Making licensed venues safer for patrons: what environmental factors should be the focus of interventions?

 
CONTINUE READING
(T&F) CDAR230104

Drug and Alcohol Review (March 2004), 23, 19 – 29

SPECIAL SECTION: PREVENTION

Making licensed venues safer for patrons: what environmental factors
should be the focus of interventions?

ROSS HOMEL1, RUSSELL CARVOLTH2, MARGE HAURITZ3 GILLIAN MCILWAIN1 &
ROSIE TEAGUE4
1
 School of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance, Griffith University,
2
 Policy and Projects, Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Services, Queensland Health, 3Mt Gravatt East and 4School of
Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia

Abstract
The Queensland Safety Action Projects operationalized a problem-focused responsive regulatory model in order to make
nightclubs and other venues safer. A problem-focused approach requires a careful analysis of the total environment of licensed
venues, including drinking and its controls but also the social and physical environments, patron mix and management practices.
We present new analyses of observational data collected in 1994 and 1996 in the north Queensland cities of Cairns, Townsville
and Mackay. Major reductions in aggression and violence were observed, as well as improvements in many aspects of the venue
environment and management practices. We do not argue in this paper that the interventions caused the environmental and
management changes, although we believe this to be true. Rather, our assumption is that whatever caused them, some of the
environmental and management changes were critical to the reductions in aggression. Regression techniques were used to identify
those factors that best explained the declines in aggression. For reduced physical violence four key predictors were identified:
improved comfort, availability of public transport, less overt sexual activity and fewer highly drunk men. For reduced non-
physical aggression, four key predictors were: fewer Pacific Islander patrons, less male swearing, fewer intoxicated patrons
requiring that management be called and more chairs with armrests. The analyses are consistent with the argument that the
control of drinking is necessary but not sufficient to reduce aggression and violence. [Homel R, Carvolth R, Hauritz M,
McIlwain G, Teague R. Making licensed venues safer for patrons: what environmental factors should be the focus of
interventions? Drug Alcohol Rev 2004;23:19 – 29]

Key words: alcohol, licensed venues, nightclubs, regulation violence, safety.

Introduction                                                                   community-based interventions to answer the question:
                                                                               what were the key observable changes within licensed
The focus of this paper is the regulation of public                            environments most closely related to the large declines
drinking places, which provide the settings for between                        in violence and aggression that were recorded between
one quarter and three quarters of all alcohol consump-                         two waves of observations in 1994 and 1996.
tion, depending on the country and the statistical                                The point of addressing this question is to sharpen
measures used ([1], Table 3.2). More exactly, our focus                        the focus of interventions designed to make licensed
is licensed venues, in particular nightclubs in city centre                    venues safer. The logic of the analyses is that only
entertainment areas in the Australian state of Queens-                         environmental and management factors that changed
land. We aim to use a reanalysis of the evaluation data                        between 1994 and 1996 were likely to be causally
we collected as part of a series of carefully designed                         related to the declines in aggression or violence

Ross Homel PhD, Professor and Head, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Deputy Director, Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and
Governance, Griffith University, Australia; Russell Carvolth OAM, BA Hons, Manager, Policy and Projects, Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug
Services, Queensland Health; Marge Hauritz PhD, Consultant, Mt Gravatt East; Gillian McIlwain BA (Hons), PhD student, School of
Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University; Rosie Teague BA (Hons), PhD student, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University,
Australia. Correspondence to Ross Homel, Professor and Head, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Deputy Director, Key Centre for
Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance, Griffith University, Australia. E-mail: R.Homel@griffith.edu.au
Received 1 August 2003; accepted for publication 27 October 2003.

ISSN 0959-5236 print/ISSN 1465-3362 online/04/010019–11 # Australian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs
DOI: 10.1080/09595230410001645529
20    Ross Homel et al.

