SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group

Page created by Crystal Blake
 
CONTINUE READING
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
SBM CDT 2019
   Computational Module

                        Day 2

           Dr Fernanda Duarte
Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford

             http://fduartegroup.org            1
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Workplan

                 Tuesday      Wednesday        Friday
  9:00-10:00
                               Lecture 2      Lecture 3*

  10:30-12:00    Lecture 1    Project Work   Project Work

14:00- 17:00    Lab session   Project Work   Presentations

                Lab session   Project Work   Presentations

                                                             2
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Outline (Lecture 2)

• Day 1

• The good side: Applications of DFT in Chemistry

• The other side …. Challenges in DFT modelling

• A bit more on Functionals and Basis sets

                                                    3

                            3
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Computational Chemistry
                                                             Why should you care?
                                                                                               Hˆ = Hˆ N + Hˆ e
               Ĥ Y = E Y          Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

                                                                                                  Y = y ey N
                                               Theory
                                        Electronic Schrödinger Equation
                                                                                                                  Modelling
                                                Hˆ ey e = Eey e

                         -! 2   electrons           electrons nuclei
                                                                          ZA     electrons
                                                                                              1
                  Hˆ e =
                         2m
                                  å i
                                            Ñi2 -     å å
                                                        i       A      ri - R A
                                                                                + å
                                                                                    i< j   ri - r j
                          Kinetic energy                Coulomb attraction          Electronic repulsion
                                                         (nuclei-electrons)

                                                                                             Experiments

                                                                                               Synthesis

                                                                                                  Kinetics

                                                                                        spectroscopy

“Artificial Intelligence will not replace chemists. But chemists who doesn’t use (AI)
will be replace by those who do” Willem Van Hoorn                                                                             4
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Computational Chemistry
     What is - and why is it relevant?

       Which System Do I Have?

What Do You Want to Compute (and Why)?

 Which Model /Method Should I Choose?

    Verify Approach (vs. Experiment)

           Interpret/Analyse             5
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Computational Chemistry

       Which System Do I Have?

10 atoms – organic molecule – singlet

                                        6
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Computational Chemistry

    What Do I Want to Compute (and Why)?

Asymmetric Induction via 1,2-Addition to Carbonyl Compounds

      Conformations for the starting material and TS
               Which product is preferred?
   What is the molecular origin of such preference?

                                                              7
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Computational Chemistry
                               Which Model /Method Should I Choose?

                             Chemical Accuracy

              {φi}            double hybrid:
                           ωB97X-2, XYG3, B2PLYP
                                                                                     HF/3-21G
              εx       hybrid-GGA:     hyper-meta-GGA:
                                                                           NOT recommended
Simplicity

                      B3LYP, mPW1K    M06-2X, M11,TPSSh

                                                          Accuracy
                                                                           Many known deficiencies
              τ or              meta-GGA:                                  …
             ∇2ρ(r)          τHCTH,TPSS, M06-L                             But fast…
             ∇ρ(r)                 GGA:                                         Wong and Paddon-Row
                            PBE, BLYP, OLYP, B97                Theoretical evidence in support of the Anh – Eisenstein
                                                               electronic model in controlling π-facial stereoselectivity in
                                                                     nucleophilic additions to carbonyl compounds
              ρ(r)          LDA: VWN, GPW92
                                                                      J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1990, 456

                          Hartree Fock theory
                                                                                                                               8
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Computational Chemistry

            Which System Do I Have?

    What Do You Want to Compute (and Why)?

                                                    Often the most
      Which Model /Method Should I Choose?          interesting result is
                                                    when the “calculation
                                                    gets it wrong”

Verify Approach (vs. Experiment/Previous studies)

                Interpret/Analyse
                                                                       9
SBM CDT 2019 Computational Module - Day 2 Dr Fernanda Duarte - duarte Research Group
Computational Chemistry
Conformational Analysis: 2 minima

                                     ΔG = -RTlnK
                                K = exp[-(ΔΔG)/RT]/RT

                     K = e-3.6 kcal/mol /(0.001987)(298) = [A]/[B]
                   Thus % min1 = (0.0023/1.0023) x 100% = 99.8%

                  T(K) = 298             R(kcal mol-1) = 0.001987
                                         R(kJ K-1 mol-1) = 8.3144598 ×10−3
               h(J*s) = 6.6262 x 10-34       kb(J/K) = 1.3807 x 10-23
                                                                             10
Computational Chemistry
Conformational Analysis: 2 minima

                                 k BT - DG
                              k=     e           / RT

                                   h
               T(K) = 298             R(kcal mol-1) = 0.001987
                                      R(kJ K-1 mol-1) = 8.3144598 ×10−3

            h(J*s) = 6.6262 x 10-34       kb(J/K) = 1.3807 x 10-23        11
Computational Chemistry
               Asymmetric Induction via 1,2-Addition to Carbonyl Compounds

