Folic acid supplementation, dietary folate intake during pregnancy and risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a prospective observational cohort study

Page created by Bruce Snyder
 
CONTINUE READING
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

 RESEARCH ARTICLE                                                                                                                                   Open Access

Folic acid supplementation, dietary folate intake
during pregnancy and risk for spontaneous
preterm delivery: a prospective observational
cohort study
Verena Sengpiel1*, Jonas Bacelis1, Ronny Myhre2, Solveig Myking2, Aase Serine Devold Pay3, Margaretha Haugen4,
Anne-Lise Brantsæter4, Helle Margrete Meltzer4, Roy Miodini Nilsen5, Per Magnus6, Stein Emil Vollset7,
Staffan Nilsson8 and Bo Jacobsson1,2

  Abstract
  Background: Health authorities in numerous countries recommend periconceptional folic acid supplementation to
  prevent neural tube defects. The objective of this study was to examine the association of dietary folate intake and
  folic acid supplementation during different periods of pregnancy with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery
  (PTD).
  Methods: The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study is a population-based prospective cohort study. A total
  of 66,014 women with singleton pregnancies resulting in live births in 2002–2009 were included. Folic acid
  supplementation was self-reported from 26 weeks before pregnancy until pregnancy week 24. At gestational week
  22, the women completed a food frequency questionnaire, which allowed the calculation of their average total
  folate intake from foods and supplements for the first 4–5 months of pregnancy. Spontaneous PTD was defined as
  the spontaneous onset of delivery between weeks 22+0 and 36+6 (n = 1,755).
  Results: The median total folate intake was 313 μg/d (interquartile range IQR 167–558) in the overall population
  and 530 μg/d (IQR 355–636) in the supplement users. Eighty-five percent reported any folic acid supplementation
  from
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                     Page 2 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

Background                                                   effect of the maternal folate status on the gestational
Folate is a B-vitamin essential for one-carbon metabol-      length or the risk of spontaneous PTD [23-25]. The
ism and takes part in amino acid metabolism as well as       comparability and generalizability of these earlier stud-
DNA synthesis, repair and methylation [1,2]. Women           ies, which focused on the association of folate status
are especially susceptible to folate deficiency during       and folic acid supplementation with pregnancy out-
pregnancy, which is a period of rapid fetal growth, organ    come, is limited because folic acid supplementation was
differentiation and high rates of cell division [1,3,4].     assessed without considering other folate sources, the
Since the 1950s, folic acid supplementation has been         study populations had different levels of dietary folate
known to prevent megaloblastic anemia during preg-           intake, inadequate sample sizes, limited adjustment for
nancy [5]. In the 1990s, large randomized trials demon-      important confounders, and/or retrospective study de-
strated that periconceptional folic acid supplementation     signs with folate data collection only after delivery [1,4].
can prevent neural tube defects (NTDs) in the newborn        Although PTD is a heterogeneous pregnancy outcome
infant [6-8]. Today, national health authorities in many     with different etiologies (early vs. late or iatrogenic vs.
countries recommend periconceptional folic acid sup-         spontaneous), previous studies have mostly treated PTD as
plementation, and some countries have introduced             one entity, obscuring the differences in risk among PTD
mandatory folate fortification of foods [1,3,4,9,10]. In     subtypes [26,27].
Norway, folic acid supplementation of 400 μg/d is rec-          The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa)
ommended from the time of planning a pregnancy to            can meet a number of these challenges in study design, a
gestational week 12 [2,11], as is a daily folate intake of   requirement for addressing the inconsistencies in the field.
500 μg/d. This is in line with the Nordic Nutrition Rec-     MoBa includes more than 106,000 pregnancies, enabling
ommendations [2].                                            the investigation of common complex pregnancy out-
  Maternal folate status has also been associated with       comes such as PTD. A detailed prospective assessment of
other adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclamp-          folic acid supplementation starting from 6 months before
sia, malformations such as orofacial clefts, spontaneous     conception throughout pregnancy, data regarding dietary
abortion, fetal death, fetal growth restriction and pre-     folate intake and comprehensive information about life-
term delivery (PTD), although these results still remain     style habits, health and socioeconomic status provide a
inconclusive [1].                                            unique opportunity to study the association between folate
  PTD, defined by the World Health Organization              intake and PTD. For example, the effect of folic acid sup-
(WHO) as birth occurring before 37 weeks of gestation,       plementation can be compared between women with low
is considered a major global health problem and is           and high dietary folate intakes. By taking into account the
strongly associated with neonatal mortality as well as       amount of dietary folate and folic acid supplementation
short- and long-term morbidity [12-14]. Spontaneous          during different periods of pregnancy, it might be possible
PTD is a common, complex condition with a prevalence         to define the folic acid supplementation scheme most
of approximately 7% in the Norwegian population [15].        likely to affect PTD risk.
However, the effect of any single environmental factor          The aim of this study was to examine the association
is difficult to measure without large-scale studies [15].    of maternal folate intake from both supplemental and
Modern obstetrics are still not able to predict, prevent     dietary sources with the risk of spontaneous PTD, with
or treat PTD [16]. Progesterone substitution, the only       sub-analyses of early and late spontaneous PTD. The as-
promising intervention identified to date, has been shown    sociation of folic acid supplementation with PTD was
to reduce the chance of spontaneous PTD in high-risk         studied in a stratified sample of women with low and
pregnancies, but such cases account for only a small pro-    high dietary folate intakes (
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                     Page 3 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

