Extinct flagships: linking extinct and threatened species - Cambridge University ...

Page created by Bobby Price
 
CONTINUE READING
Extinct flagships: linking extinct and threatened species - Cambridge University ...
Extinct flagships: linking extinct and
           threatened species
                                                                                                 P E T E R M . K Y N E and V A N E S S A M . A D A M S

           Abstract Despite much effort to promote the conservation                              Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable (IUCN,
           and recovery of threatened species, the extent of the current                         b). Despite the expansion of our ecological understand-
           list of threatened vertebrates (. , species) underscores                          ing and knowledge, the number of threatened species con-
           the need to develop novel communication and marketing                                 tinues to increase (Hoffmann et al., ).
           tools to raise awareness and funding for their conservation.                              There has been much effort worldwide to promote con-
           Although flagship species have been widely used in conser-                            servation of threatened species, including the effective use of
           vation marketing, the flagship role of extinct species has                            flagship species to raise awareness and funds (Veríssimo
           been largely overlooked and the status of lost species is rare-                       et al., a; Jepson & Barua, ). A flagship species is
           ly associated with the status of extant species facing a high                         ‘used as the focus of a broader conservation marketing cam-
           risk of extinction. Some extinct species (e.g. the dodo                               paign based on its possession of one or more traits that ap-
           Raphus cucullatus and the thylacine Thylacinus cynocepha-                             peal to the target audience’ (Veríssimo et al., a). Flagship
           lus) are cultural and commercial icons and therefore famil-                           species have high public appeal and can invoke an emotive
           iar, and may appeal to the public as conservation flagships.                          response in the public that can result in positive outcomes
           We propose a wider use of extinct flagships to raise aware-                           for biodiversity (e.g. awareness gained, funds raised; Smith
           ness for the conservation of threatened species by making a                           et al., ; Jepson & Barua, ). One criticism of flagship
           direct link between already extinct species and extant species                        species, however, is that the money raised is often tied to a
           at risk of extinction. We present examples of publicly recog-                         particular species and is unlikely to benefit other threatened
           nized and iconic extinct species that could be used in mar-                           species (Joseph et al., ). Thus, other approaches, such as
           keting for the conservation of threatened species. These                              flagship projects or flagship fleets, have been proposed
           extinct species are familiar and may be readily linked to                             (Joseph et al., ; Veríssimo et al., b, ), shifting
           threatened species or species groups. We outline a roadmap                            the focus from individual species.
           for testing their appeal under the extinct flagship concept,                              Some extinct species may be appropriate flagship species
           through market research. If research identifies that a cogni-                         given their iconic status in popular culture. Here we outline
           tive link is made between the fate of an extinct species (i.e.                        the concept of the extinct flagship, in particular using
           they went extinct from human causes) and what may hap-                                publicly-familiar and valued (appealing) extinct species
           pen to threatened species (i.e. they are at risk of extinction                        for conservation awareness, education and fund-raising.
           from human causes), extinct species may well have a wider                             The concept recognizes the fate of lost species but explicitly
           role to play as conservation flagships.                                               links the past to the present (and the future); there may not
                                                                                                 be an opportunity to recover an extinct species but there are
           Keywords Conservation funding, dodo, extinction, flagship
                                                                                                 opportunities to recover threatened species if action is taken
           species, passenger pigeon, threatened species, thylacine
                                                                                                 now.
                                                                                                     Extinct species have been used previously in conserva-
                                                                                                 tion marketing to raise general awareness of conservation is-
           Introduction
                                                                                                 sues. Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, for example, uses
                he rate of biodiversity loss is –, times greater                          the dodo Raphus cucullatus as its logo to champion its mis-
           T    than estimated pre-industrial rates and exceeds planet-
           ary boundaries for biosphere integrity (Rockström et al.,
                                                                                                 sion ‘to save species from extinction, especially those under
                                                                                                 threat and overlooked’ (Durrell Wildlife Conservation
           ). Since  there have been  recorded extinctions                            Trust, undated). Similarly, Project Passenger Pigeon ()
           of vertebrate species, and a further  species exist only in                         used the th anniversary of the extinction of the passenger
           captivity (IUCN, b). On the IUCN Red List of                                      pigeon Ectopistes migratorius to raise awareness of human-
           Threatened Species, , species are categorized as                                  caused extinctions, and the passenger pigeon has been de-
                                                                                                 scribed as ‘an excellent tool for conservation education’
                                                                                                 (Blockstein & Evans, ). However, extinct species have
           PETER M. KYNE (Corresponding author) and VANESSA M. ADAMS* Research                   not been used in a formal flagship model to draw an explicit
           Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University,
           Darwin 0909, Northern Territory, Australia. E-mail peter.kyne@cdu.edu.au              link between extinct and threatened species for targeted
           *Also at: The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia               marketing purposes.
           Received  May . Revision requested  July .
                                                                                                     Conservationists have been criticized for negative mes-
           Accepted  January . First published online  May .                           sages and approaches to marketing conservation (Vasi &

