Review of Competitive RDI Calls - Forum for Applicants and Evaluators on calls promoting domestic innovation
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Mintacím szerkesztése
Review of Competitive RDI Calls
Forum for Applicants and Evaluators
on calls promoting domestic innovation
József Pálinkás, President
Budapest, 6 February 2018
Coordination of resources in a competitive
Mintacím szerkesztése
funding system The power of excellence
• coordinated management, flexible planning,
complex portfolio of calls
• well-balanced support to discovery research,
experimental development and innovation
• novel content, international competitiveness,
sustainability
• challenge-oriented rather than source-oriented
project funding
• practical applicability and marketability of RDI
results
Stakeholders of value-creating innovation Mintacím szerkesztése
Mintacím
The szerkesztése
system of RDI sources
Cohesion policy
instruments
Direct access to
Domestic sources international funding
Structural Funds
National Research, European Social Fund
Development and European Regional Horizon 2020
Innovation Fund Development Fund framework programme
Operational Programmes
Economic Development and Innovation
EUR 178.5 million
Operational Programme (EDIOP, in
approx. HUF 80 bn per year (approx. HUF 53.5 bn)
Hungarian: GINOP)
awarded to Hungarian businesses
Competitive Central-Hungary Operational
and research centres since 2014
Programme (CCHOP, in Hungarian:
VEKOP)
approx. HUF 750 bn between 2014 and 2020EU fundsszerkesztése
Mintacím available to SMEs by thematic priority
RDI
HUF 424.0 bn
20%
Training Classic SME
HUF 73.0 bn development
4% 43%
Total HUF 913.0 bn
7% HUF 2,120 bn
ICT
HUF 156.0 bn
6%
Energy SOURCE:
Palyazat.gov.hu
HUF 125.0 bn 20%
Partnership agreement
Employment
HUF 429.0 bnTarget groups,
Mintacím calls and funding decisions in the
szerkesztése
RDI calls (2015–2017)Mintacím szerkesztése
APPLICANTSAggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím szerkesztése
* Structural Funds – EDIOP 128,1
711,6
Corporate/business National Research, Development and Innovation Fund 55,7
187,2
RDI Activities
** Structural Funds – CCHOP 16,5
78,6
Structural Funds – EDIOP 123,2
426,6
Knowledge National Research, Development and Innovation Fund 63,6
123,9 Total budget
Transfer Total budget for refundable funding
Structural Funds – CCHOP 4,6
8,9 Awarded funding
129,6 Total requested funding
Structural Funds – EDIOP 295,5
Research
Infrastructure Structural Funds – CCHOP 10,0
31,2
8,5
International RDI National Research, Development and Innovation Fund 30,4
* Two funding schemes are currently pending evaluation at the MA 0,0 500,0 [HUF bn] 1 000,0
** One funding scheme is currently pending evaluation at the MAAggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím szerkesztése
* Structural Funds – EDIOP 1030
6403
Corporate/business 322
National Research, Development and Innovation Fund 934
RDI Activities
** Structural Funds – CCHOP 84
876
National Research, Development and Innovation Fund 309
966
Knowledge Structural Funds – EDIOP 102
304 Funded project proposals
Transfer
Submitted project proposals
National Research, Development and Innovation Fund 65
127
Structural Funds – CCHOP 8
Research 17
Infrastructure Structural Funds – EDIOP 101
266
Structural Funds – CCHOP 30
International RDI 96
* Two funding schemes under evaluation by the Managing Authority 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
** One funding scheme under evaluation by the Managing AuthorityAggregate
Mintacím data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
szerkesztése
Calls fostering innovative businesses I.
Support of business RDI activities 77,2
364,7
Structural Funds Prototype, product, technology and service development 44,7
169,2
EDIOP
Innovation ecosystem (start-up and spin-off) 4,7
25,7
Support of independent business RDI activities 48,4
171,3
National Research,
Support for export oriented R&D activities of domestic 4,8
Development and businesses 7,0 Total budget
Innovation Fund 1,5 Awarded funding
Innovation ecosystem (start-up) 7,3
Total requested funding
Support of business RDI activities 15,4
44,9
Structural Funds
CCHOP Prototype, product, technology and service development 1,1
33,7
0,0 100,0 200,0 300,0 [HUF bn] 400,0Aggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím
Calls fosteringszerkesztése
innovative businesses I.
