Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII

Page created by Raul Warner
 
CONTINUE READING
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021
MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH PROJECTS ON PERSONALISED MEDICINE
DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL SUPPORT TOOLS FOR PM IMPLEMENTATION

       Dr Maria Jose Ruiz Alvarez, Joint Call Secretariat 2021
       Italian Ministry of Health

                                         Virtual conference, 25 January 2021
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
Personalised medicine definition
• “Personalised Medicine refers to a medical model
 using characterisation of individuals’ phenotypes
 and genotypes (e.g. molecular profiling, medical
 imaging, lifestyle data) for tailoring the right
 therapeutic strategy for the right person at the right
 time, and/or to determine the predisposition to
 disease and/or to deliver timely and targeted
 prevention”
 “..as stated in the Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA) of PerMed, adopted
                              from the H2020 advisory group!

Mentimeter code 72 00 426
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
Personalised Medicine is non-disease-specific
         Proposals from any medical research area are encouraged in
                             ERA PerMed calls

Mentimeter code : 72 00 426
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
JTC 2018- 2019- 2020

ERA PerMed newsletter- information about all
funded projects

http://www.erapermed.eu/category/newsletter/

If you’d like to receive our Newsletter,

please fill in the form

http://www.erapermed.eu/newsletter/follow-us/
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
ERA PerMed – non EU co-funded JTC 2021

                                         16 EU countries ( AU, BE, CR, DE, EST, FI
                                         FR, GE, HU, IT, LAT, LU, PO, RO, SP, SW)
 CSC*
                          23 Countries   3 H2020 associated countries: Turkey, Norway, Israel
30 Partners
                                         4 third countries: Brazil, Chile, Egypt & Panama
                                                  5 regions (Saxony, Lombardy, Catalonia,
                                                             Navarra and Tuscany)
                                                  1 charity: AECC
             Call Secretariat (JCS)
             Italian Ministry of Health (IT-MoH)
             ITALY with the support of FRRB
                                                           Countries´ ex ante Budget
                       healthresearch@sanita.it                 24M € approx.

CSC*: Call Steering Commitee

Mentimeter code : 72 00 426
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
Finding suitable partners for your research Consortia while
             participating in ERA PerMed calls

 https://partnering.pt-dlr.de/ICPerMed

 Mentimeter code : 72 00 426
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
Eligible       Academia (research teams working in universities,
partners:      other higher education institutions) or research
               institutes

               Clinical/public health sector (research teams working
               in hospitals/public health and/or other healthcare
               settings and health organisations)
               Participation of clinicians (e.g. medical doctors,
               nurses) in the research teams is encouraged
               Private partners

 For a definition of eligible partners, see “Guidelines for Applicants”, the
 regional/national regulations, and contact your regional/national
 funding organisation (see also Annex I)
Informative Day ERA PerMed JTC 2021 - ISCIII
Aim of the call
• What? …..fosters research and innovation building linkage
  between clinical research, computer science /medical
  informatics and research on ELSA in PM.

• How?     …multidisciplinary    activities   brought     together
  stakeholders from academia, clinical/public health research and
  private partners, policy makers, regulatory / health technology
  assessment (HTA) agencies and patients / patient organisations

• Why? …to improve disease prevention and disease
  management (patient stratification, diagnostics and tailored
  treatment / prevention protocols for both patients and
  individuals at risk of disease)
Objectives
• Support translational and transnational research projects

• Encourage and enable interdisciplinary collaboration
  towards the implementation of PM, combining clinical
  research, bio-informatics components and ethical, legal and
  social aspects. Additionally, pre-clinical and health economic
  research

• Encourage collaboration between academia, clinical/public
  health research , private partners as well as policy makers,
  regulatory/HTA agencies and patient representative
  organisations.
ERA PerMed Co-funded JTC 2018
    “Research projects on personalised medicine – smart combination
    of pre-clinical and clinical research with data and ICT solutions”

                                                                 Joint Call
                                                                 Secretariat (JCS)
                                                                 National
                                                                 Institute of
          22 funded projects                                     Health Carlos III
      24.6M € requested funding                                  (ISCIII) SPAIN.
                                                                 31 Partners
                                                                 from 23
                                                                 Countries
ERA PerMed JTC 2019
              30 Partners
                                  … MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH TOWARDS
                                  IMPLEMENTATION
              22 Countries

Call Secretariat (JCS)
French National Research Agency (ANR)
FRANCE

Each project proposal MUST address at least one module
of Research Area 3 and at least one module of Research
Area 1 or 2.

