Intraforaminal O2-O3 versus Periradicular Steroidal Infiltrations in Lower Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Study

Page created by Glenn Francis
 
CONTINUE READING
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:996–1000, May 2005

                  Intraforaminal O2-O3 versus Periradicular
                  Steroidal Infiltrations in Lower Back Pain:
                        Randomized Controlled Study
                        Matteo Bonetti, Alessandro Fontana, Biagio Cotticelli, Giorgio Dalla Volta,
                                      Massimiliano Guindani, and Marco Leonardi

             BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reports about steroids and oxygen-ozone therapy to treat
          lower back pain have been increasing. The purpose of our study was to compare the clinical
          outcomes in patients treated with infiltrations of O2-O3 gas or steroids at short-, medium-, and
          long-term follow-up.
             METHODS: A total of 306 patients (166 with primarily disk disease, 140 with nondisk
          vertebral disease) with acute or chronic low back and sciatic nerve pain received a CT-guided
          intraforaminal infiltration of an O2-O3 gas mixture or an periradicular infiltration of steroids.
          Neurologists unaware of the type of treatment assessed the patients.
             RESULTS: At 1-week follow-up, most patients had a complete remission of pain, regardless
          of the treatment. At 6-month follow-up, differences in favor of O2-O3 treatment were significant
          in patients with disk disease (P ⴝ .0021) but not in those without disk disease (P ⴝ .0992).
          Clinical outcomes were poor in 13 (15.1%) of 86 patients receiving O2-O3 infiltration and in 18
          (22.5%) of 80 patients receiving steroid injection (P ⴝ .2226). Among patients without disk
          disease, six (8.6%) of 70 patients receiving O2-O3 infiltration but 21.4% of the patients receiving
          steroid injections had poor outcomes (P ⴝ .0332).
             CONCLUSION: Oxygen-ozone treatment was highly effective in relieving acute and chronic
          lower back pain and sciatica. The gas mixture can be administered as a first treatment to
          replace epidural steroids.

Lower back pain with or without sciatic nerve involve-                       an O2-O3 gas mixture. Both methods have yielded
ment affects roughly 80% of the population at least                          encouraging results (3–7).
once in their lifetime. In addition, lower back pain is                         We compared the therapeutic effectiveness of
the leading cause of lost working days, which has a                          these methods, undertaking a randomized controlled
major effect on national healthcare spending (1). Un-                        study in 306 patients with acute or chronic low back
til 15 years ago, surgery was the treatment of choice,                       pain and sciatica. Patients were treated with either an
but conservative measures are now preferred in the                           intraforaminal infiltration of an O2-O3 gas mixture or
wake of unsatisfactory surgical outcomes (2). Among                          the periradicular infiltration of steroid.
the techniques adopted in the past decade to treat
sciatic nerve pain caused by a herniated disk or non-                                                  Methods
diskal spinal disease (osteophytosis, spondylolysis,
                                                                                Between March 2001 and December 2003, 306 patients (178
facet joint syndrome, etc.) are the periradicular infil-                     men, 128 women; age range, 26 –72 years; mean age, 48 years)
tration of a steroid and the intraforaminal injection of                     with acute or chronic low back and sciatic nerve pain were
                                                                             treated. All patients provided informed consent. Patients re-
                                                                             ceived CT-guided infiltration of an O2-O3 gas mixture or a
                                                                             steroid, and they were told that both were effective treatments
   Received June 28, 2004; accepted after revision August 19.
                                                                             according to recent findings reported in medical literature.
   From the Department of Neuroradiology and Division of Neu-
rology, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia (M.B., A.F., G.D.V.), the            On their enrollment, the name, date of birth, date of enroll-
Division of Neurology, Casa di Cura S. Anna (B.C., M.G.), and the            ment, date of treatment and clinical details were recorded for
Department of Neuroradiology Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna (M.L.),              each patient. We recorded the type of pain, irradiation, pares-
Italy.                                                                       thesias, presence of the Lasègue sign, degree of sensitivity,
   Address reprint requests to Dr Matteo Bonetti, Servizio di Neu-           lower limb reflexes, plantar extension of the foot, and dorsal
roradiologia, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Via Gualla 15,             extension of the big toe. Their records also included details
I–25123 Brescia, Italy.                                                      about the type of treatment given (steroid or O2-O3 mixture),
                                                                             but this information was withheld from the neurologists per-
© American Society of Neuroradiology                                         forming the follow-up assessment. Patients had acute or

