APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 - NEW ZEALAND - New paths ahead for international tax Controversy - DLA Piper

Page created by Walter Christensen
 
CONTINUE READING
APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 - NEW ZEALAND - New paths ahead for international tax Controversy - DLA Piper
APA & MAP COUNTRY
GUIDE 2018 – NEW ZEALAND
New paths ahead for international tax
Controversy
APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 - NEW ZEALAND - New paths ahead for international tax Controversy - DLA Piper
NEW ZEALAND

                                  APA PROGRAM

 KEY FEATURES
 Competent             Inland Revenue Department (‘IRD’)
 authority

 Relevant              Part 5A of the Tax Administration Act; and general guidance
 provisions            available on the IRD’s website.

 Types of APAs         Unilateral, bilateral, and multilateral APAs are available under the
 available             private binding rulings regime.

 Acceptance            No specific guidance.
 criteria
 Key timing            No specific guidance.
 requests,
 deadlines

 APA term limits       There is no specific guidance for APA term limits. In practice
                       there is usually a maximum term of five years.
 Filing fee            A flat fee of NZD 322 (approx. USD 226) is payable to the IRD.
                       Any overseas travel is required for the completion of an APA, and
                       the IRD will seek to recover out of pocket expenses on an actual and
                       reasonable basis from the Taxpayer. An estimate of such costs will be
                       provided to the Taxpayer prior to the travel being undertaken.
 Rollback              No specific guidance.
 availability
 Collateral issues     Applications from Taxpayers under investigation by the IRD for
                       tax issues will be refused.
 PRE-FILING REQUIREMENTS
 Overview              Taxpayers intending to apply for an APA should contact for a pre-
                       application meeting with a Principal Advisor (Transfer Pricing) to
                       discuss the proposal informally. During the meeting the following
                       will be discussed and presented for consideration:
                       ■■ an overview of the business operations;

                       ■■ background information on the foreign entities involved in the
                          transactions intended to be covered by the APA; and
                       ■■ TP method intended to be applied.

 Anonymous pre-        Anonymous pre-filing is not available.
 filing availability
02 | APA & MAP Country Guide 2018 – New Zealand
APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 - NEW ZEALAND - New paths ahead for international tax Controversy - DLA Piper
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d)

APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Content of          After a successful pre-filing meeting the APA application will
application         be formalised and submitted for consideration. This application
                    should include:
                    ■■   identification of the test party;
                    ■■   analysis of key profit drivers and value added;
                    ■■   a full functional analysis;
                    ■■   the choice of TP method;
                    ■■   a study of comparables;
                    ■■   proposed application of methodology and comparables; and
                    ■■   copies of all inter-company agreements.
                    Site visits and interviews may be required during the application
                    review stage to inspect the actual operations of the relevant
                    associated parties, especially where valuable intangibles are in
                    issue and a residual profit split methodology is proposed.
Language            The documentation should be submitted in English.
SME provisions      No specific guidance.
OTHER PROCEDURAL CONSIDERATIONS
General             The IRD follows a standard pre-filing, application and monitoring
                    process. There are no unique procedural aspects.
Monitoring &        Taxpayers are required to provide an Annual Compliance Report
compliance          at the time of filing their annual returns and indicate whether or
                    not they have adhered to the terms of the APA.
Renewal             Taxpayers may request to renew an existing APA following the
procedure           same process as it did to initiate the existing APA.

                                                                      www.dlapiper.com | 03
APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 - NEW ZEALAND - New paths ahead for international tax Controversy - DLA Piper
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d)

                                  MAP PROGRAM

 KEY FEATURES
 Competent             Inland Revenue Department (‘IRD’)
 authority
 Relevant              There are no specific provisions for the MAP procedure in
 provisions            domestic law. Taxpayers must rely on the MAP provisions under
                       DTTs, and informal guidance published on the IRD website.
 Acceptance            Taxpayers may request a MAP if taxation has or is likely to occur
 criteria              that is not in accordance with the provisions of a DTT to which
                       New Zealand is signatory.
 Key timing            Most of New Zealand’s DTTs permit Taxpayers to present a case
 requests,             to the IRD within three years from the first notification to the
 deadlines             Taxpayer of the actions giving rise to taxation not in accordance
                       with the DTT. However, time limits may vary, and the relevant
                       DTT should be consulted for the applicable time limit.

