Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers

Page created by Andre Schroeder
 
CONTINUE READING
Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
Brexit and the welfare of
animals used in farming
                 Paula Sparks
    Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law
     Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
Status quo
• Most UK legislation on farm animal welfare derived from EU law
• EU law shapes and is shaped by the UK
• EU directives lay down minimum standards for farm animal
  husbandry – specific provisions for pigs, calves, broiler chickens and
  laying hens (in species-specific directives)
• EU regulations on welfare during transport and slaughter
Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
Brexit – Article 50
• From triggering of Article 50 States have two years in which to
  negotiate and conclude an agreement “setting out the arrangements
  for its withdrawal”
• EU Treaties cease to apply to the State after 2 years unless time
  period extended
• UK will be excluded from key EU institutions, technical committees…
• UK originated laws will stay, e.g. Animal Welfare Act
Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
Where are we now…?
• Negotiations with EU started on 19 June 2017
• UK must conclude negotiations by 29 March 2019
• Bearing in mind ratification procedure, UK really has until end of 2018
• Withdrawal Bill transposes across EU laws which will be scrutinised in
  due course
• Transitional Agreement to be agreed before Brexit date (March 2019)
Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
‘Brexit: getting the best deal for animals’
• Over 40 signatories from
  animal groups
• Sector analysis, including
  farming
• Key welfare
  recommendations
Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
Animals in agriculture
• Animals in agriculture
• Section 4
• http://www.alaw.org.uk/wp-
  content/uploads/Brexit-Getting-
  the-Best-Deal-for-Animals-Full-
  Report.pdf
Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
Report identifies key areas for reform
Brexit and the welfare of animals used in farming - Paula Sparks Chairperson, UK Centre for Animal Law Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers
Trade recommendations
• EU rules now prevent import prohibitions on products produced to
  lower animal welfare standards
• New trade deals should contain a clause permitting a requirement
  that imports standards meet UK animal welfare and health standards
  or are otherwise subject to a tariff.
• Domestic and imported goods labelled as to method of production
• Ban on import of foie gras
• Ban on live exports of animals for slaughter
Recommendations for CAP replacement
• New farm support payments that reward better animal welfare and
  environment standards
• Additional payments for achieving higher welfare standards than
  baseline, e.g. bringing pigs to slaughter without tail docking.
• Farm support payments to encourage (for example) move to free
  farrowing systems for sows and from fast growing broiler chicken
  genotypes.
Species specific and other recommendations
• Extending the definition of ‘animal’ in animal protection law
  to decapod crustaceans and cephalopods
• Dairy cows: phasing out zero grazing
• Broiler chickens: increasing maximum permitted stocking
  density and shifting from fast growing bird genotypes
• Lying hens: ban on use of enriched cages
Cont….
• Pigs: replacing farrowing crates with free systems
• Detailed species specific regulations for dairy cows, beef cattle,
  sheep, ducks, turkeys, farmed fish, cephalopods.
• Ban on preventative use of antibiotics
• Mandatory use of CCTV in slaughterhouses
• Slaughter - phasing out high concentrations of carbon dioxide to kill
  pigs; ban shackling chickens for water bath stunning. Mandatory
  stunning before slaughter.
Government proposals
Command paper CM 9577
• Pre-cursor to the Agriculture Bill
• ‘This paper consults on a new, post-CAP domestic settlement for
  agriculture’
                                             The Rt. Hon Michael Gove MP
Aspirations
• ‘We will incentivise methods of farming that create new
  habitats for wildlife, increase biodiversity, reduce flood risk,
  better mitigate climate change and improve air quality by
  reducing agricultural emissions. We will achieve this by
  ensuring that public money is spent on public goods…’
  (para 6)
Animal welfare as a priority area
• ‘While environmental enhancement and protection are of
  key importance, better animal and plant health, animal
  welfare, improved public access, rural resilience and
  productivity are also areas where government could play a
  role in supporting farmers and land managers in the
  future…’ (para 14)
Cont….
• …we could pilot schemes that offer targeted payments to
  farmers who deliver higher welfare outcomes in sectors
  where animal welfare largely remains at the legislative
  minimum…’
‘Fulfilling our responsibility to animals’
• LIVE EXPORTS ‘..we also propose to take early steps to control the
  export of live animals for slaughter as we leave the EU.’
• PUBLIC GOOD PAYMENTS ‘Animal welfare is one of the public goods
  we could support in the future…Payments could also be made to
  farmers who trial a new approach or technology which could improve
  welfare outcomes..’
• LABELLING ‘We are considering whether providing greater clarity of
  information to consumers could support higher welfare production.’
Live exports
Public pressure for a ban on live exports
• Public petition to end live exports of animals for slaughter reached
  96,307 signatures
• Significant public concern about animal welfare conditions during
  transport
• Proposals for a ban on animals transported for slaughter, rather than
  breeding
• Debated in Parliament on 26 February 2018
Government response
• ‘Once we leave the European Union, and in line with our manifesto
  commitment, we can take early steps to control the export of live
  farm animals for slaughter. We will be considering the options further
  in the context of our departure from the EU.

