Checklist of the reptiles from the Cancão Municipal Natural Park, state of Amapá, eastern Amazon, Brazil - Biotaxa
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Herpetology Notes, volume 14: 539-550 (2021) (published online on 18 March 2021)
Checklist of the reptiles from the Cancão Municipal Natural
Park, state of Amapá, eastern Amazon, Brazil
Carlos Eduardo Costa-Campos1,*, Patrick Ribeiro Sanches1, Fillipe Pedroso-Santos1,
Vinicius A. M. B. de Figueiredo1, Rodrigo Tavares-Pinheiro1, and Wirley Almeida-Santos2
Abstract. The distribution of the reptile species in the eastern Amazon region is still poorly known. Here we give a list of
reptile species from the Cancão Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil. We recorded
through active search a total of 57 species, including two turtles, one crocodilian, 30 lizards, and 24 snakes. Two species,
Mesoclemmys gibba (turtle) and Pseudoboa coronata (snake), were new records for the state of Amapá. The number of species
in forested and open area environments accounted for 62.5% and 37.5 % of total species sampled, respectively. Of the 57
recorded species, 42 were assigned as Least Concern according to the Red List of Threatened Species from the International
Union for Conservation of Nature, and 15 have not been evaluated so far. Our findings complement the available information
about the distribution and richness of species that compose the herpetofauna of Amazonia.
Keywords. Herpetofauna, Amazon biome, Filling gaps, Inventories.
Introduction conservation importance (Drummond et al., 2008;
Hilário et al., 2017).
Herpetofauna is particularly diverse in Brazilian
In the state of Amapá, herpetological inventories are
Amazon, with more than 375 species of reptiles (Ávila-
concentrated on anurans (Queiroz et al., 2011; Pereira-
Pires and Prudente, 2019). However, this number is
Júnior et al., 2013; Araújo and Costa-Campos, 2014;
likely underestimated due to the vast Amazonian extent
Campos et al., 2015; Benício and Lima, 2017; Lima
(6 million km2) and many areas that remain remote or
et al., 2017; Silva-e-Silva and Costa-Campos, 2018;
difficult to access and are still poorly known in terms of
Costa-Campos and Freire, 2019). Due to the lack of
their herpetofauna (Azevedo-Ramos and Galatti, 2002;
information about inventories on reptiles in the region,
Ávila-Pires et al., 2007; Ávila-Pires et al., 2010).
we present here the reptile species list based on novel
Despite the growing number of studies addressing the
data through field expeditions to the Cancão Municipal
geographic distribution and richness of the Amazonian
Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, in state
herpetofauna (e.g., Ávila-Pires et al., 2018; Fonseca
of Amapá, Brazil. Additionally, we briefly address the
et al., 2019; Debien et al., 2019; Freitas et al., 2020;
species conservation status based on the IUCN (2020)
Frazão et al., 2020), the diversity of these taxa in the
and new distribution records of some species.
state of Amapá is still poorly known. The state of
Amapá has about 72 % of its territory covered by
Materials and Methods
protected areas (Dias et al., 2016). The majority of the
state is within a continuum of 12 conservations units Study area. The Cancão Municipal Natural Park
and five indigenous lands, representing an area of great (CMNP), a National Park category (SNUC, 2000)
created by municipality of Serra do Navio, comprises
370 ha of Amazonian forest in the northwest centre
portion of the state of Amapá, Brazil (Figure 1). The
climate of the region is classified as Equatorial (Am of
1
Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departamento de Ciências
Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Köpper-Geiger classification), with average temperature
Macapá, Amapá 68903-419, Brazil. of 27.6 ºC and rainfall annual of 2,850 mm (Alvares et
2
Secretaria Municipal de Turismo, Prefeitura Municipal de al., 2013).
