Specifying Fly Ash for Use in Concrete

 
CONTINUE READING
Specifying Fly Ash for Use in Concrete
As seen in Concrete InFocus, Spring 2008
feature

Specifying Fly Ash
for Use in Concrete
By Karthik H. Obla, Ph.D., P.E.
Managing Director, Research & Materials Engineering, NRMCA

                                  O
                                           ver the past several decades, the use of fly ash in concrete has had a successful track
                                           record. The performance benefits fly ash provides to mechanical and durability
                                           properties of concrete have been well researched and documented in actual struc-
                                  tures. Currently, fly ash is used in more than 50% of all ready mixed concrete placed in the
                                  United States, yet many design professionals continue to remain overly restrictive when it
                                  comes to using fly ash in concrete.
                                     This article addresses some optimal ways of specifying fly ash for use in concrete while
                                  ensuring that the desired concrete performance is achieved. Most of these recommendations
                                  form part of a larger NRMCA publication that should be released later in 2008. Project speci-
                                  fications for most commercial work in the United States are typically written as per American
                                  Institute of Architects MasterSpec format. Any cementitious material is typically addressed
                                  under Section 2.5 (Concrete Materials) of that format as follows.

                                  Cementitious materials: Use materials meeting the following
                                  requirements:
                                      Hydraulic Cement: ASTM C150 or ASTM C1157 or ASTM C595
                                      
                                      Pozzolan or Fly Ash: ASTM C618
                                      
                                      Slag: ASTM C989
                                      
                                      Silica Fume: ASTM C1240
                                      The above format clearly states that fly ash has to meet ASTM C618, which is the standard
                                  specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. This by
Currently, fly ash is used in     itself is adequate for specifying fly ash in concrete. Frequently, design professionals make it
more than 50% of all ready        more complicated and too restrictive. Some of these restrictions, the possible rationale behind
mixed concrete placed in          them and issues related to not having these restrictions are discussed below.
the United States, yet many
                                  Limitations on quantity of fly ash
design professionals continue
                                      This is perhaps the most frequently applied restriction governing the use of fly ash in a con-
to remain overly restrictive      crete specification. When fly ash was originally used in concrete in the 1970s, there was some
when it comes to using fly        basis for restricting its use. However, after extensive research and several decades of successful
ash in concrete.                  utilization of fly ash, there is no basis for a restriction on the quantity of fly ash that should be
                                  permitted to be used in concrete. Some may say that the ACI 318 Building Code restricts fly

60   ı   SPRING 2008
Specifying Fly Ash for Use in Concrete
Impact of Fly Ash LOI (carbon) on Air Entrainment
                            10

                            9

                            8

                            7
 Concrete Air Content (%)

                            6                                                                                                Source B
                                                                                                                             Source C
                                                                                                                             Source D
                            5                                                                                                Source H
                                                                                                                             Source C
                            4                                                                                                Source E

                            3

                            2
                                                                                                                        Cement Micrograph
                            1                                                                                           Fly Ash Micrograph (note spherical particles)
                                                                                                                        Impact of Fly Ash LOI (Carbon) on Air Entrainment Hill,
                                                                                                                        R.L., and Folliard, K.J. (2006)
                            0
                                 0   1              2               3                4               5              6
                                                          Loss on Ignition (LOI) %