• We have made clear in Brussels that we support improvements being
  made to enforcement across the EU of existing rules on the long
  distance transport of livestock. We have also supported calls for the
  European Commission to make improvements to the existing EU
  Regulation on protecting animal welfare in transport.’
Border checks
• Heightened concern about animal welfare during transit post Brexit in
  the event of ‘no deal’ on Customs arrangements
• Border checks have the potential to lead to delays, EU infrastructure
  ill-equipped to cope?
• Risk of animals waiting for hours or days in very poor conditions.
Mandatory CCTV in slaughterhouses
Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament
Key provisions
• CCTV must be installed and provide ‘a complete and clear image of
  killing and related operations in all areas of the slaughterhouse where
  live animals are present.’
• applies to all approved slaughterhouses
• applies from 4 May 2018
• 90 day retention period for footage
• unfettered access to CCTV recordings for monitoring, verification and
  enforcement by those who require it for these purposes
Direct benefits for animal welfare
• Consultation response (2017) identified:
• ‘One industry body noted that welfare outcome data might
  be able to be logged by data-capture CCTV recording, e.g.
  intact tails on pigs and lameness in all species, to enhance
  supply chain efficiency.’
Indirect benefits for animal welfare
• Consultation response:
Sentience and sentencing
Sentience and Article 13
• Article 13,                     • ‘In formulating and implementing the
  treaty on the functioning of the Union’s agriculture, fisheries, transport,
  European union (TFEU)             internal market, research and
                                    technological development and space
                                    policies, the Union and the Member
                                    States shall, since animals are sentient
                                    beings, pay full regard to the welfare
                                    requirements of animals, while
                                    respecting the legislative or
                                    administrative provisions and customs
                                    of the Member States relating in
                                    particular to religious rites, cultural
                                    traditions and regional heritage.’
Significance of Article 13
• Art. 13 recognises that animals deserve special protection by reason
  of their sentience;
• It places a legal obligation upon the EU and Member States to pay full
  regard to animals’ welfare requirements when formulating and
  implementing policy.
• UK will no longer be bound by At 13 after leaving EU; not transposed
  by Withdrawal Bill
Draft Bill introduced
• Proposed a duty upon Ministers
  to have regard to animal welfare
  when formulating and
  implementing policy
• Sentencing proposals to increase
  maximum sentences for cruelty
  offences to five years
  imprisonment.
Select Committee report
• Support for increased maximum
  sentences
• Support for concepts around
  sentience
• Recommendation for better
  definitions of key provisions and
  clarification around
  accountability mechanisms.
Enforcement mechanisms post Brexit
• Proposed new environmental body for environmental standards
• What will be introduced for animal welfare?
• Linked to new farm support payments regime – setting and enforcing
  standards?
• NGO’s call for Prospective Animal Welfare Impact Assessments?
• Other political mechanisms of accountability?
Where from here?
• Difficult to predict………
• Dependent upon the model of relation with the EU
• The nature of trade and customs agreements likely to be key
• Free Trade Agreements outside the EU – the willingness and ability of
  UK to negotiate pro animal welfare terms; real risk of a ‘race to the
  bottom’ regarding animal welfare standards.
Thanks for listening

      Paula Sparks
 UK Centre for Animal Law

 paula.sparks@alaw.org.uk
You can also read