Foothills Chiller Plant March 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Foothills Chiller Plant
March 2021Table of contents
1. Executive summary ………………………………………………………………………………………..3
2. Justification…………………………………………………………………………………………………….3
2.1 Utility Services Recommendation
2.2 Physical Condition/Functionality of Space
2.3 Total new space requirements
2.4 Equipment list
2.5 Alternative analysis
2.6 Benefits of project
3. Design criteria……………………………………………………………………………….…………....4
3.1 Site Constraints
3.2 Flood Mitigation analysis
3.3 LEED Goal
3.4 Architectural and Mechanical Narrative
3.5 CSU Standards
3.6 CSU Inclusivity Standards
3.7 List of applicable codes
4. Project Schedule, cost estimates, financing………………………………….….…………8
4.1 Project schedule and phasing
4.2 Financing
4.3 Cost estimate with description of methodology employed
Appendices
a. Utility map
b. Site map
c. Floor plans
d. Elevations
e. Foothills Campus Flood Plain
f. Budget Estimate
2Executive Summary
The project will construct an approximately 3500 gsf central chilled water plant to replace dispersed chillers
at the Infectious Disease Research Center (IDRC) on Foothills Campus. There are currently twelve distributed
chillers serving the IDRC complex and ARBL. Due to the nature of the research, all of this equipment is fully
redundant (i.e. twice the number of chillers are installed than are needed for cooling). Much of this equipment
is at end of life and the remainder will be so within ten years. With the construction of the new CVID building,
the University had a choice to install more distributed equipment or transition to a central chilled water plant.
Life cycle cost analysis showed that the most cost-effective solution was to make the transition to a central
plant.
The estimated budget is $6.4M. The project will be financed with funds from the CVID project (in lieu of a
chiller/cooling tower for the building), and a loan to be paid back over a period of 5 years from energy
savings and annual VPUO maintenance funding.
The project is designed and estimated to take 12 months to complete. CSU anticipates a multi-prime
delivery method, with multiple bid packages.
Justification
Utility Services
Utility Services recommends abandoning the distributed equipment paradigm for cooling at IDRC. Heating at
the IDRC site already follows the central model with excellent results. Distributed equipment with life left in
it can be sold to recoup some cost. Finally, retirement of the distributed inventory will allow existing Facilities
personnel to maintain the central plant with no change in staffing.
Physical Condition/functionality of Existing Space
There are currently twelve distributed chillers serving the IDRC complex and ARBL. Due to the nature of the
research, all of this equipment is fully redundant (i.e. twice the number of chillers are installed than are
needed for cooling). The newest air-cooled equipment at IDRC is nearly halfway through its lifespan and in
ten years all of it will need replacement. Estimates are that $950K in CM funds will be necessary to replace
the four oldest air-cooled chillers, one of which is currently at reduced capacity due to component failure.
New Space Requirements
Room type Number Total GSF
Chiller Plant 1 3480
Alternative analysis
While the first-cost is greater for a central plant than for replacement of the existing distributed chiller
inventory, the cost of ownership is dramatically smaller. The following graph illustrates order of magnitude
comparisons for 50-year ownership cost.
350-YEAR LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS
UPDAT E D O C TO BE R 2 0 1 9
Equipment First Cost Replacement Cost Maintenance Cost Utility Cost
$100,000,000
$88,800,000
$90,000,000
$80,000,000 $20,600,000
$70,000,000
$60,800,000
$10,600,000
$60,000,000
$50,000,000 $17,400,000
$40,000,000 $8,400,000
$30,000,000 $52,600,000
$20,000,000 $28,600,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000 $6,400,000
$0
BASE CASE DISTRIBUTED CHILLERS CENTRAL CHILLED WATER PLANT
The difference in ownership cost is primarily due to the significant reduction of installed equipment through
centralized redundancy and a diversity of peak loads. Central equipment is of higher quality and has a longer
useful life. Controlled Maintenance (replacements) over 50 years will be roughly half with a central plant.
