Velkommen til GF 2022 kick-off - november 2021 - Computershare
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Velkommen til
GF 2022 kick-off
12. november 2021
1 Computershare Public
Program
Kl. 13.00 13.30
Velkommen Panel: Dirigentens rolle på den elektroniske
generalforsamling
Michael Kjøller-Petersen
Adm. direktør, Computershare Pernille Høstrup Dalhoff
Director, Attorney, Kromann Reumert
Kl. 13.10
Erfaringer fra de danske generalforsamlinger Anders Ørjan Jensen
i 2020 og 2021 Partner, Gorrissen Federspiel
Søren Kirkeby Andersen
Head of Client Management,
Computershare Thomas Holst Laursen
Attorney-at-Law, Partner, Plesner
14.10
Pause med forfriskninger
Program
Kl. 14.30 Kl. 15.10
Panel: Selskabernes erfaringer med elektroniske How to handle the ’E’ and ’S’ in ESG
generalforsamlinger
Domenic Brancati
Lise Ladegaard von Rosen Global Chief Operating Officer, Georgeson
Head of Group Legal Capital Markets
and M&A, GN Store Nord
Kl. 15.30
Præsentation af Computershares nye løsning til
Peter Ring elektroniske generalforsamlinger
VP, General Counsel, Pandora
Amina Skjødt
VGM Specialist & Project Manager,
Susanne O’Neill Computershare
Paralegal, Bavarian Nordic
Kl. 15.50
Q&A og key take-aways
Jakob Knudsen Kl. 16.00
CEO, ViroGates Tak for i dag!
Generalforsamlingerne - forår 2022
Under hvilke forhold vil selskabets møde med aktionærerne blive afholdt det kommende år?
1
Vækst i
Fokus på
COVID-19 antal SRD 2
aktionærer
ESG
2
2.500+ elektroniske generalforsamlinger på globalt plan
Danmark: GF-sæsonen 2020/21
50+ elektroniske
generalforsamlinger 652
45
631
568
597
24
Erfaringer fra de danske
generalforsamlinger i
2020 og 2021
Søren Kirkeby Andersen
Head of Client Management
6 Computershare Public
Vedtægtsændringer til afholdelse af elektronisk GF 23 af C25-selskaberne har vedtægtshjemmel Fuldstændig elektronisk generalforsamling i 2021 uden vedtægtshjemmel Frem til den 31. december 2021 er det muligt at afholde fuldstændig elektronisk generalforsamling uden adgang til fysisk fremmøde som en direkte eller indirekte konsekvens af COVID-19, selvom dette ikke er optaget i selskabets vedtægter. › Før GF-sæsonen 2020/21 havde to C25-selskaber bemyndigelse til afholdelse af fuldstændig elektronisk generalforsamling › I dag har 23 af C25-selskaberne bemyndigelse i vedtægterne til afholdelse af fuldstændig elektronisk generalforsamling. Delvis elektronisk generalforsamling Selskaber der har vedtægtsgrundet, at generalforsamlingen skal afholdes som en fysisk generalforsamling, har mulighed for at afholde en delvis elektronisk generalforsamling. 7 Computershare Public
Generalforsamlinger under COVID-19
Hver tredje generalforsamling i 2021 var fuldstændig elektronisk
GF-sæsonen 2020
› Mange generalforsamlinger udsat (herunder hver femte Large Cap)
Generalforsamlinger 2021
› Alle C25-selskaber afviklede GF fysisk med få eller ingen
fremmødte - undtagen Bavarian Nordic, der afviklede en
fuldstændig elektronisk generalforsamling.
Fuldstændig
GF-sæsonen 2021 elektronisk
32%
› Selskaberne var forberedt på begrænsninger for fysisk afholdelse.
› Stor interesse for elektroniske generalforsamlinger blandt danske
selskaber - men ukendt territorie.
