Draft Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: messages for the globe, insights for the EU
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Draft Global Sustainable Development Report
2019:
messages for the globe, insights for the EU
Prof Eeva Furman, Finnish environment institute, Finland
Prof Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Prof Peter Messerli, CDE, Bern University, Swizerland
European Parliament
Public Hearing
”The remaining 12 years: EU action towards achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
7.2.2019, BrusselsTRANSFORMATIONS –
WAYS TO TACKLE ARISING PHENOMENA
AGENDA 2030 –
A VISION FOR HUMANITY
IN THE ANTHROPOCENE
KNOWLEDGE –
SCIENCE AND BEYONDGonzalo
Hernández Katherine David Amanda Jurgis
Licona Richardson Smith Glassman Staniskis
The
independent
group of Eun Mee Muhammad
Saidam
Endah
Murniningtyas
Peter Jean-Paul
Kim Messerl Moatti
scientists i
Parfait
Jean-Pascal Wolfgang Ekoundou- Eeva Ernest
van Lutz Enyegue Furman Foli
YperseleGlobal Sustainable Development Report
GSDR 2019
• Strengthen the science-policy interface to support policymakers in
promoting poverty eradication and sustainable development
• Incorporate scientific evidence in a multidisciplinary manner—natural
sciences and social sciences—considering all three dimensions of sustainable
development
• Support the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, keeping in mind its
universal and integrated nature
• Consider regional dimensions and diversity, as well as countries in special
situationsMuch good still exists and for many things
humanity has made great progress…
Paloniemi, Tiitu & Viinikka
Helsinki metropolitan
SYKE
Many countries have made their
Green infrastructure way out of extreme poverty
in European cities Rosling et al. Factfulness, 2018 5Social turning points:
poverty and inequality
World Bank. 2016. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2016: Taking on Inequality. The World Bank.Environmental turning points: climate
change and biodiversity
IPCC report on 1.5 ºC WWF Living planet report11
Systems thinking : Synergies and Trade-offs
among SDGs
Work in progress – do not
use this or refer to this!
Coding:
• 62 Global Reports and
scientific assessments
• 110 scientific papers with explicit
mention of SDG interactions
General pattern:
• 2080 interactions positively
or negatively assessed at
target level
• 85 % positive interactions
• 14 % negative interactionsSystems thinking: SDG interactions
by flows across boundaries
Yu et al.
2013
• Environmental impacts arise in • Present action is injust and
both ends of the flows , and in distorts national strategies for
different pace striving towards sustainable
developmentMeans and leavers of transformation
Means and levers of transformation
Governance
Economy and finance
Society,
behaviour,
and culture
Science & technologyGovernance and social capital as
means of transformation
• Bi-and multilateral and transboundary flow-based
governance
• Shared responsibilities: public, business, people
• National governance for effective implementation
of SDGs
• Mainstreaming in policy framework, policy coherence,
leadership
• Local action towards sustainable development
• Experimentation & local innovation -> evaluation ->
#sustainablediets
policy uptake for dispersion
• Individual capacities in enhancing sustainable
development
• Early age education for sd, links to social practices, group
behaviourEconomy as means of
transformation
@SYKE
Economy is not an aim but an effective tool
Mainstreaming sustainable development to all economic activities
SD teaching into economy studies
Circular economy, Public investments, Incentives for experimentation
Trickle-down theory is a myth (unprecdented concentration of world’s
wealth in the Top 10%)
Undisputable evidence (IMF, OECD, WB, World Inequality report)
that reducing intra-country inequality is not simply a question of
fairness but a prerequisite :
- For long-term eradication of poverty
- For sustainable economic growthBusiness & financing:
means for transformation
FINANCING FOR TRANSFORMATION
➢ ODA can at the most have a leverage effect
➢ There is a massive need for reallocation of both public and private
investment (sustainable inclusive finance).
Estimated yearly investment need for SDGs implementation (UNDP) = 2500 billions US $
BUSINESS FOR TRANSFORMATION
➢ Business ecosystems taking ownership of sustainable development
➢ Business models : sharing economy, circular economy, longevity
➢ New concepts of work: social innovations and green jobsScience & technology: implementation
of SDGs requires sustainability science
SYSTEMS APPROACH, MEANS FOR
ANALYSING:
• complex causal chains
• interactions between SDGs
• path dependencies and alternative
futures
LEARNING THROUGH RISKS:
• experimenting and analysing
experiments
CO-CREATION: Riots in Womey (16/09/2014) – Ebola and
Guinea forest
• integrating stakeholders in the entire
lifespan of researchScience & technology:
need for contextualised and balanced
perspectives on transformation
to sustainable development
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, June 2018. 7,8 million researchers in 2013GSDR’s structure
Areas of critical importance needing transformative change
to achieve social and environmental fairness
Food Energy & De- Land and Cities Health and …
Means and levers of transformation
system carbonization Water Education
s
Governance
Economy and finance
Society,
behaviour,
and culture
Science & technology
Diverse Pathways to transformation interweaving different means
and levers according to geographic context and level of scalePathways towards sustainable
development: example on food systems
Example levers for pathways on food systems:
GOVERNANCE TRANSITION TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION BEHAVIOURAL TRANSITION
• Greater transparency within • Increased use of digital • Enabling distributors and
food supply chains through farming systems and consumers to reduce
improved certification improved access to food waste
processes and labels for information
sustainable food productionEU from the GSDR2019 view The most serious sustainability deficit for European welfare is its ecological debt, - caused by consumption and production patterns – impacts being externalised to other parts of the world
EU from the GSDR2019 view EU to showcase ambitious vision and concretism of SDG implementation for other parts of the world: the UN • Institutional coherence and buy in • Policy coherence and buy in • Countries´coherence and buy in
EU forerunner in emissions trading
systems (ETS)
Sufficient prce signal and policy coherence essentialEuropean energy policy impacts in global context
Renewable energy technology (RET) in focus
• EU-supported RETs
• Complex but balanced effects on SDGs
• Benefit on climate-related SDGs
• Negative impacts on SDG15 Life on
Land
• Complex spillover effects must be
assessed
www.EKLIPSE-mechanism.euRisk management across the UN SDGs
-
co-creation between science, policy, finance, insurance and industry
”Most risk management choices have costs that will appear as countering other
goals: dealing with risks is about addressing trade-offs.” said Anders Branth
Pedersen from PEER partner DCE Aarhus University. This is where the sustainable
development paradigm comes in handy. It requires that risks are not considered in
isolation.
(www.peer.eu)WHAT AFTER HORIZON 2020? DRAFT BUDGET OF 100B€ (+33B€)
N|
PATHWAYS &
TRANSFORMATIONS BY
INTERLINKING SDGs
CO-CREATED
GLOBAL
GOVERNANCE
OF FLOWS
SUSTAINABILITY
SCIENCE IN ALL
CONTINENTSThank you!
You can also read