CONSULTANT SELECTION TEAM (CST) SCORING & HOW CSTS ARE FORMED - 2018 PEPS Conference Raul Ortega, P.E.
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CONSULTANT SELECTION
TEAM (CST) SCORING &
HOW CSTS ARE FORMED
2018 PEPS Conference
Raul Ortega, P.E.
November 27, 2018
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018
Presentation Topics
1 How CST members are formed
2 How the scoring process works
a State Process
b Federal Process
3 How the scoring criteria is developed
4 What CST members look for in a good response
5 Questions and Discussion
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 2
How CST members are formed 2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 3
How CST members are formed
Districts/Divisions
Districts/Divisions Fiscal Year
Subject Matter
contracting needs Procurement Plan
Experts (SME’s)
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 4
CST requirements
Selection Team • Lead CST - TxDOT PM
consists of: • At least two other TxDOT SMEs
• Engineering Contracts – Professional Engineer
• Surveying Contracts – Professional Engineer or
Requirements Registered Professional Land Surveyor
• Architectural Contracts – Registered Architect
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 5
PEPS Procurement Engineer (PcE) as CST option
•Optional role – serving as a
CST member
•subject matter expertise
PEPS •if the CST only has two other
Procurement members
Engineer •if a CST member cannot
complete the procurement
(originally a CST of 3)
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 6
Non-CST support SMEs not on the CST help develop: • Non-listed categories (NLC) • Scope • Request for Qualifications (RFQ) interview questions • Request for Proposal (RFP) topics • Criteria 2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 7
How the scoring process works
a. State Process
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 8
State Process – Accelerated and Streamlined (without Interviews)
Evaluation Criteria
Statement of Qualifications
(SOQ) Evaluations: CST assigned
Questions and Responses weight %
(Q&R) Template
CST assigned weight %.
Prime Provider’s Past
*Currently from TxDOT’s
Performance Score CCIS Database.
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 9
How the scoring process works
a. State Process with Interviews
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 10State Process – Comprehensive and Streamlined (with Interviews)
Evaluation Criteria
SOQ Evaluations:
CST assigned
Questions and Responses weight %
(Q&R) Template
Prime Provider’s Past CST assigned weight %.
Performance Score *Currently from TxDOT’s
CCIS Database.
(SOQ Phase)
2 Step Process
Short-list based on SOQ scores CST assigned weight %
Interview and Contract Guide for the Interview
(ICG) Evaluation Criterion
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 11How the scoring process works
b. Federal Process
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 12Federal Process
Evaluation Criteria
CST assigned
Proposal Evaluations weight % for
proposal
CST assigned weight %
Prime Provider’s Past
*Currently from TxDOT’s
Performance Score CCIS Database.
Similar to the CST assigned weight %
ICG -
State 2 Step for the Interview
Process
Federal Selection Process Evaluation Criteria
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 13How the scoring criteria is developed 2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 14
Five steps for developing questions/topics
1. Develop goals & characteristics
2. Create questions/topics based on goals
3. Develop scoring criteria for questions/topics
4. Refine questions/topics & scoring criteria
5. Set weightings & length for each response
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 15Develop scoring criteria
Question/Interview Criteria
Does not meet Meets TxDOT Significantly exceeds
requirements requirements requirements
1 2 3 4 5
These responses These are responses that
These are the “wow” factors
indicate that the firm would satisfy the CST that
“CST criteria for the 5’s may
does not meet the the firm is qualified to do
the work be include, but are not
requirements for the
question limited to…” What this
A score of 2 or 4 is also a
scoring option for the CST. means is that the CST may
Based on the scoring criteria have not captured all of the
and the CST’s subject matter “wow” factors
expertise.
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 16Example scoring criteria
Provide an example of a project similar to the project advertised ….
including project details…explanation of unexpected issues…description of
resolution of issues…
Does not meet requirements Meets TxDOT requirements Exceeds TxDOT requirements
1 3 5
Project discussed includes In addition to the items listed in
most of the following: 3, response may include, but is
not limited to the following:
Details
xxx Details
Issues xxx
xxx Issues
Resolution xxx
xxx Resolution
xxx
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 17Example scoring criteria – State Process
Based on your team’s experiences with the advancement of bridge design tools and methodologies, discuss the
pros and cons of these advancements.