(whatever other non-observed changes might also have            commonly the implicit understanding that venues will
had a causal impact), and that knowledge of such                be left alone by police and liquor licensing officials if
factors provides a better basis for prevention planning         there is no trouble serious enough to attract media or
than a smorgasbord of risk factors derived from                 political attention. We would now add as part of the
correlational analyses of cross-sectional data [2].             ‘not directly observable’ a range of community and
Whether it was the interventions or other processes             political influences, and the effects of regulatory and
extraneous to the project that caused the extensive             market reform (including national competition policy)
environmental changes does not need to be adjudicated           [4,5].
for the purposes of this paper: it is sufficient to establish      Regulation, if it is to be any use, therefore requires an
that change in both the environment and in rates of             understanding of the actual problem in all its aspects,
violence occurred.                                              and the formulation of effective tools for its solution.
   Our starting point is not simply that alcohol is a           This paper focuses on the part of the problem that is
commodity [1], it is that the settings in which it is           directly observable: the social and physical environment
consumed are also part of an intensely competitive              of nightclubs. The less easily observed aspects, such as
market. Nightclubs and bars do not sell only liquor;            community influences, are discussed in detail else-
they sell food, entertainment, excitement and perhaps           where, in combination with analysis of effective
drugs and they provide—at a cost—spaces for stren-              countermeasures that incorporate community pro-
uous physical activity, for meeting others, for sexual          cesses and formal regulation (see especially [6 – 8]).
liaisons and generally for behaving outrageously with              In the next section we describe briefly the Safety
relative impunity. In short, nightclubs are businesses,         Action Projects in north Queensland and the processes
and their business is pleasure. Unfortunately, God              of data collection, summarising the pre- and post-
being a Puritan, pleasure has its price. We know well           intervention changes in aggression and violence that
that drinking is a sin and what the wages are, but the          were observed in clubs, as well as the numerous
divine economy does not stop there. Popping pills and           changes that occurred in their physical and social
becoming thirsty, competing for women (or men),                 environments and in management practices. These
being offside with an aggressive bouncer, being                 data have not been published previously, except in a
chronically uncomfortable after standing for a long             limited circulation report [9]. These changes form the
period, being crushed in a crowd, becoming deafened             basis for a more detailed statistical investigation of
by loud music, or growing just simply hungry or tired           environmental and management factors that appear to
can also have negative effects on individual health,            be linked intimately with the reductions in aggression
standards of group behaviour and public order. It is not        and violence. We conclude with some reflections on
necessary to be drunk—no one in the place has to be             critical factors for violence reduction, and on how we
drunk—to encounter danger on the dance floor or                 might move closer to the ideal of a problem-focused,
bullies at the bar.                                             responsive regulatory model.
   The point we are making is not simply a light-hearted
observation on Nightclubs We Have Known. Licensed
                                                                The North Queensland Safety Action projects
venues are multi-faceted places that make a great deal
of money for the people that own them. Making them              The Safety Action approach was piloted at Surfers
safer is therefore a challenge with many faces, doubly          Paradise in an evaluated implementation during 9
difficult if economic interests are at stake. Any               months of 1994 [10,11]. The North Queensland
approach to regulating licensed venues must therefore           projects were replications of the Surfers Paradise Safety
be based on a realistic analysis of the actual problem.         Action model in Cairns, Townsville and Mackay
   Putting this another way, we have always been of the         between 1994 and 1996 [6]. Aggression and violence
view that the preoccupation of some alcohol researchers         were targeted by addressing the three levels of regula-
with host responsibility, server training programmes            tion manipulated in the Safety Action model: support-
and so on does not so much miss the point as reflect an         ing improvements in formal state regulation; providing
incomplete understanding of the problem. The pro-               a mechanism for community support of the formal
blem, as we saw it when we began this line of research a        regulation; and facilitating self- and peer-regulatory
decade ago [3], is the ‘total environment’, which               compliance. This ‘tripartism’ is a feature of a form of
includes drinking and the other kinds of observable             regulation that is responsive to industry context and
factors referred to above, but also includes what is not        structure, regulatory culture and history, and which
directly observable. What we originally had in mind             also incorporates ‘tit-for-tat’ strategies that combine
concerning the ‘not directly observable’ was mainly the         punishment and persuasion in an optimum mix, and
hidden deals that are so characteristic of this industry—       ‘enforced self-regulation’, in which private sets of rules
in the worst cases, the agreements by police to back off        written by business (such as Codes of Practice) are
certain premises if the price is right, but more                ratified publicly and, when there is a failure of private
Making licensed venues safer for patrons   21

regulation, are enforced publicly [12]. The interven-        20.5% late, while in 1996 the figures were, respectively,
tions focused on: representation to authorities regard-      45.7%, 34.0% and 20.3% (w2(2) = 0.08). Nearly all
ing critical regulatory change and refinement; the           visits in both years took place on Thursday, Friday and
building of community level monitoring and informal          Saturday nights, with almost identical distributions in
processes to improve the quality of operations of            each year.
venues; the development of a network of co-operation            A structured, systematic observation technique was
and pressure for better practice among formerly              employed, based on an observation schedule of 20
isolated and mistrustful venue operators; and the            pages consisting of hundreds of items. A draft of the
enhancement of external safety through improved              original observation schedule was prepared, based on
attention by authorities to such issues as observability,    the qualitative open coding scheme devised for a 1989
lighting and adequacy of public transport.                   study [3] and on the study by Graham and colleagues
                                                             [13]. This was then tested and refined in a series of pilot
                                                             visits.
Data collection
                                                                Students recruited from local universities and col-
A key evaluation strategy was unobtrusive observation        leges observed in mixed-sex groups of three or four to
of aggression and violence, drinking and serving             ensure their safety when leaving in the early hours of the
practices and numerous characteristics of patrons and        morning. Those recruited tended to be ‘street smart’
of the physical and social environments in licensed          and had a general familiarity with licensed venues. At
venues pre- and post-intervention. Only the features of      least three students of Aboriginal or Islander descent
the data collection methods that bear most directly on       were employed in each city, and these students were
the interpretation of the environmental changes are          used in venues where non-Indigenous students would
reported here. These features have to do mainly with         have felt particularly out of place. Students were told in
assessing the reliability of the data and whether the data   a general way about the aims of the research, but care
from the 2 years can be compared validly.                    was taken in training in 1996 to avoid setting up an
   Activities in all the nightclubs and hotels in the        expectancy that violence levels would be lower than in
central entertainment areas of Cairns, Townsville and        1994. Almost none of the observers in 1996 had
Mackay were observed by teams of students during             performed the 1994 observations, and in any case it
September 1994 (before the interventions) and October        would have been very difficult for observers to have
1996 (after the interventions). Cafeterias and restau-       remembered what levels of violence obtained in 1994.
rants were excluded. All observation sessions were of        The use of different observers in the 2 years reduced the
about 2 hours’ duration and were unobtrusive. In 1994,       likelihood of conscious or unconscious exaggerations in
83 visits were made to 28 venues, while in 1996 116          post-intervention ratings.
visits were made to 47 venues. More venues were                 Several training sessions were conducted to ensure
visited in 1996 than in 1994, especially in Cairns,          that students were thoroughly familiar with the observa-
because many new venues had been established in that         tion schedule. It was emphasized during training that
period, and it was considered important to include all       observers were there for scientific purposes, and that
operating premises in the area. The growth in the            although they should act as normal patrons their job was
number of venues reflected an influx of tourism              not to have a good time but to observe as comprehen-
investors and an upsurge in the number of tourist and        sively and as accurately as possible, and to especially
entertainment premises generally across the three cities,    record details of all incidents of aggression or physical
particularly in Cairns. Some refurbishment and up-           violence of which they became aware. A limit of one
grading was also noted over this period. The original        alcoholic drink per hour was imposed for each observer.
aim was to visit each establishment three times, once        Observers’ responses to items in the observation
early in the evening (commencing between 10 p.m. and         schedule were calibrated for consistency within and
midnight), once in the mid-period (commencing                across groups. Each observer completed the survey form
between midnight and 2 a.m.) and once late (commen-          in isolation as soon as possible after the visit, and then at
cing after 2 a.m.). This was almost achieved in 1994,        a subsequent meeting inconsistencies between obser-
but the greater number of venues in 1996 meant that          vers were checked and agreement established. Inter-
the mean number of visits per venue was only 2.5.            rater agreement levels exceeded 85%, reflecting the fact
Premises visited less than three times were mainly those     that unreliable items were modified or eliminated in the
that closed early (before 3 a.m., often earlier).            original development of the instrument in Sydney in
   Because aggression and violence tend to occur more        1991, using large numbers of students [3].
frequently toward closing time, it is important that the        Graham and her colleagues [13] noted especially that
distribution of visits across time periods be equivalent     the decision whether a particular incident should be
in 1994 and 1996. This was achieved thus: in 1994 the        deemed aggression is one of the major problems of data
distribution was 44.6% early, 34.9% mid-period and           collection. In their study, to obtain some consistency
22    Ross Homel et al.