04 | APA & MAP Country Guide 2018 – New Zealand
APA & MAP COUNTRY GUIDE 2018 - NEW ZEALAND - New paths ahead for international tax Controversy - DLA Piper
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d)

APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Content of         Taxpayers can facilitate the MAP by ensuring the tax authorities
application        of both contracting states receive complete, accurate and timely
                   information. Depending on what may be determined as a result
                   of a pre-filing conference, the following information should be
                   included in a taxpayer’s MAP submission:
                   ■■   name, address and IRD number of the Taxpayer;
                   ■■   the provision of the specific article of the DTT which the
                        taxpayer considers is not being applied correctly by either one
                        or both contracting states;
                   ■■   the relevant facts of the case including any documentation
                        substantiating these facts, the period involved and the amounts
                        involved;
                   ■■   an analysis of the issues involved supported by relevant
                        documentation;
                   ■■   where a request has also been made to the tax authority of the
                        other contracting state, a copy of that submission;
                   ■■   if the issue has been previously dealt with by some other
                        means (such as an advance ruling, APA or settlement
                        agreement), then a copy of any relevant ruling or agreement;
                   ■■   if the MAP request has been submitted to another tax
                        authority under another instrument that provides for a
                        mechanism to resolve treaty-related disputes, then a copy of
                        that submission (including all related documentation) unless
                        the content of both MAP submissions are exactly the same;
                   ■■   if the MAP request is “protective” (ie submitted to ensure
                        compliance with a time frame provided under the relevant
                        DTT but not to be examined until further notification from the
                        taxpayer to do so), then a clear statement to this effect; and
                   ■■   a final statement confirming that all information provided in
                        the MAP request is accurate and additional information will be
                        provided in a timely manner if required by the tax authority.

                                                                    www.dlapiper.com | 05
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d)

 OTHER PROCEDURAL CONSIDERATIONS
 Interaction           Taxpayers can initiate the MAP and the domestic disputes process
 with domestic         simultaneously. Access to MAP is not limited with respect to
 proceedings           matters resolved through the Disputes Review Unit. Requesting
                       assistance to resolve a dispute under the MAP does not preclude
                       any domestic action. A request for assistance under the MAP can
                       be made even if an audit settlement has been agreed domestically.
                       Furthermore, the IRD is legally bound to follow a domestic
                       court decision in MAP cases, but is willing to enter into dialogue
                       with other relevant foreign jurisdiction’s competent authorities
                       to explain the New Zealand position in any case where double
                       taxation may have arisen as a consequence.
 Arbitration           No specific guidance.
 STATISTICS
 APA                   As at 30 June 2017, 170 APAs had been completed by the IRD.
 MAP                   New Zealand had a total of 15 active MAP applications as of
                       31 December 2016. The average time needed to close MAP
                       cases is 22 months for transfer pricing cases, and 19 months for
                       other cases.

06 | APA & MAP Country Guide 2018 – New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND (cont’d)

DOUBLE TAXATION TREATY NETWORK

The following treaties include MAP provisions which are the basis for bilateral and
multilateral APA negotiations:

Australia(I)                            India                               Samoa(IV)
Austria                                 Indonesia                           Singapore
Belgium                                 Ireland                             South Africa
British Virgin Islands     (IV)
                                        Italy                               Spain
Canada(IV)                              Japan(I), (IV), (VI)                Sweden
Chile                                   Korea (Republic of)                 Switzerland
China                                   Malaysia                            Taipei(III)
Czech Republic                          Mexico                              Thailand
Denmark                                 Netherlands                         Turkey
Fiji                                    Norway                              United Arab Emirates
Finland                                 Papua New Guinea       (IV)
                                                                            United Kingdom
France                                  Philippines                         United States
Germany                                 Poland                              Vietnam(IV)
Hong Kong                               Russia

NOTES
I      denotes treaties with MAP arbitration provisions.
II     denotes treaties with the USSR that remain applicable until a separate tax treaty is concluded.
III	denotes treaties between the countries’ representative office in Taipei and the Taipei Economic and
     Cultural Office in the relevant country.
IV     denotes treaties that became effective within the last five years.
V      denotes treaties that are awaiting ratification.
VI	denotes MAP provisions identical to para 3, art 25 of the OECD Model Convention with respect to
    Taxes on Income and on Capital.
VII arbitration is to be conducted under the statutes of the ECJ.
VIII arbitration is to be conducted under the statutes of the ICJ.

                                                                                          www.dlapiper.com | 07
DLA PIPER CONTACTS
               Joel Cooper                        Randall Fox
               Partner, Co-Head International     Partner, Co-Head of
               Transfer Pricing                   International Transfer Pricing
               T +44 207 796 6929                 T +44 207 796 6928
               M +44 773 829 5470                 M +44 773 8295 935
               joel.cooper@dlapiper.com           randall.fox@dlapiper.com

NEW ZEALAND

               Lynette Smith
               Special Counsel
               T +64 9 300 3812
               lynette.smith@dlapiper.co.nz

08 | APA & MAP Country Guide 2018 – New Zealand
www.dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm operating through various separate and distinct legal entities
Further details of these entities can be found at www.dlapiper.com.

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with, and does not
create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for
taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper will accept no responsibility for any actions taken
or not taken on the basis of this publication. This may qualify as “Lawyer Advertising” requiring notice in
some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Copyright © 2018 DLA Piper. All rights reserved. | AUG18 | 3318123
You can also read