the 12th grade, will
receive a diploma from Spain, opening doors of possibilities and opportunities for international
study.

Instructional Staff Responsibilities:
   •   All teachers share responsibility in facilitating communication. Accordingly, all teachers
       will serve as language teachers and will ensure that various communication models are
       implemented in the classroom.
•   All teachers participate in continuous language training, beginning as early as the August
       (summer month) before the start of the school year.
   •   Academic language learning is integrated in the process of interdisciplinary planning
       across all curricula as evident in routine unit planning.

Creation of Policy
The Language Policy was created by a committee which consisted of the IB coordinator, the
head of schools, members of the administration team, and each department head/subject
group representative. The following members formed part of the policy making committee:

   •   Mrs. Acevedo-Isenberg- Head of Schools
   •   Ms. Chavez- IB Coordinator
   •   Ms. Orta- Lead Teacher
   •   Ms. Padilla- Instructional Coach
   •   Mr. Martinez- Athletic Director
   •   Ms. Moreno- Foreign Language Department Head
   •   Ms. Cabrera- ELA Department Head
   •   Ms. Wildenburg- Math Department Head
   •   Mr. Stone- Social Studies Department Head
   •   Ms. Novela- Performing Arts and Physical Education Department Head
   •   Ms. Martinez- Science Department Head

Informing Students, Parents, and Community:

At the start of each academic year, Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s students are
expected to thoroughly read the Language Policy and understand their responsibilities as
DDCUS student. Additionally, the Language Policy will form part of DDCUS’ IB Handbook,
available for students, parents, and the community via our school website.

   •   Parents are encouraged to join the school’s international Parent Organization (IPO).
   •   Through IPO, parents of students in either language track, organize involvement in
       school and community events.

Review of Policy

The Language Policy will be reviewed annually during the first leadership team meeting of the
school year to ensure it is up to date with the principles and practices of DDCUS and the IB
organization.
Access & Inclusion Policy
Downtown Doral Charter Upper School, alongside the IB organization, believes that all students
should be allowed to demonstrate their ability under assessment conditions that are as fair as
possible. In some cases, this will require access arrangements that eliminate disadvantages that
may prevent students from demonstrating their level of attainment.
According to the IB organization, access arrangements may be necessary due to:
• Long-term learning support requirements.
• Temporary medical conditions.
• Additional language learning.

The Access and Inclusion Policy is not only applicable during summative assessments but is to
be used during learning and teaching; this means that the policy must be used during classroom
instruction, classwork and related activities and tests. This policy must guide teachers in their
plans to meet the access requirements of students for all their work during their time at
Downtown Doral Charter Upper School. DDCUS is committed to working with parents,
educational specialists, teachers, and student services staff to ensure that all students reach
their maximum potential, regardless of exceptionality and/or condition.

Principles of Best Practice to Assist All Students in Accessing the Curriculum and
in Developing as a Whole Person
Affirming identity and building self esteem
        Students learn better in conditions that promote social and emotional growth.
        Welcoming diversity and developing the whole child through the IB Learner Profile best
        achieves this.
Valuing prior knowledge
        Learning occurs when students make relevant connections between their current
        knowledge and new knowledge. Through its transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary
        approaches, the MYP and DP programs build on what students know as they make
        connections across the curriculum.
Scaffolding
        Scaffolding instruction considers the student’s current ability to demonstrate knowledge
        and gradually builds from concrete to abstract understanding as supports are gradually
        removed and students become more independent in their learning.
Extending learning
        Providing students with several different ways to learn and practice a concept extends
        their learning and fosters a deeper understanding. It is important that students
        recognize opportunities for learning outside of the school setting to become life-long
        learners.
Response to Intervention
The Response to Intervention (RTI) process begins with either an observation conducted by the
parent or classroom teacher. The findings are reported to the appropriate counselor who then,
if applicable, formally implements the RTI process. RTI is a process designed to help schools find
the appropriate interventions, modifications, and/or accommodations a student requires.
During tier 1 of RTI the focus and purpose is high-quality classroom instruction. If a student is
not producing in this environment, he/she may proceed to tier 2. Tier 2 is targeted intervention
in small group setting lasting no longer than a quarter of the school year. If a student does not
show improvement or too little improvement while in tier 2, he/she moves into tier 3. Tier 3 is
intensive interventions and a possible comprehensive evaluation. In tier 3 a student receives
individualized intervention targeting their skill deficit. If progress is not made, the student is
referred for a comprehensive evaluation conducted by a medical professional for consideration
of services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act.