operational guidelines were adopted which stipulated              spacing and comfort of tables and chairs, ventilation,
that an incident would be classified as aggression if it          the cleanliness of female toilets, and the availability of
involved ‘personal violation (verbal insult, unwanted             taxis and public transport. The biggest changes were to
physical contact), behaviour that was offensive according         do with seating style, arrangements and comfort
to the norms of the place, or a dispute in which the              (improvements in style and spacing but some reduc-
participants had personal investment’ (p. 281). The same          tions in comfort), increases in crowding (with larger
guidelines were adopted for the present study (and in our         numbers of patrons), cleaner female toilets and better
previous research), which means that as in the Vancouver          availability of taxis and public transport.
research there was some variation from establishment to
establishment in the precise operationalization of what
was physical or non-physical aggression.                          Venue security. The total number of security personnel
                                                                  did not increase, and police were most conspicuous by
                                                                  their absence, at least in uniform. This is consistent with
Observed changes
                                                                  the observations of Homel, Tomsen & Thommeny [3] in
Aggression and violence (Fig. 1). Very extensive changes          their research in Sydney. The main changes were to do
across virtually every domain were observed in the                with bouncer interactions with patrons and the nature of
north Queensland replications, matching or exceeding              their patrolling. Generally there was more friendly
the changes observed in Surfers Paradise. Arguments               interaction, and a trend towards a more cheerful, relaxed
declined by 28.2%, verbal abuse by 60.4% and                      and pleasant demeanour (from 48.3% to 62.1% of visits).
challenges/threats by 40.5% at a time when all these              Perhaps the most important change in security arrange-
forms of aggression were increasing in Surfers Paradise           ments was a trend away from aimless roaming within
[14]. Trends in physical violence in the north and in             venues to a more ‘problem focused’ approach that
Surfers are shown in Fig. 1 (assault rates declined by            directed staff resources to possible points of friction,
81.2% between 1994 and 1996 in the north).                        such as aisles and bars (from 13.6% to 31.9% of visits).
                                                                  There was also more stationary patrolling, reducing the
                                                                  risks of unnecessary confrontations with patrons while
The physical environment (Table 1). Apart from a general          affording the opportunity to keep most of the establish-
increase in the total number of venues, the basic                 ment under surveillance. In keeping with the Codes of
physical infrastructure of venues did not change much             Practice, these strategies were combined with more
between 1994 and 1996. Thus features such as seating              rigorous ID checks at the door.
design, degree of renovation, general appearance and
upkeep, and ‘theme’ did not change. However, many
specific elements of the physical environment, espe-              The social environment (Table 2). Comfort levels moved
cially those most influenced by day-to-day management             toward a ‘medium’ rating, with fewer visits being rated
practices, did change, sometimes markedly, and mainly             at the extremes of ‘very comfortable’ or ‘uncomforta-
in the ‘right’ direction. Lighting improved, as did the           ble’. A possible explanation for this trend is that venue

                              Figure 1. Observed rates of assault; n = 183 due to missing values.
Making licensed venues safer for patrons    23

 Table 1. Statistically significant changes in the physical environment of venues in the three cities combined, 1994 and 1996 (p 5 0.05)

                                            1994 (n = 83) %         1996 (n = 116) %                                      Gamma or
Variable                                       or meana                or meana                      pb                   effect sizec

