2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service

Page created by Darren Singh
 
CONTINUE READING
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
2020 NMSU ACES
Beef and Livestock
      Update

   Presented by the
  NMSU Cooperative
  Extension Service

     BE BOLD. Shape the Future.
     College of Agricultural, Consumer
     and Environmental Sciences
     Cooperative Extension Service
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
June 2021
                                                                                                              CS Ranch
                                                                                          Cimarron, New Mexico

MONDAY: All Things BEEF                                                          WEDNESDAY: Natural Resources
  MEAT PROCESSING PLANT TOUR                                                       SHOOTING, BOW, & TOMAHAWK
   Hands on Carcass Breakdown                                                        ACTIVITIES
  BQA CERTIFICATION                                                                FOREST and RIPARIAN TOUR
  REPRODUCTIVE MANAGEMENT                                                          NIGHT TIME WILDLIFE TOUR
   Hands on Labs
                                                                                    WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
  NUTRITION MANAGEMENT
                                                                                    CS RANCH HUNTING PROGRAM
  SELECTION PRINCIPLES

                                                                                   THURSDAY: Range Management
TUESDAY: Marketing &                                                                GRASS IDENTIFICATION
Economics                                                                             Hands on Lab
    BUILDING A RANCH BUDGET                                                        WEED CONTROL
    MARKETING STRATEGIES                                                           Hands on Lab
    NICHE MARKETING OPPORTUNITIES                                                  CALCULATING STOCKING RATES
    MOCK LIVE AUCTION                                                              RANGELAND MONITORING

                    Educating tomorrow’s leaders in ranch management, today.

                                     nmyrm.nmsu.edu

                                                About   the College: The College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences
                                                   The College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences is an engine
                                                 isfor
                                                    an economic
                                                       engine forand
                                                                  economic  and community
                                                                     community   developmentdevelopment    in New
                                                                                               in New Mexico,      Mexico,the
                                                                                                               improving    improving
                                                                                                                              lives of the
                                        nmyrm.nmsu.edu
                                                   Newlives of New
                                                         Mexicans   Mexicoacademic,
                                                                  through  through academic,    research,
                                                                                     research, and        andprograms.
                                                                                                   extension   extension programs.
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
2020 NMSU ACES BEEF AND LIVESTOCK UPDATE
                         Presented by NMSU Cooperative Extension Service

                      Organizing Committee and Editorial Board
Chair: Craig Gifford, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist, Extension Animal Sciences and Natural
Resources
Patrick Torres, Northern District Director, Cooperative Extension Service
Tom Dean, Southwest District Director, Cooperative Extension Service
Nancy Flores, Food Technology Specialist, Extension Family & Consumer Sciences
Marcy Ward, Extension Livestock Specialist, Extension Animal Sciences and Natural Resources
Greg Torell, Assistant Professor, Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business
Don Blayney, Professor, Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business
Leonard Lauriault, Superintendent Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari
Paul Gutierrez, Professor, Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business
Lena Sanchez, Graduate Student, Agriculture and Extension Education

                                    Webinar Host Counties
            Chaves, Troy Thompson         Cibola, Chase Elkins          Curry, Mason Grau
           Hidalgo, Savannah Graves      Rio Arriba, Donald Martinez Socorro, Emily Bruton

                                                   1
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IMPACT OF NATURALLY OCCURRING BACTERIAL INFECTIONS ON FEMALE FERTILITY
IN CATTLE ............................................................................................................................................. 3
ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASE MAY REDUCE COW FERTILITY ............................................................... 5
HISTONE TOXICITY AND FEEDLOT HEIFER CALVES ......................................................................... 7
COOL-SEASON PERENNIAL GRASS YIELD AND NUTRITIVE VALUE IN NEW MEXICO .................... 9
A COMPARISON OF PEARL MILLET AND SORGHUM-SUDANGRASS PASTURES DURING
THE FROST-PRONE AUTUMN FOR GROWING BEEF CATTLE IN SEMIARID REGIONS.................. 12
EFFECTS OF MATERNAL BYPASS PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTATION DURING EARLY
GESTATION ON SUBSEQUENT PROGENY PERFORMANCE IN BEEF CATTLE ............................. 14
LONG-TERM DECLINING TRENDS IN CHIHUAHUAN DESERT FORAGE PRODUCTION IN
RELATION TO PRECIPITATION AND AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ...................................................... 16
HEAT TOLERANCE OF RARAMURI CRIOLLO AND ANGUS-HEREFORD BEEF COWS
GRAZING CHIHUAHUAN DESERT PASTURES IN SUMMER.............................................................. 19
WEIGHT GAIN AND CARCASS QUALITY OF DESERT GRASS-FED RARÁMURI
CRIOLLO VS CROSSBRED STEERS................................................................................................... 22
GENETIC PROGRESS OVER TIME. A CASE STUDY OF TRENDS IN YEARLING BULL
PERFORMANCE AT THE TUCUMCARI BULL TEST STATION. ......................................................... 25
APPLICATION OF PRECISION LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT ON RANCHES IN
NEW MEXICO AND THE WESTERN US............................................................................................... 27
MOTHERING STYLE AND FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF RARAMURI CRIOLLO AND
ANGUS-HEREFORD BEEF COWS GRAZING CHIHUAHUAN DESERT PASTURES IN SUMMER ..... 30
NEW MEXICO’S STATE MEAT INSPECTION OPPORTUNITIES ......................................................... 33
NEW MEXICO BULL MANAGEMENT SURVEY UPDATE .................................................................... 36
GRASS-FED BEEF AS AN OPTION FOR NEW MEXICO PRODUCERS .............................................. 38
IDENTIFYING AND PREDICTING PARTURITION OF SHEEP USING A TRI-AXIAL
ACCELEROMETER....................................................................................................................................43
CHEMOKINE LIGAND 12 (CXCL12) HELPS GOVERN PLACENTAL HOMEOSTASIS BY SERVING
AS A CRITICAL UPSTREAM MEDIATOR OF PLACENTAL VASCULARIZATION IN SHEEP. ........... 45

                                                                                 2
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
Impact of naturally occurring bacterial infections on female fertility in cattle 1

        K.K. Forrest*, V.V. Flores*, C.B. Shuster† C.A. Gifford‖, J.A. Hernandez Gifford*

     *Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
    88003 ‖Extension Animal Sciences and Natural Resources, New Mexico State University, Las
      Cruces, NM 88003 †Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
                                            88003

Keywords:       disease,   estrogen,     fertility,       lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been shown to
oocyte                                                    negatively impact fertility by disrupting
                                                          ovarian E2 production (Magata et al., 2014)
Introduction                                              and compromising oocyte development
        The reproductive efficiency of a herd             (Zhao et al., 2017).
is an essential component for a beef cattle                      Therefore,      the      experiments
operation to be productive and sustainable.               presented      herein   were    aimed      at
Reproductive failure is one of the most                   investigating the impact of naturally
significant contributing factors to a female              occurring infection and consequent follicular
leaving the herd. Although reproductive                   LPS accumulation on follicular E2 production
success for cattle producers culminates with              and oocyte development in vitro.
uterine fetal development and ends with the
delivery of a healthy calf, it all starts with            Materials and Methods
development of the oocyte or egg, inside an                       Ovary pairs of non-pregnant cows
ovarian follicle.                                         and heifers were collected from a local
The unique follicular microenvironment                    slaughterhouse. Oocytes (n = 133) and
surrounding the oocyte is essential for its               follicular fluid were collected from small
developmental quality. Circulating estrogen               developing follicles and combined for each
(E2) produced by ovarian follicles is critical to         ovary pair. Oocytes were matured in vitro
female fertility as it contributes to numerous            and incubated with fluorescent stains for
physiological          events         regulating          visualization of oocyte quality using confocal
reproduction, including oocyte development                microscopy. Follicular fluid was analyzed for
(Wu et al., 1992). Previous studies have                  concentrations of E2 and LPS.
shown cattle are largely susceptible to a
wide range of pathologies associated with                 Results and Discussion
Gram-negative bacteria that may manifest in                     A variety of phenotypes were
clinical or subclinical infections. Clinical              evaluated and demonstrated in the oocytes
infections often present apparent and visible
symptoms, whereas subclinical infections
appear asymptomatic and therefore, may go
unnoticed.        Bacterial      release       of

1
 Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the NM Agric. Exp. Sta. Las Cruces, NM and National Science
Foundation under grant #MCB1917983 to C.B.S.

