Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02) - Media and entertainment - EY
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02) Media and entertainment
“ The growth of subscription online video has taken place alongside tectonic structural changes in the wider home entertainment landscape, such as the widespread accessibility of high-speed data, an erosion of traditional multichannel TV subs and a rising number of broadband-only homes. Source: SNL Kagan
Table of contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Accounting considerations for the license of content 4 3. Accounting considerations for the production of content for self-distribution 12 4. Digital content presentation and disclosure 17
1
Introduction
For media and entertainment (M&E) companies,
digital distribution is transforming every facet of
their businesses. The rise of social media, widespread
broadband availability, faster internet connections
and the popularity of smartphones and tablets have
changed the demands and expectations of media
audiences and created an astounding variety of new
digital products and services. Perhaps nowhere is the
transformation as visible as in the growth of content
that is accessible through digital services.
2 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)
Nowhere is the
transformation as
visible as in the
growth of internet
content streaming.
How should digital download and streaming should apply the guidance in Accounting Standards
service providers account for the licensing and Codification (ASC) 926-201 for costs incurred by
production of movies and television shows? entities to produce films or episodic television series
and the guidance in ASC 920-3502 for costs incurred
Many of the digital download and streaming service
to license content from another party that will be
providers (digital providers) that offer movies and
transmitted or broadcast.
television shows (content) over the internet (digital
services) are licensing content and creating their This publication describes considerations for entities
own content (digital content). This isn’t very different that have adopted the guidance in ASU 2019-02
from what traditional broadcasters and producers of and license or produce content for distribution on
films or television shows have always done. They are digital services. Entities that have not adopted ASU
however distributing content in a different manner. 2019-02 should refer to our publication, Accounting
We, therefore, believe that entities that license or for digitally distributed content (before adoption of
produce content to be distributed to consumers on ASU 2019-02). We expect new questions to arise as
a digital service should follow the M&E industry- technology and business models continue to evolve.
specific accounting guidance that has historically For the remainder of this publication, the term
been applied by traditional broadcasters and licensed content refers to the rights acquired under a
producers of films or television shows. “license agreement” for content (program material),
and the term “owned content” refers to content
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
owned (produced) by the entity.
issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2019-02 to
improve the accounting for costs of films and license This publication addresses considerations under US
agreements for program materials in light of the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP),
changes in production and distribution models in the and differences may arise when applying accounting
M&E industry. The ASU explains how digital providers standards outside of the US.
1. ASC 926-20, Entertainment – Films, Other Assets – Film Costs.
2. ASC 920-350, Entertainment – Broadcasters, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.
Introduction | 3
2
Accounting
considerations
for the license
of content
1. Should digital providers that license content through digital services. The accounting for owned
apply ASC 920,3 which addresses the content is addressed in ASC 926.5 See Chapter 3 for
accounting and reporting by a broadcaster more details on the application of ASC 926.
licensee for the rights acquired under a
2. How is the license of content accounted for
license agreement?
under ASC 920?
ASC 920 defines a broadcaster as “an entity or an
A licensee of content that determines that it meets
affiliated group of entities that transmits radio4 or
the definition of a broadcaster should capitalize the
television program material.” While ASC 920 has
licensed content and record the related liability on
historically been applied by broadcasters that license
the balance sheet when all of the following conditions
content that they transmit over the airwaves and
have been met:
through cable and satellite networks, other types
of digital providers have considered whether they • The license period begins.
should apply this guidance when they license content • The cost of each program is known or
that will be transmitted or distributed through their reasonably determinable.
digital services. Entities that transmit licensed
content through digital services apply the ASC 920 • The program material has been accepted by the
guidance because the transmission of licensed licensee in accordance with the license agreement.
content, regardless of the technical distribution • The program material is available for its
mechanism, is within the scope of ASC 920. first showing.
ASC 920 does not apply to broadcasters that own Entities make a policy election, which must be
the content shown on their cable, network or local applied consistently, to initially record the asset and
television outlets, and we believe that, by extension, related liability for licensed content at either the fair
it would not apply to owned content that is distributed
4 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)
value or gross amount of the liability. If a present The variety of arrangements and combinations of
value technique is used to determine the fair value, fee structures can make the evaluation of when
the difference between the gross and net liability is the cost of each program is known or reasonably
recorded as interest in accordance with ASC 835.6 determinable even more challenging. The capitalized
costs should be allocated to the individual programs
While it is generally relatively easy to determine
within a package on the basis of relative value of
whether the program material has been accepted
each program.
