PETONE COMMUNITY BOARD - 18 February 2019
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
PETONE COMMUNITY BOARD
13 February 2019
Order Paper for the meeting to be held in the
Petone Library, 7 Britannia Street, Petone,
on:
Monday 18 February 2019 commencing at 6.30pm
Membership
Pam Hanna (Chair) Mike Fisher (Deputy Chair)
Mason Branch Brady Dyer
Peter Foaese Karen Yung
Cr Tui Lewis Cr Michael Lulich
For the dates and times of Council Meetings please visit www.huttcity.govt.nz
COMMUNITY BOARDS – FUNCTIONS AND DELEGATIONS
This document records the delegation of Council functions, responsibilities, duties, and
powers to Community Boards.
The Community Boards have been established under section 49 of the Local Government Act
2002 to represent, and act as an advocate for, the interests of their community.
The delegations are expressed in general terms. The delegations shall be exercised with
proper regard for the Council’s strategic direction, policies, plans, Standing Orders and its
interpretation of its statutory obligations. The delegations are to be read together with the
following propositions.
These delegations are based on the following principles:
Issues relevant to a specific community should be decided as closely as possible to that
community. Where an issue has city-wide implications, ie any effects of the decision
cross a ward or community boundary or have consequences for the city as a whole, the
matter will be decided by Council after seeking a recommendation from the relevant
Community Board or (any ambiguity around the interpretation of “city-wide” will be
determined by the Mayor and Chief Executive in consultation with the relevant Chair);
Efficient decision-making should be paramount;
Conflicts of interest should be avoided and risks minimised;
To ensure processes are free from bias and pre-determination Community Boards
should not adjudicate on issues on which they have advocated or wish to advocate to
Council;
Community Boards should proactively and constructively engage with residents on
local matters that affect the community they represent and raise with Council issues
raised with them by their community and advocate on behalf of their community.
These delegations:
(a) do not delegate any function, duty or power which a statute (for example section
53(3) and clause 32(1) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002) prohibits
from being delegated;
(b) are subject to and do not affect any delegation which the Council has already made
or subsequently makes to any other committee, Council officer or other member of
staff;
(c) are subject to any other statutory requirements that may apply to a particular
delegation;
(d) are subject to any notice issued by the Council, from time to time, to a Community
Board that a particular issue must be referred to Council for decision;
(e) reflect that decisions with significant financial implications should be made by
Council (or a committee with delegated authority);
Page 3 of 48
(f) promote centralisation of those functions where the appropriate expertise must be
ensured; and
(g) reflect that all statutory and legal requirements must be met.
DELEGATIONS
Decide:
Naming new roads and alterations to street names (in the Community Board’s area).
Official naming of parks, reserves and sports grounds within the provisions of
Council’s Naming Policy. Note 1
Removal and/or planting of street trees within the provisions of Council’s
Operational Guide for Urban Forest Plan where a dispute arises that cannot be
resolved at officer level. Note 2
The granting of leases and licences in terms of Council policy to voluntary
organisations for Council owned properties in their local area, for example, halls,
but not including the granting of leases and licences to community houses and
centres.
The granting of rights-of-way and other easements over local purpose reserves and
granting of leases or licences on local purpose reserves.
The granting of leases and licences for new activities in terms of Council policy to
community and commercial organisations over recreation reserves subject to the
provisions of the Reserves Act 1977 and land managed as reserve subject to the
provisions of the Local Government 2002, in their local area. (Note: renewal of
existing leases and licences will be reported once a year to Council’s City
Development Committee).
The allocation of funding from the Community Engagement Fund in accordance
with Council’s adopted guidelines.
Expenditure of funds allocated by the Council to the Board from the Miscellaneous
Budget to cover expenditure associated with the activities of the Board. The Chair
to approve expenditure, in consultation with the Board, and forward appropriate
documentation to the Committee Advisor for authorisation. Boards must not
exceed their annual expenditure from the Miscellaneous Budget.
The allocation of funding for the training and development of Community Board or
members, including formal training courses, attendance at seminars or attendance at
relevant conferences.
1
This excludes sites that are considered high profile, significant on a city-wide basis due to their size and location, or where the
site crosses ward or community boundaries.
2
The Operational Guide for Urban Forest Plan is available from Council’s Parks and Gardens Division.
Page 4 of 48
Consider and make recommendations to Council on:
Particular issues notified from time to time by Council to the Community Board.
Roading issues considered by the Mayor and Chief Executive to be strategic due to
their significance on a city-wide basis, including links to the State Highway, or
where their effects cross ward or community boundaries.
Parks, reserves and sports ground naming for sites that have a high profile, city-
wide importance due to their size and location and/or cross ward or community
boundaries.
Representatives to any Council committee, subcommittee, subordinate decision-
making body, working group, or ad hoc group on which a Community Board
representative is required by Council.
The setting, amending or revoking of speed limits in accordance with the Hutt City
Council Bylaw 2005 Speed Limits, including the hearing of any submissions.
GENERAL FUNCTIONS
Provide their local community’s input on:
Council’s Long Term Plan and/or Annual Plan.
Council’s policies, programmes (including the District Roading Programme) and
bylaws.
Changes or variations to the District Plan.
Resource management issues which it believes are relevant to its local community,
through advocacy.
The disposal or acquisition of significant assets.
Road safety including road safety education within its area.
Any other issues a Board believes is relevant to its local area.
Review Local Community Plans as required.
Reports may be prepared by the Board and presented to Council Committees, along with an
officer’s recommendation, for consideration.
Any submissions lodged by a Board or Committee require formal endorsement by way of
resolution.
Co-ordinate with Council staff:
Local community consultation on city-wide issues on which the Council has called
for consultation.
Maintain:
An overview of roadworks, water supply, sewerage, stormwater drainage, waste
management and traffic management for its local area.
Page 5 of 48 An overview of parks, recreational facilities and community activities within its
local area.
Develop:
Community Response Plans in close consultation with the Wellington Region
Emergency Management Office, emergency organisations, the community,
residents’ associations, other community groups, and local businesses. The
Community Response Plans will be reviewed on an annual basis.
