Preliminary Analysis On Advanced Technologies For Hydrogen Light-rail Train Application In Sub-urban Non Electrified Routes

Page created by Jimmy Logan
 
CONTINUE READING
Preliminary Analysis On Advanced Technologies For Hydrogen Light-rail Train Application In Sub-urban Non Electrified Routes
National Scientific Seminar SIDT
                                   POLITECNICO DI BARI 14-15.09.2017
University of L’Aquila
        ITALY

                            Preliminary Analysis On Advanced
                         Technologies For Hydrogen Light-rail Train
                          Application In Sub-urban Non Electrified
                                           Routes

                           D’Ovidio G., Carpenito A., Masciovecchio C., Ometto A.
Preliminary Analysis On Advanced Technologies For Hydrogen Light-rail Train Application In Sub-urban Non Electrified Routes
Presentation overview

   Introduction

   System project and objectives

   Hydrogen train overview and technologies

   Models

   Case study

   Conclusions

                                               2
Preliminary Analysis On Advanced Technologies For Hydrogen Light-rail Train Application In Sub-urban Non Electrified Routes
Italian railway network
     Railway network categories:
                                                                   Operating railway
 a) Fundamental lines: 6,367 km (36.8%)

 b) Complementary lines: 9,466 km (57.5%)

 c) Node lines: 955 km (5.7%)

  Non electrified lines: 4,765 km

  Single track: 4,688 km

The business case for electrification is almost
always unfavorable

 Diesel-powered trains are generally used in
 the complementary lines
                                                        Complementary lines
                                                  represents a considerable and
The Italian diesel rolling stock has a            highly distributed infrastructure
considerable age; the most recent versions         in the national territory able to
are EURO 3 certified                                connect both small-medium
                                                  regional centers and inter/sub-
                                                            urban areas.

                                                                                 3
Preliminary Analysis On Advanced Technologies For Hydrogen Light-rail Train Application In Sub-urban Non Electrified Routes
Objectives

The aims of this study are:

 To design a sustainable rail urban mobility by using trains with «zero» emission
  energy cycle without the use of chemical batteries for traction

 To perform a preliminary feasibility system analysis of a hydrogen powered light-
  rail train able to operate without emissions along a current non-electrified
  “complementary” line category

                                                             4
Preliminary Analysis On Advanced Technologies For Hydrogen Light-rail Train Application In Sub-urban Non Electrified Routes
State of art of the hydrogen trains
Hydrogen fuel combined with fuel cell (FC) technology has become very attractive for
emission free traction systems and has opened up new opportunities in railway
passenger transport.
Internationally much research work, tests and successful services experiences have
been carried out in order to use hydrogen power via onboard FC for different rail
applications.

 a) Urban service application
                                      A first hydrogen powered three-cars tram (380 passengers of carrying
                                      capacity) with electrical traction drives was tested and built by the
                                      Chinese company Sifang (a subsidiary of China South Rail Corporation)

                                      In 2015 seven hydrogen FC trams entered passenger service on an
                                      8.8 km line in Qingdao

 Internet source: Sifang Company

 b) Regional service application

                                      A train powered by hydrogen FC hybridized with batteries has been
                                      designed and tested by Alstom in Germany
 Internet source: Alstom Company

                                                                              5
Light hybrid electric train overview
                         Hybrid Power Unit

                                  Fig. 1 Train power and control configuration

The proposed system architecture consists of a novel Light Hybrid Electric Train with two side rail cars
and a towed coach.
Each rail car uses an electrical traction motor (EM) fed through a hybrid power unit consisting of a hydrogen
FC connected to a set of counter rotating FESS (Flywheel Energy Storage System)

 The motors (EM) operate as generators when control sets a negative acceleration of train

 The FESS are used to store the FC power (when no traction is required) and to recover the braking
  energy in order to feed it back into the vehicle’s power system when it is required

                                                                                 6
Hydrogen fuel cell technology
An FC is an electrochemical device that directly converts the fuel chemical potential energy into electric
energy by combining hydrogen and oxygen (from air) with a catalyst to form water and heat. Single cells
are assembled in a stack whose power output depends on its size.
Increasing the number of cells in a stack increases the voltage, while increasing the surface area of the
cells increases the maximum current

                                                 Features
                           High efficiency of constant electric power output
                           Wide energy output (depending on H2 vessel)
                           No CO2 emission or chemical pollution

                                   Experimental Efficiency diagram of PEM

                                                                                7
Flywheel Energy Storage System Technology
    An electric motor generator is connected to the flywheel allowing DC energy to be stored or recovered.
    The electrical power is used to spin up the flywheel and when the power is turned off the flywheel continues
    to spin. To recover the kinetic power, the motor generator is used to generate electricity thereby slowing down
    the flywheel.
    Rotating at up to 80,000 rpm the very small flywheel can store enough energy to make a significant impact on
    vehicle performance and emissions.