› Lempede krav for afvikling af generalforsamlinger under Fysisk
pandemien og samtidig imødekomme governance-krav i størst 63%
muligt omfang. Delvis
elektronsk
› Modstand fra investorer og proxy-rådgivere i forbindelse med 5%
elektroniske generalforsamlinger er aftaget i lyset af COVID-19-
pandemien.
Nødvendighed eller ‘New normal’?
8 Computershare Public
Statistik på delvis og fuld elektroniske generalforsamlinger
Danmark: Marts 2020 - November 2021 (65 møder)
11 113 510 1 70 294
min max min max
gns gns
Tilmeldte Deltagere
0 1,6 11 0 4,2 43
min max min max
gns gns
Afstemninger Spørgsmål
9 Computershare Public
Aktionærforslag 2021
Stort fald i antallet af aktionærforslag på C25-generalforsamlingerne
11 aktionærforslag fremsat i 9 selskaber Aktionærforslag - C25
› Carlsberg 30
› Chr. Hansen
› Coloplast 25
› Danske Bank
› DSV 20
› FLSmidth & Co.
› GN Store Nord 15
› Novo Nordisk
› Rockwool International 10
5
6 aktionærforslag vedtaget
Vedtagelse af 6 aktionærforslag fremsat af
0
AkademikerPension og LD Fonde: 2019 2020 2021
› Carlsberg, Chr. Hansen, Coloplast, DSV, FLSmidth &
Co. og GN Store Nord.
10 Computershare PublicElektroniske vs. fysiske generalforsamlinger Sæt tid af til forberedelsen Varighed › Elektroniske generalforsamlinger er i gennemsnit lidt kortere end fysiske: 1,5 time. Aktionærernes taleret › Online chatfunktion › Skriftlige indlæg forud for GF (aktionærindlæg oplæst af selskabet – fx A.P. Møller - Mærsk ”Aktionærernes Stemme”) › Øvrigt: Live telefon-hotline, videoindlæg. Afstemning › Hurtig afvikling af afstemninger › Mulighed for afstemning på alle dagsordenspunkter › Øget transparens 11 Computershare Public
Gode råd til forberedelse af elektroniske generalforsamlinger
Forberedelse er afgørende. No one size fits all.
Planlægning er afgørende Aktionærkommunikationen Risikostyring – hav en plan B klar
› Start forberedelserne i god tid. › Gør det klar og tydeligt for › Vælg samarbejdspartnere der har
› Involver alle aktører (dirigent, aktionærerne, hvordan de deltager, ekspertise inden for elektroniske
moderator, Computershare, AV- stiller spørgsmål via Q&A, deltager i møder og drøft de tekniske løsninger
leverandør m.fl.) afstemning osv. i god tid.
› Tag stilling til lokation. › Link til Computershares praktiske › Hav en plan B klar, hvis fx en fysisk
guide. GF skal konverteres til en elektronisk
› Eventuel optagelse af formandens pga. forsamlingsforbud.
beretning. › Henvis til Computershares
telefonsupport ved tekniske › Vær omstillingsparat.
› Ingen ”One size fits all”! problemer.
Vær opmærksom på teknikken Afhold generalprøve Moderation af Q&A
› Det er vigtigt at drøfte mulighederne › Elektroniske generalforsamlinger › Moderator skal være fortrolig med
for de tekniske løsninger med stiller særlige krav til dirigentens håndteringen af indkomne spørgsmål
leverandørerne i god tid. ledelse af mødet. fra aktionærer.
› Lav en plan for håndtering af › Alle involverede aktører bør deltage i › Tæt samarbejde mellem selskabets
eventuelle tekniske problemer (Wi-fi, generalprøven. moderator og Computershare.
lyd, billede mm.). › Afklar hvem der skal deltage fysisk
på generalforsamlingsdagen.