Seating comfort                                                                                   0.04                        0.31
  Adequate                                        67.6                     52.2
  Too few                                         32.4                     47.8
Spaced comfortable tables and chairs                                                              0.045                       0.50
  Yes                                             60.2                     74.1
  No                                              39.8                     25.9
Chairs with armrests                                                                              0.04                        0.35
  Yes                                             37.5                     55.3
  No                                              62.5                     44.7
Standing room only                                                                                0.001                       0.58
  Yes                                             33.3                     56.2
  No                                              66.7                     34.8
Female toilets                                                                                    0.03                        0.32
  Clean                                           50.7                     66.7
  Dirty                                           49.3                     33.3
Availability of taxis                                                                             0.001                       0.44
  Available                                       48.6                     71.2
  Limited                                         17.6                     16.2
  None                                            33.8                     12.6
Availability of public transport                                                                  0.0001                      0.85
  Available                                        1.4                     21.7
  Limited                                          7.2                     34.0
  None                                            91.3                     44.3

a
  For some variables, missing values reduce the sample size. Percentages are reported for ordinal variables, and mean values (usually
mean percentages) are presented for numerical variables. The transitions from percentages to means are shown at various points in
the tables.
b
  The test of statistical significance is Pearson’s w2 for ordinal data, and the Mann – Whitney test for numerical data.
c
  Gamma is presented for ordinal variables, and the effect size (difference between means divided by the pooled standard deviation)
for numerical variables. Both statistics measure the magnitude of the change in the variable.

managers responded to the project by improving                          out’ or ‘chatting up’ activities by men (and to a lesser
facilities, but these measures were overwhelmed to                      extent women) increased in frequency [terms such as
some extent by the increase in patronage. Despite the                   ‘heavy necking’ or ‘flagrant fondling by females’ were
greater numbers, there appeared to be more ‘wandering                   coined by the students who developed the original
about’ and ‘table-hopping’ by patrons, but without any                  observation schedule in the Sydney research. They
increase in bumping or shoving. There were few                          have stood the test of time as reliable ways of
changes in entertainment and recreation. Generally                      assessing patron sexual activity in diverse settings,
food was more available—an important change in the                      and are not meant to be pejorative or reflect value
context of a move to responsible serving practices—but                  judgements]. Sexual competition also declined, redu-
it was still only visible in two-thirds of visits in 1996.              cing the intensity of one possible factor in aggressive
   Most patrons appeared to be ‘regulars’ or were ‘out                  and violent incidents [2]. Consistent with a less
for a big night’, and there was an increase in these                    permissive environment was the trend to lower levels
categories in 1996. Individual ‘cheerfulness’ and                       of rowdiness, swearing and ‘group territoriality’
‘friendliness’ were also rated as mainly medium or                      among both men and women.
high in both years for men and women, although it
seems that women especially were enjoying them-
selves more in 1996. The ‘decorum expectations of                       Patron characteristics. There were few changes, despite
management’ increased markedly, with improvements                       increases in numbers and in crowding. ID checks
particularly apparent in sexual activities and in                       reduced patrons of high school age, but for some reason
negative interchanges between patrons. The most                         Pacific Islanders also reduced in number (from 4.3% to
overt sexual behaviours (such as ‘heavy necking’ and                    1.9% of patrons). There were declines in both small
‘flagrant fondling’—by males or females) became                         and large crowds, but an increase in patrons on their
much less common, but the more flirtatious ‘checking                    own.
24     Ross Homel et al.

Table 2. Selected statistically significant changes in the social environment of venues in the three cities combined, 1994 and 1996 (p 5 0.05)

                                               1994 (n = 83) %         1996 (n = 116) %                                      Gamma or
Variable                                          or meana                or meana                       pb                  effect sizec

Overall comfort                                                                                      0.009                       0.03
  High (very comfortable)                             25.7                     14.8
  Medium (moderate comfort)                           51.4                     69.6
  Low (little comfort)                                14.9                     14.8
  None (uncomfortable)                                 8.1                      0.9
Bar crowding                                                                                         0.01                        0.09
  High                                                21.6                     21.7
  Medium                                              28.4                     42.6
  Low                                                 40.5                     20.0
  None                                                 9.5                     15.7
Table-hopping                                                                                        0.04                        0.34
  Yes                                                 20.7                     34.5
  No                                                  79.3                     65.5
Band as entertainment/recreation                                                                     0.01                        0.38
  Yes                                                 24.1                     41.4
  No                                                  75.9                     58.6
Heavy metal music present                                                                            0.004                       0.64
  Yes                                                  4.8                     19.0
  No                                                  95.2                     81.0
Food—small snacks                                                                                    0.00009                     0.54
  Yes                                                 24.1                     51.7
  No                                                  75.9                     48.3
Food—hot snacks                                                                                      0.04                        0.48
  Yes                                                  6.0                     15.5
  No                                                  94.0                     84.5
Decorum expectations of management                                                                   0.00004                     0.53
  High                                                 6.8                     56.5
  Moderate                                            35.6                     56.5
  Permissive                                          38.4                     22.6
  Very permissive                                     19.2                      3.5
No sexual activity by males                                                                          0.02                        0.45
  Yes                                                 10.8                     24.1
  No                                                  89.2                     75.9
Checking out behaviour by males                                                                      0.009                       0.38
  Yes                                                 55.4                     73.3
  No                                                  44.6                     26.7
Heavy necking, touching by males                                                                     0.004                       0.44
  Yes                                                 36.1                     18.1
  No                                                  63.9                     81.9
No sexual activity by females                                                                        0.0005                      0.56
  Yes                                                 13.3                     35.3
  No                                                  86.7                     64.7
Heavy necking, touching by females                                                                   0.0008                      0.52
  Yes                                                 34.9                     14.7
  No                                                  65.1                     85.3
Flagrant fondling by females                                                                         0.003                       0.60
  Yes                                                 18.1                      5.2
  No                                                  81.9                     94.8
Individual ‘cheerfulness’ of females                                                                 0.03                        0.36
  High                                                28.4                     48.2
  Medium                                              55.4                     43.0
  Low                                                 14.9                      7.0
  None                                                 1.4                      1.8
Social ‘friendliness’ of females                                                                     0.007                       0.39
  High                                                16.2                     40.2
  Medium                                              62.2                     44.7
  Low                                                 18.9                     13.2
  None                                                 2.7                      1.8

