BMA547 ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR - Tasmanian School of Business & Economics (TSBE) (School)
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Tasmanian School of Business & Economics (TSBE) (School)
College of Business and Economics (College)
BMA547
ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
12.50 Credit points
Semester 1, 2019
Unit Outline
Dr Kim Backhouse
CRICOS Provider Code: 00586BCONTACT DETAILS
Unit coordinator
Unit coordinator: Kim Backhouse
Campus: Hobart
Email: Kim.Backhouse@utas.edu.au
Phone: 0409 975 249
Room location and number: TBA
Consultation hours: Available by appointment.
© The University of Tasmania 2018CONTENTS
WHAT IS THE UNIT ABOUT? 2
UNIT DESCRIPTION 2
INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES 2
GRADUATE QUALITY STATEMENT 3
ALTERATIONS TO THE UNIT AS A RESULT OF STUDENT FEEDBACK 3
PRIOR KNOWLEDGE &/OR SKILLS 3
HOW WILL I BE ASSESSED? 4
ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE 4
ASSESSMENT DETAILS 4
HOW YOUR FINAL RESULT IS DETERMINED 6
SUBMISSION OF ASSIGNMENTS 6
ACADEMIC REFERENCING 8
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT 9
WHAT LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES ARE THERE? 10
MYLO 10
RESOURCES 10
ACTIVITIES 13
COMMUNICATION 14
CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS 14
FURTHER INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE 15
UNIT SCHEDULE 16
ACCREDITATION 23
AACSB ACCREDITATION 23
Page 1 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourWHAT IS THE UNIT ABOUT?
Unit description
Organisational Behaviour (OB) is the study of human behaviour at the individual,
group and organisational level. The primary purpose of this unit is to improve the
management of organisations through the development of knowledge of human
behaviour. To do this, managers must be able to understand the behaviour of others
and attempt to predict and influence it. It is hoped that, through your active
participation in this unit, you will gain an appreciation of organisational behaviour as
a field of study, which can be used in the effective management of people and
organisations.
Organisational Behaviour is a field of study that draws upon a diverse range of
disciplines (including psychology, social psychology, sociology, anthropology, political
science and economics) for a systematic and integrated approach to the study of
human behaviour. While its concepts, theories and understandings about human
behaviour draw upon these disciplines, Organisational Behaviour is unique in that it
takes an integrated and contingency approach to management, has an applied focus,
and rests on scientific foundations.
Intended Learning Outcomes
On completion of this unit, you will be able to:
1. understand and explain the complexity of key individual, group and
organisational level influences on human behaviour in organisations.
2. knowledge of theories, concepts and models in organisational behaviour and the
ability to apply them critically and creatively to topical issues.
3. apply current theory and practice to personal workplace experience.
4. to effectively communicate organisational behaviour theory and practice.
Page 2 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourGraduate Quality Statement
Successful completion of this unit supports your development of course learning
outcomes, which describe what a graduate of a course knows, understands and is able
to do. Course learning outcomes are available from the Course Coordinator. Course
learning outcomes are developed with reference to national discipline standards,
Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF), any professional accreditation
requirements and the University of Tasmania’s Graduate Statement.
The University of Tasmania experience unlocks the potential of
individuals. Our graduates are equipped and inspired to shape and
respond to the opportunities and challenges of the future as
accomplished communicators, highly regarded professionals and
culturally competent citizens in local, national, and global society.
University of Tasmania graduates acquire subject and multidisciplinary
knowledge and skills, and develop critical and creative literacies and
numeracies and skills of inquiry. They demonstrate the ability to apply
this knowledge in changing circumstances. Our graduates recognise and
critically evaluate issues of social responsibility, ethical conduct and
sustainability, are entrepreneurial and creative, and are mindful of their
own wellbeing and that of the community. Through respect for diversity
and by working in collaborative ways, our graduates reflect the values of
the University of Tasmania.
Alterations to the unit as a result of student feedback
N/A
Prior knowledge &/or skills
N/A
Page 3 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourHOW WILL I BE ASSESSED?
