IMPACT BONDS: WHERE NEXT? - IRP-HSG

Page created by Yvonne Cannon
 
CONTINUE READING
IMPACT BONDS: WHERE NEXT? - IRP-HSG
IMPACT BONDS: WHERE NEXT?
      EVALUATING IMPACT FOR EFFECTIVE PHILANTHROPY –
     WORKSHOP SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & IMPACT INVESTING
HSG CENTER FOR EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT – 15 JANUARY 2020

        Dr Maximilian Martin, Global Head of Philanthropy, Lombard Odier Group
IMPACT BONDS: WHERE NEXT? - IRP-HSG
2017: The world’s first “Humanitarian Impact Bond” launched
to transform financing of aid in conflict-hit countries

Please see important information at the end of the document
2 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
                                                              For illustrative purposes only.
 Sources: ICRC
IMPACT BONDS: WHERE NEXT? - IRP-HSG
Context: Impact bonds – the first decade
State of the market: lots of innovation, limited scale

Please see important information at the end of the document
3 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
Addressing key impact bond challenges
Action items to move from pilots to a fully functioning market

   Social Impact Bonds vs Green Bonds                                                                                Key challenges of impact bond market
                                                                                                                     • Low volume – Small-scale projects face several obstacles when
                                   Impact bonds                      Green bonds                                       searching for financing. As this market is still in its infancy with a limited
                                                                                                                       proven track record, many governments are cautious about engaging in
                                                                                                                       the market. On a broader level, questions have been raised about the
                                    176 launched                  4,343 green bonds                                    availability of monetizable and easily measurable socially desirable
                                     since 2010                    in 2018 used for                                    outcomes that would be suitable for SIB projects.
                                                                  buildings, transport
                                                                                                                     • High transaction costs - Within the SIB market, transaction costs are
                                                                    & energy alone                                     dominated by the costs incurred for intermediary services and technical
                                                                                                                       assistance, evaluation, and legal fees. Further, deal development
                                      USD 418                           USD 168                                        ranged from six months to three years. Given the nascent and relatively
                                                                                                                       ad-hoc nature of the SIB market, these transaction costs are
                                     million raised                  billion in 2018                                   considered to be extremely high and prohibitive for further scaling.
                                                                     only (USD 521
                                                                     bn since 2007)                                  • Availability of capital - The availability of private entities willing to
                                                                                                                       invest capital in SIBs remains limited. The reasons include: 1) lack of
                                                                                                                       investment vehicles and credible financial intermediaries that can be
                                        738’671*                               na                                      trusted to direct capital flows, 2) minimizing the uncertainty of future
                                     lives touched                                                                     payments is difficult, 3) pay-outs can occur over extended time periods,
                                                                                                                       4) few entities are willing to play the role of market maker.

Sources: Climate Bond Initiative, “Green Bonds – the state of the market 2018”, https://www.climatebonds.net/files/reports/cbi_gbm_final_032019_web.pdf; Statista
;*: Estimate from Social Finance 2017
 Please see important information at the end of the document
4 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
The Program for Humanitarian Impact Investment
Mechanics & learnings

                                                                                                        • PHII Investment Agreement between the ICRC
                                                                                                          and the social investors
                                                                                                        • Payment by results agreements between
                                                                                                          outcome funders and the ICRC
                                                                                                        • Verification agreement between Philanthropy
                                                                                                          Advisors and the ICRC
                                                                                                        • Escrow agreement between UBS, the ICRC, and
                                                                                                          the social investors
                                                                                                        • ICRC will play the role of the social provider
                                                                                                          delivering the social intervention
                                                                                                        • Outcome metric: Staff Efficiency Ratios (SER) of
                                                                                                          PRP centres versus SER of baseline centres, in
                                                                                                          addition to number of beneficiaries reached

 1. Conflict-affected countries and other situations of violence.
 *Schematic representation based on publicly available information.
Please see important information at the end of the document
5 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
                                                                      For illustrative purposes only.
Key investment features
Creating a compelling proposition
       Programme outline                        CHF 18.6 million equivalent at the commencement date, supported by outcome funders’ pledges in 5 years,
                                                will be used to finance an increase in the capacity of (by construction) and the efficiency of (by process re-
                                                engineering) the delivery of prostheses, orthoses, and wheelchairs (mobility devices), and related
                                                physiotherapy, to improve the socio-economic circumstances of people with physical disabilities in:
                                                • Mali
                                                • Nigeria, and
                                                • the DRC
       Outcome funders                          Governments of Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, and the UK, as well as the “La Caixa” Banking Foundation
       Cornerstone investor                     An institutional investor from the insurance industry, New Reinsurance Company
       Operation duration                       The full 5 years from the commencement date
       Investor total return                    • 2% coupon for the first 4 years, in addition to
                                                • A return payment based on the success of the programme operations at the end of year 5, net of coupon
                                                  already paid
       Return payment                           The return payment is based on the impact the programme has had on the efficiency of delivery of mobility
                                                devices to beneficiaries. It is calculated and verified by a verification provider, and compared to an average
                                                historical SER of comparable ICRC centres. If the ICRC is more efficient, a return of up to 7% IRR is due on
                                                completion of programme operations at the end of 5 years. If the ICRC is less efficient, then investors could
                                                lose up to 40% of principal.
       Escrow bank                              UBS AG Zurich
       Verification provider                    Philanthropy Advisors