Support of business RDI activities 259
1103
Structural Funds Prototype, product, technology and service development 718
2688
EDIOP
Innovation ecosystem (start-up and spin-off) 8
44
Support of independent business RDI activities 227
758
National Research, Funded project proposals
Development and Support for export oriented R&D activities of domestic 9
businesses 13 Submitted project proposals
Innovation Fund
Innovation ecosystem (start-up) 3
15
Support of business RDI activities 62
Structural Funds 217
CCHOP 22
Prototype, product, technology and service development 659
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000Aggregate
Mintacím data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
szerkesztése
Calls fostering innovative businesses II.
Support of exportable innovative product development for 1,2
innovation-driven export expansion 1,2
Support of business RDI activities through combined credit 0,2
89,8
Support of intellectual property rights activities 0,1
Structural Funds 0,3
EDIOP 0,0 Total budget
Innovation voucher 0,1
Total budget for refundable funding
Support of business RDI activities - Loan programme 0,0 Awarded funding
37,0
Total requested funding
Enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs through adaptive 0,0
technological innovation 23,7
Creation of an ecosystem for technology start-ups 0,9
National Research, 1,3
Development and 0,1
Support of intellectual property rights activities 0,2
Innovation Fund
0,0 40,0 80,0 [HUF bn] 120,0Aggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím szerkesztése
Calls fostering innovative businesses II.
Support of exportable innovative product development for 3
innovation-driven export expansion 4
Support of business RDI activities through combined credit 2
350
Support of intellectual property rights activities 33
Structural Funds 100
EDIOP Innovation voucher 7
13
Funded project proposals
Support of business RDI activities - Loan programme 0 Submitted project proposals
39
Enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs through adaptive 0
technological innovation 2062
National Research, Creation of an ecosystem for technology start-ups 13
21
Development and
Support of intellectual property rights activities 70
Innovation Fund 127
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Aggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím szerkesztése
Participation in international cooperation
National Research, Development and
2,5
Bilateral cooperation
13,7
2,0
Support of participation in joint EU initiatives
Innovation Fund
2,3
0,8 Total budget
Support of Hungarian participation in the EUREKA programme
2,7 Awarded funding
Total funding request
National complementary support to Hungarian projects under the 0,1
Horizon 2020 SME Instrument – 2015 0,1
Support of participation in the EU’s H2020 programme and other 0,1
joint programmes 0,2
0,0 4,0 8,0 12,0 [HUF bn] 16,0Aggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím szerkesztése
Participation in international cooperation
National Research, Development
Bilateral cooperation 186
710
and Innovation Fund
Support of participation in joint EU initiatives 27
30
Support of Hungarian participation in the EUREKA programme 13 Funded project proposals
50
Submitted project proposals
National complementary support to Hungarian projects under the 28
Horizon 2020 SME Instrument – 2015 35
Support of participation in the EU’s H2020 programme and other 41
joint programmes 93
0 200 400 600 800Aggregate
Mintacím data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
szerkesztése
Calls fostering cooperation between businesses and research centres
R&D competitiveness and excellence cooperation 96,4
Structural Funds 370,7
EDIOP Higher education and Industrial Cooperation Centre – 26,9
Research infrastructure development 55,9
National competitiveness and excellence programme – 2016 28,0
61,0
Competitiveness and excellence cooperation – 2017 16,7
37,5 Keretösszeg
National Research,
10,0 Megítélt támogatás
Development and National excellence programme – 2017 10,0 Teljes forrásigény
Innovation Fund Higher education and Industrial Cooperation Centre – 8,0
Research infrastructure development 14,4
Support of the National Brain Research Programme 0,9