12 Computershare PublicSRD II – update Er alle dele af aktionærrettighedsdirektivet på plads? 1. Identifikation af aktionærer 2. Investorkommunikation – Golden Operational Record 3. Afgivelse af stemmer og fuldmagt over grænser 1. Identifikation af aktionærer › Selskaber kan få lavet en Investor Disclosure › Depotbanker har pligt til at svare (hurtigt) › Svar er standardiseret gennem alle led Vores erfaringer › Størstedelen af danske banker svarer retur. De sidste er på vej til at være på plads. › Ikke alle bagvedliggende led giver svar. › Værdifuld indsigt i hvem der tager investeringsbeslutningen! 13 Computershare Public
SRD II – update 2. Investorkommunikation - Golden Operational Record › Investorer har krav på at modtage generalforsamlings-indkaldelse og dagsorden rettidigt og i et korrekt og standardiseret format. › Skal oprettes og indtastes hos udstedende bank. › Øjeblikkelig distribution til CSD’er, formidlere m.fl. Vores erfaringer › Udfordring med sprog. › Godt samarbejde med udstedende bank letter processen og minimerer fejl. › Beregn ekstra tid til at klargøre dagsordenen og koordinér offentliggørelse sammen med Computershare og udstedende bank. › Udsendelse af indkaldelse via GOR kan ikke stå alene, da resultatet hos aktionær er meget svingende i kvalitet. 14 Computershare Public
SRD II – update 3. Proxy voting og stemmebekræftelser Navnenoterede aktionærer › Stemmeinstrukser(fuldmagt og brevstemmer) fra navnenoterede aktionærer modtages som hidtil via Aktionærportalen. › Alle aktionærer modtager kvittering på stemmeafgivelse i Aktionærportalen. › Tidligere afgivne stemmer kan søges frem. Udenlandske investorer › Stemmeinstrukser fra udenlandske investorer modtages digitalt via e-mail eller via SRD2 formater › Det er fortsat nødvendigt med PoA i tilknytning til stemmeinstruks, men ændringsforslag på vej fra Erhvervsstyrelsen. 15 Computershare Public
Panel: Dirigentens rolle
på den elektroniske
generalforsamling
Pernille Høstrup Dalhoff, Kromann Reumert
Anders Ørjan Jensen, Gorrissen Federspiel
Thomas Holst Laursen, Plesner
16 Computershare PublicPanel: Selskabernes
erfaringer med elektroniske
generalforsamlinger
Lise Ladegaard von Rosen, Head of Group Legal
Capital Markets and M&A, GN Store Nord
Peter Ring, VP, General Counsel, Pandora
Susanne O’Neill, Paralegal, Bavarian Nordic
Jakob Knudsen, CEO, ViroGates
17 Computershare PublicHow to handle the ’E’
and ’S’ in ESG
Domenic Brancati,
Global Chief Operating Officer,
Georgeson
18 Computershare PublicHOW TO HANDLE THE ’E’ AND ’S’ IN ESG 12-NOVEMBER-2021
WHY IS ESG MORE IMPORTANT NOW?
COP26 (Conference of the parties) › Secure global net zero by mid-century and keep 1.5 degrees within reach › Adapt to protect communities and natural habitats › Mobilise finance - at least $100bn in climate finance per year by 2020 › Work together to deliver
ESG is a Priority For Many Companies
ESG covers a range of risks and opportunities not historically considered in analyzing fundamental financial
performance that are now viewed as materially impacting a company's ability to generate long-term value
ISSUER-SPECIFIC ISSUES TYPICALLY:
SPECIFICS MATTER › Come from core product or operational risk
ESG issues of focus vary › Can meaningfully damage the issuer’s reputation, value or ability
by industry and issuer to operate
› Are topics of media, stakeholder or public policy interest or debateThe Growing, Dynamic ESG Landscape Can Be Confusing
ESG risk assessment methodology
and carbon transition assessments
launched in 2019
Owner
Partially acquired
Acquired ratings
Majority 2019
arm Nov 2019
owner
ESG evaluation
ESG scores that inform
launched in April 2019
FTSE4Good and other indices
Acquired
2016
Partner Launched new ESG risk
rating methodology in 2019
Provides
data Provides
data
Provides
data
Provides
data Align
questionnaires
Provides
data Aligned with TCFD in 2018
New set of ratings and indices
launched in April 2019
Provides
data
Launched R-Factor Standards launched
ESG dashboards that provide methodology in 2019 November 2018
third party data to investors
ESG Relevance Scores Integrating
launched in January 2019
Acquired 2018
Acquired
2018Prominent Disclosure Standards Differ and Big Investors Favor Different Ones
GRI TCFD SASB
GLOBAL REPORTING TASK-FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING
INITIATIVE STANDARDS FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES STANDARDS BOARD
Report consistently and transparently
Report on impacts to economy, Report on industry relevant ESG topics
Purpose on climate-related information that is
environment and people most relevant to enterprise value creation
financially material
Stakeholders Financial stakeholders: investors,
Audience Investors
with varying interests lenders, insurers etc.