                                     22 funded projects
                                 24.6M € requested funding
ERA PerMed JTC 2020
      31 Partners
                                  ….PRE-/CLINICAL RESEARCH, BIG DATA AND ICT,
      23 Countries                IMPLEMENTATION AND USER’S PERSPECTIVE”

Call Secretariat (JCS)
German Aerospace Centre (DLR)
GERMANY

            Each project proposal MUST address at least one module of Research Area 3
            and at least one module of Research Area 1 or 2.

                             18 funded projects
                         23.3M € requested funding
ERAPerMed –JTC 2021
“MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH PROJECTS ON PERSONALISED
MEDICINE – DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL SUPPORT TOOLS FOR
PERSONALISED MEDICINE IMPLEMENTATION”
✓ application and validation of known biomarkers

✓ On therapeutic targets

✓ How implementation of technology and research findings will
  be transformed into clinical practice and address regulatory
  questions-

     Pre-clinical                    Clinical Research

 ---------ensure the robustness and reproducibility of results is
strongly encouraged
✓ pre-clinical predictive models for (A) validation of data and
  hypotheses from human population, clinical, molecular and
  genomics studies and/or (B) prediction of clinical outcomes

✓ Classification of diseases at the molecular level

✓ Validation and characterisation of the role of biomarkers in
  predictive medicine
Mandatory Research module

✓ Improvement, validation and combination of analytical tools and methods
  for diagnostics and treatment, allowing the discovery and validation of
  molecular and environmental factors that can be used for patient stratification
  and treatment decisions.

✓ Pharmacokinetics & pharmacodynamics on preparation of clinical trials.

✓ Innovative clinical trial methodologies; novel strategies to accelerate the
  transition from clinical observation to diagnostic development.
Mandatory Research module

✓ New concepts and stratification strategies in exploratory clinical studies (pilot
  studies and Feasibility studies)

✓ Clinical, omics and environmental data integration, use of machine learning
  to provide the basis for more personalised treatment for patients.

✓ Implementation in the treatment of patients with comorbidities.

✓ Clinical support tools testing and validation in clinical practice.

✓ Innovative m/e-health or telemedicine applications testing and validation in a
  clinical setting.
✓ Re-use and sharing of data through public databases are encouraged and the
  re-use or combination of existing tools

✓ Data from experimental evidence (also present), various types of data
  generated in silico or directly by patients and Clinical data

✓ Robust analysis and interpretation of results with data security / protection.

✓ Development of common standards and working practices for storage,
  accessibility, interoperability and re-use of samples and data generated
Mandatory Research module

✓ Artificial intelligence approaches to Big data to find new subgroups of
  patients, to predict patient outcome to treatment and for biomarker
  validation.

✓ Development of good practices for the management of samples and data
  (FAIR and GDPR ).

✓ Development of approaches for the innovative and combined use of already
  validated and / or new eHealth and mHealth

✓ Development of innovative telemedicine applications for direct contact
  between healthcare personnel and patients.
✓ The studies conducted in 3A and 3B and the corresponding work package
  should relate directly to the research question(s) addressed in A 1 and 2.

  ✓ Research on health economic aspects of newly innovative PM approaches

  ✓ Research investigating whether a patient-centred, new PM approach
    requires refinement of – or even new – health economic and pharma-
    economic models, for the treatment of diseases or for their prevention.
Mandatory Research module

  ✓ Research on ethical, legal and social aspects, when using artificial intelligence
    techniques & genetic engineering.