                                                                                                                         (continued overleaf )
Making licensed venues safer for patrons    25

                                                       Table 2.   (continued )

                                            1994 (n = 83) %        1996 (n = 116) %                                    Gamma or
Variable                                       or meana               or meana                    pb                   effect sizec

Swearing females                                                                               0.02                         0.38
  High                                            12.2                     3.5
  Medium                                          16.2                     8.8
  Low                                             29.7                    28.9
  None                                            41.9                    58.8
Swearing males                                                                                 0.008                        0.35
  High                                            17.6                     5.3
  Medium                                          27.0                    17.5
  Low                                             27.0                    34.2
  None                                            28.4                    43.0

a
  For some variables, missing values reduce the sample size. Percentages are reported for ordinal variables, and mean values (usually
mean percentages) are presented for numerical variables. The transitions from percentages to means are shown at various points in
the tables.
b
  The test of statistical significance is Pearson’s w2 for ordinal data, and the Mann – Whitney test for numerical data.
c
  Gamma is presented for ordinal variables, and the effect size (difference between means divided by the pooled standard deviation)
for numerical variables. Both statistics measure the magnitude of the change in the variable.

Bar staff. Bar staff became much friendlier (‘friendly’              noted in about a quarter of all visits, with only a small
rating: 44.6 – 67.2%; ‘hostile and rude’ rating: 6.8 –               reduction between 1994 and 1996.
0.9%), they were better matched with patrons in
terms of gender ratios, and were more likely to be
dressed in the house uniform (43.2 – 61.9%). Identi-                 Host responsibility (Table 3). Methods for dealing with
fication with explicit house policies and the Code of                intoxicated people improved, with intervention by staff
Practice, symbolized by the use of uniforms, may                     in at least some cases rising from 30.4% to 53.3%.
have assisted in the move to less permissive practices               Techniques that showed statistically significant changes
with respect to deviant patron behaviour, although                   included delaying service, offering alternatives, denying
the need to deal with such behaviour apparently                      service and calling management. Publicity to patrons
reduced in 1996. However, the need to deal with                      improved, with an increase in the use of underage
aggressive behaviour apparently did not change,                      drinking warnings, Patron Care signs and other forms
being observed in about 19% of visits in both years,                 of publicity. Promotion of consumption also declined:
and nor did the rated abilities of bar staff in this                 topping up or filling empty glasses was not observed at
respect.                                                             all in 1996; ‘happy hours’ nearly halved in frequency;
                                                                     promotion of specific drinks and the use of gimmicks
                                                                     halved. Interventions with intoxicated patrons included
Alcohol and drug consumption (Table 3). Neither male                 refusal of service and asking for age identification (both
nor female drinking rates appeared to decline, and nor               up from 1.8% to 20.0% of relevant incidents), but
did female drunkenness decline significantly, but the                several other possible strategies, such as offering non-
incidence of male drunkenness—particularly at ‘high’                 alcoholic drinks, food or alternative transport were not
levels—reduced sharply. The percentage of visits with                used at all in either year, suggesting that there was still
high levels of male drunkenness declined from 40.2%                  considerable room for improvement.
to 13.8%, while the percentage with low or no male
drunkenness increased from 26.8% to 42.2%. These
                                                                     New analyses of the north Queensland Safety Action data
results imply that staff intervened in a firm way when
serving men, in order to prevent intoxication. Because               Regression techniques were used to identify factors that
of this intervention, high drinking rates were less likely           best explained the declines in aggression and violence
to lead to visible intoxication. Neither cover charges nor           in north Queensland (Fig. 1). The visit was the unit of
the cost of drinks appeared to change. Given the                     analysis (n = 199, 83 in 1994 and 116 in 1996). Results
evidence for moderate increases in patronage between                 from the three sites were similar and were combined.
1994 and 1996, this suggests that the introduction of                The focus was on physical violence (observed in eight
the Code of Practices did not make the establishments                visits in 1994 and two in 1996; p = 0.012) and all forms
any less profitable. Evidence of drug consumption was                of non-physical aggression (23 visits in 1994 and 22 in
26     Ross Homel et al.