Industry agnostic standards with Industry agnostic framework with
Type of Guidance Industry standards
emerging industry guidance “high risk” sector supplements
Material if “omitting, misstating or
Material is (1) significant to a obscuring it could be reasonably
company’s economic, environmental Material is consistent with materiality expected to influence investment or
Approach to
or social impacts, or (2) substantively of other information included in your lending decisions that users make on the
Materiality
influential in assessments and SEC filings basis of their assessments of short-,
decision-making of stakeholders medium-, and long-term financial
performance and enterprise value”
› Sustainable development
› Providers of capital
› Broad disclosure topics help › Providers of capital
› Industry ESG disclosure standards
Focus Areas organizations report management › Enables consistent climate-related
› Enables reporting of financially
of impacts on the economy, disclosures
material, decision-useful information
society and the environmentProminent Disclosure Standards Differ and Big Investors Favor Different Ones
Governance
TCFD
Strategy
DIFFERENT VIEWS OF MATERIALITY BETWEEN
STANDARDS/FRAMEWORKS
Risk Mgmt SUSTAINABILITY TOPICS MATERIAL FOR
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS
SUSTAINABILITY TOPICS MATERIAL
FOR ENTERPRISE VALUE CREATION
Metrics and
Targets ALREADY REFLECTED
Business IN FINANCIALS
Environment Model & IASB FASB
Innovation
TCFD, IIRC
Leadership
Social &
capital Governance SASB, CDSB
Human
GRI
CapitalThe Way You Manage ESG Impacts Investment and Voting
Companies with Strong ESG Management Companies with Weak ESG Management
› Receive investor voting support › Increasingly experience negative voting action
› Are included in ESG-focused indices › Access fewer pockets of capital
› Attract long-term investors seeking strong › Less likely to attract long-term investors
risk-adjusted returns seeking strong risk-adjusted returns
Building proprietary ESG rating system that will Letter writing campaign to 1,500+ Voting against ESG laggards Climbing support of
influence voting decisions; new policies on and boards calling for disclosure of identified by R-Factor ESG climate-focused
requirements for climate change and gender diversity workforce diversity data rating system shareholder proposals
Voting against directors/for shareholder Supported 47% of E&S shareholder Proprietary ESG rating system
Divesting climate laggards and
proposals where companies are proposals in the 2021 proxy season, in place used to pursue multiple
overweighting climate leaders identified
unresponsive to material E&S risks conducted 2,330 engagements re: climate varying ESG strategies
by proprietary ESG rating system
change and voted against 255 directors and
319 companies for climate-related concernsFOCUS FORWARD: CLIMATE
Investors of UK, European and US Companies Seek Climate Action
UK and Europe United States
European companies put forth board-sponsored
17 advisory resolutions on climate disclosures and
action plans at their AGMs, called Say on Climate
2 Board-sponsored Say on Climate resolutions
at annual meetings; one in Canada
97% Shareholder support was above 97% on average 110+ Environmental shareholder proposals submitted
in 2021, increasing for the second year in a row
100% Of 2021 resolutions relate to climate 36% Of environmental shareholder proposals voted
during the 2021 season passed
44% Average support for climate-related
shareholder proposals
US insights based on S&P 1500 companies. Source: ISS Corporate Solutions, as supplemented and confirmed through Georgeson research.2021 Is a Record-Breaking Year for ESG Issues in the US US Insight
Environmental Proposals That Passed
Report on the Impact of Mandatory Arbitration 1
Disclose EEO Data 2
Report on DE&I... 4
15%
Report on Lobbying 4