                                                                       996
AJNR: 26, May 2005                                                               INFILTRATIONS FOR BACK PAIN                      997

                                                                     concentration of O3 in the gas mixture (i.e., the device auto-
                                                                     matically corrected the change in concentration that occurred
                                                                     when the syringe was withdrawn), with constant pressure dur-
                                                                     ing the O3-intake operation. We observed no toxicity effects as
                                                                     the titanium, Teflon, glass, and silicon, which are inert to the
                                                                     O3, were in contact with the gas (CE mark class 1B Alnitec
                                                                     device [Alnitec Cremosano, Italy]).
                                                                        Teams of neuroradiologists (M.B., A.F., B.C.) from two
                                                                     hospitals performed the infiltrations in both groups of patients,
                                                                     and two neurologists (G.D.V., M.G.) blinded to the type of
                                                                     treatment performed the clinical follow-up. The neurologists
                                                                     assessed the short (1-week), medium (3-month) and long-term
                                                                     (6-month) outcomes of treatment by using a modified version
                                                                     of the McNab method. Outcomes were classified as excellent,
                                                                     which was the resolution of pain and return to activity before
                                                                     the onset of pain; good or satisfactory, which was a reduction of
                                                                     pain by 50% or more; or mediocre or poor, which was partial
                                                                     reduction of pain by 30% or less.
                                                                        For statistical analysis, the ␹2 test was used.
FIG 1.    Preliminary CT measurements, periganglionic ap-
proach.
                                                                                                Results
chronic low back pain and sciatica, which was unilateral or             The Table summarizes the patients’ outcomes. At
which radiated along the innervation territories of L3 (18 pa-       short-term follow-up after treatment with steroid or
tients), L4 (89 patients), L5 (135 patients), or S1 (64 patients).
The duration of their symptoms was 1–20 months. Six patients
                                                                     O2-O3, patients with disk disease (80% or 84.8%,
had previously received an epidural infiltration of steroids         respectively) and those without disk disease (78.5%
without a notable improvement in symptoms.                           or 80%, respectively) had a complete remission of
   Patients with bilateral lower back and sciatic nerve pain and     pain. Therefore, good outcome were observed re-
those with electromyographic features of neurogenic injury           gardless of the treatment, although the difference was
and/or denervation were excluded and advised to seek neuro-          not statistically significant (P ⫽ .4077). At medium-
surgical treatment.
                                                                     term follow-up, 77.9% of the patients with disk dis-
   Before their enrollment, all patients had undergone CT or
MR imaging. On the basis of depicted neuroradiologic                 ease and 78.5% of those without disk disease were
changes, patients were divided into two groups: the disk-dis-        pain free after O2-O3 infiltration, compared with
ease group, or those with mainly disk disease (e.g., bulging disk,   67.5% and 70%, respectively, of those treated with
protrusion or extrusion; n ⫽ 166), and the non– disk-disease         steroid (P ⫽ .1318 and .2460, respectively).
group, or those with nondisk vertebral disease (e.g., osteo-            At long-term follow-up, 46 (57.5%) of 80 patients
phytosis, spondylolysis, facet joints syndromes; n ⫽ 140). Of the    in the disk-disease group who were treated with De-
166 patients with disk disease, 80 were treated by means of
steroid injection, whereas the remaining 86 received an infil-       pomedrol deemed the clinical outcome to be excel-
tration of an O2-O3 gas mixture. Of the140 patients without          lent, as did 44 (62.8%) of 70 patients in the non– disk-
disk disease, 70 received steroid injections, and 70 were re-        disease group after steroid infiltration. After O2-O3
ceived infiltrations of the O2-O3 gas mixture.                       infiltration, 64 (74.4%) of 86 patients with disk dis-
   In all patients, the injection site was disinfected, and local    ease reported complete remission of pain, as did 53
anesthesia applied by using an ethyl chloride spray. Infiltrations   (75.8%) of 70 patients without disk disease. Differ-
were done by specialist neuroradiologists at our institutions.
The puncture site was identified on CT scans and marked on
                                                                     ences in favor of O2-O3 treatment were significant in
the patient’s skin. The distance from this point to the foramen      patients with disk disease (P ⫽ .0021) but not in those
was subsequently measured (Fig 1).                                   without disk disease (P ⫽ .0992).
   A 22-gauge needle (Terumo, Leuven-Belgium) was posi-                 In the disk-disease group, 13 (15.1%) of 86 patients
tioned 2–3 mm from the foraminal region, close to the ganglion       treated with O2-O3 infiltration, and 18 (22.5%) of 80
of the affected nerve root. A 9-cm needle was typically used,        patients treated with steroid injection deemed their clin-
but longer needles were occasionally needed depending on the
                                                                     ical outcome poor (P ⫽ .2226). Among patients without
size of the patient. CT scanning was performed to check correct
needle placement. This procedure was used for infiltrations of       disk disease, six (8.6%) of 70 patients receiving O2-O3
both the O2-O3 mixture and the steroid (Figs 2– 4).                  infiltration but 21.4% of the patients receiving steroid
   Infiltrations of steroid 2 mL (80 mg, Methylprednisolone          injections had poor outcomes (P ⫽ .0332).
acetate; Depomedrol, Pfizer, Italy) was completed without con-
trast medium, by paying special attention to the speed of
infiltration. The procedure was completed slowly (over 1–2                                    Discussion
minutes) to avoid the reflux of steroid along the needle trajec-
tory. Patients with facet joint syndrome received injections into       Our short-term outcomes were similar in both
the surrounding joint capsule.                                       groups of patients, irrespective of the type of infiltra-
   O2-O3 was infiltrated by injecting 3 mL of the gas mixture at     tion administered. The basis of this pain relief with
a rate of 25 ␮g/mL close to the neural foramen. The needle was       steroid or O2-O3 infiltration appears to reflect be the
then retracted a few millimeters and another 5 mL of the
mixture was injected to involve the facet joint region. CT scans
                                                                     origin of nerve root pain. Zennaro et al (8) reported
were used to check the correct distribution of the gas mixture       that low back pain and sciatica have a neuritic origin,
in the foramen and facet joint. All treatments were performed        which reduces the role of disk herniation as the sole
by using equipment allowing the photometric detection of the         factor responsible for pain. In fact, episodes of back
998     BONETTI                                                                                        AJNR: 26, May 2005

