Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) Cultivation Using Sawdust and Different Organic Manures - Asian Food Science ...

Page created by Doris Neal
 
CONTINUE READING
Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) Cultivation Using Sawdust and Different Organic Manures - Asian Food Science ...
Asian Food Science Journal

                            20(5): 67-74, 2021; Article no.AFSJ.67355
                            ISSN: 2581-7752

   Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) Cultivation
       Using Sawdust and Different Organic Manures
                   O. A. Orngu1*, I. E. Mbaeyi-Nwaoha1, B. O. Unagwu2 and V. E. Etim3
                  1
                   Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
                                    2
                                      Department of Soil Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
                3
                 National Biotechnology Development Agency, South East Center, University of Nigeria,
                                                                                         Nsukka, Nigeria.

                                                                                             Authors’ contributions

        This work was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Author OAO designed the study,
        performed the statistical analysis, wrote the protocol and wrote the first draft of the manuscript.
          Authors IEMN and BOU supervised the study. Author VEE managed the literature searches.
                                                     All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

                                                                                                   Article Information

                                                                                     DOI: 10.9734/AFSJ/2021/v20i530299
                                                                                                                   Editor(s):
                                                                   (1) Dr. Chouitah Ourida, University of Mascara, Algeria.
                                                                                                                 Reviewers:
                                                                                                         (1) Hari Om, India.
                                                            (2) B. N. Hazarika, College of Horticulture and Forestry, India.
                                            Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/67355

                                                                                       Received 07 February 2021
                                                                                          Accepted 15 April 2021
  Original Research Article
                                                                                          Published 23 April 2021

ABSTRACT

 Aims: The aim was to evaluate the performance of cultivating oyster mushroom (Pleurotus
 ostreatus) using sawdust and different organic manures.
 Study Design: The experimental design used was the complete randomized design (CRD) and
 the Data obtained was subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Turkey’s Least
 Significant Difference(LSD) test to compare treatment means; differences was considered
 significant at 95% (P≤0.05) (SPSS Version 21 software).
 Place and Duration of Study: National Biotechnology Development Agency, South East Center,
 University of Nigeria, Nsukka between September 2019 and November 2019.
 Methodology: Saw dust was prepared as substrate with different organic manures and coded SD,
 Saw dust; SDP, Sawdust+ Poultry; SDC, Saw dust + cow dung; SDD, Saw dust+ pig dung) in the
 ratio of 100:0 and 50:50 respectively to cultivate oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus).
 Subsequently, the rate of growth, time of harvest, yield and average weight were recorded and
 proximate composition determined using standard methods.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

*Corresponding author: Email: africaorngu@gmail.com, africaorngu@yahoo.com;
Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) Cultivation Using Sawdust and Different Organic Manures - Asian Food Science ...
Orngu et al.; AFSJ, 20(5): 67-74, 2021; Article no.AFSJ.67355

 Results: Oyster mushroom harvested showed Moisture content ranged (4.63-7.14%), ash content
 (4.84-6.77%), crude fat (0.98-3.28%), fiber (16.02-18.23%), protein (19.27-33.41%) and
 carbohydrate (38.18%-48.89%). Average weight yield was highest in saw dust substrate (10.2g)
 with total yield (980g) and least average weight (7.5g) and total yield (105g) in sawdust and poultry
 litters substrate. Oyster mushroom from all the substrate differed significantly (p
Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) Cultivation Using Sawdust and Different Organic Manures - Asian Food Science ...
Orngu et al.; AFSJ, 20(5): 67-74, 2021; Article no.AFSJ.67355

   Table 1. Substrate formulation for oyster              the method described by Okeke et al. [9]. The
             mushroom cultivation                         fresh mushroom was cleaned properly to remove
                                                          dirt and damaged portion. The fresh mushroom
 Substrate                       Ratio                    was blanched in hot water at 32°C for three
 SD                              100:0                    minutes, which contained 3% salt and 0.01%
 SDP                             50:50                    citric acid. Then, water was drained, and the
 SDC                             50:50                    mushroom dried in an oven at temperature of
 SDD                             50:50                    105°C for 3 hours. The dried mushroom was
  Key: SD, Saw dust; SDP, Sawdust+ Poultry liters;        milled in the laboratory using hammer mill and
SDC, Saw dust + cow dung; SDD, Saw dust+ pig dung         passed through a 60-inch mesh sieve (British
2.2.1 Sterilization                                       Standard Screen) and packaged in a low-density
                                                          polyethylene bag, stored in the refrigerator (4 °C)
The bagged substrates in 10×12 polyethylene               until required for use.
were sterilized in autoclave for 15 minutes prior
to inoculation at the temperature of 121°C to
eliminate any microbial contamination and
allowed to cool overnight [8].