and is available for its first showing, determining
when costs of each program are known or reasonably Entities may determine that costs incurred to license
determinable may be more difficult. Agreements for content are not capitalizable (even though the license
licenses of content may be structured in a variety of period has begun) because all of the capitalization
ways, including: criteria above have not been met. Two common
scenarios when this may occur include the following:
• Fixed fee per title, episode or series
• An entity makes payments to acquire licensed
• Fixed fee for an entire contract (e.g., a group of
content in advance of exploiting the content. If
movies and television shows)
the capitalization criteria under ASC 920 have
• Variable fee based on advertising (e.g., advertising not been met, in practice, entities initially classify
metrics achieved, revenue-sharing arrangements), these costs as a Prepaid Asset and reclassify
subscription fees or number of views them to a Programming Asset when the ASC 920
• Variable fee based on advertising, subscription fees capitalization criteria are met. The asset is then
or number of views with a minimum guarantee amortized using an appropriate methodology as
described in Section 3 as the content is exploited.
• A combination of fixed and variable fees
3. ASC 920, Entertainment — Broadcasters.
4. For further guidance on accounting for radio arrangements, refer to ASC 928, Entertainment — Music.
5. ASC 926, Entertainment — Films.
6. ASC 835, Interest.
Accounting considerations for the license of content | 5
• An entity agrees to make payments as the content
is exploited. Because the costs of the program
are not known or reasonably determinable until
the content is exploited, which is aligned with
the entity’s use of the content, entities would
simultaneously capitalize and amortize the content
as described in Scenarios 2 and 3 below.
Under any circumstance, entities must assess the
realizability of the costs before capitalizing them.
Finally, an entity must evaluate its predominant
monetization strategy when it first incurs costs to
acquire licensed content which are capitalizable
under ASC 920. That is, an entity must determine
whether it expects to predominantly monetize a title
either: (1) on its own or (2) together with other films
and/or license agreements (i.e., as part of a film
group as described in further detail in Chapter 2,
Section 3c). This evaluation is critical because
it affects an entity’s impairment assessment of
these costs.
The following illustration discusses typical scenarios.
Illustration 1 — assessing whether the cost of each program is known or reasonably determinable when the
arrangement has predetermined titles
The following scenarios describe common
Licenses 10 movies from Producer A payment terms for the license of content and the
appropriate accounting:
Scenario 1
Producer A DVC Upon delivery and its acceptance of the 10 movie
Pays monthly subscription fee
titles, DVC agrees to pay a total of $1 million (or
$100,000 per movie as specified in the contract and
determined to be the value of each licensed title) for
DVC’s customer DVC’s library
the unlimited right to broadcast the content for two
Unlimited on-demand access to library years (the license period). Because the contract price
is fixed and the cost of each program is known, DVC
would capitalize the total amount of $1 million at the
Digital Video Co. (DVC) licenses 10 movies from
beginning of the license period when the content is
Producer A for a two-year period. DVC provides its
available for streaming and would begin to amortize
customers with unlimited on-demand access to this
it using an appropriate methodology as described in
library of digital content viewed online in exchange
Section 3 below. If the fee per title was not specified
for a monthly subscription fee. Therefore, DVC
in the contract or the contractually specified fees
expects to predominantly monetize this content as
were not an approximation of the value of each
part of a film group.
right, DVC would allocate the $1 million fee
on a relative fair value basis to each title and
capitalize accordingly.
6 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)
Scenario 2 with each title is not known and there is significant
In addition to paying $1 million for the unlimited right uncertainty about future monthly billings under
to broadcast the 10 movies for two years, DVC agrees month-to-month subscriber agreements, DVC would
to pay Producer A an additional fee of $1 for each not capitalize any of the license fees (i.e., it would not
online stream of a movie from this library. In this case, record licensed content and the related liability when
similar to Scenario 1, DVC would capitalize $1 million the movies have been delivered and are available
at the beginning of the license period and would begin for showing). Instead, DVC would only capitalize and
to amortize it using an appropriate methodology amortize the license fees when the programs are
as described in Section 3 below. Because the cost streamed because that is when the capitalization
capitalization criteria under ASC 920 are likely not met criteria in ASC 920 are met.
for the additional $1 fee for each online stream until
the content is exploited, DVC would not capitalize any More complex scenarios, including those with
additional costs until that time. Once the content is additional variability in payments (e.g., variable
exploited and the cost capitalization criteria are met, license payments that increase or decrease over
the additional $1 fee per online stream payable by DVC time or that are phased in or out depending on
would be capitalized and amortized immediately as viewership), should be considered carefully to
each movie was streamed. determine not only when (or whether) the related
license asset and liability are recorded but also the
Scenario 3 subsequent amortization of the license asset. See
Upon delivery and its acceptance of the 10 movies, Section 3 for further details on how different types of
DVC agrees to pay Producer A 1% of the subscription digital content should be amortized under ASC 920.
fees it collects from its monthly subscribers over
the next two years. Because the cost associated
Accounting considerations for the license of content | 7
3. How should different types of digital content amortization approximates the amortization that
be amortized under ASC 920? would be calculated on a program-by-program basis.