           Oryx, 2017, 51(3), 471–476 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000041
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 03 May 2021 at 06:14:40, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000041
472         P. M. Kyne and V. M. Adams

             Macy, ; Weinstein et al., ). With this in mind, ex-                           TABLE 1 Relevant questions to inform the selection of extinct flag-
             tinct flagship species are at the interface between negative                          ship species.
             and positive messages and marketing. On the one hand,                                 Is the extinct species familiar, or has it the potential to become
             an extinct species highlights loss and touches on emotions                            familiar?
             of guilt and sorrow. Conversely, it also inspires action (‘we                         Can the extinct species be linked taxonomically to the species or
             can’t let this happen again’), with a focus on opportunities to                       group of species of conservation concern? (In all cases such a link
             recover or save extant species that are threatened with ex-                           should be tenable.)
             tinction. Rather than simply connecting extinction with                               Can the extinct species be linked geographically to the species or
             broad conservation messages, as has typically been done                               group of species of conservation concern? In particular cases,
                                                                                                   extinct flagships can be champions of global conservation needs
             in conservation marketing, we argue that an explicit link                             (e.g. Steller’s sea cow Hydrodamalis gigas as a champion for
             is needed to make extinct flagships more effective. We                                sirenians).
             argue that a clear link between a single extinct species and                          Does the extinct species have public appeal as a marketable flagship
             a directly related threatened species or species group would                          species? (This question should be answered by researching the
             provide a more systematic use of extinct flagships. Linking                           targeted audience.)
             the possibly intimidating message of extinction to a call for                         Are the causes of extinction related to the threats facing an extant
             action (including indicating how to make a difference for                             species? (This may not be essential.)
                                                                                                   Can the extinct species be used to highlight threatening processes
             current threatened species) draws on evidence that combin-
                                                                                                   relevant to the threatened species?
             ing fear with an appeal to act is an effective communication                          What have we learnt from the extinct species that can be applied to
             tool if the audience feels able to effect change (Rogers &                            the conservation and management needs of the threatened species?
             Mewborn, ; Vasi & Macy, ; Weinstein et al.,                                   Can the extinct species and target group of species fit within a
             ). We use a simple method to identify possible extinct                            flagship species selection framework (e.g. Veríssimo et al., 2011a)?
             flagships, and discuss the marketing research required to as-
             sess the utility of the extinct flagship concept, with the gen-
             eral public as the target audience.                                                   taxonomically or geographically (or both); and () appeal
                                                                                                   (Jepson & Barua, ). A series of additional relevant ques-
                                                                                                   tions can be asked in relation to candidate species (Table ),
             Identifying candidate extinct flagships                                               including fitting the extinct species and target group of
                                                                                                   threatened species within existing selection frameworks
             The use of extinct species in marketing conservation is not a                         for flagship species (e.g. Veríssimo et al., a).
             new concept. However, and somewhat surprisingly, the use                                 As a starting point to the discussion of extinct flagships
             of extinct species in direct marketing of conservation pro-                           we identified potential candidates based on trait , public fa-
             jects for threatened species is not widespread. The obvious,                          miliarity, using a simple quantitative internet search meth-
             but underutilized, link is to connect extinction with threat of                       od. We conducted an image search for ‘extinct species’ on
             extinction within the flagship species framework. The link                            Google Australia (Google Inc., Mountain View, USA), and
             between extinction and threatened status is made directly                             tabulated the frequency of hits by species for the first 
             and the conservation message of extinct flagships is clear:                           images. Extinct species were restricted to those that have
             we must act now to prevent other threatened species from                              gone extinct since  AD (following IUCN Red List guide-
             going extinct.                                                                        lines; IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, ).
                 Extinct flagships present an innovative solution to the                           We calculated a Familiarity Index as the number of species-
             issue of funds being tied to the conservation of particular                           specific hits divided by the total number of hits for all
             threatened species; the funds raised under an extinct flag-                           species.
             ship are not tied to the conservation of that species, as it is                          Extinct flagship candidates identified by their Familiarity
             already extinct. Funds could be spent optimally across re-                            Index, with examples of conservation campaigns that they
             lated taxa or geographical regions, thus maximizing gains                             could champion, are listed in Table . This list is intended
             for the conservation of threatened species (Bennett et al.,                           to be illustrative and to demonstrate the clear links that
             ). It has been recognized that flagships can decrease                             can be made between extinct species (the flagship) and ex-
             the attractiveness of non-flagship species (Douglas &                                 tant species (the threatened fauna). Based on the Familiarity
             Winkel, ) but this can be circumvented with the use                               Index we identified the dodo (high international profile), the
             of extinct species, which cannot be valued more highly                                thylacine Thylacinus cynocephalus (high national profile in
             than extant fauna as they no longer exist.                                            Australia) and the passenger pigeon ( marked  years
                 Not all extinct species are suitable flagship species, and                        since the death of the last known individual) as the most fa-
             here we propose three central traits of extinct flagships: ()                        miliar recently extinct species. We use these as examples of
             public familiarity, or the potential to increase familiarity                          extinct flagships, focusing on two traits that could be lever-
             through marketing; () a link to threatened fauna, either                             aged for funding: current familiarity and a link to threatened