status, lifestyle behavior and diet at gestational weeks     sold in Norway were registered based on information
15–17 (Q1) and 30 (Q3). At week 22, they completed a         provided by the respective manufacturer, whereas nutri-
food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). All questionnaires       tional information concerning dietary supplements bought
are available from the homepage of the Norwegian Insti-      from the Internet or abroad were obtained from the man-
tute of Public Health [28]. The present study used data      ufacturer’s or supplier’s homepage. A data program con-
from version 6 of the quality-assured data files made        nected to the Access database read all food supplements
available for research in 2011. The MoBa database is         recorded by the MoBa participants. The process of extract-
linked to pregnancy and birth records from the Medical       ing dietary and supplement data is described in detail else-
Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) [29]. Informed written       where [33,34].
consent was obtained from each participant. The Regional        Dietary folate was defined as 60% of the reported fol-
Committee for Medical Research and the Norwegian Data        ate intake from foods, as only approximately 60% may
Inspectorate approved the study.                             be biologically accessible in comparison to that from
   Of 106,707 pregnancies included in the MoBa version       the synthetic folic acid in supplements [1,3]. The total
6, 103,921 pregnancies resulted in live-born singletons.     folate intake was thus calculated as supplemental folic
Complete data for all 3 questionnaires including infor-      acid +0.6 × folate intake from foods.
mation about folate intake were available for 81,329            The daily folate intake was also categorized into 4
pregnancies. Women reporting improbable energy in-           groups: 1000 μg/d.
were included in the study. Pregnancies with a gestational
length of 42+6 weeks were excluded from fur-       Timing of folic acid supplementation
ther analysis, leaving 75,873 remaining. If a woman par-     The women reported their folic acid supplement use
ticipated for more than one pregnancy, only her first        from 26 weeks before conception until gestational week
pregnancy enrolled was included, leaving 66,014 preg-        24 in 4-week intervals, including the frequency of
nancies for analyses.                                        supplementation. A woman was defined as a folic acid
                                                             supplement user if she reported any use of folic acid –
Outcome                                                      containing supplements for more than once a week in a
The gestational age in days was determined with a            registered 4-week period. Folic acid may be consumed
second-trimester ultrasound in 98.4% of the pregnancies      either in the form of a folic acid supplement alone or as
and was based on the last menstrual period in the            part of multivitamins. The most commonly used folic
remaining cases. Spontaneous PTD was defined as birth        acid supplements for pregnant women in Norway con-
after preterm labor or pre-labor rupture of the mem-         tain 400 μg of folic acid, while the most commonly used
branes between 22+0 and 36+6 weeks. To distinguish be-       multivitamin supplements contain 200 μg of folic acid.
tween early and late spontaneous PTDs, we used the           For this study, the start of folic acid supplementation
following gestational time-windows: early (22+0-33+6)        was categorized as start during 26–9 weeks before con-
and late (34+0-36+6) PTD.                                    ception, start during 8–0 weeks before conception, and
                                                             no preconceptional folic acid supplementation.
Exposure
Amount of folate intake                                      Covariates
The amount of folate intake was calculated from the          Covariates were chosen a priori based on the available
MoBa FFQ, a semi-quantitative questionnaire designed         literature. Information regarding the maternal age at de-
to yield information regarding the dietary habits and in-    livery as well as the child’s sex is available from the
take of dietary supplements during the first 5 months of     MBRN. Parity was based on data from both the MoBa
pregnancy. The questionnaire data were read optically,       and MBRN and based on the number of previous preg-
and the nutrient and energy intakes were calculated          nancies of ≥22+0 weeks’ duration. Marital status was
using FoodCalc [31] and the Norwegian Food Compos-           defined as either married/cohabitant or not. The self-
ition Table [32]. For the calculation of nutrients in the    reported pre-pregnancy heights and weights were used
dietary supplements, an Access database containing the       to calculate the pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI)
nutrient values of more than 1,000 dietary supplements       and were grouped according to the WHO classification
was created and continuously updated using Microsoft         as underweight (
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                     Page 4 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

