Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures Economics after the crisis: Objectives and means Lecture III - Economic Freedom, Public Policy and the Discipline ...

 
CONTINUE READING
Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures Economics after the crisis: Objectives and means Lecture III - Economic Freedom, Public Policy and the Discipline ...
Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures
   Economics after the crisis: Objectives and means

                        Lecture III
Economic Freedom, Public Policy and the Discipline of
                       Economics

                      Adair Turner

                   London School of Economics
                        13 October 2010

                                                        0
Starting Point: The Instrumental Conventional Wisdom

  Free           Allocative                            Human
                                     Growth
 markets         efficiency                            happiness

  Free
 markets         Inequality: Justified because it helps deliver growth

                                                                         1
Happiness and income per capita in the USA

Source: Bruno Frey & Alois Stutzer, Happiness and Economics, Princeton University Press, 2002
                                                                                                2
Income and Human Contentment:
Possible stylised pattern over time

                        Pre-industrial societies         The Great Transformation
 Income / Contentment

                                                                              Income
                                                                Developed
                                                                economies

                                                                            Human wellbeing
                                                                            contentment / happiness

                                                               China

                                                      Africa

                                     Economic and technological
                                             progress

                                                                                              3
Three distinct reasons why relative income matters

   1. Rising
     expenditure on           Concern for relative
     fashion and              status in itself
     branded goods                                        Higher
                                                         relative
                                                         income
                                                        increases
                                                                    Happiness
2. Increased competition       Relative income          happiness
                                                                    a function
  for inherently limited       influences absolute                   of others’
  supply positional goods      living standard                      income as
                                                                      well as
                                                                        own

                              Rising average incomes
3. Congestion externalities   degrade quality of some
                              forms of consumption

                                                                           4
“Distributive” versus “creative” activities

                  “Creative”                          Increasing the net real
                                                       income available for
                                                       consumption

                  “Distributive”                      Winning increasing
                                                       income at expense of
                                                       others

Source: See Roger Bootle, The Trouble with Markets, chapters 4 and 5

                                                                                 5
Health and social problems

                                                               Income Inequality

Source: Wilkinson & Pickett, The Spirit Level , Penguin 2009
                                                                                   6
USA debt as a % of GDP by borrower type

             300%

             250%                                                                                                        Corporate

             200%
                                                                                                                         Household
             150%

             100%
                                                                                                                         Financial
              50%
              10%
                                                                        1971

                                                                               1977

                                                                                                    1996
                                                          1959
                                                                 1965

                                                                                      1983
                                                                                             1990

                                                                                                           2002
                       1929
                              1935

                                     1941

                                                                                                                  2007
                                            1947

                                                   1953

Source: Oliver Wyman

                                                                                                                                     7
Global issuance of Collateralised Debt Obligations:
        Cash and synthetic

        300
                       Synthetic
        250            Cash

        200
  $bn

        150

        100

         50

           0
                 1995      1996      1997       1998   1999   2000   2001   2002   2003   2004   2005

Source: IMF Global Financial Stability Report, 2006

                                                                                                        8
Complete markets as a route to…

  … efficiency                                  … and stability

 Credit derivatives “enhance the                “There is a growing recognition
 transparency of the markets’                   that the dispersion of credit risk
 collective view of credit risks..              by banks to a broader and more
 [and thus]… provide valuable                   diverse group of investors has
 information about broad credit                 helped make the banking and
 conditions and increasingly set                overall financial system more
 the marginal rice of credit.                   resilient …
 Therefore, such activity improves              The improved resilience may be
 market discipline”                             seen in fewer bank failures and
                                                more consistent credit provision”.

                  IMF, Global Financial Stability Review, April 2006

                                                                                     9
Share of the financial industry in US GDP

                                                                                                          %
                                                                                                               9
                                                                                                               8
                                                                                                               7
                                                                                                               6
                                                                                                               5
                                                                                                               4
                                                                                                               3
                                                                                                               2
                                                                                                               1
                                                                                                               0
                    1850                         1910
                   1850
                     50         70         90      1910
                                                     10          30         50         70         90
Source: Philippon, T (2008), The Evolution of the US Financial Industry from 1860 to 2007: Theory and Evidence. (As referenced
by Andrew Haldane in The Future of Finance, LSE Report, 2010)

                                                                                                                                 10
Historical 'excess' wage in the US financial sector

                                                                                                  'Excess' wage
                                                                                                        0.5