Accommodations/Modifications
Individualized Educational Plan (IEP)
        Students who show evidence of having an impairment via a psychological/psycho-
        educational/medical report are eligible for an IEP. A student’s IEP notes all
        accommodations and modifications provided to the student during instruction and
        testing. An IEP is issued for an extended period and reviewed annually to ensure
        accommodations and modifications are effective.
Section 504
        To be protected under section 504, a student must be determined to have a physical or
        mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. A 504 plan
        is generated by the school’s counseling department and includes modification offerings
        that allow for equal access to the curriculum for the student. Classroom and
        instructional accommodations are notated in the plan. 504 plans are issued for a period
        and reevaluated at the end date to determine if an extension is required.
Support
Support for students with special educational needs includes pull-out assistance, collaboration,
and/or consultation. A certified ESE teacher provides pull-out services during assessments.
During pull-out, a student can work in a small group setting. Collaboration and consultation
services are also provided by a certified ESE teacher. During collaboration, the ESE teacher
provides one-on-one help during class time for the subject and time stated in the student’s IEP.
During consultation, the ESE teacher consults with the general education teacher over the
student’s progress as well as discusses effective strategies.
Maintaining Standards:
Arrangement requests for a student does not give the student an advantage in any
assessments; the same standards of assessment are applied to all students. Access
arrangements do not diminish a student’s capacity to meet all assessment requirements during
their coursework. Access arrangements for assessments are to reflect the student’s learning
experience; therefore, students cannot request access arrangements at the time of assessment
but must do so with anticipation. All grades and marks are awarded based on student work
meeting set criteria without influence of any access arrangement a student may have. A
student capable of receiving a subject result for a course without access arrangement should
not request access arrangement for the assessment (exceptions can be made depending on the
circumstances). No exemption can be granted for language subjects; all students, including
those with specific learning challenges, are required to study two languages without any
exception.

Access Arrangements During the Course of Study:
The access arrangements provided to a student must be planned at the start or early on during
the course of study and be incorporated as the usual way to access classroom work and tests.
The access arrangements provided for a student must:
       • be carefully individualized, evaluated and monitored
       • reflect the optimal support that the student requires
       • be based on current, not past, requirements
       • be drawn upon teacher observations in the classroom
       • be strictly based on individual requirements

Requesting Access Arrangements for Assessments:
The IB coordinator is responsible for submitting an application for access arrangements on
behalf of a student with the support of the head of schools and consent from the student
and/or legal guardians.
Deadlines:

 Access arrangements for total    Submitted no later than one year before the examination
 vision impairment and hearing    session.
 challenges.
 All other requests for access    Submitted six months prior to an examination session.
 arrangements.
                                  By November 15th for candidates registering for the May
                                  examinations session/ by May 15th for candidates
                                  registering for the November examinations session.
•   All requests for inclusive access arrangements must be submitted on IBIS and must
       specify exactly which arrangements are being requested.
   •   Requests for inclusive access arrangements will take a minimum of four weeks to be
       processed. The same applies for requests for re-evaluation of decisions.
   •   If a request meets the standard eligibility criteria for the requested arrangement(s), the
       online tool will automatically approve the request.
   •   If a request does not meet the standard criteria, it will be referred to the IB organization
       for evaluation.
   •   Changes to access arrangements for anticipated and retake students would not
       normally be authorized.
   •   All requests for re-evaluation must be submitted within one month after the school has
       received the decision made by the IB upon processing the request.