Serra do Navio, Serra do Navio, Amapá 68948-000, Brazil. Data sampling. Surveys of lizards and snakes were
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: eduardocampos@unifap.br undertaken from March 2018 to December 2018. We
© 2021 by Herpetology Notes. Open Access by CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. established two sampling transects of 5 km each in
540 Carlos Eduardo Costa-Campos et al. Figure 1. Map of the Cancão Municipal Natural Park, in the municipality of Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil. the study area: (1) Terra Firme trail at Cancão forest Mesoclemmys gibba (Schweigger, 1812), Paleosuchus (0.90275°N, 52.00497°W) and (2) River Amapari trail trigonatus (Schneider, 1801), Corallus caninus (0.9008°N, 52.0134°W). Three sampling events were (Linnaeus, 1758), Sibon nebulatus (Linnaeus, 1758), conducted by three people in each of the two sites. Each Dipsas variegate (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854), sampling event consisted of two periods of three hours Philodryas olfersii (Lichtenstein, 1823), and Bothrops between 0900h-1200h (day) and 1800h-2100h (night), bilineatus bilineatus (Wied, 1821) were observed and through visual surveys (Corn and Bury, 1990; Franco et photographed (but not collected). Specimens of the first al., 2002). Therefore, the sampling effort employed in three species were not collected because we did not each site totalled 54 person-hours (3 people × 6 hours have a collecting permit when they were recorded, while × 3 sampling events). Pitfall traps with drift fences and specimens of the other species escaped during sampling. incidental encounters were not used in the sampling. Voucher specimens (ICMBio/SISBIO #48102-2) Data Analysis. We performed three accumulation were deposited in the Herpetological Collection of curves for (1) lizards, (2) snakes, and (3) all reptile Laboratório de Herpetologia from Universidade Federal species (turtles, crocodilian, lizards, and snakes) in do Amapá (Appendix I). The species conservation a combined analysis using the sample-based method status was based on the IUCN (2020). The taxonomic (Gotelli and Colwell, 2001) through 1000 randomisations nomenclature applied herein follows Costa and Bérnils of an abundance matrix where each column represents (2018). a species and each row represents a sample. We used species richness estimator Jacknife1 to determine the Results expected richness of (1) lizards, (2) snakes, and (3) reptiles combined. This analysis was performed using We recorded a total of 57 reptile species in the study EstimateS v.9.1.0 (Colwell, 2013). Species richness area, including two turtles, one crocodilian, 30 lizards, was calculated using the Menhinick’s index using PAST and 24 snakes (Table 1, Figures 2–5). The number of software (Hammer et al., 2001). species recorded in forest only (considering water Voucher specimens. Specimens were anesthetised environments in primary and secondary forests), in with 5 % lidocaine, fixed with 10 % formalin, and open area only, and in both (forest and open area preserved in 70 % ethanol (Heyer et al., 1994). Sampled environments), accounted for 63.2, 21.1, and 15.7 % of individual of Chelonoidis carbonarius (Spix, 1824), total species sampled, respectively. Of the 57 recorded
Checklist of the reptiles from the Cancão Municipal Natural Park, Brazil 541
Table 1. List of reptiles recorded at Cancão Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil.
Sampled areas: Terra Firme trail at Cancão forest (TC); River Amapari trail (TA). Habitats: Open area (OA); Forest (F); IUCN
Red List Criteria: LC – Least Concern; NE - not evaluated. *First record for the state of Amapá.
Table 1.