1,0
Structural Funds 4,6
R&D competitiveness and excellence cooperation 8,9
CCHOP
0,0 100,0 200,0 300,0 400,0
[HUF bn]Aggregate
Mintacímdata of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
szerkesztése
Calls fostering cooperation between businesses and research centres
Structural Funds R&D competitiveness and excellence cooperation 97
295
EDIOP Higher education and Industrial Cooperation Centre – Research 5
infrastructure development 9
National competitiveness and excellence programme – 2016 26
58
Competitiveness and excellence cooperation – 2017 22
47
National Research,
12 Funded project proposals
Development and Support of the National Brain Research Programme 15 Submitted project proposals
Innovation Fund Higher education and Industrial Cooperation Centre – Research 3
infrastructure development 5
National excellence programme – 2017 2
2
Structural Funds R&D competitiveness and excellence cooperation 8
17
CCHOP
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Aggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím szerkesztése
Calls fostering infrastructure development
Excellence of strategic R&D centres 64,2
184,9
Structural Funds 40,1
EDIOP ELI-ALPS large project, Phase 2
40,1
Strengthening of the research infrastructure – internationalisation, 25,3 Total budget
networking 70,5
Awarded funding
Total funding request
Strengthening of the research infrastructure – internationalisation, 6,0
networking 18,9
Structural Funds
CCHOP 4,0
Excellence of strategic R&D centres
12,3
0,0 50,0 100,0 150,0 200,0
[HUF bn]Aggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím szerkesztése
Calls fostering infrastructure development
59
Excellence of strategic R&D centres
160
Structural Funds 1 Funded project proposals
ELI-ALPS large project, Phase 2
EDIOP 1
Submitted project proposals
Strengthening of the research infrastructure – 41
internationalisation, networking 105
Strengthening of the research infrastructure – 24
internationalisation, networking 73
Structural Funds
CCHOP 6
Excellence of strategic R&D centres
23
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Aggregate
Mintacím data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
szerkesztése
Funded project proposals by type of institution
0,0 50,0 100,0 150,0 200,0 250,0 300,0 [HUF bn] 350,0
Universities, research institutions 1895 301,4
Businesses 1981 296,6
Number of funded participations
ELI-ALPS large project, Phase 2 1 40,1
Awarded funding
NGOs 50 3,8
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Aggregate
Mintacím data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
szerkesztése
Top funded businesses
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 [HUF bn]
Richter Gedeon Nyrt. 4,2
AVL AUTÓKUT Mérnöki Kft. 3,7
Egis Gyógyszergyár Zrt. 2,0
Graboplast Padlógyártó Zrt. 1,9
Businesses
SME VARINEX Informatikai Zrt. 1,7
SME 3D HISTECH Kft. 1,7
BorsodChem Zrt. 1,6
TISZA-TK PROJEKT Kereskedelmi Kft. 1,6
SME evopro systems engineering Kft. 1,5
NNG Szoftverfejlesztő és Kereskedelmi Kft. 1,4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Number of funded participations Awarded fundingAggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacím
Top szerkesztése
funded research and knowledge-dissemination organisations
0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0[HUF bn]
ELI-HU Kutatási és Fejlesztési Nonprofit Kft. 40,1
Debreceni Egyetem 28,4
Public research insitutions
Szegedi Tudományegyetem 22,2
Pécsi Tudományegyetem 15,4
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont 12,5
Pannon Egyetem 10,9
Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem 10,6
Miskolci Egyetem 9,7
Semmelweis Egyetem 9,4
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem 8,5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 [no.] 80 90
Number of funded participations Awarded fundingAggregate data of competitive RDI calls in 2015–2017
Mintacímdistribution
Territorial szerkesztése
of awarded funding and S3 region types
Budapest 140,3
Csongrád 98,1
[HUF bn]
Knowledge regions Hajdú-Bihar 53,3
Baranya 35,6
Pest 33,9
Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén 30,8
Industrial production zones Bács-Kiskun 25,9
Fejér 21,7