Evidence Required:
To submit requests for access arrangements, DDCUS must submit a psychological/psycho-
educational/medical report or evidence from a language test for English Language Learners.
Additionally, DDCUS must submit educational evidence such as a letter/observational report
from the coordinator and/or the student’s subject teacher(s) outlining any difficulties that may
be apparent in class plus a summary about the arrangements provided to the candidate in
order to access learning and assessment. Educational evidence can also be provided by way of a
detailed individualized educational plan for the student, or a sample of work done under timed
conditions without the access arrangements that are being requested.
All supporting documentation must:
     • Be legible, on a document with a letterhead, signed and dated.
     • State the title, name, and professional credentials of the person(s) who has undertaken
        the testing.
     • State specifically the tests or techniques used.
     • Be consistent with the coordinator’s request for access arrangements.
     • Be accompanied by a translation into English, French or Spanish, if it is not written in
        one of these IB working languages.
All psychological/psycho-educational reports must:
     • State the candidate’s performance on nationally standardized psychological tests
        (where available and published, recent editions of standardized tests should be
        employed.)
     • Report results as standard scores, which have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of
        15, and not percentiles or age/grade equivalents.
     • It is not mandatory to test in all areas; the assessment may be in line with the
        candidate’s learning support requirements.
All language test reports for additional language learners must:
     • State the standardized language test used.
     • State the language proficiency and performance benchmark results (WIDA).
Administering Access Arrangements for Assessments:
DDCUS is responsible for making all arrangements for approving and appointing individuals
required to support an access arrangement (such as a prompter or reader). The person
providing support cannot be another student, a relative of the student, the subject group
teacher or a representative from an advisory service where a conflict of interest may be
apparent or perceived. DDCUS is also responsible for making all arrangements for assistive
technology required for access to learning and teaching and IB examinations.

     Access Arrangements Not Requiring                        Access Arrangements Requiring
                Authorization                                         Authorization
    •   Taking an examination in a separate            Access to Modification in the Presentation of
        room if it is in the best interests of the     the Examination
        student or other students in the group.        Candidates with visual challenges or specific
    •   Arranging for appropriate seating to           learning challenges may require modified
        meet the needs of the individual student.      presentation of the examinations. Candidates
    •   A care assistant.                              with total vision impairment may also need
    •   A student who normally uses an aid (such       questions adapted for accessibility (without
        as a colored overlay, colored filter lenses,   changing the learning outcome).
        a Braille slate, a sound amplification         Access to Additional Time
        device, a radio aid, a hearing aid, a visual   A student with a learning, physical, sensory,
        aid, or a magnifying aid).                     neurological, medical, or psychological challenge
    •   Use of buffers such as headsets, earplugs,     may request additional time during learning and
        and individual workstations with acoustic      teaching, and assessments. The amount of
        screens for students who are                   additional time is dependent on the severity of
        hypersensitive to sound.                       the challenge as determined by a medical
    •   A communicator for a student with              professional.
        hearing challenges.                            Access to Writing
    •   Clarified assessment directions for a          Candidates may require access arrangements
        student who has difficulties in reading or     to provide written responses. Difficulties in
        attention, examination directions may be       writing may arise due to specific learning
        clarified by the invigilator (examiner) or a
                                                       challenges, visual challenges, visual
        designated reader.
                                                       processing challenges, fine motor challenges,
    •   A designated person to name colors in an
        examination for a student who has color        attention challenges or other psychological
        blindness.                                     or medical challenges.
    •   Rest breaks if required due to medical,        Access to Reading
        physical, psychological, or other              Students may require support to read the
        conditions.                                    text in the assessments. Difficulties in reading
    •   A prompter due to attention issues,            text may arise due to learning challenges,
        psychological or neurological conditions.      visual processing challenges, attention
                                                       challenges, visual challenges or any other
                                                       medical issue that may affect vision.
                                                       Access to Practical Assistance
A student with a physical, sensory, or medical
                                                   challenge may require access to a practical
                                                   assistant for tasks that require physical
                                                   manipulation or movement unless it is the
                                                   task being tested.
                                                   Access to Calculators
                                                   If a student scores 90 or less in a test of
                                                   mathematical fluency, the student is eligible
                                                   to use a four-function calculator (basic
                                                   calculator performing only the functions of
                                                   addition, subtraction, multiplication, and
                                                   division).

