Tecnologie ICT e Robotiche per l'autonomia delle persone anziane e per il supporto al caregiver - Ansdipp

Page created by Jaime Lowe
 
CONTINUE READING
Tecnologie ICT e Robotiche per l’autonomia delle
      persone anziane e per il supporto al caregiver

Filippo Cavallo
Assistant Professor
The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna
Head of the Assistive Robotics Laboratory
filippo.cavallo@santannapisa.it
Assistive Robotics Laboratory
Advanced ICT Robotics for better Quality of Life (active and healthy ageing,
neurodegenerative and chronic diseases, co-working, home consumer)

 •   To promote and evaluate novel service robotics for active and
     healthy ageing in order to foster independent living

 •   To identify and validate disruptive healthcare paradigms for
     neurodegenerative and chronic diseases, focusing on prevention
     and support for physical and cognitive declines

 •   To optimize the management of working life for improving efficiency,
     security and QoL of workers in industrial settings.
Assistive Robotics Laboratory
Advanced ICT Robotics for better Quality of Life (active and healthy ageing,
neurodegenerative and chronic diseases, co-working, home consumer)

-   Large experimental sites in assisted
    living (150+ elderly, 200+ stakeholders)
-   Clinical validation for early diagnosis
    and therapies in Parkinson (800+
    subjects)
-   Cognitive Frailty studies and adaptive
    coaching support (30+ subjects and
    MCI)
Questions!

•   Are ICT and Robotics a reasonable solution for future
    caring scenarios?

•   What kind of integration is required to achieve technically
    feasible and human centred acceptable solutions?

•   Are these scenarios sustainable for the society, by an
    economic, social and ethical point of view?

•   Do we have already concrete solutions and / or best
    practices?
Peter Wintlev-Jensen
    Demographic Ageing:                                     Deputy Head of Unit
                                                          European Commission
                                                              DG CONNECT H2
societal needs and opportunities
 Social Necessity                         Major Opportunity
     Dependency Ratio                         Empowerment
     •From 1:4 to 1:2                         • Active Ageing
     •80+ doubles by 2025

     Cost of Care                             New Care Models
     •Up by 4-8 % of GDP by 2025              •Integrated care
                                              •Large Efficiency gains

     Human Resources                          Growth and Markets
     •Shrinking work force                    •3000 B€ Wealth
     •Lacking 20 million carers by 2020       •85 Million Consumers and
                                              growing
                                                          ••• 5
Demographic dependency ratio
 •   In 2060 one potential carer (i.e. a person aged 45-64) is expected for 51
     persons of 80 years old or more. This hints at the potential gap between
     supply and demand of care
 •   The decrease of working-age population will lead to an increase in the
     demand for nurse practitioners (+94% in 2025) and physicians assistants
     (+72% in 2025), as well as an increased need for a higher level of care and for
     future assistance.
Some numbers in Italy *

 Average cost for one day in hospital: 700-800€ per person;
 1 old person out of 6 in Italy is not self-sufficient;
 1 old person out of 3 in Italy has suffer from a chronic disease;
 In Italy Il sistema sanitario nazionale risponde bene a problemi sanitari acuti, ma
   non all’assistenza in generale;
 Every 100 young people, threre are 161 elderly 65+;
 900.000 «badanti» in Italy (up to 1800€/month);
 11M Italians have used private insurance for future assistance;
 Available beds in residential or semi-residential facilities are 233.000 in Italy (1/3 of
   France and ¼ of Germany);
 760.000 elderly people out of potential 2.7M are using social and health services;
 In 2035, more than 100.000 additional caregivers and operators are required;
 Differences between North and Sud, 10:1.                  * Marcella Cocchi, da La Nazione del 31/03/2017
Service Areas

 Prevention
 Compensation and Support
 Independent and Active Ageing
Robot-Era at a glance
Services provided by a set of autonomous and well orchestrated mobile robots
integrated in smart environments : outdoor, condominium and domestic (3D
service robotics)

•   Duration 2012 - 2015
•   Total Project Cost: € 8.700.000
          The Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
          Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
 7 robots developed                                           1 innovative method
  for indoor andRobot-Era
                 urban                                   Numberfor acceptability
  environments                                                 1 day for setting a
 6/7    the   average                                          robot         (almost
  Technology                                                    plug&play)
  Readiness Level                                              3 real use-cases
                                                               2 Living labs in Italy
                                                                and Sweden
                                                               200+     stakeholders
                                                                in co-design phases
                                                               155 users tested the
                                                                robots