Capitalized costs of license agreements, including ASC 920 provides for the following amortization
titles in a film group, are amortized under ASC 920 methods to be applied based on the expected future
based on the estimated number of future showings, economic benefit to be earned:
except for licenses with unlimited showings, which
may be amortized over the period of agreement Method of
Description
amortization
because the estimated number of future showings
may not be determinable. Accelerated Under this method, amortization is
amortization recorded based on the expected value
The unit of account should be determined prior to of each airing. For example, if the
selecting the appropriate method of amortization. first showing is expected to be more
ASC 920 provides for the following: valuable than reruns or if historical or
expected viewership trends indicate
Type of content Program-by- Amortized as there will be higher viewership in the
licensed program basis a series initial periods following release, an
accelerated method of amortization
Feature programs
may be more appropriate.
(e.g., current
releases) Straight line If each showing is expected to
generate similar value, a straight-line
Episodic television
amortization method may be more
(e.g., first run or
appropriate. Under this method,
available)
amortization is recorded evenly
Program series and (typically over the shorter of the license
other syndicated period or estimated period of use).
products
When selecting the most appropriate method to
Feature programs can be amortized, in accordance amortize programming, the type of content, expected
with ASC 920, on an aggregated basis if the resulting benefit to the entity and available viewing metrics that
could be measured should also be considered.
8 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)Illustration 2 — accelerated amortization
DVC pays $5 million to license a feature program (a
Licenses one hit movie hit movie that is part of a successful franchise) for a
two-year term from Producer A. The license provides
DVC the exclusive US premiere rights to the title on
its streaming platform. Based on viewer history with
Producer A DVC similar titles, DVC estimates that approximately 75%
$5m of all expected viewership for this feature program
will occur in the first month of the license term. DVC
therefore amortizes $3.75 million (75% of $5 million)
in the first month and the remaining asset value will
Amortization
$3.75m be amortized evenly over the remaining 23 months
of the license term, as this reflects DVC’s expected
views based on its history with similar titles.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
License period (months)
3a. How do windows of availability affect the 3b. How should a licensee account for an
amortization pattern? arrangement that includes geographies or
platforms where the license period begins
Certain license arrangements may also include
before the expected exploitation period?
specific periods (i.e., windows) in which the licensee
may exploit the licensed content. For example, a Certain license arrangements may include rights that
three-year arrangement for a license of a feature will not be exploited at the beginning of the license
program may include the rights to air the feature period. For example, a licensee may have the rights to
program only in years one and three. In these cases, a title in multiple countries but may not plan to launch
the licensee will allocate the fee to the two license the service (i.e., broadcast the content) in a particular
periods (i.e., years one and three) based on their market until a later date within the license period. In
relative fair value. Based on the values allocated this case, the licensee would record separate assets
to each license period, the licensee will record based on the individual markets’ relative fair value
amortization in year one but will not record any and would not begin to record amortization of each
amortization during the second year because it does asset until the later of the license period or the launch
not receive any benefit from the content. Noteworthy date in each individual market. The amortization
is that whether the arrangement is viewed as one method would be determined considering the factors
license (a three-year license for a feature program discussed on the previous page.
that can only be broadcast in year one and year three)
or two separate one-year licenses, the method of
amortization will not change and should be based on
the expected value of the individual one-year periods.
Accounting considerations for the license of content | 93c. What are some of the impairment If an entity does not predominantly monetize its
considerations for entities that license licensed content together with other films and/
digital content? or license agreements but monetizes its licensed
content on an individual title-by-title basis, it
An entity’s impairment considerations for licensed
would test the licensed content for impairment in
content will depend on the entity’s monetization
accordance with ASC 920-350. Although titles may
strategy for a title. That is, an entity is required
not be part of a film group, the guidance in ASC 920
to determine whether its licensed content is
does allow for licensed content (within the scope of
predominantly monetized with other films and/or
ASC 920) to be aggregated under various methods
license agreements (e.g., through a subscription
to assess it for impairment. For example, content
fee for access in a particular geography). If it is, the
may be aggregated by program, daypart, series
entity must identify a “film group” as the unit of
or package. A daypart could be an aggregation of
account for impairment testing in accordance with
programs broadcast during a particular time of day
the guidance in ASC 926-20. A film group represents
(e.g., daytime, evening, late night) or programs of
the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are
a similar type, genre or channel (e.g., sports, news,
largely independent of the cash flows of other films
children’s shows, an overall cable channel). Typically,
or license agreements. In this instance, it may be
content is aggregated for purposes of the impairment
appropriate for the content to be aggregated on an
test based on how the content is monetized (i.e., the
overall basis for the entire library of content (akin
lowest level of identifiable cash flows). For example,
to traditional cable channels with similar programs
if advertising is sold by daypart on a specific channel,
for the overall channel). This means entities may
this may be the appropriate aggregation method for
aggregate both produced and licensed content for
the impairment test.
impairment testing purposes and test for impairment
in accordance with ASC 926-20. See Chapter 3 for
further details.