Knowledge regions Veszprém 21,5 National Research, Development and
Innovation Fund
Industrial production zones Győr-Moson-Sopron 19,7
Somogy 13,3 Structural Funds – EDIOP
Low knowledge and technology
Heves 13,2
intensive regions
Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg 9,9 Structural Funds – CCHOP
Industrial production zones Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok
9,0
Low knowledge and technology
Tolna 8,0
intensive regions
Industrial production zones Komárom-Esztergom 7,9
Békés 7,5
Low knowledge and technology
Zala 7,0
intensive regions
Nógrád 5,8
Industrial production zones Vas 5,4S3-related funding schemes
Mintacím
by sectoralszerkesztése
priority (2015–2017)
100%
90% 176 (15 %) 59 (14 %)
Agricultural innovation
80% 115 (9 %) 34 (8 %)
Healthy local food
70% 76 (18 %)
241 (20 %)
60% Sustainable environment
38 (9 %)
50% 117 (10 %)
68 (16 %) Clean and renewable energies
40%
211 (18 %)
Advanced technologies in the vehicle
30%
and other machine industries
20% 147 (35 %) Healthy society and well-being
331 (28 %)
10%
0%
Bn HUF Bn HUF
Funding Request Awarded fundingFunding requests and awarded funds in S3 priority of
Mintacím
Healthy szerkesztése
society and well-being (2015–2017)
*
* Only discovery research projects in
medicine (NRDI Fund)Mintacím szerkesztése
ASSESSMENTEvaluation process of the system of competitive calls
Mintacím szerkesztése
expanded database 2 to 5 independent panel assessment,
of peer reviewers evaluations per ranking and
a database of 15,000 project proposal decision proposal
peers, including (depending on the
foreign experts type of the call)
by anonymous
a set of assessment peers
criteria open to
public
TRANSPARENT, REGULATED PROCESSThe assessment
Mintacím process of RDI calls in 2017
szerkesztése
Submission
Announcement of the call Assessment of proposals Funding decisions Contracting
deadline
03/02/
VKE 04/10 11/04-22/08 08/23 24/08-20/12
2017
14/02/ 11/05-22/08 24/08-23/11
NKP 05/10 08/23
2017
Export 03/04/ 06/08 09/06-18/10 10/19 20/10-20/12
2017
RDI 17/02/ 07/17 18/07-14/11 11/15 16/11-20/12
2017
January February March April May June July August September October November December
02/0Anonymous peer reviews commissioned by the NRDI Office
Mintacím
by szerkesztése
call in 2015–2017
5050 peer reviews
1400
1218 1244
1200
1000
800
619
600
428
400
264
208
200 154 135 153 132
51 52 45 83 59 82
30 26 27 13 27
0Mintacím
How peer szerkesztése
reviews are made? – Corporate RDIAnonymous peer reviews – Corporate RDI
Mintacím szerkesztése
Assessment criteria Value
Assessment prerequisites
Is the project objective in line with the call objective? Yes/No
a) Does the project fit in with at least one sectoral priority of the National Smart
Yes/No
Specialisation Strategy? Yes/No questions
b) Does the project involve any scientific-technological innovation or does it foresee the
Yes/No
creation of a new prototype/product/technology?
Is the budget realistic for the project activities? Yes/No
Does project implementation entail any outstandingly high risk? Yes/No
Assessment of the financial situation (based on the last closed financial year) of
0-5 points
the applicant organisation (or consortium leader in the case of a consortium)
Professional soundness of the project 0-40 points
Ratio of R&D jobs created and funding amount 0-15 points
Scores
Business potential, national/international use of the product or technology
developed with the help of the funding (in relation to the consortium leader in 0-30 points
case of a consortium)
Increase of the share of own funds in case of maximum funding intensity 0-10 points
Total: 0-100 points
Reviewer’s recommendation
Recommended/Not Recommendation
recommended
Reasoning ReasoningAnonymous peer reviews – Corporate RDI
Mintacím szerkesztése
Ranging of scores in the first round
“If the project proposal fails to meet
any of the assessment prerequisites
(yes/no questions), it will be rejected
with a score of 0.”
0-0,1 0,1-0,2 0,2-0,3 0,3-0,4 0,5-0,6 0,6-0,7 0,7-0,8 0,8-0,9 0,9-1Anonymous peer reviews – Corporate RDI
Mintacím
Ranging szerkesztése
of scores in the second round
“If the project proposal fails to meet
any of the assessment prerequisites
(yes/no questions), it will be rejected
with a score of 0.”