Robot-Era in
numbersThe Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
       Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
Analysis of end-users needs and
                                service definition

Robot-Era Services Definition

       Communication

    Indoor escort at night

          Reminding

   Outdoor walking support

       Laundry support

  Drug and shopping delivery

      Garbage collection

        Food delivery

    Objects transportation

         The Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
         Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
Robot-Era innovation
    Services provided by a set of autonomous and well orchestrated mobile robots
    integrated in smart environments : outdoor, condominium and domestic (3D
    service robotics)

•    Di Nuovo, A., Broz, F., Cavallo, F., & Dario, P. (2016). New Frontiers of Service Robotics for Active and Healthy Ageing.
     International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(3), 353-354.
•    Moschetti, A., Fiorini, L., Esposito, D., Dario, P., & Cavallo, F. (2016). Recognition of daily gestures with wearable inertial rings
     and bracelets. Sensors, 16(8), 1341.
•    Fiorini, L., Esposito, R., Bonaccorsi, M., Petrazzuolo, C., Saponara, F., Giannantonio, R., De Petris, G., Dario, P. & Cavallo, F.
     (2016). Enabling personalised medical support for chronic disease management through a hybrid robot-cloud approach.
     Autonomous Robots, 1-14.
•    Cavallo, F., Limosani, R., Manzi, A., Bonaccorsi, M., Esposito, R., Di Rocco, M., ... & Dario, P. (2014). Development of a socially
     believable multi-robot solution from town to home. Cognitive Computation, 6(4), 954-967.

                   The Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
                   Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
Robotic patients lift and transfer

•    Manual handling is the highest accident trigger reported to the Health and
     Safety Authority (HSA) by the healthcare sector [1];
•    The most common cause of reported incidents was lifting or carrying (41%
     of reported incidents in 2010);
•    1 in every 3 nurses becomes injured from the physical exertion put forth
     while moving non-ambulatory patients, costing their employers $35,000 per
     injured nurse;
•    Over the coming years, the declining ratio of working age adults to elderly
     will further exacerbate the shortage;

[1] Analysis of the causes and costs of Manual Handling Incidents in the Health Care sector, Irish Health and
Safety authority 2007.
[2] Roger Bostelman, James Albu, “Robotic Patient Lift and Transfer”, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, USA
Technical Solutions

•   Ergonomics
•   Service robotics with physical interaction abilities
Agile Co-Creation of Robots for
                                              Ageing
MISSION:
◆Advanced ICT Robotics based solutions for ageing
◆Agile co-creation development process
◆Interoperability and flexibility of platform

EU Partners:
1. TRIALOG (France)
2. Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna (Italy)
3. Erasmus University Rotterdam
    (The Netherlands)
4. Paris Dauphine (France)
5. Bluefrog robotics (France)
6. Fondazione Casa Sollievo della               - Horizon 2020 SC1-PM-14-2016 (2M€)
    Sofferenza (Italy)                          - EU-Japan cooperation on Novel ICT
                                                  Robotics based solutions for active
JP Partners:
1. Kyoto University                               and healthy ageing at home or in care
2. Kobe University                                facilities)
3. Connect Dot Ltd                              - Horizon 2020 and NICT.
                                          ▶15
Robot Companion Evolution in
                                 Walking Support
            2012                           2015                       2018
                                          •Active Walking           •Handle pressure
                                           Support                   / force sensors
        •Passive Walking                                             for HRI
         Support                          •Handle buttons
Astro                        Roboti-Era    for HRI          ACCRA   •HR Shared
        •Gentle Spring                                               control
         based actuation                  •Obstacle
                                           avoidance for            •Human walk
                                           safety                    analysis

                                          ▶16
Telecare and telemonitoring

•   The Scottish Telehealth and Telecare Delivery Plan (STTDP) [Edimburg, 2012]
    generated savings for about € 113 million in the period 2006-2010, offering for
    example decision support using video conferencing and the remote monitoring of
    data from alarm/telecare services using call-center.
•   The US Veterans Health Administration [Darknis, A., 2013], claimed savings for up
    to 1999$ per patients using telehealth instead of the traditional care paradigm.
•   Results indicated that elderly persons who perceived telecare as useful in solving
    health problems, had the intention to use the program, and were willing to continue
    use, also had a better perception toward quality of life regarding their interpersonal
    relationships and living environment [Chou, 2013].
Domestic Robot (DORO)

