HM Treasury's consultation on a proposed UK regulatory framework for stable tokens
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
HM Treasury’s consultation on a
proposed UK regulatory framework
for stable tokens
January 2021
Introduction Proposed extension of regulation
On 7 January 2021, HM Treasury issued a consultation The FinProm Consultation and MiCA would extend
setting out its proposed approach to UK regulation of regulation to broad ranges of cryptoassets. By contrast,
cryptoassets, including a regulatory framework for this consultation proposes, at this stage, to create a single
"stable tokens”. The consultation sets out only high-level new category of regulated token, namely “stable tokens”,
proposals, without draft legislative text, on the basis that which are described as follows.1
detailed rules to implement the proposed regime will be
1. Function: stable tokens “stabilise their value by
consulted on by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and
referencing one or more assets, such as fiat currency or
Prudential Regulatory Authority in due course. The deadline
a commodity… and could for that reason more reliably be
for responding to the consultation is 21 March 2020.
used as a means of exchange or store of value."
We summarise various key aspects of the consultation in
2. Form: "whilst cryptoassets are typically underpinned by
this note, and compare HM Treasury’s proposed approach
[distributed ledger technology ie DLT], stable tokens could
to other recent initiatives in the UK and EU, including the
be designed using other types of technology.
following proposals referred to in the consultation:
This classification is therefore agnostic on the
– HM Treasury’s July 2020 consultation on extending the technology underpinning its use."
financial promotions (ie advertising) regime to cryptoassets
3. Subsets: a distinction is made between "asset-linked
(FinProm Consultation); and
tokens", whose value is associated with that of one or
– the European Commission's proposed regulation on more physical or financial assets or cryptoassets; and
markets in cryptoassets (MiCA) “single fiat-linked tokens”, whose value is pegged to a
single fiat currency.2 This is similar to the distinction made
between “asset-referenced tokens” and “electronic money
tokens” under MiCA.
1
Table 3.A of the consultation lists tokens within the initial proposed extension of regulation, and those that may become regulated at a later date.
2
“Algorithmic stablecoins” will not be classified as stable tokens, but may become regulated at a later date. They are described as maintaining a
stable value using protocols that change the supply of the token in response to changes in demand, without being backed by a reference asset.
HM Treasury’s consultation on a proposed UK regulatory framework for stable tokens – January 2021 allenovery.com
New proposals regarding stable tokens
The government proposes to regulate the following activities in relation to stable tokens.
Activity Comparison with other initiatives
i. Issuing, creating (ie minting) or destroying (ie burning) tokens MiCA: activities (i) to (iv) are similar to
proposed regulated activities under MiCA;
activities (v) to (vii) do not so obviously
ii. Providing token custody and administration services (such as providing
overlap with MiCA.
wallets with storage of private keys)
The FinProm Consultation proposes to
extend the financial promotions regime to
iii. Exchanging tokens for fiat money (such as fiat-crypto exchanges)
a range of activities in respect of qualifying
cryptoassets that do not directly correspond
iv. Executing transactions in tokens (conducting transactions on behalf to activities (i) to (vii). In some respects it
of another) appears broader, for example, capturing
financial promotions in respect of advising.
v. Value stabilisation and reserve management (such as custody or Some stable token activities listed, however,
management of reserve assets backing the value of tokens) may not be captured.
vi. Facilitating access to a network/infrastructure
vii. Validation of transactions and transmission of funds (such as by operating
a node on a blockchain)
Licensing regime for stable token activities
Depending on which activities are carried out, – Requirements to maintain and manage a reserve;
the government proposes that firms be subject to a range
– Insolvency obligations;
of requirements, including3:
– Token safeguarding obligations; and
– Authorisation/licensing;
– Financial crime, risk management, security
–P
rudential requirements, including capital and
and governance requirements.
liquidity requirements;
Notably, the government proposes that where a cryptoasset constitutes a security token it should be excluded from the
scope of the proposals for stable tokens, and similarly, utility tokens will likely also fall outside the scope of the stable tokens
proposals. The government recognises that certain stable tokens already fall within e-money regulation, and is therefore
considering whether to extend the e-money regime to all single fiat-linked tokens in order to avoid arbitrage and confusion.
Table 3.B of the consultation sets out further details of the applicability of these requirements to different types of activity.
3
HM Treasury’s consultation on a proposed UK regulatory framework for stable tokens – January 2021 allenovery.com
Regulation of stable token payment systems By comparison, MiCA also requires cryptoasset service
providers (for example, custody/brokerage service providers)
The government also proposes to bring stable token who provide services in the EU (which might be taken to
payment systems (and related service providers) within be the case if targeting EU customers) to establish an EU
scope of the existing UK payment systems regulation, registered office and be authorised in an EU member state.
namely within supervision by (i) the Bank of England under
the Banking Act if the stable token payment system is of This may therefore require providers to establish separate
systemic importance (ie when potential disruption could operating companies to serve different territories.
lead to financial stability risks), and (ii) the Payment Systems
Regulator under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Consultation questions
Act 2013 if disruption to its operation would have serious The consultation invites responses to questions covering
consequences for those who use its services. matters such as supervision of systemic stable token
systems and territorial scope, amongst other things.
Territorial scope It also includes a call for evidence on potential extension
The government is considering whether firms based offshore of regulation to a broader range of cryptocurrencies
but actively marketing to UK consumers should be required such as Bitcoin, the use of DLT-based financial markets
to have a UK establishment and be authorised in the UK, infrastructure, and decentralised finance.
consistent with the territoriality approach in the
FinProm Consultation.
Authors
Ben Regnard-Weinrabe Heenal Vasu Rory Copeland
Partner – London Senior Regulatory PSL – London Associate – London
Tel +44 20 3088 3207 Tel +44 20 3088 1447 Tel +44 20 3088 1573
ben.regnard-weinrabe@allenovery.com heenal.vasu@allenovery.com rory.copeland@allenovery.com
Allen & Overy means Allen & Overy LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. Allen & Overy LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC306763. Allen & Overy
(Holdings) Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales with registered number 07462870. Allen & Overy LLP and Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited are authorised and regulated by the
Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Allen & Overy LLP or a director of Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited or, in either case, an employee
or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications or an individual with equivalent status in one of Allen & Overy LLP’s affiliated undertakings. A list of the members of Allen & Overy LLP and of the
non-members who are designated as partners, and a list of the directors of Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited, is open to inspection at our registered office at One Bishops Square, London E1 6AD.
© Allen & Overy LLP 2021. This document is for general guidance only and does not constitute advice. UK
CS2101_CDD-62726_ADD-93880
allenovery.com
You can also read
