LCA STUDY, CARBON FOOTPRINT AND GOOD PRACTICES IMPLEMENTED
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
INDEX: 1. Background 1.1. LCA 1.2. Carbon Footprint 2. Impact updating 2.1. CO2 emissions balance 2.2. Economic balance 3. Action plan to reduce emissions in a technical – economic way 3.1. Actions in cultivation processes 3.2. In the production processes of olive polyphenols 3.3. In grinding and use of by-product processes 4. Conclusions and calculations 4.1. Recalculation of CO2 emissions after improvements. 4.2. Conclusions and indicators monitoring
1. Background Allotarra Association of Ecological Agriculture and Livestock, entity linked to Biosasun, is made up of various farmers from Tierra Estella (Navarra) Its main activities are the practice and promotion of agricultural, livestock, commercial and professional activities. After cultivating organic olive trees for more than 30 years and its objective is to make organic farming and its sustainable processes available to all, always respecting the environment and its resources. https://ekodenda.allotarra.eu
1. Background BIOSASUN BIOSASUN S.A. It is located in Álava and Navarra. Founded in 2001 by the interest of various professionals in the production of organic products. www.biosasun.eu Marketing, distribution and Engineering, design and elaboration of ecological and advice on sustainable R&D projects functional products. solutions
1. Background BUSSINES ESTRATEGY Biotechnology for Based on strains purchased from third parties. We try to PROBIOTIC complement them with native strains, provided by technology production centers and universities in the nearby environment. (CNTA, UNAV, UPV/EHU etc). PREBIOTIC Based on polyphenol extract from own organic olive trees and, production in the future, from other plants. technologies COLLABORATIO N CHALLENGES LOOKING FOR Nanotechnology Lipid nanoparticles and nano-oxides for plant (Provided by CT L´Urederra) compounds encapsulation HEALTHY AND ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS WIDE EXPERIENCE CHALLENGES CONSUMER WASTE RECOVER LINKAGE
1. Background: 1.1. ACV Start - end date: January 2008 - December 2010 (RECYWASTEOLHIVA PROJECT) Objective: carry out the calculation of the ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL impacts of the classic production of extra virgin olive oil, in order to have an impact matrix to improve processes and make them more sustainable. Datos generales Matriz de valoración Residuos generados Tratamiento de Etapa 1 del Ciclo de vida Componentes de la Herramienta ACV Ecológica los residuos Producción Agrícola Consumos de Hoja de datos materias primas Etapa 2 del Ciclo de vida Generación de Transporte y Ecológica (KWh/TP) aguas residuales almacenamiento de MP Ecosocial (ht/TP) Económica (€/TP) Uso de Etapa 3 del Ciclo de vida agroquimicos Transformación y elaboración Etapa 4 del Ciclo de vida Almacenamiento y Contaminación de distribución suelos Ecológica Contaminación de Etapa 5 del Ciclo de vida Hoja de aire Consumo resultados Contaminación de agua Ecológica (KWh/TP) Etapa 6 del Ciclo de vida Ecosocial (ht/TP) Consumo de Post consumo Económica (€/TP) recursos naturales Resumen ACV
1. Background: 1.1. ACV Start date - end date: January 2008 - December 2010 (RECYWASTEOLHIVA PROJECT) Producción de olivas y Fabricación de Aceites Fases Transporte y Transformación, Producción Almacenamiento y Post- Impactos Almacenamiento elaboración, Consumo Agrícola Distribución consumo MP envasado,.. Principales 1. Incineración de podas 1. Consumo de 1. Consumo de 1. Vertido o tratamiento 2. Uso de fertilizantes combustibles combustibles fósiles Bajo nivel Tecnologías Ecológicos de Alperujos recogida de reciclaje nitrogenados en fósiles por Transporte selectiva inadecuadas dosis superiores a las 3. Pérdida de suelo absorbidas por las plantas 1. Consumo energético Laboreo para Precios alto Coste del Económicos eliminación de malas productos 2. Consumo de envases Transporte hierbas y embalajes ecológicos Eco- Accidentes en Accidentes de Accidentes de Afecciones sociales maquinaria agrícola tráfico tráfico para la salud
1. Background: 1.2. Carbon Footprint CARBON FOOTPRINT OF CLASSIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING OLIVE OIL GHG emissions by stages of the product life cycle and and their contribution in percentage to the total Carbon Footprint. gr CO2 eq/ l aceite ETAPAS Botella Vidrio 500 ml PET 2L PET 5 L AGRICOLA 7.766,00 7.766,00 7.766,00 EXTRACCIÓN 3.813,51 3.813,51 3.813,51 ENVASADO 5.969,14 426,50 320,47 DISTRIBUCION 20,56 7,90 3,27 FIN DE VIDA 9,84 1,73 0,92 TOTAL 17.579 12.016 11.904 Glass bottle format contributes significantly to the final Carbon Footprint, reprsenting about 34% GHG emissions. This is due to the high energy consumption of glass bottles production. PET bottles should be considered as an essential alternative from a Carbon Footprint point of view.