Assessment schedule
Assessment task Date due Percent Links to Intended
weighting Learning Outcomes
Assessment task 1:
Weeks 4,6,8,10 & 12 25% LO1, LO2, LO3
Online quiz
Assessment task 2:
Monday 15 April 35% LO2, LO4
Report
Assessment task 3:
Weekly – Beginning
Case Study 10% LO1, LO4
Week 4.
Presentation
Assessment task 4:
27 May 2019 30% LO2, LO3, LO4
Essay
Assessment details
Assessment Task 1: Online quiz
Task Five online quizzes consisting of multiple choice questions.
Description
Criterion Criterion Description Measures
Number ILO:
1 Identify key implications arising from OB issues. LO1
2 Identify and discuss strategies to improve work LO2
performance based on relevant OB theory.
3 Apply specific aspects of OB theory from the analysis LO3
to real world examples.
Task Length 10 questions – 10 minutes to complete.
Due by date Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10 & 12
Assessment Task 2: Analytical Report
Task Analytical Report relating to the group level - group
Description and individual work
Criterion Criterion Description Measures
Number ILO:
1 Analyse and evaluate OB issues and apply theories, LO2
concepts and models.
Page 4 BMA547 Organisational
Behaviour2 Identify and discuss strategies to improve work LO2
performance based on relevant OB theory.
3 Use theories, concepts and models to justify and LO2
defend understanding of topical
Organisational Behaviour issues.
4 Communicate in Australian workplace standard LO4
language, literacy and formats.
5 Use scholarly and discipline specific language and LO4
formats (including Harvard referencing).
Task Length 2500 Words
Due by date Monday 15 April, 2019 by 3pm via MyLO Submission Dropbox
Hard Copy to be submitted in class for the Hobart students only.
Assessment Task 3: Case Study Presentation
Task Presentation of a case study – group work (individual for distance
Description students)
Criterion Criterion Description Measures
Number ILO:
1 Identify and explain key individual, group and LO1
organisational level influences
on human behaviour.
2 Identify key implications arising from OB issues. LO1
3 Integrate theory, research and examples to illustrate LO1
understanding.
4 Communicate in Australian workplace standard LO4
language, literacy and formats.
5 Communicate complex information in oral English LO4
language to justify and defend a position.
Task Length -
Due by date Weekly – Beginning Week 4. Groups allocated in Week 1
Distance students can do individually or in a group.
Assessment Task 4: Capstone Essay
Task Essay relating to the organisational level – individual work
Description
Criterion Criterion Description Measures
Number ILO:
1 Analyse and evaluate OB issues and apply theories, LO2
concepts and models.
2 Use theories, concepts and models to justify and LO2
defend understanding of topical Organisational
Behaviour issues.
Page 5 BMA547 Organisational
Behaviour3 Analyse and summarise LO3
academic literature in OB.
4 Apply specific aspects of OB theory from the analysis LO3
to real world examples.
5 Communicate in Australian workplace standard LO4
language, literacy and formats.
6 Use scholarly and disciplinespecific language and LO4
formats (including Harvard referencing).
Task Length 2500 Words
Due by date 27 May 2019 by 4pm via MyLO Submission Dropbox
Hard Copy to be submitted in class for the Hobart students only.
How your final result is determined
To pass this unit, you need to demonstrate your attainment of each of the Intended
Learning Outcomes.
Your grade will be determined in the following way:
Your overall mark in this unit will be determined by combining your results from each
assessment task. These marks are combined to reflect the percentage weighting of
each task. You need to achieve an overall score of at least 50% to successfully complete
this unit. It is expected that you will seek help (from the unit coordinator in the first
instance), well before the due date, if you are unclear about the requirements for an
assessment task.
- PP (pass) at least 50% of the overall mark but less than 60%
- CR (credit) at least 60% of the overall mark but less than 70%
- DN (distinction) at least 70% of the overall mark but less than 80%
- HD (high distinction) at least 80% of the overall mark
All grades are provisional, until confirmation by the Assessment Board at the end of
semester.