                                                                                                         0.4

                                                                                                         0.3

                                                                                                         0.2

                                                                                                         0.1
                                                                                                               +

                                                                                                         0.0   -

              1910                                                                               2000
                                                                                                         0.1
               1910                                                                       2000
Source: Philippon,10
                   11
                   T12
                     13
                      15
                       16
                     and17
                         18
                          20
                           21
                            22
                             23
                              25
                         Reshef 26
                                A27
                                  28
                                   30
                                    31
                                     32
                                      33
                                       35
                                        36
                                  (2009). 37
                                           38
                                            40
                                             41
                                              42
                                          Wages43
                                                45
                                                 46
                                                  47
                                                and48
                                                    50
                                                     51
                                                      52
                                                       53
                                                        55
                                                    Humal 56
                                                           57
                                                            58
                                                             60
                                                              61
                                                               6263
                                                           Capital6566
                                                                   in6768
                                                                        70
                                                                      the71
                                                                          72
                                                                           73
                                                                          US75
                                                                             76
                                                                              77
                                                                               78
                                                                                80
                                                                                 81
                                                                                  8283
                                                                                     85
                                                                             Financial 86
                                                                                        87
                                                                                         88
                                                                                          90
                                                                                           91
                                                                                            9293
                                                                                               95
                                                                                       Industry: 96
                                                                                                  97
                                                                                                   98
                                                                                                    00
                                                                                                     01
                                                                                                      02
                                                                                                       03
                                                                                                        05 NBER Working Paper
                                                                                                 1909-2006,
No 14644.A. Resh (As referenced by Andrew Haldane in The Future of Finance, LSE Report, 2010)

                                                                                                                           11
 Growth not the objective but by-product of other
  desirable objectives

 Policy implications

 Implications for the discipline of economics

                                                     12
The case for growth

   Growth in low and middle income countries

   The poor in rich countries

   Economic regression in absence of markets

   The journey, not the destination

   Economic freedom as an end per se
                   +
     Avoidance of involuntary unemployment

                                                13
The internally contradicted argument

   Economic growth in rich countries still matters because it
    matters to poorer citizens

   Economic growth is maximised by significant inequalities /
    incentives

   Therefore don’t worry if economic growth is combined with
    increasing inequality

                                                                 14
The case for growth

   Growth in low and middle income countries

   The poor in rich countries

   Economic regression in absence of markets

   The journey, not the destination

   Economic freedom as an end per se and avoidance of
    involuntary unemployment

                                                         15
Keynes, The General Theory

      “There is social and psychological justification for
      significant inequalities of incomes and wealth…
      … dangerous human proclivities can be canalised into
      comparatively harmless channels by the existence of
      opportunities for money-making and private wealth
      which, if they cannot be satisfied in this way, may find
      their outlet in cruelty, the reckless pursuit of personal
      power and authority, and other forms of self-
      aggrandisement. It is better that a man should tyrannise
      over his bank balance than over his fellow citizens.”

                                                 (Chapter 24)

                                                                  16
The case for growth

   Growth in low and middle income countries

   The poor in rich countries

   Economic regression in absence of markets

   The journey, not the destination

   Economic freedom as an end per se and avoidance of
    involuntary unemployment

                                                         17
Happiness, income and changing aspirations

                                                   Aspiration 1

                                                   Aspiration 2
Happiness

                    2            3                 Aspiration 3
              1
                                 Flat line of long-term happiness

                        Income

                                                                    18
The case for growth

   Growth in low and middle income countries

   The poor in rich countries

   Economic regression in absence of markets

   The journey, not the destination

   Economic freedom as an end per se and avoidance of
    involuntary unemployment

                                                         19
Amartya Sen, “Freedom as Development”

      “… the freedom of people to act as they choose in
      deciding where to work, what to produce, what to
      consume…”

      “The merit of the market system does not lie only in
      its capacity to generate more efficient culmination
      outcomes but also in the processes by which those
      outcomes are achieved”

                         (Chapter 1, The Perspective of Freedom)

                                                                   20
 Growth not the objective but by-product of other
  desirable objectives

 Policy implications

 Implications for the discipline of economics

                                                     21
Four clear policy implications

   Maximise stability and minimise downsides
     • Financial regulation and macro-economic management
       • Climate change mitigation

   Maximise public choice: especially at local level

   Minimise positional goods competition
     • Welcome population stabilisation

                                                            22
Happiness, already achieved income, and changing
aspirations

                                          Plus:
Happiness

                                          Happiness as
            1   2     3            4
                                          function of
                                          relative as well as
                                          absolute income