                                                           FIG 2. Infiltration of the gas mixture.
                                                             A, L4-L5 right intraextraforaminal disk herniation (arrows).
                                                             B, Correct positioning of the needle.
                                                             C, Distribution of the gas mixture in the herniation (arrowheads)
                                                           and in the facet joint (arrows).

pain and sciatica are linked to factors not strictly
connected to the mechanical compression of the
nerve root, but rather, they caused by an nonspecific
inflammatory reaction to the autoantigens of the mu-
copolysaccharide matrix located on the disk surface
and exposed to the immune system by migration of
the disk nucleus beyond the natural barrier of the
annulus fibrosus (2, 9). The inflammatory reaction is
linked to release of lytic enzymes, such as E2 prosta-
glandins and A2 phospholipase. These enzymes are
present in the peridiskal epidural adipose environ-
ment in quantities a hundred-fold higher in patients
with disk herniation than in those with a bulging disk
alone, confirming the postulated inflammatory origin
of their pain (10 –13).
   In addition, larger amounts of herniated disk ma-
terial is known to be linked to faster degeneration of
the disk fragment, probably resulting from enhanced
macrophage activity triggered by the strong inflam-
matory reaction (14). The resulting inflammation af-
fects the root ganglion, namely, its nociceptive C
fibers, increasing their mechanical sensitivity and giv-
ing rise to a painful stimulus. This effect also occurs
by means of ephaptic transmission (i.e., functional
contact among neuron fibers in which impulses jump
to a contiguous inactive fiber not at the synapse but
across the membrane) in the apparent absence of             FIG 3. After intraforaminal infiltration, the gas mixture is distrib-
mechanical compression (15).                                uted between the posterior longitudinal ligament and the dural
   The rationale for anti-inflammatory treatment with       sheath.
AJNR: 26, May 2005                                                                       INFILTRATIONS FOR BACK PAIN                        999

                                                                        FIG 4. Infiltration of the gas mixture.
                                                                           A, Preliminary CT measurements of L4-L5 disk herniation on the
                                                                        left side.
                                                                           B, Correct positioning of the needle.
                                                                           C, Distribution of the gas mixture.

