Competition Participant Packet - HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY PARTICIPATION PACKET - Vital Link

Page created by George Blake
 
CONTINUE READING
2014 - 2015 UCI PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING PROJECT
 2020HIGH
      – 2021  RESCUE
          SCHOOL         ROBOTICSPACKET
                 ENTRY PARTICIPATION DESIGN
     Competition Participant Packet

      UCI Performance Engineering Program Managers
      Professor Michael McCarthy, UCI Henry Samuel School of Engineering
      Dr. Brian Dozer, Vital Link
OVERVIEW
The program is a collaboration with UCI, Vital Link and the Orange County School Districts. The mission is to provide STEM education
in a hands-on, classroom/project-based learning environment through student participation in a Rescue Robotics Program and
Competition. The program is open to middle school, high school, and college teams.

The program will help students display computer programing skills, as well as skills in analysis, research and testing, and
personnel/cost management that is integrated into the classroom curriculum. During the development phase teams will build
ground robot, aerial robot, or fixed wing rescue robots using open source material resources which may include: Arduino, Raspberry
PI, servo motors, smartphones, Robot OC, Cloud storage on competition day. Using maps, GPS devices and power of deduction,
robots will navigate through a natural outdoor environment to locate and record x and y coordinates on a 200 x 200 foot grid. The
team that records the most accurate coordinates at the end of the period will be recognized.

Donations, grants, and team entry fees provide funding for the overall program.

SCOPE
The program is open to middle school, high school, and college teams.
Criteria for selection to participate:
RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPATING TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS FOR 2020-2021:
   Identify a teacher representative for the team and a senior administrator representative. These are the people who will receive
    announcements and notices of meetings and who will attend meetings on behalf of your vehicle/team entry or who will find a
    qualified substitute to attend the meetings. These people will be identified as your organization’s primary contact with the. UCI
    Rescue Robotics Management Team.

   Attend at least four planning meetings with a mentor of the design engineering industry. This mentor is someone who will be
    able to provide assistance and detailed entry progress as well as report back to you on important program participation and
    technical details. You must email your confirmed meeting mentor dates to (Autumn@vitallinkoc.org).

   Attend at least one meeting a month with the college mentor to provide assistance and detailed entry progress discussed with
    design engineering industry mentor.

   Commit to being an active and contributing participant in the Rescue Robotics Competition, attending meetings, sharing ideas
    and/or resources.

    Mandatory submission of both Design Brief and Design Video.

    Complete Online Registration in order to be eligible to participate. (See “Rules Overview” for registration link)

   Provide a support letter from a senior administrator. Submit by email to Autumn Gekko (Autumn@vitallinkoc.org). Sample
    attached

   Submit all requested forms/documentation (waivers, code of conduct, photo release, and design documents) by
    Friday, January 29, 2021 and submit them to Vital Link before/by Friday, April 2, 2021.

   Comply with all project and participation rules.

            For more information about participation contact: Autumn Gekko, Autumn@vitallinkoc.org

                                                                                                                                   2
ADMINISTRATOR SUPPORT LETTER

Date

Dear UCI Rescue Robotics Management Committee,

I am writing to express my support for,                                                       [School Name] to become a
participant in the 2020 - 2021 UCI Rescue Robotics Competition. This participation will provide a unique and engaging
STEM hands-on student activity related to programming and robotics.

As a participant,                                                           [School District] will play a vital role in the
support of our students and teacher(s) and their participation in this program. With this participation, we also agree to
attend required meetings in advance of the Rescue Robotics Competition or send a designated representative and also
meet all robotic and safety requirements as presented by the organizers of this program.

I strongly support this participation, as it represents a positive contribution to the field of STEM education. I have
appointed                                          [Teacher] to act as our Institutional Representative to carry out the
responsibilities associated with the UCI Rescue Robotics Competition and to keep our institution aware of associated
activities.

Signed,

Name

Title

                                                                                                                              3
ELIGIBILITY
Middle school and/or high school student participants that are currently enrolled in a public or private school or be a home-schooled middle school
or high school student.
Any student who has already graduated from high school may not be on a high school team, but can mentor that team.
College and graduate student participants must be currently enrolled in a 2-year or 4 year college or University. If they have   already graduated
and are no longer enrolled, they may “mentor” a team.