                                                                                        Oryx, 2017, 51(3), 471–476 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000041
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 03 May 2021 at 06:14:40, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000041
Linking extinct and threatened species                   473

           TABLE 2 The top  candidate extinct flagship species, based on their Familiarity Index, and linked groups of threatened species in need of
           conservation action.

                                                                                                                                                              Familiarity
           Extinct flagship                                Linked conservation campaign (No. of extant threatened species)1                                   Index2
           Dodo Raphus cucullatus                          Mauritius’ bird fauna (7) or threatened island endemic birds more broadly                          0.301
           Thylacine Thylacinus cynocephalus               Australia’s terrestrial mammal fauna (52)                                                          0.260
           Passenger pigeon Ectopistes                     North America’s land bird fauna (25)                                                               0.137
           migratorius
           Pinta Island tortoise Chelonoidis               Global amphibians (1,957)                                                                          0.110
           nigra abingdoni3
           Baiji (Yangtze River dolphin) Lipotes           River dolphins or threatened cetaceans more broadly (or Asian rivers as an                         0.055
           vexillifer                                      example of a landscape-scale application)
           Steller’s sea cow Hydrodamalis gigas            Global sirenians (4)                                                                               0.055
           Caribbean monk seal Monachus                    Global pinnipeds (9)                                                                               0.041
           tropicalis
           Great auk Pinguinus impennis                    Global alcids (5) or threatened seabirds more broadly                                              0.041
           
            Numbers of extant threatened species calculated from IUCN (a)
           
             Based on quantitative internet search for images (see main text for further details)
           