Maternal education was categorized as ≤12 y, 13–16 y        had higher education levels and family incomes. Women
and ≥17 y. The history of previous PTD before 37+0 weeks    having experienced PTD had significantly lower total fol-
of gestation, and the history of spontaneous abortion, as   ate intakes. While women with a history of spontaneous
registered in the MBRN, were taken into account as di-      abortion had more often started folic acid supplementa-
chotomous variables in regression models. Women re-         tion early, no comparable pattern in women with a his-
ported smoking habits during pregnancy in Q1 and            tory of PTD was found (Table 1).
were categorized as non-smokers, occasional or daily           Figure 1 illustrates the pattern of folic acid supplementa-
smokers. The alcohol intake from different sources was      tion in the study population compared to vitamin A supple-
self-reported in the FFQ (glasses/d, week or month) and     mentation (as a proxy for multivitamin consumption) over
calculated as g/d. The household income was classified as   the course of pregnancy. 85% of all women in the study re-
both the participant and her partner having 5000 μg/d, 610
multivitamin preparations. In MoBa more than 99% of the     consuming >1000 μg/d (1%), 6,834 consuming >500 μg/d
participants are of Caucasian ethnicity; hence, ethnicity   (10%), 10,681 consuming >400 μg/d (16%), 27,183 consum-
was not a relevant confounder.                              ing >200 μg/d (41%) and 34,234 consuming >100 μg/d
                                                            (52%). Among supplement users, the median daily folic acid
Statistical methods                                         supplementation was 400 μg/d (interquartile range IQR
All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS      200–429). As presented in Table 2, folic acid from supple-
Statistics 22 and R 2.13.1 software. Total dietary folate   ments was the main folate source in supplement users,
intake from foods and supplements (median (IQR)) in         while the main source was dietary folate in the whole popu-
relation to the maternal characteristics was studied with   lation. There is no mandatory folate fortification of foods in
the Kruskal-Wallis test. The start of folic acid supple-    Norway, and only 3% (n = 1,946, not adjusted for bioavail-
mentation in relation to the maternal characteristics was   ability) of the study population reached the Nordic Nutri-
studied with Pearson’s chi-squared test. The association    tion Recommendation of 500 μg/d with their dietary folate
of total dietary folate intake and spontaneous PTD was      intake. Of the study participants, 44% (n = 28,959, not ad-
estimated as a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence      justed for bioavailability) achieved the recommended levels
interval (CI) by using Cox regression both in an un-        with their total folate intake.
adjusted model and adjusted for the above-mentioned
covariates. In these models, the event was defined as a     Folate intake from different sources and risk for
spontaneous PTD; all iatrogenic deliveries and deliver-     spontaneous PTD
ies after the preterm (≥37+0 weeks) or early preterm        The median gestational age in this study population was
(≥34+0 weeks) period were censored. The proportional        281 days (IQR 274–287), with 2,906 (4%) cases of PTD
hazards assumption was investigated by testing and          and 1,755 cases of spontaneous PTD (2.7%). Of these,
inspecting scaled Schoenfeld residuals using R function     334 babies were delivered before 34+0 weeks of gestation
cox.zph [36]. Statistical significance was assumed for 2-   (0.5%). Thus the overall PTD rate in our study popula-
sided p-values of
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                                                               Page 5 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

Table 1 Folate variables and maternal characteristics
                                                                 Total folate intake (μg/d)   Initiation of preconceptional folic acid supplementation, n (%)
                                                 n       (%)     Median (IQR)      p1         >8 w                0-8 w               No                   p2
Total                                            66014   (100)   313   (167–558)              16023      (24)     12877      (20)     37114      (56)
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                                  Page 6 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

categorized according to the former WHO recom-                              A history of earlier adverse pregnancy outcome could
mendation for women (>170 μg/d), the current Nordic                       be a motive for the early initiation of folic acid supple-
Nutrition Recommendations for pregnant women                              mentation in subsequent pregnancies. However, the ana-
(>500 μg/d) and the tolerable upper limit (for folic acid                 lysis of the subgroup of women being pregnant the first
supplementation:
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                                                                  Page 7 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

Table 2 Folate intake from diet and supplements
                               All                                      Spontaneous delivery 37+0- 42+6                         Spontaneous PTD 22+0-36+6
Folate (μg/d)                  Median              IQR                  Median                     IQR                          Median                   IQR
All women                      n = 66014                                n = 51141                                               n = 1755
Diet                           157                 (126–196)            157                        (126–196)                    157                      (126–196)
Supplements                    143                 (0–400)              143                        (0–400)                      171                      (0–400)
Total intake                   313                 (167–558)            312                        (167–558)                    322                      (167–568)
Supplement users               n = 39600                                n = 30684                                               n = 1056
Diet                           158                 (127–197)            158                        (127–197)                    159                      (128–198)
Supplements                    400                 (200–429)            400                        (200–429)                    400                      (200–457)
Total intake                   530                 (355–636)            530                        (355–634)                    541                      (369–651)
Folic acid supplementation, dietary and total folate intake during the first half of pregnancy (FFQ data) for all 66,014 participants, as well as in folic acid
supplement users (n = 39,600), from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (2002–2009).