Submission of assignments
The act of submitting your assignment will be taken as certification that it is your own
work.
Assignments must be submitted electronically through the relevant assignment tab in
MyLO. You must ensure that your name, student ID, unit code, tutorial time and
tutor’s name (if applicable) are clearly marked on the first page. If this information is
missing, the assignment will not be accepted and, therefore, will not be marked.
Page 6 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourWhere relevant, Unit Coordinators may also request you to submit a paper version of
your assignment. You will be advised by the Unit Coordinator of the appropriate
process relevant to your campus.
Please remember that you are responsible for lodging your assessment items on or
before the due date and time. We suggest you keep a copy. Even in a perfect system,
items sometimes go astray.
Requests for extensions
In this Policy:
1. (a) ‘day’ or ‘days’ includes all calendar days, including weekends and public
holidays;
(b) ‘late’ means after the due date and time; and
(c) ‘assessment items’ includes all internal non-examination based forms of
assessment
2. This Policy applies to all students enrolled in TSBE Units at whatever Campus or
geographical location.
3. Students are expected to submit assessment items on or before the due date and
time specified in the relevant Unit Outline. The onus is on the student to prove
the date and time of submission.
4. Students who have a medical condition or special circumstances may apply for an
extension. Requests for extensions should, where possible, be made in writing to
the Unit Coordinator on or before the due date. Students will need to provide
independent supporting documentation to substantiate their claims.
Penalties
Late submission of assessment items will incur a penalty of 10% of the total marks
possible for that piece of assessment for each day the assessment item is late unless an
extension had been granted on or before the relevant due date.
Assessment items submitted more than five (5) days late will not be accepted.
Academic staff do NOT have the discretion to waive a late penalty, subject to clause 4
above.
Review of results and appeals
Review of Assessment is available to all students once the University has released the
final result for a unit. If you are dissatisfied with your final result, you may apply to
have it reviewed. Applications for a review of assessment are due within 10 working
days of the release of the final result in the unit. When applying for a review, you must
pay a $50 fee.
Page 7 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourIf you wish to have a piece of internal assessment reviewed as part of the review
process, please state this clearly on the application form referred to above and include
that assessment item with your application.
Please read and follow the directions provided by the University at:
http://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/314622/Review-of-Assessment.pdf
Academic referencing
In your written work you will need to support your ideas by referring to scholarly
literature, works of art and/or inventions. It is important that you understand how to
correctly refer to the work of others, and how to maintain academic integrity.
The University library provides information on presentation of assignments, including
referencing styles and should be referred to when completing tasks in this unit.
Please read the following statement on plagiarism. Should you require clarification
please see your unit coordinator or lecturer.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a form of cheating. It is taking and using someone else's
thoughts, writings or inventions and representing them as your own; for
example, using an author's words without putting them in quotation
marks and citing the source, using an author's ideas without proper
acknowledgment and citation, copying another student's work.
If you have any doubts about how to refer to the work of others in your
assignments, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing
guidelines. You may also find the Academic Honesty site on MyLO of
assistance.
The intentional copying of someone else’s work as one’s own is a serious
offence punishable by penalties that may range from a fine or
deduction/cancellation of marks and, in the most serious of cases, to
exclusion from a unit, a course or the University.
The University and any persons authorised by the University may
submit your assessable works to a plagiarism checking service, to
obtain a report on possible instances of plagiarism. Assessable
works may also be included in a reference database. It is a
condition of this arrangement that the original author’s
permission is required before a work within the database can be
viewed.
Page 8 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourFor further information on this statement and general referencing guidelines, see the
Plagiarism and Academic Integrity page on the University web site or the Academic
Honesty site on MyLO.
Academic misconduct
Academic misconduct includes cheating, plagiarism, allowing another student to copy
work for an assignment or an examination, and any other conduct by which a student:
a. seeks to gain, for themselves or for any other person, any academic advantage
or advancement to which they or that other person are not entitled; or
b. improperly disadvantages any other student.