0-0,1 0,1-0,2 0,2-0,3 0,3-0,4 0,5-0,6 0,6-0,7 0,7-0,8 0,8-0,9 0,9-1Anonymous peer reviews – Corporate RDI
Mintacím szerkesztése
Ranging of scores in the third round
“If the project proposal fails to meet
any of the assessment prerequisites
(yes/no questions), it will be rejected
with a score of 0.”
0-0,1 0,1-0,2 0,2-0,3 0,3-0,4 0,5-0,6 0,6-0,7 0,7-0,8 0,8-0,9 0,9-1Anonymous peer reviews – Corporate RDI
Mintacím szerkesztése
Assessment criteria Value
Assessment prerequisites
Is the project objective in line with the call objective? Yes/No
a) Does the project fit in with at least one sectoral priority of the National Smart
Yes/No
Specialisation Strategy? Yes/No questions
b) Does the project involve any scientific-technological innovation or does it foresee the
Yes/No
creation of a new prototype/product/technology?
Is the budget realistic for the project activities? Yes/No
Does project implementation entail any outstandingly high risk? Yes/No
Assessment of the financial situation (based on the last closed financial year) of
0-5 points Scores
the applicant organisation (or consortium leader in the case of a consortium)
Professional soundness of the project 0-40 points
Ratio of R&D jobs created and funding amount 0-15 points
Business potential, national/international use of the product or technology
developed with the help of the funding (in relation to the consortium leader in 0-30 points
case of a consortium)
Increase of the share of own funds in case of maximum funding intensity 0-10 points
Total: 0-100 points
Rewiever’s recommendation
Recommended/Not Recommendation
recommended
Reasoning ReasoningAnonymous peer review outcomes – Corporate RDI
Mintacím szerkesztése
300
250
200
Recommended
150
for funding
Not
100 recommended
for funding
50
0
1st round 2nd round 3rd roundShare of rejective
Mintacím reviews by anonymous peers
szerkesztése
70%
66%
65%
60%
58%
55%
53%
50%
1st round 2nd round 3rd roundAnonymous peer reviews – Corporate RDI
Mintacím szerkesztése
Assessment criteria Value
Assessment prerequisites
Is the project objective in line with the call objective? Yes/No
a) Does the project fit in with at least one sectoral priority of the National Smart
Yes/No
Specialisation Strategy? Yes/No questions
b) Does the project involve any scientific-technological innovation or does it foresee the
Yes/No
creation of a new prototype/product/technology?
Is the budget realistic for the project activities? Yes/No
Does project implementation entail any outstandingly high risk? Yes/No
Assessment of the financial situation (based on the last closed financial year) of
0-5 points Scores
the applicant organisation (or consortium leader in the case of a consortium)
Professional soundness of the project 0-40 points
Ratio of R&D jobs created and funding amount 0-15 points
Business potential, national/international use of the product or technology
developed with the help of the funding (in relation to the consortium leader in 0-30 points
case of a consortium)
Increase of the share of own funds in case of maximum funding intensity 0-10 points
Total: 0-100 points
Reviewer’s recommendation
Recommended/Not Recommendation
recommended
Reasoning ReasoningDistribution
Mintacím of project proposals failed against any of the assessment
szerkesztése
prerequisites by failed question – Corporate RDI
70%
60%
50% Project objective is not in line with call objective
40% Project fails to fit in with at least one sectoral
priority of the National Smart Specialisation
Strategy
Project fails to involve any scientific-
30%
technological innovation
Budget is unrealistic
20%
Project implementation faces outstandingly high risk
10%
0%
1st round 2nd round 3rd roundDistribution of project proposals failed against any of the assessment
Mintacím szerkesztése
prerequisites by failed question in the case of non-funded proposals –
Corporate RDI
100%
90%
80% Project objective is not in line with call
objective
70%
Project fails to fit in with at least one sectoral
priority of the National Smart Specialisation
60% Strategy
Project fails to involve any scientific-
50% technological innovation
Budget is unrealistic
40%
Project implementation faces outstandingly high risk
30%
20%
10%
0%
1st round 2nd round 3rd roundAnonymous peer reviews – Corporate RDI
Mintacím szerkesztése
Assessment criteria Value
Assessment prerequisites
Is the project objective in line with the call objective? Yes/No
a) Does the project fit in with at least one sectoral priority of the National Smart
Yes/No
Specialisation Strategy? Yes/No questions
b) Does the project involve any scientific-technological innovation or does it foresee the
Yes/No
creation of a new prototype/product/technology?