REGISTRATION AND ENTRY FEE
Register online: TYPEFORM HERE Due: Friday, December 18, 2020
Teams roster submitted online to Autumn Gekko at Autumn@vitallinkoc.org by Friday, January 22, 2021.

The Entry Fee for 2020-2021 is $1,800.00. Each additional vehicle will have a $250 fee. (Example: total fee for school with 1 robot is $1,800.
School with 2 robots is $2,050). Deadline for Entry Fee: Friday, January 22, 2021.

MEMBERSHIP
Upon receipt of the Registration Form and Entry Fee Payment, teams will be considered members of the UCI Rescue Robotics Competition. In
order to participate in any of the programs, teams must be members in good standing.

WITHDRAWAL
Any team that withdraws from Project participation or any program, must provide written notice as soon as possible to Neda Arab,
Neda@vitallinkoc.org.

**In order to receive a refund of the entry fee, withdrawal from competition must be made before Friday, February 26, 2021. Any team who
withdraws after this date will not be refunded the entry fee**

OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS
All teams are required to read and follow official rules and announcements regarding the program. These announcements will be sent to the
designated faculty team leader.

DESIGN BRIEF AND DESIGN VIDEO
A written design brief and video presentation must be emailed to Autumn, Autumn@vitallinkoc.org by Sunday, March 21, 2021 by 11:59 PM. The
Design Brief should be at least 8 pages of written information with additional pictures or sketches of robot. The team Design Video must be
between 2:50 – 3:00 minutes long. All Design Videos must be uploaded to YouTube, made public, and shared with Autumn@vitallinkoc.org by
Sunday, March 21, 2021 by 11:59 PM. Each team must present their PowerPoint Presentation online to a panel of industry professionals on a
provided platform on Wednesday, April 21, 2021.
See P. 7-10 for Design Brief & Design PowerPoint Presentation information on guidelines, rubric, and list of award levels

                                                                                                                                                     4
OFFICIAL RULES CONT
FACULTY TEAM LEAD
     Each team must have a Faculty Team Lead assigned to their team. This advisor must fulfill their duties listed below in order to
      maintain team eligibility. All teams are required to read and respond to announcements/requests for information that are
      sent to the Faculty Team Lead.
     Attend all Project meetings for Faculty Team Leads during the school year. If unable to attend, a representative for the advisor
      must attend in their place.
     Submit the Administrative Support Letter (Signed by Dean, Principal, or CTE Director). Email to Autumn Gekko,
      Autumn@vitallinkoc.org
     Agree to abide by all decisions of the Rescue Robotics Competition Management Team and the Administrative Advisory Panel.
     Act as a role model to students
     Advise team on general engineering theory and fabrication skill development but the faculty advisor may not create any part
      of the Design Brief presentation and related documents.
     Witness original parent and guardian signatures and sign to that effect on the Waiver of Liability forms.
     Adhere to the “RESPONSIBILITES OF PARTICIPATING TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS FOR 2020-2021” found on Page 3 of
      this booklet.

MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY
As the organizers of the project, Vital Link OC reserves the right to revise the program schedule and/or to interpret the program
rules at any time and in any manner, which is their sole judgment, required for efficient operation or safety of the program.

ADMINISTRATIVE ADVISORY PANEL
The Administrative Advisory Panel will include administrators from the districts and ROP’s of participating teams. They will advise
the Rescue Robotics Competition Management Team on project direction, possible changes, and issues brought to them related to
the programs.

                                                                                                                                      5
IMPORTANT DATES

Date                     Time           Location                 What

Friday, November         2:30 pm – 4:00 Provided Zoom Link       Administrator’s Meeting
13TH, 2020               pm
MANDATORY

Tuesday, November        4:30 pm – 6:00 Provided Zoom Link       Orientation/ Teacher’s Meeting
17th, 2020               pm
MANDATORY

Friday, December 18,     End of Day     Autumn@vitallinkoc.org   Official Registration and Administrator Support Letter Due
2020

Friday, January 22nd ,   End of Day     Payments to Vital Link   Registration Fees Due
2021

Friday, February 26th,   5:00 pm        Neda@vitallinkoc.org     Final day to withdrawal from competition in order to receive a
2021                                                             fee refund

Sunday, March 21st,      Midnight       Google Drive/YouTube     Final Day to submit Design Brief & Design PowerPoint
2021                                    Links                    Presentation. All links should be emailed to Aurea Lawson at
MANDATORY                                                        Autumn@vitallinkoc.org.