ash use to 25% of total cementitious content.                 ash frequently is required. Also, with greater    may argue that by restricting LOI contents,
However, that is inaccurate. The new ACI                      quantities of fly ash, the durability of con-      the air-entrainment problems due to fly ash
318-08 Building Code in Chapter 4 defines                      crete related to resistance to ASR, sulfate at-   can be reduced. However, that is inaccurate.
very severe freeze-thaw exposure (Exposure                    tack and chloride-induced corrosion is fur-       Figure 1 illustrates that at the same LOI, dif-
Class F3) as concrete exposed to freezing                     ther enhanced. Further, the use of fly ash in      ferent fly ashes can lead to different perfor-
and thawing cycles that will be in continu-                   concrete supports sustainable construction.       mance related to generating the necessary air
ous contact with moisture and exposed to                          While it is true that greater quantities of   content. In fact, the low-LOI fly ash in that
deicing chemicals. For concrete structural                    fly ash can delay setting and early strength       study was more sensitive to air entrainment
members subject to Exposure Class F3, there                   gain, these could be addressed to a large         than the higher-LOI fly ash. The reason for
is a limitation on the quantity of supplemen-                 extent through the effective use of chemi-         this is that certain fly ashes have finer car-
tary cementitious materials, expressed as a                   cal admixtures. The concrete producer can         bon, which, in spite of lower LOI, can have
percentage of the total cementitious materi-                  evaluate the setting and early strength-gain      a more significant effect on air entrainment.
als, as follows:                                              characteristics of concrete containing fly         So, restricting the LOI of fly ash to 2% or
1. Fly ash or other C618 pozzolans – max:                     ash under varying ambient conditions to           4% does not eliminate the problems with air
     25 percent                                               assure the contractor that these needs will       entrainment.
2. Total of fly ash or other pozzolans and                     be achieved. It should be left to the concrete        The issue is not the LOI but rather the
     silica fume – max: 35 percent                            producer to optimize concrete mixtures to         variability of carbon content and type at a
3. Combined fly ash, pozzolan and silica                       accommodate different quantities of fly ash.        given source. If the carbon content and type
     fume – max: 50 percent with fly ash or                        Prescriptive limits on fly ash amounts do      varies frequently (even as often as during
     pozzolan not exceeding 25 percent and                    not help concrete performance in any way          the day) in an unpredictable manner, then
     silica fume not exceeding 10 percent                     and may actually limit the improvement in         it will be challenging for the concrete pro-
4. Ground granulated blast-furnace slag                       concrete durability.                              ducer to supply air-entrained concrete with
     – max: 50 percent                                                                                          consistent levels of entrained air. This is re-
5. Silica fume – max: 10 percent                              Limitations on the loss on                        ally a quality-control issue that the fly ash
     The primary reason for these limits in                   ignition (LOI) of fly ash to less                 marketer and concrete supplier have to re-
the Building Code is to minimize the po-                      than x% (x = 2 is typically 2 or 4)               solve through frequent testing. The fly ash
tential for deicer-related surface scaling that                  Most commercially available fly ashes           marketer can do a quick indicator test every
can subsequently compromise the concrete                      will not meet this specification limitation,       four truckloads and supply that information
cover over reinforcement and initiate corro-                  so in effect, this requirement will prevent        to the concrete producer when delivering
sion earlier than expected. There is no tech-                 fly ash use. In fact, C618 already has a LOI       the fly ash load. The concrete producer can
nical reason to extend this maximum 25%                       limit of 6%.                                      adjust the air-entrainment dosage on that
limit for other applications. It is seen that                    LOI is a measure of unburnt carbon in          basis and confirm the air content of the pro-
for adequate resistance to alkali silica reac-                fly ash. Certain forms of unburnt carbon           duced concrete. Some of the indicator tests
tion (ASR) with some types of aggregate and                   can absorb air-entraining admixtures and          are LOI, mortar air content and fly ash foam
for sulfate resistance, more than 25% of fly                   affect air entrainment of concrete. So, some       index test.