Does not meet requirements Meets TxDOT requirements Exceeds TxDOT requirements
1 Pros: 3 5
Design Tools:
Pros:
• Integration
Design Tools:
• Ease of revisions if needed
• Keeping up with specifications/codes is
• Easier to graphically or visually verify input correctness
easier
• Optimization of design
• Design policy implementation
• Help to reduce calculation mistakes
• consistency
Methods:
• 3D visualizations for public
• More accurately captures the behavior of complex structures
Methods:
• Modeling time dependent effects
• Safety/reliability (ASD vs. LRFD)
• Harmonic behavior for cable stay bridges
Cons:
• line element model vs. grillage model vs. FEM
Design Tools:
• stiffness of connections (column to cap)
• Software adaptability to state design
• point of fixity for foundations
preferences
Cons:
• Time and training required for developing
Design Tools:
familiarization
• Non-practical optimization of design
• When a new version comes out - not being
• May not get uniformity of the design of certain elements
able to decipher what changed in the
• Time and training required for developing familiarization
software and how it affects your design
• Not knowing how software is calculating certain elements – “black box”
• Discrepancies in software versions, lack
• Harder to hand check calculations
of backward compatibility
Methods:
Methods
• More complicated code
• Understanding applicability
• LLDFs
• Calculations could be more prone to
• Load combinations
errors due to misinterpretations
• Time of execution –duration (ex. Running a FEM)
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 18Example Interview Criteria – State Process
Interview Criteria Weight
Criterion 1: Solid Understanding of multimodal transportation & potential environmental needs CST assigned weight %
Criterion 2: Well-rounded public involvement and outreach experience CST assigned weight %
Criterion 3: Clear understanding of data collection and reporting CST assigned weight %
Total 100 %
Presentation Topics
Topic 1: The population of Texas is predicted to nearly triple in the next 25 years. Transportation
officials are facing some critical decisions on addressing congestion, mobility, and safety concern
issues. Provide your team’s plan and approach to problem solving solutions that address each of
these 3 areas?
Topic 2: Multimodal planning is an essential part of updating the TTP 2040 Plan. Assume you are
presenting to the following groups: (a) Business executive group in a metropolitan location; (b)
Home Owners association in a suburban community; (c) Small rural town residents; (d) LEP or Low
SES residents in an urban setting.
For each group, provide an explanation of multimodal planning and its importance.
Topic 3: Assume your team has been tasked with created a GIS model to survey and map cultural
resources important to tribes. What challenges and constraints would you anticipate? Outline the
team members you would assign to this project and explain your team’s methodology to
successfully deliver this assignment.
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 19Example Interview Criteria – State Process
Criterion 1: Solid Understanding of multimodal transportation planning and potential environmental needs or
considerations (Topic 1 & any follow up questions)
Does not meet requirements Meets TxDOT requirements Exceeds TxDOT requirements
1 3 5
Response displays sufficient understanding and In addition to items listed under score 3 - response may also
knowledge of most of the following include but is not limited to the following
• Provides an approach to address Congestion, • Approaches provided also:
Mobility, and Safety that: • Recognizes that no one set or number of
performance measures will fit multiple customer
• Can relate project selection to
groups or “market segments” & that performance
performance outcomes.
measures must evolve over time to be effective
• Understands the intricacies • Demonstrates an understanding that performance is
associated with multiple stakeholders not simply defined or measured by planning or
and agencies engineering standards (e.g., cost-benefit, operations
• Identifies and describes multimodal or life-cycle), & must include qualitative
performance-based transportation measurements to account for the user’s
planning issues transportation experience (e.g., desire for shorter
• Understands planning, programming, travel times & mode choice to reduce delays and
and environmental phases. improve experience).