supplementation on the spontaneous PTD risk, support a                                 1 year or longer [21] or third-trimester folic acid supple-
number of earlier observational studies [38-43] and RCTs                               mentation [22], raising questions about extended supple-
[6,44,45]. A reanalysis of a previous Cochrane review, and                             mentation schemes compared to the NTD prevention
one of the largest RCTs, a recent meta-analysis of all RCTs                            scheme. Folic acid supplementation more than a 1 year be-
published to date as well as the most recent Cochrane re-                              fore becoming pregnant is not registered in MoBa, but
view based on 3 available trials, showed no association of                             data for the earliest interval (26–9 weeks before concep-
the maternal folate status with the gestational length or                              tion) suggest an adverse effect of longtime folic acid sup-
the risk of PTD [23-25]. Extensive supplementation with                                plementation on the risk of spontaneous PTD. Though
multivitamins with a major folic acid component was asso-                              third trimester folic acid supplementation is registered in
ciated with an increased risk of PTD in a study by Alwan                               MoBa, we chose to not include third trimester supplemen-
et al. [38]. When analyzing data from the US National                                  tation as the early PTDs already have occurred at different
Birth Defects Study, Shaw et al. found a lower risk of PTD                             time points during this period, so that we were not able to
for women starting supplementation during pregnancy as                                 retrace the findings by Czeizel et al. [22].
compared to preconceptional supplementation start [43].                                   One possible explanation for these conflicting results
   However, results are conflicting as summarized in the                               could be the dosage of folic acid. While most of the
review by Mantovani et al. [27]. A protective effect of                                studies finding an association with gestational length or
folic acid supplementation was supported by a modest                                   PTD were based on high doses of folic acid (≥5000 μg/d
reduction in the PTD rate after the introduction of folate                             [20,22,46], ≥2500 μg/d [22,47] and ≥500 μg/d [48-50]),
fortification of foods [9]. Some recent observational studies                          only 2 women in our study population consumed as
have found that folic acid supplementation reduces the                                 much as 5000 μg/d of supplemental folic acid, while only
risk of PTD [20-22]. In some cases, this association was                               10% consumed >500 μg/d and 16% consumed >400 μg/
found for preconceptional folic acid supplementation for                               d. However, the Hungarian RCT, one of the biggest per-
                                                                                       formed so far, did not find any effect of a high dosage of
Table 3 Folate intake from different sources and risk of                               800 μg/d of periconceptional folic acid supplementation
spontaneous preterm delivery (PTD)                                                     on PTD [6]. Unfortunately, the folic acid dosage was not
                    Unadjusted                       Adjusted2                         indicated in all of the studies [21,37].
Folate (μg/d)       HR 1
                            (95% CI)        p        HR1       (95% CI)       p
                                                                                          The assessment of folate intake from supplementation
                                                                                       alone or when studying populations with different dietary
Diet                1.00    (0.61; 1.65)    0.61     1.00      (0.61; 1.65)   0.54
                                                                                       folate intakes are additional factors compromising com-
Supplements         1.00    (1.00; 1.00)    0.25     1.00      (1.00; 1.00)   0.53
                                                                                       parability between studies. While recent US studies are
Total intake        1.00    (1.00; 1.00)    0.22     1.00      (1.00; 1.00)   0.46     performed against the background of mandatory folate for-
Amount of folic acid supplementation, dietary and total folate intake (FFQ             tification of food [21,43], other studies have examined sup-
data) and hazard ratios for spontaneous PTD (22+0-36+6 weeks, n = 1,755). Cox
regression for 66,014 participants in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort
                                                                                       plementation effects in folate-deficient populations [46].
Study (2002–2009). Iatrogenic deliveries have been censored in the                     Few studies have assessed the effects of both dietary folate
regression model.                                                                      and folic acid supplementation separately [43] or com-
1
 HR per 500 μg extra folate/d.
2
 Cox regression, adjusted for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, parity, history          bined [20,49,51], and adjustments for bioavailability are
of PTD and spontaneous abortion, child’s sex, smoking habits and alcohol               rare. In this Norwegian study population, only 3% of
consumption during pregnancy, maternal education, marital status, household
income, energy intake. Mutual adjustment for dietary and supplemental
                                                                                       the participants reached the Nordic Nutrition Recom-
folate intake.                                                                         mendation of 500 μg/d with their dietary folate intake,
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                                                                 Page 8 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

Table 4 Initiation of preconceptional folic acid supplementation and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD)
sPTD     Initiation of folic acid supplementation                   Unadjusted                     Adjusted1                           Adjusted2
                                                          n         HR     (CI)           p        HR      (CI)           p            HR          (CI)           p
All      No                                               964       1                              1                                   1
         0-8 w preconception                              313       0.93   (0.82; 1.06)   0.28     0.99    (0.87; 1.13)   0.89         1.01        (0.88; 1.16)   0.88
         >8 w preconception                               478       1.15   (1.03; 1.29)   0.01     1.18    (1.05; 1.32)   0.005        1.20        (1.06; 1.36)   0.004
Early    No                                               169       1                              1                                   1
         0-8 w preconception                              57        0.97   (0.72; 1.31)   0.84     1.07    (0.79; 1.45)   0.67         1.04        (0.76; 1.43)   0.81
         >8 w preconception                               108       1.48   (1.16; 1.89)   0.001    1.60    (1.24; 2.06)   8 w preconception                               370       1.08   (0.96; 1.22)   0.22     1.09    (0.96; 1.24)   0.19         1.12        (0.98; 1.29)   0.11
                                                                                                                                 +0   +6
Initiation of preconceptional folic acid supplementation (Q1 data) and hazard ratios (HR) for spontaneous PTD (n = 1,755 for 22 -36 weeks, n = 334 for early
(22+0-33+6 weeks), n = 1,421 for late (34+0-36+6 weeks)). Cox regression for 66,014 participants in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (2002 – 2009).
Iatrogenic deliveries have been censored in the regression model.
1
 Cox regression, adjusted for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, parity, history of PTD and spontaneous abortion, child’s sex, smoking habits and alcohol
consumption during pregnancy, maternal education, marital status, household income, energy intake and dietary folate intake.
2
 Adjustment as above as well as for first-trimester folic acid supplementation and preconceptional and first-trimester vitamin A supplementation.

and 44% of the participants achieved the recommended                                is well established that women with high levels of educa-
level with their dietary folate and supplemental folic                              tion, privileged socioeconomic status and healthier overall
acid intake. After stratification for dietary folate intake,                        diets are more likely to use supplements during pregnancy
the early initiation of folic acid supplementation was                              [52-54] and less likely to experience PTD than women
significantly associated with spontaneous PTD in the                                without these characteristics. Some observational studies
subgroup of women with low but not high dietary folate                              failed to adjust for these confounders, and the effect at-
intakes. There were no significant associations between                             tributed to folic acid supplementation might in fact be
high total folate intakes and PTD risk in the MoBa                                  confounded by overall health and lifestyle behaviors. While
study population.                                                                   the strength of the significance was moderate, the asso-
  In observational studies, confounding is always an issue                          ciation with the early onset of folic acid supplementa-
when assessing the association of a single environmental                            tion in the current study remained significant even
factor with a complex outcome like PTD. For example, it                             after adjustment for maternal characteristics such as