2.2.2 Inoculation of substrate

Inoculation   was     done    after  sterilization
aseptically into the sterilized bags of the
substrate. Ten grams (10g) of spawn was
weighed and inoculated to each substrate and
tied up and taken into a dark room for mycelium
colonization/ growth at 25°C - 30°C and 90%
relative humidity. Within seven days, mycelium
colonization or spawn run was observed. The
spawn run time depend on the size of the bag,
amount of spawn used, the strain used and the
temperature.

2.2.3 Fructification

After 25 days, substrate bags that were ramified
completely were moved to mushroom growth
chamber for photosynthesis to enable sprouting
and fructification. Tiny holes were created on the
polyethylene bags using a wire. The polyethylene
bags were opened and watered with 3 ml of
water each using different syringes daily to avoid
cross-contamination. Environmental conditions
such as temperature, ventilation, light and
humidity are necessary for fructification.
2.2.4 Harvesting/Packaging                                     Fig. 1. Flow chart for the preparation of
                                                                          mushroom powder
Fresh mushroom was harvested on maturation                                 Source: Okeke et al. [9]
was carefully by hand from the substrate bags
after 31 days of inoculation. The harvested               2.3 Analysis
mushroom fruits were weighed, recorded and
oven dried at 45oC, to ensure phyto-chemicals             2.3.1 Determination of moisture content
are not lost.
2.2.5 Processing of mushroom powder                       This was determined in triplicate by hot air oven
                                                          method in an indirect distillation method.
The oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus)                 According to AOAC [10] method, three grams (3
powder was processed in the laboratory using              g) each of the product sample was weighed (W 2)

                                                     69
Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) Cultivation Using Sawdust and Different Organic Manures - Asian Food Science ...
Orngu et al.; AFSJ, 20(5): 67-74, 2021; Article no.AFSJ.67355

using a digital balance into a cleaned, dried,            transferred into a pre-weighed evaporated dish.
cooked and weighed crucible (W 1). The sample,            The petroleum ether was recovered by
which was in the crucibles, was transferred into a        evaporation using a bath and the remaining fat in
hot air oven at 150ºC and dried for 2 hours. The          the flask was dried in the oven at 80ºC for 30
crucible was weighed periodically until constant          minutes and cooled in a desiccator and finally
weights (W3) was obtained. The percentage of              weighed using digital balance. The difference in
moisture was calculated as follows:                       the weight of the empty flask and the flask with
                                                          oil (C) gave the oil content was calculated as
% Moisture = W 2- W3 x 100                                percentage fat content:
              W 2-W1 1
Where;                                                         % Crude fat =       C − B x 100
                                                                                     A      1
W1 = Initial weight of empty crucible;
W2 = Weight of crucible + food before drying              A = Weight of sample
W3 = Final weight of crucible + food after drying;        B = Weight of empty flask
% Total solid (dry matter) = 100 - % moisture             C = Weight of flask + oil