Table 3. Selected statistically significant changes in alcohol consumption and host responsibility in venues in the three cities combined, 1994
                                                             and 1996 (p 5 0.05)

                                 1994 (n = 83) %             1996 (n = 116) %                                              Gamma or
Variable                            or meana                    or meana                           pb                      effect sizec

Drunkenness: males                                                                              0.0004                         0.38
  High                                      40.2                         13.8
  Medium                                    32.9                         44.0
  Low                                       18.3                         31.0
  None                                       8.5                         11.2
Types of drinks
  consumed: males
  % Beer                           mean = 54.9                  mean = 47.4                     0.05                           0.30
  % Light beer                             1.0                          4.8                     0.0007                         0.54
  % Soft drinks                            0.5                          3.0                     0.0009                         0.46
  % Water                                  0.4                          2.9                     0.0008                         0.39
Publicity to clientele                                                                          0.001                          0.45
Under-age drinking
  warning
  Yes                                       28.9                         51.7
  No                                        71.1                         48.3
Publicity to clientele                                                                          0.02                           0.37
House policy notice
  Yes                                       32.5                         18.1
  No                                        67.5                         81.9
Promotion of                                                                                    0.003                          1.0
  consumption
Top up/replace or fill
  empty glasses
  Yes                                        7.2                         0
  No                                        92.8                       100
Promotion of                                                                                    0.02                           0.38
  consumption
Gimmicks
  Yes                                       27.7                         14.7
  No                                        72.3                         85.3
Staff intervention with                                                                         0.0001                         0.27
  highly intoxicated
  patrons
  In every case                              1.2                          5.6
  Sometimes                                 19.3                         16.7
  No intervention                           47.0                         19.4
  No highly intoxicated                     32.5                         58.3
     patrons
Nature of intervention
Refusal of service                                                                              0.002                          0.86
  Yes                                        1.8                         20.0
  No                                        98.2                         80.0
Response to intoxicated
  and ordering Patrons
Appropriate service                                                                             0.01                           0.43
  Yes                                       47.4                         72.1
  Sometimes                                 17.1                          8.8
  No                                        35.5                         19.1
Service delay                                                                                   0.0001                         0.71
  Yes                                        5.6                         16.7
  Sometimes                                  2.8                         22.7
  No                                        91.7                         60.6
Offer of an alternative                                                                         0.02                           1.0
  Yes                                       0.0                           6.7
  Sometimes                                 0.0                           3.3
  No                                      100.0                          90.0

                                                                                                                          (continued overleaf )
Making licensed venues safer for patrons   27

                                                       Table 3.   (continued )

                              1994 (n = 83) %            1996 (n = 116) %                                            Gamma or
Variable                         or meana                   or meana                        pb                       effect sizec

Service denied                                                                            0.0002                         0.90
  Yes                                     1.4                        7.5
  Sometimes                               0.0                       16.4
  No                                     98.6                       76.1
Management called                                                                         0.04                            .65
  Yes                                     2.7                        4.8
  Sometimes                               0.0                        7.9
  No                                     97.3                       87.3

a
  For some variables, missing values reduce the sample size. Percentages are reported for ordinal variables, and mean values (usually
mean percentages) are presented for numerical variables. The transitions from percentages to means are shown at various points in
the tables.
b
  The test of statistical significance is Pearson’s w2 for ordinal data, and the Mann – Whitney test for numerical data.
c
  Gamma is presented for ordinal variables, and the effect size (difference between means divided by the pooled standard deviation)
for numerical variables. Both statistics measure the magnitude of the change in the variable.

1996; p = 0.048). Logistic regressions were used for the             variables is shown in Table 4, although virtually any
physical violence data and ordinary least squares for                subset of at least two variables would suffice to ‘explain’
non-physical aggression (total incidents per visit of                the year effect. It is also necessary to keep in mind that
arguments, challenges or threats and verbal abuse).                  with only 10 visits in which physical violence was
Repeated-measures techniques were not appropriate, as                recorded, fitting a model with six predictors entails a
many venues changed radically through refurbishments                 high degree of statistical instability, so that relatively
or extensions in the 2-year period, a few closed down                little weight should be placed on specific p-values or
and many others opened up.                                           regression coefficients.
   The first step was to test, one by one, all environ-                  For reduced aggression, 25 key predictors at the first
mental factors that changed over time for their capacity             stage were identified, many more than for assaults,
to make the year effect for violence or aggression non-              reflecting the more frequent occurrence of non-physical
significant. Thus each factor that showed a statistically            aggression. Forward stepwise regression was used to
significant change was fitted as a covariate, followed by            identify the subset most strongly related to aggression,
year. The dependent variable was either violence                     and these were then fitted as covariates, with year
(1 = one or more incidents; 0 = no incidents) or                     added. Results are shown in Table 5.
aggression (ranging from 0 to 6 incidents per visit). A                  How should the ‘calling management with intoxi-
large number of tests were conducted in this stage,                  cated and ordering patrons’ be interpreted? Other
especially because many variables had missing values                 analyses suggest that the predictive power of this
and various recodings were tried to maintain a sample                variable reflects having to deal with intoxicated patrons
size close to 199 (including the creation of nominal                 as opposed to having few drunks on the premises, but
scales with a missing values category). The second step              none of the measures of actual intoxication worked as
involved putting the surprisingly small number of                    well as calling management. In other words, the
candidates from the first step together in a regression              variable is a surrogate for the number of intoxicated
model (with year), in order to arrive at a minimal subset            patrons. The lack of chairs with armrests seems to be
of factors that thoroughly explained (in a statistical               serving as an indicator of the importance of comfortable
sense) the declines in aggression and violence.                      places to sit, so taps into the general dimension of
   For reduced physical violence, four key predictors at             comfort. The most critical thing to note is that year
the first stage were identified. These were overall                  became clearly non-significant when the four patron
comfort (p = 0.050 for year, adjusted); availability of              and environmental factors were fitted first. As with
public transport (p = 0.058 for year, adjusted); ‘flagrant           assaults, two or more of these factors was sufficient to
fondling by females’ (p = 0.065 for year, adjusted); and             statistically explain the year effect. It is also important
level of male drunkenness (p = 0.058 for year, ad-                   to note that, not surprisingly, aggression was a strong
justed). Interestingly, none of these factors was                    predictor of assaults (r = 0.53), and that if aggression is
individually decisive. However, various combinations                 fitted as a covariate with assaults as dependent variable,
of these four variables clearly ‘washed out’ the year                the p-value for year drops to 0.071. This suggests that
effect in the second stage. The model with all four                  assaults could be reduced by directly focusing on the
28       Ross Homel et al.