                                       Cornforth model J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959

                                  polar Felkin−Anh (PFA) model Tetrahedron Lett. 1968

Computational Organic Chemistry
     Steven M. Bachrach

                                      Paddon-Row, Rondan & Houk J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7162.
                    Houk, Paddon-Row, Rondan, Wu, Brown, Spellmeyer, Metz, Li & Longarich Science 1986, 231, 1108
                                         Cee, Cramer & Evans J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2920
                                                                                                              12
Computational Chemistry

                   Physical Organic Chemistry

                          transforms slowly at room temperature
                                                     O
                benzene                                   benzene
      endo                                    +       O                 exo
   diastereomer RT                                           Δ      diastereomer
                                                      O
      Kinetic                                                       Thermodynamic
      Product                                                          Product

                                                                                    13

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2016/CS/C6CS00573J
Computational Chemistry
                                                transforms slowly at room temperature
                                                                         O
                                      benzene                                  benzene
                             endo                                  +       O                exo
                          diastereomer RT                                        Δ      diastereomer
                                                                          O
                            Kinetic                                                     Thermodynamic
                            Product                                                        Product

                                                                                         20.4
                                       19.6                                               +
                                         +          ΔΔG

                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                               O
                             O
                       O                                                                                  O
                  O                                             0.0
                                                                 +
                   -6.7
                      +                                                        ΔΔGrxn                   -7.6
                                                                                                        +          14

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2016/CS/C6CS00573J
Computational Chemistry

                                                                    15

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2016/CS/C6CS00573J
Computational Chemistry

 Conformations
                      ΔG
                                       n = exp[-(ΔG2-ΔG1)/RT]    ni/∑n (%)
                   (kcal mol-1)
                       0.0                      1.00               83.4
                       1.0                      0.18               15.4

                       2.5                      0.01                1.2

                       5.0                      0.00                0.0

                                                1.20              100.0

                   T(K) = 298            R(kcal mol-1) = 0.001987
                                          R(kJ K-1 mol-1) = 8.3144598 ×10−3

                                                                              16

http://www.metadynamics.cz/eyring/eyring.html
Computational Chemistry
Kinetics                            k BT - DG
                                 k=     e              / RT

                                      h
                 T(K) = 298                 R(kcal mol-1) = 0.00831
                                            R(kJ K-1 mol-1) = 8.3144598 ×10−3

            h(J*s) = 6.6262 x 10-34             kb(J/K) = 1.3807 x 10-23

               ΔG‡                k                  t1/2
                                                                     t1/2
            (kcal mol-1)         (s-1)              (s-1)
                12            9.8 x 103           7.1 x 10-5       70.5μs
                17               2.11             3.3 x 10-1       327 ms

                22            4.5 x 10-4          1.5 x 103        25min

                27            9.8 x 10-8          7.1 x 106       81.1 days

                30            6.2 x 10-10         2.4 x 10-6     35.5 years
                                                                                17

http://www.metadynamics.cz/eyring/eyring.html
Computational Chemistry
  When there are competing pathways leading from interconverting intermediates, the product
ratio is determined by the relative heights of the highest energy barriers leading to the products"

                                                                                                      18

http://www.metadynamics.cz/eyring/eyring.html
Computational Chemistry

                    Experimental Determinations of Activation Parameters

                                      ΔG‡ = ΔH‡ – TΔS

entropy: energy associated with conformation, bond strength, vibrational states and how changes
in these properties affect the overall energy of the system.

enthalpy: can be related to the height of the surface while entropy is related to the width of the
channels leading from one energy well to another

                                                                                                     19

 http://www.metadynamics.cz/eyring/eyring.html
Computational Chemistry

                       Experimental Determinations of Activation Parameters
ions of Activation and Arrhenius Parameters
                                       ΔG‡ = ΔH‡ – TΔS
tically manipulated to give the equation of a line with a

                        Eyring plot

          kh                                  slope          H
    ln
          kBT
                                         y-intercept         S

                         1 / T (K-1)

equation allows one to experimentally determine values

                 Arrhenius plot

                                                                              20
                                              slope         Ea

    ln k
   http://www.metadynamics.cz/eyring/eyring.html
                                         y-intercept        A
What is DFT useful for?

                                        Phosphate/sulfate hydrolysis

                                                                            Dissociative
       Associative

                                                                           2.34   2.45
                                           n g

    2.27   1.75
                                       m i
                                   For
                                         Bond

                                                          P-r e a k i ng
                                                  B o n d B
                                                          Olg

                                                                                           21

Neese et al. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 034106
Kumar et al. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 2655
What is DFT useful for?