2.3.2 Determination of crude fibre                        2.3.4 Determination of crude protein

The crude fibre was determined using the                  The crude protein content of the sample was
method described by AOAC [10]. Two grams (2               determined by the semi-micro Kjeldahl technique
g) of each of the sample (W1) was weighed on a            as described by AOAC [10]. One gram (1.0 g) of
digital balance, boiled underreflux for 30 minutes        the sample was put into a Kjeldahl flask and 3.0
with 200 ml of a solution containing1.25 g of             g of hydrated cupric sulphate (catalyst) was
H2SO4 per 100 ml of solution which was put into           added in the flask. Then, 20 ml of anhydrous
a 250ml beaker. Then, filtered through a muslin           sodium sulphate and 1.0 g of concentrated
cloth on a fluted tunnel and heated with hot water        tetraoxosulphate VI acid (H2SO4) was added to
for 2 times. The residue was transferred into a           digest the samples, which was topped and
250 ml beaker and boiled for 30 minutes with 200          swirled. The flask and liquid was clear and free of
ml of a solution containing 1.25 g of carbonate           coloration. The clear solution was cooled and
free of NaOH per 100ml. The final residue was             made up to 100 ml with distilled water and a
then filtered through a muslin cloth and dried            digest of 5 ml was collected for distillation. Then,
using a hot-air oven (GallenKamp oven, United             5 ml of 60% sodium hydroxide solution (NaOH)
Kingdom). The final residue was ashed in a                was put into the distillation flask and distilled for
furnace and put into the desiccator to cool and           some minutes. Boric acid indicator absorbed the
weighed (W3) using a digital balance;                     ammonia which was distilled off and this was
                                                          titrated with 0.1 ml hydrochloric acid (HCl). The
   % Crude fiber =       W2-W3 x 100                      titer value or the end point at which the colour
                         W1                               changes from green to pink was taken. The
                                                          crude protein was calculated as:
W1 = Weight of the sample
W2= Weight of the sample before ashing                         Percentage crude protein = 0.001410 x 6.25
W3 = Weight after ashing                                       x 25 x T x 100
                                                          Where: T = Titre value
2.3.3 Determination of crude fat
                                                          2.3.5 Determination of ash content
Crude fat was determined using Soxhlet
extraction method as described by AOAC [10]. A            Ash was determined in a muffle furnace as
250 ml clean boiling flask (B) was dried in an            described by AOAC [10]. Crucibles were heated
oven at 100ºC using hot air oven. Three gram (3           in an oven for five minutes to eliminate moisture,
g) of the sample (A) was weighed (using a digital         cooled in desiccators and weighed. Two grams
balance, Model number: No.T 320N) into thimble.           of the sample was amassed into a crucible,
The thimble and its content were placed in the            heated over a Bunsen burner to char after which
extraction apparatus and extraction was with              complete ashing is conducted in a muffle furnace
                                                                          o
ethyl ether in Soxhlet extractor for 6–8 h at a           at about 600 C for 6 hours. The heating
condensation rate of at 3–6 drops per second.             continued until whitish grey ash was left in the
During this process, the fat was extracted and            crucible. The crucible was removed from the

                                                     70
Orngu et al.; AFSJ, 20(5): 67-74, 2021; Article no.AFSJ.67355

furnace, cooled in a desiccator and re-weighed to           3.2 Oyster Mushroom Fructification,
obtain the weight of ash.                                       Maturation and Harvest Time
Calculation:                                                Pre-mordial formation (fruiting bodies) was first
                                                            observed after 3 days in the open mushroom
Percentage ash =                                            chamber in substrate SD and SDD. This was 28
weight of crucible +ash − weight of crucible x 100          days after inoculation with substrate SDC and
                 Weight of sample                           substrate SDP just sprouting with no fruiting
                                                            bodies. This could be attributed to the nutrient
2.3.6 Determination of carbohydrate content                 composition of the organic manures used with
                                                            saw dust.
The determination of the carbohydrate content of
the product was obtained by difference as                   The first flush which is matured fruiting bodies
described by Ihekoronye and Ngoddy [11]. This               was harvested firstly in SD and SDD. This was
was done by subtraction of the sum of moisture,             after 31 days of inoculation and six days of
ash, protein, fibre and fat from the total weight of        removal from the dark room to the open
100.                                                        mushroom chamber. Fruiting was just recorded
                                                            in substrate SDC and substrate SDP. It took 38
% Carbohydrate = 100 – (% moisture + ash +                  days after inoculation and 13 days in the open
protein + fibre + fat)                                      mushroom chamber to harvest the first flush in
                                                            substrate SDP. Meanwhile substrate SDC took
2.4 Experimental Design and Statistical                     45days after inoculation and 20 days in the open
                                                            mushroom chamber to harvest the first flush. The
    Analysis
                                                            time from inoculation to harvest indicate the
                                                            performance of saw dust along the different
The Experimental design was based on
                                                            organic manures used as substrate for growth of
complete randomized design(CRD) and data
                                                            oyster mushroom. The growth performance in
analyzed    using    one-way     analysis    of
                                                            substrate SD and SDD can be attributed to the
variance (ANOVA) and mean separation by
                                                            chemical composition. This study agreed with
Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test. Statistical
                                                            Tsegaye and Tefera [13] who observed
Package for Service Solution (SPSS) version 21
                                                            that the number of fruit bodies recorded is
software was used and significance accepted at
                                                            related to their mycelia colonization. The
p
Orngu et al.; AFSJ, 20(5): 67-74, 2021; Article no.AFSJ.67355

poultry litter) had only one(1) flush each. This is        ash content of 4.91% with 6.45% in substrate
as shown in Table 2.                                       SDD. The oyster mushroom samples cultivated
                                                           on the substrate differed significantly (p
Orngu et al.; AFSJ, 20(5): 67-74, 2021; Article no.AFSJ.67355