Table 5 Timing of folic acid supplementation and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery (PTD)
              Time of folic acid supplementation                sPTD         Unadjusted                                    Adjusted1
                                                                n            HR           (CI)               p             HR               (CI)                  p
All           >8 w preconception                                478          1.17         (1.06; 1.30)       0.003         1.17             (1.04; 1.32)          0.01
              0-8 w preconception                               648          1.01         (0.92; 1.12)       0.80          1.01             (0.90; 1.13)          0.84
              1st trimester                                     1326         0.94         (0.84; 1.05)       0.26          0.89             (0.79; 1.00)          0.05
              2nd trimester                                     869          1.10         (1.00; 1.21)       0.04          1.08             (0.98; 1.19)          0.11
Early         >8 w preconception                                108          1.49         (1.19; 1.88)       0.001         1.51             (1.16; 1.97)          0.002
              0-8 w preconception                               133          1.15         (0.92; 1.43)       0.23          1.03             (0.80; 1.34)          0.81
              1st trimester                                     262          1.11         (0.85; 1.44)       0.45          0.99             (0.74; 1.32)          0.95
              2nd trimester                                     173          1.21         (0.97; 1.49)       0.09          1.12             (0.89; 1.39)          0.34
Late          >8 w preconception                                370          1.10         (0.98; 1.24)       0.10          1.10             (0.97; 1.26)          0.15
              0-8 w preconception                               515          0.98         (0.88; 1.09)       0.69          1.00             (0.88; 1.13)          0.94
              1st trimester                                     1064         0.91         (0.81; 1.03)       0.13          0.87             (0.76; 1.00)          0.04
              2nd trimester                                     696          1.08         (0.98; 1.20)       0.13          1.08             (0.97; 1.20)          0.17
Folic acid supplementation at different times (Q1 and Q3 data) and hazard ratios (HR) for spontaneous PTD (n = 1.755 for 22+0-36+6 weeks, n = 334 for early
(22+0-33+6 weeks), n = 1,421 for late (34+0-36+6 weeks)) as compared to no intake at that time of pregnancy. Cox regression for 66,014 participants in the
Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (2002 – 2009). Iatrogenic deliveries have been censored in the regression model.
1
 Cox regression, adjusted for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, parity, history of PTD and spontaneous abortion, child’s sex, smoking habits and alcohol
consumption during pregnancy, maternal education, marital status, household income, energy intake and dietary folate intake. Mutual adjustment for folic acid
supplementation at other time points.
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                          Page 9 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

socioeconomic and life-style parameters as well as ob-            Strengths and weaknesses
stetric anamnesis.                                                With a sample size of 66,014 pregnancies, this was a well-
   Associations with the early start of supplementation           powered study for investigating the association of folate in-
should be studied with particular caution. The early start        take and spontaneous PTD. Due to the large study sample,
of folic acid supplementation might partially identify a          there were 1,755 cases defined as spontaneous PTD and
group of women with a history of adverse pregnancy out-           334 and 1,421 cases in the subgroups of early and late
comes who want to optimize conditions for their current           spontaneous PTD, respectively. The estimation of the ges-
pregnancy. As presented in Table 1, women who had pre-            tational length by the second-trimester ultrasounds and
viously experienced spontaneous abortions were more               the definition of a clear PTD phenotype – spontaneous on-
likely to initiate folic acid supplementation early in their      set of delivery between 22+0 and 36+6 weeks of gestation -
subsequent pregnancies. However, the same association of          distinguish this study.
the early initiation of folic acid supplementation and spon-        The MoBa participation rate is 38.5%, and a demo-
taneous PTD was found in women being pregnant the first           graphic comparison with the MBRN in 2002 showed
time. Folic acid supplementation starting more than               that single women and women
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                                                       Page 10 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