Please see important information at the end of the document
6 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
                                                                                 For illustrative purposes only.
Value proposition
A strategic approach to solving important bottlenecks

   •      It is the first time an established aid organisation in the humanitarian space
          with a large budget (>CHF 1.5 billion) has looked to impact investors to
          help fund its work on such a scale;

   •      Government funding often has a time horizon of 1-2 years. It rarely reaches                          • Channel additional resources – EUR 22m of five-
          beyond the electoral cycle. Providing financing certainty for a longer                                 year funding to provide much needed humanitarian
          period of time, in this case five years, not only allows the construction of                           services to people in conflict affected countries 
          new centres, but also permits actors to take a strategic perspective, aiming                           construction and operation of three centres in Africa;
          for much higher expectations of efficiency;
                                                                                                               • Test and implement new efficiency initiatives –
   •      The project funds three new centres. However, the ICRC has been                                        social impact expected to reach far beyond the three
          operating 139 rehabilitation projects in 34 countries since 1979, helping                              centres;
          almost 330,000 people. The ultimate impact therefore reaches much further.
                                                                                                               • Successful co-operation of different European
          The three centres will be piloting the next generation of physical
                                                                                                                 parties (governments, humanitarian actors and
          rehabilitation service delivery. Next to the immediate impact on the
                                                                                                                 private investors) to bring about potentially game-
          thousands of beneficiaries served, the PHII is financing the innovation of a
                                                                                                                 changing improvement of services and a new
          core programme, to take it to the next level;
                                                                                                                 financing model in the humanitarian space, inspired
                                                                                                                 by social impact bonds.
   •      While this private loan belongs to the family of social impact bonds because
          it links a social outcome (physical rehabilitation) to a financial return, it is the
          scale, effectiveness and potential impact of this project that makes it
          stand out, in addition to the different financial structure.

Please see important information at the end of the document
7 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
                                                                             For illustrative purposes only.
The Staff Efficiency Ratio (SER)
Measuring impact
                                                                Number of mobility devices delivered (adjusted)
                                     SER =
                                                         Number of staff involved in mobility device delivery (adjusted)

  SER calculation methodology
                                          (# of Prostheses x 1 ) + (# of Orthoses x 0.74 ) + (# of Wheelchairs x 0.90 )
 ((# of trained P&Os x 1 ) + (# of P&Os without training x 0.75 ) + (# of bench workers x 0.50 )) x working hours ratio

The formula is designed to make physical rehabilitation centres comparable to each other and to prevent
perverse incentives.
            Each type of mobility device is given a different weight to account for the different labour time requirements to
            manufacture them. As a result, there is no incentive to produce the least time-intensive device to improve the SER in a way
            detrimental to the beneficiaries’ best interest.

            Different categories of rehabilitation professionals are given different weights according to their level of education
            (assuming that better trained professionals work more efficiently). This avoids penalising centres that are staffed with less
            qualified supporting staff (i.e., bench workers), because of an exogenous lack of trained prosthetists and orthotists in the region
            where a centre operates.
            The working hours ratio adjusts for differences in centres’ working hours (as if they all worked a 40-hour week). This
            avoids creating distortions among centres which have quite different modus operandi depending on the country/region.
Please see important information at the end of the document
8 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
                                                                             For illustrative purposes only.
Feasibility and implementation
Key factors for consideration derived from other impact fund projects

                                 Focus - Identify a programme of strategic importance to your organisation that has the potential
                                  to be taken to the next level.

                                 Participation - Launch an ambitious internal brainstorming and readiness assessment effort to
                                  consider how alternative funding mechanisms could provide the capital needed for a future
                                  iteration of that core programme.

                                 Impact measurement - Develop a set of metrics that can track the programme’s results at a
                                  reasonable cost and establish a base of empirical evidence.

                                 Senior engagement - Make sure senior leaders are willing and able to devote the attention
                                  required for this effort to succeed.

                                 External support - Enlist funders close to the organisation and make them part of a joint
                                  “moonshot” innovation effort.