                                                                                                                                            CONCRETE     in focus   ı   61
Specifying Fly Ash for Use in Concrete
Specifying a maximum LOI limit does            This will allow for necessary quality-control   also used. Slag cement may be the preferred
not resolve the air-entrainment problems           actions if necessary.                           supplementary cementitious material in
related to fly ash use and might in fact pro-                                                       some markets. Concrete producers will gen-
vide a false sense of security because these ef-   Limitation on mixture                           erally not stock more than one or two types
fects may not be determined before concrete        proportioning, such as replacing                of supplementary cementitious materials.
is placed in the structure.                        “1.2 pounds of fly ash per pound                Project specifications must address local
                                                   of cement”                                      availability and experience to allow fly ash
28-day strength requirement                            This mixture-proportioning approach         and pozzolans meeting C618, slag meeting
    In general, concrete containing fly             was popular when fly-ash use in concrete was     C989 and silica fume meeting C1240 in the
ash has a slower rate of strength develop-         in its infancy and the use of chemical admix-   specification.
ment and often results in a higher later-age       tures was not very prevalent. The objective         It is true that Class F fly ash is more ef-
strength than with portland cement con-            was to achieve 28-day strength equivalent       fective in increasing concrete’s resistance to
crete. In some projects, there may not be a        to a portland cement concrete mixture with      ASR and sulfate attack. However, rather
need for a 28-day strength requirement for         some sources and types of fly ash, cement,       than disallowing Class C fly ash, durabil-
members or classes of concrete that will not       aggregates and chemical admixtures. It was      ity can be ensured through a performance
have anticipated construction or service           understood early on that there is no magic      specification as discussed below:
loads applied at 28 days. For example, speci-      replacement ratio of cement with fly ash.
fying 8,000-psi compressive strength to be         The optimum replacement level will depend       Requirement for Class F fly ash
                                                                                                   for resistance to Alkali Silica
                                                                                                   Reaction (ASR)
                                                                                                       Design professionals often specify pre-
Fly ash has to meet ASTM C618, which is the standard                                               scriptive requirements such as quantities
specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural                                         of Class F fly ash, slag, low-alkali cement,
pozzolan for use in concrete. This by itself is adequate for                                       the use of a non-reactive aggregate, etc., to
specifying fly ash in concrete.                                                                    avoid ASR-related distress in structures.
                                                                                                   Class C fly ash may not be allowed. Con-
                                                                                                   crete resistance to ASR can be ensured by
                                                                                                   incorporating the performance option pro-
                                                                                                   vided below in the concrete specification:
achieved at 56 instead of 28 days for columns      on the strength targets at different ages, the       Alkali silica reactivity – If the aggregate
will result in highly optimized mixtures. A        properties being targeted, climactic condi-     is deemed reactive as per Section XX.X and
later-age strength requirement when feasible       tions, the use of admixtures and cement and     for structural concrete members that will
will permit a higher quantity of supplemen-        fly ash sources. The concrete producer must      be moist in service, submit documentation
tary cementitious materials, reduce the total      be allowed to tailor concrete mixture pro-      qualifying the proposed cementitious ma-
cementitious content (paste volume) and            portions to satisfy strength, durability and    terials used with the aggregate by ASTM
therefore reduce the potential for cracking        fresh properties such as workability, setting   C1567 tests with an expansion after 14 days
while improving long-term concrete dura-           time, etc.                                      of exposure less than or equal to 0.1%.
bility. Many projects have been successfully                                                           C1567 is a standard test method for
completed where the specified strength had          Limitations on the class of fly ash             determining potential alkali-silica reactiv-
to be attained at 56 days.                         or supplementary cementitious                   ity (ASR) of combinations of cementitious
    If there is a need to obtain information       material                                        materials and aggregate. Generally, fly ash,
about the acceptability of concrete strength          Some specifications only permit the use       silica fume and slag are used to mitigate
at an earlier age, one might use a percent-        of C618 Class F fly ash. In many parts of the    problems associated with deleterious ASR,
age of the specified strength at the desig-         country, good quality Class C fly ash is also    with increasing levels typically leading to
nated earlier age or an accelerated curing         available. In some regions, a good quality      improved resistance. If the aggregate is
procedure in accordance with ASTM C684.            Class N pozzolan, such as calcined clay, is     deemed reactive, the concrete supplier can
                                                                                                   perform ASTM C1567 tests with different
                                                                                                   types and proportions of supplementary ce-
                                                                                                   mentitious materials and choose the combi-
When fly ash was originally used in concrete in the 1970s,                                         nation that yields a 14-day expansion lower
there was some basis for restricting its use. However,                                             than 0.1%. For example, if 25% fly ash A
after extensive research and several decades of successful                                         shows expansion below 0.1%, the concrete
utilization of fly ash, there is no basis for a restriction                                        supplier should use at least 25% of that fly
on the quantity of fly ash that should be permitted                                                ash in the mixture proportions. Th is is a
                                                                                                   better approach because more than 70% of
to be used in concrete.
                                                                                                   the aggregates are typically found to test as
                                                                                                   potentially reactive to ASR by the ASTM

62   ı   SPRING 2008
IT STANDS LIKE A MONUMENT TO
YOUR GOOD BUSINESS JUDGMENT.
Ready mix producers around the world depend on CON-E-CO® batch plants to maximize productivity and keep their fleets running
profitably. The quality and reliability are renowned. And you get 24/7 access to the industry’s best dealer network and factory
support. Contact your local CON-E-CO dealer today. Or visit our web site and use the Configurator to spec one for your business.

P.O. Box 430 • Blair, NE 68008 • 402-426-4181                         www.con-e-co.com