Climate Lobbying
39% Environmental Report on Political Contributions 6
15% GHG Emissions
Report on Human Rights… 1
Report on Climate Change Board Diversity Report 3
Pollution/Recycling
31% Report on Annual Climate Transition 1
Report on Plastic Pollution 1
Report on Climate Change 1
Social Proposals That Passed Report on Climate Lobbying 5
Policital Contributions (6)
Social GHG Emissions 4
Deforestation 2
Political Lobbying (4)
5%5% Miscellaneous Board/Director Related 1
5% 30%
EEO/D&IE/Employment Diversity:
Report on D&I Efforts (3) Company-Specific Governance Related 1
10% Board Diversity (2) Company-Specific Bylaw Amendments 2
Majority Vote for Election of Directors 5
10% EEO/D&IE/Employment Diversity: Declassify Board 5
Report/Disclose EEO Data (2) Adopt Proxy Access 1
15% 20% EEO/D&IE/Employment Diversity: Governance Special Meeting 4
General (1)
Written Consent 10
Employee Arbitration (1)
Reduce Supermajority/Adopt Simple Majority 19
Human Rights Related (1)
* 2 arbitration proposals received majority support, but the proposal
at Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. failed due to voting criteria.2020 European ESG Shareholder Proposals Mostly Lacked Majority Europe Insight
Support
Target Activist Main Resolutions Support
Approve climate change targets 3.2%
Approve climate change targets 8.1% In 2020, only a handful of
ESG-related shareholder
proposals were filed by
Approve climate change targets 14.4% institutional investors
Approve climate change targets 16.8%
Climate disclosure (TCFD) 22.4%
Only one proposal passed
(with late board support)
Disclose climate targets. 23.9% leading to the adoption of
the first Say on Climate vote
Climate plan and annual climate disclosure 97.3%
Shareholder proposals focusing on ESG failed to obtain support in most cases,
but the one that succeeded led to the first Say on Climate vote2021 European ESG Shareholder Proposals Were Europe Insight
Climate-Focused Again
Target Activist Main Resolutions Support
Shareholder Approve climate change targets 98.75%
Shareholder ESG proposals
Approve climate change targets 30.47% failed to obtain majority
approval (except for one,
which has Board support)
Approve climate change targets 20.65%
Approve climate change targets and
14.04%
annual climate disclosure
The number of shareholder
proposals focusing on ESG
Approve climate change targets 5.56%
lags behind the US (as has
been the case for years)
Annual climate & sustainability disclosure 2.65%
ESG shareholder proposals across Europe in 2021 again focused on climate,
but for the first time were complemented by Say on Climate board proposalsSay on Climate Board Proposals Emerged in 2021 in Europe Europe Insight
Companies across Europe moved to adopt so-called Say on Climate
votes and these proposals received high levels of shareholder support…
Company Date ISS GL
Aena S.M.E. SA ('20) 29/10/20 For For
% support
Vinci S.A. 08/04/21 For For
100.00%
Ferrovial S.A. 09/04/21 For Against
Ferrovial S.A. 09/04/21 For Abstain 98.00%
Nestlé S.A. 15/04/21 For Abstain 96.00%
Aena S.M.E. SA ('21) 27/04/21 For Against 94.00%
Glencore plc 29/04/21 For For 92.00%
Unilever plc 05/05/21 For For 90.00%
Aviva plc 06/05/21 For For
88.00%
Atos SE 12/05/21 For Abstain
86.00%
Royal Dutch Shell plc 18/05/21 For For
84.00%
HSBC Holdings plc 28/05/21 For For
Total SE 28/05/21 For For 82.00%
Iberdrola S.A. 17/06/21 For For
After 30/06/2021
Severn Trent plc 08/07/21 For Abstain
SSE plc 22/07/2021 For For
National Grid plc 26/07/21 For AbstainInvestor Pressure Will Continue to Drive Say on Climate Europe Insight
Expansion in Europe
In order for investors to do their job as stewards of capital,
companies must establish effective mechanisms to
demonstrate their net zero transition plans to
Many investors expect companies to: shareholders and outline how they will be achieved.