                                 Timeline - Recognise that innovative financing efforts may take time—and give yourself the time
                                  needed, and the budget.
Source: Martin (2017), “The Next Phase of Innovative Financing,” Stanford Social Innovation Review
Please see important information at the end of the document
9 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
                                                                                                     For illustrative purposes only.
Looking back to look ahead: A preliminary evaluation
Praise vs. criticism

Praise                                                              Criticism
 By making private investment available to social programmes, Х Too early to have definitive evidence SIBs are delivering on
    SIBs were expected to bring innovation, more money, and              their promise.2
    better outcomes for society’s most disadvantaged people.        Х Most SIBs are low risk and high return - instead of funding
 De-risking programs for governments should allow a bigger              innovative programmes, private capital is backing social
    variety of social programmes.                                        programmes with a proven track record.2
 Provides a way to generate more funding for social policy         Х SIBs require direct attribution of outcomes, their focus is
    while also proving attractive to investors. 1                        narrowed to a single programme when we should be thinking
 Relatively new financial solution, yet high level of interest and      more holistically about how to address complex social
    latent demand.                                                       problems. 2
 To evolve, improve reporting, outcome measurement and             Х The need to return profits in a timely fashion to investors can
    structuring in the years to come.                                    deter a comprehensive program evaluation that leads to
 At its core, pay for success includes a number of                      possible program improvement. 2
    fundamentally value creating elements, including data-          Х Privately negotiated, customised arrangements are not easily
    informed decision-making, adaptive governance structures,            amenable to standardisation, transparency, or liquidity, which
    and active performance management.                                   curbs their potential to scale. 3

Sources: 1: Financial Times, “Table: the top global social impact bonds”, 4 Dec. 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/99b49376-eea6-11e8-89c8-d36339d835c0
         2:Stanford Social Innovation Review, “The Downside of Social Impact Bonds”, 31 May 2019. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_downside_of_social_impact_bonds
         3:Stanford Social Innovation Review, “Social Impact Bonds: What’s in a Name?”, 12 Oct. 2016. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/social_impact_bonds_whats_in_a_name
Please see important information at the end of the document
10 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
Backup impact bonds risk distribution
Table summarising SIB stakeholder risks

Sources: OECD, Social Impact Bonds: State of Play and Lessons Learnt, 2016. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/SIBs-State-Play-Lessons-Final.pdf
Please see important information at the end of the document
11 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
Information importante