• Identifies issues that could impact the • Acknowledges the difficulties sustaining a
process and provides potential performance measure program with competing
solutions priorities Stresses & understands the collaborative
• Able to provide standard best nature of each piece of the project development
practices to minimize delays process in order to minimize delay.
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 20Example Interview Criteria – State Process
Criterion 2: Well-rounded public involvement and outreach experience (Topic 1, 2 & any follow up questions)
Does not meet requirements Meets TxDOT requirements Exceeds TxDOT requirements
1 3 5
Response displays sufficient understanding and In addition to items listed under score 3 - response may also
knowledge of most of the following include but is not limited to the following
• Describes techniques for the effective • Demonstrates the potential of communicating to audiences
communication of data/information needs at every level through excellent articulation of ideas
and deadlines to ensure timely responses throughout presentation and responses to follow up questions
from our transportation partners and providers • Displays very strong understanding of importance of
communication
• Ability to convey their ideas clearly and
• Exemplifies strong communication skills
effectively based on the audience.
• Established program/technology for sharing time
• Proposes methods of outreach to engage
sensitive/critical information without delay
bilingual and underserved communities and • Describes innovative public involvement techniques to
stakeholders encourage stakeholder participation
• Displays a proactive communicative approach • Discusses the importance of coordination among the team
to mitigate public concerns • Recognizes the effects of issues on various and multiple
• Good communicator (including presentation different tasks
skills) • Recognizes the importance of the Public Involvement
• Handles conflict or pressure with calm and coordination for sensitive issues
focus
• Brainstorming is evident throughout the
development of responses
• Addresses documentation and follow-up
communication methods (meeting minutes…)
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 21Example Interview Criteria – State Process
Criterion 3: Clear understanding of data collection and reporting (Topic 1, 3 & any follow up questions)
Does not meet requirements Meets TxDOT requirements Exceeds TxDOT requirements
1 3 5
Response displays sufficient understanding and In addition to items listed under score 3 - response may also
knowledge of most of the following include but is not limited to the following
• Describes effective methods for building • Provides innovative best practices that go beyond the
professional trust necessary to obtain standards.
proprietary data/information • Demonstrates innovative methods to extract and utilize data.
• Provides customizable tools and reporting.
• Discusses a tool to track project development
• Includes training the user as an important component to
and how to communicate that to internal and
developing the data management tools
external stakeholders. • Team actually developed a management information system
• Demonstrates ability to gather, store, and or added value to an existing system for a transportation
access data. agency
• Demonstrates flexibility in being able to deliver • Team provided continued support for users after
different tools based on client need implementation and initial training
• Identified possible user requirements for a • Describes method(s) for requesting and obtaining
new system and a method to ensure the data/information in multiple formats to accommodate entities
requirements were included in the with limited human resources, technological resources or
implementation technical skills
• Describes or proposes possible techniques
and tools to conduct training that promotes
user-friendly aspects and enhances user skills
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 22Example Criteria – Federal Process
Evaluation Criteria Weight
Technical Approach – project understanding, innovative CST assigned weight %
concepts or alternatives, quality control procedures,
staffing
Project Manager’s Relevant Experience – similar or CST assigned weight %
related projects, project management
Key Staff’s Relevant Experience – similar projects CST assigned weight %
Total 100 %
Presentation Topics
Topic 1: Your firm has been assigned to provide CEI services for an 3 mile highly
urban section on a state highway corridor project. Describe your team’s specific
experience in providing inspection, record keeping, and engineering support at the
highest quality and responsiveness. You will be evaluated against: Technical
Approach, Project Manager’s Relevant Experience, & Key Staff’s relevant
experience.
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 23Example Interview Criteria – Federal Process
Topic 1: Your firm has been assigned to provide CEI services for an 3 mile highly urban section on a state highway
corridor project. Describe your team’s specific experience in providing inspection, record keeping, and engineering
support at the highest quality and responsiveness. You will be evaluated against: Technical Approach, Project
Manager’s Relevant Experience, & Key Staff’s relevant experience.
Does not meet requirements Meets TxDOT requirements Exceeds TxDOT requirements
1 3 5
• PM/Key Staff will attend kickoff meeting (Pre-Con).