Students engaging in any form of academic misconduct may be dealt with under the
Ordinance of Student Discipline, and this can include imposition of penalties that
range from a deduction/cancellation of marks to exclusion from a unit or the
University. Details of penalties that can be imposed are available in Ordinance 9:
Student Discipline – Part 3 Academic Misconduct.
Page 9 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourWHAT LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES ARE THERE?
MyLO
MyLO is the online learning environment at the University of Tasmania. This is the
system that will host the online learning materials and activities for this unit.
Getting help with MyLO
It is important that you are able to access and use MyLO as part of your study in this
unit. To find out more about the features and functions of MyLO, and to practice
using them, visit the Getting Started in MyLO unit.
For access to information about MyLO and a range of step-by-step guides in pdf, word
and video format, visit the MyLO Student Support page on the University website.
If something is not working as it should, contact the Service
Desk (Service.Desk@utas.edu.au, phone 6226 1818), or Request IT Help Online.
Resources
Required readings
You will need the following text [available from the Co-op Bookshop]:
Robbins, SP & Judge, TA 2017, Organizational behaviour, 17th Global edn, Pearson
Education, Harlow, England. Available also as an eText at
http://www.pearson.com.au/9781292146447
Recommended readings
While there is no expectation for you to read further than the prescribed text and
journal articles in the study schedule, there is a range of other OB texts and journals
available if you are interested in extending your understanding of OB theory and
practice. All recommended textbooks, or a previous edition, are available from the
Morris Miller Library. Besides those listed below there are many eBooks available from
the UTAS catalogue which allow five minutes browsing.
Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behaviour, 2015,
Annual Reviews, Vol. 2.
Ashkanasy, NM, Wildrom, CPM & Peterson, MF (eds) 2011, Handbook of
organizational culture & climate, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Bratton, J, Sawchuk, P, Forshaw, C, Callinan, M & Corbett, M 2010, Work and
organizational behaviour, 2nd edn, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Page 10 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourChampoux, JE 2011, Organizational behaviour: integrating individuals, groups and
organizations, 4th edn, Routledge, New York.
Hellriegel, D & Slocum, JW 2010, Organizational behaviour, 13th edn, Cengage
Learning, Boston.
Huczynski, A & Buchanan, D 2010, Organizational behaviour, 7th edn, Pearson
Education Ltd, Harlow, England.
Johns, G, & Saks, AM 2014, Organisational behaviour, Pearson Canada, Toronto.
Kalliath, T, Brough, P, O'Driscoll, M, Manimala, MJ, Siu, OL & Parker, SK 2014,
Organisational behaviour: a psychological perspective for the Asia-Pacific, McGraw-
Hill, North Ryde NSW.
Kreitner, R & Kinicki, A 2013, Organisational behaviour, 10th edn, McGraw-Hill
College, Chicago.
McShane, SL, Olekalns, M & Travaglione, T 2010, Organisational behaviour: on the
Pacific Rim, 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, Roseville NSW.
McShane, SL & Von Glinow, MA 2015, Organizational behaviour: emerging knowledge,
global reality, 7th edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Newstrom, JW 2011, Organizational behavior: human behavior at work, 13th edn,
McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, USA.
Osland, JS & Turner, M 2010, The organisational behaviour reader, 9th edn, Prentice
Hall, New Jersey.
Ott, J, Parkes, S & Simpson R 2008, Classic readings in organisational behaviour, 4th
edn, Wadsworth, Belmont.
Robbins, SP & Barnwell N 2011, Organisation theory: concepts and cases, 5th edn,
Prentice Hall, Sydney.
Robbins, SP, Judge, TA, Millett, B & Boyle, M 2017, Organisational behaviour, 8th edn,
Pearson Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW.
Schein, EH 2010, Organizational culture and leadership, 4th edn, John Wiley & Sons,
San Francisco.
Wagner, JA & Hollenbeck, JR 2015 Organisational behaviour: securing competitive
advantage, Routledge, New York.