Results from short-, medium- and long-term follow-up

                                                       Outcome with O2-O3                                Outcome with Steroid

        Follow-Up and Patients             Excellent         Good              Poor          Excellent          Good              Poor

   Short term
     With disk disease (n ⫽ 166)          73 (84.8%)        8 (9.3%)         5 (5.9%)       64 (80%)          10 (12.5%)         8 (10%)
     Without disk disease (n ⫽ 160)       56 (80%)         11 (15.7%)        3 (4.3%)       55 (78.5%)         9 (12.8%)         5 (7.2%)
   Medium term
     With disk disease (n ⫽ 166)          67 (77.9%)        9 (10.5%)       10 (11.6%)      54 (67.5%)        14 (17.5%)        12 (15%)
     Without disk disease (n ⫽ 160)       55 (78.5%)        9 (12.9%)        6 (8.6%)       49 (70%)          10 (14.2%)        11 (15.8%)
   Long term
     With disk disease (n ⫽ 166)          64 (74.4%)        9 (10.5%)       13 (15.1%)      46 (57.5%)        16 (20%)          18 (22.5%)
     Without disk disease (n ⫽ 160)       53 (75.8%)       11 (15.7%)        6 (8.6%)       44 (62.8%)        11 (15.8%)        15 (21.4%)

   Note.—Data in parentheses are percentages. Short term ⫽ 1 week, medium term ⫽ 3 months, and long term ⫽ 6 months.

periganglionic steroid infiltration is the relief the                       Periganglionic steroid treatment by means of CT-
periganglionic inflammation by ensuring recovery of                      guided paraspinal infiltration is an effective tool for
the normal ganglioneural myelin sheath, and hence                        the relief of root pain caused by spondylosis or disk
nerve function, at the disease site (16, 17). The O2-O3                  herniation, but the effects appear to be short lived
gas mixture injected proximal to the root ganglion is                    (25, 26). This was particularly true in patients in the
thought to normalize the levels of cytokines and pros-                   disk-disease group, in whom the rate of excellent
taglandins, increase superoxide dismutase levels, min-                   outcomes fell from 80% in the short term to 57.6% at
imize reactive oxidant species, and improve local peri-                  long-term follow-up. A statistically significant trend,
ganglionic circulation with a eutrophic effect on the                    with a relatively smooth slope, was noted in patients
nerve root (15, 18, 19). This effect was especially                      with disk disease group treated with O2-O3 infiltra-
evident at short-term follow-up in patients without                      tion, in whom the rate of excellent outcomes de-
disk disease, roughly 80% of whom reported a clear                       creased from 84.8% at short-term follow-up to 74.4%
improvement in symptoms; this observation demon-                         at long-term follow-up (P ⫽ .0021).
strating that both treatments rapidly relieve nondiskal                     Furthermore, undesired severe reactions, such as
pain. Our medium- and long-term results marginally                       arachnoiditis, meningitis, paraparesis, paraplegia,
favored O2-O3 treatment, especially in patients with                     sensory disorders, bowel/bladder dysfunction, head-
painful disk disease.                                                    ache and epilepsy, after steroid administration should
1000      BONETTI                                                                                                      AJNR: 26, May 2005