Centralized equipment requires more maintenance than distributed equipment on a unit by unit basis,
however, the central plant has roughly a third of the installed equipment, and thus maintenance dollars are
roughly 20% less. There is a reduction in annual energy use (estimated at $25k in today’s dollars) due to higher
efficiencies and less equipment.
Benefits of the Project
In addition to the life cycle cost savings there are intangible benefits as well. Air-cooled chillers are noisy and
central plants are quiet. There are neighbors very close to the south of IDRC, with an established history of
complaints, including a current complaint being addressed from the Bella Vira development southeast of the
IDRC complex. A central plant is more robust better able to respond to growth and load variation. It is simpler
and cheaper to modify the central plant than it is distributed equipment. In many cases, growth can be
absorbed into the existing central plant capacity due to inherent diversity. Finally, a central plant consolidates
the cooling footprint, freeing space for other use and avoiding equipment sprawl. One desire at IDRC, for
example, is to consolidate deliveries to the back side of RBL. Removal of chillers will enable that effort.
Design Criteria
Site Constraints
The chiller plant will be outside the secured area of the Judd Harper Complex, to the NW of the cGMP
building.
4Flood Mitigation Analysis
Not applicable to anticipated building site. See flood plain map in appendix.
LEED Goal
The project is waived due to the size of the project and specialized program. The following Sustainable
Design Strategies have been considered.
Sustainability measures employed in this project will directly affect all buildings connected to it on the
Foothills Campus. The replacement of aging air-cooled chillers with connections to a central chilled water
system has the potential to reduce energy use for each building on the campus. This approach can also
increase the resilience of the campus by including redundant chilled water generation, limiting the
negative effects of maintenance downtime and equipment failure.
Any future new construction or renovations of buildings on the campus seeking LEED certification (such
as the CVID building) can benefit from certain measures taken, including the use of high efficiency
chillers, low environmental impact refrigerant, cooling tower makeup water treatment, and ice thermal
storage. Increasing the number of points available to a project by connecting to the chilled water plant
can give project teams more flexibility in meeting LEED goals. Relevant LEED v4.0/v4.1 credits include:
• Water Efficiency Credit 3: Cooling Tower and Process Water Use (LEED v4.1)
• Energy and Atmosphere Credit 2: Optimize Energy Use (LEED v4.0/v4.1)
• Energy and Atmosphere Credit 4: Grid Harmonization (LEED v4.1)
• Energy and Atmosphere Credit 7: Enhanced Refrigerant Management (LEED v4.0/v4.1)
Cooling Tower and Process Water Use (LEED v4.1)
Under LEED v4.1, projects are allowed to take credit for cooling towers associated with district energy
systems. To earn one point, a potable water test must be conducted to measure concentrations of
5CaCO3, total alkalinity, SiO2, Cl-, and conductivity, then the maximum number of cycles achieved without
exceeding these concentrations is calculated to document compliance for one point. One additional point
can be achieved by increasing the maximum number of cycles by 25% through water treatment/
maintenance or using a minimum of 20% nonpotable water for cooling tower makeup.
Optimize Energy Use (LEED v4.0/v4.1)
Projects may take into account the performance of connected district energy systems in the energy
model. High efficiency chillers, cooling towers, and pumps can increase the calculated energy savings
and contribute to the number of points a project can earn under this credit.
Grid Harmonization (LEED v4.1)
The use of thermal ice storage may qualify projects for points under Case 3: Load Flexibility and
Management Strategies by satisfying the requirements of Peak Load Optimization (reduce on-peak load
by at least 10% compared to peak electrical demand) and/or Flexible Operating Scenarios (move at least
10% of peak load by a time period of 2 hours). As this credit is new under LEED 4.1, further research is
needed to determine if projects can take credit for strategies used in a district energy system.
Enhanced Refrigeration Management (LEED v4.0/v4.1)
Projects must take into account any refrigerants used in connected district energy systems to earn the
point for this credit, so using low-impact refrigerants in the chillers contributes.