Validated in realistic
    environment

 Dimensions                 (W x L x H) 610 x 735 x 1550 mm
 Weight                     about 65 kg
 Actuation                  differential with two high torque EC gear-motors
 Speed                      Typical: 0.8m/s, - Max: 1.4 m/s
 Localization               AMCL algorithm based on laser data
 Obstacle detection         SickS 300 - Hokuyo URG-04LX Laser sensors.
 Obstacle detection         up to 30 m on the front – up to 4 m on the back
 Power                      24 VDC
 Batteries                  24 V lithium batteries with 60 Amp-hrs
 Battery runtime            about 16h, Recharging time: about 6 hours
 Safety                     One emergency button, bumper around the base
 Arm payload                1.5 kg
 Arm max velocity           20cm/s
 Arm range                  90cm
 Removable Tablet           10.1 tablet, Apple iPad
 Software                  Cognidrive and ROS based. Autonomous navigation with obstacle avoidance provided with common
                           interfaces of the ROS navigation stack.

                   The Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
                   Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
Condominium Robot (CORO)

validated in realistic
    environment

Dimensions                 (W x L x H) 610 x 735 x 1550 mm
Weight                     about 65 kg
Actuation                  differential with two high torque EC gear-motors
Speed                      Typical: 0.8m/s, - Max: 1.4 m/s
Localization               AMCL algorithm based on laser data
Obstacle detection         SickS 300 - Hokuyo URG-04LX Laser sensors.
Obstacle detection         up to 30 m on the front – up to 4 m on the back
Power                      24 VDC
Batteries                  24 V lithium batteries with 60 Amp-hrs
Battery runtime            About 16h, Recharging time: about 6 hours
99Safety                   One emergency button. Bumper around the base.
Roller dimension           (W x L) 345 x 345 mm
Removable Tablet           7” tablet, Nexus 7 9
Software                  Cognidrive and ROS based. Autonomous navigation with obstacle avoidance provided with common
                          interfaces of the ROS navigation stack.

                  The Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
                  Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
Outdoor Robot (ORO)

Dimensions                  (W x L x H) 75 x 100 x 145 cm
Weight                      about 150 kg
Actuation                   2 Swissdrive 400 T hub motor by Micro-Motor AG, 24 VDC, 400W
Speed                       Typical: 3 km/h, 0.83 m/s - Max: 4.5 Km/h 1.25 m/s
Maximum slope               20%
Localization                Novatel FLEX6-D2L-R0G-TTR (GPS) plus FLEX6-D2S-Z00-00N
(Align unit)
Localization accuracy Position < 3 cm, Heading < 0.1° (NTRIP provided and enough visible
satellites)                                                                                          system complete
Obstacle detection          Hokuyo UTM-30LX Laser and US/IR sensors                                   and qualified
Obstacle detection          0.1 – 30m
Power                       24 VDC
Batteries                   Lead-acid gel batteries 2 x 12V 100Ah
Battery runtime             About 10h, Recharging time: about 6 hours
Safety                      Two emergency button. Braking distance: 1m at 1.25 m/s
Container dimension (W x L x H) 450 x 350 x 400 mm standard container, 450 x 350 x 300
roller container
Container Payload           15 Kg
Touch Screen                12” touch screen, 800 x 600 pixel
Software                    ROS based. Autonomous navigation with obstacle avoidance
provided with common                     interfaces of the ROS navigation stack.
Navigation accuracy Position < 40 cm, Heading < 5°

                 The Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
                 Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
The Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
Home Sensors

               Door/Window
               Sensors

               Force Sensors

               Gas/Water
               Leak
               Temperature/
               Light/Humidit
               y
               Smart Plug