                                                      3
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
collected from             slaughterhouse             ovaries       infections may be an underestimated factor
 (Figure 1).                                                         contributing to compromised fertility, as its
                                                                     been demonstrated that cows with naturally
                                                                     occurring subclinical mastitis had reduced
                                                                     follicular E2 concentrations, compared to
                                                                     uninfected animals and animals that
                                                                     previously experienced a clinical event
                                                                     (Lavon et al., 2011).
                                                                     Implications
                                                                            Understanding how LPS impacts E 2
                                                                     production at the cellular level and
                                                                     influences oocyte development, may explain
Figure 1. Representative images of cattle oocytes
                                                                     an unappreciated factor contributing to
matured in vitro. Oocytes were cultured in maturation                impaired     female      fertility. Additional
media for 21 h and stained for visualization of the membrane         investigation into this mechanism may also
(red), spindles (cyan), and DNA (white). (A) and (B) are fully
mature (12%, normal). (C) and (D) did not fully mature (46%,
                                                                     help with understanding how long females
delayed abnormal). (E) and (F) demonstrated irregular                who experience an infection will be
developmental characteristics (42%, abnormal).                       negatively impacted, contributing to more
                                                                     insight on culling decisions for cattle
 Of the total oocytes collected, 12%                                 producers.
 successfully matured (Fig. 1 A, B), 46%
 failed to complete the entire maturation                            References
 process (Fig. 1C, D), and the remaining                                     Lavon, Y., G. Leitner, E. Klipper, U.
 oocytes demonstrated various abnormal                               Moallem, R. Meidan, and D. Wolfenson.
 morphological       characteristics     during                      2011. Subclinical, chronic intramammary
 maturation (Fig. 1E, F). Impaired oocyte                            infection lowers steroid concentrations and
 development       compromises       successful                      gene expression in bovine preovulatory
 fertilization and subsequent embryonic                              follicles. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 40:98-
 development, negatively impacting overall                           109.doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2010.09.004.
 fertility. The oocytes inability to mature                                  Magata, F., M. Horiuchi, R.
 undermines its developmental competency.                            Echizenya, R. Miura, S. Chiba, M. Matsui, A.
 This results in an open female and creates a                        Miyamoto, Y. Kobayashi, and T. Shimizu.
 loss of productivity and profitability for the                      2014. Lipopolysaccharide in ovarian
 producer.                                                           follicular fluid influences the steroid
         Varying concentrations of LPS was                           production in large follicles of dairy cows.
 detected in the follicular fluid collected from                     Anim.        Reprod.      Sci.     144:6-13.
 slaughterhouse ovaries. No treatment was                            doi:10.1016./j.anireprosci.2013.11.005.
 implemented during maturation of the                                        Wu, T. C., L. Wang, and Y. J. Wan.
 oocytes used in this current study, indicating                      1992. Expression of estrogen receptor gene
 these animals may have experienced                                  in mouse oocyte and during embryogenesis.
 infection prior to culling. However, follicular                     Mol.       Reprod.     Dev.      33:407-412.
 E2 concentrations did not differ between the                        doi:10.1002/mrd.1080330406.
 oocyte groups (P = 0.70). Subacute

                                                                 4
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
Asymptomatic disease may reduce cow fertility1

 E.F. Bruton*, B.H. Aloqaily§, C.A. Gifford‡, K.K. Forrest§, C.A. Löest§, J. C. Wenzel‡, and
                                 J. A. Hernandez Gifford§
    *Cooperative Extension Service, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003
   ‡
     Extension Animal Sciences and Natural Resources, New Mexico State University, Las
                                     Cruces, NM 88003
 §
  Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
                                           88003
     1
      Research supported by N.M. Agriculture Experiment Station, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Introduction                                           Key    words:       asymptomatic,   disease,
                                                       estrogen, fertility
        Success of a given cow-calf operation
relies heavily on the fertility and productivity       Materials and Methods
of the females within the herd. One major
                                                                All procedures were approved by the
driver of female fertility is estrogen (E2), a
                                                       New Mexico State University Institutional
hormone produced by ovarian follicles,
                                                       Animal Care and Use Committee.
necessary for many reproductive events
                                                                Fourteen, Angus heifers were
(Simpson et al., 2005).
                                                       stratified by body weight into saline treated
        Several diseases affecting cattle can
                                                       control (CON; n = 7) or LPS treated (n = 7)
negatively influence fertility (Sheldon and
                                                       groups. All animals were previously group
Dobson, 2003). In some diseases, a
                                                       housed for several months and cyclicity was
bacterial toxin called lipopolysaccharide
                                                       confirmed. Heifers were synchronized for
(LPS) is released. Previous studies have
                                                       estrus. Saline or LPS was administered on
demonstrated changes in E2 production in
                                                       days 2, 5, and 8 of the synchronization
response to LPS (Magata et al., 2014).
                                                       protocol. This treatment regime was aimed
These changes in E2 brought on by LPS can
                                                       at      producing     a   long-lasting,   but
negatively affect fertility which is problematic
                                                       asymptomatic immune response. Rectal
due to reproductive failure being a leading
                                                       temperatures were collected following each
cause of cow culling.
                                                       treatment to confirm immune response.
        Bacterial infectionscan occur as
                                                                Blood samples were taken every 8
acute infections with visible symptoms or
                                                       hours beginning on day 7, a time aimed at
subacute with asymptomatic presentations.
                                                       maximal E2 production prior to ovulation.
Perturbed fertility due to asymptomatic
                                                       Follicular fluid was collected from each
disease may go undetected until a
                                                       animal’s ovaries. Blood and follicular fluid
noticeable problem arises. Therefore,
                                                       was analyzed for concentrations of E2.
understanding the impacts of subclinical
infection on fertility is beneficial. This study
aimed to measure E2 production in animals
with asymptomatic immune responses.

                                                   5
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
Results and Discussion                                fertility in cow-calf settings. Cattle in New
        Heifers treated with LPS showed
increases in rectal temperatures following
their first LPS treatment with no other
outward signs of disease. This confirmed
induction of an asymptomatic immune
response.
        Blood serum E2 concentrations did
not differ significantly at any time point
(Figure 1). However, there was a 2-fold
decrease in circulating E2 concentration 50             Figure 2. Follicular fluid estrogen (E2)
hours into blood collections in LPS treated             concentration in heifers administered
animals. This implies a change in E2 that               saline (CON) or lipopolysaccharide
could be deleterious to fertility at later time         (LPS)
points.                                               Mexico are susceptible to undetected
                                                      infections,      reducing       reproductive
                                                      performance. It is important to monitor herd
                                                      health and reproduction through pregnancy
                                                      checking, proper vaccination, and immune
                                                      system management.
                                                      References
                                                      Magata. F., M. Horiuchi, R. Echizenya, R.
                                                      Miura, S. Chiba, M. Matsui, A. Miyamoto, Y.
                                                      Kobayashi, and T. Schimizu. 2014.
                                                      Lipopolysaccharide in ovarian follicular fluid
    Figure 1. Serum estrogen (E2)
                                                      influences the steroid production in large
    concentration in heifers administered
    saline (CON) or lipopolysaccharide                follicles of dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci.
    (LPS).                                            144:6-13.
        Surprisingly, E2 concentrations within        doi:10.1016/j/anireprosci.2013.11.005
follicular fluid were significantly greater in        Sheldon, I. M., and H. Dobson. 2003.
LPS treated animals when compared to                  Reproductive challenges facing the cattle
saline treated controls (Figure 2), which             industry at the beginning of the 21st century.
demonstrates an obvious change in E2 with             Reproduction 61:1-13.
subclinical levels of LPS.
        This study demonstrated a clear               Simpson, E. R., M. Misso, K. N. Hewitt, R. A.
modulation of ovarian E2 production in                Hill, W. C. Boon, M. E. Jones, A. Kovacic, J.
response to subclinical LPS injection. These          Zhou, and C. D. Clyne. 2005. Estrogen-the
changes in E2 could be detrimental to female          good, the bad, and the unexpected. Endocr.
                                                      Rev. 26:322-330. doi:10.1210/er.2004-002