157 μg/d corrected for bio-availability, uncorrected                           Statement of financial support: This work was supported by grants from the
262 μg/d) and supplemental folic acid (median 143 μg/d)                        Norwegian Research Council (FUGE 183220/S10, FRIMEDKLI-05 ES236011), the
                                                                               Swedish Medical Society (SLS 2008–21198) and Swedish government grants to
in this healthy study population.                                              researchers in public health service (ALFGBG-2863, ALFGBG-11522, ALF-ST
  The initiation of folic acid supplementation more than                       FoUU/Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg), Stiftelsen Sigurd och
8 weeks prior to conception was associated with an in-                         Elsa Goljes Minne (LA2011-0489). The funders had no role in study design,
                                                                               data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the
creased risk for overall and early spontaneous PTD in                          manuscript.
both the overall analyses and in the strata of women
with low dietary folate intake.                                                Author details
                                                                               1
                                                                                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska Academy,
  Even if MoBa allows adjustment for a variety of con-                         Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Göteborg SE-416 85, Sweden.
founders, the presence of residual confounding cannot                          2
                                                                                Department of Genes and Environment, Division of Epidemiology,
be ruled out. Furthermore, our results require careful in-                     Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Nydalen, P.O. Box 4404, Oslo NO-0403,
                                                                               Norway. 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children’s
vestigation regarding dosage and timing of folic acid                          Division, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, P.O. Box 4950, Oslo NO-0424,
supplementation, such as in the form of an RCT, before                         Norway. 4Department of Exposure and Risk Assessment, Division of
discussing a change of the current guidelines.                                 Environmental Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Nydalen, P.O.
                                                                               Box 4403, Oslo NO-0403, Norway. 5Department of Global Public Health and
                                                                               Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen NO-5018, Norway. 6Division of
Additional files                                                               Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4403, Oslo
                                                                               NO-0403, Norway. 7Norwegian Institute of Public Health and University of
                                                                               Bergen, Kalfarveien 31, Bergen NO-5018, Norway. 8Mathematical Sciences,
 Additional file 1: Table S1. Folate intake according to official              Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden.
 recommendations and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery (PTD).
 Additional file 2: Figure S1a. Initiation of preconceptional folic acid       Received: 6 June 2014 Accepted: 16 October 2014
 supplementation and risk of spontaneous PTD. Initiation of
 preconceptional folic acid supplementation (Q1 data) and cumulative risk
 of spontaneous PTD (22+0-36+6 weeks, n = 1,755). Cox regression for
 66,014 participants in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study            References
 (2002 – 2009), adjusted for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, parity,           1. Tamura T, Picciano MF: Folate and human reproduction. Am J Clin Nutr
 history of PTD and spontaneous abortion, child’s sex, smoking habits and          2006, 83(5):993–1016.
 alcohol consumption during pregnancy, maternal education, marital             2. Nordic Council of Ministers: Folate. In Nordic Nutrition Recommendations
 status, household income, energy intake and dietary folate intake.                2004 Integrating nutrition and physical activity. Copenhagen: Norden;
 Iatrogenic deliveries have been censored in the regression model.                 2004:287–296.
 Additional file 3: Figure S1b. Initiation of preconceptional folic acid       3. World Health Organization; Food and Agricultural Organization of the
 supplementation and risk of early spontaneous PTD. Initiation of                  United Nations: Folate and Folic acid. In Vitamin and mineral requirements
 preconceptional folic acid supplementation (Q1 data) and cumulative risk          in human nutrition. Rome: FAO; 2004:53–62.
 of early spontaneous PTD (22+0-33+6 weeks, n = 334). Cox regression for       4. Scholl TO, Johnson WG: Folic acid: influence on the outcome of
 66,014 participants in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study                pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 2000, 71(5 Suppl):1295S–1303S.
 (2002 – 2009), adjusted for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, parity,           5. Israels MC, Da Cunha FA: Megaloblastic anaemia of pregnancy. Lancet
 history of PTD and spontaneous abortion, child’s sex, smoking habits and          1952, 2(6727):214–215.
 alcohol consumption during pregnancy, maternal education, marital             6. Czeizel AE, Dudas I, Metneki J: Pregnancy outcomes in a randomised
 status, household income, energy intake and dietary folate intake.                controlled trial of periconceptional multivitamin supplementation. Final
 Iatrogenic deliveries have been censored in the regression model.                 report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1994, 255(3):131–139.
 Additional file 4: Table S2. Initiation of preconceptional folic acid         7. Czeizel AE, Dudas I: Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube
 supplementation and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD),                  defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med 1992,
 depending on dietary folate intake.                                               327(26):1832–1835.
                                                                               8. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group: Prevention of neural tube defects:
                                                                                   results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. Lancet 1991,
Abbreviations                                                                      338(8760):131–137.
BMI: Body mass index; CI: Confidence interval; FFQ: Food frequency             9. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Nelson V, Selvin S, Schaffer DM: Occurrence of
questionnaire; HR: Hazard ratio; IQR: Interquartile range; MoBa: The               low birthweight and preterm delivery among California infants before
Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study; MBRN: Medical birth registry of           and after compulsory food fortification with folic acid. Public Health Rep
Norway; NOK: Norwegian crowns, currency; NTD: Neural tube defect;                  2004, 119(2):170–173.
PTD: Preterm delivery; Q1: Q3, Questionnaire 1, 3; RCT: Randomized             10. De Bree A, Van Dusseldorp M, Brouwer IA, van het Hof KH, Steegers-
controlled trial; WHO: World health organization.                                  Theunissen RP: Folate intake in Europe: recommended, actual and
                                                                                   desired intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997, 51(10):643–660.
                                                                               11. Kostholdsråd gravide (Dietary recommendation for pregnant women, in
Competing interests
                                                                                   Norwegian) [http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/folkehelse/ernering/kostholdsrad/
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
                                                                                   gravide/Sider/default.aspx]
                                                                               12. WHO Expert Committee: The prevention of perinatal mortality and
Authors’ contributions                                                             morbidity. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech
All authors planned the study. VS, JB and SN analyzed the data. VS, RM, SM,        Rep Ser 1970, 457:1–60.
BJ selected preterm deliveries. MH calculated on folate intake from Q2. All    13. Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T: Long-term medical and social
authors contributed with interpretation of results and writing of the paper.       consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2008, 359(3):262–273.
All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.                       14. Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, Black RE: WHO estimates of the causes
                                                                                   of death in children. Lancet 2005, 365(9465):1147–1152.
Acknowledgments                                                                15. Magnus P, Irgens LM, Haug K, Nystad W, Skjaerven R, Stoltenberg C: Cohort
We are grateful to all families in Norway who are participating in this            profile: the Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa). Int J
ongoing cohort study.                                                              Epidemiol 2006, 35(5):1146–1150.
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                                                            Page 11 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

