An Bord Pleanála - An Bord Pleanala

Page created by Francis Jimenez
 
CONTINUE READING
An Bord Pleanála

                         ROADS ACTS 1993 to 2007

           PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTS 2000 to 2014

                            Mayo County Council

             An Bord Pleanála Reference Number: 16.HA0042

APPLICATION by Mayo County Council for approval under section 51 of the
Roads Act, 1993, as amended, in accordance with documentation, including
an environmental impact statement and Natura impact statement, lodged with
An Bord Pleanála on the 29th day of August, 2013.

PROPOSED ROAD DEVELOPMENT: A new N5 road development which
includes a northern by-pass of Westport and an eastern bypass of Castlebar,
an upgrade to the existing N5 east of Castlebar, a bridge crossing of Lough
Lannagh and an upgrade to an existing bridge crossing of the Castlebar River,
to be located in the townlands of Westport Demesne (ED Westport Urban),
Creggaunnahorna, Deerpark East, Attireesh, Westport Demesne (ED
Kilmeena), Gortaroe, Carrowbeg, Knockranny, Monamore, Sheeroe,
Drummindoo, Carrownaclea, Sheean, Cogaula, Doon, Knockbrack,
Bullaunmeneen, Kilbree Lower, Drumneen, Cloonan, Dooleague,
Claggarnagh West, Claggarnagh East, Annagh, Cloonkeen, Pheasanthill,
Derrylea, Derrycoosh (ED Cloonkeen), Derrynashask, Derrinlevaun,
Cloondeash, Aghadrinagh, Lisnageeha or Antigua, Lisnakirka or Milebush,
Balloor, Hawthornlodge, Shanvally, Cottage, Drumaleheen, Kilkenny, Doogary
(ED Breaghwy), Carheens, Liscromwell, Aghalusky, Ballynew, Ballyneggin,
Breandrum or Windsor, Clogher (ED Turlough) Gortnafolla, Knockanour,
Turlough, Drumdaff and Capparanny, County Mayo.
The proposed road development comprises:

   23.7 kilometres of Type 2 Dual Carriageway.
   2.1 kilometres of Type 2 Single Carriageway.
   0.6 kilometres taper from Type 2 Dual to existing Single Carriageway.
______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 1 of 9
     Three compact grade separated junctions including overbridges.
     Six roundabouts.
     Two at grade left-in left-out junctions and one all movements at grade
      junction.
     One bridge widening over the Castlebar River.
     Two rail bridges over the Westport to Manulla Junction railway line.
     Eleven overbridges, two underbridges and seven farm underpasses.
     Associated earthworks diversion of services, realignment of existing roads,
      construction of accommodation tracks and ancillary works.
     Excavation of peat and unacceptable material, excavation of rock and
      disposal and recovery of unacceptable material.
     Drainage works, landscaping and diversion of services and ancillary
      works.

                                    DECISION

APPROVE that part of the development between the Newport Road to
Castlebar East (described as Sections A, B and C) based on the reasons
and considerations marked (1) under and subject to the conditions set
out below. REFUSE to approve that part of the development between
Castlebar East to Turlough (described as Section D) based on the
reasons and considerations marked (2) under.

                     REASONS AND CONSIDERATIONS (1)

In coming to its decision, the Board had regard to the following:

(a)    the provisions of the European Communities (Environmental Impact
       Assessment) Regulations 2001 (as amended), and the European
       Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011,

(b)    the provisions of the National Development Plan 2007 – 2013 regarding
       improvements to the national road network, the National Spatial Strategy
       for Ireland 2002 – 2020 and “Smarter Travel A Sustainable Transport
       Future – A Transport Policy for Ireland 2009 – 2020”,

(c)    the provisions of the Regional Planning Guidelines for the West Region
       2010-2022, including Objective I05, which identifies the roads projects
       considered a priority for completion, and includes the ‘N5 Westport to
       Longford to Roscommon borders’,

(d)    the policies and objectives of the Mayo County Development Plan 2014-
       2020,