10 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)Capitalized content costs are to be assessed for required to test the asset for impairment on an
impairment if projections of the expected benefit individual title basis before moving it into a film group.
(program usefulness) are revised downward. Under See Chapter 3, Sections 5 and 7 for further details.
ASC 920, broadcasters test licensed content for
3d. Should a license for an extended period be
impairment if a program is not expected to be
accounted for under ASC 920?
monetized as projected or if the planned use for
a title changes. If capitalized content costs are Licenses for an extended period of time typically
impaired, the amount by which the unamortized include older titles or a library of titles. Such licenses
capitalized content costs exceeds the fair value are accounted for under ASC 920. While a licensee
should be written off to the income statement. has access to content for an extended period,
typically such licenses are amortized over a shorter
If a licensee decides to stop using or abandons a
defined period (e.g., a 10- to 20-year period that
particular title (e.g., a specific film or television show)
factors in industry experience or the experience of
before the end of the license period, the remaining
the licensee with similar titles) if it is determined that
unamortized cost for that title should be written off
the expected benefit from the content is de minimis
to fair value, which most likely will be zero unless the
later in the license term.
licensee has rights to further monetize the title.
If an entity’s monetization strategy for a title changes
significantly, the entity is required to reassess its
predominant monetization strategy for that title. An
entity that changes its predominant monetization
strategy from an individual title to a film group is
Accounting considerations for the license of content | 113
Accounting
considerations for the
production of content
for self-distribution
1. Should entities that produce content to be production costs. The costs of acquiring a film’s
distributed on their own digital services copyright rather than licensing the content would be
platform apply ASC 926? capitalizable under ASC 926.
While ASC 926 has traditionally been applied by When assessing whether costs related to production
film and episodic television producers, questions of digital content are capitalizable, a producer should
have arisen about whether entities that produce assess whether the costs relate directly to the
programs for distribution on their streaming and production of the digital content. Upon an entity’s
online services should apply this guidance. ASC adoption of ASU 2019-02, capitalization of costs
926 applies to “all entities that are producers7 or incurred to produce episodic television series is no
distributors8 that own or hold rights to distribute or longer limited until an entity has persuasive evidence
exploit all kinds of films9 in one or more markets that secondary market revenues exist. However,
and territories.” entities must still carefully determine which costs are
capitalizable and whether the costs are recoverable.
ASC 926 also notes that it “applies to films exploited
by the entity directly, or licensed or sold to others.” When considering participations10 and residuals11
The definition of a producer as “an entity that for a title, it is important to understand whether the
produces and has a financial interest in films for terms of the arrangements differ for digital content
exhibition in movie theaters, on television, or and more traditional content. For example, while
elsewhere” would include an entity that produces residuals traditionally are calculated based on a
a film or series that is exhibited on a streaming or percentage of gross revenues from ancillary
other online service, thus subjecting those activities markets, they may be based on another measure for
to ASC 926. digital content such as production costs.
2. How are costs incurred for production of All costs capitalized related to the development of
content accounted for by entities that content under ASC 926, whether for the production
produce their own digital content under of films or episodic television, are referred to as
ASC 926? “film costs” in the guidance and the remainder of
this publication.
The guidance in ASC 926 states that entities should
capitalize costs to produce films, which includes When an entity first incurs costs associated with the
episodic television series and digital content costs, as production of a film or episodic television series, it
those costs are incurred. must evaluate its predominant monetization strategy.
That is, the entity must determine whether its
The types of costs associated with developing
predominant monetization strategy for a particular
and producing digital content for distribution that
title is (1) on its own (e.g., theatrical release) or (2)
are typically capitalizable include the (1) rights
together with other films and/or license agreements
to screenplays, (2) salaries for actors, directors
(i.e., as part of a film group).
and other personnel, and (3) production and post-
12 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)This evaluation is critical because it affects an advertising). If the estimates are revised, the change
entity’s impairment of these costs. would be accounted for prospectively as of the
beginning of the fiscal year of the change.