Utility Incentive Programs
This project is included in Xcel’s Energy Efficient Buildings (EEB) rebate program along with the CVID
building. Nexant is the third-party rebate program administrator assigned to this project.
Architectural
The building will be a premanufactured metal building. Panel colors will be chosen by Facilities
Management based on standard manufacturer options.
6Mechanical Narrative
The plant will initially provide chilled water for the new CSU Center for Vector-Borne and Infectious Disease
(CVID) only and will be sized to provide chilled water to six existing buildings on the Foothills Campus. The
project design will consist of a 3,480 square foot facility centrally located on the Foothills Campus. The
facility will house two 600-ton chillers with one 150-ton pony chiller and associated cooling towers, pumps,
and equipment as well the required electrical, fire protection, and other support systems. Through a phased
approach, the plant will eventually replace a total of 12 associated existing air-cooled chillers that need
major repairs and/or replacement. There will also be underground chilled water piping installed running from
the new plant to the CVID and stub-outs to serve as attachment points for piping serving the existing
buildings mentioned below.
• Research Innovation Center (RIC)
• Regional Biocontainment Lab (RBL)
• CGMP Pharmaceutical Mfg. (CGMP)
• Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Lab (ARBL)
• Bio-Environmental Hazards Research Building (BRB)
Building Building Building Floor Required Cooling Required Chilled Required Pipe Connection
Name Number Area (sf) Capacity (tons) Water Flow (gpm) Diameter (in) Priority
CVID 32454 217 342 6 1
BHRB 1424 19447 104 164 4 2
RBL 1426 43941 460 724 8 3
CGMP 1429 0 4
RIC 1428 69755 280 441 6 4
ARBL 1402 34587 215 339 6 5
CSU Standards
The CSU Building Construction Standards Manual is available at:
http://www.fm.colostate.edu/constr_standards
The CSU Standards are to be used as guidelines for design. They are divided into 3 parts for use by
Architects and Engineers: the first part is administrative; the second part discusses requirements for design
and deliverables at each stage of the design process; the third part consists of the technical standards
arranged by CSI division. The Standards are a work in progress, and as such, any question about the
applicability of a standard should be discussed with the project manager. The Standards should never be
referenced or copied in Contract Documents – the design is expected to embody and conform to the
Standards. Contractors are not to be directed to review the Standards as a contract requirement.
CSU INCLUSIVITY STANDARDS-not applicable to this project
LIST OF APPLICABLE CODES
Approved building codes and standards have been adopted by the Office of the State Architect (herein
referred to as State Buildings Program (SBP)) and other state authorities, and are identified below as the
minimum requirements to be applied to all construction projects at state agencies and institutions of
higher education owned facilities.
7Applicable codes:
2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE
2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE
2018 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE
2010 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN
2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1
Project schedule, cost estimates and financing
Schedule/phasing
The project is designed and estimated to take 12 months to complete. CSU anticipates a multi-prime
delivery method, with multiple bid packages.
Financing
The estimated budget is $6.4M. The project will be financed with funds from the CVID project (in lieu of a
chiller/cooling tower for the building), and a loan to be paid back over a period of 5 years from energy
savings and annual VPUO maintenance funding.
Cost estimate/methodology
Cost estimates were developed by Facilities Management staff. CSU standards specify that the A/E
document 20% of the construction budget in bid alternates, to cover potential volatility in the construction
market as the project progresses.
Appendices
a. Utility map
b. Site map
c. Floor plans
d. Elevations
e. Foothills Campus Flood Plain
f. Budget Estimate
8BIO
1419 MASS
BIOMASS 1403
SOLAR PANELS OPERATIONS
TRAILER
N
cGMP Pharm.