Taxon Sampled areas Habitats IUCN
TC TA OA F
TESTUDINES
Testudinidae
Chelonoidis carbonarius (Spix, 1824) X X X NE
Chelidae
Mesoclemmys gibba (Schweigger, 1812)* X X NE
CROCODYLIA
Alligatoridae
Paleosuchus trigonatus (Schneider, 1801) X X LC
SQUAMATA (Lizards)
Gekkonidae
Hemidactylus mabouia (Moreau de Jonnès, 1818) X X X NE
Phyllodactylidae
Thecadactylus rapicauda (Houttuyn, 1782) X X LC
Sphaerodactylidae
Chatogekko amazonicus (Andersson, 1918) X X X LC
Gonatodes humeralis (Guichenot, 1855) X X X LC
Lepidoblepharis heyerorum Vanzolini, 1978 X X X LC
Mabuyidae
Copeoglossum nigropunctatum (Spix, 1825) X X X X LC
Dactyloidae
Dactyloa punctata (Daudin, 1802) X X X NE
Norops auratus (Daudin, 1802) X X X NE
Norops chrysolepis (Duméril and Bibron, 1837) X X NE
Norops fuscoauratus (D’Orbigny, 1837 in Duméril and X X NE
Bibron, 1837)
Norops ortonii (Cope, 1868) X X NE
Iguanidae
Iguana iguana iguana (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X X LC
Polychrotidae
Polychrus marmoratus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
Tropiduridae
Plica plica (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X NE
Plica umbra umbra (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X LC
Uracentron azureum azureum (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X LC
Uranoscodon superciliosus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
Alopoglossidae
Alopoglossus angulatus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
Gymnophthalmidae
Iphisa elegans elegans Gray, 1851 X X LC
Cercosaura aff. argulus Peters, 1863 X X LC
Cercosaura ocellata ocellata Wagler, 1830 X X LC
Neusticurus bicarinatus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
542 Carlos Eduardo Costa-Campos et al.
Table 1. Continued.
Taxon Sampled areas Habitat IUCN
TC TA OA F
Neusticurus rudis Boulenger 1900 X X LC
Arthrosaura kockii (Lidth de Jeude, 1904) X X LC
Loxopholis guianense (Ruibal, 1952) X X X LC
Teiidae
Ameiva ameiva ameiva (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X LC
Cnemidophorus cryptus Cole and Dessauer, 1993 X X X NE
Kentropyx calcarata Spix, 1825 X X X LC
Kentropyx striata (Daudin, 1802) X X X LC
Tupinambis teguixin (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X NE
SQUAMATA (Snakes)
Anomalepididae
Typhlophis squamosus (Schlegel, 1839) X X LC
Aniliidae
Anilius scytale (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
Boidae
Boa constrictor constrictor Linnaeus, 1758 X X NE
Corallus caninus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X LC
Corallus hortulanus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X LC
Colubridae
Chironius exoletus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
Chironius scurrulus (Wagler in Spix, 1824) X X LC
Dendrophidion dendrophis (Schlegel, 1837) X X LC
Leptophis ahaetulla ahaetulla (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
Oxybelis fulgidus (Daudin, 1803) X X X LC
Dipsadidae
Dipsas catesbyi (Sentzen, 1796) X X X LC
Dipsas variegata (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) X X X LC
Sibon nebulatus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X LC
Apostolepis quinquelineata Boulenger, 1896 X X NE
Helicops angulatus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X X LC
Philodryas argentea (Daudin, 1803) X X LC
Philodryas olfersii (Lichtenstein, 1823) X X LC
Oxyrhopus melanogenys melanogenys (Tschudi, 1845) X X LC
Pseudoboa coronata Schneider, 1801* X X LC
Siphlophis compressus (Daudin, 1803) X X X LC
Erythrolamprus miliaris miliaris (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
Elapidae
Micrurus lemniscatus lemniscatus (Linnaeus, 1758) X X LC
Viperidae
Bothrops bilineatus bilineatus (Wied, 1821) X X NE
Bothrops atrox (Linnaeus, 1758) X X X X NE
Checklist of the reptiles from the Cancão Municipal Natural Park, Brazil 543 Figure 2. Reptiles recorded in Cancão Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil. A) Chelonoidis carbonarius; B) Mesoclemmys gibba; C) Paleosuchus trigonatus; D) Hemidactylus mabouia; E) Thecadactylus rapicauda; F) Chatogekko amazonicus; G) Gonatodes humeralis; H) Lepidoblepharis heyerorum; I) Copeoglossum nigropunctatum; J) Dactyloa punctata; K) Norops auratus; L) Norops chrysolepis; M) Norops fuscoauratus; N) Norops ortonii; O) Iguana iguana iguana.