also be considered (20 –24). Although these major                         9. Grant G. Primary afferent projections to the spinal cord. In: The Rat
adverse effects were not encountered in our series,                          Nervous System. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press;1995:61–66
                                                                         10. Siddall PJ, Cousins MJ. Spine update: spinal pain mechanism.
a certain percentage of the drug is nonetheless                              Spine 1997;22:98 –104
metabolized.                                                             11. O’Donnell J. Prostaglandin E2 content in herniated lumbar disc
   Our most interesting finding was the increase in the                      disease. Spine 1997;21:1653–1656
number of patient with disk disease (disk-induced                        12. Kawakami M, Tamaki T. The role of phospholipase A2 and nitric
                                                                             oxide in pain related behavior produced by an allograft of inter-
pain) who reported an improvement in symptoms.                               vertebral disc material to the sciatic nerve of the rat. Spine
This finding supports other evidence that O2-O3 in-                          1997;22:1074 –1079
filtration affects not only the symptoms but also the                    13. Saal JS, Franson RC, Dobrow R, et al. High levels of inflammatory
cause of pain by accelerating the natural recovery                           phospholipase A2 activity in lumbar disc herniations. Spine
                                                                             1990;15:674 – 678
mechanism of disk herniation (27).                                       14. Group M, Stanton-Hicks M. Neuroanatomy and physiology of pain
                                                                             related to spinal disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 1991;29:665– 673
                                                                         15. Vanderlinden R. Subarticular entrapment of the dorsal root gan-
                          Conclusion                                         glia as a cause of sciatic pain. Spine 1984;9:19 –22
   To our knowledge, no biochemical evidence sug-                        16. Wall PD, Devor M. Sensory afferent impulses originate from dor-
gests short or long-term adverse effects linked to O3                        sal root ganglia as well as from periphery in normal and nerve
administration, and O2-O3 treatment has proved                               injured rats. Pain 1983;17:321–339
                                                                         17. Weinstein J. Mechanisms of spinal pain: the dorsal root ganglion
highly effective in relieving acute and chronic low                          and its role as a mediator of low back pain. Spine 1986;11:999 –1001
back pain and sciatica. Therefore, we suggest the                        18. Fields H. Les voies de la douleur dans le système nerveux central.
administration of the gas mixture as a first-choice                          In: Douleur. Paris: Medsi/McGraw-Hill;1987:12–118
treatment to replace epidural steroid infiltration to                    19. McCarron RF, Wimpee MW, Hudgkins PG, et al. The inflamma-
                                                                             tory effect of the nucleus pulposus. Spine 1987;12:759 –764
avoid surgery.                                                           20. Bonetti M, Cotticelli B, Raimondi D, et al. Ossigeno-ozono terapia
                                                                             vs infiltrazioni epidurali cortisoniche. Rivista di Neuroradiologia
                                                                             2000;13:203–206
                          References                                     21. Dougherty JH, Fraser RAR. Complications involving intraspinal
1. Czervionke LF. Lumbar intervertebral disc disease. Neuroimag              injections of steroids. Neurosurgery 1978;48:1023–1025
   Clin North Am 1993;3:465– 485                                         22. Rovira E, Garcia EM, Catala J, Garcia J. Chronic adhesive arach-
2. Davis RA. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated          noiditis following epidural paramethasone. Rev Neurol 1997;25:
   herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 1994;80:415– 421                      2067–2068
3. Iliakis E. Ozone treatment in low back pain. Orthopaedics             23. Manfrè L. Trattamento della lombosciatalgia acuta e cronica con
   1995;1:29 –33                                                             infiltrazione perigangliare di steroide. Rivista di Neuroradiologia
4. Andreula CF, Simonetti L, De Santis F, et al. Minimally invasive          2001;14:43– 46
   oxygen-ozone therapy for lumbar disk herniation. AJNR Am J            24. Cyteval C, Thomas E, Decoux E, et al.: Cervical radiculopathy:
   Neuroradiol 2003;24:996 –1000
                                                                             open study on percutaneous periradicular foraminal steroid infil-
5. Andreula CF. Ernie discali lombosacrali e patologia degenerativa
                                                                             tration performed under CT control in 30 patients. AJNR Am J
   correlate: trattamento interventistico spinale con chemiodiscolisi
                                                                             Neuroradiol 2004;25:441– 445
   con nucleoptesi con O3 e infiltrazione periradicolare e perigangli-
   onare. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 2001;14:81– 88                      25. Castagnera L, Maurette P, Pontillart V, et al. Long-term results of
6. Bozzao A, Gallucci M, Aprile I, Mastrantuono M. Evoluzione                cervical epidural steroid injection with and without morphine in
   spontanea dell’ernia discale nei pazienti trattati con terapia non        chronic cervical radicular pain. Pain 1994;58:239 –242
   chirurgica. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 1993;6:267–273                 26. Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW, Booth RE, et al. The use of
7. Fabris G, Tomassini G, Lavaroni A. Percutaneous treatment of              epidural steroids in the treatment of radicular pain. J Bone Joint
   lumbar herniated disk. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 1997;10:13–22           Surg Am 1985;67:63– 66
8. Zennaro H, Dousset V, Viaud B, et al. Periganglionic foraminal        27. Fabris G, Tommasini Gl. Percutaneous treatment of lumbar her-
   steroid injections performed under CT control. AJNR Am J Neu-             niated disk. 10 years of experience in Udine. Rivista di Neuroradio-
   roradiol 1998;19:349 –352                                                 logia 1997;10:523–532
You can also read