- Stephanie Pfeifer, Chief Executive, IIGCC (July 2021)
Disclose a Net Zero Transition Plan
Big investors demand annual vote on
companies’ net zero plans – July 2021
Identify the directors responsible for
Net Zero Transition Planning More than 50 asset managers including JPMorgan and
M&G want clearer progress.
Provide a routine advisory vote on
the implementation of the Net Zero (A)ctively engaging on how companies are managing the
Transition Plan risks of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions
remains a major focus of our stewardship efforts, as we
seek to play our part in helping to close the current gap.
- Yo Takatsuki, EMEA Head of Investment
Stewardship, J.P. Morgan Asset Management
$14 trillion investors call for consistency on ‘corporate net zero alignment plans’ and director accountability on climate targetsClimate and Other ESG Issues Will Increase and Evolve Going Forward
Non-profit foundation chartered to promote Aids children facing poverty and Green shareholders Large, global investor membership
corporate social responsibility other challenges in 24 countries pressuring the oil industry focused on climate change
Dropping the “Say” Calls for climate plans get louder Working within an ecosystem
In the US, proponents like TCI and AYS are Institutional Investors Group on Climate In addition, companies need to identify which
dropping the advisory vote component and Change, with $14T in assets, calls for all board directors, in addition to the chair,
instead focusing on emissions disclosure companies to produce a net-zero transition would lead the efforts and be the focal point
and the climate transition plan reporting plan in line with the Taskforce on Climate for engagement by investors, who would be
aspect of the proposal. Based on the results Related Financial Disclosures reporting voted against if the plan was considered
for 2 "CA 100+ benchmark" shareholder framework. inadequate. Will include an advisory vote in
proposals that went to a vote during certain markets.
2021, this is likely to be a well-supported
proposal formulation in 2022Be prepared for your AGM:
Climate and Other ESG Issues are here to stay
› Make sense of your ESG rating
- Nearly 80% of investors are using ratings agencies’ data to evaluate your company’s ESG risks and
opportunities
- On top of that, some shareholder proponents increasingly refer to a company’s benchmarks and ESG
scores to inform their proposal submissions. ESG on the engagement agenda
› Boards are now expected to oversee ESG issues tied to company strategy and performance and, when it
comes to investor conversations, directors need to be fluent in everything that is material to business goals
and value creation.
› Identify ESG frameworks and standards most supported by your investor base
› Maintain a laser focus on the ESG ratings most relied upon by your top investors, or those investors you
want to target
› Understand whether and how your investors use those ratings when making voting and investment
decisions
› Uncover what may be influencing your investors’ viewsComputershares
løsning til elektroniske
generalforsamlinger
Amina Skjødt,
VGM Specialist & Project
Manager, Computershare
37 Computershare PublicHvad tilbyder vores nye løsning?
Høj sikkerhed og brugervenligt, moderne interface
Lukket data
Nyt, moderne Oversigt designet Forbedret Q&A Mulighed for
management
interface til dirigenter moderation branding
system
Speciel oversigt Moderator kan
designet til sortere, gruppere og
Designet til at give en dirigenten. revidere spørgsmål,
Mulighed for
Al data opbevares i god brugeroplevelse tilføje svar til talere og
Under mødet har branding over for dit
Computershares for vores kunder og begrænse antallet af
moderator mulighed online publikum
sikre, beskyttede deres aktionærer. tegn eller spørgsmål
for at sende (logo, billeder, farver,
systemer. pr. deltager. Der er
spørgsmål, der skal video etc.)
også mulighed for at
adresseres på mødet, kommunikere 1-1 med
direkte til dirigenten. deltagere.