______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 2 of 9
(e)   the policies and objectives of the Mayo County Development Plan 2008
      – 2014, including Objectives NP2, NP4 and NP5, as set out in Appendix
      1 of the development plan, which seek to commence land acquisition
      and construction of the Westport Castlebar section, and to commence
      design and land acquisition for the Castlebar by-pass and the Westport
      Northern Relief Road respectively,

(f)   the policies and objectives of the Castlebar Town and Environs
      Development Plan 2008-2014, and Variation 3 of same made in
      February, 2013 to incorporate the alignment of the subject road scheme,

(g)   the policies and objectives of the Westport Town and Environs
      Development Plan 2010-2016, and Variations 2 and 3 of same made in
      2012 to incorporate the alignment of the subject road scheme,

(h)   the sub-standard nature of the existing N5 national primary road
      between Westport and Castlebar in terms of the number of direct access
      points onto and off the roadway, the road width, the road alignment and
      the resultant traffic safety improvements arising from the proposed road
      development,

(i)   the traffic congestion currently being experienced in the town of
      Castlebar and, to a lesser extent, Westport,

(j)   the community need, public interest served and overall benefits to be
      achieved from the proposed road development,

(k)   the extensive route selection procedures undertaken by the Road
      Authority,

(l)   the local authority initiatives to promote cycle and pedestrian
      infrastructure in the county, and Westport’s designation as one of
      Ireland’s first three ‘Smarter Travel Demonstration Areas’,

(m) the environmental impact statement and the Natura impact statement
    submitted in support of the application,

(n)   the submissions made during the application process, including the oral
      hearing, and the range of mitigation measures set out in the
      documentation received, and

(o)   the report of the planning inspector, including the supporting report of the
      assisting inspector,

The Board was satisfied that the information before it was adequate for the
purposes of undertaking an environmental impact assessment and an
appropriate assessment in respect of the proposed development.

______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 3 of 9
Environmental Impact Assessment:

The Board considered and generally adopted the environmental impact
assessment carried out by the Inspector.

The Board shared the Inspector’s concerns regarding the impact that the
proposed roundabout at Knockranny South might have on the setting of, and
the approaches to, Westport Town. The Board attached a condition to
mitigate the impact of this roundabout by requiring a reduction of same.

The Board noted the input from the Annagh Residents and the views of the
Inspector regarding the negative visual impact that would arise from the
proposed bridge over Lough Lannagh. The Board considered that the visual
and landscape impacts were not acceptable or justified and decided to omit
the bridge and require alternative access arrangements by condition.

The Board noted the comment of the Inspector that the proposed
development would be likely to cause a marginal increase in the emissions of
greenhouse gases. However, the Board considered that this effect would be
justified by the overall benefits of the proposed road development.

Having regard to the nature, scale and design of the proposed road
development, the environmental impact statement submitted with the
application, the submissions on file and received at the oral hearing, and the
Inspector’s assessment of environmental impacts, which is noted and
generally adopted, the Board completed an environmental impact assessment
and concluded that, subject to the conditions set out below, Sections A, B and
C of the proposed road development would not be likely to have significant
adverse effects on the environment.

Appropriate Assessment:

Having regard to the nature, scale and design of the proposed road
development, the Natura impact statement and the environmental impact
statement submitted with the application, the submissions on file and received
at the oral hearing, and the Inspector’s assessment, which is noted, the Board
completed an appropriate assessment of the proposed road development on
the River Moy Special Area of Conservation (site code 002298). The Board
was satisfied that the part of the proposed road development being approved
(Sections A, B and C), in itself or in combination with other plans or projects,
would not adversely affect the integrity of the European sites in the vicinity in
view of the conservation objectives of those sites. The Board noted the
Inspector’s concern in relation to the potential impacts of Section D of the
proposed road development on the River Moy Special Area of Conservation
when considered in combination with other future planned road projects, but in
light of the decision to omit Section D for other reasons (as set out in Reasons
and Considerations (2) below), the Board did not consider that these concerns
would have any implications for the completion of Sections A, B and C of the
proposed road development.