1436 MFG. BLDG
1429
1435
R.I.C. BLDG
1428 REGIONAL
C
BIOCONTAINMENT
L O
S E
/
F OF
C
S
L O
E
F/ OF
C
O
L
S
E
/
O F
F
LABORATORY
1426
1425
SARA
1430
AIDL
1421
1305
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
1424
FOOTHILLS CAMPUS
1423
JUDD HARPER COMPLEX
IDA 1432
1422
1433
NO DIG ZONE
RADIATION ANIMAL CONTAINER
CALL RADIATION CONTROL - EHS 0 50 100 200
Scale: 1"=100'NORTH
1410
1409
DRIVE
EXISTING
BSA LifeStructures
999 18th Street, N1625
Denver, CO 80202
NEW GRAVEL DRIVE;
ph 303.256.3300 fx 317.819.7288
ADD ALTERNATE - ASPHALT, RE: CIVIL
EXISTING ELECTRICAL SWITCH WITH
EXISTING BOLLARDS, RE: ELEC
PARKING AREA FOR MOBILE T
BACKUP GENERATOR, RE: ELEC
NEW TRANSFORMER WITH NEW 12"
BOLLARDS TO MATCH EXISTING, RE: ELEC
ALIGN WITH EXISTING SWITCH
CSU DCFC
T
20'-1" MOBILE TRAILER T
FIRE SEPARA
TION
1419 DISTRICT COOLING FOR
BIO-MASS
THE FOOTHILLS CAMPUS
PLANT
1403 CLIENT PROJECT NO. - 191024A
BID PACK 01 - CIVIL SITE
PACKAGE
NEW
CHILLED
WATER MARK
0
DATE
06-23-2020
DESCRIPTION
FOR INFORMATION ONLY (NIC)
PLANT
73'-0 1/2"
NEW ASPHALT, RE: CIVIL
EXISTING CONCRETE
GRAVEL, RE: CIVIL TO REMAIN
COOLING TOWERS, RE: MECH
NEW GRAVEL DRIVE;
ADD ALTERNATE - CONCRETE SIDEWALK
ASPHALT, RE: CIVIL
FUTURE EXPANSION
OAD
FUTURE R
ROAD
EXISTING
NEW FENCE, RE: CIVIL
PROPOSED CHILLED WATER
C:\Users\BMcMullen\Documents\20920002-ARCH_BSALS_CENTRAL_v2019_bmcmullen5E89A.rvt
LINES, RE: CIVIL
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN - ENLARGED
1
1/16" = 1'-0"
0' 8' 16' 32'
DATE JUNE 23, 2020
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
BSALS PROJECT NO. 20920002
A1.11
6/24/2020 9:13:21 AM
APPROVED Approver
Designer
Author
© BSA LifeStructures Inc.
DESIGNED
DRAWNPLAN NORTH
OPENING SCHEDULE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS LEGEND
OPENING SIZE OPENING CONSTRUCTION FRAME CONSTRUCTION
GLASS TYPE
XX
DETAIL SET
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
NEW COLUMN LINE
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
RATING INACTIVE SIM
OPENING # ROOM NAME (MINS.) HEIGHT WIDTH LEAF WIDTH REMARKS 1 SECTION INDICATOR
A101
100.1 MECHANICAL ROOM 7' - 0" 4' - 0" 0' - 0" HM A1.2 HM PANIC HARDWARE, CLOSER, THRESHOLD, WEATHERSTRIPPING
100.2 MECHANICAL ROOM 11' - 0" 8' - 0" STEEL INSULATED ROLL UP SERVICE DOOR AREA
100.3 MECHANICAL ROOM 11' - 0" 8' - 0" STEEL INSULATED ROLL UP SERVICE DOOR DETAIL INDICATOR
OF
100.4 MECHANICAL ROOM 11' - 0" 8' - 0" STEEL INSULATED ROLL UP SERVICE DOOR DETAIL DETAIL NUMBER
100.5 MECHANICAL ROOM 7' - 0" 4' - 0" 0' - 0" HM A1.2 HM PANIC HARDWARE, CLOSER, THRESHOLD, WEATHERSTRIPPING 1 SIM SIMILAR
100.6 MECHANICAL ROOM 7' - 0" 4' - 0" 0' - 0" HM A1.2 HM PANIC HARDWARE, CLOSER, THRESHOLD, WEATHERSTRIPPING A101 SHEET NUMBER
ROOM ROOM NAME DESIGNATION
000 ROOM NUMBER DESIGNATION
PLAN NOTE DESIGNATION
D C B A 00
000 EQUIPMENT DESIGNATION.
92'-0" REFER
TO EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE.