             Subspecies of Galapagos tortoise Chelonoides nigra

           species. We identified the links to threatened species based                              Some of Mauritius’ endemic species, for example the
           on taxonomy and geography (Table ). However, we would                                Mauritius kestrel Falco punctatus and pink pigeon
           need to test their psychological impacts and behavioural                              Nesoenas mayeri, remain in existence only as a result of
           outcomes among the target audience.                                                   dedicated efforts to conserve them. They are conservation
                                                                                                 success stories (e.g. Jones et al., ) but these species are
           The dodo’s familiarity                                                                not recognized by the public in the way that the dodo is.
                                                                                                 Although one could argue that they are effective ambassa-
           The dodo is one of the most famous birds, living or extinct,                          dors for the country’s threatened birds, they are not as
           and has been described as ‘a leading contender as the ‘icon’                          widely known or appreciated as the dodo. Individually, re-
           of extinction’ (Hume, ). It is estimated to have gone ex-                         sourcing the conservation of the Mauritius olive white-eye
           tinct during the late th century (Roberts & Solow, ;                            or the Endangered Mauritius fody Foudia rubra is likely to
           Hume, ), as a result of direct harvesting by people                               be a hard sell to members of the public. The government
           and the introduction of exotic animals to its Western                                 and NGOs could market these species and the other threa-
           Indian Ocean island home of Mauritius, where it was en-                               tened birds of Mauritius as a package centred around the
           demic (Hume, ).                                                                   island’s high rate of extinction, with the dodo as the flag-
               Although long extinct, the dodo is ubiquitous in                                  ship, to encourage a public sense of responsibility (regard-
           Mauritius. It features as the background of the country’s im-                         less of when extinction occurred) and a sense of ownership
           migration form, the watermark of the local currency, a fig-                           of currently threatened species, which is valuable for lever-
           ure in the country’s coat of arms, and a local carnival mascot                        aging funds and action. The dodo therefore presents an op-
           (Plate a). It would seem that its extinction promotes its le-                        portunity to create a targeted marketing message that there
           gendary status and iconic value.                                                      is a conservation crisis in Mauritius and that without sus-
               Despite the dodo’s celebrity status we argue that the link                        tained action a further seven native birds in Mauritius are
           between the past (extinct species) and the present (threa-                            likely to go the way of the dodo. Although the Durrell
           tened species) could be used more explicitly to leverage con-                         Wildlife Conservation Trust uses the emblem of the dodo
           servation action for Mauritius, which along with the                                  in much of its work in Mauritius to remind us of the
           adjacent island of Rodrigues has a disproportionally high re-                         need for conservation action, it also uses the logo more
           cord of avian extinction. Of  native terrestrial birds,  are                      broadly to champion the Trust’s mission to save species
           extinct, accounting for .% of known extinct bird species                           from extinction. This use of the same logo for both targeted
           globally, and seven are threatened with extinction (Fig. ).                          and mass marketing may dilute the message of the
           The status of the Critically Endangered Mauritius olive                               Mauritius conservation crisis. A targeted use of the dodo
           white-eye Zosterops chloronothus (Plate c), for example, a                           as an extinct flagship would require it to be used directly
           small, drab songbird, is largely unknown to the general pub-                          to communicate the conservation needs of threatened
           lic. However, it is only one step removed from the dodo as it                         birds in Mauritius, rather than threatened species more
           faces an extremely high risk of extinction.                                           broadly.

           Oryx, 2017, 51(3), 471–476 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000041
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 03 May 2021 at 06:14:40, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000041
474         P. M. Kyne and V. M. Adams