______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 4 of 9
Additional Considerations:

In deciding not to accept the Inspector’s recommendation to seek further
information in relation to the severance of routes serving pedestrian and
cyclists in parts of Section A of the proposed roadway, the Board considered
that these design concerns could be addressed by way of condition.

The Board shared the Inspector’s reservations in respect of the proposed
bridge at Lough Lannagh which is designed to serve Annagh Road, a minor
country lane ‘cul de sac’ serving a small number of properties. The Board
considered that the scale of the proposed bridge, comprising a 5-span bridge
of approximately 120 metres in length, would have a significant negative
impact on the landscape at Lough Lannagh and the Board, therefore,
concluded that the justification for the bridge was insufficient to render the
environmental and landscape impacts acceptable. The Board noted the
alternative route discussed during the oral hearing and considered that
connecting the Annagh Road by the alternative route would be preferable.
The Board considered that this route could be delivered with significantly
reduced environmental impact and was of the view that the reservations
expressed by the applicant were amenable to resolution.

The Board also considered that a number of the proposed roundabouts, and
in some cases the associated slip roads, are over-designed for the traffic
volumes envisaged and would involve environmental impacts without
sufficient justification. The Board, therefore, attached conditions to omit the
slip lanes at the Knockranny North and Castlebar East roundabouts and to
reduce the diameter of the Knockranny South roundabout.

The Board was satisfied that the amendments sought by the conditions set
out below would not lead to significant effects on the environment and would
not have significant implications for the Compulsory Purchase Order.

Conclusion:

It is considered that, subject to compliance with the conditions set out below,
Sections A, B and C of the proposed road development would not have
significant negative effects on the community in the vicinity, would not give
rise to a risk of pollution, would not have a detrimental impact on
archaeological heritage, would not give rise to detrimental visual or landscape
impacts, and would not seriously injure the amenities of the area or of
property in the vicinity. It is considered that the proposed road development,
which would constitute an improvement in terms of road safety and
convenience, would be in the interest of the common good and would be in
accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development of the
area.

______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 5 of 9
CONDITIONS

1.   The development shall be carried out and completed in accordance with
     the plans and particulars lodged with the application, as amended by the
     further information submitted to An Bord Pleanála at the oral hearing on
     dates between January 14th and 17th, 2014 and January 21st and 23rd,
     2014, including the environmental impact statement and Natura impact
     statement and supporting documentation, except as may be otherwise
     required in order to comply with the conditions set out below.

     Reason: In the interest of clarity.

2.   The proposals, mitigation measures and commitments set out in the
     environmental impact statement and Natura impact statement and
     supporting documentation, and as further clarified by submissions made
     by the road authority to the oral hearing on various dates between
     January 14th and 17th, 2014 and January 21st and 23rd, 2014, shall be
     implemented as part of the proposed road development.

     Reason: In the interest of clarity and to mitigate the environmental
     effects of the proposed road development and to protect the amenities of
     the area and of property in the vicinity.

3.   Section A of the proposed roadway, that is from the Newport Road to
     Knockranny South, shall be modified as follows:

     (a)   A one metre wide grass verge shall be provided between the
           vehicular carriageway and proposed footpath/cycleway starting
           from the junction with the Attireesh Road (opposite plot P0180) to,
           and along, the south side N5/N59 link road (from chainage 2+000
           to 2+764) as far as the junction with the old railway line on the
           Carrowbeg Road (at plot P0100).

     (b)   A one metre wide grass verge shall be provided between the
           vehicular carriageway and proposed footpath/cycleway starting
           from the Allergan junction on the Carrowbeg Road to, and along,
           the south side N5/N59 link road (from chainage 3+000 to 4+305).
           The footpath, cycleway and grass verged area shall also extend
           south along the Knockranny Link Road to the Knockranny South
           roundabout and west to plot P0525.

     (c)   A grade separated crossing (underpass or over bridge) with
           appropriate signage and road markings shall be provided across
           the N5/N59 link road (between chainage 2+000 and 2+300) to
           facilitate a continuity of movement for pedestrians and cyclists to
           and from the Great Western Greenway and the Western way.