Grant:
Local community awards.
Promote:
Recreational facilities and opportunities in its area with a view to ensure maximum
usage.
Arts and crafts in its area.
Appoint:
A liaison member or, where appropriate, representatives to ad hoc bodies, which
are involved in community activities within the Board’s area, on which a
community representative is sought.
Endorse:
1. Amendments to the Eastbourne Community Trust Deed (Eastbourne Community
Board only).
Page 6 of 48HUTT CITY COUNCIL
PETONE COMMUNITY BOARD
Meeting to be held in the Petone Library, 7 Britannia Street, Petone on
Monday 18 February 2019 commencing at 6.30pm.
ORDER PAPER
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Generally up to 30 minutes is set aside for public comment (three minutes per
speaker). Speakers may be asked questions on the matters they raise.
3. PRESENTATIONS
a) Presentation by Moera Community House (19/114)
Verbal presentation by Ms Lorraine Dick, Community House
Coordinator
b) Presentation by Petone Baptist Church (19/164)
Verbal presentation by Ms Jocelyn Smith, Petone Baptist Church
c) Presentation by Local Councillor from Greater Wellington Regional
Council (GWRC) (19/20)
Verbal presentation by Local Councillor from Greater Wellington
Regional Council
d) Presentation by Jackson Street Programme (19/21)
Verbal presentation by Ms Leonie Dobbs, Chair
4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
5. MINUTES
Meeting minutes Petone Community Board, 5 November 2018 98 18 February 2019
6. REPORT REFERRED FOR BOARD INPUT BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED
BY SUBCOMMITTEE OF COUNCIL
Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions
(19/157)
Report No. PCB2019/1/9 by the Assistant Traffic Engineer 21
7. COMMITTEE ADVISOR'S REPORT (19/22)
Report No. PCB2019/1/1 by the Committee Advisor 26
8. NEW ZEALAND COMMUNITY BOARDS CONFERENCE 2019 (19/149)
Memorandum dated 29 January 2019 by the Committee Advisor 30
9. INFORMATION ITEMS
a) Review of Parking - No Stopping At All Times Restriction -
Richmond Grove (19/101)
Memorandum dated 30 January 2019 by the Senior Traffic Engineer 36
b) Review of Parking - Near 313 Jackson Street (19/116)
Memorandum dated 31 January 2019 by the Traffic Engineer -
Network Operations 39
c) Review of Parking - Gear Street Parking Restrictions (19/132)
Memorandum dated 4 February 2019 by the Traffic Engineer -
Network Operations 42
10. CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT (19/23)
Report No. PCB2019/1/15 by the Chair, Petone Community Board 45
11. QUESTIONS
With reference to section 32 of Standing Orders, before putting a question a
member shall endeavour to obtain the information. Questions shall be concise
and in writing and handed to the Chair prior to the commencement of the
meeting.
Donna Male
COMMITTEE ADVISOR9 5 November 2018
HUTT CITY COUNCIL
PETONE COMMUNITY BOARD
Minutes of a meeting held in the Petone Library Meeting Room, 7 Britannia Street,
Petone on
Monday 5 November 2018 commencing at 6.30pm
PRESENT: Ms P Hanna (Chair) Mr M Branch
Mr B Dyer Mr M Fisher (Deputy Chair)
Ms K Yung Cr T Lewis
Cr M Lulich
APOLOGIES: There was an apology received from Mr Foaese.
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr D Simmons, Traffic Asset Manager (part meeting)
Mr D Wood, Traffic Engineer (part meeting)
Ms D Male, Committee Advisor
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Ms Yung) Minute No. PCB 18501
“That the apology received from Mr Foaese be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.
3. PRESENTATIONS
a) Presentation by Local Councillor from Greater Wellington Regional Council
(GWRC) (18/1626)
Cr Prue Lamason from Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) advised the
following:
Wellington Water Ltd had advised that water restrictions were in place from
the beginning to the end of daylight savings time. This was the usual
restrictions of alternate days usage and no unsupervised irrigation systems.
The survey results in relation to regional parks showed there were more than
1.7M visits to the parks in the last year, which was an increase from 2017. The
most common reason for not visiting was not having the time to visit. There
was a reduction in the reason of the weather.10 5 November 2018
An additional bridge at Baring Head was being built due to flooding issues. It
was scheduled to be completed prior to the busy holiday period.
A new track would soon be opened in Eastbourne. Also a new barrier had
been installed at Burdens Gate for easier bike access.
In response to questions from members, Cr Lamason advised that she would
report to GWRC officers about dogs off leads in Belmont Regional Park in
Korokoro between Cornish Street and the dam. She added that any further bus
strikes had been called off.
b) Presentation by Jackson Street Programme (18/1628)
Ms Leonie Dobbs, Chair of the Jackson Street Programme (JSP) provide a detailed
update on the upcoming Christmas Parade and festivities planned for Jackson
Street. She highlighted the following:
Briefings were taking place for the different parties involved in the parade,
incorporating health and safety issues. This would include the 75-100
marshalls, as over 25k people had attended the event the previous year.
The grotto was being built together as a winter wonderland. The snowdome
would also be provided again this year.
Leaflets were circulated to members detailing the information, dates and times
of the parade, grotto openings and treasure hunts.
JSP gave apologies as it was not available to attend the P2040 meeting
scheduled for the day following the meeting.
In response to a question from a member, Ms Dobbs advised that JSP had spoken
to police about the legality of car window cleaners operating along Jackson Street.
She said that there were a number of legitimate window cleaners who cleaned
shop windows. She added that Council’s Safe City officers were also looking out
for any issues with window cleaners.
4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
Ms K Yung declared a conflict of interest with regard to Item 6, Community
Engagement Fund 2018-2019 in relation to Moera Community House and took no
part in discussion or voting on the matter. She also declared a conflict of interest
with regard to Item 7a) Randwick Road – Proposed No Stopping At All Times
Restrictions and took no part in voting on the matter.11 5 November 2018
5. MINUTES
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Mr Fisher) Minute No. PCB 18502
“That the minutes of the meeting of the Petone Community Board held on Monday, 3 September
2018, be confirmed as a true and correct record.”
6. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FUND 2018-2019 (18/1705)
Memorandum dated 24 October 2018 by the Community Advisor - Funding and
Community Contracts
Ms Yung declared an interest in the item in relation to Moera Commuity House and took
no part in discussion or voting on the matter.
Speaking under public comment, Ms J Smith representing Petone Baptist Church
summarised some of the costs for the event. These included $644 for advertising, $1,000
for equipment and consumables, an amount for carpet cleaning, animal hire and $200 for
testing and tagging of electical equipment. She asked if the Board could support the $200
as it was an important item which was a requirement for health and safety reasons and
must be completed annually. She circulated leaflets to members on the event, which
would run from 30 November to 2 December 2018.
In response to questions from members, Ms Smith advised that the previous year around
1,000 people had attended the event. She noted that Mitre 10 had supported the event in
the past allowing them to borrow plants for the events. She added that they had not
applied for any other funding as they felt the Community Engagement fund was the
most appropriate as it was Petone based.
The Chair elaborated on the memorandum.
Members discussed and agreed to add on the additional $200 for the Petone Baptist
Church Christmas in Bethlehem event for testing and tagging of electrical equipment.
Members noted this left a remaining amount of $1,503 for distribution in a second round
of funding in 2019.12 5 November 2018
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Mr Dyer) Minute No. PCB 18503
“That the Board:
(i) notes that the Community Engagement Fund closed on 18 October 2018 and three
applications had been received;
(ii) agrees that the applications were considered according to the merits of the application
criteria and priorities of the fund;
(iii) agrees to the recommended allocations for the Petone Community Engagement Fund
2018/2019, as attached as Appendix 1 to the report as follows:
(a) Moera Community House for $1,000.00 for the Community Christmas Party, towards
the cost of hiring equipment/activities and the purchase of consumables, advertising and
photographer;
(b) Petone CAB for $1,447.00 for a promotion gazebo, towards the cost of a 3x3m gazebo
plus sign writing; and
(c) Petone Baptist Church for $2,300.00 for the Christmas in Bethlehem event, towards the
cost of advertising, equipment hire and consumables, electrical tagging;
(iv) agrees that any funds unallocated will be used in a second round of funding in 2019. The
opening and closing dates of the fund is proposed as follows; and
Open Fund Close Fund Decisions Due
4 February 2019 4 March 2019 8 April 2019
(v) agrees that the organisations granted funding will be required to attend a meeting of the
Board once the project has been completed.”
7. REPORTS REFERRED FOR BOARD INPUT BEFORE BEING CONSIDERED
BY SUBCOMMITTEE OF COUNCIL
a) Randwick Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1707)
Report No. PCB2018/5/295 by the Assistant Traffic Engineer
Ms Yung declared an interest in the item and took no part in voting on the matter.
The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report.
In response to questions from members, the Traffic Asset Manager advised that
leaving one park outside No. 148 would still restrict access to the driveway if a
larger vehicle was parked. He considered it would not solve the issue that had
been raised. He added that there were no time restrictions on that side of the road,
if L and T bars were installed to mark car parks. He noted that a park could
potentially still be lost, once the parks had been measured out for the markings.
The Traffic Asset Manager further added that few issues were raised in the area, so
the area had not been reviewed as a whole. He considered this was a solution to an13 5 November 2018
issue raised for one property.
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Cr Lewis) Minute No. PCB 18504
“That the Petone Community Board endorses the recommendation contained within the
officer’s report.”
b) Bolton Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1708)
Report No. PCB2018/5/296 by the Traffic Engineer – Network Operations
Speaking under public comment, Mr A Buxton explained that he and his partner,
Ms Jones, had only ramps in place to access parking on their property driveway.
He noted they often had people parking over and blocking the driveway, even
when his car was parked on the property. He said that he worked evenings and a
tow truck had been called four or five times to remove vehicles blocking his car in.
He added that they had not requested broken yellow lines over the driveways, as
residents often parked over their own driveways. He said that he had heard from
Council’s Parking Wardens that they did not ticket residents’ cars parked over
their own driveways. He suggested that a residents’ parking scheme could be
considered.
Speaking under public comment, Ms D Jones advised that she had put in the
original request for restrictions. She added that she was also a shift worker, but
that her concern was for her partner’s health. She would need to drive her partner’s
car off the property to drive him to hospital when necessary, as her own car was
often parked too far away.
In response to a question from a member, Ms Jones advised that she had only
requested that parks be marked with L and T bars in the original request, not
broken yellow lines.
In response to a question from a member, Mr Buxton advised that in total it could
take up to an hour for Council’s Parking Warden to come out and for the tow truck
to arrive to remove vehicles.
Speaking under public comment, Ms B Anderson said that she had lived in the
street for 13 years and her property had a driveway with a ‘determined’ access. She
added that Weltec students would often park over the edge of her driveway,
making it difficult to drive her car off the driveway. She wanted additional space to
enable her to easily access her driveway. She added that she supported option c. in
the officer’s report for L and T bar markings. She considered that broken yellow
lines may also help to stop people parking over the edge of her driveway.
In response to a question from a member, Ms Anderson advised that she did not
notice any particular time of the day being worse or busier than other times.14 5 November 2018
The Traffic Engineer elaborated on the report. He advised that further consultation
feedback had been received following the publication of the Board’s agenda. He
highlighted that 12 responses were returned, four (33%) in favour, seven (58%)
against the proposal and one neutral (8%). He added that five responses had been
received after the consultation had closed.
The Traffic Asset Manager added that the original request did not request no
stopping at all times, broken yellow lines. He acknowledged that Council’s Parking
Wardens did exercise discretion on a licence plate check, or if the car was known to
be a residents. He said that L and T bars alone may not solve the parking issues in
the street. He added that residents’ parking schemes may be considered in the
future, but would not be to reserve parks for residents. It could enable residents to
park longer in time restricted parks.
In response to questions from members, the Traffic Asset Manager advised that it
was possible to install broken yellow lines only over the driveways of the residents
who requested them. He said that broken yellow lines reminded people of the legal
restrictions to not park over driveways. He added that it was preferred to have
consistency in an area.