           © 2008 Concrete Equipment Company. CON-E-CO and the CON-E-CO logo are registered trademarks of Concrete Equipment Company, Blair, NE. An Oshkosh Corporation.
C1260, Potential Reactivity of Aggregates      limit on the available alkali content of fly    limits. Therefore, there is no need for a
(Mortar-Bar Method). Most of the aggre-        ash. Research indicated that there was         separate limit on the total alkali content
gates that test to be potentially reactive     no good correlation between the mea-           of fly ash.
show good field performance. Disallowing        sured available alkali content and the
Class C fly ash on the basis that the aggre-    performance of the fly ash to mitigate          The requirement of a certain
gate fails the C1260 test or even the C1293    ASR. Th is limit has been deleted from         quantity, type of fly ash or
concrete prism test is not a good approach.    C618 and it is not measured by marketers       another supplementary
The use of C1567 test limits allows the pos-   of fly ash. Th is requirement, however,         cementitious material for
                                                                                              resistance to chloride ion
                                                                                              penetration
                                                                                                  For concrete exposed to chlorides (deic-
With greater quantities of fly ash, the durability of concrete                                ing chemicals, marine exposure), it is well
related to resistance to ASR, sulfate attack and                                              known that fly ash, silica fume and slag
chloride-induced corrosion is further enhanced.                                               can increase resistance to deterioration re-
                                                                                              lated to the corrosion of reinforcing steel
Further, the use of fly ash in concrete supports
                                                                                              by reducing chloride ion penetrability of
sustainable construction.                                                                     concrete, with increasing levels typically
                                                                                              leading to improved performance. Howev-
                                                                                              er, it is not advisable to invoke prescriptive
                                                                                              proportions, type and choice of fly ash,
sibility of using Class C fly ash at different   continues to remain in some project speci-     silica fume and slag to attain the improved
dosages while ensuring that the concrete       fications. However, if the total alkali of fly   performance.
can attain resistance to ASR.                  ash is high (> 5% Na2O equivalent), the fly         The ASTM C1202 test, which re-
                                               ash has not been found to be effective in       ally measures the electrical conductivity
Limits on the available alkali of              controlling ASR. These high-alkali fly          of concrete, provides a rapid indication
fly ash                                        ashes, when tested with reactive aggregate,    of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion
   ASTM C618 used to have an optional          will exceed the ASTM C1567 expansion           penetration. By requiring a low C1202

    ı
64355860_odisa.indd
     SPRING 2008      1                                                                                                   11/2/07 1:48:55 PM
coulomb level, the design professional en-                                                       tary cementitious materials judiciously to
                                                   The use of silica fume without
sures that the concrete mixture will have a                                                      attain target performance levels. The use
                                                   any other supplementary
potential for low chloride ion penetrability                                                     of a lower quantity (3% to 4%) of a highly
                                                   cementitious material
without establishing prescriptive limits on                                                      reactive pozzolan such as silica fume with
the quantity, choice and types of fly ash,              A concrete specification that requires     fly ash or slag can lead to optimum early
slag or silica fume. If the test option is         the use of, say, 7% silica fume without any   age strength, fresh concrete properties and
used, it will need some necessary lead time        other supplementary cementitious mate-        significant long-term durability benefits.
for developing and testing one or more             rial may not be an optimized mixture for
mixtures. Depending on the criteria, a val-        the application. The design professional      Reference to water to cement
ue of 1,500 to 2,000 coulombs at 28 days           should focus on the intended performance      ratio (w/c)
might be selected as the criterion. The test       requirement (permeability, resistance to         It is common for concrete to have sup-
samples must be standard cured for seven           ASR, sulfate attack, etc.) and allow the      plementary cementitious materials such as
days, followed by 21 days of curing in             concrete producer to combine supplemen-       fly ash and slag that are included in the
100-degree water. For standard laboratory
curing, the test period should be extended
to at least 56 days to recognize the benefit
provided by fly ash. The use of C1202 test
criteria provides freedom to the concrete
producer to optimize mixture proportions
while ensuring that concrete of low chlo-
ride ion penetrability is used.
    Note that the C1202 test has a high
testing variability and is not very suitable
for the testing of samples obtained at the
                                                                   your advantage
jobsite. It is suggested to be used primarily
to qualify concrete mixtures. For critical
projects, if the design professional is inter-
ested in the use of C1202 criteria for con-                  CONCRETE
crete acceptance, a more rigorous statisti-                       WHERE
cal approach is appropriate, as discussed in
Reference 8.                                                            YOU

                                                                NEED IT,
Requirement for Class F Fly
ash for resistance to sulfate                                          WHEN
attack                                                                  YOU
    For different levels of sulfate exposure,
the 318 Building Code has w/cm, com-                            NEED IT.
pressive strength and cementitious type
requirements. Concrete containing Class
C fly ash is not known to be very effective
against sulfate attack. Therefore, engineers
prescribe only Class F fly ash for concrete                                    With CemenTech Volumetric Concrete
exposed to sulfate environments. The new                                      Mixers you can reach more job sites, more
318-08 Code adopts a more progressive
                                                                              economically. Short loads or large pours,
approach and allows a performance-based
evaluation of the proposed cementitious                                       CemenTech delivers consistent, quality
materials by ASTM C1012. The code also                                        concrete every time — putting CemenTech
permits the evidence of past successful                                       users at a significant advantage.
field performance to be used. The use of
C1012 criteria ensures that the concrete
is resistant to sulfate attack and does not
restrict the use of Class C fly ash or any
other material. The one disadvantage of
this approach is the considerable lead time
needed, since tests progress for six months
to one year.