                                             Usable Kinetic Energy

Features:                                                             Current application fields:
•    High power density                                               •   UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply)
•    Light weight and small size                                      •   Bus power buffer, tram, car, racing
•    Long cycle life                                                  •   Train station, power quality
•    No degradation over time                                         •   Military
•    Truly green solution                                             •   Space
•     High efficiency storage and recovery                            •   Active stabilization of boats
                                                                      •   Micro grid stabilization
System dynamic model
A proper control logic block has been defined and used for calculating the power that the
train must produce to meet the drive cycle requirements

      Train

      Path

                            1                  2               3             4              5
Drive Cycle

                                              Fig. 1 Block diagram of dynamic model

 1.     The hybrid power unit (HPU) feeds power to the motors according to their own physical limits and losses. The motors
        provide torque to the wheels as a function of the available power.

 2.     The acceleration and the speed of the train are managed by the controller to meet the requirements of the route cycle
        at best. The power need and the speed actually achieved by the train are determined.
                                                                                                9
Case study
The existing non-electrified single track railway section (23.6 km long with four stations) in the sub-urban
territory of L’Aquila city was considered; it is a part of the line that connects L’Aquila to the cities of Rieti
(at West) and Sulmona (at East). Currently it is served by diesel trains at very low average frequency (1
train per hour).
                                                                   The line section has been redesigned for urban use
                                                                   by introducing seven new stations in addition to the
                                                                   four existing ones

                                        Fig. 1 Urban drive cycle

                                                                    The corresponding driving cycle model was theoretically
                                                                    carried out by taking into account :
                                                                    - max speed: 22 m/s;
                                                                    - max accel/decel.: 0.6 m/s2,
                                                                    - stopping time at stations: 60 s

                                                                                        10
Design inputs and results

  Input data of the LHE Train

                       Unit
Number of wagons         -       3
Number of rail cars      -       2
 Carrying capacity       -     215
        Tare             t      58
   Gross mass            t    73.05           Design results of the hybrid power unit components
    Axle mass            t     9.2
                                                                                    Unit
        Wide            m      2.65
       Length           m     37.61                              Rotor mass           kg       27.72
    Front Area          m2     9.8                               Rotor radius         m        0.13
  Drag coefficient       -     0.45                         Rotor inertial moment    kgm2       0.36
 Max motor power       kW      400
Max motor torque       Nm     1600               FESS         Charge/discharge
                                                                                      -          0.9
   Efficiency of                                        8        efficiency
      traction          -     0.965
 motor/generator                                                 Rotor speed         rpm    15,000-60,000
   Transmission
                        -     0.93
     efficiency                                             Kinetic energy storage    MJ        6.66
Transmission ratio      -      4.8
                                                                 Peak power           kW        67.5
 Rotational mass
                        -     1.18                                Efficiency           -         0.6
                                                 FC

inertial coefficient                                    2
  Radius of wheel       m     0.425                                Power              kW        110

                                                                                     11
Simulation results
                      Power profiles of fuel cell, FESS and motors

   The downsized FC provides the constant power of 210 kW
   The FESS group handles the transient loads by storing or releasing power
   When the motor power request is zero, the FC first recharges the FESS and than the battery
                                                                         12
Simulation results
        Energy profiles of FC , FESS , traction motors and regenerative braking

   The energy needed to complete the full route cycle is 358 MJ of which 98 are provided by
    the FESS group.
   The FESS group recovers, through the regenerative braking, about 21 % of the total energy
    needed for traction
                                                                        13
Simulation results

  Train speed and acceleration actually reached,
 compared to the ones imposed by the drive cycle

 A good approximation has been achieved

                                              14
Fuel consumption
                               Hydrogen consumption of the vehicle
                                                                                             Train fuel consumption:
              Ee         Ee is the electrical energy of FC
  mH 2                                                                                        6.3 KgH2/drive cycle
            fc  H i    ηfc is the FC efficiency
                                                                                                 1.24gH2/pass/km
                         Hi is the lower heating value of hydrogen (119,9 MJ/kg)

                                 Emission comparison
                             A diesel train with three cars has been considered.
                         An average fuel consumption of 1.83 kg/km with CO2 emission
                                           factor of 3.175 kg/kgdiesel has been estimated

                  LHE Train                                     Diesel train
73.5 t of mass, 219 passengers of carrying      110 t of mass, 286 passengers of carrying
       capacity and 2x400 kW power                     capacity and 2x560 kW power

           0.34 t/pass. & 10,9 kW/t                       0.38 t/pass. & 10,2 kW/t

         H2                CO2 emission                Diesel fuel          CO2 emission
  gH2/passenger/km       gCO2/passenger km       gdiesel/passenger/ km    gCO2/passenger/km

          1.24                    -                      6.4                    20.31        If H2 is produced by renewable
                                                                                            energy, the emission saving refers
                                                                                                    the full energy cycle
                                                                                            15
Conclusions

   A preliminary feasibility analysis of a hydrogen powered light-rail train to operate
    without emissions along the current non-electrified “complementary” lines category
    has been presented

   The main components of system have been technologically defined and successfully
    designed

   «Zero» emission energy cycle has been achieved without the use of
    electrochemical batteries for traction

   The hydrogen train has been simulated for running over a driving cycle
    corresponding to a redesigned existing complementary line section (23,6 km long)
    in the sub-urban territory of L’Aquila city.

   The comparison between light hybrid electric train and diesel train has highlighted
    that the hydrogen power train solution allows a 20.31 gCO2/passenger km
    emission to be saved

                                                                16
You can also read