Members did not support the recommendation contained within the officer’s
report, but supported option c. Members also supported No Stopping At All Times
yellow lines on the corners of Bolton Street and Adelaide Street. This was shown
on a plan tabled at the meeting and attached at page 11 to the minutes.
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Cr Lulich) Minute No. PCB 18505
“That the Petone Community Board:
(i) does not endorse the recommendation contained within the officer’s report;
(ii) supports the installation of the proposed Parking Bays (L and T bar markings) as
shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and
(iii) supports the installation of No Stopping At All Times and markings on the corners of
Bolton Street and Adelaide Street as shown attached as page 11 to the minutes.”
8. PROPOSED NEW PRIVATE STREET NAME: SUBDIVISION OF 39
KOROKORO ROAD (18/818)
Report No. PCB2018/4/213 by the Traffic Engineer - Network Operations
The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report. A replacement page to the
report was tabled at the meeting, as attached as page 12 to the minutes.
Members discussed working on suggesting additional names to add the list and
also sharing the history of the new street names. This would be done both through
Facebook and temporary signs for the first few months when the street name was15 5 November 2018
installed.
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Mr Dyer) Minute No. PCB 18506
“That the Board approves the name for the new private road 39 Korokoro Road, Korokoro as
shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report, as Highfield Place.”
For the reason an approved street name and road type are required to allow the
subdivision to proceed to completion.
9. 2019 MEETING SCHEDULE (18/1667)
Memorandum dated 17 October 2018 by the Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
The Chair elaborated on the memorandum. She suggested a recommendation to Council
in relation to the meeting schedule being for the statutory parts of Council and for elected
members. She further suggested that Council’s Community Services Committee meetings
should be held at venues capable of live streaming the meetings.
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Cr Lewis) Minute No. PCB 18507
“That the Board:
(i) agrees to the meeting dates for 2019 in respect of its own meetings attached as Appendix 2 to
the memorandum;
(ii) determines the start time for its meetings will be 6.30pm;
(iii) determines the venue for its meetings will be Petone Library;
(iv) notes that the Chair will set dates for informal meetings of the Board as the need arises; and
(v) delegates authority to the Chief Executive in consultation with the Board Chair to alter the
date, time or venue of a meeting, or cancel a meeting, should circumstances require this.”
RECOMMENDATION: (Ms Hanna/Ms Yung) Minute No. PCB 18508
“That the Board recommends that Council:
(i) considers that Council created panels should not be part of the discussion paper/report that is
about the statutory parts of Council and the meeting schedule for elected members; and
(ii) requests that all Community Services Committee meetings are live streamed.”
10. COMMITTEE ADVISOR'S REPORT (18/1629)
Report No. PCB2018/5/20 by the Committee Advisor
The Committee Advisor elaborated on the report.
Members discussed advertising Board meetings via Facebook and wished to review the
engagement reach of Facebook advertising. Mr Dyer agreed to provide the information to16 5 November 2018
members.
The Chair drew members attention to the consultation for the Proposed District Plan
Change 52: Alignment of the District Plan with the New Zealand Heritage List. She asked
members to check that Petone heritage sites were on both lists, or to consider a
submission on the District Plan change.
The motion was taken in parts and carried on the voices.
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Mr Fisher) Minute No. PCB 18509
“That the Board receives and notes the report.”
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Mr Branch) Minute No. PCB 18510
“That the Board:
(i) determines the catering requirements for its 2019 meetings will be tea and coffee; and
(ii) determines advertising requirements for its 2019 meetings will be the Hutt News, Council
website and Petone Community Board Facebook page and will review setting a budget for
meetings promoted through Facebook, based on potential engagement rate reach.”
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Ms Yung) Minute No. PCB 18511
“That the Board agrees to purchase two stalls at the Petone Rotary Fair to be held on Saturday 16
February 2019 at a cost of approximately $240.”
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Cr Lulich) Minute No. PCB 18512
“That the Board approves retrospectively the payment of $150 from the Board’s training budget
for Ms Karen Yung’s attendance at the LGNZ Climate Change Symposium on 7 September
2018.”
11. REVIEW OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT (18/1692)
Memorandum dated 23 October 2018 by the Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
The Chair elaborated on the memorandum. She added that she had reviewed the Local
Government New Zealand (LGNZ) guidance for Codes of Conduct and the LGNZ model
Code of Conduct.
In response to a question from a member, the Committee Advisor advised that if the
Board did not agree to be bound by the updated version of the Code of Conduct (the
Code), the Board would continue to be bound by the previous version adopted by the
Board at the beginning of the triennium.
Members fully discussed whether to continue to be bound by the current version or the
new version of the Code. The views of members in favour of adopting the updated
version of the Code included: consistency with Council; happy for the Mayor to review17 5 November 2018
complaints raised under the Code; and reducing costs paid on independent advice when
not required.
The views of members against adopting the updated version of the Code included:
increased independence of reviewing complaints raised under the Code; wanting the best
process for communities; and a preference for the originally adopted Code.
RESOLVED: (Mr Fisher/Mr Dyer) Minute No. PCB 18513
“That the Board:
(i) notes the amendments to the Code of Conduct for Elected Members, attached as Appendix 1
to this report; and
(ii) agrees to be bound by the Code of Conduct for Elected Members, with all necessary
modifications to make it applicable to community board members.”
12. CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT (18/1630)
Report No. PCB2018/5/137 by the Chair, Petone Community Board
The Chair elaborated on the report. She drew the members attention to the Community
Christmas barbeque on 24 November 2018, to follow the emergency hub exercise. She
advised that sea level rises would be considered by Council’s Policy and Regulatory
Committee within the Carbon Targets report.
The Chair highlighted that a Child and Young Persons Wellbeing Strategy was being
worked on by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC). The DPMC
wanted to hear from children, young people and families, community sector groups and
local government. Engagement options were as follows:
https://dpmc.govt.nz/our-programmes/child-and-youth-wellbeing-strategy
cws.subscribe@dpmc.govt.nz
RESOLVED: (Ms Hanna/Ms Yung) Minute No. PCB 18514
“That the Board notes and receives the report.”
13. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
The members finished the meeting with a whakatauki.
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 8.28pm.18 5 November 2018
Ms P Hanna
CHAIR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 18th day of February 201919 5 November 2018 Bolton Street – Proposed No Stopping At All Time Restrictions
20 5 November 2018 Proposed New Private Street Name: Subdivision of 39 Korokoro Road
21 18 February 2019
Petone Community Board
14 January 2019
File: (19/157)
Report no: PCB2019/1/9
Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At
All Times Restrictions
Purpose of Report
1. The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s approval for the installation of
No Stopping At All Times Restrictions at the intersection of Gracefield Road
and Seaview Road, and the relocation of the northern No Parking sign, as
shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report.
Recommendations
That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council:
(i) approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions at the
intersection of Gracefield Road and Seaview Road, as shown attached as
Appendix 1 to the report; and
(ii) approves the relocation of the existing No Parking sign, as shown attached
as Appendix 1 to the report.
For the reasons, the proposed restrictions:
- would improve safety within the street for the benefit of all road users;
- would promote compliance with the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004;
and
- are supported by all the local residents who responded to the consultation
documents.
Background
2. Council received a request from a local business to improve road safety at
the intersection of Gracefield Road and Seaview Road by installing No
Stopping At All Times Restrictions.
3. The concern expressed is that cars parked too close to the intersection restrict
sight distance and reduce the space available for vehicle manoeuvring.
DEM12-20-2 - 19/157 - Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Page 21
Restrictions22 18 February 2019
4. Gracefield Road is a busy Primary Collector Road which provides access to
the Wainuiomata Hill Road and the Gracefield commercial/industrial area.
5. There are a relatively high number of vehicle manoeuvres from off road
parking areas and industrial/commercial activity, which adds to the
complexity of the driving task for motorists.
6. A water pumping station and service area is located immediately southeast
of the intersection at 73 Seaview Road. Parking in front of the pumping
station is prohibited to allow 24 hour service access.
7. Parking demand is relatively high in the area due to employee parking at the
nearby industrial activity.
Discussion
8. The proposal involves the installation of No Stopping At All Times
Restrictions (broken yellow lines) on the south eastern corner of the
intersection, and also opposite the intersection on Seaview Road.
9. The proposed restriction from Gracefield Road into Seaview Road would
prevent vehicles parking in the vicinity of the throat island and corner, and
ensure that sight distance and manoeuvring space is maintained for vehicles
exiting Gracefield Road.
10. The proposed restriction would extend past the water pumping station to
prevent vehicles parking between the pump station and the corner, and
reinforce the existing No Parking restriction at the pump station service area.
11. An existing No Parking sign outside the pumping station would be relocated
further north to prevent vehicles from parking behind the proposed broken
yellow lines.
12. Vehicles parked on the carriageway and berm opposite the intersection on
Seaview Road restrict the manoeuvring space available on Seaview Road
and increase the risk of vehicle conflict.
13. Vehicles parked in this area also damage the road seal edge, increasing
maintenance costs.
14. The proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in this area would tie
into the existing restriction to the north and ensure the intersection is free of
obstruction by parked vehicles.
15. The installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, as proposed,
would improve road safety and ensure the full carriageway width is
available for motorists, reducing the risk for vehicle conflict.
16. The proposed restrictions would promote compliance with the Land
Transport (Road User) Rule 2004, which states that “A driver or person in
charge of a vehicle must not stop, stand or park the vehicle on any part of a
roadway so close to any corner, bend, rise, dip, traffic island, or intersection
as to obstruct other traffic or any view of the roadway to the driver of a
vehicle approaching that corner, bend, rise, dip, traffic island or intersection
DEM12-20-2 - 19/157 - Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Page 22
Restrictions23 18 February 2019
unless the stopping, standing or parking is authorised by signs or markings
maintained by the road controlling authority.”
17. The two businesses immediately adjacent to the intersection were consulted
and approve of the proposed measures.
Options
18. The options are:
a. to leave the area as it is and accept the current level of service for road
safety; or
b. improve the road safety level of service by installing No Stopping At All
Times Restrictions as shown in Appendix 1 to prevent parked vehicles
obstructing sight distance and manoeuvring space; or
c. to install No Stopping At All Times Restrictions over some greater or
lesser extent to improve road safety.
19. Officers recommend Option b as it provides a good balance between road
safety amenity and the retention of existing parking.
Consultation
20. Consultation documents were delivered to two directly affected businesses
at Nºs 74 Seaview Road and 240 Gracefield Road.
21. Both questionnaires were returned in favour of the proposal.
22. The Petone Community Board will consider the recommendation at its
meeting on 18 February 2019 and the resolution will be tabled at the Traffic
Subcommittee meeting on 25 February 2019.
Legal Considerations
23. These restrictions are made pursuant to the provisions of the Hutt City
Council Traffic Bylaw 2017.
Financial Considerations
24. These changes can be funded from Council’s 2018/2019 road markings
budget.
Other Considerations
25. In making this recommendation, officers have given careful consideration to
the purpose of local government in section 10 of the Local Government Act
2002. Officers believe that this recommendation falls within the purpose of
local government in that it improves sight distance and safety for the benefit
of all road users. It does this in a way that is cost-effective because it utilises
standard road markings.
Appendices
No. Title Page
1 Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions 25
DEM12-20-2 - 19/157 - Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Page 23
Restrictions24 18 February 2019 Author: Victor Fraga Assistant Traffic Engineer Reviewed By: Zackary Moodie Traffic Engineer - Network Operations Approved By: Damon Simmons Traffic Asset Manager DEM12-20-2 - 19/157 - Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Page 24 Restrictions
Attachment 1 Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions DEM12-20-2 - 19/157 - Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions Page 25
26 18 February 2019
Petone Community Board
07 January 2019
File: (19/22)
Report no: PCB2019/1/1
Committee Advisor's Report
Purpose of Report
1. The primary purpose of the report is to update the Board on items of
interest.