31'-0" 30'-0" 31'-0" FLOOR DRAIN
1
4 A000 2 ELEVATION TAG
37'-6"
3
00 TOILET ACCESSORY
FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER -
BRACKET MOUNTED
15'-0"
GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL NOTES BSA LifeStructures
CONCRETE PAD, TYP AT 999 18th Street, N1625
2 ALL DOORS A. ALL LARGE EQUIPMENT TO SIT ON HOUSEKEEPING PADS; Denver, CO 80202
A3.11 COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION WITH SPECIFICATIONS AND
7'-0" 11'-5" MANUFACTURER ph 303.256.3300 fx 317.819.7288
A3.01 B. COOLING TOWERS TO SIT ON RAIL SYSTEM WITH FOUNDATION;
COORDINATE WITH BUILDING FOUNDATION TO PREVENT
9" BOLLARDS, 1 DIFFERENTIAL MOVEMENT BETWEEN THE SYSTEMS
TYP
100.1
5'-0"
3'-0" 7'-7" 8'-0" 6'-0" 8'-0" 6'-0" 8'-0" 12'-3" 3'-0"
100.4 100.3 100.2 3
CSU DCFC
FE
0"
1/8" / 12"
[No Slope]
UTILITY SINK, RE: PLUMBING
1/8" / 12"
1/8" / 12"
1/8" / 12"
1/8" / 12"
WORK SURFACE 1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12"
1/2" / 12"
17'-0"
1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12"
CONCRETE
CHILLERS, TYP EQUIPMENT PAD, TYP
RE: MECH DISTRICT COOLING FOR
20'-0"
3 A8.01 THE FOOTHILLS CAMPUS
1
CONCRETE EQUIPMENT A3.11
PAD; PAINT SAFETY CLIENT PROJECT NO. - 191024A
/ 12"
1/8"
YELLOW, TYP
10'-0"
-2 17/32"
BID PACK 01 - CIVIL SITE
"
/ 12
1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"
1/8"
-2 17/32" -2 17/32" -2 17/32"
1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12" 1/8" / 12"
PACKAGE
40'-0"
FUTURE -2 13/32" -2 13/32" -2 13/32"
2
6'-8"
2
EXPANSION
1/8" / 12"
FE A8.01
MECHANICAL
ROOM
32'-0"
100 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
A3.01 4 5/8" / 12" 0 06-23-2020 FOR INFORMATION ONLY (NIC)
1/8" / 12"
2 A3.01
20'-0"
1/8" / 12"
1/8" / 12"
1/8" / 12"
1/8 "
"/ 12 " 1/8
12 "/ 1/8
"/ 12 "/ 12
"
" 1/8 12 "/ 12
" "/
" 1/8 1/8
1/8" / 12"
1/8" / 12"
FRP COVERED GYP BD OVER 6" MTL CONCRETE
STUDS UP TO ROOF; RE: STRUCTURAL EQUIPMENT PAD;
FOR HEAD SLIP CONNECTION DETAIL PAINT SAFETY
ADD ALT - EXTRUDED PVC PANELS ON YELLOW, TYP FOR
FE STUDS INTERIOR PADS
0"
FE
1
1
A8.01
5'-0"
2'-5" 6'-5"
100.5
100.6
3
8'-0"
9" BOLLARDS, TYP
A3.01
11"
7'-0" 4'-7" CONCRETE SIDEWALK AROUND
PERIMETER; SLOPE AWAY FROM
BUILDING, RE: CIVIL
DOWNSPOUT, TYP
CONCRETE FOOTINGS, TYP RE:
STRUCTURAL
C:\Users\BMcMullen\Documents\20920002-ARCH_BSALS_CENTRAL_v2019_bmcmullen5E89A.rvt
COOLING TOWERS, TYP RE: MECH
GRAVEL, RE: CIVIL MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
DATE JUNE 23, 2020
MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
1 BSALS PROJECT NO. 20920002
1/4" = 1'-0"
0' 2' 4' 8'
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
A2.01
6/24/2020 9:13:23 AM
APPROVED Approver
Designer
Author
© BSA LifeStructures Inc.