                          Income

                                                                23
Do we “need to grow” to afford public expenditure?

   Health                 In general no, if main cost is
                           salaries which rise proportionally
                           with average GDP per capita
   Education

   Debt servicing         Yes, if macro-instability or fiscal
                           profligacy generate high stock of
                           debt relative to GDP

                                                                 24
Costs and benefits of higher capital and liquidity standards

Possible costs to GDP growth
• Long-term?                           Vs        Benefits of reduced probability
• Transitional                                             of negative setbacks

           Standard evaluation techniques
             • Compare costs & benefits using a discount rate which accords
                equal weight (in any given year) to costs and benefits

           Consequence: will undervalue stability and over-value minor
            increments to growth, if people highly value already achieved
            wealth/income and avoided unemployment, and deeply dislike
            setbacks

                                                                                   25
Estimating GDP

Measured value of
                          Long-term trends and
financial services?
                           cross-country
                           comparisons between
   Distributive rent       rich countries have
  extracting versus
                                                    Lionel Robbins:
                           uncertain meaning
“creative” activities                               “both the concept of
                                                    world money income
                                                    and of national
    Increasing % of                                 money income have
 income devoted to        Annual or quarterly      strict significance
housing         house      changes are crucial      only for monetary
    prices increase:       guide to inflation       theory”
     inflation or real     targeting and
             income?       economic stabilisation

                                                                    26
Four clear policy implications

   Maximise stability and minimise downsides
     • Financial regulation and macro-economic management
       • Climate change mitigation

   Maximise public choice: especially at local level

   Minimise positional goods competition
     • Welcome population stabilisation

                                                            27
Growth in UK living standards: with 80% emissions cut

                  GDP per capita 2006=100

     300
    338

     225                                                1.0 – 2.0%
                                                        lower

     150

    100
      75

       0
           2006   2020     2030           2040   2050
                           Business as usual
                           80% emissions cut

                                                                     28
Costs of climate change

   Conceptually clear – but difficult to quantify, e.g.
    changes in agricultural yields

   Inherently uncertain
      • Contingent social and political responses

   Small probability catastrophic losses

                                                           29
The impact of discount rates

                                       Assuming 2% per
                    £1000 in 2150    annum growth: 100 %
  Discounted          is worth      of GDP in 2150 is worth

     at 4% real     £3.67 today     6% of GDP today

     at 2% real     £59 today       100% of GDP today

                                                              30
Discount rate and declining marginal utility

 r = η (g) + δ

 η = the elasticity of the marginal
     utility of consumption

                                                   Utility
 g = growth rate

 δ = the rate of pure time                                   Consumption

    preference

 Stern’s base case η = 1      g = 1.9   δ = 0.1   r = 2.0%

The flatter the curve becomes, the higher η, and the higher the discount rate

                                                                            31
Happiness already Achieved Income and Changing
Aspirations

                                         Plus:
Happiness

                                         Happiness as
            1   2    3            4
                                         function of
                                         relative as well as
                                         absolute income

                         Income

                                                               32
Three problems with the standard discount rate approach

 Losers in future may be          Discount rate should be
  poorer than rich big             negative
  emitters today

 Small probability of             Discount rate applied to
  catastrophic losses              those losses should be
                                   negative

 Losses of
  environmental goods –            Gains of economic income
  species, beauty,                 cannot offset environmental
  diversity – valued in            losses
  themselves

                                                              33
Four clear policy implications

   Maximise stability and minimise downsides
     • Financial regulation and macro-economic management
       • Climate change mitigation

   Maximise public choice: especially at local level

   Minimise positional goods competition
     • Welcome population stabilisation

                                                            34
Four clear policy implications

   Maximise stability and minimise downsides
     • Financial regulation and macro-economic management
       • Climate change mitigation

   Maximise public choice: especially at local level

   Minimise positional goods competition
     • Welcome population stabilisation

                                                            35
Population growth and stabilisation: UN medium projections

            World population (bn)                                 EU 27 and UK population (m)
   9.5                                          9.2
   9.0                                  8.8           600

   8.5                          8.3                   500
   8.0
                                                            495     513      519     520         515
                   7.7
                                                      400
   7.5
   7.0                                                300

   6.5                                                200
          6.5
   6.0
                                                      100   60      65       68       70         72
   5.5
   5.0                                                  -
   2005         2020        2030      2040    2050      2005
                                                       2005         2020
                                                                    2020     2030
                                                                            2030      2040
                                                                                     2040        2050
                                                                                                2050