Friday, April 23rd, 2021 9:00am -       Provided Zoom Link       Design Review Presentation Date – All teams will present to a
                         1:00pm                                  panel of judges and industry professionals.
MANDATORY

                                    For more information or questions contact:
                                      Autumn Gekko, Autumn@vitallinkoc.org

                                                                                                                                  6
Design Review Guidelines
DESIGN BRIEF SUBMISSION – Sunday, March 21, 2021                       DESIGN VIDEO SUBMISSION - Sunday, March 21,
 A written Design Brief must be submitted electronically by March      2021
26, 2021. This is four weeks before the March 21st - Design            A Design Presentation must be submitted electronically by March
Presentation. A written design brief and video presentation must       26, 2021. This is four weeks before the March 21st - Design
be emailed to Autumn Gekko, Autumn@vitallinkoc.org by Sunday,          Presentation. The team Design Video must be between 2:50 – 3:00
March 21, 2021 by 11:59 PM. The Design Brief should be at least 8      minutes long. All Design Videos must be uploaded to YouTube, made
pages of written information with additional pictures or sketches of   public, and shared with Autumn@vitallinkoc.org by Sunday, March
robot. Engineering Graduate students will score your Design Brief      21, 2021 by 11:59 PM. Each team must present their PowerPoint
based on elements in the Design Brief Scoring Rubric.                  Presentation online to a panel of industry professionals on a
The following topics must be covered in the Design                     provided platform on Friday, April 23, 2021. Presentations will be
                                                                       scored along with you Design Brief based on elements in the Design
Brief:
                                                                       Brief Scoring Rubric.
    1. Faculty and College Mentor Advisor(s)
                                                                       The following topics must be covered in the Design Video:
    2. Industry Advisor(s) and Background                                   1. Faculty and College Mentor Advisor(s)
    3. Schedule of Meetings with Advisors and Mentors                       2. Team Members/Titles/Assignments
                                                                            3. Basic Robot Configuration & Description
    4. Team Members/Titles/Assignments                                      4. Video uploaded to YouTube, must be made “Public” and no
    5. Organization Chart & Subsystem Team Responsibilities                      copyright context.
                                                                            5. All videos must be between 2:50 – 3:00 minutes
    6.    Robot Vehicle Design
    7.    Robot System Organization and Communication
    8.    Navigation and Search Strategy                               DESIGN POWERPOINT PRESENTATION – Friday,
    9.    Sensors and Survivor Verification                            APRIL 23, 2021
    10.   Design Drawings & Parts List                                 Teams will present for mentors and industry professionals
    11.   Performance Evaluation – Vehicle weight, ground              on a provided Zoom Link.
          speed, survivor verification cycle time.
    12.   Timeline, To Do List, Assembly & Finish Plan                 RECOGNITION & SCORING
    13.   Description of Marketing and Advisor Outreach                     1. Written Design Brief and video (at least 8 pages, not
    14.   What challenges has your team faced and how have                     including photo pages). This accounts for 60% of the team
          you overcome these challenges?                                       score.
    15.   Why do you think your system will win?                            2. Design PowerPoint Presentation will account for 40% of the
    16.   Additional items (in the Appendix) - pictures,                       team score.
                                                                            3. All scores are based on the Design Review Presentation
          marketing materials, etc.
                                                                               Rubric.