16. Lockwood CJ: Predicting premature delivery–no easy task. N Engl J Med                 Report). Rome, Lanham, MD: Food and Agriculture Organization of the
    2002, 346(4):282–284.                                                                 United Nations; 1988.
17. Dodd JM, Flenady VJ, Cincotta R, Crowther CA: Progesterone for the              36.   Grambsch PM, Therneau TM: Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics
    prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2008,                based on weighted residualsProportional hazards tests and diagnostics
    112(1):127–134.                                                                       based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994, 81:515–526.
18. Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, Tabor A, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz          37.   Callaway L, Colditz PB, Fisk NM: Folic acid supplementation and spontaneous
    E, Da Fonseca E, Creasy GW, Klein K, Rode L, Soma-Pillay P, Fusey S, Cam              preterm birth: adding grist to the mill? PLoS Med 2009, 6(5):e1000077.
    C, Alfirevic Z, Hassan SS: Vaginal progesterone in women with an                38.   Alwan NA, Greenwood DC, Simpson NA, McArdle HJ, Cade JE: The relationship
    asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases                   between dietary supplement use in late pregnancy and birth outcomes: a
    preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and                      cohort study in British women. BJOG 2010, 117(7):821–829.
    metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012,              39.   Catov JM, Bodnar LM, Olsen J, Olsen S, Nohr EA: Periconceptional
    206(2):124 e121–119.                                                                  multivitamin use and risk of preterm or small-for-gestational-age
19. Li Z, Ye R, Zhang L, Li H, Liu J, Ren A: Periconceptional folic acid                  births in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2011,
    supplementation and the risk of preterm births in China: a large                      94(3):906–912.
    prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2014, 43(4):1132–1139.                40.   Nilsen RM, Vollset SE, Monsen AL, Ulvik A, Haugen M, Meltzer HM, Magnus
20. Papadopoulou E, Stratakis N, Roumeliotaki T, Sarri K, Merlo DF, Kogevinas M,          P, Ueland PM: Infant birth size is not associated with maternal intake and
    Chatzi L: The effect of high doses of folic acid and iron supplementation             status of folate during the second trimester in Norwegian pregnant
    in early-to-mid pregnancy on prematurity and fetal growth retardation:                women. J Nutr 2010, 140(3):572–579.
    the mother-child cohort study in Crete, Greece (Rhea study). Eur J Nutr         41.   Timmermans S, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Steegers
    2013, 52(1):327–336.                                                                  EA: Periconception folic acid supplementation, fetal growth and the risks
21. Bukowski R, Malone FD, Porter FT, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Hankins GD,                 of low birth weight and preterm birth: the Generation R Study. Br J Nutr
    Eddleman K, Gross SJ, Dugoff L, Craigo SD, Timor-Tritsch IE, Carr SR, Wolfe           2009, 102(5):777–785.
    HM, D'Alton ME: Preconceptional folate supplementation and the                  42.   Dunlop AL, Taylor RN, Tangpricha V, Fortunato S, Menon R: Maternal
    risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a cohort study. PLoS Med 2009,                     micronutrient status and preterm versus term birth for black and white
    6(5):e1000061.                                                                        US women. Reprod Sci 2012, 19(9):939–948.
22. Czeizel AE, Puho EH, Langmar Z, Acs N, Banhidy F: Possible association of       43.   Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Yang W, Siega-Riz AM: Periconceptional intake of
    folic acid supplementation during pregnancy with reduction of preterm                 folic acid and food folate and risks of preterm delivery. Am J Perinatol
    birth: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010,               2011, 28(10):747–752.
    148(2):135–140.                                                                 44.   Fleming AF, Martin JD, Stenhouse NS: Pregnancy anaemia, iron and folate
23. Lassi ZS, Salam RA, Haider BA, Bhutta ZA: Folic acid supplementation                  deficiency in Western Australia. Med J Aust 1974, 2(13):479–484.
    during pregnancy for maternal health and pregnancy outcomes.                    45.   Fletcher J, Gurr A, Fellingham FR, Prankerd TA, Brant HA, Menzies DN: The
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 3:CD006896.                                          value of folic acid supplements in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br
24. Charles DH, Ness AR, Campbell D, Smith GD, Whitley E, Hall MH: Folic acid             Commonw 1971, 78(9):781–785.
    supplements in pregnancy and birth outcome: re-analysis of a large              46.   Baumslag N, Edelstein T, Metz J: Reduction of incidence of prematurity by
    randomised controlled trial and update of Cochrane review. Paediatr                   folic acid supplementation in pregnancy. Br Med J 1970, 1(5687):16–17.
    Perinat Epidemiol 2005, 19(2):112–124.                                          47.   Rolschau J, Kristoffersen K, Ulrich M, Grinsted P, Schaumburg E, Foged N:
25. Fekete K, Berti C, Trovato M, Lohner S, Dullemeijer C, Souverein OW, Cetin I,         The influence of folic acid supplement on the outcome of pregnancies
    Decsi T: Effect of folate intake on health outcomes in pregnancy: a                   in the county of Funen in Denmark. Part I. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
    systematic review and meta-analysis on birth weight, placental weight                 1999, 87(2):105–110. discussion 103–104.
    and length of gestation. Nutr J 2012, 11(1):75.                                 48.   Scholl TO, Hediger ML, Bendich A, Schall JI, Smith WK, Krueger PM: Use of
26. Pennell CE, Jacobsson B, Williams SM, Buus RM, Muglia LJ, Dolan SM,                   multivitamin/mineral prenatal supplements: influence on the outcome
    Morken NH, Ozcelik H, Lye SJ, Relton C: Genetic epidemiologic studies of              of pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 1997, 146(2):134–141.
    preterm birth: guidelines for research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007,               49.   Siega-Riz AM, Savitz DA, Zeisel SH, Thorp JM, Herring A: Second trimester