                                                  6
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
Histone toxicity and feedlot heifer calves
              V. V. Flores , B. K. Wilson ‡, C. A. Gifford†, and J. A. Hernandez Gifford*
                          *

 *
     Department of Range and Animal Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM
                                            88001
        ‡
         Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
      †
       Extension Animal Sciences and Natural Resources, New Mexico State University, Las
                                     Cruces, NM 88003
Introduction                                           feedlot arrival and subsequent respiratory
                                                       disease outcome in heifers.
       Bovine respiratory disease (BRD)
remains the costliest factor affecting the U.S.               Key     words:       cattle,     histone,
beef industry. Although there have been                respiratory disease, toxicity
advances in vaccines and increased
                                                       Materials and Methods
adoption rates, BRD cases amongst calves
entering feedlots continue to rise.                          Serum was collected from heifer
                                                       calves (n=117; BW +/- 483 lbs.) at
        Stress on calves is particularly high
                                                       processing upon entering the feedlot.
just prior to and up until entering feedlots.
This leads to many calves dying or                             Heifer calves were retrospectively
contracting BRD shortly after arrival. Despite         assigned to groups consisting of those never
proper vaccination and weaning protocols,              needing treatment for BRD and remaining
some NM producers still report problems                alive throughout the feeding period (0T;
with BRD after weaning.                                n=109) or calves that died within 1 wk of
                                                       arrival (D; n=8). Calf serum collected at initial
         Histones are proteins found in the
                                                       processing was tested using a histone
nucleus of cells that condense DNA. When
                                                       toxicity assay.
cells are damaged histones are released
and cause damage to surrounding tissue.                        Briefly, bovine kidney cells were
One hallmark of BRD is massive lung tissue             cultured in duplicate in 96-well plates and
damage. In mice and humans, extracellular              exposed to 0 (diH2O; control) or 50 μg/mL of
histones have been implicated in respiratory           total histones with 1% calf serum for 18 h.
distress syndrome (Xu et al., 2009; Abrams             Protective capacity was estimated by
et al., 2013). Additionally, calves that have a        measuring the viability of cells incubated
severe case of bovine respiratory disease              with and without histones. Decreased
have an impaired capacity to protect against           fluorescence correlated to lower cell viability.
histone toxicity (Matera et al., 2015).
       However, Matera et al. (2015) utilized
high risk bull calves that were surgically
castrated upon arrival. It is possible that
castration influenced the severity of
respiratory disease. Little is known regarding
histone toxicity in heifer or steer calves
entering the feedlot. The current experiment
evaluated susceptibility to histone toxicity at

                                                  7
2020 NMSU ACES Beef and Livestock Update - Presented by the NMSU Cooperative Extension Service
week after feedlot arrival. Heifers who died
                                                       within the first week had a decreased
Results and Discussion
                                                       capacity to protect against histone toxicity
Calves that entered the feedlot and who                which is similar to bull calves who suffered
never received treatment for BRD and                   severe cases of BRD (Matera et al., 2015). It
remained alive throughout the feeding period           is important to note that in both studies (our
were significantly (P < 0.001) more                    study and that of Matera et al., 2015),
protective against histone toxicity compared           samples were collected at arrival and prior to
to those that died within 1 wk of arrival as           any clinical symptoms.       Future studies
indicated by a greater serum fluorescence              will continue to develop this technology to
(Figure 1).                                            predict which calves may suffer severe or
                                                       lethal cases of BRD. Additionally,
                                                       determining the mechanism responsible for
                                                       protecting against histone toxicity may allow
                                                       for the development of improved BRD
                                                       treatments or genetic selection against
                                                       animals that are highly susceptible to histone
                                                       toxicity and severe cases of BRD.
                                                       References

Figure 1. Serum samples collected from heifer
                                                       Abrams S. T., Zhang N., Manson J., Liu T.,
calves at initial processing was used in histone       Dart C., Florence B., Wang S. S., Brohi K.,
toxicity assay. Fluorescent values for calves          Kipar A., Yu W., Wang G., and Toh C. H.
that were never treated for BRD and remained           2013. Circulating histones are mediators of
alive (0T) compared to those that died within          trauma-associated lung injury. Am. J.
one week of arrival (D) .
                                                       Respir. Crit. Care Med. 187:160-169.
       Visual       appraisal    of      cells
                                                       doi:10.1164/rccm.201206-1037OC
demonstrated       the   toxic   effects    of
extracellular histones in the presence of 0T           Matera J. A., Wilson B. K., Hernandez
serum (protective) and D serum (non-                   Gifford J. A., Step D. L., Krehbiel C. R., and
protective) (Figure 2).                                C.A. Gifford. 2015. Cattle with increased
                                                       severity of bovine respiratory disease
                                                       complex exhibit decreased capacity to
                                                       protect against histone cytotoxicity. J. Anim.
                                                       Sci. 93:1841-1849. doi:10.2527/jas.2014-
                                                       8334
                                                       Xu J, Zhang X, Pelayo R., Monestier M.,
Figure 2. Visual appraisal of bovine kidney            Ammollo C. T., Semeraro F., Taylor F. B.,
cells incubated with histones and calf serum
from 0T (left) and D (right) animals.
                                                       Esmon N. L., Lupu F., and Esmon C. T.
                                                       2009. Extracellular histones are major
      Few heifers required         multiple            mediators of death in sepsis. Nat. Med.
treatments for BRD, but several heifers                15:1318-1321. doi:10.1038/nm.2053
experienced acute mortality within the first

                                                   8
Cool-season perennial grass yield and nutritive value in New Mexico

                      M.A. Marsalis†, M. Place†, D. Price†, and C. Havlik†
     †
      New Mexico State University, Agricultural Science Center at Los Lunas, NM 87031