                                            Phosphate/sulfate hydrolysis
                                                                                                     associative         dissociative

          Linear Free energy Relationship (LFER)
                                                                                            -4
                                 a. 3,5-NO2                                                          -1.42±0.03
                                             NO2 O O                                                        NO2
                                 b.
                                O O 4-NO 2                                                 O-6 O                    O O                 X
2       O O                      c. 3-NO2-4-Cl
                                 S                 P   CH3                                   P                       P
                             X O d. O            O   O                                    O -8  O                  O   O
                                    3-NO2

                                                                             log k/ s-1
         P
       O   O                     e. 3,4-Cl                                                 -10
                                 f. 3-Cl                                                   -12
                                 g. 4-Cl
                                 h. H                                                      -14

                                                                                           -16

                                                                                           -18

                                                                                                 6     8      10     12       14

                                                                                                                   pKa

                                                                                                                                            22

    Duarte et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1081 (Cover article and Spotlight)
    Duarte et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10664
he aromatic ring.41 This      complexes (A), (C), (E), and (G) CCSD(T) calculations were also
    What is DFT useful for?
otein inter-residue inter-    carried out using a dielectric constant of 4.2 (diethyl ether) and
plexes can adopt at least     78.4 (water).                                                         30
haped) or parallel. While        In relation to the D6h symmetry of benzene, two vectors in the
 in gas-phase, parallel-      plane of the ring represent extreme scenarios of displacement –
 nd have been observed  Magnitudes and origins of nonbonded interactions
                              one towards a C–H bond (angle displacement) and the other
3
  We studied the parallel     towards a C–C bond (side displacement). These vectors are
 relevance.7,44 For [C6H6]    related by a rotation of m ¼ 30# about the C6 axis (Fig. 3). By       35
r and parallel arrange-       plotting a potential energy curve (PEC) with vertical distance
 ns.45 We included
              Cation–πboth   interactions                                  [C6H6][NH4]+                  [C6H6][Gdm]+
 y (Eint) of each model
 termolecular separation                                                                            40                    ]
el to the aromatic plane.
e center of mass of both
 x,y) displacements are
ng as shown (Fig. 3).
                                                                                                    45
generated at the domain-
                                                                             [C6H6][ImiP]+                [C6H6][ImiT]+
 d cluster with perturba-
T),46 level of theory. An
 is set, aug-cc-pVTZ, was
 TZ, and QZ quality basis                                                                           50
Na]+ complex (Fig. S1†).
 on closely matches that
asis, with an interaction Fig. 3 (Left) Parameters describing the relative geometry for PEC
CCSD(T) energies achieve calculations between the cation and benzene using the distance (R),
 compared to CCSD(T),47 vertical offset (Rz, along the normal) and horizontal offsets (Rx and Ry,     55
y considered benchmark parallel to the plane of benzene). (Right) The side and angle                                      23
                                 displacements of the cation relative to benzene corresponding to
on energies.48 DLPNO- vectors pointing to a C–C/C–H bond by adjusting X and Y coordinates,
   Neese
ganic      et al. J. is
       molecules      Chem.
                        accu-Phys.   2013, 138, 034106
                                 used to describe the difference in geometry between pairs of
   Kumar et al. Chem.  49  Sci. 2018, 9, 2655
We computed DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ interaction energies f
                                                                                                                                                                    24

                                                                                              along an intermolecular axis perpendicular to the aromatic plane, as show
                                                                                                                       –7.4 kcal mol–1

                 A                                                                                C                                        E                F
                                                                               [C6H6][Gdm]+
                            Magnitudes and origins of nonbonded interactions

                                                                                                  D

                                                                                                                       –7.5 kcal mol–1

                 B                                                                                D                                        F                G
                                                                                                  C

            -3                                                                                            3 kcal/mol
Figure 4. Top: DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ interaction energies (kcal mol–1) as a function of intermolecular
separation of cation–π complexes. Minimum energies (Emin) and equilibrium separations (Rz) shown. Bottom: NCI
isosurfaces at the minimum energy separations.
                                                                                                                                      12
                                                                                                                       –18.7 kcal mol–1
                                                                                                      A                                    C                    E
  What is DFT useful for?