  ✓ Genetic testing in clinical practice, the clinical interpretation of test results
    and the potential clinical, ethical and legal consequences

  ✓ potentially biased datasets lacking (sample) heterogeneity of information

  ✓ personal/individual component during the creation of decision support tools
Mandatory Research module

✓ regulatory approval of clinical decision systems based on statistical learning,
  machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies

✓ decision support tools in the prevention and stratification of the healthy
  society/population and fair access

✓ equal access to PM approaches for all patients

✓ Right to know/not to know and sharing of research findings

✓ How to enable stakeholder exchange and collaboration from the beginning of
  a study
Evaluation:                              Pre-proposal phase
                                                                        Changes from the
  2-Steps procedure                                                     pre-proposal to the
                                                                        full-proposal phase
                                              Full–proposal phase
                                                                        are limited

                                               Peer Review Panel

                                    Rules         Ranking list            Available funds

Take note ! All documents are available
             on the website:                Selection of Projects to be funded
                     …
  Pre-eligibility document if required
                 Call text
                Guidelines                   National/ Regional Funding process
Annex with national/ regional budget &
               specific rules
    Eligible annexes in the pre- and
           full-proposal stage                 Follow up National/Regional &
                    ……                                  International
Pre-proposal
 template

           CALIBRI FONT SIZE 11……

In order to confirm your eligibility,
please contact your state/national
representatives of the participating
funding organisation prior to
submission.
Timeline JTC2021

                                                                                                                    Final funding decision
                                   Beginning of April:                                                      End September/ Beginning October 2021
                                    Pre-proposals
                                   sent to reviewers

                         Submission                                                  Submission                     Rebuttal
Pre-announcement
                          deadline                                           CSC       deadline                    Phase and         PRP and CSC
           Launch       pre-proposals                                       meeting full-proposals              Quality evaluation    meeting

October
          14 December    4 March        March                                 May            June                      August        September

                                                     Evaluation 1st stage                           Evaluation 2nd stage
                          Formal and national/regional eligibility check

                     Central eligibility check: Joint Call Secretariat
                     Regional/national eligibility check by the respective funding
                     organisations
   Take note!
   Pre-eligibility
   check form
                                                                            Underrepresented countries can
                                                                            join the proposals at this stage!
Notes about evaluation process:
  Coherent integration and combination of the different research areas and
  modules in the proposals is part of the evaluation process
  Remote evaluation (pre-proposal & full-proposal)

    • Allocation of 3 Reviewers /Proposal

    • 3 Evaluation criteria: Excellence, Impact and Implementation
                               Scoring system from 0 to 5 : maximum 15
                               Threshold 3 for each criterion (mean of 3 experts)

    • Ranking list: The PRP establishes a list of proposals recommended for funding and
       NOT recommended for funding

    • 1st step evaluation (pre-proposal) General budget rules and rank list influence the
       decision on the number of proposals invited to the second phase (of 150      50 )
       2nd step evaluation (full-proposal) Negotiations following rank list to allow the
  funding of as many projects as possible by optimizing the regional/national budget
  (of 50    20 )
Evaluation Criteria
              1.- Excellence of the proposal:
a.   Clarity and relevance
b.   Scientific quality of approach and methodology
c.   Soundness
d.   Novelty
e.   Feasibility of the project
f.   Relevance for the advancement of PM
g.   Quality of the consortium: international competitiveness,
     previous work and expertise, added value of the transnational
     collaboration.
2.- Impact of the proposal:

a. Added value of the transnational collaboration; sharing of
   resources, platforms/infrastructures, harmonisation of data
   and sharing of specific know-how
b. Potential impact of the expected results
c. Involvement of pertinent patient organisations/representatives
   (if available/applicable)
d. Involvement of private partners if available/applicable
e. Innovative potential
f. Consideration of sex aspects and underrepresented
   populations in research teams. Inclusion of sex and/or gender
   analysis and underrepresented populations in the research, if
   applicable
3.- Quality and efficiency of the implementation
a.   Quality of the project plan;
b.   Adequateness of the work package structure and work plan;
c.   Balanced participation of project partners and integration of workload in
     the different work packages, quality and efficiency of the coordination and
     scientific management;
d.   Scientific justification and adequateness of the requested budget
e.   Risk assessment, regulatory and ethics issues properly addressed (when
     necessary);
f.   Coherent integration and combination of Research Areas and Modules in
     the proposal.
ERA PerMed Experts Peer Review Panel (PRP)

• The selection is based on their experience on the different research
  areas and in this very broad medical field , taking into account the
  right Geographical and Gender Balance (also experts from outside
  the consortium)

• Good skills in the evaluation process.

• Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Declaration has to be signed

   Are you interested in increasing your knowledge of the evaluation process
   and strengthening your network and position internationally ?
                                                 Check your CI and contact us
Research consortium:
• Each consortium must involve at least 3 partners eligible for funding from 3 different
  countries whose funders participate in the call. All 3 legal entities must be
  independent
• Maximum number of partners /pre-proposal is 6 (no more than 2 partners from the
  same country)

• At least 2 partners out of the minimum 3 eligible project partners of the consortium
  must be from two different EU Member States or Associated Countries.
Each project partner (research group) has to be represented by one principal
investigator .

The coordinator represent a research group/partner and must be eligible for funding
being responsible for the internal scientific management of project

For regional/national eligibility reasons, applicants shall avoid applying to different
calls for same research activities.
Double funding is not permitted

         Strongly encouraged:
         - the active involvement of members of the public in the proposed research
         projects.
         - Inclusion of sex, gender analysis and/or underrepresented populations
         - Scientific Data Open Access Policy- DMP
Patient involvement

ERA PerMed strongly encourages the active involvement of members of the
public in the proposed research projects.

This includes patients, citizens/potential patients, healthcare providers, people
who use health and social care services, as well as patient organisations.

Goal: to raise awareness, share knowledge and improve dialogue between
researchers, healthcare providers, policy-makers, industry and citizens.

The involvement of patient representatives/organisations in research proposals
submitted to this call is part of the evaluation:
“2. Impact: c.
“3. Quality and efficiency of the implementation: e.
JTC 2021- Take note

             • Interdisciplinary (academia, clinical/public health sector and
               private partners)
             • Clear impact on PM and benefit for patient/public
        1    • Discus your project with all stakeholder involved

             • Areas & modules: Coherent integration and combination in the
               WP. Module/WP/Partner
             • Partners: Coherent integration /WP and complementarity
        2    • Active participation of early-career researchers/scientists

             • Active involvement of public
             • Inclusion of sex, gender analysis and/or underrepresented
               population
        3    • Data : FAIR & DMP

   PLEASE, READ CALL TEXT , ANNEX AND GUIDELINES CAREFULLY
After the selection for funding:
• Consortium
  members of projects
  must establish the    • No later than three
                          months after the      • No later than six
  start data of                                   months after the
  scientific project      scientific project
                          start date              scientific project
  which will be the                               start date.
  reference date for
  the annual progress       Data
  reports and final      management               Consortium
  reporting.                Plan                Agreement (CA)

  Start data
Why you should join this call

               Enhance the networking : quality of their research teams,
               international position, reduce health R&D cost by aligning
  Funding      expenses with other countries/regions
Organisation   Socio-economic positive impacts: health service improvement, new
               employment lines

                  Strengthening the network
                  Receiving funding and international position
 Researcher       Knowledge/technology transfer
                  Helping/ Encouraging researchers to become
                  entrepreneurs

                            Increasing Knowledge process of evaluation
 Expert on Panel            and Strengthening the network and improve
   Evaluation               your international position
Thanks on behalf of Joint Call Secretariat
  Italian Ministry of Health
      Dr. G. Guglielmi, Dr. M. Paganelli, Dr. M. Jose Ruiz

  & the support of Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca
  Biomedica (FRRB): P Bello, G. Caldieri & C. De Francesco.

                                  healthresearch@sanita.it

                 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
                 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 779282”.
Questions ?

Mentimeter code :
72 00 42 6
You can also read