DESIGNED
DRAWNPLAN NORTH
2
A3.11
CONTINUOUS GUTTER TO DOWNSPOUT
SNOW GUARD, TYP
BSA LifeStructures
999 18th Street, N1625
Denver, CO 80202
ph 303.256.3300 fx 317.819.7288
PRE-FINISHED METAL ROOF
SYSTEM BY PRE-ENGINEERED
METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER
CSU DCFC
4" / 12"
1
A3.11
DISTRICT COOLING FOR
FUTURE THE FOOTHILLS CAMPUS
EXPANSION CLIENT PROJECT NO. - 191024A
BID PACK 01 - CIVIL SITE
4" / 12"
PACKAGE
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
0 06-23-2020 FOR INFORMATION ONLY (NIC)
SNOW GUARD, TYP
CONTINUOUS GUTTER TO DOWNSPOUT
C:\Users\BMcMullen\Documents\20920002-ARCH_BSALS_CENTRAL_v2019_bmcmullen5E89A.rvt
ROOF PLAN
DATE JUNE 23, 2020
BSALS PROJECT NO. 20920002
A2.02
ROOF PLAN
1
1/4" = 1'-0"
6/24/2020 9:13:24 AM
0' 2' 4' 8'
APPROVED Approver
Designer
Author
© BSA LifeStructures Inc.
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
DESIGNED
DRAWNBSA LifeStructures
999 18th Street, N1625
Denver, CO 80202
ph 303.256.3300 fx 317.819.7288
CSU DCFC
3 2 1 D C B A
DISTRICT COOLING FOR
METAL PANEL COLOR A
METAL ROOF SYSTEM BY PRE-
ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING
CONTINUOUS GUTTER TO
DOWNSPOUT
THE FOOTHILLS CAMPUS
1 2
A3.11 MANUFACTURER
A3.11
FLAT METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. - 191024A
FLAT METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM BY DOWNSPOUT, TYP PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING
PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER;
12"
4" /
12" MANUFACTURER; BUTLER eSTYLEWALL II OR
4" /
BUTLER eSTYLEWALL II OR EQUIVALENT
EQUIVALENT BID PACK 01 - CIVIL SITE
ROOF EAVE ROOF EAVE
19' - 6"
METAL PANEL COLOR A
19' - 6" PACKAGE
MOBILE BACKUP GENERATOR,
RE: ELEC
NEW TRANSFORMER, MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
RE: ELEC 0 06-23-2020 FOR INFORMATION ONLY (NIC)
BOLLARD BEYOND
MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL
0' - 0" 0' - 0"
EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST
4 3
1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0"
0' 4' 8' 16' 0' 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
1 2 3 A B C D
RE: MECH AND PLUMBING
DRAWINGS FOR ALL ROOF AND METAL ROOF SYSTEM BY PRE-
1 2 WALL PENETRATIONS ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING
A3.11 A3.11
CENTER LIGHT OVER DOOR, TYP MANUFACTURER
CONTINUOUS GUTTER TO
12" 4" / DOWNSPOUT
4" / 12"
NEW TRANSFORMER,
RE: ELEC
ROOF EAVE ROOF EAVE
19' - 6" MOBILE BACKUP 19' - 6"
C:\Users\BMcMullen\Documents\20920002-ARCH_BSALS_CENTRAL_v2019_bmcmullen5E89A.rvt
GENERATOR, RE: ELEC
METAL PANEL COLOR A FLAT METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM BY
PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING
FLAT METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM BY MANUFACTURER;
PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING BUTLER eSTYLEWALL II OR
MANUFACTURER; EQUIVALENT
BUTLER eSTYLEWALL II OR
EQUIVALENT DOWNSPOUT, TYP.