544 Carlos Eduardo Costa-Campos et al. Figure 3. Reptiles recorded in Cancão Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil. A) Polychrus marmoratus; B) Plica plica; C) Plica umbra umbra; D) Uracentron azureum azureum; E) Uranoscodon superciliosus; F) Alopoglossus angulatus; G) Iphisa elegans elegans; H) Cercosaura aff. argulus; I) Cercosaura ocellata ocellata; J) Neusticurus bicarinatus; K) Neusticurus rudis; L) Arthrosaura kockii; M) Loxopholis guianense; N) Ameiva ameiva ameiva; O) Cnemidophorus cryptus.
Checklist of the reptiles from the Cancão Municipal Natural Park, Brazil 545 Figure 4. Reptiles recorded in Cancão Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil. A) Kentropyx calcarata; B) Kentropyx striata; C) Tupinanbis teguixin (Photo by Girlan Dias); D) Typhlophis squamosus; E) Anilius scytale; F) Boa constrictor constrictor; G) Corallus caninus; H) Corallus hortulanus; I) Chironius exoletus; J) Chironius scurrulus; K) Dendrophidion dendrophis; L) Leptophis ahaetulla ahaetulla; M) Oxybelis fulgidus; N) Dipsas catesbyi; O) Dipsas variegata.
546 Carlos Eduardo Costa-Campos et al. Figure 5. Reptiles recorded in Cancão Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil. A) Sibon nebulatus; B) Apostolepis quinquelineata; C) Helicops angulatus; D) Philodryas argentea; E) Philodryas olfersii (Photo by Kurazo Okada); F) Oxyrhopus melanogenys melanogenys; G) Pseudoboa coronata; H) Siphlophis compressus; I) Erythrolamprus miliaris miliaris; J) Micrurus lemniscatus lemniscatus; K) Bothrops atrox. species, 42 were assigned as least concern (LC) by IUCN (Sanches et al., 2020; Tavares-Pinheiro et al., 2021). Red List criteria, and 15 have not been evaluated (NE) Based on the Jackknife1 estimator, the rarefaction (IUCN, 2020). Mesoclemmys gibba (Schweigger, 1812) curve implies on a species richness of 36.3 lizard species, and Pseudoboa coronata Schneider, 1801 represents 35.7 snake species, and 76.8 reptile fauna combined. As the first record of these species for the state of Amapá none of the curves reached asymptote, we believe that
Checklist of the reptiles from the Cancão Municipal Natural Park, Brazil 547
the area should harbour more reptile species than we rarefaction curve for snake species was still rising. We
recorded here (Figure 6). did not collect at least six snake species which are widely
Menhinick’s Index revealed that Terra Firme trail at distributed in the Amazonia domain and commonly
Cancão forest (6.56) had higher richness compared to known in Amapá: Epicrates cenchria (Linnaeus, 1758),
the River Amapari trail (6.00). In addition, forest habitats Eunectes deschauenseei Dunn & Conant, 1936, Lachesis
(6.71) had higher species richness value compared to muta (Linnaeus, 1766), Micrurus surinamensis (Cuvier,
open areas (4.58). 1817), Chironius fuscus (Linnaeus, 1758), and Dipsas
indica Laurenti, 1768. All these species are presumed to
Discussion occur in the studied area (Campos et al., 2015; Nogueira
et al., 2019; Prudente et al., 2020).
The local richness of lizards we found for the study area
As observed in other studies encompassing the
(30 species) is consistent with other studies performed in
Amazonia domain, we found a higher species richness
the Brazilian Amazonia, which has recorded a minimum
in forested habitats (Ávila-Pires et al., 2009; Ávila-
local richness of 22 lizard species and a maximum of
Pires et al., 2010; Nogueira et al., 2019), although some
44 species per inventory area (Ávila-Pires et al., 2009;
species were also associated, exclusively or not, with
Ávila-Pires et al., 2010; Prudente et al., 2013). Here,
open areas, such as Copeoglossum nigropunctatum,
the family Gymnophthalmidae had the highest species
richness (seven species, 23.3 % of the total), followed by
Teiidae (five, 16.7 %) and Tropiduridae (four, 13.3 %).