2a. How are costs incurred for production of
an app to deliver content accounted for by For a produced film that is predominantly monetized
entities that produce their own app? on its own but also is monetized with other films
and/or license agreements, entities should make a
Costs incurred for building a digital service app or a
reasonably reliable estimate of the value attributable
direct-to-consumer app for a specific film are likely
to the exploitation of the film when monetized with
not within the scope of ASC 926. Rather, entities
other titles. Revenue that the entity expects to
should assess whether such costs are capitalizable
generate from the monetization of a particular title
under other accounting guidance (e.g., internally
while it is part of a broader group must be included in
developed software), if appropriate.
the estimate of ultimate revenue. The following is the
3. What is the individual-film-forecast method basic calculation to amortize capitalized film costs
in ASC 926? (e.g., starting in year one for a film):
For a produced film that is predominantly monetized
on its own, capitalized film costs are amortized Year 1 amortization
using the individual-film-forecast-computation Year 1 revenues
method under ASC 926. Under this method, an Ultimate costs
entity amortizes capitalized film costs in a manner Ultimate revenues
that yields a constant rate of profit over the Year 2 amortization
ultimate period, which considers a film’s actual
Year 2 revenues Ultimate costs remaining
current period revenue and estimated remaining
as of the beginning of
“ultimate revenue.” Ultimate revenue is an estimate Ultimate revenues the current fiscal year
of all revenues expected to be received from the remaining as of the
exploitation, exhibition and sale of a film in all beginning of the current
fiscal year
markets and territories (e.g., theatrical, home video,
television, digital services, DVDs/Blu-ray or direct
7. A producer is defined in ASC 926 as “an individual or an entity that produces and has a financial interest in films for exhibition in movie theaters, on
television, or elsewhere.”
8. A distributor is defined in ASC 926 as “an entity or individual that owns or holds the rights to distribute films. The definition of distributor of a film does not
include, for example, those entities that function solely as broadcasters, retail outlets (such as video stores), or movie theaters.”
9. Films is defined in ASC 926 as ”feature films, television specials, television series, or similar products (including animated films and television programming)
that are sold, licensed, or exhibited, whether produced on film, video tape, digital, or other video recording format.”
10. A participation is contingent compensation paid to the creative talent (e.g., actors, writers, directors and producers) that is based on a formula described in
the contract.
11. Residuals are paid to various guild members who work on the production of content as additional compensation for use of the content in ancillary markets,
such as home video, pay television and cable, network television and digital services.
Accounting considerations for the production of content for self-distribution | 13Ultimate costs are an estimate of all capitalizable In practice, entities often use viewership curves12 as a
film costs to be incurred related to the production of proxy for revenues, which reflects the use of the titles
the film. over the exploitation period. This is because entities
that monetize content as part of a film group typically
4. For a film that is predominantly monetized
do not have direct revenues to attribute to a particular
as part of a film group, what is the
title and, therefore, are unable to apply the individual-
appropriate amortization methodology?
film-forecast method. Entities will need to use
For titles that are predominantly monetized as part judgment to determine the amortization methodology
of a film group, an entity must make a reasonably that is representative of the use of a title.
reliable estimate of the portion of unamortized film
Entities that predominantly monetize content as
costs that is representative of the use of the title.
part of a film group will also be required to reassess
An entity must expense such amounts as it exhibits
estimates of use of a title within a film group as of
or exploits the title. For example, an entity with
each reporting date. Any changes in estimates will
a digital download streaming platform that only
be accounted for prospectively as of the date of
generates subscription revenue from the platform
the change, which is different than the accounting
(i.e., no direct revenues from individual titles) may
for any changes in estimates under the individual-
produce a film and only show it on its platform. In
film-forecast method (which are accounted for
this example, the entity receives subscription fees
prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year of
from third parties that are not directly related to a
the change).
particular film.
12. Viewership curves are typically established based on historical viewership data for a group of similar titles.
14 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)• Changes in release plans, such as a reduction in
the initial release pattern
• Insufficient funding or resources to complete
production of the content and to market it effectively
• The failure of a film to meet expectations set
before its release due to factors such as:
• A significant adverse change in technological,
regulatory, legal, economic or social factors that
could affect the public’s perception of a film or
the availability of a film for future showings
• A significant decrease in the amount of ultimate
revenue expected to be recognized
For a film that is predominantly monetized as part of a
film group, examples of impairment indicators include:
• A significant adverse change in technological,
regulatory, legal, economic or social factors that
could affect the fair value of the film group
• A significant decrease in the number of
subscribers or forecasted subscribers or the loss
of a major distributor
• A current period operating or cash flow loss
combined with a history of operating or cash
flow losses, or a projection of continuing losses
associated with the use or exploitation of a
5. What are some of the considerations for a film group
producer when assessing digital content for For films that are predominantly monetized on their
impairment under ASC 926? own, impairment testing is performed on a title-
Unamortized costs are to be assessed for impairment, by-title basis. However, for films that are part of a
regardless of whether the produced content (e.g., film group, impairment testing is performed at the
film or television series) is completed. Producers of film group level and would include licensed content
content should perform a review whenever events (if identified as part of the film group) as stated
or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair in Chapter 2. That is, entities must determine the
value of the produced content may be less than lowest level of identifiable cash flows that are largely
its unamortized costs. Additionally, ASU 2012-07 independent of the cash flows of other films and/or
eliminated the rebuttable presumption in ASC 926 license agreements to identify the film group, which
that conditions existing after the balance sheet date is the unit of account for testing impairment.