Recommendations
That the Board:
(i) receives and notes the report; and
(ii) determines advertising requirements, via Facebook, for its 2019 meetings.
Follow up from last Board meeting
Traffic Reports
2. At its meeting on 5 November 2018, the Board considered the following
traffic reports:
Randwick Road – Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, the
Board endorsed the recommendation contained in the report; and
Bolton Street – Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, the
Board did not endorse the recommendation contained in the report. The
Board supported the installation of the proposed parking bays (L and T
bar markings) and the installation of No Stopping At All Times and
markings on the corners of Bolton Street and Adelaide Street.
3. At its meeting on 11 December 2018, Council resolved to approve the
recommendation contained in the report for Randwick Road. For Bolton
Street, Council resolved to approve the recommendations from the Board.
DEM12-20-2 - 19/22 - Committee Advisor's Report Page 2627 18 February 2019
2019 Meeting Schedule
4. At its meeting on 5 November 2018, the Board considered the 2019 Meeting
Schedule and made recommendations to Council, as the minutes extract
below.
RECOMMENDATION: (Ms Hanna/Ms Yung) Minute No. PCB 18508
“That the Board recommends that Council:
(i) considers that Council created panels should not be part of the discussion
paper/report that is about the statutory parts of Council and the meeting
schedule for elected members; and
(ii) requests that all Community Services Committee meetings are live streamed.”
5. At its meeting on 11 December 2018, Council resolved to note the
recommendations from the Petone Community Board and also adopted the
schedule of meetings.
Advertising Meetings
6. At its meeting on 5 November 2018, the Board determined the advertising
requirements for its 2019 meetings would be the Hutt News, Council website
and Petone Community Board Facebook page. The Board also wanted to
review setting a budget for meetings promoted through Facebook, based on
potential engagement reach.
7. Facebook reach was circulated to Board members in November 2018, as
below.
Event Type Advertising Reach Impressions RSVPs to
cost Event
Coffee chat $15.04 301 733 5
WREMO public $13.00 563 1,176 11
meeting
Coffee chat $29.78 933 2,489 9
Public meeting $15.00 710 1,422 12
Public meeting $7.06 261 664 2
8. The Board needs to determine a budget for promoting meetings via its
Facebook page.
Council’s current consultation
9. Please see below a list of current proposals Council is consulting on. These
can be viewed on the Council website
http://www.huttcity.govt.nz/Your-Council/Have-your-say/Consulting-
on/
DEM12-20-2 - 19/22 - Committee Advisor's Report Page 2728 18 February 2019
Ecology and Landscapes Consultation
Heritage Policy Review
Naenae Park Upgrade 15 February 2019
Barton Grove Reserve Improvements 22 February 2019
2018/2019 Miscellaneous Administration and Training Budgets
10. The following is the Board’s expenditure as at 25 January 2019
Miscellaneous Training
Administration
Budget $5,0000.00 $3,000.00
Expenditure at 25.01.2019 $1,322.68 $827.43
BALANCE $3,677.32 $2,172.57
11. A spreadsheet detailing expenditure is attached as Appendix 1 to the report.
Appendices
No. Title Page
1 Petone Community Board Actual Expenditure 2018 2019 29
Author: Donna Male
Committee Advisor
Approved By: Kathryn Stannard
Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
DEM12-20-2 - 19/22 - Committee Advisor's Report Page 28Attachment 1 Petone Community Board Actual Expenditure 2018 2019 DEM12-20-2 - 19/22 - Committee Advisor's Report Page 29
MEMORANDUM 30 18 February 2019
Our Reference 19/149
TO: Chair and Members
Petone Community Board
FROM: Judy Randall
DATE: 29 January 2019
SUBJECT: NEW ZEALAND COMMUNITY BOARDS CONFERENCE
2019
Recommendations
That the Board:
(i) notes the New Zealand Community Boards Conference to be held in New
Plymouth from 11-13 April 2019 attached as Appendix 1 to the report;
(ii) notes the estimated cost of attending the conference per Board member is
approximately $1,500.00;
(iii) notes that the Training Policy for Community Boards and Community
Committees (the Policy) adopted by Council at its meeting held on 14 March
2017 limited the number of Community Board/Community Committee
members to attend the biennial Community Boards conference to one per
Board/Committee;
(iv) notes that at a recent Councillors Planning session, Councillors asked officers
to review the relevant section of the Policy (see part (ii) above) and report
back to the next relevant Committee for consideration and recommending to
Council;
(v) agrees that one board member attends the 2019 New Zealand Community
Board Conference; and
(vi) agrees, in principal, that an additional board member attends the 2019 New
Zealand Community Board Conference subject to Council adopting the
revised Policy allowing more than one board member to attend if within the
overall Boards training budgets and any expenditure beyond budget be
personally funded.
Background – Community Board Conference
1. The biennial conference was introduced in 1997 to bring New Zealand
community boards together to share practice, and to help improve the
understanding and work of community boards.
2. The 2019 New Zealand Community Board Conference is scheduled to be
held 11-13 April 2019 in New Plymouth. The theme of the 2019 Community
Board conference is Community Boards in a Time of Change. The
conference programme is attached as Appendix 1 to the report. The official
conference website is http://www.nzcbc2019.co.nz/nzcbc19
DEM12-20-2 - 19/149 - New Zealand Community Boards Conference 2019 Page 30MEMORANDUM 31 18 February 2019
3. Officers estimate that costs to attend the conference in New Plymouth will be
approximately $1,500.00. This figure includes registration, flights,
accommodation and incidentals.
Background – Training Policy for Community Boards and Community
Committees (the Policy)
4. At its meeting dated 14 March 2017 Council resolved the following:
RESOLVED: (Cr Cousins/Cr Briggs) Minute No. C 17101(3)
“That Council approves the revised Training Policy for Community Boards and
Community Committees (should Community Committees be established), attached
as Appendix 1 to Report No PRC2017/1/51.”
5. The Policy, adopted by Council on 14 March 2017, states:
Community Boards’ Conference
‘The number of Community Board/Community Committee members being funded
through the training budget to attend the biennial Community Boards’ conference is
limited to one per Board/Committee.’