                                                                                   [C6H6][NH4]+
                                                                                                  B

                                                                                                                       –19.2 kcal mol–1

                                                                                                                                                                         DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ
                                                                                                      B                                    D                    F

                                                                                                                                                                         CPCM-MP2/cc-pVTZ
                                                                                                  A
                                                                                                  -3                                           3 kcal/mol
                                                                                              Figure 4. Top: DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ interaction energies (kcal mol–1) as
What is DFT useful for?
Kinetic Catalytic Model                                                                                          Angewandte
                                                                                                                               Chemie

                                                                                       elimination to form a weakly
                                                                                       bonded complex 17 between the
                                                                                       product and [HCo(CO)3]. Finally,
                                                                                       to complete the formal catalytic
                                                                                       cycle, this species can release the
                                                                                       product and add carbon monoxide.
                                                                                             DFT optimisation and frequency
                                                                                           While the above cycle is de-
                                                                                       scribed as starting from monomeric
                                                                                             B3LYP/6-311G(d)
                                                                                       1, this species is known to be in
                                                                                       (fairly rapid) equilibrium with
                                                                                       [Co2(CO)8] 23 under catalytic con-
                                                                                       ditions. For this species CCSD(T)
                                                                                             Single-point energies
                                                                                       calculations are not possible
                                                                                             CCSD(T)-F12 (explicit treatment of
                                                                                       (because of computational expense
                                                                                       and multireference behavior) so
                                                                                             electron correlation).
                                                                                       our computed energy is based on
                                                                                       DFT. The calculated free energy
                                                                                       change of 30.6 kJ mol!1 for forming
                                                                                       two equivalents of 1 from 23 and
                                                                                       hydrogen is in good agreement
                                                                                       with the experimental value mea-
                                                                                       sured in heptane (22.6 kJ mol!1).[17]
                                                                                           Alkene      hydrogenation      is
                                                                                       a wasteful side reaction in some
                                                                                       applications of hydroformylation,
                                                                                       but has not been considered in
                                                                                       previous studies of the cobalt-cata-
                                                                                       lyzed reaction.[10] We propose that
                                                                                       it occurs from intermediate 6, by
                                                                                       addition of H2 instead of CO, to
                                                                                       yield the dihydrogen complex 20,
                                                                                       over a low barrier TS19. In contrast
                                                                                       to the case of the related complex
                                                                                       13, which yields product 18 through
                                                                                                                                        25
    Scheme 1. Modeled catalytic cycle for alkene hydroformylation and hydrogenation.   oxidative addition/reductive elimi-
                                                                                       nation, release of propane 22 is
Harvey et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 8672                                      found to occur through a one-step
                                                                                       s-bond metathesis over TS21. This
Which Softwares Do I Use?
                                               !Turbomole 6.2 $$
                                               http://www.turbomole.com
Gaussian 09/16 $$$$$$
                                               !Q-Chem 3.2 $$$$
http://www.gaussian.com
                                               http://www.q-chem.com
General purpose, easy interface
                                               !Molpro7 $$$$
                                               http://www.molpro.net
!ADF 2010 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
                                               Accurate correlated ab initio methods
http://www.scm.com
General purpose, DFT-oriented
                                               !Molcas 7$?
                                               http://www.teokem.lu.se/molcas
!Jaguar 2010 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
                                               Excited states (CASSCF, RASSCF, CASPT2)
http://www.schrodinger.com/products/14/7
General purpose, fast DFT
                                               !Crystal 09 $
!Spartan’10 $$
                                               http://www.crystal.unito.it
http://www.wavefun.com/products/spartan.html
                                               General purpose, fast DFT and post-HF
General purpose, GUI included
                                               Solid state and physics, periodic conditions
                                                                                              26
Which Softwares Do I Use?
                                                   !Abinit 6.6
   !GAMESS Oct1, 2010                              http://www.abinit.org

   http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/gamess               Light and portable DFT code

   General purpose and highly scalable             !Dirac 6.6
   !NWChem 6.0                                     http://wiki.chem.vu.nl/dirac/index.php/Dirac_Program

   http://www.nwchem-sw.org                        Properties using relativistic calculations

   General purpose and intensively parallelized    !Siesta 3.0
   !Orca 2.8                                       http://www.icmab.es/siesta

   http://www.thch.uni-bonn.de/tc/orca             Simulations of materials

   General purpose, extra-fast RI-DFT and RI-CC    !CPMD 3.13
   !Dalton 2.0                                     http://www.cpmd.org

   http://www.kjemi.uio.no/software/dalton         Carr-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics

   General purpose, multi-reference calculations   !CP2K
   !Mopac 2009                                     http://cp2k.berlios.de

   http://openmopac.net/MOPAC2009.html             Solid state, liquids and biological simulations

   Semiempirical methods (PM3, PM6)                !Octopus 3.2
   !SAPT 2008                                      http://www.tddft.org/programs/octopus/wiki

   http://www.physics.udel.edu/~szalewic/SAPT      Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory
                                                   TDDFT                                                  27
Break

        28
You can also read