                Gatway
SMART CAREGIVER SYSTEM

   L’azienda (Petaluma, California) propone una serie di sensori per il monitoraggio degli anziani in case private ed
    all’interno di strutture sanitarie. Il sistema proposto comprende sensori per il rilevamento di persone su letti, sedie
    o aree specifiche di un ambiente (tappetini sensorizzati e sensori di presenza), sistemi per il monitoraggio degli
    accessi con tecnologia RFID e sistemi di gestione degli allarmi. i materassini o tappetini sensorizzati hanno un costo
    variabile a seconda della dimensone, tra 38$ e 95$. Gli allarmi individuali per familiari o operatori socio-sanitari, in
    grado di segnalare l’alzata dal letto/sedia hanno un costo tra i 25$ (solo allarme acustico) e i 49$ (allarme
    acustico+visivo). Le stazioni di monitoraggio per strutture sanitarie sono in grado di gestire contemporaneamente
    centinaia di sensori ed il loro costo varia a seconda del numero di dispositivi collegati tra 63$ e 1200$.
TUNSTALL SUITE
   Il sistema di teleassistenza prevede diversi sensori posizionati all’interno dell’abitazione,
    collegati a un’unità centrale ad uso domestico oppure un sistema di teleassistenza Tunstall
    abilitato e monitorato 24/24 ore, 365 giorni all’anno da una centrale di ascolto, in grado di
    garantire la gestione di una emergenza. I dispositivi tunstall includono sensori di:
EMPATICA E4 (EMPATICA)
   Empatica ha sviluppato un prodotto composto da un bracciale indossabile sul
    polso e un’applicazione per smartphone integrata in un sistema di cloud
    computing. Il device misura vari parametri fisiologici e li interpreta per ricavarne
    gli stati emotivi dell’utente. L’applicazione per smartphone si presenta come un
    assistente personale del proprio benessere, fornendo consigli utili al
    miglioramento personale
Acceptability assessment
            Quantitative Data                                                      Qualitative Data
                                                                       Emotion
                                                                        Emotional status mostly neutral (95%) , and only
                                                                        positive emotion (5%) have been experienced during
                                                                        the interaction, never negative
                                                                           The interaction, even when some technical
                                                                           issues occurred, it was never perceived as
                                                                                     annoying or frustrating
                                                                       Gaze
                                                                        Good percentage of directed gaze (52%)
                                                                           Engagement and interest toward the robot

                                                                       Facial expressions and Body gestures
                                                                        Facial expressions and body gestures served also to
    Scenario1 accepted by 47 users on 50                               increase the communicative strength of messages to
    Scenario2 accepted by 26 users on 30                               the robot (smile: 3,6%; laugh: 1,5%; nodding: 1,2%;
                                                                        shaking head: 0,2%)
    Scenario1 accepted by 17 users on 20                                     Good degree of engagement during the
                                                                                           interaction
                                                                       Interaction with the robot
                                                                             Low degree of no interaction (2,7%)

Toward innovative standards to measure the acceptability of Robots,
based on user-oriented constructs
             The Robot-Era Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
             Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement num. 288899 -            WWW.ROBOT-ERA.EU
System Usability Scale (SUS)

                                                               Over75 more than Under 75 (p
Preparing the Future of Robotics in
                Europe with Citizens, Regulatory
                   Agencies and Lawmakers
                                                  The EU RoboLaw Project
                    The RoboLaw Project has received funding from the European Community's Seventh
                    Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 289092
                                              WWW.ROBOLAW.EU

                                                 Project main goal
                                                 To elaborate “Guidelines for Regulating
                                                 Robotics", containing recommendations
                                                 for the European Commission, in order to
                                                 establish a solid framework of ‘robolaw’
                                                 in Europe
Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., Pagliai, T., Morachioli, A., Acerbi, G., Trieste, L., Cavallo, F., … & Dario, P. (2016). On
Robots and Insurance (vol 8, pg 381, 2016). International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(5), 763-763.
Robot-Era Video
Pepper robot
Robots and Jobs
 •   Studies are showing the big impact of this revolution (also jointly
     with Industry 4.0);
 •   Surely, some jobs will be replaced, mainly those more
     repetitive, risky, boring, etc.;
 •   The technology evolution is moving, difficult to be stopped;
 •   Societal projections seem to clearly ask for robots;
 •   Some studies also demonstrate that technology could increase
     jobs.
•   Results show that RRTC has on net led to positive labor demand effects
    across 27 European countries over 1999-2010, indicating that labor is
    racing with the machine;
•   This is not due to limited scope for human-machine substitution, but
    rather because sizable substitution effects have been
    overcompensated by product demand and its associated
    spillovers.
Conclusions

1. ICT and Robotics are a great opportunity to innovate the healthcare sector
   and to face the most important challenges at different levels: societal,
   technological, etc.;
2. Stakeholders’ involvement is fundamental to appropriately shape the new
   service robotics solutions for healthcare;
3. Elderly people have a good perception of technologies, important is
   usability and utility;
4. Technology in medicine has already demonstrated important benefits, why
   not for care?;
5. Regulations and re-organizaton of work is important, but it should be
   performed at societal level;
6. “Robots are going to steal some jobs”, But we have to shape our best
   society.
You can also read