The pattern of higher numbers of lizard species recorded
for Gymnophthalmidae and Teiidae is common in the
Amazon rainforest (Prudente et al., 2013; Ribeiro-Júnior
and Amaral, 2017; Peixoto et al., 2019). Among snakes,
Dipsadidae was the most diverse, with 11 species (45.8
% of the total number), followed by Colubridae (five
species, 20.8 %) and Boidae (three species, 12.5 %). A
large number of dipsadid snakes have also been reported
in several studies in the Amazon domain (Santos-Costa
et al., 2015; Nogueira et al., 2019).
The Cancão Municipal Natural Park (CMNP) reptile
assemblage is composed of a mix of forest and open
area species and represents 34.8 % of the reptile species
found in the state of Amapá (Costa and Bérnils, 2018).
In our list, one taxon (i.e., Cercosaura aff. argulus) has
uncertainty in terms of its identification, due to some
taxonomic issues, which may indicate a need for further
taxonomic revisions. The richness of reptiles at the
CMNP is high when compared to other inventories in
state of Amapá: Fazendinha Environmental Protection
Area (23 lizard species; Campos et al., 2015), and in
areas of dense and open forest in the Tumucumaque
Mountains National Park (34 species; Lima, 2008). In
the CMNP, most reptile species (36 species, 63.2 %)
were found only in forested environments, whereas
eight species (14 %) are widely distributed in both
environments (open area and forest). Regarding the
geographic distribution of the species sampled, most of Figure 6. Sample-based rarefaction curves estimated for
them (68.4 %) are widely distributed in Amazonia or reptile species with the Jackknife1 estimator for Cancão
can exceed the range out of Amazonia to other biomes. Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, state
None of the three rarefaction curves reached the of Amapá, Brazil. A) Lizards, B) snakes, and C) all reptiles
asymptote. Despite the large number of species, the combined (turtles, crocodilian, lizards, and snakes).548 Carlos Eduardo Costa-Campos et al.
Helicops angulatus, and Bothrops atrox. Many reptile in Parque Estadual do Utinga, a protected area surrounded by
species found in our study are frequently associated urbanization. Herpetology Notes 11: 499–512.
Ávila-Pires, T.C.S., Prudente, A.L.C. (2019): The biodiversity
with anthropogenic habitats, such as the exotic gekkonid
census: reptiles. Available at: http://www.museu-goeldi.br/
Hemidactylus mabouia and the native lizards Iguana censo/. Accessed on 23 August 2019.
iguana iguana, Ameiva ameiva ameiva, Cercosaura Azevedo-Ramos, C., Galatti, U. (2002): Patterns of amphibian
ocellata ocellata, Cnemidophorus cryptus, as well as diversity in brazilian Amazonia: conservation implications.
the snakes Typhlophis squamosus, and Boa constrictor Biological Conservation 103: 103–111.
constrictor. Benício, R.A., Lima, J.D. (2017): Anurans of Amapá National
Our results suggest that CMNP has a relatively high Forest, Eastern Amazonia, Brazil. Herpetology Notes 10: 627–
633.
local species richness, which is representative of the
Campos, C.E.C., Lima, J.D., Lima, J.R.F. (2015): Riqueza e
reptile diversity in the Brazilian Amazon. This paper composição de répteis Squamata (lagartos e anfisbenas) da Área
provides the first official list of reptiles for Cancão de Proteção Ambiental da Fazendinha, Amapá, Brasil. Biota
Municipal Natural Park. Our findings complement the Amazônia 5: 84–90.
available information about the distribution and richness Colwell, R.K. 2013. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species
of species that compose the herpetofauna of Amazonia. Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 9.
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of
Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. Available at: http://purl.