Page 11 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourWood, J, Zeffane, R, Fromholtz, M, Wiesner, R, Morrison, R, & Seet, P-S 2013,
Organisational behaviour: core concepts and applications, 3rd edn, John Wiley & Sons,
Brisbane.
Reading Lists
Reading Lists provide direct access to all material on unit reading lists in one place.
This includes eReadings and items in Reserve. You can access the Reading List for this
unit from the link in MyLO, or by going to the Reading Lists page on the University
Library website.
Other Required Resources
In addition to the texts recommended above, you are also expected to be familiar with
the key academic journals in the discipline from which useful insights may be derived.
In particular, you are encouraged to review regularly the relevant papers that are
published in:
• Academy of Management Executive
• Academy of Management Journal
• Academy of Management Review
• Administrative Science Quarterly
• Annual Review of Psychology
• Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
• Australian Journal of Management
• California Management Review
• Harvard Business Review
• Journal of Applied Psychology
• Journal of Management
• Journal of Occupational Psychology
• Journal of Organisational Behaviour Management
• Journal of Organizational Behaviour
• Journal of Personality & Social Psychology
• Organizational Behaviour & Human Performance
• Organizational Dynamics
• Personnel Psychology
• Sloan Management Review
Page 12 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourActivities
Learning expectations
The University is committed to high standards of professional conduct in
all activities, and holds its commitment and responsibilities to its
students as being of paramount importance. Likewise, it holds
expectations about the responsibilities students have as they pursue their
studies within the special environment the University offers.
Students are expected to participate actively and positively in the
teaching/learning environment. They must attend classes when
and as required, strive to maintain steady progress within the
subject or unit framework, comply with workload expectations,
and submit required work on time.
Specific attendance/performance requirements
In this unit, your active engagement will be monitored in the following way:
1. An in-class activity in week 2. Distance students will be requested to
complete Task in week 2 and email through to Kim.Backhouse@utas.edu.au; and
2. Active participation in the workshop discussions.
If you do not demonstrate evidence of having engaged actively with this unit by
completing these two activities by Week 4 of semester, your enrolment may be
cancelled, or you may be withdrawn from the unit.
Teaching and learning strategies
The University is committed to a high standard of professional conduct in all
activities, and holds its commitment and responsibilities to its students as being of
paramount importance. Likewise, it holds expectations about the responsibilities
students have as they pursue their studies within the special environment the
University offers. The University’s Code of Conduct for Teaching and Learning states:
Students are expected to participate actively and positively in the teaching/learning
environment. They must attend classes when and as required, strive to maintain
steady progress within the subject or unit framework, comply with workload
expectations, and submit required work on time.
During the first four weeks of this semester, your participation and engagement in this
unit will be monitored. If you do not demonstrate evidence of having engaged actively
with this unit by Week 4 of semester, your enrolment may be cancelled or you may be
withdrawn from the unit.
Page 13 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourWork Health and Safety (WHS)
The University is committed to providing a safe and secure teaching and learning
environment. In addition to specific requirements of this unit you should refer to the
University’s Work Health and Safety website and policy.
Communication
KEEPING UP WITH ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR THIS UNIT
Check the MyLO Announcement tool at least once every two days. The unit
Announcement will appear when you first enter our unit’s MyLO site. Alternatively,
click on the Announcement button (towards the top of the MyLO screen) at any time.
IF YOU HAVE A QUESTION
Other students may have the same question that you have. Please go to the Ask the
Class Discussion forum on the unit’s MyLO site. Check the posts that are already there
– someone may have answered your question already. Otherwise, add your question as
a new topic. Students are encouraged to support each other using this forum – if you
can answer someone’s question, please do. We will attempt to respond to questions
within 48 business hours. If your question is related to a personal issue or your
performance in the unit, please contact the appropriate teaching staff member by
email instead.
IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE THAT WILL IMPACT ON YOUR STUDIES OR THE
SUBMISSION OF AN ASSESSMENT TASK
If you have a personal question related to your studies or your grades, please contact
teaching staff by email.
For general questions about the unit, please add them to the Ask the Class Discussion
forum on the unit’s MyLO site. This way, other students can also benefit from the
answers.