predictors in Table 4, or indirectly by focusing on the                      calling management is necessary. Thus the analysis
predictors in Table 5.                                                       helps to sharpen the focus of programmes designed to
                                                                             modify alcohol consumption: whatever controls are
                                                                             desired on overall levels of consumption, it is essential
Discussion
                                                                             that the number of very drunk and troublesome males
Although very many features of the social and physical                       be kept to a minimum.
environments of licensed venues changed after the                               The civilizing impact of physical comfort is consis-
intervention, the regression analyses suggest that a                         tent with the early qualitative research conducted in
relatively small number of factors operating across                          Sydney [3]. However, not all indicators of comfort
disparate domains might be critical to reductions in the                     moved in a consistent direction (see Tables 1 and 2),
rates of aggression and violence. These factors include                      with evidence of deterioration in some respects. This
the serving and consumption of alcohol, physical                             perhaps reflected a conflict between increased patron-
comfort, the degree of overall ‘permissiveness’ in the                       age and venue comfort. Nevertheless, the importance of
establishment, the availability of public transport, and                     comfortable seating being available was clear, a
aspects of ‘the ethnic mix’ of patrons. It is noteworthy                     conclusion that will come as no surprise to those who
that these factors are similar to those identified as                        have spent many hours in clubs and hotels.
correlates of aggression in previous studies over a 20-                         Patron behaviour, in the form of overt expressions of
year period in Canada and Australia [2,10,11,13]. This                       sexual activity and high levels of swearing by men, seem
suggests that the findings are not restricted in their                       to reflect a generally permissive environment. The link
relevance to one place or time period.                                       between permissiveness and violence makes a lot of
   The regression analyses are consistent with our                           intuitive sense, since if management have an ‘anything
hypothesis that if one concentrated only on the control                      goes’ attitude it is not surprising that violence and
of drinking, reductions in aggression and violence                           aggression occur. It is noteworthy that venues improved
would not be as great as could be achieved if a more                         greatly in these respects after the intervention, and that
holistic approach were adopted. Key aspects of drinking                      casual, non-offensive sexual activity increased substan-
patterns seem to be high levels of male drunkenness                          tially, together with overall levels of friendliness and
and intoxicated patrons causing so much trouble that                         cheerfulness, especially as expressed by women. Venues

               Table 4. Logistic regression model of critical environmental factors explaining the year effect for physical violence

                                                                                              Standard
Variable                                                                       B                error                df                  p

Comfort                                                                                                              2                 0.054
Very, moderately comfortable (relative to missing value)a                   7 2.51               1.12                1                 0.025
Little or no comfort (relative to missing value)a                           7 1.23               1.23                1                 0.320
Male drunkenness (1 = high; 2 = medium; 3 = low; 4 = none)                  7 0.85               0.55                1                 0.429
Flagrant female fondling (1 = yes; 2 = no)                                  7 1.95               0.92                1                 0.033
Public transport available (1 = yes; 2 = no)                                  1.36               1.10                1                 0.215
Year (1 = 1994; 2 = 1996)                                                   7 0.10               0.49                1                 0.839
Constant                                                                    197.40             971.74                1                 0.839

a
    These variables were dummy coded.

     Table 5. Ordinary least squares regression model of critical environmental factors explaining the year effect for non-physical aggression

Variable                                                                   B                    t                 Beta                  p

Percentage of Pacific Islander patrons (0 – 30%)                          4.94                3.72                 0.26                0.000
Male swearing (1 = high; 2 = medium; 3 = low; 4 = none)                 7 0.21              7 3.15               7 0.22                0.002
Call management with intoxicated and ordering patrons                   7 0.43              7 2.34               7 0.16                0.020
  (1 = yes; 2 = sometimes; 3 = no/missing)
Chairs with armrests (1 = yes; 2 = no/missing)                            0.30                2.21                 0.15                0.029
Year (1 = 1994; 2 = 1996)                                               7 0.02              7 0.28               7 0.02                0.784
Constant                                                                 39.59                0.29                                     0.775
Making licensed venues safer for patrons   29