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
METAL PANEL COLOR A
MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL
0' - 0" 0' - 0"
DATE JUNE 23, 2020
BSALS PROJECT NO. 20920002
A3.01
EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH
2
1/8" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST
6/24/2020 9:13:30 AM
0' 4' 8' 16' 1
APPROVED Approver
Designer
1/8" = 1'-0"
Author
0' 4' 8' 16'
© BSA LifeStructures Inc.
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
DESIGNED
DRAWN
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"BSA LifeStructures
999 18th Street, N1625
Denver, CO 80202
ph 303.256.3300 fx 317.819.7288
1 2 3
1
A3.11
4" /
12"
4" /
12"
CSU DCFC
ROOF EAVE
19' - 6"
DISTRICT COOLING FOR
THE FOOTHILLS CAMPUS
CLIENT PROJECT NO. - 191024A
BID PACK 01 - CIVIL SITE
PACKAGE
MAIN LEVEL
0' - 0"
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
0 06-23-2020 FOR INFORMATION ONLY (NIC)
BUILDING SECTION - E/W
2
3/16" = 1'-0" 0' 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
A B C D
2
A3.11
ROOF EAVE
19' - 6"
C:\Users\BMcMullen\Documents\20920002-ARCH_BSALS_CENTRAL_v2019_bmcmullen5E89A.rvt
MAIN LEVEL
0' - 0"
BUILDING SECTIONS
DATE JUNE 23, 2020
BUILDING SECTION - N/S
1 BSALS PROJECT NO. 20920002
3/16" = 1'-0" 0' 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"
A3.11
6/24/2020 9:13:34 AM
APPROVED Approver
Designer
Author
© BSA LifeStructures Inc.
DESIGNED
DRAWNMETAL ROOF SYSTEM BY PRE-ENGINEERED
METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER
SLIP CONNECTION AT TOP OF WALL, RE:
STRUCTURAL
TOP OF WALL TO FOLLOW SLOPE OF ROOF
FRP FINISH ADHERED TO GYPSUM WALL BSA LifeStructures
BOARD; ADD ALT - EXTRUDED PVC PANELS 999 18th Street, N1625
ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO METAL STUDS Denver, CO 80202
ph 303.256.3300 fx 317.819.7288
BLACK PHENOLIC RESIN WORK
TOP, TRESPA OR EQUIVALENT
BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL
BACK SPLASH 6" METAL STUDS
28" DEEP FREE STANDING
ADJUSTABLE HEIGHT MOBILE
CSU DCFC
TABLE FRAME BASE, KEWAUNEE FRP FINISH ADHERED TO GYPSUM WALL
ENTERPRISE WORKSTATION OR BOARD; ADD ALT - EXTRUDED PVC PANELS
EQUIVALENT
ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO METAL STUDS
CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD
5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0"
DISTRICT COOLING FOR
THE FOOTHILLS CAMPUS
3'-0"
FRP BASE TRIM AT BASE OF WALL; ALL
SIDES, TYP
MAIN LEVEL CLIENT PROJECT NO. - 191024A
0' - 0"
BID PACK 01 - CIVIL SITE
3
WORK BENCH ELEVATION
1/2" = 1'-0"
2
INTERIOR PARTITION WALL DETAIL
1 1/2" = 1'-0"
PACKAGE
0' 1' 2' 4' 0' 6" 1' 2'
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
0 06-23-2020 FOR INFORMATION ONLY (NIC)
1
FLAT METAL PANEL WALL SYSTEM BY PRE-
ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING
MANUFACTURER;
BUTLER eSTYLEWALL II OR EQUIVALENT EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION
BOARD INSTALLED ALONG FOUNDATION
WALL AND HORIZONTALLY FOR 24" MIN
AROUND PERIMETER OF BUILDING PER
METAL PANEL TO FOLLOW SLOPE OF IECC 2018
EXTERIOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK
BASE FLASHING CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE, RE:
STRUCTURAL
BITUMINOUS DAMPPROOFING
MAIN LEVEL
EXTERIOR CONCRETE SIDEWALK, RE: CIVIL 0' - 0"
FOR ELEVATIONS
2"
C:\Users\BMcMullen\Documents\20920002-ARCH_BSALS_CENTRAL_v2019_bmcmullen5E89A.rvt
DETAILS
DATE JUNE 23, 2020
BSALS PROJECT NO. 20920002
A8.01
6/24/2020 9:13:35 AM
TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAIL
1
APPROVED Approver
Designer
1 1/2" = 1'-0"
Author
0' 6" 1' 2'
© BSA LifeStructures Inc.