Keywords: hay, nutritive value, orchardgrass, pasture, tall fescue, yield

Introduction:                                       + urea), and 52 lb/ac P2O5 (11-52-0).
                                                    Additional 2018 fertilizer applications (lb/ac)
Cool-season perennial grasses are grown
                                                    occurred on: June 11 (133# N); July 10
throughout New Mexico for pasture and hay
                                                    (95# N); Aug. 15 (95# N); and Sept. 21 (48#
operations. Little is known about variety
                                                    N, 52# P2O5, 47# K2O, 19# S). First
performance of tall fescue and
                                                    ‘established’ season cuts began on May 8,
orchardgrass, two of the most popular
                                                    2018, for tall fescue. Orchardgrass harvests
grasses in New Mexico. New varieties of
                                                    began on May 31, 2018. Additional 2018
tall fescue have been released in recent
                                                    harvests for both tall fescue and
years that contain ‘novel’ or ‘friendly’
                                                    orchardgrass occurred on: May 31, Jul. 2,
endophytes that give the plant persistence,
                                                    Aug. 8, Sept. 11, and Nov. 6. Year 2
while not harming livestock. Testing of
                                                    (2019): Fertilizer was applied on the
these grass varieties is necessary in New
                                                    following dates: Apr. 2 (22 # N/ac; 104 #
Mexico in order to make reliable
                                                    P2O5/ac), June 6 (76 # N/ac), July 15 (69 #
recommendations to growers in the variable
                                                    N/ac), and Sept. 10 (76 #N/ac). Harvest
climate zones across the state. The NMSU
                                                    dates were: May 24, July 8, Aug. 28, and
Los Lunas Agricultural Science Center
                                                    Oct. 22, 2019. Irrigations (approx. 1/month)
(ASC) tests varieties that have potential in
                                                    ran from March to October in both years.
the flood-irrigated systems in north-central
New Mexico, and higher elevations of                Freshly mowed plant material was raked
southern New Mexico.                                onto a tarp and weighed. A sub-sample of
Materials and Methods:                              each plot was collected for dry matter
                                                    determination and nutritive value analysis.
On Sept. 13, 2017, 14 tall fescue and 12            Samples were dried using a forced-air oven
orchardgrass varieties were planted on a            at 125⁰F for 72 hours. Dried samples were
Belen loam soil at the Los Lunas ASC, at            ground to pass a 1-mm sieve and were
25 lbs seed/acre. Final measured,                   submitted to a forage-testing laboratory.
individual plot dimension was 68 ft2.
                                                    Results and Discussion
Irrigations began on Sept. 14, 2017,
immediately after planting, followed by a           Total seasonal yields (dry tons/ac) and
second establishment irrigation on Sept. 20.        nutritive value (crude protein, in vitro true
The field received repeated rains after this        dry matter digestibility, and digestible
date sufficient to complete stand                   energy) for 2018-2019 of tall fescue and
emergence. Subsequent 2017 irrigations              orchardgrass varieties are presented in
were on Oct. 20 and Nov. 21.                        Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Tall fescue
Year 1 (2018): On Mar. 19, 2018, the entire         performed considerably better than
                                                    orchardgrass with respect to yield and
field was fertilized with 52 lb/ac N (11-52-0

                                                9
persistence. In general, orchardgrass                                                                     Irrigated pasture and hay producers in New
nutritive value was higher than tall fescue.                                                              Mexico have multiple options for variety
Protein and energy values for both species                                                                selection of tall fescue and orchardgrass,
were considered excellent for hay or                                                                      both of which have potential for excellent
pasture. Nutritive value was more affected                                                                yields and nutritive value for multiple
by harvest date (cut) than by individual                                                                  classes of livestock. Time of year and plant
variety differences.                                                                                      maturity affect quality more than variety;
                                                                                                          and digestibility and energy tend to
                                                                                                          increase later in the season.
Summary and New Mexico Impact

Table 1. 2018-2019 yields and nutritive value of tall fescue varieties and cuts at Los Lunas, NM.
                                                                                                                                                           2-Year
Results - All Cuts                                                               2018                                        2019                        Average
                                                                   Total                                        Total                                       Total
Brand/Company           Hybrid/Variety                         Dry Matter    Crude Digestible               Dry Matter    Crude Digestible              Dry Matter
Name                    Name                      Endophyte†        Yield   Protein     Energy IVTDMD††          Yield   Protein    Energy    IVTDMD†        Yield
                                                                  tons/ac        %      Mcal/lb      %         tons/ac        %     Mcal/lb        %       tons/ac

Pennington Seed         Max Q II - Texoma           Novel            10.1      17.5      0.991     83.5            6.5      11.6     1.018       81.4          8.3
El Air                  KY 31                        E+              10.1      18.7      0.996     83.3            6.5      12.7     0.999       81.7          8.3
Mt. View Seeds          Teton 2                      E-              10.2      18.2      0.992     82.3            6.2      12.9     1.021       81.6          8.2
Old Mill                Brutus                     Low E+            10.1      17.7      0.994     82.1            6.3      12.2     0.991       80.1          8.2
DLF Seeds               Martin 2                     E-              10.2      18.9      1.010     82.9            6.2      13.1     1.022       81.5          8.2
C&C/Barenbrug           Drover                       E-               9.8      17.6      0.995     82.1            6.3      12.7     1.004       79.8          8.0
DLF Seeds               Martin 2 (Protek)           Novel             9.9      17.0      0.999     82.1            6.1      12.5     1.019       81.1          8.0
Barenbrug/C&C           BarOptima Plus E34          Novel             9.7      19.5      1.010     84.0            6.1      13.7     1.024       82.0          7.9
DLF Seeds               Tower (Protek)              Novel             9.5      17.4      0.990     82.9            6.3      12.4     1.017       81.6          7.9
Mt. View Seeds          Estancia                    Novel             9.5      16.7      0.995     83.6            6.2      12.2     0.997       81.2          7.9
El Air / Old Mill       Fawn                         E-               9.5      17.8      1.000     82.6            6.1      12.3     1.014       80.2          7.8
Univ of Kentucky        Lacefield Max Q II          Novel             9.5      18.8      1.003     83.6            6.0      12.8     1.022       82.1          7.8
Barenbrug/C&C           Bar FAF 131                  E-               8.5      16.9      1.011     83.3            5.8      12.8     1.043       81.6          7.2
Pennington Seed         Max Q - Jesup               Novel             8.6      17.4      1.001     83.2            5.7      12.7     1.026       82.1          7.2
Average                                                               9.7      17.9      0.999     83.0            6.2      12.6     1.015       81.3          7.9

Cut*                    1                                             1.5      18.1      0.980     82.5            2.3       8.5     1.010       76.6
                        2                                             0.8      17.5      0.947     81.8            1.7      12.2     0.959       79.9
                        3                                             1.8      19.8      0.980     82.6            1.5      14.1     1.023       81.4
                        4                                             2.3      17.3      0.975     81.1            0.8      15.7     1.069       87.1
                        5                                             1.6      18.9      0.981     82.7              .         .          .         .
                        6                                             1.7      15.6      1.133     87.0              .         .          .         .

Least Significant Difference P > 0.05 (Variety)                       0.7       0.8      0.009      0.6            NS        NS        NS         1.0          0.6
Least Significant Difference P > 0.05 (Cut)                           0.2       0.5      0.007      0.4            0.5       0.9     0.016        0.7
†E+ = toxic endophyte present; E- = no endophyte present; Novel = non-harmful endophyte present
††IVTDMD = In vitro true dry matter digestibility
*Average of all varieties per cutting.

                                                                                                    10
Table 2. 2018-2019 yields and nutritive value of orchardgrass varieties and cuts at Los Lunas, NM.
                                                                                                                                                         2-Year
Results - All Cuts                                                  2018                                                  2019                         Average
                                                      Total                                                 Total                                         Total
Brand/Company           Hybrid/Variety            Dry Matter    Crude    Digestible                     Dry Matter    Crude    Digestible             Dry Matter
Name                    Name                           Yield   Protein     Energy     IVTDMD†                Yield   Protein     Energy     IVTDMD†        Yield
                                                     tons/ac        %       Mcal/lb        %               tons/ac        %       Mcal/lb        %       tons/ac

Granite Seed Co.        Persist                          4.2      18.6       1.107       83.5                  5.3      15.2       1.046       80.1          4.7
Great Basin Seed        Paiute                           4.1      18.4       1.109       83.3                  5.0      15.6       1.048       80.7          4.5
Great Basin Seed        Potomac                          4.0      18.9       1.125       84.2                  4.9      16.3       1.064       82.3          4.5
Seed World              Tekapo                           3.7      18.1       1.102       83.2                  5.1      14.6       1.042       79.9          4.4
Allied Seed             FSG 5060G                        3.6      19.1       1.123       84.3                  5.0      16.1       1.046       81.8          4.3
Old Mill                Dawn                             3.6      19.3       1.119       84.2                  5.0      15.6       1.050       81.2          4.3
El Air                  Quick Draw                       3.8      19.3       1.136       84.2                  4.7      15.7       1.060       81.8          4.2
Great Basin Seed        Hallmark                         3.5      19.0       1.114       83.7                  4.6      15.7       1.072       82.1          4.1
American Seed Co.       Pennlate                         3.5      19.1       1.084       84.2                  4.3      15.7       1.045       82.1          3.9
Barenbrug/C&C           Intensiv                         3.3      18.8       1.105       84.8                  4.0      15.7       1.053       82.3          3.7
Barenbrug/C&C           Baraula                          3.1      19.0       1.095       84.3                  4.3      15.9       1.032       81.8          3.7
Great Basin Seed        Latar*                           5.7      17.9       1.057       82.9                  4.6      15.6       1.042       81.7   ……..
Average                                                  3.8      18.8       1.106       83.9                  4.7      15.6       1.050       81.5          4.2

Cut**                   1                                0.8      12.6       1.074       81.9                  3.2      10.6       0.983       77.6
                        2                                0.6      20.2       1.103       83.6                  1.2      13.9       1.013       80.1
                        3                                0.6      19.4       1.039       83.6                  0.2      16.3       1.122       81.7
                        4                                0.6      21.2       1.085       80.6                  0.1      21.7       1.082       86.5
                        5                                1.1      20.5       1.230       89.8                    .         .            .         .