but before the financial statements are issued were If an entity determines the fair value of produced
presumed to have existed at the balance sheet date. content using a traditional discounted cash flow
For a film that is predominantly monetized on its approach, the discount rate should consider the
own, examples of impairment indicators include: expectations about possible variations in the amount
or timing of the most likely cash inflows and outflows.
• An adverse change in the expected performance of If an entity uses an expected cash flow approach,
the content prior to release the future cash inflows and outflows are probability
• Actual costs substantially in excess of budgeted costs weighted by period to address the uncertainty in
cash flows.
• Substantial delays in completion or release schedules
Accounting considerations for the production of content for self-distribution | 156. What is the accounting if an entity abandons For example, assume an entity originally determines
a film within a film group? that it will monetize a film through theatrical and
home entertainment release and will license the
In some cases, an entity may test a film group for
film to a third-party streaming service. The entity
impairment, but not have any impairment charge.
concludes that its predominant monetization
However, if an entity substantively removes a title
strategy for the film is on a title-by-title basis. In
from the film group because it no longer intends to
the following year, the entity launches its own
include the title on its streaming platform, it must
streaming service and decides to monetize the film
write off remaining unamortized film costs. For
exclusively through this new platform. The entity
example, an entity may abandon production on a title
concludes that it has a significant change in its
before it is released or decide to remove a title from
monetization strategy and that there is a change in
its service offering for a considerable period of time.
its predominant monetization strategy (from title by
In these instances, entities should assess whether
title to a film group).
the title has been substantively abandoned and,
therefore, unamortized film costs associated with In contrast, an entity’s expectations for revenue
that title should be written off. could change, but its monetization strategy could
stay the same. For example, assume that an entity
7. What are some of the considerations for a
determines that it will monetize a film through
producer when reassessing whether there
theatrical release and through pay-per-view and then
has been a significant change in an entity’s
on its own streaming platform in later years. The
monetization strategy?
entity concludes that its predominant monetization
If an entity’s monetization strategy for a title changes strategy for the film is on a title-by-title basis.
significantly, the entity is required to reassess its If the mix of revenues generated from the film’s
predominant monetization strategy for that title. An theatrical release and streaming distribution differs
entity that changes its predominant monetization from expectations over the life of the title but the
strategy from an individual title to a film group must monetization strategy remains the same, this would
test the asset for impairment before moving it into a not represent a significant change.
film group.
16 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)4
Digital content
presentation and
disclosure
1. Are there any presentation and disclosure Commitments and contingencies
considerations that producers should take Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K requires Securities
into account? & Exchange Commission (SEC) registrants to
provide a tabular presentation of known contractual
Balance sheet
obligations as of the end of the most recent fiscal
There is diversity in practice in the financial
year. SEC Financial Release No. 83, “Commission
statement line item used for capitalized costs
Guidance on Presentation of Liquidity and Capital
related to licensed and owned content. The guidance
Resources Disclosures in Management’s Discussion
in ASC 920 and ASC 926 does not specify the
and Analysis (FR-83),” notes that the goal of
caption, and reasonable captions include captions
the contractual obligations table is to present a
that are commensurate with the related revenue
meaningful snapshot of cash requirements arising
streams such as film costs, filmed entertainment
from contractual payment obligations. Further,
and television costs, licensed program rights,
under ASC 920, “broadcasters shall disclose
programming and other inventory, content library (or
commitments for license agreements that have
rights) and broadcast rights.
been executed but were not reported because they
For both licensed and produced content costs that do not meet the conditions for recording a liability.”
are capitalized, ASC 920 and ASC 926 require that Thus, content producers and licensees of content
the assets be segregated between licensed (even if disclose commitments for future amounts owed (i.e.,
part of a film group) and produced content, but the purchase obligations) under various agreements,
guidance does not prescribe classification as either including licensing and programming arrangements,
current or noncurrent on the balance sheet. Under as well as production costs such as talent and
ASC 920-405, the related liability is segregated employment agreements. For certain arrangements,
between current and noncurrent on the balance determining when to report the commitment may
sheet based on the payment terms. Further, the require judgment. The determination of whether
guidance requires entities to separately disclose the an entity has entered into such a commitment will
components of film costs (under ASC 926-20) for depend upon the terms of the agreement (e.g., when
films predominantly monetized on their own and for production has begun, when the content has been
films predominantly monetized with other films aired on a network or when there is a minimum
and/or license agreements. number of episodes to be licensed).