DESIGNED
DRAWN
SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"BSA LifeStructures
999 18th Street, N1625
Denver, CO 80202
ph 303.256.3300 fx 317.819.7288
CSU DCFC
VIEW FROM NORTHWEST
2
NOTE: DISTRICT COOLING FOR
PERSPECTIVE DRAWINGS ARE FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES
ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AS A BID OR THE FOOTHILLS CAMPUS
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT.
CLIENT PROJECT NO. - 191024A
BID PACK 01 - CIVIL SITE
PACKAGE
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
0 06-23-2020 FOR INFORMATION ONLY (NIC)
C:\Users\BMcMullen\Documents\20920002-ARCH_BSALS_CENTRAL_v2019_bmcmullen5E89A.rvt
PERSPECTIVES
DATE JUNE 23, 2020
BSALS PROJECT NO. 20920002
VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST
1
NOTE:
AXONOMETRIC DRAWINGS ARE FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES
A10.01
6/24/2020 9:13:42 AM
ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AS A BID OR
APPROVED Approver
Designer
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT.
Author
© BSA LifeStructures Inc.
DESIGNED
DRAWNFCMaps
Legend
FEMA Floodplain
FEMA High Risk - Floodway
FEMA High Risk - 100 Year
FEMA Moderate Risk - 100 / 500 Year
FEMA Map Panel
City Floodplains
City High Risk - Floodway
City High Risk - 100 Year
City Moderate Risk - 100 Year
City Limits
9,027
1,504.5
1: 6,859
Notes
1,143.0 0 571.50 1,143.0 Feet
This map is a user generated static output from the City of Fort Collins FCMaps
Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable.
City of Fort Collins - GISFoothills Chiller Plant cost estimate
Project Budget Remarks
Professional Services
Site Survey, Geotechnical 25,000
Consultants - Architects, Engineers, Vibration, Acoustics 476,900
Commissioning and Advertisements 10,000
FM project development fee 262,295
Independent Code Review, code insp, material tests 13,495
PFA plan review 3,365
Total Professional Services 791,055
Construction
construction cost/sf includes chiller plant
New Space - 3400 gsf 2,491,525 equipment
Site Work Service/Utilities 2,277,475 chilled water piping to buildings
Site Improvements/Landscaping 340,000
Subtotal Construction Costs 5,109,000
Equipment & Furnishings
Fixed Equipment 0
Moveable Equipment
CSU Communications/AV 17,000 $5/sf
CSU Notifyer system 6,000
Total Equipment and Furnishings Costs 23,000
Miscellaneous
Total Miscellaneous Costs 0
Subtotal Project Cost 5,923,055
Project Contingency
Project Contingency 58% 476,900
Total Contingency 476,900
Budget- Occupancy in Jan 2022 $ 6,399,955
This opinion of probable cost is made on the basis of experience, qualifications and best judgement of a professional cost consultant familiar with the construction
industry, combined with the professional experience of Facilities Management. FM cannot guarantee that proposals, bids or actual construction costs will not vary
from this cost estimate due to market conditions at the time of the bid.
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
Facilities Planning Design and ConstructionYou can also read
