FRBSF Economic Letter - Federal ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
FRBSF Economic Letter 2022-07 | March 28, 2022 | Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Why Is U.S. Inflation Higher than in Other Countries? Òscar Jordà, Celeste Liu, Fernanda Nechio, and Fabián Rivera-Reyes Inflation rates in the United States and other developed economies have closely tracked each other historically. Problems with global supply chains and changes in spending patterns due to the COVID-19 pandemic have pushed up inflation worldwide. However, since the first half of 2021, U.S. inflation has increasingly outpaced inflation in other developed countries. Estimates suggest that fiscal support measures designed to counteract the severity of the pandemic’s economic effect may have contributed to this divergence by raising inflation about 3 percentage points by the end of 2021. Few people would question the devastating economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in a dramatic collapse in economic activity and loss in employment worldwide. The United States introduced unprecedented fiscal and monetary policy responses to provide rapid economic relief. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law in March 2020. In the same month, the Federal Reserve lowered the target range for the federal funds rate to 0–¼% and introduced additional measures to ease liquidity. As we begin the third year since the start of the pandemic, the U.S. economy has rebounded at an astonishing rate. Unemployment recovered from a high of 14.7% in April 2020 to 3.8% in February 2022. Meanwhile, the gap between actual GDP and its potential rate has nearly closed to less than 0.5%, as calculated by the Congressional Budget Office. However, global supply chain distortions persist, and subsequent waves of COVID-19 infections continue to disrupt service-oriented industries. There are many reasons to expect inflation to be higher than normal (Barnichon, Oliveira, and Shapiro 2021; Bianchi, Fisher, and Melosi 2021; Shapiro 2021a,b). In this Economic Letter we widen the recent analysis with an international comparison. Though many of the pandemic distortions are common to other countries, we show that U.S. inflation has risen more quickly and increasingly diverged from inflation in other OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. In seeking an explanation, we turn to the combination of direct fiscal support introduced to counteract the economic devastation caused by the pandemic. Importantly, we trace the effect of these measures over time. The interplay between when assistance was delivered and how households responded to successive COVID waves created complicated dynamics in the economy. Building these dynamics into a simple model suggests that they may have contributed to about 3 percentage points of the rise in U.S. inflation through the end of 2021.
FRBSF Economic Letter 2022-07 March 28, 2022
U.S. inflation is now higher than abroad
One way to illustrate what has happened with U.S. inflation is to compare it with the average rate of
inflation across a group of OECD economies: Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands,
Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. We rely on core inflation measures, which remove the more
volatile food and energy prices. To align with what is available in all the countries in our study, we use
consumer price index (CPI) inflation instead of the personal consumption expenditures price index, the
preferred measure of inflation used by the Federal Reserve.
The blue line in Figure 1 displays the Figure 1
year-over-year percent changes in U.S. Annual core CPI inflation: U.S. versus OECD
core CPI inflation. The figure also
Percent
shows the median (red line) and the 6
range between the 25% and 75%
largest values (also known as the 5
interquartile range and shown by the
shaded area) of inflation for our OECD 4 United States
sample. A tighter range indicates that
3
most OECD countries in our sample
experienced inflation rates similar to
2
each other. The figure shows that,
before the pandemic, U.S. core CPI
1
inflation remained, on average, about 1
OECD sample median
percentage point above the OECD 0
sample average. The small difference 2019 2020 2021
between U.S. and OECD inflation Note: Shaded area reflects interquartile range for OECD sample.
Source: OECD Household Dashboard: cross country comparisons.
during this period is well known as
many of the OECD countries struggled to get inflation up to target following the Global Financial Crisis and
subsequent euro-area sovereign debt crisis.
By early 2021, however, U.S. inflation increasingly diverged from the other countries. U.S. core CPI grew
from below 2% to above 4% and stayed elevated throughout 2021. In contrast, our OECD sample average
increased at a more gradual rate from around 1% to 2.5% by the end of 2021. These differences in inflation
readings cannot be explained by measurement issues.
U.S. direct fiscal transfers are also higher than abroad
While all countries have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, policy responses have varied
considerably. Beyond efforts to limit the spread of the virus, the availability of testing, and vaccine
distribution, how countries handled providing economic support differed primarily in terms of size and
scope. It is difficult to tally the measures adopted across all countries. Even within the United States,
different states had varying degrees of unemployment assistance, direct household transfers, child support,
business loans, and other pandemic assistance programs.
2FRBSF Economic Letter 2022-07 March 28, 2022
One way to get a read on this tangle of support programs is to directly measure disposable personal income
in each country. This measures the amount individuals have left to spend or save after paying taxes and
receiving government transfer payments. It is a relatively comparable measure across countries that
incorporates the overall magnitude of net pandemic transfers.