*Students who require further access arrangements may request sign language interpreters
and augmentative communication devices if they are intended to form part of the student’s
regular learning.
   Exceptional Situations

   •   If a student presents evidence of a medical or psychological challenge that prevents the
       student from completing work on time, the student is eligible for extensions to
       deadlines. A request for an extension to a deadline must be received before the normal
       deadline.
   •   If a student presents evidence of a medical or psychological challenge that makes a
       deferral necessary for a student to access the program requirements, the student may
       defer one or more subjects. A request must be submitted at the start of the program
       and after registration for the assessment.
   •   A student may participate in a maximum of three assessment sessions to successfully
       attain their IB qualification.
   •   A student with a medical emergency may request the possibility of an alternative venue
       for testing. This situation is treated on a case-by-case basis and approval is not
       guaranteed.
   •   Reasonable adjustments are changes to the assessment process not covered with any
       other access arrangements. These adjustments are determined by the IB organization
       after reviewing a student’s unique requirements.

Access for English Language Learners
English Language Learners are students whose current course of study and assessment is
delivered in a language that is not their first, best or native language and whose language ability
is below the level that is deemed linguistically competent. The eligibility for access arrangements
will be based on WIDA scores conducted within one year of the assessment.
•   Access for English Language Learners does not apply to assessments in language and literature
       and language acquisition.
   •   In MYP, access for additional language learners can apply to examinations in individuals and
       societies, sciences, mathematics, arts, physical and health education, design, and the program
       core components.
   •   In DP, access for additional language learners can apply to oral or written examinations in
       individuals and societies, sciences, mathematics, the arts, and the DP/Career-related Program
       core components.

Creation of Policy
The Access and Inclusion Policy was created by a committee which consisted of the IB
coordinator, the head of schools, members of the administration team, and each department
head/subject group representative. The following members formed part of the policy making
committee:

   •   Mrs. Acevedo-Isenberg- Head of Schools
   •   Ms. Chavez- IB Coordinator
   •   Ms. Orta- Lead Teacher
   •   Ms. Padilla- Instructional Coach
   •   Mr. Martinez- Athletic Director
   •   Ms. Moreno- Foreign Language Department Head
   •   Ms. Cabrera- ELA Department Head
   •   Ms. Wildenburg- Math Department Head
   •   Mr. Stone- Social Studies Department Head
   •   Ms. Novela- Performing Arts and Physical Education Department Head
   •   Ms. Martinez- Science Department Head

Informing Students, Parents, and Community

The Access and Inclusion Policy forms part of DDCUS’ IB Handbook, available for
students, parents, and the community via our school website.

Review of Policy

The Access and Inclusion Policy will be reviewed annually during the first leadership team
meeting of the school year to ensure it is up to date with the principles and practices of DDCUS
and the IB organization.
Assessment Policy
Philosophy and Purpose
Downtown Doral Charter Upper School is dedicated to developing globally aware students -
intellectually, socially, and culturally by providing a broad and balanced education. The Middle
Years Program (MYP) and Diploma Program (DP) encourages students to make practical
connections between their studies and the real world, preparing them for success in further
study and in life. The Assessment Policy is a working document, developed by a committee of IB
teachers, leadership staff, and administration, to provide clear expectations for teachers,
families, students, staff, and administration regarding the assessment philosophy and practices
at DDCUS.
The primary purpose of assessments and examinations at DDCUS, is to support and encourage
student learning through the gathering and analysis of information on student performance.
Assessments and examinations in their various forms are a critical component of the
educational journey and provide students with opportunities to determine the degree to which
they have mastered content knowledge and skills, and to reflect on their progress. Assessments
and examinations also provide teachers the ability to determine the degree to which students
have attained mastery of content knowledge and skills, revise their curriculum and instruction
to meet student needs, and to reflect on their practices. Therefore, at DDCUS, assessments and
examinations are a means of ongoing communication between teachers, students, and families.