Statement of cash flows
Under the guidance in ASC 926, cash outflows for
film costs, participation costs and exploitation costs
must be classified within operating activities in the
statement of cash flows. ASC 920 also specifies that
cash flows for licensed content should be classified
as cash outflows from operating activities.
Digital content presentation and disclosure | 17Summary of ASC 920 & ASC 926 disclosure requirements
Below are the disclosure requirements for entities applying the guidance in ASC 920 and ASC 926:
ASC 920 Entertainment—Broadcasters
1. Present cash outflows for the costs incurred to obtain the rights acquired under a license agreement for
program material as operating activities in the statement of cash flows and include the amortization of the
capitalized costs of license agreements for program material in the reconciliation of net income to net cash
flows from operating activities. (920-230-45-1)
2. Separately present the asset recorded for the rights acquired under a license agreement for program material
from films that are accounted for under Subtopic 926-20 either on the balance sheet or in the notes to financial
statements. (920-350-45-1)
3. Network affiliation agreements and other such items ordinarily are presented in the balance sheet of a
broadcaster as intangible assets. (920-350-45-2)
4. Disclose methods of accounting for the rights acquired under a license agreement, including, but not limited to:
(920-350-50-1)
a. The method or method(s) used in computing amortization
b. For impairment, a description of the unit(s) of account used for impairment testing and the method(s) used
for determining fair value
5. Disclose in the financial statements or the notes to financial statements for each period for which a statement
of financial performance is presented: (920-350-50-2)
a. The aggregate amortization expense for the period
b. The caption in the income statement where the amortization is recorded
6. For the most recent annual period for which a statement of financial position is presented, disclose in the notes
to financial statements the portion of the costs of license agreements recognized at the date of the most recent
statement of financial position that an entity expects to amortize within each of the next three operating cycles.
(920-350-50-3)
7. An entity shall disclose its operating cycle if it is other than 12 months. (920-350-50-3)
8. For impairment amounts recognized for a license agreement that is not included in a film group, disclose in the
notes to financial statements that include the period in which the impairment losses are recognized: (920-350-
50-4)
a. A description of the facts and circumstances leading to the impairment
b. The amount of impairment losses
c. The caption in the income statement where the impairment losses are recorded
d. If applicable, the segment(s) under Topic 280 where the impairment losses are recorded
9. Segregate the liability recorded for the obligation incurred under a license agreement for program material
between current and noncurrent based on the payment terms. (920-405-45-1)
10. Disclose commitments for license agreements that have been executed but were not reported because they do
not meet the conditions for recording a liability as specified in ASC 920-350-25-2. (920-440-50-1)
18 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)ASC 926 Entertainment—Films
1. Separately disclose film costs from the rights acquired under a license agreement for program materials within the
scope of Subtopic 920-350 either on the balance sheet or in the notes to financial statements. (926-20-45-2)
2. Disclose methods of accounting for film costs, including, but not limited to: (926-20-50-1A)
a. The method(s) used in computing amortization
b. For impairment, a description of the unit(s) of account used for impairment testing and the method(s) used
for determining fair value
3. Disclose the components of film costs (including released, completed and not released, in production, or
in development or preproduction) separately for films predominantly monetized on their own and films
predominantly monetized with other films and/or license agreements. (926-20-50-2)
4. Disclose in the financial statements or the notes to financial statements for each period for which a statement
of financial performance is presented: (926-20-50-4A)
a. The aggregate amortization expense for each period, separately for films predominantly monetized on
their own and films predominantly monetized with other films and/or license agreements
b. The caption in the income statement where the amortization is recorded
5. Disclose the following in the notes to financial statements for the most recent annual period for which a
statement of financial position is presented (separately for films predominantly monetized on their own and for
films predominantly monetized with other films and/or license agreements): (926-20-50-4B)
a. For completed and not released films, the portion of the costs of completed films that an entity expects to
amortize during the upcoming operating cycle
b. An entity shall disclose its operating cycle if it is other than 12 months
c. For released films, the portion of the costs of released films recognized at the date of the most recent
statement of financial position that an entity expects to amortize within each of the next three operating
cycles
6. For impairment amounts recognized for films or film groups, disclose the following information in the notes to
financial statements that include the period in which the impairment is recognized: (926-20-50-4C)
a. A general description of the facts and circumstances leading to the impairment
b. The aggregate amount of impairment losses
c. The caption in the income statement where the impairment losses are recorded
d. If applicable, the segment(s) under Topic 280 where the impairment losses are recorded
7. For acquired film libraries, disclose the amount of remaining unamortized costs, the method of amortization,
and the remaining amortization period. (926-20-50-5)
8. Present cash outflows for film costs, participation costs, exploitation costs, and manufacturing costs
as operating activities in the statement of cash flows, and include the amortization of film costs in the
reconciliation of net income to net cash flows from operating activities. (926-230-45-1)
9. Disclose the amount of accrued participation liabilities that the entity expects to pay during the upcoming
operating cycle. (926-405-50-1)
10. Disclose the methods of accounting for participation costs. (926-405-50-2)
11. Disclose the methods of accounting for exploitation costs. (926-720-50-1)
Digital content presentation and disclosure | 19Exhibit 1: Key differences between ASC 920 and ASC 926
ASC 920 ASC 926
Cost The fee paid for licensed content is Costs related directly to the production of
capitalization capitalized when the license period begins content are capitalized as film costs as they
and all of the following conditions have are incurred.