• PM/Key Staff to establish protocol with Client to keep • Technical approach shows an
project on time and on budget for decision-making. exceptional or innovative strategy
• PM will keep constant communication with client’s project by the PM for managing the
team. development of the CEI project.
• Inspectors to meet escalation protocol established through • PM is proactive and identifies
the partnering process. issues in a timely manner to
• PM will establish method of communication with district provide recommendations &
(weekly progress reports, issue escalation…) solutions to avoid potential
• Reporting methods to keep records updated issues.
• Regular reporting of testing to keep deficiencies at a • PM keeps client’s leadership
minimum. involved/informed on issues
• Responsiveness of PM in a timely manner to issues that through duration of project.
arise. • Team familiarity with area,
• Key Staff to coordinate with adjacent projects (safety, traffic testing, challenges, and can
control, barricades, closures) present options to best suit the
area
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 24What CST members look for in a
good response
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 25What CST members look for in a good response - SOQ or Proposal
Recommendations
Keep in mind that the CST are subject Take and show project ownership on
matter experts samples provided
Read the Question thoroughly Use your best examples and give credit
Answer the questions being asked to firm that performed work under your
team, as applicable
Focus on readability
Use space wisely
Roles and responsibilities on previous
work need to be clearly identified. Don’t Don’t waste space by marketing
over-generalize Clearly identify the roles of the team
Be clear, concise, specific, and members if asked
technical Consider innovative techniques,
challenges, and lessons learned
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 26What CST members look for in a good response - Interview
Recommendations
Read the ICG thoroughly Focus on technical expertise - not
on marketing material that will not
Focus on the ICG format and
be scored
requirements
Anticipate follow-up questions
Focus on the interview topics
from the CST. These questions are
given in the ICG as well as the
important to clarify and expand on
evaluation criteria and weighting
topics
Focus on the interview delivery
Expect tough competition
Use time wisely
Show team’s leadership between
PM and task leads
2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 27Questions and Discussion 2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 28
Contact Information Raul Ortega, P.E. TxDOT | PEPS Service Center for Divisions (915) 790-4411 Raul.Ortega@txdot.gov 2018 PEPS Conference November 27, 2018 29
Example Scoring Criteria
State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
Example Scoring Criteria (slide #18)
Based on your team’s experiences with the advancement of bridge design tools and methodologies, discuss the pros
and cons of these advancements.
Does not meet
Meets TxDOT Requirements Exceeds TxDOT Requirements
requirements
Pros: Pros:
Design Tools: Design Tools:
• Integration • Keeping up with specifications/codes is
• Ease of revisions if needed easier
• Easier to graphically or visually verify input • Design policy implementation
correctness • Consistency
• Optimization of design • 3D visualizations for public
• Help to reduce calculation mistakes Methods:
Methods: • Safety/reliability (ASD vs. LRFD)
• More accurately captures the behavior of Cons:
complex structures
Design Tools:
• Modeling time dependent effects
• Harmonic behavior for cable stay bridges • Software adaptability to state design
preferences
• Line element model vs. grillage model vs.
FEM • Time and training required for developing
• Stiffness of connections (column to cap) familiarization
• When a new version comes out - not being
• Point of fixity for foundations
able to decipher what changed in the
Cons: software and how it affects your design
Design Tools: • Discrepancies in software versions, lack of
• Non-practical optimization of design backward compatibility
• May not get uniformity of the design of Methods:
certain elements • Understanding applicability
• Time and training required for developing • Calculations could be more prone to errors
familiarization due to misinterpretations
State Procurement Process
• Not knowing how software is calculating
certain elements – “black box”
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference
• Harder | November
to hand 27 – 28, 2018
check calculations
Methods:
• More complicated code
• LLDFs
• Load combinations
• Time of execution –duration (ex. Running a
FEM)
These are ONLY examples and shall not be used, and will not be considered, for future
responses for the solicitation of PEPS procurements.State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
Example Interview Criteria (slide #19)
Interview Criteria Weight
Criterion 1: Solid Understanding of multimodal transportation & potential CST assigned weight %
environmental needs
Criterion 2: Well-rounded public involvement and outreach experience CST assigned weight %
Criterion 3: Clear understanding of data collection and reporting CST assigned weight %
Total 100 %
Presentation Topics
Topic 1: The population of Texas is predicted to nearly triple in the next 25 years. Transportation
officials are facing some critical decisions on addressing congestion, mobility, and safety concern
issues. Provide your team’s plan and approach to problem solving solutions that address each of
these 3 areas?