2. Impact update: IMPROVEMENTS ALREADY MADE Continuous improvement of the practices of the olive grove in organic farming: Plant cover maintenance on farms. Chopped grass and choping pruning incorporation as organic amendment in the farms themselves Keeping pruning in the ground for a while for protection of the olive tree itself agains plagues. Maintenance of wild vegetation areas (borders, banks, ...) Concentrate phytosanitary treatments so as to minimize atmosphere emissions and fuel consumption during application. Use of Potassium Oleate manufactured with own oil residues Plant alfalfa and similar forage plants on farms with slopes to prevent erosion and fix nitrogen Controlled use of Milling and / or Alperujo Waters to control weeds in young olive groves
2. Impact update: IMPROVEMENTS ALREADY MADE Design and construction of sustainable facilities: Cleaner processes: Installation of our plant in an olive grove in the center and closest Adjustment of the different machinery to the productive point to the rest of the olive groves to minimize journeys. capacities Construction with recycled materials: marine containers and Adaptation of the olive groves to be collected with a construction houses vibrating umbrella, avoiding displacement for collection and Use of recyclable metal and wood materials collecting leaves for the use of polyphenols Minimization of the use of concrete in the Urbanization-facilities Zero waste water discharges: sanitary and cleaning waters Supporting containers and booths on the perimeter on recycled are collected in a septic tank, using these waters in the tires filled with concrete Collection of rainwater from the roofs for irrigation of the olive irrigation of compost and the olive grove, avoiding their grove discharge into a public channel Adjustment of the dimensions of the different enclosures to what Composting the organic waste generated in the different is necessarily essential for the proper functioning of the processesprocesses to incorporate it as an organic amendment in the olive grove Savings and Energy Efficiency: Orientation to the local and nearby market, avoiding the Installation of solar panels for self-consumption of energy, impacts caused by transport without network connection Label, back label and cardboard box weight adjustments Adaptation of a diesel electricity generator to work with propane. Elimination of the use of pasquinades in each of the installation of an automation system so that the generator starts containers operating when the batteries that accumulate solar energy are Change from a black bottle to a lower impact green bottle empty and the demand of the processes requires energy. Development of R&D projects to obtain clean processes Take advantage of the heat of the fumes generated by the energy and high added value products related to the world of generators for the drying of olive leaves and the pomace needed health, taking advantage of waste
2. Impact update: 2.1. CO2 Emissions balance ACTIVITIES INITIAL PRODUCTION METHODS DESCRIPTION INDICATORS/Kg olive - h TOTAL ENERGY Organic olive tree cultivation Kwh/year 86.435 CONSUMPTION Tranformation and manufacturing processes Kwh/year 144.819 TOTAL Kwh/year 231.254 Total CO2 initial agricultural production methods Kg CO2/Kg olive - leave 1,46 Total CO2 to obtain aqueous concentrates of Kg CO2/Kg leaves 3,69 olive polyphenols 5g / l PRODUCTION Grinding and whipped Kg CO2/Kg olive - leave 0,293 COSTS (€) Oil and water extraction in centrifugal decanter Kg CO2/Kg olive - leave 0,289 Decantation, storage and coupages in tanks Kg CO2/Kg olive- leave 0,128 Pomace pellets and use Kg CO2/Kg olive - leave 0,383 Product packaging - distribution - end of life Kg CO2/Kg olive - leave 0,29 TOTAL CO2 EMISSIONS Kg CO2/Kg olive - leaves 6,527 ECONOMIC CO2 ABSORTIONS Kg CO2/Kg olive - leaves 85,5 BALANCE (€/Kg CO2 NET BALANCE Kg CO2/kg olive – leaves -78,97 olive) CO2 TOTAL BALANCE (24,2ha – 2 t Olive- T CO2/year -3822 leave/ha)