Least Significant Difference P > 0.05 (Variety)          NS        0.9       0.013        0.6                  0.5       NS           NS        0.9          0.5
Least Significant Difference P > 0.05 (Cut)              0.2       0.8       0.008        0.5                  0.3       1.3       0.019        0.8
†IVTDMD = In vitro true dry matter digestibility
*Latar orchardgrass was mixed with annual ryegrass at seeding which dominated the stand in year 2018.
**Average of all varieties per cutting.

                                                                                                11
Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural                                                          BE BOLD. Shape the Future.
                                                                               College of Agricultural, Consumer

Science Center at Tucumcari                                                         and Environmental Sciences

                                                T
                                                          he Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari (REKASCT)
                                                          is known for conducting locally driven, globally relevant research related
                                                          to crop (including forages) and livestock production under irrigated and
                                                 dryland conditions. These efforts focus on: improving the quality, safety, and
                                                 reliability of food and fiber products, which enhances agricultural profitability;
                                                 stimulating economic development using natural resources; sustaining
                                                 the environment and protecting natural resources with sound practices, and
                                                 improving the quality of life for the people of New Mexico.

                                                 FUTURE GOALS
                                                  ƒ Replace, upgrade, and/or construct buildings and facilities to meet the
                                                    demands of ongoing and increasing programs.

                                                  ƒ Evaluate the cropping potential and environmental impacts of using
                                                    treated municipal wastewater for agricultural irrigation.

                                                  ƒ Address rangeland health issues in northeastern/east-central New Mexico.

                                                  ƒ Discover horticultural crop options for small farms with few available
                                                    resources, particularly in regard to water.

   Only center reusing treated municipal
   water for irrigation, providing a year
   round source for irrigated research.

   Capacity to conduct both crop and
   livestock research.

   Over 30 external partnerships/
   collaborators, including five
   international connections

                                                                                                                   (continued on back)

                          The College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences is an engine for economic and community
                          development in New Mexico, improving the lives of New Mexicans through academic, research, and Extension
                          programs. New Mexico State University is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer and educator.
                                                  NMSU and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.
2019 IMPACTS
    Beef herd improvements have been made for more than half a century due to feed efficiency
    testing. This has led to an estimated value exceeding $800,000 annually to New Mexico’s
    beef cattle industry.

    Alfalfa variety testing potentially returns $46 million to New Mexico’s growers. Differences
    between the highest- and lowest-yielding varieties in irrigated alfalfa tests statewide ranged
    from 1.11 to 1.61 tons per acre in 2019. If sold as hay, this translates to a potential difference in
    returns of $273 to $396 per acre due to variety.

    Strip-tillage for corn production has environmental and economic benefits in New Mexico.
    Corn constitutes about 17% of New Mexico’s irrigated crop area. The strip tillage yield
    advantage in corn in New Mexico is estimated to be $12.9 million over conventional
    tillage in addition to energy savings and the advantages of controlling soil erosion and
    improving water- and nutrient-use efficiency.

    Manure application costs can be cut by up to 60% by applying manure only in the strip-till
    zone. Additionally, three years after a single 10 tons /A manure application, with or without
    incorporation, grain sorghum biomass continues to be greater by no-till planting into the
    original strip-till zone.

    ONGOING RESEARCH
    Reviewing results of applying of a multi-nutrient source to potassium-deficient soils for
    boosting alfalfa yield and nutrient value.

    Continuing to test bulls and heifers for improved beef herd genetics. This testing has led to an
    estimated value of $800,000 annually to New Mexico’s beef cattle industry.

    Evaluating conditions to improve yield and quality for guar producers. Growing guar
    domestically would reduce production and importing costs drastically.

    Continuing the search for summer annual legumes to grow with summer annual cereal forages
    and management practices to improve forage yield and nutritive value.

Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari
New Mexico State University
6502 Quay Rd. AM 5, Tucumcari, NM 88401
Phone: 575-461-1620
Email: tucumcar@nmsu.edu
Web: tucumcarisc.nmsu.edu
New Mexico State University Agricultural Experiment Station
A comparison of pearl millet and sorghum-sudangrass pastures during the frost-prone
                    autumn for growing beef cattle in semiarid regions 2
               Leonard M. Lauriault*, Leah Schmitz†, and Eric J. Scholljegerdes†
*
 New Mexico State University, Rex E. Kirksey Agricultural Science Center at Tucumcari, NM
 88401
†
 New Mexico State University, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Las Cruces, NM
 88003
Keywords: Growing cattle; Pearl millet; Prussic acid toxicity; Sorghum-sudangrass;
Summer/autumn pastures
Introduction                                                 guidelines set by the New Mexico State
                                                             University Institutional Animal Care and
Warm-season annual grass forages such
                                                             Use Committee.
as sorghums [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench
and S. bicolor ✕ S. sudanense (Piper)                        Sorghum-sudangrass (SS) pasture was
Stapf.] and pearl millet [Pennisetum                         compared to pearl millet (PM) with two
glaucum (L.) R. Br.] are well-adapted to                     replicates in each of 2013 and 2014 to
semiarid regions (Machicek et al., 2019),                    determine their relative effect (forage) on
such as New Mexico, for pastures with                        growth of growing beef cattle during late
excellent and near equal animal                              summer and autumn. Pastures were
performance during summer (Fontaneli et                      planted (35 and 20 lb seed/ac for SS and
al., 2001). New Mexico is prone to                           PM, respectively) in June each year and
unpredictable early frosts beginning in                      sprinkler-irrigated with treated municipal
September. Sorghum forages produce toxic                     wastewater (Class 1B) throughout the pre-
levels of Prussic acid throughout the plant                  grazing and grazing periods. Each year
when stressed, including frost and freeze                    labelled pre- and post-emergence
damage, while pearl millet does not (Hanna                   herbicides were used to control weeds and
and Torres-Cardona, 2001). However, little                   fertilizer was applied based on soil test
is known about the use of either forage                      recommendations.
during the frost prone-autumns of New                        Pastures (approximately 4.5 acres each)
Mexico. This study aimed at comparing                        had three 16 ft2 exclosures uniformly
sorghum-sudangrass and pearl millet on
                                                             distributed prior to grazing. Six pregnant
performance of growing beef cattle during
                                                             beef (Bos taurus L.) heifers were assigned
the late summer and autumn seasons.
Method(s)                                                     to each pasture by initial body weight (644
                                                             ± 59 lb in 2013 and 730 ± 92 lb in 2014) to
All animal handling and experimental
                                                             have similar stocking densities. Grazing
procedures we in accordance with
                                                             was initiated on August 13, 2013, and

The study was funded by state and federal funds appropriated to the Agricultural Experiment Station at New
1

Mexico State University.
    Mention of a product by name does not constitute endorsement.
    Appreciation is expressed to Jason Box, Patricia Cooksey, Shane Jennings, Jared Jennings and Hubert Roberts
    for secretarial and technical support.