Topic 2: Multimodal planning is an essential part of updating the TTP 2040 Plan. Assume you are
presenting to the following groups: (a) Business executive group in a metropolitan location; (b) Home
Owners association in a suburban community; (c) Small rural town residents; (d) LEP or Low SES
residents in an urban setting.
For each group, provide an explanation of multimodal planning and its importance.
Topic 3: Assume your team has been tasked with created a GIS model to survey and map cultural
resources important to tribes. What challenges and constraints would you anticipate? Outline the
team members you would assign to this project and explain your team’s methodology to successfully
deliver this assignment.
State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
These are ONLY examples and shall not be used, and will not be considered, for future
responses for the solicitation of PEPS procurements.State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
Example Interview Criteria (slide #20)
Criterion 1: Solid understanding of multimodal transportation planning and potential environmental needs or
considerations (Topic 1 and any follow up questions)
Does not meet
Meets TxDOT Requirements Exceeds TxDOT Requirements
requirements
In addition to items listed under score 3 -
Response displays sufficient understanding and
response may also include but is not limited to
knowledge of most of the following
the following
• Provides an approach to address • Approaches provided also:
Congestion, Mobility, and Safety that: o Recognizes that no one set or
o Can relate project selection to number of performance measures
performance outcomes. will fit multiple customer groups or
o Understands the intricacies “market segments” & that
associated with multiple performance measures must evolve
stakeholders and agencies over time to be effective
o Identifies and describes multimodal o Demonstrates an understanding
performance-based transportation that performance is not simply
planning issues defined or measured by planning or
o Understands planning, engineering standards (e.g., cost-
programming, and environmental benefit, operations or life-cycle), &
phases. must include qualitative
o Identifies issues that could impact measurements to account for the
the process and provides potential user’s transportation experience
solutions (e.g., desire for shorter travel
o Able to provide standard best times& mode choice to reduce
practices to minimize delays delays and improve experience).
o Acknowledges the difficulties
sustaining a performance measure
program with competing priorities
Stresses & understands the
collaborative nature of each piece
of the project development process
in order to minimize delay.
State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
These are ONLY examples and shall not be used, and will not be considered, for future
responses for the solicitation of PEPS procurements.State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
Example Interview Criteria (slide #21)
Criterion 2: Well-rounded public involvement and outreach experience (Topic 1, 2 & any follow up questions)
Does not meet
Meets TxDOT Requirements Exceeds TxDOT Requirements
requirements
In addition to items listed under score 3 -
Response displays sufficient understanding and
response may also include but is not limited to
knowledge of most of the following
the following
• Describes techniques for the effective • Demonstrates the potential of
communication of data/information needs communicating to audiences at every level
and deadlines to ensure timely responses through excellent articulation of ideas
from our transportation partners and throughout presentation and responses to
providers follow up questions
• Ability to convey their ideas clearly and • Displays very strong understanding of
effectively based on the audience. importance of communication
• Proposes methods of outreach to engage • Exemplifies strong communication skills
bilingual and underserved communities and • Established program/technology for sharing
stakeholders time sensitive/critical information without
• Displays a proactive communicative delay
approach to mitigate public concerns • Describes innovative public involvement
• Good communicator (including presentation techniques to encourage stakeholder
skills) participation
• Handles conflict or pressure with calm and • Discusses the importance of coordination
focus among the team
• Brainstorming is evident throughout the • Recognizes the effects of issues on various
development of responses and multiple different tasks
• Addresses documentation and follow-up • Recognizes the importance of the Public
communication methods (meeting Involvement coordination for sensitive
minutes…) issues
State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
These are ONLY examples and shall not be used, and will not be considered, for future
responses for the solicitation of PEPS procurements.State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
Example Interview Criteria (slide #22)
Criterion 3: Clear understanding of data collection and reporting (Topic 1, 3 & any follow up questions)
Does not meet
Meets TxDOT Requirements Exceeds TxDOT Requirements
requirements
In addition to items listed under score 3 -
Response displays sufficient understanding and
response may also include but is not limited to
knowledge of most of the following
the following
• Describes effective methods for building • Provides innovative best practices that go
professional trust necessary to obtain beyond the standards.