2. Impact update: 2.2. Economic balance ACTIVITIES INITIAL PRODUCTION METHODS INDICATORS/Kg olive - h TOTAL DESCRIPTION Total CO2 initial agricultural production €/Kg olive - leave 0,81 methods Total CO2 to obtain aqueous concentrates of olive polyphenols 5g / l €/Kg olive - leave 6,56 PRODUCTION Grinding and whipped €/Kg olive - leave 0,08 COSTS Oil and water extraction in centrifugal €/Kg olive - leave 0,08 (€) decanter Decantation, storage and coupages in tanks €/Kg olive- leave 0,04 Pomace pellets and use €/Kg olive - leave 0,09 Product packaging - distribution - end of life €/Kg olive - leave 0,11 TOTAL PRODUCTION COSTS €/Kg olive - leave 7,77 Oil sales income €/Kg olive – leave equiv. 1,05 ECONOMIC Pellet sale income €/Kg olive – leave equiv. 0,25 BALANCE (€/Kg Income sale of aqueous olive polyphenols 16 €/Kg olive – leave equiv. olive) concentrates 5 g / l Total income € / kg olive-leaves 17,05 Net margins € / kg olive-leaves 9,27
3. Action plan for the reduction of emissions in a technical-economic way : 3.1. In cultivation processes 2019 2020 2021 ACCIONES A REALIZAR OBJETIVOS 2do Trim. 3er Trim. 4to Trim. 1er Trim. 2do Trim. 3er Trim. 4to Trim. 1er Trim. 2do Trim. PROCESOS DE CULTIVO Modificaciónes a Introducir en la Operación de Poda de Invierno: Corte de Ramas más grandes cada dos años mediante motosierra y tijeras eléctricas Reducir tiempos y mejorar follaje Dejar ramas en el centro de la calle y troncos gruesos bajo la sombra del olivo Recoger, triturar y producir pellets Alimentación de cabras y ovejas: Recogida con narria de ramas y transporte a ganadero Directo-Pienso Recogida manual de ramas y transporte a Biosasun Extracción de Polifenoles Trituración de Ramas no recogidas con picadora Fertilización y eliminación parasitos Nuevas Actividades para el Control de Malas Hierbas Aplicación de Aguas de molturación cada 4 años Reducir hierbas y reciclar aguas Sustituir la Labor ligera de cultivador por otra con narria 2 veces/año Reducir el consumo Energético Cosecha mezcladas con ramón y Años de no poda siembra de cereales/leguminosas/… alimentación de ovejas-fertilización Mejora de la Fertilización Aplicación manual debajo árboles de 4T/Ha de compost cada 4 años Reducir costes actuales
3. Action plan for the reduction of emissions in a technical-economic way : 3.2. In the production processes of olive polyphenols 2019 2020 2021 ACCIONES A REALIZAR OBJETIVOS 2do Trim. 3er Trim. 4to Trim. 1er Trim. 2do Trim. 3er Trim. 4to Trim. 1er Trim. 2do Trim. PROCESOS DE PRODUCCIÓN DE POLIFENOLES DE OLIVO Preparación de las Instalaciones y Equipamientos Sistema de limpieza de frutos, hojas, alperujos para extracción de polifenoles Aprovechar Hojas Equipos periféricos sinfín elevador orujo, tolva alperujo, sinfín tubo alimentación alperujo yProcesar depósitos también de recogida alperujo de líquidos. Sistema de separación mecánica de los restos de aguas y aceites Aprovechar Aguas de Molturación Automatización arranque automático y mejora sistema actual de cargador fotovoltaico Aprovecha mejor Energía Solar Separar aceites Aguas conpolifenoles Sistema de separación y recuperación de frutos, hojas, alperujos y residuos y producción orujo Depósitos con control de atmósfera Evitar oxidaciones Generador recuperación calor humos secado Reducir consumo-emisiones Control masa, caudal y temperatura Mejorar la calidad de los productos Recepción, selección y Lavado de la oliva y Hojas y ramitas Pulverizado de agua “duchas” en la recepción, si fuera necesario lavar Redudir consumo de agua al 50% Trituración de hojas secas para Proceso de Molienda Recoger mejor y más barato Utilización de hojas de recolección de olivas para secado directo Eliminar recogida manual de hojas Preparación de hojas para la extración Uso directo de Hojas en saco filtrante para concentraciones no muy altas Reducir tiempos operación Molienda de Hojas y extracción en centrífuga de polifenoles Lograr alta concentración Polifenol