Is the budget realistic for the project activities? Yes/No
Does project implementation entail any outstandingly high risk?
* Outstandingly high risks:
risky financial management data from the perspective of project
implementation
the implementation venue is not suitable for performing the activity
indicated in the project proposal Risk
own funds are secured through a loan agreement with a private individual,
including in particular a foreign private individual or foreign company, or
through member loan
there is a direct or indirect match between the seats, business premises or
owners of the applicant and the person performing the situation/market
research or the supplier
the professional competences and/or material capacities of the consortium
member or the person/supplier performing the situation/market survey
are not suitable for the implementation of the projectMintacím szerkesztése
Distribution of outstandingly high risks – Corporate RDI
risky financial management data from the
perspective of project implementation
42% the implementation venue is not suitable
45%
for performing the activity indicated in the
project proposal
14% the professional competences and/or
material capacities of the consortium
member or the person/supplier performing
the scenario/market survey are not suitable
for the implementation of the projectDistribution of the main types of risky financial management data
Mintacím szerkesztése
from the perspective of project implementation – Corporate RDI
28% provision of own funds is at risk
40%
normal course of
business is at risk
33%
provision of material
capacities is at riskProposals
Mintacímgiven “notice of deficiencies” – Corporate RDI
szerkesztése
96%
94%
92%
90%
88%
86%
84%
82%
80%
78%
76%
74%
1st round 2nd round 3rd roundMintacím szerkesztése
Most common types of deficiencies
• Unrealistic budget [1]
• Project implementation faces an outstandingly high risk
• Risky financial data from the perspective of project implementation [2]
• Provision of own funds is at risk
• Normal course of business is at risk
• Lack of competence or material capacities of the applicant or the supplier [3]
• Share of formal notice of deficiencies [4]Mintacím szerkesztése
2018
CALLS FOR PROPOSALSMintacím szerkesztése
Major changes in 2018 call for proposals
1. Targeted call for micro and small enterprises [1]
2. Introduction of own equity/own funds ratio [2]
3. Priority field for presenting the necessity and suitability of services used, and
for the justification of the procurement of assets [1],[3]
4. Submission of price quotes is mandatory – may not be submitted under a
notice of deficiency [4]
5. Applied (industrial) research – min. 2 persons with at least MSc degree as full
time employee [3]Mintacím
2018 callsszerkesztése
of the NRDI Fund I.
1. Funding to micro and small enterprises for innovation activities (2018-1.1.1-MKI)
• foreseen total budget: HUF 10 billion (indicative)
• amount of funding per project: HUF 30 to 100 million
• the call is open to legal entities with registered seat, business premises or branch office in the Central
Hungary region or the Central Hungarian branch offices of legal entities with registered seat in the
EEA, which belong to one of the company form categories specified in the call, provided that they
have at least one full completed business year, maintain double-entry accounting and are not
subject to the simplified entrepreneurial tax (EVA) or the small taxpayers’ itemized lump sum tax
(KATA).
2. Funding to SMEs and large companies for RDI activities (2018-1.1.2-KFI)
• foreseen total budget: HUF 20 billion (indicative)
• amount of funding per project: HUF 100 to 600 million
• The call is open to legal entities with registered seat, business premises or branch office in the
Central Hungary region or the Central Hungarian branch offices of legal entities with registered
seat in the EEA, individually or in a consortium of maximum 3 members, provided that they have at
least two full completed business years, maintain double-entry accounting and are not subject to
the simplified entrepreneurial tax (EVA) or the small taxpayers’ itemized lump sum tax (KATA).Main features
Mintacím of the 2018-1.1.1-MKI and 2018-
szerkesztése
1.1.2-KFI calls of the NRDI Fund
2018-1.1.1-MKI_18 2018-1.1.2-KFI_18
• micro and small enterprises • SMEs and large companies
• at least one full completed business year • at least two full completed business years
• independent entries • consortium entries
• experimental development, market entry • applied research, experimental
development, market entry
• HUF 30 to 100 million funding • HUF 100 to 600 million funding
• de minimis 100% • de minimis 50%
• procurement of assets 100% • procurement of assets – as per intensityMintacím
2018 callsszerkesztése
of the NRDI Fund II.