proprietary data/information • Demonstrates innovative methods to extract
• Discusses a tool to track project and utilize data.
development and how to communicate that • Provides customizable tools and reporting.
to internal and external stakeholders. • Includes training the user as an important
• Demonstrates ability to gather, store, and component to developing the data
access data. management tools
• Demonstrates flexibility in being able to • Team actually developed a management
deliver different tools based on client need information system or added value to an
• Identified possible user requirements for a existing system for a transportation agency
new system and a method to ensure the • Team provided continued support for users
requirements were included in the after implementation and initial training
implementation • Describes method(s) for requesting and
• Describes or proposes possible techniques obtaining data/information in multiple
and tools to conduct training that promotes formats to accommodate entities with
user-friendly aspects and enhances user limited human resources, technological
skills resources or technical skills
State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
These are ONLY examples and shall not be used, and will not be considered, for future
responses for the solicitation of PEPS procurements.Federal Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
Example Criteria (slide #23)
Evaluation Criteria Weight
Technical Approach – project understanding, innovative concepts or CST assigned weight %
alternatives, quality control procedures, staffing
Project Manager’s Relevant Experience – similar or related projects, project CST assigned weight %
management
Key Staff’s Relevant Experience – similar projects CST assigned weight %
Total 100 %
Presentation Topics
Topic 1: Your firm has been assigned to provide CEI services for an 3 mile highly urban section on a
state highway corridor project. Describe your team’s specific experience in providing inspection,
record keeping, and engineering support at the highest quality and responsiveness. You will be
evaluated against: Technical Approach, Project Manager’s Relevant Experience, & Key Staff’s
relevant experience.
State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
These are ONLY examples and shall not be used, and will not be considered, for future
responses for the solicitation of PEPS procurements.Federal Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
Example Criteria (slide #24)
Topic 1: Your firm has been assigned to provide CEI services for an 3 mile highly urban section on a state highway
corridor project. Describe your team’s specific experience in providing inspection, record keeping, and engineering
support at the highest quality and responsiveness. You will be evaluated against: Technical Approach, Project
Manager’s Relevant Experience, & Key Staff’s relevant experience.
Does not meet
Meets TxDOT Requirements Exceeds TxDOT Requirements
requirements
• PM/Key Staff will attend kickoff meeting • Technical approach shows an exceptional or
(Pre-Con). innovative strategy by the PM for managing
• PM/Key Staff to establish protocol with the development of the CEI project.
Client to keep project on time and on budget • PM is proactive and identifies issues in a
for decision-making. timely manner to provide recommendations
• PM will keep constant communication with & solutions to avoid potential issues.
client’s project team. • PM keeps client’s leadership
• Inspectors to meet escalation protocol involved/informed on issues through
established through the partnering process. duration of project.
• PM will establish method of communication • Team familiarity with area, testing,
with district (weekly progress reports, issue challenges, and can present options to best
escalation…) suit the area
• Reporting methods to keep records updated
• Regular reporting of testing to keep
deficiencies at a minimum.
• Responsiveness of PM in a timely manner to
issues that arise.
• Key Staff to coordinate with adjacent
projects (safety, traffic control, barricades,
closures)
State Procurement Process
PEPS 2nd Annual Conference | November 27 – 28, 2018
These are ONLY examples and shall not be used, and will not be considered, for future
responses for the solicitation of PEPS procurements.You can also read