Extracción Pasterización Introducción de hojas en un recipiente con agua de molturación (AM) Aprovechar AM con polifenoles Calentamiento a 105ºC durante un mínimo de 20 minutos en Recipiente a Presión Pasterizaión directa Proceso de evaporación en 4 horas Reducir tiempo-consumo-emisión Separación de las hojas sacando el Saco filtrante Liempieza y menor tiempo Sustituir proceso de Liofilización por Destilación a vacío Reducir a menos de la mitad Ejecución del proceso de Destilación: Calentamiento-Vacio-Evaporación consumos y emisiones Evitar la pasterización por terceros Reducir costes y emisiones
3. Action plan for the reduction of emissions in a technical-economic way : 3.3. In grinding and use of by-product processes 2019 2020 2021 ACCIONES A REALIZAR OBJETIVOS 2do Trim. 3er Trim. 4to Trim. 1er Trim. 2do Trim. 3er Trim. 4to Trim. 1er Trim. 2do Trim. PROCESOS DE MOLIENDA Y DE APROVECHAMIENTO DE SUBPRODUCTOS Preparación de las Instalaciones y Equipamientos Instalacion de Pelletizadora, ensacadora y apiladora. Pelletizar orujo, serrín y piensos Construcción de Secadero adicional: Pérgola para secado, elaboración y almacenaje Secar el Orujo y pellets Sistema de separación y recuperación de frutos, hojas, alperujos y residuos Separar aceites-polifenoles y orujo Generador recuperación calor humos secado Reducir consumo, emisiones Molienda y Batido Reducir consumo, emisiones Recirculación de Aguas de Molturación de Tanque Decanter a Batidora sobre el 50% Concentrar Polifenoles en las Aguas Introducción Alternativa de Hoja-Orujo+Aguas de Molturación (AM) finales a valorizar Extracción del aceite y aguas en “Decanter Centrifugo” Introdución de Aguas de Molturación en el Decanter Concentrar Polifenoles en las AM Envío de Aguas de Molturación preconcetrada a Depósitos 1º ó 2º Concentrar Polifenoles en las AM Salida de Orujo a zona de Pellets Valorizar el orujo como Pellets Decantación, almacenamiento y coupages en depósitos Decantación de Aceites en Depósitos Primarios Reducir consumo, emisiones Coupages de aceites de oliva directos con otros aceites Concentrar polifenoles en Aceites Concentración y Pasterización de Aguas de Molturación 2º Depósito en Deposito Final Reducir consumo, emisiones y con hojas, mediante calor residual concentrar Polifenoles Mezclado de Orujo con Aguas de Molturación en Batidora Recuperar aceites y polifenoles Envío de Aguas de Molturación a Control de Malas Hierbas Adaptar producción-mercado Orujos pelletizado y aprovechamiento Secado de Orujo con calores residuales en Secadero Solar Reducir consumo y emisiones Mezclado de orujo con serrines o Ramón con Avena/Cebada Producir Pellets o Piensos Pelletizado de Orujo-Serrín ó Ramón-Avena/cebada Producir Pellets o Piensos Ensacado de Pellet o Pienso en sacos de 15 Kg Valorizar el orujo como Pellets Alternetiva Reprocesado de Orujo Adaptar producción-mercado Alternativa Uso del Orujo Para Compots-Fertilización A1 Adaptar producción-mercado Envasado de los productos Sustituir botellas de vidrio por otros envases de menor HC Reducir emisiones
4. Conclusions and calculations: 4.1. Recalculation of CO2 emissions after improvements. NEW EKO-PRODUCTION METHODS DESCRIPTION INDICATORS/Kg olive - h TOTAL Total CO2 initial agricultural production methods Kg de CO2/Kg olive - leaves 0,38 Total CO2 to obtain aqueous concentrates of olive Kg de CO2/Kg leaves 1,44 polyphenols 5g / l Grinding and whipped Kg de CO2/Kg olive - leaves 0,231 Oil and water extraction in centrifugal decanter Kg de CO2/Kg olive - leaves 0,205 Decantation, storage and coupages in tanks Kg de CO2/Kg olive – leaves 0,080 Pomace pellets and use Kg de CO2/Kg olive – leaves 0,265 Product packaging - distribution - end of life Kg de CO2/Kg olive – leaves 0,29 CO2 total emissions Kg de CO2/Kg olive – leaves 2,894 CO2 absorption Kg de CO2/Kg olive – leaves 85,5 CO2 net balance Kg de CO2/Kg olive - leaves -82,61 CO2 total balance (40 Ha – 2 t olive – leave/Ha) t CO2/year -6608 CO2 emissions reduction: CO2 emissions balance improvement: 29% 56%