Acknowledgments. We are grateful to Ronildo Benício who
oclc.org/estimates. Accessed 29 April 2020.
provided useful suggestions on an earlier version of this Corn, P.S., Bury, R.B. (1990): Sampling methods for terrestrial
manuscript and pre-peer-review; colleagues of “Laboratório amphibians and reptiles. General Technical Report. Portland,
de Herpetologia” for support during our field work; Instituto OR, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) for Northwest Research Station.
providing collection permits (SISBIO #48102-2) and Prefeitura Costa, H.C., Bérnils, R.S. (2018): Répteis do Brasil e suas unidades
Municipal de Serra do Navio for authorising us to conduct the federativas: lista de espécies. Herpetologia Brasileira 7: 11–57.
research in the Cancão Municipal Natural Park. We thank Pró- Costa-Campos, C.E., Freire, E.M.X. (2019): Richness and
Reitoria de Ensino de Graduação, Universidade Federal do composition of anuran assemblages from an Amazonian
Amapá (UNIFAP) and Christopher Jaster (PARNA Montanhas savanna. ZooKeys 843: 149–169.
do Tumucumaque) for logistical support during the fieldwork. Debien, I.V., Waldez, F., Menin, M. (2019): Diversity of reptiles
in flooded and unflooded forests of the Amanã Sustainable
References Development Reserve, central Amazonia. Herpetology Notes
12: 1051–1065.
Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Sentelhas, P.C., Gonçalves, J.L.M., Dias, T.C.A.C., Cunha, A.C., Silva, J.M.C. (2016): Return on
Sparovek. G. (2013): Köppen’s climate classification map for investment of the ecological infrastructure in a new forest
Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22: 711–728. frontier in Brazilian Amazonia. Biological Conservation 194:
Araújo, A.S., Costa-Campos, C.E. (2014): Anurans of the Reserva 184–193
Biológica do Parazinho, Municipality of Macapá, state of Drummond, J.A., Dias, T.C.A. C., Brito, D.M.C. (2008): Atlas
Amapá, eastern Amazon. Check List 10: 1414–1419. das Unidades de Conservação do Estado do Amapá. Macapá,
Ávila-Pires, T.C.S., Hoogmoed, M.S., Vitt, L.J. (2007): Amapá, MMA/IBAMA/GEA/SEMA.
Herpetofauna da Amazônia. In: Herpetologia no Brasil II, p. Fonseca, W.L., da Silva, J.D., Abegg, A.D., da Rosa, C.M.,
13–43. Nascimento, L.B., Oliveira, M.E., Eds., Belém, Brazil, Bernarde, P.S. (2019): Herpetofauna of Porto Walter and
Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia. surrounding areas, Southwest Amazonia, Brazil. Herpetology
Ávila-Pires, T.C.S., Vitt, L.J., Sartorius, S.S., Zanim P.A. (2009): Notes 12: 91–107.
Squamata (Reptilia) from four sites in southern Amazonia, with Franco, F.L., Salomão, M.G., Auricchio, P. (2002). Répteis. In:
a biogeographic analysis of Amazonian lizards. Boletim do Técnicas de coleta e preparação: vertebrados, p. 75–115.
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Naturais 4: 99–118. Auricchio, P., Salomão, M.G. Eds., São Paulo, Brasil, Instituto
Ávila-Pires, T.C.S., Hoogmoed, M.S., Rocha, W.A. (2010): Notes Pau Brasil.
on the vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of Frazão, L., Oliveira, M.E., Menin, M., Campos, J., Almeida, A.,
the Guianan Region, I. Herpetofauna. Publicações avulsas do Kaefer, I.L., Hrbek, T. (2020): Species richness and composition
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 5: 13–112. of snake assemblages in poorly accessible areas in the Brazilian
Ávila-Pires, T.C., Alves-Silva, K.R., Barbosa, L., Correa, F.S., Amazonia. Biota Neotropica 20: e20180661.
Cosenza, J.F., Costa-Rodrigues, A.P.V., Cronemberger, A.A., Freitas, M.A., Venâncio, N.M., Abegg, A.D., dos Santos
Hoogmoed, M.S., Lima-Filho, G.R., Maciel, A.O., Missassi, Azevedo, W., de Oliveira Pereira, V., Zanotti, A.P., Veloso, A.,
A.F.R., Nascimento, L.R.S., Nunes, A.L.S., Oliveira, L.S., Schwarzbach, L., Oliveira e Sousa, A.G., Cruz-da-Silva, R.C.,
Palheta, G.S., Pereira Jr., A. J. S., Pinheiro, L., Santos-Costa, de Amorim, V.R.G., de Moura, G.J.B. (2020): Herpetofauna at
M.C., Pinho, S.R.C., Silva, F.M., Silva, M.B., Sturaro, M.J. the Rio Acre Ecological Station, Amazon Rainforest, Brazil.