                                             356048_Cementech.indd 1                                                           12/11/07
                                                                                                                        CONCRETE in focus   ı 9:11:22
                                                                                                                                               65 PM
Annual Book of ASTM Standards Vol-
                                                                                                            ume 4.01, ASTM International, West
      The design professional should focus on the intended                                                  Conshohocken, Pa., www.astm.org
                                                                                                         4. ASTM C618, C989, C1202, C1240,
      performance requirement (permeability, resistance to ASR,
                                                                                                            C1260, C1293, C1567, Annual Book
      sulfate attack, etc.) and allow the concrete producer to combine                                      of ASTM Standards Volume 4.02,
      supplementary cementitious materials judiciously to attain target                                     ASTM International
      performance levels.                                                                                5. ACI 318-05, “Building Code Require-
                                                                                                            ments for Structural Concrete,” ACI
                                                                                                            Manual of Concrete Practice, Ameri-
                                                                                                            can Concrete Institute, www.aci-int.
      calculation of w/cm. The ACI 318 Building    be determined by placing trial slabs rather              org
      Code has limitations on the maximum wa-      than the prescriptive minimum cementi-                6. Hill, R.L., and Folliard, K.J., (2006),
      ter-to-cementitious-materials ratio (w/cm)   tious material content approach, which does              “The Impact of Fly Ash on Air-En-
      for various durability requirements. Re-     not necessarily ensure good fi nishability.               trained Concrete,” Concrete InFocus,
      ferring to w/c may be misleading, and this   Also, a high minimum cementitious mate-                  Fall 2006, pp. 71-72.
      should always be referred to as water-to-    rial content frequently leads to non-opti-            7. Thomas, Michael, “Optimizing the
      cementitious-materials ratio (w/cm).         mized mixtures, high paste contents, higher              Use of Fly Ash in Concrete,” Portland
                                                   shrinkage, high temperatures due to heat of              Cement Association, Publication IS
      Minimum cementitious content                 hydration and associated cracking.       ■               548, 2007, 24 pages
      requirements                                                                                       8. Obla, Karthik, and Lobo, Colin,
          ACI 301 and 302 recommend mini-                                                                   “Acceptance Criteria for Durability
      mum cementitious material content (not       References                                               Tests,” Concrete International, Ameri-
      cement) for floor slabs only, primarily to    1. Guide Toward Improving Concrete                       can Concrete Institute, May 2007, pp.
      improve fi nishability. There is no techni-      Specifications, NRMCA publication                      43-48.
      cally valid reason to include a minimum         (under development)                                9. ACI 301, 302, ACI Manual of Con-
      cementitious content for other structural    2. Master Spec, Cast in Place Concrete,                  crete Practice, ACI, www.aci-int.org.
      elements, provided the performance re-          Section 03300, American Institute of                  For more information, contact Obla
      quirements for that element are achieved.       Architects, http://www.arcomnet.com/               at 240-485-1163 or via e-mail at kobla@
      Even for floor slabs, the fi nishability can   3. ASTM C150, C595, C1012, C1157,                     nrmca.org.

                              Visit our Buyers’ Guide online at NRMCA.OfficialBuyersGuide.net

       STOP
                                                                 Kemco Systems is a proud member

                                 LOSING                              and supporter of the NRMCA

                                                                                                             Thank
                                 BUSINESS!
        Don’t let hot water shortages slow you down,

                                                                                                              You
         ensure your hot water supply keeps up with
                                      YOUR demand.                                      RM99
                                                                                        Direct
       The RM99 Direct Contact Water Heater                                             Contact
                                                                                        Water

                                                                                                           to the advertisers
        • 99.7% fuel efficient                                                          Heater
        • Instantaneous hot water
        • Stainless steel, non-pressurized unit
                                                                       KEMCO SYSTEMS
        • Convenient 4-point connection
                                                                                                                        who made
       To schedule an on-site plant analysis or
       for information contact Kemco Systems
          800.633.7055                                                                                          this publication possible
          www.kemcosystems.com
          sales@kemcosystems.com

          ı
254429_Kemco.indd
      66 SPRING   1 2008                                                            7/31/06 9:38:12 AM
You can also read