‘…. The maximum amount Council will pay towards the training needs and work
programme of any one Hutt City Council Community Board/Community
Committee member is $1,500 per financial year.’
6. Council resolved at its meeting held on 23 May 2017 to establish four
Community Panels with different delegations, guidelines and criteria than
that of the Community Boards. Council did not establish Community
Committees for the 2016-2019 triennium.
Request from the Chair of the Petone Community Board
7. On 11 January 2019 the Chief Executive received a letter from the Chair of
the Petone Community Board asking him to consider allowing two Board
members to attend the 2019 conference for the following reasons:
a) Better cover involvement in the workshops/sessions available
concurrently.
b) Raise the networking and thinking and learnings by 1 X 1 = 3 because of
the sharing, support and discussion opportunities two people provide
each other compared to one person attending by themselves.
c) Much better enable follow-up action as well as feedback after such a
conference.
8. The Chair of the Petone Community Board highlighted particular sessions
that were of interest to the Board:
Encouraging Youth and Talent.
Engaging with the Maori community.
Active aging.
The address from the Minister for Local Government.
Thinking about Education to Employment.
DEM12-20-2 - 19/149 - New Zealand Community Boards Conference 2019 Page 31MEMORANDUM 32 18 February 2019
LGNZ Update from the Chair.
LGNZ Localism project update from CEO.
Entering in one or both of the Engaging Communities and Leadership
Best Practice Award.
9. As the Chief Executive was unable to approve the request as it conflicted
with a Council decision, the request was raised at the recent Councillors
Planning Session.
10. Councillors asked officers to review the relevant section of the Policy that
limited the number of Community Board/Community Committee members
being funded through the training budget to attend the biennial Community
Boards’ conference to one per Board/Committee and report back to the
Policy and Regulatory Committee for its consideration at its meeting to be
held on 4 March 2019 with a recommendation to Council.
11. The outcome of Council’s decision will be known on 26 March 2019 and will
be circulated to the Chairs of the Boards.
Appendices
No. Title Page
1 Community Board Conference Programme 11-13 April 2019 33
Author: Judy Randall
Committee Advisor
Approved By: Kathryn Stannard
Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
DEM12-20-2 - 19/149 - New Zealand Community Boards Conference 2019 Page 32Attachment 1 Community Board Conference Programme 11-13 April 2019 Community Board Conference 11-13 April 2019 Programme DEM12-20-2 - 19/149 - New Zealand Community Boards Conference 2019 Page 33
Attachment 1 Community Board Conference Programme 11-13 April 2019 DEM12-20-2 - 19/149 - New Zealand Community Boards Conference 2019 Page 34
Attachment 1 Community Board Conference Programme 11-13 April 2019 DEM12-20-2 - 19/149 - New Zealand Community Boards Conference 2019 Page 35
MEMORANDUM 36 18 February 2019
Our Reference 19/101
TO: Chair and Members
Petone Community Board
FROM: Alan Hopkinson
DATE: 30 January 2019
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PARKING - NO STOPPING AT ALL TIMES
RESTRICTION - RICHMOND GROVE
Recommendation
That the Board:
(i) receives the information; and
(ii) notes that Officers will submit a report in Meeting Cycle 2 recommending
the extension of the new No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in Richmond
Grove, as requested by the requester.
Purpose of Memorandum
1. The purpose of this memorandum is to report on a review of new parking
restrictions in Richmond Grove as requested by the Traffic Subcommittee at
its meeting on 13 November 2017.
Background
2. At its meeting on 13 November 2017 the Traffic Subcommittee asked officers
to review the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in
Richmond Grove approximately 12 months after installation.
3. Council Officers contacted the original requester in January 2019.
4. The requester advised that the new Broken Yellow Lines did not go far
enough to the north, and that there was still an issue with a neighbour’s
truck parking at the northern end of the existing markings but still too close
to their driveway.
5. The Land Transport (Road User Rule) 2004 states that :
“6.3 Parking close to corners, bends, etc
(1) A driver or person in charge of a vehicle must not stop, stand, or park the
vehicle on any part of a roadway so close to any corner, bend, rise, dip, traffic island,
or intersection as to obstruct or be likely to obstruct other traffic or any view of the
roadway to the driver of a vehicle approaching that corner, bend, rise, dip, traffic
island, or intersection unless the stopping, standing, or parking is authorised by
signs or markings maintained by the road controlling authority.”
DEM12-20-2 - 19/101 - Review of Parking - No Stopping At All Times Restriction - Page 36
Richmond GroveMEMORANDUM 37 18 February 2019
6. The requester also indicated that their neighbours were also having access
difficulties – principally when leaving their driveway. Again, the problem
relates to the parking outside the requester’s property.
7. The proposed solution is to extend the existing No Stopping At All Times
restriction a further 11 metres to the north. This should ensure that the
requester has sufficient visibility to leave their property in safety. The extra
clear space should also assist with their neighbours’ access issues.
8. As a result of this review, Officers intend submitting a report to the Petone
Community Board and Traffic Subcommittee in Cycle 2 of 2019
recommending the extension of the No Stopping At All Times restriction as
requested by the requester.
9. The Traffic Subcommittee will receive this information at its meeting on 25
February 2019.
10. It is recommended that the Petone Community Board receive the
memorandum and notes the preparation of the report in Cycle 2
recommending the extension of the new No Stopping At All Times
Restrictions.
Appendices
No. Title Page
1 Richmond Grove - Proposed No Stopping At All Times 38
Restrictions
Author: Alan Hopkinson
Senior Traffic Engineer
Reviewed By: Damon Simmons
Traffic Asset Manager
Approved By: John Gloag
Divisional Manager, Transport
DEM12-20-2 - 19/101 - Review of Parking - No Stopping At All Times Restriction - Page 37
Richmond GroveAttachment 1 Richmond Grove - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions DEM12-20-2 - 19/101 - Review of Parking - No Stopping At All Times Restriction - Richmond Grove Page 38
MEMORANDUM 39 18 February 2019
Our Reference 19/116
TO: Chair and Members
Petone Community Board
FROM: Zackary Moodie
DATE: 31 January 2019
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PARKING - NEAR 313 JACKSON STREET
Recommendation
That the Petone Community Board:
(i) receives the information; and
(ii) notes that no further action be taken at this time, although Officers will likely
review the parking in the area, near 313 Jackson Street, further once the
effects of any changes to the bus stop are finalised and incorporated by
Greater Wellington Regional Council.