      Table 3. A proximate composition of oyster mushroom grown on different substrate

 Substrate Moisture          Ash           Crude fat          Crude Fibre            Protein          Carbohydrate
           %                 %             %                  %                      %                %
                     a                d              a                   a                      d                a
 SD        4.63±0.04         6.77±0.02     0.98±0.28          16.02±0.01             33.41±0.01       38.18±0.02
 SDP       7.14±0.01d        4.84±0.01a    3.28±0.01d         18.14±0.01c
                                                                                     20.45±0.07b      46.15±0.07c
                     c                b              c                   d                      a                d
 SDC       6.30±0.01         4.91±0.00     2.39±0.01          18.23±0.01             19.27±0.01       48.89±0.00
 SDD       5.22±0.00b        6.45±0.00c    1.86±0.00b         17.10±0.01c
                                                                                     26.92±0.07c
                                                                                                      42.43±0.02b
  Key: SD, Saw dust; SDP, Sawdust + Poultry liters; SDC, Saw dust + cow dung; SDD, Saw dust + pig dung

significantly (p
Orngu et al.; AFSJ, 20(5): 67-74, 2021; Article no.AFSJ.67355

       Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2004;3:158-               15.    Adejumo TO, Awosanya OB. Proximate
       160.                                                            and mineral composition of four edible
8.     Falana MB, Bankole MO, Omemu AM,                                mushroom species from South Western
       Oyewole OB. Microorganisms associated                           Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology.
       with supernatant solution of fermented                          2005;4(10):1084 1088.
       maize mash (Omidum) from two varieties                   16.    Bhattacharjya DK, Paul RK, Miah MN,
       of maize grains. Journal of Research.                           Ahmed KU. Comparative study on
       2011;3(7):1-7.                                                  nutritional composition of oyster mushroom
9.     Okeke JNC, Ozumba AU, Olatunji OO,                              (Pleurotus ostreatus fr.) cultivated on
       Odunfa SA. Effect of drying methods on                          different sawdust substrates. Journal of
       some qualities of Nigerian Pleurotus                            Bioresearch        Communication.       2015;
       pulmonarius mushroom powder. Nigerian                           1(2):93-98.
       Food Journal. 2003;21:137-143.                           17.    Duru M, Eboagwu I, Kalu W, Odika P.
10.    AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis 18th                         Nutritional, anti-nutritional and biochemical
       edition, Revision 3, Association of Official                    studies on the oyster mushroom, Pleurotus
       Analytical Chemists. Washington DC;                             ostreatus”. EC Nutrition. 2018;14(1):
       2010.                                                           36-59.
11.    Ihekoronye AI, Ngoddy PO. Integrated                     18.    Kurtzman RH. Mushrooms: Sources of
       food science and technology for the                             modern western medicines. Micologia
       tropics. Macmillan Publishers, London.                          Aplicada       International.     2005;17(2):
       1985;368-369.                                                   21-33.
12.    Peter OE, Peter GR, Obele II, Owuna G,                   19.    Jonathan SG, Okon CB, Oyelakin AO,
       Danladi MM, Obiekieze S, Akwashiki O.                           Oluranti OO. Nutritional values of oyster
       Utilization of some agro-wastes for                             mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) (Jacq. Fr.)
       cultivation of Pluerotus ostreatus (Oyster                      Kumm cultivated on different agricultural
       Mushroom) in Keffi Nigeria. Frontiers in                        wastes. Nature and Science. 2012;
       Environmental Microbiology. 2019;5(2):60-                       10(9):186-179.
       69.                                                      20.    Saiful MDI. Cultivation techniques of edible
13.    Tsegaye Z, Tefera G. Cultivation of oyster                      mushrooms: Agaricus bisporus, Pleurotus
       mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus Kumm,                             spp, Lentinulaedodes and Volvariella
       1871) using agro-industrial residues.                           volvocea. The magic of mushroom and
       Journal of Applied Microbiology Research.                       mould biology; PHP-50306. Wageningen
       2017;1(1):15- 20.                                               University, Netherlands; 2013.
14.    Fasidi IO, Kadiri M, Jonathan SG,                        21.    Tasvina RB. Mushroom in biodiversity and
       Adenipekun CO, Kuforiji OO. Cultivation of                      food security of Sikkimm. ICAR Research
       edible     tropical mushrooms.      Ibadan                      complex Sakkim Centre, Department of
       University Press. 2008;81.                                      Plant protection; 2013.

© 2021 Orngu et al.; This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.

                                            Peer-review history:
                        The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here:
                              http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/67355

                                                           74
You can also read