4. Conclusions and calculations: 4.2. Conclusions Regarding CO2 emissions of the different Regarding production costs of the processes in olive processes: circular economy: Emissions from the manufacture of glass containers are High profitability of the production of olive polyphenol relatively high, compared to the set of olive production concentrates must be transferred to boost this organic operations, so it is highly recommended to replace this production sector, influencing these aspects: type of bottle with PET containers or others with less Promote entry into the Cosmetic and Food Ingredients impact. markets, achieving a gradual and logical growth, since Emission reduction in the whole olive growing processes otherwise, the use of the remains of pruning, milling, ..., is due to the integration of the processes and the recovery would hardly allow maintaining a reduced profitability of of all by-products under the concept of circular economy. the set of activities: Agricultural and industrial of This can represent a significant reduction in emissions of transformation. more than 50% globally. Taking into account the absorption of CO2 by olive trees Maintain prices similar to those we have outlined, that themselves (570 Kg CO2 per centennial olive tree and year) do not plummet, when this type of application becomes lead us to persist in the objective of protecting and widespread. promoting ecological cultivation of Arroniz variety in our Limited profitability of the production and sale of Extra Virgin environment. It manages a net absorption of more than 80 Olive Oils. Organic market prices, maintains the activity thanks Kg of CO2 per Kg of product put on the market. to the CAP. Viability of promoting both activities, which are essential to be carried out together to reduce emissions and costs to levels that allow high profitability, greater than 30. This should allow for the expansion of this type of crops and the maintenance of their ecosystems in Navarra. EFSA: “the polyphenols in olive oil contribute to the protection of blood lipids against oxidative damage”
4. Conclusions and calculations: 4.2. Indicators monitoring Indicators comparison Indicators Absolut impact Objectives 31-12-2019 31-12-2021 6,5 Kg CO2/Kg olive-leaves 2,9 Kg CO2/Kg olive-leaves GHG emissions CO2 -78 Kg CO2/ Kg olive-leaves -82 Kg CO2/Kg olive-leaves Max 3.476 TCO2/year Max 6.036 TCO2/year Improving Hazardous environmental substances 284,85 Kg/Ha - year 15,35 Kg/Ha - year Toxic Reduction / performance Substitution 10.262,94 Kg/ year 594,81 Kg/year Waste reuse Made: 120 Kg 3.150 Kg/Ha - year Waste management Substances recover Potential: 29 T 122.062 Kg/year Raw materials for Better use of cosmetics 20 Kg 2,2 T/year natural Resources replaced Raw materials for 100 kg 8,7 T/year by By-products organic food resources Raw materials for 65,3 T/year fertilizers Water consumption Water 2.636 m3/year 2.087 m3/year reduction 4,8 Kw-h/Kg olive-leaves 2,7 Kw-h/Kg olive-leaves Energy Energy consumption Max 231 Mw-h/year Max 217 Mw-h/year reduction
4. Conclusions and calculations: 4.2. Indicators monitoring Indicators comparison Indicators Absolut Impact Objectives 31-12-2019 31-12-2021 Market replication Initial replication 24,2 Has 40-50 Has Economic Market size 0,21 M€ 1,59 M€ Performance/ Potential market Market Market size 2.000 consumers 91.120 consumers (Final clients) Replication New transnational markets entry Europe Europe America Food, self – fertilization, cosmetic – New sectors entry Food, Self - fertilization pharmaceutical, energy Aqueous concentrate 5g/l PT 58 % Others Cost reduction per unit or process Dried powder 150 g/Kg PT 66% Leaf powder 130 g/Kg PT 6% Invented capital / net Payback Time 20 years 5 years income Europe 2 Industrial secrets 1 patent + 3 secrets Patents Out of the UE 3 patents
THANK YOU VERY MUCH MERCI BEAUCOUP MUCHAS GRACIAS ESKERRIK ASKO
You can also read