     (d)   The proposed Lodge Road underpass (under the proposed N5/N59
           link road) shall include provision for pedestrians and cyclists.

______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 6 of 9
(e)   A link for pedestrians and cyclists shall be provided from the Lodge
           Road to the N5/N59 Link Road.

     Reason: In the interest of traffic, cyclist and pedestrian safety and to
     support the cycling and walking asset that has been successfully
     promoted in the county.

4.   Section A of the proposed roadway shall be further modified as follows:

     (a)   The slip road at the Knockranny North roundabout from the
           proposed N5 to the Knockranny Link Road shall be omitted.

     (b)   The proposed Knockranny South roundabout shall be reduced from
           80 metres to a maximum of 50 metres diameter.

     (c)   The amended layout at these two roundabouts shall make
           improved provision for pedestrians and cyclists.

     Reason: In the interest of amenity on the approaches to Westport and in
     the interest of the safety of road users.

5.   Section B of the proposed roadway, that is from Knockranny North to
     Castlebar West, shall be modified so that the proposed bridge over the
     N5 at Islandeady shall include provision for pedestrians and cyclists.

     Reason: In the interest of traffic, cyclist and pedestrian safety, to support
     the cycling and walking asset that has been successfully promoted in the
     county, and to facilitate connectivity to the proposed Castlebar-
     Islandeady Greenway.

6.   Section B of the proposed roadway shall be further modified as follows:

     (a)   The proposed over bridge at Lough Lannagh and associated works
           to serve the Annagh Road shall be omitted.

     (b)   A new local road link shall be provided immediately adjacent to the
           northern carriageway of the N5 to link the Annagh Road to the
           “Fore Annagh Road”.

     (c)   A new underpass shall be provided under the proposed N5 at the
           “Fore Annagh Road” to serve local traffic.

     Reason: In the interest of protecting the visual and landscape amenities
     of Lough Lannagh, and having regard to the need to serve the low traffic
     volumes accessing and egressing Annagh Road.

______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 7 of 9
7.   Section C of the proposed roadway, that is from Castlebar West to
     Castlebar East, shall be modified as follows:

     The slip roads at the proposed Castlebar Road East roundabout shall be
     omitted.

     Reason: In the interest of amenity on the approaches to Castlebar, and
     in the interest of the safety of road users.

8.   Section D of the proposed roadway, that is from Castlebar East to
     Turlough, shall be omitted with the exception of works required to
     accommodate the approach to the roundabout. No works required for
     the approach to the roundabout shall extend eastwards of chainage
     40+400.

     Reason: In the interest of clarity having regard to the refusal of Section
     D of the proposed roadway.

                    REASONS AND CONSIDERATIONS (2)

Having regard to:

     (a)   the relatively recent upgrade of this section of the N5 roadway on a
           greenfield line between Castlebar and Turlough,

     (b)   the compliance of the existing road with current standards for Type
           2 single carriageways and the current condition of the road in terms
           of surface treatment, cross sectional dimensions, horizontal and
           vertical alignment and the existence of continuous hard shoulders
           that are generally wider than those required by design standards,

     (c)   the existing and future predicted traffic volumes for this section of
           road,

     (d)   the proximity of the proposed road to cultural and natural heritage
           assets at Turlough Park, Turlough Church and the trees at Clogher,
           and the potential impacts on these heritage assets, and

     (e)   the report of the person who conducted the oral hearing into the
           application for approval of the proposed road development,

______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 8 of 9
it is considered that the proposal to advance this section of the N5 roadway
from Castlebar East to Turlough to dual carriageway standard at this time has
not been adequately justified by traffic and safety considerations, having
regard to the environmental impacts arising. The proposed development,
described as Section D, would, therefore, be contrary to the proper planning
and sustainable development of the area.

                                Member of An Bord Pleanála
                                duly authorised to authenticate
                                the seal of the Board.

                                Dated this        day of              2014.

______________________________________________________________
16.HA0042               An Bord Pleanála             Page 9 of 9
You can also read