(2018): Changes in amphibian and reptile diversity over time Herpetology Notes: 13: 33–48.Checklist of the reptiles from the Cancão Municipal Natural Park, Brazil 549 Gotelli, N.J., Colwell, R.K. (2001): Quantifying biodiversity: Queiroz, S.S., Silva, A.R., Reis, F.M., Lima, J.D., Lima, J.R.F. procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of (2011): Anfíbios de uma área de castanhal da Reserva Extrativista species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379–391. do Rio Cajari, Amapá. Biota Amazônia 1: 1–18. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., Ryan, P.D. (2001): PAST: Ribeiro-Júnior, M.A., Amaral, S. (2017): Catalogue of distribution Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) from the Brazilian Amazonia. IV. Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1–9. Available Alopoglossidae, Gymnophthalmidae. Zootaxa 4269: 151–196. at: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm. Sanches, P.R., Pedroso-Santos, F., Figueiredo, V.A.M.B., Tavares- Accessed 23 May 2020. Pinheiro, R., Costa-Campos, C.E. (2020): New record of Heyer, W.R., Donnelly, M.A., Mcdiarmid, R.W., Hayek, L.A.C., Mesoclemmys gibba (Schweigger, 1812) (Testudines, Chelidae) Foster, M.S. (1994): Measuring and Monitoring Biological for the state of Amapá,northern Brazil. Herpetology Notes 13: Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Biological 947–949. Diversity Handbook Series. Washington, Smithsonian Institution Santos-Costa, M.C., Maschio, G.F., Prudente, A.L.C. (2015): Press. Natural history of snakes from Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã, Hilário, R.R., Toledo, J.J., Mustin, K., Castro, I.J., Costa-Neto, eastern Amazonia, Brazil. Herpetology Notes 8: 69–98. S.V., Kauano, E.E, Eilers, V., Vasconcelos, I.M., Mendes- Silva-e-Silva, Y.B., Costa-Campos, C.E. (2018): Anuran species Junior, R.N., Funi, C., Fearnside, P.M., Silva, J.M.C., Euler, composition of Cancão Municipal Natural Park, Municipality of A.M.C., Carvalho, W.D. (2017): The fate of an Amazonian Serra do Navio, Amapá state, Brazil. ZooKeys 762: 131–148. Savanna: government land-use planning endangers sustainable SNUC, 2000. Lei nº 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000; Decreto nº development in Amapá, the most protected brazilian state. 4.340, de 22 de agosto de 2002. Sistema Nacional de Unidade de Tropical Conservation Science 10: 1–8. Conservação da Natureza – SNUC. 3. ed. Brasília, MMA, SBF. IUCN (2020). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version Tavares-Pinheiro, R., Figueiredo, V.A.M.B., Pedroso-Santos, 2020-1. Available at: https:������������������������������������ F., Sanches, P.R., Sousa, J.C., Costa-Campos, C.E. (2021): 21 April 2020. Pseudoboa coronata Schneider, 1801 (Squamata, Colubridae): Lima, J.D. (2008): A herpetofauna do Parque Nacional do Filling a gap in the geographic distribution. Herpetology Notes Montanhas do Tumucumaque, Amapá, Brasil, Expedições I 14: 497–498. a V. In: Inventários Biológicos Rápidos no Parque Nacional Montanhas do Tumucumaque, Amapá, Brasil, p. 38–50. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment, 48. Bernard, E., Ed., Arlington, VA, Conservation International. Lima, J.R.F., Lima, J.D., Lima, S.D., Silva, R.B.L., Andrade, G.V. (2017): Amphibians found in the Amazonian Savanna of the Rio Curiaú Environmental Protection Area in Amapá, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 17: e20160252. Nogueira, C., Argolo, A., Arzamendia, V., Azevedo, J., Barbo, F., Bérnils, R., Bolochio, B., Borges-Martins, M., Godinho, M.B. De., Braz, H., Buononato, M., Cisneros-Heredia, D., Colli, G., Costa, H., Franco, F., Giraudo, A., Castellari Gonzalez, R., Guedes, T., Hoogmoed, M., Martins, M. (2019): Atlas of Brazilian Snakes: Verified Point-Locality Maps to Mitigate the Wallacean Shortfall in a Megadiverse Snake Fauna. South American Journal of Herpetology 14: 1–274. Peixoto, G., Leitão, P., Kaefer, I.L., Lima, A.P. (2019): The lizards along the road BR-319 in the Purus-Madeira interfluve, Brazilian Amazonia (Squamata, Lacertilia). Herpetology Notes 12: 689–697. Pereira-Júnior, A.P., Costa-Campos, C.E., Araújo, A.S. (2013): Composição e diversidade de anfíbios anuros do campus da Universidade Federal do Amapá. Biota Amazônia 3: 13–21. Prudente, A.L.C., Silva, F.M., Menks, A., Melo, J.F. (2013): Checklist of Lizards of the Juruti, state of Pará, Brazil. Check List 9: 42–50. Prudente, A.L.C., Sarmento, J.F.M., Costa, K.K.C., Dourado, A.C.M., Santos, M.M., Lima, J.R.F., Lima, J.D., Galatti, U. (2020). Serra do Navio, Guiana Shield lowland area, Brazil: a region with high diversity of Squamata. Cuadernos de Herpetología 34: 00-00.
550 Carlos Eduardo Costa-Campos et al.
Appendix. Voucher specimens collected at the Cancão
Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio,
Amapá state, Brazil and deposited at the Herpetological
Collection of Laboratório de Herpetologia from
Universidade Federal do Amapá.
Squamata (Lizards) - Hemidactylus mabouia
CECC 2448; Thecadactylus rapicauda CECC 3221;
Chatogekko amazonicus CECC 3253; Gonatodes
humeralis CECC 2449; Lepidoblepharis heyerorum
CECC 2940; Copeoglossum nigropunctatum CECC
2967; Dactyloa punctata CECC 2450; Norops auratus
CECC 3222; Norops chrysolepis CECC 2952; Norops
fuscoauratus CECC 3446; Norops ortonii CECC
2451; Iguana iguana iguana CECC 2452; Polychrus
marmoratus CECC 2453; Plica plica CECC 3220;
Plica umbra umbra CECC 3511; Uracentron azureum
azureum CECC 2454; Uranoscodon superciliosus
CECC 3490; Alopoglossus angulatus CECC 2455;
Iphisa elegans elegans CECC 2456; Cercosaura aff.
argulus CECC 3480; Cercosaura ocellata ocellata
CECC 2457; Neusticurus bicarinatus CECC 3321;
Neusticurus rudis CECC 2472; Arthrosaura kockii
CECC 2458; Loxopholis guianense CECC 3314;
Ameiva ameiva ameiva CECC 2459; Cnemidophorus
cryptus CECC 2473; Kentropyx calcarata CECC 2474;
Kentropyx striata CECC 2475; Tupinanbis teguixin
CECC 3444.
Squamata (Snakes) - Typhlophis squamosus
CECC 2476; Anilius scytale CECC; Boa constrictor
constrictor CECC 2477; Corallus hortulanus CECC
3295; Chironius exoletus CECC 2478; Chironius
scurrulus CECC 2479; Dendrophidion dendrophis
CECC 2480; Leptophis ahaetulla ahaetulla CECC
3297; Oxybelis fulgidus CECC 2481; Dipsas catesbyi
CECC 2482; Apostolepis quinquelineata CECC 2483;
Helicops angulatus CECC 1881; Philodryas argentea
CECC 2484; Oxyrhopus melanogenys melanogenys
CECC 2485; Pseudoboa coronata CECC; Siphlophis
compressus CECC 2486; Erythrolamprus miliaris
miliaris CECC 2487; Micrurus lemniscatus lemniscatus
CECC 2488 Bothrops atrox CECC 3299.
Accepted by Fábio HeppYou can also read