                                                        12
September 10, 2014. Minerals (Hi-Pro Beef            Initial and final forage availability of SS was
Range Mineral) were supplied ad libitum in           greater than PM, but the rate of subsequent
each pasture. Prior to grazing and every 28          growth of the forages and removal by the
days (grazing period), cattle were held off-         animals was consistent across pasture
feed, but with water and weighed. On those           types and availability was never limiting.
dates, standing forage was harvested near            Forage type did not influence the calving
each exclosure leaving a 2-inch stubble              percentage of the heifers. Average daily
using a self-propelled forage plot harvester         gains of growing cattle grazing pearl millet
equipped with a weighing system. A                   was greater in one year, likely due to greater
subsample of each harvested sample was               nutritive value, but no different from SS on
collected and dried in a forced-air oven at          average across years. Additionally, season-
140°F for 48 hours to determine dry matter           long gains/acre differed between forages
percentage and yield. Grazing of SS                  with PM having greater gains than SS (359
pastures ended on October 22, 2013, and              vs. 285 lb/acre for PM and SS, respectively,
November 11, 2014, due to anticipated                with a >98% likelihood that those numbers
hard freeze or frost, which did occur                are different). This was largely due to the
overnight or the following day. Grazing              longer grazing season afforded by PM after
ceased on the PM pasture on November 5,              the freeze (average of 19 additional days on
2013, and December 4, 2014, which were               pasture for PM vs. SS). That increase in gain
the next scheduled weigh days each year              came at nearly equal costs for establishment
and because it was anticipated that PM               and management of the pastures (only seed
forage would soon become limiting. Heifers           cost differences between the species) and
were weighed when removed from test                  animals, thereby, adding value to the
pastures and transferred to graze a non-             system.
experimental pasture. Data were
                                                     Summary
statistically analyzed to compare pasture
type (SS or PM), measurement period,                 New Mexico cattle growers can use pearl
year, and their interactions requiring a 95%         millet to avoid the danger of Prussic acid
confidence to accept a difference as being           poisoning caused by grazing sorghum
significant.                                         forages during the frost-prone autumn
                                                     period
Results
References                                           Development and Use. CRC Press, Boca
                                                     Raton, LA. p. 193-200,
Fontanelli, R. S., L. E. Sollenberger, and C.
                                                     doi:10.1201/9781420038781.
R. Staples. 2001. Yield, yield distribution,
and nutritive value of intensively managed           Machicek, J. A., B. C. Blaser, M.
warm-season annual grasses. Agron. J.                Darapuneni, and M. B. Rhoades. 2019.
93:1257-1262.                                        Harvesting regimes affect brown midrib
                                                     sorghum-sudangrass and brown midrib
Hanna, W. W., and S. Torres-Cardona.
                                                     pearl millet forage production and quality.
2001. Pennisetums and Sorghums in an
Integrated Feeding System in the Tropics.            Agron. 9, 416. doi:10.3390/agronomy90804
In: W.D. Pitman and A. Sotomayor-Rios,
editors, Tropical Forage Plants:

                                                13
Effects of maternal bypass protein supplementation during early gestation on
                      subsequent progeny performance in beef cattle
        A. Selman, L. Lemke, J. Woodbury, J. Beard, S. Rosasco, E. Scholljegerdes, and A.
                                           Summers
    New Mexico State University, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Las Cruces, NM
                                            88003
Key words:3 Fetal programming, gestation,                    levels of ruminally undegradable protein
supplementation, by-pass protein, growth                     during early gestation
                   Introduction                              Materials and Methods
Calf development and productivity is crucial                 All procedures were conducted in
to a successful cattle operation. Improper                   accordance with an approved NMSU
nutrition during pregnancy can have long-                    Institutional Animal and Care Committee
term effects on subsequent progeny in                        protocol. Over two years, twenty-eight
humans, which is called fetal programming                    cows were randomly assigned to one of
(Barker et al., 1993). Fetal programming is                  three feeding treatments fed during early
any alteration to the dam whether it be                      gestation. The treatments were: 1) a basal
genetic, environmental, or dietetic that has                 diet formulated to meet or exceed
a direct effect on progeny performance and                   requirements for early gestation (CON); 2)
survival (Funston et. al, 2010). In previous                 a basal diet plus a protein supplement
studies, supplemental protein that resists                   consisting of 36% of the protein being by-
degradation in the rumen (known as                           pass (LRUP); and 3) a basal diet plus a
ruminally undegradable protein or by-pass                    protein supplement consisting of 50% of
protein) and is available at the small                       protein being by-pass (HRUP). Cows were
intestine can positively affect progeny body                 individually fed diets and supplements
weight, feed efficiency, and reproductive                    during the first trimester of pregnancy.
success (Funston et. al, 2010).                              After which, all were managed in a dry-lot
                                                             and fed a common diet.
However, little research is available that
demonstrates this response when fed                           Cows, calved and progeny were weaned at
during early gestation when fetal organs are                 7 months of age. At approximately 10
developing. Our hypothesis is maternal                       months of age, calves were individually fed
supplementation of high levels of ruminally                  a common diet in a Broadbent Calan gate
undegradable protein during early                            system. Calves were fed ad libitum a ration
pregnancy will positively affect feed                        that was 10.4% Protein and 75.0% TDN.
efficiency and growth of progeny.                            Calves were weighed bi-weekly and serum
Therefore, our objectives were to determine                  was collected.
the growth characteristics of progeny born                   At the conclusion of the feeding period,
to dams supplemented with high or low                        steers were finished at the New Mexico

1
 The work was graciously supported by the NMSU
Agricultural Experiment Station and USDA-Hatch funds.

                                                        14
State University Campus Education and                 supplements with 36% or 50% of the
Research Center and then harvested at the             protein coming from by-pass protein during
University of Arizona Food Product and                early pregnancy can improve offspring
Safety Lab.                                           growth rates up to weaning. By-pass
Results and Discussion                                protein can typically be found in
                                                      supplements containing corn by-products
Weaning weights tended to be greater for              (e.g. dried distillers’ grains) or animal
calves born to dams supplemented with                 proteins (non-ruminant animal products).
HRUP averaging 84 lbs. greater than CON               Although more work is needed to further
and 47 lbs. greater than LRUP. Likewise,              determine how by-pass protein can impact
dry matter intake during the feeding period           reproductive performance of female
was greater for progeny from dams fed                 offspring.
supplemental protein during early gestation.
                                                      Literature Cited
However, average daily gain and feed
                                                      Barker, D. J. P., C. N. Martyn, C. Osmond,
efficiency was not different among the
                                                      C. N. Hales, and C. H. D. Fall. 1993.
treatment groups. Carcass traits, including
                                                      Growth in utero and serum cholesterol
hot carcass weight, marbling score, ribeye
                                                      concentrations in adult life. B.M.J.
area, and yield grade, were not statistically
                                                      307:1524-1527. doi:10.1136/bmj.
impacted by maternal protein
                                                      307.6918.1524
supplementation, However, numerically, hot
carcass weights were 53 lbs heavier for               Funston, R. N., J. L. Martin, D. C. Adams,
HRUP compared to CON. That result has                 and D. M. Larson. 2010. Winter grazing
the potential to garner producer’s greater            system and supplementation of beef cows
income if ownership is retained.                      during late gestation influence heifer
                                                      progeny. J. Anim. Sci. 88:4094-4101. doi
We conclude that despite dietary intake
                                                      10.2527/jas.2010-303
increasing in progeny from dams fed
supplemental ruminally undegradable
protein during early gestation, growth
performance is not impacted to a large
degree. Weaning weights of calves from
treated groups showed promise of being
greater when dams were supplemented but
future research is needed to determine if
differences in intake would remain as
animals grew with age and if and how
supplementation might impact other
production parameters such as
reproduction.
Summary and New Mexico Impact
Cow nutrition during pregnancy is
something producers should manage very
carefully. Poor nutrition during this time can
have long-term impacts on subsequent calf
performance. This research has
demonstrated that providing protein

                                                 15
The Sustainable Southwest Beef
Coordinated Agriculture Project
(CAP) is funded by USDA
National Institute of Food and
Agriculture, Agriculture and Food
Research Initiative’s Sustainable
Agricultural Systems (SAS)
program.

