Implementation and Evolution of eRUC HCV Perspective - NZ and USA - July 2018 Nina Elter - IBTTA
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Implementation and Evolution of eRUC HCV Perspective – NZ and USA July 2018 Nina Elter VP Global Market Development – EROAD IBTTA Finance Summit 2018
AGENDA
• About EROAD
• Evolution of eRUC in NZ
• Implementation of eWMT in
Oregon
• I-95 Multi-State Truck Pilot
• Downstream benefits of eRUC
2
Road Tax and Heavy Commercial Vehicles
Simple: easy to Robust: little Affordable: low Fair: everyone pays
understand and scope for evasion cost to administer their fair share and
to comply with and meaningful and high return on gets fair value in
enforcement effort return
3
Evolution of eRUC: NZ
NZ eRUC Evolution
Independent review of ERUC became
Road User Charges RUC and explore use of Revised RUC Act largest service
(RUC) introduced electronic RUC in NZ simplified RUC process channel for HV
in NZ RUC
2009
2012
2015
1977
2010
2007
2014
2017
EROAD field trial of MoT approves ERUC Code of Practice HV ERUC >50% of all
Ehubo distance recorder EROAD introduced HV RUC
• Ehubo approved as 1st
electronic distance recorder in
NZ
• EROAD approved as
electronic service provider to
issue distance licenses
5
EROAD: eRUC Innovation 6
Government: Technology facilitation
• Market-based delivery of eRUC services by
commercial vendors
• Government and industry collaboration to
develop authoritative standards and an
industry Code of Practice
• Self-certification with independent
verification to balance
7
Improved Industry Acceptance
Before 2009-12 Reforms After 2009-12 Reforms
Simple
Complex: paper-based Easier: through eRUC
Costly: time-consuming, cash Afford- Cheaper: less work, more precise
intensive able charging
Porous: nominated weight gave Robust: GVM-based price gives much
Robust
ample scope to evade less scope for evasion
Unfair: over-charged and under- Accepted: reasonable charges set
invested Fair transparently
Opposed: Called for a diesel tax to Final Supported: Engaged in refining
replace RUC Verdict eRUC on an ongoing basis
8
United States 9
Oregon – The Pioneer State
1st state to Satellite based OReGO
introduce Fuel RUC system Project
Tax piloted introduced
1933 2014
1919 1995 2015
Weight Mile Tax GNSS based
System WMT system
implemented launched
10OR: Implementation of electronic Weight-Mile Tax Collection 11
I-95 Corridor
Boston, Massachusetts
14 states + D.C.
Along the Corridor
2nd
New York, New York
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Largest Economy in
Washington, D.C.
the World
$4.7 Trillion
Raleigh, North Carolina 40% of US GDP
37%
Charleston, South Carolina
46
Of America’s
Savannah, Georgia population:
110 Million people
Major Seaports
Orlando, Florida $172 Billion Imports
34% of U.S. total
12 Miami, FloridaFirst multi-state truck pilot
• 50 vehicles equipped with EROAD GNSS
hardware for six month.
• EROAD to help study if there are potential
synergies in the data collected for the
various regulations and agreements
already in place i.e. IFTA.
• Steering Committee members include
IBTTA and the American Trucking
Association.
Trucks have been
collecting MBUF data
for decades as part of Example of One Truck’s Trip Within the I-95 Corridor
the International
Fuel Tax Agreement
(IFTA)
13Downstream
benefits of eRUC
14Road User benefits 15
Road Manager benefits 16
Investor benefits 17
Public benefits 18
Conclusion
• The goals of compliant heavy vehicle operators are
often more aligned than not with the goals of public
value delivering agencies
• Experience shows that eRUC systems can offer:
1. a step up in capability both for commercial
operators and for road managers,
2. A reduction in the traditional frustrations that cause
tension between these parties
• This is not guaranteed – it must be recognized,
valued, and designed for.
19THANK YOU Nina Elter VP Global Market Development - EROAD nina.elter@eroad.com
You can also read