Teacher’s Assessment Responsibilities
   •   Prepare engaging and rigorous units/lessons and assessments.
   •   Use a variety of assessment tools.
   •   Ensure assessment correlates with unit objectives.
   •   Provide students with rubrics with anticipation.
   •   Ensure students understand assessment criteria.
   •   Provide appropriate access arrangements when required and become familiar with the
       Access and Inclusion Policy.
   •   Provide timely feedback.
   •   Provide and facilitate self-reflection time for students.
   •   Use professional judgment when evaluating a student’s level of achievement.
   •   Reflect on students’ performance and revise instruction where needed.
   •   Collaborate with colleagues teaching the same course to create units and assessments.
   •   Participate in on-going professional development.
Student’s Assessment Responsibilities
   •   Be accountable for their learning, asking for aid when needed and taking time to reflect
       on their academic progress.
•   Complete quality works and performances to the best of their ability.
   •   Proactively track grades and marks.
   •   Become familiar with the provided assessment rubric.
   •   Be aware of due dates and meet them.
   •   Uphold a culture of academic integrity by becoming familiar with the Academic Honesty
       Policy.
Professional Development
Downtown Doral Charter Upper School is committed to providing students with the most
innovative education available. To achieve this goal, teachers participate in continuous
professional developments. Two weeks prior to the start of the academic school year, DDCUS
begins its professional development workshops offering teachers training in instructional
strategies, technology, classroom management, and more. Teachers will continue to participate
in professional development trainings on-site during designated training days. MYP and DP
features are among these professional developments, securing time for teachers to discuss and
collaborate on issues such as assessment practices.

Collaboration
Downtown Doral Charter Upper School’s administration will provide teachers with a schedule
for frequent collaborate planning. Teachers instructing in the same course must collaborate on
all matters including assessments.

Assessment Practices
Assessment strategies are methods used to gather information about student’s learning. They
can be applied during the learning process or at the end of a unit to assess student
comprehension and achievement level. Assessments can also be given before a unit of study to
determine the student’s prior knowledge. The following are prominent assessment practices
found at DDCUS.

   •   Observations- teachers can assess student comprehension by engaging students in
       discussions or observing the whole class/individual student when completing tasks.
   •   Process Journals- facilitates student reflection. It is required in some MYP courses.
   •   Selected Responses- may be used during or at the conclusion of a unit in the form of
       quizzes and unit exams to measure student achievement and comprehension.
   •   Open-ended tasks- students elaborate on their understanding of specific prompts
       through discussions and/or written tasks.
   •   Performance tasks- Students are given an opportunity to demonstrate knowledge, skills,
       and understanding through creative presentations and project-based learning.
   •   iReady Diagnostic- conducted at the start, middle, and end of year to track student
       progress.
•   Mid-Year Assessments (MYA)- conducted annually to ensure timely progression of
       knowledge acquisition.
   •   Florida Standards Assessments (FSA) and End of Course Tests (EOC)- conducted annually
       to keep in compliance with state regulations.
   •   MYP eAssessments and portfolio- conducted at the end of the 5-year program to receive
       MYP certificate.
   • DP internal and external assessments- conducted at the end of the 2-year program
       assessing subject group and core (Theory of knowledge, extended essay, and creativity,
       activity, and service) of the program.
Assessment Types
Formative Assessments take place throughout the course of study. The purpose of formative
assessments is to provide students the experiences to successfully perform on summative
assessments.
      Examples:
          • Warm-ups
          • Exit slips
          • Portfolio
          • Quizzes
          • Observations
          • Process journals
Summative Assessments are open-ended task created by the teacher. The purpose of
summative assessments is to allow students to authentically demonstrate their knowledge and
comprehension. It is student centered and inquiry based. Summative assessments are
conducted at the end of a unit.
       Examples:

          • Performance tasks
          • Projects
          • Assessment tasks
Formative and Summative Assessment:
   ● Align with each subject group’s aims and objectives, as well as the Florida State
     Standards.
   ● Connect to the different IB learner profiles attributes.
   ● Are diverse in method.
   ● Foster student inquiry and exploration.
   ● Are grounded in real-world applications.
   ● provide students multiple opportunities to display knowledge.
● Are frequent and ongoing.
   ● provide students with timely and meaningful feedback.
Grading and Marking
Downtown Doral Charter Upper School has adopted the following grading category
percentages:

   • 60% Test, Quizzes, Projects
   • 30% Classwork
   • 10% Homework
Achievement Levels describe the level of performance for a student on a summative
assessment. The following chart shows the grade equivalent per achievement levels.
  Achievement Level         Percent Score
                                                *0 is assigned to work that does not meet
          8                     95-100
                                                criteria. 0 is not the equivalent of missing
          7                      90-94          assignment. Missing assignments will receive
          6                      85-89          no grade. Students are encouraged to re-do
          5                      80-84          summative work with a 0-achievement level.
          4                      75-79
          3                      70-74
          2                      65-69
          1                      60-64                    Sum                 Subject Grade
          0                       59-0                     1-5                       1
                                                          6-9                      2
                                                         10-14                     3
Subject Grades represent a holistic level of                15-18                    4
achievement in each subject. To determine a                 19-23                    5
student’s 1-7 subject grade, the teacher                    24-27                    6
considers all summative evidence of learning a              28-32                    7
student has provided in each criterion. This is
not an average of all achievement levels; it is an accurate representation of the common trend
and determined by teacher judgement. The 4 criteria are added together and using the grade
boundary chart, the final 1-7 subject grade is assigned.

Reporting
Assessments are critical tools used to develop effective teaching and should provide parents,
teachers, and administrators with information to support student learning. DDCUS effectively
communicates with parents and students by:

   •   Providing students with copies of marked rubrics for criteria assessed.
   •   Sending updates to alert students and parents of important assessment dates.
•   Distributing interim numerical grade reports every 4.5 weeks and report cards every 9
       weeks.
   •   Hosting parent information sessions regarding standardized tests and other MYP/DP
       assessments.
   •   Using an online grade book to allow parents continual live access to student’s grades.
   •   Facilitating individual student / parent conferences that are scheduled upon parental or
       teacher request.

Creation of Policy
The Assessment Policy was created by a committee which consisted of the IB coordinator, the
head of schools, members of administration team, and each department head/subject group
representative. The following members formed part of the policy making committee:

   •   Mrs. Acevedo-Isenberg- Head of Schools
   •   Ms. Chavez- IB Coordinator
   •   Ms. Orta- Lead Teacher
   •   Ms. Padilla- Instructional Coach
   •   Mr. Martinez- Athletic Director
   •   Ms. Moreno- Foreign Language Department Head
   •   Ms. Cabrera- ELA Department Head
   •   Ms. Wildenburg- Math Department Head
   •   Mr. Stone- Social Studies Department Head
   •   Ms. Novela- Performing Arts and Physical Education Department Head
   •   Ms. Martinez- Science Department Head

Informing Students, Parents, and Community

The Assessment Policy forms part of DDCUS’ IB Handbook, available for students,
parents, and the community via our school website.

Review of Policy

The Assessment Policy will be reviewed annually during the first leadership team meeting of the
school year to ensure it is up to date with the principles and practices of DDCUS and the IB
organization.
Personal Project

During year 5 of the Middle Year Program, students complete the
personal project. Through this project, they will continue to explore
the IB approaches to learning skills and learner profile. Students
select an area of interest to focus on and with an assigned project
supervisor, produce a creative product to demonstrate the learning.
The personal project explores the cycle of inquiry, action, and
reflection, as seen in the diagram below. (Photo credits of the IB
Organization.)

The personal project must not form part of the direct curriculum of
any subject group. Each student will receive a project supervisor to help them through the process.
Students may also decide to seek the aid of a community member that adds to their learning process.
Students are to spend a minimum of 25 hours on their personal project.

Components to be Evaluated

                    Component                                         How it is assessed
          Focus on topic leading towards a                    Evident in the presentation/report
                 product/outcome
                  Process Journal                                  Extracts from the journal
                      Report                                            Four objectives

                                        Community Service

Community involvement serves to develop essential qualities in a student. These qualities, as
described by the IB, include self-awareness of strength and areas of growth, taking initiative,
perseverance in action, collaborative working, and international mindedness. Downtown Doral
Charter Upper School is committed to creating opportunities for students to become global
leaders as they explore these important qualities. To achieve this, our students are encouraged
to serve the community with an expectation of a minimum of 25 hours of community service by
graduation.

                                     Awarding of Certificate

Students seeking recognition of program completion, must achieve all components of the
Middle Year Program. These components include:

    1. Passing score on all subject groups
    2. Passing score on Personal Project
    3. Evidence of community service through action
You can also read