   The
   Sustainable Southwest
   Beef CAP
   Grant #2019-69012-29853
   A five-year USDA-NIFA funded project that promotes ranch and rangeland resilience
   in the Western US. The diverse team is evaluating:
          1. Heritage Raramuri Criollo cattle,
          2. Precision ranching technologies, and
          3. Supply chain options
   as strategies to help keep ranching and rangelands ecologically and economically
   healthy as climate, markets, and policies change.
Long-Term Declining Trends in Chihuahuan Desert Forage Production in Relation to
                            Precipitation and Ambient Temperature
   Matthew M. McIntosh*, Jerry L. Holechek†, Sheri A. Spiegal‡, Andres F. Cibils†, Richard E.
                                                Estell‡
  *Graduate Research Assistant, † Professor, Department of Animal and Range Sciences New
 Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003; ‡ research Animal Scientist, US Department
 of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM
                                               88003.
Key words: Climate change, Forage, Grazing capacity
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the New Mexico Agricultural
Experiment Station (Project 072944). It was funded with a grant from the US Dept of
Agriculture National (USDA) Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Funds to J. L. Holechek
and A. F. Cibils (Grant # 1019148). Partial funding was provided by the USDA Agricultural
Research Service Jornada Experimental Range and the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research
(LTAR) network.
Introduction                                            clipping, drying, and weighing annual growth
        Rising temperatures and more                    across a ~2,500 ac pasture from 1967 –
frequent droughts are posing new                        2018.
challenges to livestock producers in the                       Stocking rates were closely controlled
southwestern United States and arid lands               in our study pasture which was lightly
elsewhere (Havstad et al., 2018). Various               stocked for 25-30% utilization under
models predict climate change will adversely            continuous year-long grazing for the whole
affect the Chihuahuan Desert into the next
                                                        study period. Precipitation data were
century, and specifically range livestock
                                                        recorded via four evenly spaced rain gauges
production, because it is dependent on
perennial grass growth (Briske et al., 2015).           monitored monthly throughout the whole
However, site-specific information regarding            study. Temperature data were collected at
climate change impact on Chihuahuan                     the neighboring USDA – ARS Jornada
Desert vegetation is lacking and urgently               Experimental        Range       headquarters
needed (Briske et al., 2015).                           throughout     the   entire  study    period.
        We analyzed a 52-yr time series                 Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
(1967 − 2018) of precipitation, ambient                 (NDVI) data, a remotely sensed vegetation
temperature, and perennial grass production             green-up indicator, was acquired for the
(PGP), as well as a 14-yr (2001 − 2014)                 2001-2014 period from MODIS satellite
satellite image time series to evaluate recent          images, and growing season metrics were
trends in annual vegetation growth patterns.            calculated using TIMESAT procedures
                                                        developed by Jönsson and Eklundh (2004).
Materials and Methods
        Vegetation of our study area is typical
                                                        Results and Discussion
of the Chihuahuan Desert. Perennial
                                                               Perennial grass production was
grasses of interest were primarily black
                                                        positively associated with December
grama,      dropseeds,     and     threeawns.
                                                        through September precipitation (r =
Perennial grass production was determined
                                                        0.69; P < 0.01) but negatively associated
using clipping methods, which involved
                                                        with spring and summer (May − September)
                                                 16
maximum average ambient temperature
(r = − 0.47; P <     0.01;    P=     statistical
significance, r = regression correlation
coefficient). Perennial grass production
decreased by 43% in the second
(1993 − 2018) compared with the first half
(1967 − 1992) of our study (147 vs. 85 lbs
dry matter • ac− 1; P < 0.01). Precipitation
was lower and more erratic in the second
half of the time series, decreasing by 18.6%
(10.4 ± .6 vs. 8.5 ± 0.6 in; P = 0.01).
Conversely, mean maximum and mean
ambient temperatures were higher during
the 1993 – 2018 vs. the 1967-1992 periods
(max temperature: 76.1 ± 0.3 vs. 77.5 ±
0.3°F; P < 0.01; mean ambient temperature:
57.9 ± 0.3 vs. 59.5 ± 0.5°F; P < 0.01).
        MODIS-derived green-up analysis
showed that growing seasons began and
ended later and became shorter (P < 0.05)
over the 14 yr analyzed (Figure 1). During
this period, increasing maximum spring and              Figure 1. Seasonal changes in mean
summer        (May − September)       ambient           Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
temperatures       were    associated      with         (NDVI) for our research site from 2001 to
decreasing growing season NDVI values                   2014. Green sections of the curve denote
(P < 0.01).                                             growing season for each year based on
        Over the 52-yr study period,                    satellite greenness analyses.
Chihuahuan Desert rangelands at our
research site lost 43% of grazing capacity              Summary and New Mexico Impact
based on PGP. Nine drought years occurred                      The 43% mean reduction in PGP in
in the second half of our study compared                our second 26-yr study period (1993 − 2018)
with 2 years in the first half. Our research            means that a ranch that could support 250
supports predictions by climate scientists              cow-calf pairs in the late 1960s may now
that higher temperatures, more frequent                 sustainably support only 150 pairs. As this
droughts, and lower, as well as more erratic,           scenario plays out, the ranching industry will
precipitation will adversely influence grazing          need to rapidly adopt innovation strategies,
capacity of rangelands in the southwestern              like use of adapted livestock genetics, to
United States.                                          stay in business.

                                                   17
Havstad, K.M., J.R. Brown, R. Estell, E.
                                                    Elias, A. Rango, C. Steele, 2018.
References                                          Vulnerabilities of Southwestern US
                                                    Rangeland-based animal agriculture to
Briske, D.D., L.A., Joyce, H.W. Polley, J.R.        climate change. Clim. Change 1–16.
Brown, K. Wolter, J.A. Morgan, B.A.
McCarl, D.W. Bailey, 2015. Climate-change           Jönsson, P., Eklundh, L. 2004. TIMESAT—
adaptation on rangelands: Linking regional          a program for analyzing time-series of
exposure with diverse adaptive capacity.            satellite sensor data. Comput. Geosci. 30:
Front. Ecol. Environ. 13: 249–256.                  833–845.

                                               18
Heat tolerance of Raramuri Criollo and Angus-Hereford beef cows grazing Chihuahuan
                                 Desert pastures in summer

S. Nyamuryekung’e*, A. F. Cibils*, R. E. Estell†, A. L. González†, S. Spiegal †, M. McIntosh*
*
 Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM,
88003, USA; † Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental
Range, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

Acknowledgements                                     Hatch project 1000985 (A. Cibils) and SAS
This research was a contribution from the            CAP grant # 12726269.
Long-Term Agroecosystem Research
(LTAR) network. LTAR is supported by the             Keywords
United States Department of Agriculture.             Chihuahuan Desert, Climate Change,
Partial support was provided by the USDA             Raramuri Criollo, Thermotolerance
National Institute of Food and Agriculture,