Le présent document de marketing a été préparé par Lombard Odier (Europe) S.A., un établissement de crédit                 Odier (Europe) S.A. au Luxembourg et de chacune de ses succursales opérant dans les territoires suivants :
agréé et réglementé par la Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) au Luxembourg. La                        Belgique : Lombard Odier (Europe) S.A. Luxembourg · Succursale de Belgique ; France: Lombard Odier (Europe)
publication de document de marketing a été approuvée par chacune de ses succursales opérant dans les territoires           S.A. · Succursale en France ; Italie : Lombard Odier (Europe) S.A. · Succursale in Italia ; Espagne : Lombard Odier
mentionnés au bas de cette page (ci-après « Lombard Odier »). Il n’est pas destiné à être distribué, publié ou utilisé     (Europe) S.A. · Sucursal en España ; et Royaume-Uni : Lombard Odier (Europe) S.A. • UK Branch. Avis aux
dans une juridiction où une telle distribution, publication ou utilisation serait interdite, et ne s’adresse pas aux       investisseurs au Royaume-Uni : Lombard Odier (Europe) S.A. • UK Branch est autorisée au Royaume-Unit par la
personnes ou entités auxquelles il serait illégal d’adresser un tel document de marketing. Le présent document de          Prudential Regulatrions Authority (PRA) et soumise à une réglementation limitée par la Financial Conduct Authority
marketing est fourni à titre d’information uniquement et ne saurait constituer une offre ou une recommandation de          (FCA) et la Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). Vous pouvez obtenir, sur demande, auprès de notre banque
souscrire, d’acheter, de vendre ou de conserver un quelconque titre ou instrument financier. Il reflète les opinions       plus de détails sur la portée de notre agrément et de notre réglementation par la PRA ainsi que sur la
de Lombard Odier à la date de sa publication. Ces opinions et les informations exprimées dans le présent                   réglementation par la FCA. La réglementation britannique sur la protection des clients privés au Royaume-
document ne prennent pas en compte la situation, les objectifs ou les besoins spécifiques de chaque personne.              Uni et les indemnisations définies dans le cadre du Financial Services Compensation Scheme ne
Aucune garantie n’est donnée qu’un investissement soit approprié ou convienne aux circonstances individuelles, ni          s’appliquent pas aux investissements ou aux services fournis par une personne à l’étranger (« overseas
qu’un investissement ou une stratégie constituent un conseil en investissement personnalisé pour un investisseur.          person »). Par ailleurs, la publication du présent document de marketing a également été approuvé pour utilisation
Le traitement fiscal dépend de la situation individuelle de chaque client et est susceptible d’évoluer avec le temps.      par les entités suivantes domiciliées au sein de l’Union européenne : Gibraltar : Lombard Odier & Cie (Gibraltar)
Lombard Odier ne fournit pas de conseils fiscaux. Il vous incombe par conséquent de vérifier les informations              Limited, une société agréée et réglementée par la Commission des services financiers de Gibraltar (FSC) pour
susmentionnées et toutes les autres informations fournies dans les documents de marketing ou de consulter vos              exercer des activités de services bancaires et de services d’investissement ; Espagne : Lombard Odier Gestión
conseillers fiscaux externes à cet égard. Certains produits et services de placement, y compris le dépôt, peuvent          (España) SGIIC., S.A., une société de gestion d’investissements agréée et réglementée par la Comisión Nacional
être soumis à des restrictions juridiques ou peuvent ne pas être disponibles dans le monde entier sans restrictions.       del Mercado de Valores (CNMV), Espagne.
Les informations et les analyses contenues dans le présent document sont basées sur des sources considérées                Etats-Unis : Ni ce document ni aucune copie de ce dernier ne peuvent être envoyés, emmenés ou distribués aux
comme fiables. Lombard Odier fait tout son possible pour garantir l’actualité, l’exactitude, l’exhaustivité desdites       Etats-Unis ou remis à une US-Person.
informations. Néanmoins, toutes les informations, opinions et indications de prix peuvent être modifiées sans              Le présent document de marketing ne peut être reproduit (en totalité ou en partie), transmis, modifié ou utilisé à des
préavis.                                                                                                                   fins publiques ou commerciales sans l’autorisation écrite et préalable de Lombard Odier.
Tout investissement est exposé à une diversité de risques. Avant d’effectuer une quelconque transaction, il est            Information importante sur la protection des données: Lorsque vous recevez cette communication marketing,
conseillé à l’investisseur de vérifier minutieusement si elle est adaptée à sa situation personnelle et, si nécessaire,    nous pouvons traiter vos données personnelles à des fins de marketing direct. Nous vous informons par la présente
d’obtenir un avis professionnel indépendant quant aux risques et aux conséquences juridiques, réglementaires,              que vous avez le droit de vous opposer à tout moment au traitement de vos données personnelles à des fins de
fiscales, comptables ainsi qu’en matière de crédit.                                                                        marketing, ce qui inclut le profilage dans la mesure où il est lié à un tel marketing direct. Si vous souhaitez vous
Les performances passées n’offrent aucune garantie quant aux résultats courants ou futurs et il se peut que                opposer au traitement de vos données personnelles à cet égard, veuillez vous adresser au responsable de la
l’investisseur récupère un montant inférieur à celui initialement investi. La valeur de tout investissement dans une       protection des données du Groupe : Banque Lombard Odier & Cie S.A., Group Data Protection Officer, 11, Rue de
monnaie autre que la monnaie de base d’un portefeuille est exposée au risque de change. Les taux peuvent varier            la Corraterie, 1204 Genève, Suisse. Courriel : group-dataprotection@lombardodier.com. Membres de l'UE : Pour
et affecter défavorablement la valeur de l’investissement quand ce dernier est réalisé et converti dans la monnaie         de plus amples informations sur la politique de protection des données en ce qui concerne le règlement général de
de base de l’investisseur. La liquidité d’un investissement dépend de l’offre et de la demande. Certains produits          l'UE sur la protection des données (GDPR), qui s'applique à Lombard Odier (Europe) S.A. et à ses succursales,
peuvent ne pas disposer d’un marché secondaire bien établi où s’avérer difficiles à valoriser dans des conditions de       Lombard Odier & Cie (Gibraltar) Limited et Lombard Odier Gestión (España) S.G.I.I.C., S.A.U., veuillez consulter le
marché extrêmes, ce qui peut se traduire par une volatilité de leur cours et rendre difficile la détermination d’un prix   site www.lombardodier.com/privacy-policy.
pour la vente de l’actif.                                                                                                  © 2019 Lombard Odier (Europe) S.A. – Tous droits réservés. Ref. LOESA-GM-fr-052018.
Membres de l’UE : La publication du présent document de marketing a été approuvé pour utilisation par Lombard

 Please see important information at the end of the document
 12 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
Please see important information at the end of the document
13 · Philanthropy Services· January 2020
You can also read