Figure 2 shows an index for per capita Figure 2
inflation-adjusted disposable personal Real personal disposable income: U.S. versus OECD
income—real disposable income, for
Index: 2019:Q4=100
short—for the United States and for 120
the median and interquartile range
115
across the sample of OECD economies. United States
The figure shows that, throughout 110
2020 and 2021, U.S. households
experienced significantly higher 105
increases in their disposable income
100
relative to their OECD peers.
95 OECD sample median
Specifically, the two peaks in U.S.
90
disposable personal income reflect the
CARES Act, signed into law on March 85
27, 2020, and the American Rescue 2019 2020 2021
Plan (ARP) Act of 2021, signed about a Note: Shaded area reflects interquartile range for OECD sample.
year later. Both Acts resulted in an Source: OECD Household Dashboard: cross country comparisons.
unprecedented injection of direct
assistance with a relatively short duration. In contrast, real disposable personal income for our OECD
sample increased only moderately during the pandemic.
Did more disposable income turn into more inflation?
Figures 1 and 2 suggest that the higher rate of inflation in the United States may relate in part to its
stronger fiscal response. One way to assess the possible connection is using a Phillips curve framework.
In the Phillips curve, inflation is frequently expressed as a function of inflation expectations, lagged
inflation, and a measure of a gap in economic activity. That is, inflation reflects a combination of the
public’s views on future inflation, inflation inertia, and how hot the economy is running. Because of the
array of policy measures introduced during the pandemic to counterbalance the economic effects of
lockdowns, common labor market statistics, such as the unemployment gap, are not as reliable. Therefore,
we turn to real disposable income to better capture the demand side of the economy. Moreover, the fiscal
measures introduced to fight the pandemic were somewhat unexpected in that their passage, size, and
scope were not known with certainty.
Using the Phillips curve logic, we can reasonably compute the effect of pandemic support measures on the
inflation forecast. The idea is to compare countries that, like the United States, introduced aggressive
3FRBSF Economic Letter 2022-07 March 28, 2022
support measures, which we call the policy “active” group, versus the less aggressive, or policy “passive,”
group before and after the pandemic. Dividing the data by time and by country is a common statistical
strategy used to find the effects of a policy. The intuition is that those countries with a less generous policy
response act as a control group before and after the pandemic. If the measures introduced by the United
States and other countries in the active group had no effect on inflation, the set of passive and active
countries should exhibit similar inflation paths. The extent to which they do not can help us measure the
effect of active policies on inflation in that country.
For the model, we measure inflation using core CPI and construct one-year-ahead inflation expectations
for each country by predicting CPI future observations from a history of 20 years of inflation data as in
Hamilton et al. (2016). We construct the real disposable income gap by removing the historical trend from
the data and comparing it with a scenario that extends the pre-pandemic trend through to the pandemic
period. In addition, since households do not immediately spend the income they receive, we smooth the
data using a four-quarter rolling average of the detrended series. Finally, our estimation method accounts
for common variation over time in the evolution of the pandemic and the policies implemented, while
allowing for differences in inflation across countries.
With these elements in place, we
estimate our model and use it to Figure 3
construct an inflation path scenario. In U.S. inflation versus scenario minus pandemic fiscal support
particular, we calculate what inflation Percent
6
would have been if U.S. pandemic
5
support measures had been as
4 Core CPI year-over-year change
moderate as the passive group of
countries. Figure 3 reports actual U.S. 3
core CPI inflation against this scenario. 2
The green shaded area shows the 1
degree of uncertainty around our
0
estimates. This version of the Phillips
-1 Scenario estimate
curve performs reasonably well and is
without fiscal support
comparable to historical estimates -2
using measures of slack based on the -3
deviation of output from its potential -4
or unemployment from its natural rate. 2018 2019 2020 2021
Importantly, however, our model Note: Shaded area reflects degree of uncertainty around scenario estimates.
Source: OECD Household Dashboard: cross country comparisons and authors’
allows for potential shifts in how calculations.
inflation responded to economic slack
during the pandemic.
The comparison between the actual path of inflation and our scenario in Figure 3 suggests that U.S. income
transfers may have contributed to an increase in inflation of about 3 percentage points by the fourth
quarter of 2021. As the shaded area in Figure 3 indicates, however, this relatively sizable contribution is
estimated with considerable uncertainty because the available sample is too short for any greater precision.
4FRBSF Economic Letter 2022-07 March 28, 2022
Our estimates fall in the upper range of findings from other recent research, although those findings fall well
within our estimated confidence range. As Bianchi et al. (2021) point out, alternative modeling frameworks
can result in different estimates. Barnichon et al. (2021), for example, indirectly find a much smaller, though
statistically significant, contribution from fiscal measures using historical U.S. data and relying on a new
measure of labor market slack. Our analysis expands on past studies by using a different sample, a different
measure of slack—the disposable income gap—for an international sample, and allowing for the possibility
that the pandemic shifted traditional economic relationships.