                                                                                                   FIG. 1 IUCN Red List status (IUCN, a) for Mauritian land
                                                                                                   birds (n = ) and Australian land mammals (n = ). EX,
             PLATE 1 Images of (a) the dodo Raphus cucullatus and (b) the                          Extinct: ‘there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has
             thylacine Thylacinus cynocephalus used in commercial                                  died’; Threatened (encompassing CR, Critically Endangered: a
             advertising; (c) the Mauritius olive white-eye Zosterops                              species ‘facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild’;
             chloronothus and (d) the central rock-rat Zyzomys pedunculatus,                       EN, Endangered: a species ‘facing a very high risk of extinction
             both of which are Critically Endangered. (c) and (d) are poorly                       in the wild’; and VU, Vulnerable: a species ‘facing a high risk of
             known and have less marketability as flagship species, but can be                     extinction in the wild’); NT, Near Threatened: ‘does not qualify
             directly linked to (a) and (b), respectively, which have high                         for CR, EN or VU now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely
             conservation marketability. Photographs: Peter Kyne (a,b,c),                          to qualify for a threatened category in the near future’; LC, Least
             Patrick Hodgens (d).                                                                  Concern: ‘does not qualify for CR, EN, VU or NT’; DD, Data
                                                                                                   Deficient: ‘there is inadequate information to make a direct or
                                                                                                   indirect assessment of its risk of extinction’ (IUCN, ).
             The thylacine’s appeal

             The thylacine, or Tasmanian tiger, was a dog-like carnivor-                           for c. % of the global total of extinct mammal species
             ous marsupial that originally occupied mainland Australia                             (Johnson, ). The extant mammalian fauna are not far-
             and the island state of Tasmania to the south. Its extinction                         ing well:  species (.%) are threatened with extinction
             on the mainland is linked to the arrival of a morphologically                         (IUCN, a; Fig. ). Although a few of these have a high
             convergent predator, the dingo Canis lupus dingo, some                                public profile, in particular the Tasmanian devil
             , years ago (Fillios et al., ; Letnic et al., ); the                      Sarcophilus harrisii and the bilby Macrotis lagotis, many
             isolated Tasmanian population remained extant until                                   more are not publicly recognized or charismatic (e.g. the
             more recently given the absence of dingoes from the island.                           lesser stick-nest rat Leporillus apicalis and the central rock-
             Its demise in Tasmania is attributed to direct persecution by                         rat Zyzomys pedunculatus; Plate d).
             people, as well as disease; the last known thylacine died in                             Attempting to expand the public’s understanding of, and
             captivity in  (Paddle, , ). The species remains                           familiarity with, an extant species such as the Tasmanian
             a regular subject of reported ‘sightings’ (e.g. Heberle, )                        devil to include lesser known threatened species may be
             but there is no scientific evidence to support anything but its                       problematic given that marketing a single extant species
             extinction. The thylacine has not been embraced widely for                            can tie funds to that species only, and the recovery of that
             conservation messaging, as the continuing quest to redis-                             species may be seen as an end-point in the conservation
             cover it (Turner, ) distracts from accepting its status                           campaign (i.e. it does not represent the fate of the whole
             (extinction) and marketing its loss for the protection of ex-                         community of threatened species; Joseph et al., ). The
             tant threatened species.                                                              thylacine, however, was a unique species and has a high
                 The thylacine has been described as a ‘potent cultural                            level of cultural and societal appeal, as demonstrated by its
             icon’, ‘functioning in effect as Tasmania’s brand logo’                               existing commercial use. It is a prime example of how an ap-
             (Turner, ). Depictions of the thylacine can be found                              pealing extinct species can be linked explicitly to a group of
             across the state, including on vehicle number plates and as                           threatened species and, in this case, the need to act to con-
             a logo for one of the state’s largest breweries (Plate b). Like                      serve Australia’s threatened mammals.
             the dodo, the thylacine exemplifies a tendency to value a
             species because it is extinct, and a failing to link past extinc-
             tion and current conservation status.                                                 The passenger pigeon’s marketability
                 The thylacine is one of  Australian mammals declared
             extinct since European settlement. Australia has the highest                          The passenger pigeon was once one of North America’s
             rate of mammalian extinction of any continent, accounting                             most abundant birds but the last known individual,

                                                                                        Oryx, 2017, 51(3), 471–476 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000041
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 03 May 2021 at 06:14:40, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000041
Linking extinct and threatened species                   475