2. Competitiveness and excellence cooperations (2018-1.3.1-VKE)
Aims to support projects implemented in extensive collaboration between industry, academia and
research institutions, in line with industrial needs, controlled by industrial consortium leaders,
ensuring long-term sustainable cooperation
• the call is exclusively open to consortia of up to 5 members.
• consortium leaders have to be business companies; consortium partners have to be legal
entities with registered seat in Hungary or with registered seat in the European Economic
Area and a branch office in Hungary
• foreseen total budget: HUF 26 billion
• amount of funding per project: HUF 500 to 1500 million2018 callsszerkesztése
Mintacím of the NRDI Fund III.
3. National Excellence Programme (2018.1.2.1-NKP)
Available budget: HUF 5 billion, 5 sub-programmes with a budget of HUF 1 billion each
Duration: from 36 to 48 months
A. ELI Related Experimental Research National Programme
B. Artificial Intelligence in Application National Programme
C. Secure Society National Programme
D. “Clean Drinking Water” National Programme
E. Protein Science and Applications National Programme
For sub-programmes “B”, “D” and “E” the maximum amount of non-refundable funding may be
HUF 1 billion; consortia have to comprise from 3 to 5 members.
For sub-programmes “A” and “C” the maximum amount of non-refundable funding may be
HUF 300 million; consortia have to comprise up to 3 members.Plannedszerkesztése
Mintacím timing of 2018 calls
Submission
Announcement of the call Assessment of proposals Funding decisions Contracting
deadline
2018.
VKE 09/01 02/28 01/03-17/06 06/18 19/06-31/08
09/01/ 10/06-
NKP 02/28 01/03-07/06 06/08
2018 12/07
2018.
MKI 03/12 15/03-09/07 07/10 11/07-21/09
09/01
2018.
RDI 05/15 16/05-30/08 08/31 03/09-18/10
09/01
15/02-28/09
Continuous assessment 22/02-31/10 Continuous assessment
EU_KP 02/15
SME 17/04-31/10
NEMZ
19/04-21/12
January February March April May June July August September October November December
02/0Mintacím szerkesztése
NRDI FUND (2017)
ACHIEVEMENTSMintacím
Funding szerkesztése
disbursed from the National Research, Development and
90,0 HUF bn
Innovation Fund (NRDI Fund)
80,0
70,0
60,0
50,0
40,0 82,8 83,3
30,0
53,5
20,0 37,8 38,1 36,0 34,9
10,0 23,8
0,0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Mintacím szerkesztése
Beneficiary target groups of the NRDI Fund in 2017
HUF bn 40,0
2015
35,0
2016
30,0 2017
25,0
20,0
15,0
10,0
5,0
0,0
Higher education Network of HAS Businesses Other Membership fees,
research insitutions State Treasury, fund
management feesMintacím
NRDI Fund szerkesztése
disbursements as reflected in R&D spending figures
on the basis of institutions’ data sheets submitted to the
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO)
Research universities’ R&D spending
(HCSO data) and amounts disbursed from NRDI Office initiatives
the NRDI Fund to them in 2016
1. Cooperation agreement with the HCSO
HUF 5.3 bn 2. Raising awareness of the importance of
Total R&D spending by
the 6 research universities Data are summarised by filling in OSAP data sheets correctly
in 2016 according to the HCSO
R&D spending
HCSO data
3. Development of methodology proposals
Total amounts disbursed
by the NRDI Fund to the 6 Data are compared by 4. Involvement of a wider scope of data on
research universities in
2016
the HCSO
research funding
HUF 14.5 bnMintacím szerkesztése
www.nkfih.gov.huYou can also read