Conclusion
The United States is experiencing higher rates of inflation than other advanced economies. In this Economic
Letter we argue that, among other reasons explored by the literature, the sizable fiscal support measures
aimed at counteracting the economic collapse due to the COVID-19 pandemic could explain about 3
percentage points of the recent rise in inflation. However, without these spending measures, the economy
might have tipped into outright deflation and slower economic growth, the consequences of which would
have been harder to manage.
Òscar Jordà is a senior policy advisor in the Economic Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco.
Celeste Liu is a research associate in the Economic Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco.
Fernanda Nechio is a vice president in the Economic Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco.
Fabián Rivera-Reyes is a research associate in the Economic Research Department of the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco.
References
Barnichon, Regis, Luiz Oliveira, and Adam Shapiro. 2021. “Is the American Rescue Plan Taking Us Back to the ’60s?”
FRBSF Economic Letter 2021-27 (October 18). https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2021/october/is-american-rescue-plan-taking-us-back-to-1960s/
Bianchi, Francesco, Jonas D.M. Fisher, and Leonardo Melosi. 2021. “Some Inflation Scenarios for the American Rescue
Plan Act of 2021.” Chicago Fed Letter 453, April. https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-
letter/2021/453
Hamilton, James D., Ethan S. Harris, Jan Hatzius, and Kenneth D. West. 2016. “The Equilibrium Real Funds Rate: Past,
Present, and Future.” IMF Economic Review 64(4, November), pp. 660–707.
Shapiro, Adam H. 2021a. “Weighing the Role of Supply Bottlenecks in Core PCE Inflation.” SF Fed Blog, May 18.
https://www.frbsf.org/our-district/about/sf-fed-blog/weighing-role-supply-bottlenecks-in-core-pce-inflation/
Shapiro, Adam H. 2021b. “What’s Behind the Recent Rise in Core Inflation?” SF Fed Blog, June 18.
https://www.frbsf.org/our-district/about/sf-fed-blog/whats-behind-recent-rise-in-core-inflation/
Opinions expressed in FRBSF Economic Letter do not necessarily reflect the views of the management
of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. This publication is edited by Anita Todd and Karen Barnes. Permission to reprint portions of
articles or whole articles must be obtained in writing. Please send editorial comments and requests for
reprint permission to research.library@sf.frb.orgFRBSF Economic Letter 2022-07 March 28, 2022
Recent issues of FRBSF Economic Letter are available at
https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/
2022-06 Jargalsaikhan / How Are Businesses Responding to Climate Risk?
Leduc / https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2022/march/how-
Oliveira are-businesses-responding-to-climate-risk/
2022-05 Daly This Time Is Different…Because We Are
https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2022/february/this-time-is-different-because-we-are-speech/
2022-04 Barnichon / What’s the Best Measure of Economic Slack?
Shapiro https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2022/february/what-is-best-measure-of-economic-slack/
2022-03 Lansing / Will Rising Rents Push Up Future Inflation?
Oliveira / https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2022/february/will-
Shapiro rising-rents-push-up-future-inflation/
2022-02 Albert / Searching for Maximum Employment
Valletta https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2022/february/searching-for-maximum-employment/
2022-01 Cúrdia Average Inflation Targeting in the Financial Crisis Recovery
https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2022/january/average-inflation-targeting-in-financial-crisis-recovery/
2021-33 Hall / Comparing Pandemic Unemployment to Past U.S. Recoveries
Kudlyak https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2021/november/comparing-pandemic-unemployment-to-past-us-recoveries/
2021-32 Albert / Employment Effects of COVID-19 across States, Sectors
Foerster / https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
Sarte letter/2021/november/employment-effects-of-covid-19-across-states-sectors/
2021-31 Daly Policymaking in a Time of Uncertainty
https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2021/november/policymaking-in-time-of-uncertainty/
2021-30 Tarasewicz / How Strongly Are Local Economies Tied to COVID-19?
Wilson https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2021/november/how-strongly-are-local-economies-tied-to-covid-19/
2021-29 Christensen / What Would It Cost to Issue 50-year Treasury Bonds?
Lopez / https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
Mussche letter/2021/november/what-would-it-cost-to-issue-50-year-treasury-bonds/
2021-28 Bauer / Climate Change Costs Rise as Interest Rates Fall
Rudebusch / https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2021/october/climate-change-costs-rise-as-interest-rates-fall/
2021-27 Barnichon / Is the American Rescue Plan Taking Us Back to the ‘60s?
Oliveira / https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2021/october/is-
Shapiro american-rescue-plan-taking-us-back-to-1960s/
2021-26 Daly From Gaps to Growth: Equity as a Path to Prosperity
https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-
letter/2021/october/from-gaps-to-growth-equity-as-path-to-prosperity/You can also read