38 Computershare PublicVores nye løsning til elektroniske generalforsamlinger
Bygget på best practice og grundigt testet for at imødekomme markedskrav
Fuldelektronisk:
› Fuldstændig elektronisk
generalforsamling uden
mulighed for fysisk
fremmøde
Delvis elektronisk:
› Kombination af elektronisk
deltagelse og fysisk
fremmøde
39 Computershare PublicVælg mellem webcast med video eller audio-only
COVID-19 har sat skub i den digitale omstilling
Webcast:
› Kan optages på forhånd
› Med eller uden slides
› Ingen rejser er påkrævet
40 Computershare PublicNem opsætning og support gennem hele mødet
Du vælger om mødet
1 skal være fuldstændig
eller delvist elektronisk
Computershare vil:
Bekræfte dine krav til mødet.
Hjælpe med aktionær-
Vi arbejder sammen kommunikationen.
2 med dig om detaljerne,
og opsætter mødet Hjælpe med mødeindkaldelse og
med din branding virtuelle mødeinstruktioner.
Gennemgå teknologien med dig,
planlægge en ‘dry run’, hvis det
3 Vi supporterer dig ønskes, og tilbyde fuld support på
gennem hele mødet mødedagen.
41 Computershare PublicHvilke muligheder har aktionærerne under mødet?
Se webcast - video eller kun lyd Send spørgsmål
Se live webcast eller video optaget på Skriv spørgsmål online. Spørgsmål viser, hvem
forhånd, med eller uden slides afsenderen er, og kan kun ses af
mødearrangørerne, så du har fuld kontrol.
Stemme
Afgive deres stemme på afstemningspunkter Vis yderligere oplysninger
Angiv links til yderligere selskabsinformation
Adgang til indhold Vis optaget møde
Tilpas aktionærernes adgang til indhold for Mødeoptagelse tilgængelig i op til et år
at kontrollere, hvem der kan se hvilke
informationer
Funktionalitet der er i overensstemmelse med anbefalinger fra proxy advisors i forbindelse med aktionærengagement
42 Computershare PublicAktionæroplevelsen: Tilmelding via aktionærportalen 43 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Forside til mødet 44 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Log ind på mødet 45 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Se broadcast 46 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Afstemning 47 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Stemmebekræftelse 48 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Se afgivet stemme 49 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Q&A 50 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Q&A - valg af emne 51 Computershare Public
Aktionæroplevelsen: Q&A - spørgsmål er sendt 52 Computershare Public
Moderator: Oversigt 53 Computershare Public
Moderator: Håndtering af indkomne spørgsmål Kategori, svarmuligheder, bloker bruger, arkiver 54 Computershare Public
Moderator: Send spørgsmål til dirigenten 55 Computershare Public
Dirigentens oversigt: Q&A 56 Computershare Public
Dirigentens oversigt: Bestyrelsens stemmer 57 Computershare Public
Dirigentens oversigt: Watch list 58 Computershare Public
Dirigentens oversigt: Live afstemning 59 Computershare Public
Live resultater på storskærm / stream 60 Computershare Public
Fremmøde- og Q&A-rapporter umiddelbart efter mødet
Mødeinformation
› Deltagerliste
› Afstemningsresultater
› Dato og tidsstempel for log
ind/log ud
› Spørgsmål, afsender og
tidspunktQ&A og key take-aways › Vi sender link til optagelsen af dagens præsentation til alle deltagere. › Kontakt os hvis du har spørgsmål eller ønsker en demo af vores løsning til elektroniske generalforsamlinger.
Tak for i dag! Vi glæder os til at ser jer på generalforsamlingerne i 2022!
You can also read