    196(2):107–118.                                                                       folate status and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191(6):1851–1857.
27. Mantovani E, Filippini F, Bortolus R, Franchi M: Folic acid supplementation     50.   Furness DL, Yasin N, Dekker GA, Thompson SD, Roberts CT: Maternal red
    and preterm birth: results from observational studies. Biomed Res Int                 blood cell folate concentration at 10–12 weeks gestation and pregnancy
    2014, 2014:481914.                                                                    outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012, 25(8):1423–1427.
28. Norwegian Mother and Child Study. [http://www.fhi.no/eway/default.aspx?         51.   Scholl TO, Hediger ML, Schall JI, Khoo CS, Fischer RL: Dietary and serum
    pid=240&trg=Main_6664&Main_6664=6894:0:25,7372:1:0:0:::0:0]                           folate: their influence on the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 1996,
29. Irgens LM: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Epidemiological                      63(4):520–525.
    research and surveillance throughout 30 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        52.   Bailey RL, Dodd KW, Gahche JJ, Dwyer JT, McDowell MA, Yetley EA, Sempos
    2000, 79(6):435–439.                                                                  CA, Burt VL, Radimer KL, Picciano MF: Total folate and folic acid intake
30. Meltzer HM, Brantsaeter AL, Ydersbond TA, Alexander J, Haugen M:                      from foods and dietary supplements in the United States: 2003–2006.
    Methodological challenges when monitoring the diet of pregnant                        Am J Clin Nutr 2010, 91(1):231–237.
    women in a large study: experiences from the Norwegian Mother and               53.   Nilsen RM, Vollset SE, Gjessing HK, Magnus P, Meltzer HM, Haugen M,
    Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Matern Child Nutr 2008, 4(1):14–27.                        Ueland PM: Patterns and predictors of folic acid supplement use among
31. FoodCalc. [http://www.ibt.ku.dk/jesper/FoodCalc/Default.htm]                          pregnant women: the Norwegian mother and child cohort study. Am J
32. Rimestad AH, Borgejordet A, Vesterhus KN, Sygnestveit K, Løken EB, Trygg K,           Clin Nutr 2006, 84(5):1134–1141.
    Pollestad ML, Lund-Larsen K, Omholt-Jensen G, Nordbotten A: Matvaretabellen     54.   Nilsen RM, Mastroiacovo P, Gunnes N, Alsaker ER, Bjorke-Monsen AL, Eussen
    (The Norwegian Food Table, in Norwegian). University of Oslo: Norwegian Food          SJ, Haugen M, Johannessen A, Meltzer HM, Stoltenberg C, Ueland PM,
    Safety Authority; Norwegian Directorate of Health; Department of Nutrition;           Vollset SE: Folic acid supplementation and interpregnancy interval.
    2001.                                                                                 Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2014, 28(3):270–274.
33. Brantsaeter AL, Haugen M, Hagve TA, Aksnes L, Rasmussen SE, Julshamn K,         55.   Bergen NE, Jaddoe VW, Timmermans S, Hofman A, Lindemans J, Russcher H,
    Alexander J, Meltzer HM: Self-reported dietary supplement use is                      Raat H, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Steegers EA: Homocysteine and folate
    confirmed by biological markers in the Norwegian Mother and Child                     concentrations in early pregnancy and the risk of adverse pregnancy
    Cohort Study (MoBa). Ann Nutr Metab 2007, 51(2):146–154.                              outcomes: the Generation R Study. BJOG 2012, 119(6):739–751.
34. Haugen M, Brantsaeter AL, Alexander J, Meltzer HM: Dietary supplements          56.   Nilsen RM, Suren P, Gunnes N, Alsaker ER, Bresnahan M, Hirtz D, Hornig M,
    contribute substantially to the total nutrient intake in pregnant                     Lie KK, Lipkin WI, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Roth C, Schjolberg S, Smith GD,
    Norwegian women. Ann Nutr Metab 2008, 52(4):272–280.                                  Susser E, Vollset SE, Oyen AS, Magnus P, Stoltenberg C: Analysis of self-
35. FAO/WHO Expert Consultation: Requirements of Vitamin A, Iron, Folate and              selection bias in a population-based cohort study of autism spectrum
    Vitamin B12 Report of a Joint Fao/Who Expert Consultation (Fao Fisheries              disorders. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2013, 27(6):553–563.
Sengpiel et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14:375                                                                                 Page 12 of 12
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/375

57. Nilsen RM, Vollset SE, Gjessing HK, Skjaerven R, Melve KK, Schreuder P,
    Alsaker ER, Haug K, Daltveit AK, Magnus P: Self-selection and bias in a
    large prospective pregnancy cohort in Norway. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol
    2009, 23(6):597–608.
58. Brantsaeter AL, Haugen M, Alexander J, Meltzer HM: Validity of a new food
    frequency questionnaire for pregnant women in the Norwegian Mother
    and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Matern Child Nutr 2008, 4(1):28–43.

 doi:10.1186/s12884-014-0375-1
 Cite this article as: Sengpiel et al.: Folic acid supplementation, dietary
 folate intake during pregnancy and risk for spontaneous preterm
 delivery: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and
 Childbirth 2014 14:375.

                                                                                Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
                                                                                and take full advantage of:

                                                                                • Convenient online submission
                                                                                • Thorough peer review
                                                                                • No space constraints or color figure charges
                                                                                • Immediate publication on acceptance
                                                                                • Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
                                                                                • Research which is freely available for redistribution

                                                                                Submit your manuscript at
                                                                                www.biomedcentral.com/submit
You can also read