           Martha, died in the Cincinnati Zoo in . The extinction of                            The use of extinct flagships as a novel approach to sup-
           the passenger pigeon is attributed to a combination of                                porting conservation of extant threatened species would
           human exploitation (e.g. reduction of suitable forest habitat                         need to be accompanied by carefully designed media and
           and over-hunting; Halliday, ) and population fluctua-                             marketing campaigns that target the message appropriately
           tions in response to climatic, food-resource and other eco-                           for various segments of the audience. We identify four key
           logical variations (Hung et al., ).                                               research areas for determining whether extinct flagships are
               The marketability of the passenger pigeon received a                              an effective approach for conservation marketing of threa-
           boost with the wide publicity marking the centennial of its                           tened species: () Formative research to test the concept of
           extinction, in September . Project Passenger Pigeon                               extinct flagships; central to this is testing whether the public
           used the th anniversary of the extinction ‘to raise aware-                         identifies a connection between their fate and the conserva-
           ness of current issues related to human-caused extinction’                            tion status of threatened species. () If research confirms
           and to recognize that ‘extinction is ecologically, culturally,                        that a cognitive link can be established between the fate of
           and morally relevant to the st Century’ (Project                                    extinct species and threatened species, the next step is to
           Passenger Pigeon, ). Applying the concept of the pas-                             understand what emotions messages about extinct flagship
           senger pigeon as an extinct flagship would reframe this mes-                          species invoke, such as fear, loss or a connection to extant
           sage to draw direct links between the fate of the passenger                           species. This is important to inform the design of further
           pigeon and currently threatened species needing immediate                             messages, such as coupling threatening messages with ap-
           conservation attention.                                                               peals for action (Vasi & Macy, ). () Our simple method
               North America has  threatened species of land birds,                            of selecting familiar extinct species identified candidate ex-
           and this number is likely to increase as populations of aerial                        tinct flagships; however, further research is needed to ad-
           insectivores and grassland birds continue to decline (Sauer                           dress whether these species have broad public appeal, and
           et al., ). Some threatened species have a significant pub-                        the cultural context in which they are embedded. This will
           lic profile; for example, the Californian condor Gymnogyps                            address whether they have the potential to gain popularity
           californianus is a cultural icon (Alagona, ). Others,                             and drive behavioural change that will result in conservation
           such as the saltmarsh sparrow Ammodramus caudacutus                                   action for threatened species (Jepson & Barua, ). () In
           and Sprague’s pipit Anthus spragueii, have a low profile.                             addition to establishing whether these species have broad
           Linking the passenger pigeon with these low-profile species                           public appeal, a stronger understanding of how various seg-
           could leverage marketing and fund-raising to support the                              ments of the market respond to extinct flagships and asso-
           management of threatened bird species in North America.                               ciated messages will be critical for targeting messages to
           Furthermore, the passenger pigeon may not be tied only to                             maximize conservation outcomes (e.g. Vasi & Macy, ;
           the status of North American birds; comparable population                             Weinstein et al., ). Research on these four areas will
           collapses have been reported in an abundant and wide-                                 help conservation practitioners capitalize on the familiarity
           spread Eurasian songbird, the yellow-breasted bunting                                 of popular extinct species, marketing them as flagship spe-
           Emberiza aureola (Kamp et al., ).                                                 cies to drive conservation action to save currently threatened
                                                                                                 species.