Introduction                                         used temperature loggers attached to blank
        Heat stress is a prominent challenge         intravaginal CIDRs (Controlled Internal Drug
for beef cattle producers in the southwestern        Release device) devoid of hormones to
United States because of extended hot                record animal body temperature (BodyT),
weather periods that are exacerbated by              and GPS collars to record position and
higher relative humidity during the summer           ambient temperature (CollarT) in the
monsoon season. Climate change trends in             proximity of the cow. All sensor data were
the region will likely intensify existing            logged at 10 min intervals. A landscape
weather-related challenges and affect the            thermal map (LandT) was developed from
economic viability of the beef industry at           Landsat satellite imagery to examine habitat
large (Reeves et al., 2017).                         use in relation to surface temperature. Air
        Heat tolerance varies among cattle           temperature (AirT) was recorded by a
breeds and is defined as an animal's ability         nearby weather station.
to regulate its core body temperature when                  BodyT dynamics for cows of each
exposed to conditions of thermal stress              breed was initially explored (BodyT vs. Time)
(Renaudeau et al., 2012). The objective of           for each of the deployment periods. Data
this study was to compare foraging patterns          were then processed within four daytime
of Raramuri Criollo (RC) and Angus x                 segments (ToD): dawn (sunrise – 9AM); pre-
Hereford (AH) cows in relation to ambient            noon (9AM – noon); post-noon (noon –
heat and body temperature during summer              3PM); and dusk (3PM – sunset). Analysis of
in the Chihuahuan Desert.                            variance was used to determine the effect of
                                                     breed (AH or RC) and ToD on animal BodyT,
Materials and Methods                                CollarT, LandT selection, or animal
       Cows of each breed (mean BW ~545              movement variables. We also conducted
kg and ~350 kg for AH and RC, respectively)          within breed analyses comparing cool
grazed separately in two adjacent rangeland          morning vs. hot afternoon values of all
pastures (~1,100 ha, each) at the Jornada            variables.
Experimental Range. The study was
replicated over two years (2016-17). We

                                                19
Results and Discussion

                                                      Figure 2 Core body temperature (BodyT oF,
                                                      solid lines; Primary Y-axis) and ambient
                                                      temperature in the proximity of cows (CollarT
                                                      o
                                                       F, dashed lines; Secondary Y-axis).
                                                      Temperature is plotted against four time of
Figure 1 Core body temperature (BodyT)                day segments: dawn; pre-noon; post-noon;
monitored with intravaginal temperature               and dusk. Asterisks signify breed differences
loggers (iButton sensors) set to record data          within time of day.
every 10 min for two weeks. (RC; red AH;
blue line)                                                   Comparison of cooler dawn (coolest)
                                                      vs. post-noon (hottest) hours, revealed
       Average BodyT of cows of both                  increasing AirT (22.64 vs. 29.84 oC P< 0.01)
breeds showed a clear diurnal cyclic pattern          that was associated with selection of cooler
(Figure 1). RC cows appeared to accumulate            patches in the pasture by RC (45.85 vs.
less body heat during the day perhaps due             45.13 oC P< 0.01) but not AH cows (45.47
to a superior ability to dissipate heat load.         vs. 45.35 oC P= 0.49). RC cows appeared to
BodyT and CollarT of cows of both breeds              increase movement rates during hot
increased as a day progressed. However,               afternoon vs. cool morning hours and were
RC     cows     maintained     lower     body         therefore apparently able to select cooler
temperature (BodyT) during the hottest                landscape patches, which may have helped
afternoon hours despite being exposed to              them dissipate heat more effectively
apparent higher local ambient temperatures            (Nyamuryekung’e et al. in review). Raramuri
(CollarT) (Figure 2). Heat dissipation rate is        Criollo cows appear to exhibit greater
a function of surface area to volume ratio.           thermotolerance than Angus-Hereford beef
RC cows in this study had an estimated                cows.
surface area-volume ratio that was 16%                Summary and New Mexican Impact
greater than that of AH counterparts (RC:                    Mitigating heat stress challenges
0.096 vs. AH: 0.083 cm2*cm-3).                        projected to affect beef cattle in the
                                                      southwestern US might depend on the use
                                                      of adapted cattle genetics. Our results
                                                      suggest that heritage breeds such as the
                                                      Raramuri Criollo could be a valuable tool for
                                                      ranchers seeking to adapt to challenges

                                                 20
associated with a hotter and            drier
Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem.

      University Approvals
      All animal handling protocols were
approved by New Mexico State University
IACUC (protocol: 2015-021).

References                                           production from Western US rangelands.
                                                     Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 70, 529–539.
Nyamuryekung'e, S., Cibils, A., Estell, R.E.,
                                                     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2017.02.005
McIntosh, M., Gonzalez, A.L., D.E.,
VanLeeuwen, D., Spiegal, S.A., Martha, A.            Renaudeau, D., A. Collin, S. Yahav, V. De
Grazing behavior and body temperature of             Basilio, J.L. Gourdine, R.J. Collier, 2012.
heritage vs. commercial beef cows in                 Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to
relation desert ambient temperatures.                alleviate heat stress in livestock production.
Journal of Arid Environments in review.              Animal 6, 707–728.
Reeves, M.C., K.E. Bagne, J. Tanaka,                 https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111100244
2017. Potential climate change impacts on            8
four biophysical indicators of cattle

                                                21
Weight Gain and Carcass Quality of Desert Grass-fed Rarámuri Criollo vs Crossbred
Steers

   Matthew M. McIntosh*, Andrés F. Cibils*, Richard E. Estell†, Shelemia Nyamuryekung’e*,
Alfredo L. González†, Qixu Gong‡, Huiping Cao‡, Sheri A. Spiegal†, Sergio A. Soto-Navarro*,
                                    Amanda D. Blair**
       *
         Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces,
NM 88003, USA, †United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service,
Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA, ‡Department of Computer Science,
New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA, **Department of Animal Science,
South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
Keywords: Beef cattle, grass finished steers, heritage genetics, livestock behavior
Introduction                                       acceptable weight gains and carcass
        A majority of climate models predict       qualities when finished on grass. We
that the American Southwest will become            evaluated two cohorts (cohort: 1 = 31; cohort
increasingly hotter and drier with more            2 = 26) of Rarámuri Criollo (RC), Mexican
variable precipitation regimes (Polley et al.,     Criollo (MC) and Criollo x beef-breed
2017) which will accelerate shrub                  crossbred (XC) steers to investigate effects
encroachment (Gherardi and Sala 2015) and          of biotype on growth and carcass traits.
will likely continue to cause significant
declines in forage resources for livestock         Materials and Methods:
(McIntosh et al., 2019). The grass-finished,               All animal handling protocols were
local, and organic meats market was valued         approved by the New Mexico State
at $1 to 3 billion in 2015 (Cheung and             University Institutional Animal Care and Use
McMahon, 2017) and is estimated to be              Committee (Protocol 2016-019). Steers
growing at an annual rate of 100%; however,        were weighed approximately once every 2-
only 20% of US grass-fed beef is produced          mo. Steers entered the study at 15 mo.
in the western states (Cheung and                  (Cohort 1) and 7 mo. (Cohort 2) and were
McMahon, 2017). Use of low-input desert-           developed and finished on rangeland at 30
adapted beef cattle biotypes like Rarámuri         mo. Average daily gain was calculated for
Criollo cattle (Anderson et al. 2015), is one      each biotype and cohort by subtracting the
of several climate adaptation strategies           finial weight from the start weight and
gaining momentum among ranchers in arid            dividing by the total number of days that
systems (Holechek et al. 2020). Viability of       steers were in the study. Steers were
these enterprises increasingly depends on          provided cake supplement from 8-15 mo. of
producers’ willingness to implement climate-       age. Weight and carcass data were
smart management approaches to meet                analyzed using analysis of variance.
ever-increasing demand for healthy beef
products (Spiegal et al. 2020).                    Results and Discussion
        Criollo   cattle   producers     often             Final live weights of XC (cohort 1 =
crossbreed their cows with improved beef-          849.6 ± 21.2 lbs; cohort 2 = 1064.8 ± 21.8
breed bulls or retain and/or develop their         lbs) were greater than RC (cohort 1 = 763.2
yearlings on rangeland because of limited          ± 20.3 lbs; cohort 2 = 932.8 ± 17.2 lbs) and
markets for Criollo calves. However, it is         MC (cohort 1 = 776.7 ± 18.5 lbs; cohort 2 =
unknown if Criollo steers can achieve              943.8 ± 21.6 lbs), but all reached marketable

                                              22
You can also read