Concerns and complaints
The University is committed to providing an environment in which any concerns and
complaints will be treated seriously, impartially and resolved as quickly as possible.
We are also committed to ensuring that a student may lodge a complaint without fear
of disadvantage. If you have a concern, information about who to contact for
assistance is available on the ‘How to resolve a student complaint’ page.
Page 14 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourFurther information and assistance
If you are experiencing difficulties with your studies or assignments, have personal or
life-planning issues, disability or illness which may affect your course of study, you are
advised to raise these with the unit coordinator in the first instance.
There is a range of University-wide support services available to you including Student
Learning Support, Student Advisers, Disability Services, and more which can be found
on the Student Support and Development page of the University website.
Should you require assistance in accessing the Library, visit their website for more
information.
Page 15 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourUnit schedule
WEEK DATE TOPIC/ MODULE/ FOCUS ACTIVITIES DUE
BEGINNING AREA DATE
1 25 February Introduction to the Muma, RD, Smith, B & Somers,
unit and assessments PA 2006, ‘Use of Mintzberg's
Model of managerial roles to
Module 1 –
evaluate academic
Introduction
Administrators’, Journal of
Allied Health, vol.35, no.2,
pp.65-74. Tengblad, S 2006, ‘Is
there a ‘New Managerial Work’?
A Comparison with Henry
Mintzberg's Classic Study 30
Years Later’, Journal of
Management Studies, vol.43,
no.7, pp.1437- 1461
2 4 March Module 2 – The Chiaburu, DS, Oh, I, Berry, CM,
Individual Li, N & Gardner, RG 2011, ‘The
five-factor model of personality
(Diversity in
traits and organizational
Organisations,
citizenship behaviours: a meta-
Personality and
analysis’, Journal of Applied
Values)
Psychology, vol.96, no. 6,
pp.1140-1166.
Clarke, S & Robertson, IT 2005,
‘A metanalytic review of the Big
Five personality factors and
accident involvement in
occupational and non-
occupational settings’, Journal of
Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, vol.
78, pp. 355-376.
Turnbull, H, Greenwood, R,
Tworoger, L & Golden, C 2010,
‘Skills Deficiencies in diversity
and inclusion in organizations:
developing an inclusion skills
measurement’, Academy of
Strategic Management Journal,
vol.9, no.1, pp.1-14.
Page 16 BMA547 Organisational
Behaviour3 11 March Module 2 cont. – The Tse, H & Troth, A 2013,
Public Individual (Emotions ‘Perceptions and emotional
Holiday. and moods, experiences in differential
Perception and supervisorsubordinate
There will be
Individual Decision- relationships’, Leadership &
no class or
making)
make up Organization Development
lecture for Journal, vol.34, no.3, pp.271-283.
this week.
4 18 March Module 3 – The Abbas, M, Raja U, Darr, W &
Individual (Attitudes Bouckenooghe, D 2014,
and Job Satisfaction, ‘Combined effects of perceived
Motivation politics and psychological capital
Concepts) on job satisfaction, turnover
intentions, and performance’,
Journal of Management, vol.40,
no.7, pp.1813-1830.
Loi, R, Yang, J & Diefendorff, JM
2009, ‘Four factor justice and
daily job satisfaction: a
multilevel investigation’, Journal
of Applied Psychology, vol. 94,
no. 3. Pp. 770-781. Michel, JS &
Bowling, NA 2013, ‘Does
dispositional aggression feed the
narcissistic response? The role of
narcissism and aggression in the
prediction of job attitudes and
counterproductive work
behaviors’, Journal of Business
and Psychology, vol.28, pp.93-
105.
Rozell, EJ, Pettijohn, CE &
Parker, RS 2011, ‘White vs, blue:
does the collar color affect job
attitudes and behaviors?’
Academy of Strategic
Management Journal, vol.10,
no.1, pp.65-79.