been met:
• The cost of each program is known or
reasonably determinable.
• The program material has been accepted
by the licensee.
• The program material is available for its
first showing.
Amortization Capitalized costs are amortized using any of For films that are predominantly monetized
methods the following, as appropriate: on their own, capitalized film costs are
• Straight-line amortized under the individual-film-forecast-
computation method in a manner that yields
• Accelerated
a constant rate of profit over the ultimate
Feature programs should be amortized period, assuming there are no changes in
on a program-by-program basis; estimates. This considers a film’s actual
however, amortization as a package may current period revenue and estimated
be appropriate if it approximates the remaining “ultimate revenue.”
amortization that would have been provided
For films that are predominantly monetized
on a program-by-program basis.
as part of a film group, an entity should
Program series should be amortized as make a reasonably reliable estimate of the
a series. portion of unamortized film costs that is
representative of the use of the film. An
entity must expense such amounts as it
exhibits or exploits the film.
Impairment For content predominantly monetized on For content predominantly monetized on its
testing methods its own, impairment testing is performed own, impairment testing is performed on a
on a title-by-title basis. However, licensed title-by-title basis.
content may be aggregated by program, ASC 926-20 provides multiple indicators to
daypart, series or package to assess it test for impairment. These indicators differ
for impairment. between content predominantly monetized
Companies are required to test for as part of a film group and content
impairment if management’s expectations predominantly monetized on its own.
of the programming usefulness of a
program, series, package or daypart
are revised downward.
20 | Accounting for digitally distributed content (after adoption of ASU 2019-02)Key contacts
EY Global Media & Entertainment
Global Media & Entertainment Assurance Sector Leader and regional contacts (Americas)
Ian Eddleston, Global Media & Entertainment
+1 213 977 3304 ian.eddleston@ey.com
Assurance Services Leader (Los Angeles, US)
Matt Askins, Partner, TMT Assurance Practice
+1 212 773 0681 matt.askins@ey.com
(New York, US)
Samantha Tully, Media & Entertainment National
+1 212 773 4886 samantha.tully@ey.com
Accounting Industry Resident (New York, US)
Alex Bender, Americas TMT Industry Leader
+1 415 894 8709 alex.bender@ey.com
(San Francisco, US)
Rachel Simons, Partner, National Accounting
+1 216 583 2583 rachel.simons@ey.com
(Cleveland, US)
Global Media & Entertainment Sector Leader and service line leaders
John Nendick, Global Deputy Global TMT
+1 213 977 3188 john.nendick@ey.com
Sector Leader (Los Angeles, US)
John Harrison, Global Media & Entertainment
+1 212 773 6122 john.harrison@ey.com
Leader (New York, US)
Janet Balis, Global Media & Entertainment
+1 212 773 1422 janet.balis@ey.com
Advisory Services Leader (New York, US)
Alan Luchs, Global Media & Entertainment
+1 212 773 4380 alan.luchs@ey.com
Tax Services Leader (New York, US)
William Fisher, Global Media & Entertainment
+44 20 7951 0432 wfisher@uk.ey.com
Transaction Advisory Services Leader (London, UK)
Key contacts | 21EY | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. Information about how EY collects and uses personal data and a description of the rights individuals have under data protection legislation are available via ey.com/privacy. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. This news release has been issued by EYGM Limited, a member of the global EY organization that also does not provide any services to clients. © 2019 EYGM Limited. All Rights Reserved. 07331-191US CSG No. 1904-3120587 ED None ey.com
You can also read