Purpose of Memorandum
1. The purpose of this Memorandum is to report back on the review of parking
in the area of 313 Jackson Street, 12 months after the completion of the
building and opening of three new businesses.
Background
2. The occupant of a new liquor store at 313 Jackson Street requested Council
Officers to change the existing P60 parking restriction on three roadside
parking spaces outside 313 Jackson Street to three P15 parking restrictions to
accommodate his customers. The business had not opened at the time of the
request.
3. Public consultation indicated little support for the P15 proposal and Officers
recommended that the restriction instead be altered to P30 to accommodate
the needs of the surrounding businesses.
4. As the business had not yet opened, and so any parking problem was
perceived, the Traffic Subcommittee recommended to Council to make no
change, and review the situation in 12 months’ time.
5. At its meeting on 13 December 2017, Council approved the Traffic
Subcommittee’s recommendations and asked Officers to review parking in
the area in 12 months’ time.
Review
6. Officers conducted three separate surveys of the parking availability for the
39 spaces in the surrounding area in January 2019. The survey showed
occupancy of 59%, 66% and 70%.
DEM12-20-2 - 19/116 - Review of Parking - Near 313 Jackson Street Page 39MEMORANDUM 40 18 February 2019
7. Intervention is generally not warranted under Council’s Parking Policy, and
international good practice, when the parking occupancy is less than 85%.
Discussion
8. The original requester is still requesting the installation of P15 parking
restrictions outside the liquor store.
9. As the surveyed parking occupancy is generally light, it is considered that
parking turnover in the area is acceptable and further parking restrictions
are not currently warranted.
10. Greater Wellington Regional Council is undertaking a review of bus stops
within the region to minimise hazards, and this stop has been identified for a
review. Any reconfiguration of the bus stop could affect nearby parking.
11. Officers will likely review the parking in the area further once the effects of
any changes to the bus stop are finalised and incorporated.
12. The Traffic Subcommittee will receive this information at its meeting on 25
February 2019.
13. It is recommended that the Petone Community Board receive the
memorandum and notes that no further action be taken until the results of
the GWRC review of bus stops within the region are known.
Appendices
No. Title Page
1 G119.2017 Jackson Street 41
Author: Zackary Moodie
Traffic Engineer - Network Operations
Reviewed By: Victor Fraga
Assistant Traffic Engineer
Approved By: Damon Simmons
Traffic Asset Manager
DEM12-20-2 - 19/116 - Review of Parking - Near 313 Jackson Street Page 40Attachment 1 G119.2017 Jackson Street DEM12-20-2 - 19/116 - Review of Parking - Near 313 Jackson Street Page 41
MEMORANDUM 42 18 February 2019
Our Reference 19/132
TO: Chair and Members
Petone Community Board
FROM: Zackary Moodie
DATE: 04 February 2019
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PARKING - GEAR STREET PARKING
RESTRICTIONS
Recommendation
That the Petone Community Board:
(i) receives the information; and
(ii) notes that Officers will subsequently submit a report recommending further
parking time restrictions on Gear Street.
Purpose of Memorandum
1. The purpose of this memorandum is to report back on the review of new
parking restrictions in Gear Street.
Background
2. At its meeting on 13 December 2017 Council approved the Traffic
Subcommittee’s recommendations for changes to the parking restrictions in
Gear Street and asked Officers to review the parking situation in 12 months’
time.
3. Officers had recommended (with additional changes) that five new angle
parking spaces be created outside 10 -14 Gear Street and that two of the
spaces have P15 restrictions and three spaces have P30 parking restrictions.
4. The Traffic Subcommittee recommended that the three proposed P30 spaces
instead have no time restriction, in response to feedback from other
businesses in the street.
5. The changes were made due to high parking demand in the street due to
existing businesses and increased demand due to a new Asian supermarket
that had recently opened.
Review
6. Officers conducted three separate surveys of the parking availability within
the surrounding area in January 2019. The results showed occupancy of 75%,
91% and 86% (average 84%) out of 24 carparks, as well as additional illegally
parked vehicles.
DEM12-20-2 - 19/132 - Review of Parking - Gear Street Parking Restrictions Page 42MEMORANDUM 43 18 February 2019
7. The parks outside 10 -14 Gear Street were regularly fully occupied and
vehicles were observed parked illegally surrounding the supermarket. Some
vehicles were located over driveways and No Stopping At All Times
restrictions (broken yellow lines).
Discussion
8. The incidences of illegal parking in the area suggest that parking demand at
times exceeds the supply of spaces.
9. The occupant of 10 -14 Gear Street suggested that the mechanic workshop
directly opposite the supermarket has been using the three unrestricted car
parks to store vehicles that they are working on.
10. These spaces are often taken up throughout the day and overnight, and the
mechanic employees regularly swap the vehicles out for other cars they are
working on. They also use the time-restricted parks for longer than the time-
imposed limit.
11. The Wellington Motorcycles representative indicated that they felt the
parking changes were working well.
12. Officers consider that the three unrestricted spaces outside 10 -14 Gear Street
should be changed to P30 restrictions as originally proposed.
13. The Traffic Subcommittee will receive this information at its meeting on 25
February 2019.
14. It is recommended that the Petone Community Board receive the
memorandum and notes the preparation of a subsequent report
recommending further parking time restrictions on Gear Street.
Appendices
No. Title Page
1 G206.2016 Gear Street Parking Review 2019 44
Author: Zackary Moodie
Traffic Engineer - Network Operations
Reviewed By: Victor Fraga
Assistant Traffic Engineer
Approved By: Damon Simmons
Traffic Asset Manager
DEM12-20-2 - 19/132 - Review of Parking - Gear Street Parking Restrictions Page 43You can also read