Van Dyne, L & Pierce, JL 2004,
‘Psychological ownership and
feelings of possession: three field
studies predicting employee
attitudes and organizational
citizenship behavior’, Journal of
Page 17 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourOrganizational Behavior, vol. 25,
pp. 439-459.
Wilkin, CL 2013, ‘I can't get no
job satisfaction: meta-analysis
comparing permanent and
contingent workers’, Journal of
Organizational Behaviour,
vol.34, pp.47-64.
5 25 March Module 3 cont. – The Bernhard, F & O'Driscoll, MP
Individual 2011, ‘Psychological ownership in
small family owned businesses:
leadership style and nonfamily-
employees’ work attitudes and
behaviours’, Group &
Organization Management,
vol.36, no.3, pp.345-384
6 1 April Module 4 - The Biron, M & Bamberger, P 2012,
Group ‘Aversive workplace conditions
and absenteeism: taking referent
(Foundations of
group norms and supervisor
Group Behaviour,
support into account’, Journal of
Understanding
Applied Psychology, March,
Working in Teams)
pp.1-12.
Du, J, Shin, Y & Choi, JN 2014,
‘Convergent perceptions of
organizational efficacy among
team members and positive
work outcomes in organizational
teams’, Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology.
Li, N, Kirkman, BL & Porter,
COLH 2014, ‘Toward a model of
work team altruism’, Academy
of Management Review, vol.39,
no.4, pp.541-565.
7 8 April Module 4 - Bradley, BH, Postlethwaite, BE,
continued Klotz, AC & Brown, KG 2012,
‘Reaping the benefits of task
conflict in teams: The critical
role of team psychological safety
climate,’ Journal of Applied
Page 18 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourPsychology, vol.97, no.1, pp.151-
158.
8a 15 April Module 5 – The Campbell, CR & Swift, CO 2006
Group (cont.) ‘Attributional comparisons
across biases and leader-
(Communication,
member exchange status’,
Leadership)
Journal of Managerial Issues, vol.
XVII, no. 3, pp. 393-408.
Ellinger, AE, Musgrove, CF,
Ellinger, AD, Bachrach, DG,
Elmadag Bas, AB & Wang, YL
2013, ‘Influences of
organizational investments in
social capital on service
employee commitment and
performance,’
Journal of Business Research,
vol.66, pp.1124-1133. OR
Ellinger, AD, Ellinger, AE,
Bachrach, DG & Wang, YL 2011,
‘Organizational investments in
social capital, managerial
coaching, and employee work-
related performance,’
Management Learning, vol. 42,
no.1, pp.67- 85.
Fay, MJ & Kline, SL 2011,
‘Coworker relationships and
informal communication in high
intensity telecommuting,’
Journal of Applied
Communication Research,
vol.39, no.2, pp.144-163.
Golden, TD, Veiga, JF & Dino,
RN 2008, ‘The impact of
professional isolation on
teleworker job performance and
turnover intentions: does time
spent teleworking, interacting
faceto-face, or having access to
communication enhancing
technology matter?’, Journal of
Page 19 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourApplied Psychology, vol. 93, no.
6, pp. 1412- 1421.
Grant, AM, &Sumanth, JJ 2009,
‘Mission Possible? The
Performance of Prosocially
Motivated Employees Depends
on Manager Trustworthiness’,
Journal of Applied Psychology,
vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 927-944.
Mid-semester break 18 April to 24 April (inclusive)
9 29 April Module 5 – The Treadway, DC, Breland, JW,
Group (cont.) Williams, LM, Cho, J, Yang, J &
Ferris, GR 2013, ‘Social influence
(Power and Politics)
and interpersonal power in
organizations: roles of
performance and political skills
in two studies,’ Journal of
Management, vol.39, no.6,
pp.1529-1553.
Jahangir, N, Akbar, MM &
Begum, N 2006 ‘The impact of
social power bases, procedural
justice, job satisfaction, and
organizational
commitment on employees’
turnover intention’, South Asian
Journal of Management, vol. 13,
no. 4, pp. 72-88.