           Discussion: marketing extinction
                                                                                                 Acknowledgements
           The dodo, thylacine and passenger pigeon (among other
           species) are examples of candidate extinct flagships to sup-                          We thank Andrew Chin, Nic Bax and Micha Jackson for
           port the conservation of extant threatened species. The les-                          their valuable comments, and Patrick Hodgens for Plate
           sons learned from these species may be leveraged to raise                             d. Edoardo Mostarda and Jessica Sanders provided PMK
           funds for action on species that are linked directly to the flag-                     with the opportunity to visit Mauritius, which was the
           ships by taxonomy or geography. Thus money can be raised                              catalyst for this work. The authors are supported by
           to prevent extinctions of a clearly defined group of species,                         the Marine Biodiversity and Northern Australia Hubs, col-
           such as Mauritian birds or Australian mammals, rather than                            laborative partnerships supported through funding from the
           a single species. Effective flagship species bridge pre-existing                      Australian Government’s National Environmental Research
           frames involving the species with new frames that inform a                            Programme.
           conservation agenda in relation to a broader political or so-
           cietal cause (Jepson & Barua, ). Extinct flagships may
           fulfil this criterion by bridging the fate of the extinct species                     References
           to the required action to avert the loss of currently threa-                          A L A G O N A , P.S. () Biography of a “feathered pig”: the California
           tened species, thus informing a conservation agenda directed                             condor conservation controversy. Journal of the History of Biology,
           towards the management of threatened species.                                            , –.

           Oryx, 2017, 51(3), 471–476 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000041
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 03 May 2021 at 06:14:40, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000041
476         P. M. Kyne and V. M. Adams