                                                                       RECOGNITION
                                                                       Top teams will be recognized:

                                                                       1st, 2nd & 3rd Place – (ground)
                                                                       1st, 2nd & 3rd Place – (aerial)
                                                                       1st, 2nd & 3rd Place – (multi-bot)

                                                                                                                                        7
Design Presentation Organizer
 Process Criteria                                                 Team Member      Notes
                                                                  Responsibility
 Goal: the goal of the project and system requirements. One
 sentence goal statement, measurable system requirements
 Background: overview of system design. Deconstruct the
 system into subsystems; provide drawings, photographs
 and experiments if any.
 Team Organization: present the organization chart.
 Identify subsystem teams and team leads, explain how
 design trade-offs are managed.
 Subsystem Presentation: describe each subsystem design
      A. Subsystem A - goal, block diagram, functions and
          interfaces, hardware and software components
      B. Subsystem B – goal, block diagram, functions and
          interfaces, hardware and software components
 List of Software and Hardware Module Assembly Plan:
 provide list of assemblies, list of fabricated parts, list of
 purchased parts and total estimated cost. Define software
 modules downloaded or written. Outline a assembly
 process and estimate the cost and time to a finished
 product.
 Describe the results, innovation & business opportunity:
 identify the feature or features that distinguish this product
 from the competition. Describe the target market, its size
 and location and estimate a sales price and volume.
 Plan: describe the plan and schedule for next phase

 Summary & Team Photo

NOTES:

                                                                                           8
Design Presentation Rubric
Reviewer:                                                                 School/Team:

                                    NOT YET             SOMEWHAT          SUCCESSFUL:        VERY               TOTAL   COMMENTS
                                    SUCCESSFUL:         SUCCESSFUL:       5-6 points         SUCCESSFUL:        SCORE
                                     0-2 points         3-4 points                           7 points
        INFORMATION: Faculty        Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
        Advisor, Industry           detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
        Advisor/Background,         information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
        Team Members, Titles,                           provided and      could be more
   1
        Assignments,                                    needs more        comprehensive
        Organization Chart and                          detail
        Subsystem Team
        Responsibilities
        Basic Robot Configuration   Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
        and Description             detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
                                    information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
   2
                                                        provided and      could be more
                                                        needs more        comprehensive
                                                        detail
        Robot System                Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
        Organization and            detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
        Communication               information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
   3
                                                        provided and      could be more
                                                        needs more        comprehensive
                                                        detail
        Navigation and Search       Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
        Strategy                    detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
                                    information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
   4
                                                        provided and      could be more
                                                        needs more        comprehensive
                                                        detail
        Sensors and Survivor        Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
        Verification Description    detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
                                    information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
   5                                                    provided and      could be more
                                                        needs more        comprehensive
                                                        detail
        Design Drawings and         Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
        Parts List                  detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
                                    information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
   6                                                    provided and      could be more
                                                        needs more        comprehensive
                                                        detail
        Performance Verification    Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
        (Vehicle weight,            detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
        estimated ground/air        information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
   7
        speed, survivor                                 provided and      could be more
        verification cycle time).                       needs more        comprehensive
                                                        detail
        Design Drawings and         Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
        Parts List                  detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
                                    information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
   8
                                                        provided and      could be more
                                                        needs more        comprehensive
                                                        detail

                                                                                                                                   9
Performance Evaluations       Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
     (weight, center of gravity,   detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
     acceleration time, skid       information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
 9
     pad time, energy usage)                           provided and      could be more
                                                       needs more        comprehensive
                                                       detail
     Timeline, To Do List,         Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
     Assembly and Finish Plan      detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
                                   information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
10
                                                       provided and      could be more
                                                       needs more        comprehensive
                                                       detail
     Description of Marketing      Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
     and Advisor Outreach          detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
                                   information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
11
                                                       provided and      could be more
                                                       needs more        comprehensive
                                                       detail
     Description of Challenges     Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
     Faced and How They            detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
     Were Overcome                 information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
12
                                                       provided and      could be more
                                                       needs more        comprehensive
                                                       detail
     Details of Why This Team      Lacks significant   Good effort but   Well done, but     Complete,
     Thinks They Will Win          detail and          minimal           has minor          comprehensive
                                   information         information       deficiencies and   and well-written
13                                                     provided and      could be more
                                                       needs more        comprehensive
                                                       detail
     Format, Structure,
14   Grammar, Spelling(circle
     a score)                      0-1 point           2 points          3 points           4-5 points

15   Appendix: pictures,
     marketing materials           1 point             2 points          3 points           4 points

                                                                                                       TOTAL
OVERALL COMMENTS:

        For more information about participation contact: Autumn Gekko, Autumn@vitallinkoc.org

                                                                                                               10
You can also read