seem to have become more civil and certainly more            Police Service: National Campaign Against Drug
female-friendly, with consequent benefits for safety.        Abuse Law Enforcement Fund, and by the Criminol-
Importantly, these processes do not simply reflect the       ogy Research Council.
effects of alcohol or drunkenness, as they had indepen-
dent effects in explaining reductions in aggression.
                                                             References
   The availability of public transport also makes a great
deal of sense, given the number of incidents we have          [1] Babor T, Caetano A, Casswell S et al. No ordinary
                                                                  commodity: alcohol and public policy. Oxford: Oxford
witnessed in the streets and on taxi ranks involving
                                                                  University Press, 2003.
patrons trying to find a way home in the early hours of       [2] Graham K, Homel R. Creating safer bars. In: Plant M,
the morning. In the north Queensland cities the ready             Single E, Stockwell T, eds. Alcohol: minimizing the harm.
availability of public transport leaped from 1.4% of              London: Free Association Press, 1997:171 – 92.
visits in 1994 to 21.7% in 1996 although transport            [3] Homel R, Tomsen S, Thommeny J. Public drinking and
                                                                  violence: not just an alcohol problem. J Drug Issues
provided by venues themselves did not improve at all,
                                                                  1992;22:679 – 97.
highlighting the importance of involving local autho-         [4] Power M. The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford:
rities and communities in these interventions.                    Oxford University Press, 1997.
   A puzzling outcome of the regression analyses was          [5] Stockwell T, ed. Alcohol misuse and violence: an examina-
the finding that reducing the percentage of Pacific               tion of the appropriateness and efficacy of liquor licensing
                                                                  laws across Australia. Report no. 5. Canberra: Common-
Islander patrons was important in explaining the                  wealth of Australia, 1994.
reduction in non-physical aggression. This issue is           [6] Hauritz M, Homel R, McIlwain G, Burrows T, Townsley
more fully discussed by Homel & Clarke [10] in an                 M. Reducing violence in licensed venues through commu-
analysis of data from Sydney licensed venues where                nity safety action projects: the Queensland experience.
exactly the same relationship was observed. The                   Contemp Drug Problems 1998;25:511 – 51.
                                                              [7] Homel R. Review of T. Stockwell, ed. An examination of
phenomenon does appear to be real and may reflect                 the appropriateness and efficacy of liquor-licensing laws
culturally approved behavioural strategies for dealing            across Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Printing
with conflict. This hypothesis requires more research.            Service. Addiction 1996;91:1231 – 3.
   It would not be wise to use the results of these           [8] Homel R, McIlwain G, Carvolth R. Creating safer drinking
analyses as an infallible guide to regulatory practice.           environments. In: Heather N, Peters TJ, Stockwell T, eds.
                                                                  International handbook of alcohol dependence and pro-
Incidents of aggression and violence are (fortunately)            blems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2001:721 – 40.
relatively rare, and the statistical models must therefore    [9] Hauritz M, Homel R, Townsley M, Burrows T, McIlwain
work within a circumscribed predictive space. More-               G. An evaluation of the Local Government Safety Action
over, although the analysis of concomitant changes in             Projects in Cairns, Townsville and Mackay: a report to the
indicators of environmental and behavioural processes             Queensland Department of Health, the Queensland Police
                                                                  Service and the Criminology Research Council. Brisbane:
is an improvement on analyses of data collected at a              Centre for Crime Policy and Public Safety, Griffith
single time, such a strategy still falls short of experi-         University, 1998.
mental designs in probative value. Indeed, a sensible        [10] Homel R, Clark J. The prediction and prevention of
research strategy would be to now devise a series of              violence in pubs and clubs. Crime Prevention Studies 3.
experiments based on the findings of this paper,                  Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1994:1 – 46.
                                                             [11] Homel R, Hauritz M, Wortley R, McIlwain G, Carvolth R.
probing the power of improved comfort, reduced                    Preventing alcohol-related crime through community ac-
permissiveness and so on, to effect improvements in               tion: the Surfers Paradise Safety Action project. In: Homel
patron safety.                                                    R, ed. Policing for Prevention: Reducing Crime, Public
   Such experiments would require the active co-                  Intoxication, and Injury. Crime Prevention Studies 7.
operation of licensees and perhaps of the regulatory              Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1997:35 – 90.
                                                             [12] Ayres I, Braithwaite J. Responsive regulation: transcending
authorities, but would be a useful tool for strengthening         the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University
the ecological and systems approach that we and others            Press, 1992.
advocate (e.g. [15]). The trick is to mobilize resources     [13] Graham K, LaRocque L, Yetman R, Ross TJ, Guistra E.
at the three levels of the responsive regulatory model            Aggression and barroom environments. J Stud Alcohol
while maintaining a sharp focus on the problem as it              1980;41:277 – 92.
                                                             [14] Lincoln R, Homel R. Alcohol and youthful rites of passage.
actually is, not as we imagine it to be.                          In: Williams P, ed. Alcohol, young persons and violence.
                                                                  Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 2001:47 –
                                                                  60.
                                                             [15] Holder HD. Alcohol and the Community: a Systems
Acknowledgements                                                  Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
The research in this report was supported by the
Queensland Department of Health and the Queensland
Drug and Alcohol Review
              CDAR                            Typeset by Elite Typesetting for

                                                                                                                                 D
Manuscript No.

                                                                                                                            S LT
                         230104

                                                                                       T YP

                                                                                                                    UE
                                                                                        ES
                                                                                              TT                        Q

                                                                                              E
                                                                                                   IN G            NI
                                                                                                          T EC H
Author
                                                                                       www.elitetypesetting.com

Editor

Master

Publisher

QUERIES:                          to be answered by AUTHOR

  AUTHOR: The following queries have arisen during the editing of your manuscript.
  Please answer the queries by marking the requisite corrections at the appropriate positions
  in the text.

QUERY NO.                           QUERY DETAILS                              QUERY ANSWERED

            No queries
You can also read