             B E N N E T T , J.R., M A LO N E Y , R. & P O S S I N G H A M , H.P. () Biodiversity     L E T N I C , M., F I L L I O S , M. & C R O W T H E R , M.S. () Could direct
                 gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species                         killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine
                 conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, , http://dx.doi.                        from mainland Australia? PLoS ONE, (), e.
                 org/./rspb...                                                              P A D D L E , R. () The Last Tasmanian Tiger: The History and
             B LO C K S T E I N , D.E. & E VA N S , D.M. () A century later: lessons                      Extinction of the Thylacine. Cambridge University Press,
                 learned from the passenger pigeon. Frontiers in Ecology and the                              Cambridge, UK.
                 Environment, , .                                                                    P A D D L E , R. () The thylacine’s last straw: epidemic disease in a
             D O U G L A S , L.R. & W I N K E L , G. () The flipside of the flagship.                     recent mammalian extinction. Australian Zoologist, , –.
                 Biodiversity and Conservation, , –.                                              P R O J E C T P A S S E N G E R P I G E O N () Http://passengerpigeon.org/
             D U R R E L L W I L D L I F E C O N S E R VAT I O N T R U S T (undated) Https://www.             [accessed  March ].
                 durrell.org/wildlife/ [accessed  March ].                                           R O B E R T S , D.L. & S O LOW , A.R. () Flightless birds: when did the
             F I L L I O S , M., C R O W T H E R , M.S. & L E T N I C , M. () The impact of the           dodo become extinct? Nature, , .
                 dingo on the thylacine in Holocene Australia. World Archaeology,                         R O C K S T R Ö M , J., S T E F F E N , W., N O O N E , K., P E R S S O N , A., C H A P I N , III,
                 , –.                                                                                 F.S., L A M B I N , E.F. et al. () A safe operating space for humanity.
             H A L L I D AY , T.R. () The extinction of the passenger pigeon                              Nature, , –.
                 Ectopistes migratorius and its relevance to contemporary                                 R O G E R S , R.W. & M E W B O R N , C.R. () Fear appeals and attitude
                 conservation. Biological Conservation, , –.                                          change: effects of a threat’s noxiousness, probability of occurrence
             H E B E R L E , G. () Reports of alleged thylacine sightings in Western                      and the efficacy of coping responses. Journal of Personality and
                 Australia. Conservation Science Western Australia, , –.                                   Social Psychology, , –.
             H O F F M A N N , M., H I LT O N -T AY LO R , C., A N G U LO , A., B Ö H M , M.,             S A U E R , J.R., H I N E S , J.E., F A L LO N , J.E., P A R D I E C K , K.L., Z I O L KOW S K I ,
                 B R O O K S , T.M., B U T C H A R T , S.H.M. et al. () The impact of                     JR, D.J. & L I N K , W.A. () The North American Breeding Bird
                 conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science, ,                         Survey, Results and Analysis –. Version ... USGS
                 –.                                                                                   Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, USA.
             H U M E , J.P. () The history of the dodo Raphus cucullatus and the                      S M I T H , R.J., V E R Í S S I M O , D. & M AC M I L L A N , D.C. () Marketing
                 penguin of Mauritius. Historical Biology, , –.                                         and conservation: how to lose friends and influence people. In
             H U N G , C.-M., S H A N E R , P.-J.L., Z I N K , R.M., L I U , W.-C., C H U , T.-C.,            Trade-Offs in Conservation: Deciding What to Save (eds
                 H U A N G , W.-S. & L I , S.-H. () Drastic population fluctuations                       N. Leader-Williams, W.M. Adams & R.J. Smith), pp. –.
                 explain the rapid extinction of the passenger pigeon. Proceedings of                         Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, UK.
                 the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ,                   T U R N E R , S.S. () Negotiating nostalgia: the rhetoricity of thylacine
                 –.                                                                                 representation in Tasmanian tourism. Society & Animals, , –.
             IUCN () IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version ..                              V A S I , I.B. & M AC Y , M.W. () The mobilizer’s dilemma: crisis,
                 IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland, and                                    empowerment, and collective action. Social Forces, , –.
                 Cambridge, UK.                                                                           V E R Í S S I M O , D., M AC M I L L A N , D.C. & S M I T H , R.J. (a) Toward a
             IUCN (a) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v. ..                                  systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships.
                 Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed  May ].                                            Conservation Letters, , –.
             IUCN (b) IUCN Red List v. .: Table a: Status category                              V E R Í S S I M O , D., M AC M I L L A N , D.C. & S M I T H , R.J. (b) Marketing
                 summary by major taxonomic group (animals). Http://www.                                      diversity: a response to Joseph and colleagues. Conservation Letters,
                 iucnredlist.org/about/summary-statistics [accessed  May ].                              , –.
             IUCN S T A N D A R D S A N D P E T I T I O N S S U B C O M M I T T E E ()                V E R Í S S I M O , D., F R A S E R , I., G I R Ã O , W., C A M P O S , A.A., S M I T H , R.J. &
                 Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria.                              M AC M I L L A N , D.C. () Evaluating conservation flagships and
                 Version . IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland,                            flagship fleets. Conservation Letters, , –.
                 and Cambridge, UK.                                                                       W E I N S T E I N , N., R O G E R S O N , M., M O R E T O N , J., B A L M F O R D , A. &
             J E P S O N , P. & B A R U A , M. () A theory of flagship species action.                    B R A D B U R Y , R.B. () Conserving nature out of fear or knowledge?
                 Conservation and Society, , –.                                                        Using threatening versus connecting messages to generate support
             J O H N S O N , C. () Australia’s Mammal Extinctions: A , Year                          for environmental causes. Journal for Nature Conservation, ,
                 History. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, Australia.                                   –.
             J O N E S , C.G., H E C K , W., L E W I S , R.E., M U N G R O O , Y., S L A D E , G. &
                 C A D E , T. () The restoration of the Mauritius kestrel Falco
                 punctatus population. Ibis, , S–S.
             J O S E P H , L.N., M A LO N E Y , R.F., W AT S O N , J.E.M. & P O S S I N G H A M , H.P.    Biographical sketches
                 () Securing nonflagship species from extinction. Conservation
                 Letters, , –.                                                                     P E T E R K Y N E focuses on the collection of life history and ecological
             K A M P , J., O P P E L , S., A N A N I N , A.A., D U R N E V , Y.A., G A S H E V , S.N.,    information to guide the management and conservation of biodiversity
                 H Ö L Z E L , N. et al. () Global population collapse in a                           and assess population status and extinction risk. V A N E S S A A D A M S fo-
                 superabundant migratory bird and illegal trapping in China.                              cuses on the human dimensions of conservation and systematic envir-
                 Conservation Biology, , –.                                                     onmental decision making.

                                                                                               Oryx, 2017, 51(3), 471–476 © 2016 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605316000041
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 03 May 2021 at 06:14:40, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000041
You can also read