Source: UN Medium Projections

                                                                                                 36
Four clear policy implications

      Maximise stability and minimise downsides
        • Financial regulation and macro-economic management
           • Climate change mitigation

      Maximise public choice: especially at local level

      Minimise positional goods competition
        • Welcome population stabilisation

Overall Objective: Creating a stable environment in which freedom to choose
  can be allowed expression while minimising downside consequences and
                                  setbacks
                                                                         37
Two unclear issues

  1. Are some goods / services more important to human
     wellbeing / happiness than others – even when counted
     equally in GDP?

  2. How much inequality is fair / optimal / unavoidable?

                                                             38
Different marginal utility of different “goods”
Utility / Happiness

                                         Utility / Happiness

                                                                                Utility / Happiness
                           Income                                   Income                                Income

                                                                                                      Congestion and
                                                                  Branded                              environmental
                       Good health?                            fashion goods?                            damage?

                                                                                                                   39
40
Sub-optimal consumption choices

   Goods consumed as a result of public choice

   Social mores, herd-like fashion, and advertising

   Congestion and environmental externalities

                                                       41
Two unclear issues

  1. Are some goods / services more important to human
     wellbeing / happiness than others – even when counted
     equally in GDP?

  2. How much inequality is fair / optimal / unavoidable?

                                                             42
How much inequality?

The instrumental   Inequality is justified because and to the extent that it
  justification    delivers growth which delivers wellbeing; low taxation
                   rates incentivise effort and entrepreneurship

  The reality

     Relative income matters
     Standard responses inadequate
                – Growth
                – Skills
                – Opportunity
     Relative status competition invalidates standard incentive theory
     Economic freedom, and even perceived fairness, imply significant
      inequality

                                                                               43
 Growth not the objective but by-product of other
  desirable objectives

 Policy implications

 Implications for the discipline of economics

                                                     44
Economics in the dock

       Prosecution                                         Defence

 Assumption of rationality                        Always recognised
                                                    imperfections
 Mathematicisation: “physics
  envy”                                            Never monolithic
 Focus on market completion                             • Mirrlees, Stiglitz, Akerlof
  and equilibrium                                        • Kahneman

 Lack of enquiry about end                              • Sen
  objectives                                       Never said growth (rather
                                                    than welfare) was objective
Prosecutors:
Robert Skidelski Keynes: “The Return of the Master”
John Cassidy: “How Markets Fail”

                                                                                         45
From Arrow-Debreu to the Washington Consensus:
Three simplifications

    Downplay of severity of market imperfections

    From Pareto equilibrium to good outcome – even
     without redistribution

    From equilibrium to growth as the objective

                                                      46
Economics for the real world, not for ease of modelling

  Objectives
                      Is happiness the objective? Or welfare? Or freedom?
                      How are they related to each other, and to income?
                      Can we measure happiness or welfare?

    Means
                      Inherent failures of complex markets
                      Consequences of human mental processes – part
                       rational, part instinctive
                      Inherent irreducible uncertainty, not mathematically
                       modellable probability distributions

                                                                          47
Keynes on economics

       “economics is a moral and not a natural science”

                            ***
      “no part of man’s nature or his institutions must be
            entirely outside [the economist’s] regard”

                            ***
          The economist should be “mathematician,
          historian, statesman and philosopher in some
                             degree”

                                                             48
“Economics deals with ascertainable facts: ethics with
valuations and obligations. The two field of enquiring are not on
the same plane of discourse”
                              (Lionel Robbins, On the Nature and Significance of
                                       Economic Science, 1932, P.132)

“As against Robbins, Economics is essentially a moral science.
That is to say, it employs introspection and judgement of value”

                                (John Maynard Keynes, Letter to Roy Harrod)

                                                                             49
Lionel Robbins: Essay on the Nature and Significance of
 Economic Science

       “Both the concept of world money income and of national income
              money have strict significance only for monetary theory”

                                    ***
          “There is no penumbra of approbation around the theory of
                    equilibrium. Equilibrium is just equilibrium”

                                    ***
         “It is highly desirable that the economist who wishes that the
              application of his science should be fruitful should be fully
              qualified in cognate disciplines and should be prepared to
                                invoke their assistance”

                                    ***
“There is nothing in economics which absolves us of the obligation to choose”

                                                                              50
You can also read