Holland, P, Cooper, B & Hecker,
R 2015, ‘Electronic Monitoring
and Surveillance in the
Workplace: The Effects on Trust
in Management, and the
Moderating Role of
Occupational Type’, Personnel
Review, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1-27.
10 6 May Module 6 – The Katsikea, E, Theodosiou, M,
Organisation Perdikis, N & Kehagias, J 2011,
‘The effects of organizational
(Foundations of
structure and job characteristics
Organisational
on export sale managers’ job
Structure)
satisfaction and organizational
Page 20 BMA547 Organisational
Behaviourcommitment,’ Journal of World
Business, vol.46, pp.211-233.
11 13 May Module 6 – The Bellou, V 2011, ‘Organizational
Organisation culture as a predictor of job
satisfaction: the role of gender
(Organisational
and age’, Career Development
Culture)
International, vol.15, no. 1, pp.4-
19.
Jiang, JY, Sun, L-Y & Law, KS
2011, ‘Job satisfaction and
organizational structure as
moderators of the effects of
empowerment on organizational
citizenship behaviour: A
selfconsistency and social
exchange perspective’,
International Journal of
Management, vol.28, no.3, part 1,
pp.675-693.
Erkutlu, H 2011, ‘The moderating
role of organizational culture in
the relationship between
organizational justice and
organizational citizenship
behaviours,’ Leadership &
Organization Development
Journal, vol.32, no.6, pp.532-554.
Sharoni, G, Tziner, A, Fein, EC,
Shultz, T, Shaul, K & Zilberman,
L 2012, ‘Organizational
citizenship behavior and
turnover intentions: do
organizational culture and
justice moderate their
relationship?’ Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, vol.42,
pp.267-294.
12 20 May Module 7 – Furst, SA & Cable, DM, 2008,
Organisational ‘Employee resistance to
Change organizational change:
managerial influence tactics and
(Organisational
leadermember exchange’,
Change and Stress
Management)
Page 21 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourJournal of Applied Psychology,
vol.93, no.2, pp.453-462.
Podsakoff, NP, LePine, JA &
LePine, MA 2007, ‘Differential
challenge stressor-hindrance
stressor relationships with job
attitudes, turnover intentions,
and withdrawal behavior: A
meta-analysis’, Journal of
Applied Psychology, vol.92, no.2,
pp.438-454.
Carter, MZ, Armenakis, AA,
Field, HS & Mossholder, KW
2013, ‘Transformational
leadership, relationship quality,
and employee performance
during continuous incremental
organizational change,’ Journal
of Organizational Behavior,
vol.34, pp.942- 958.
Shin, J, Taylor, MS & Seo, MG
2012, ‘Resources for change: the
relationship of organizational
inducements and psychological
resilience to employees’
attitudes and behaviors towards
organizational change,’
Academy of Management
Journal, vol.55, no.3, pp.727-748.
Bono, JE, Glomb, TM, Shen, W,
Kim, E & Koch, AJ 2013, ‘Building
positive resources: effects of
positive events and positive
reflections on work stress and
health,’ Academy of
Management Journal, vol.56,
no.6, pp.1601- 1627.
13 27 May Review
Exam Period 8 – 25 June (inclusive)
Page 22 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourACCREDITATION
AACSB Accreditation
The Tasmanian School of Business and Economics (TSBE) is currently in the process of
applying for business accreditation with the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools
of Business (AACSB) – the lead program for accrediting business schools globally.
AACSB seeks to connect educators, students, and business to achieve a common goal –
to create the next generation of business leaders.
By joining AACSB and going through the accreditation process, TSBE is joining a
global alliance committed to improve the quality of business education around the
world, and to share the latest innovations in business education. Gaining Business
Accreditation with AACSB is a multi-year process involving TSBE demonstrating our
performance against the 15 accreditation standards.
Once complete, TSBE will join a select community of accredited business schools, with
only 7% of all business schools globally having completed the AACSB process. This
will further enhance the reputation of TSBE, and further enhance the global
recognition of your qualifications. To find out more about AACSB click here.
Page 23 BMA547 Organisational
BehaviourYou can also read
