Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities

Page created by Jennifer Contreras
 
CONTINUE READING
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
Delivering change
How cities can make the most of
digital connections
Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni
July 2018
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
About Centre for Cities
Centre for Cities is a research and policy institute, dedicated to improving the
economic success of UK cities.

We are a charity that works with cities, business and Whitehall to develop and
implement policy that supports the performance of urban economies. We do this
through impartial research and knowledge exchange.

For more information, please visit www.centreforcities.org/about

About the authors
Simon Jeffrey is Policy Officer at Centre for Cities:
s.jeffrey@centreforcities.org | 020 7803 4325

Lahari Ramuni is a Researcher at Centre for Cities:
l.ramuni@centreforcities.org | 020 7803 4300

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Telefónica UK for the support which made this
research possible.

The authors would also like to thank Be the Business, British Chambers of Commerce,
British Property Federation, City of London, City of London Corporation, City of York
City Council, CityFibre, CTIL, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports,
Future Cities Catapult, Good Things Foundation, Greater London Authority, LB
Hammersmith & Fulham, London First, Milton Keynes Council, Mobile UK, National
Infrastructure Commission, Nesta, Nitrous, Ofcom, PUBLIC, the RSA, Salford City
Council, Tech Nation, TechUK, Transport for London, thinkbroadband and West
Midlands Combined Authority.

Photo attribution:
“Washington Heights [the Bronx, New York]” by Albyn Davis,
Flickr Creative Commons.
“Media City Salford” by Steve Wood, Flickr Creative Commons.

All mistakes are the authors’ own.

Supported by
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
About Telefónica UK
O2 is the commercial brand of Telefónica UK Limited and is the mobile network
operator with the highest customer satisfaction in the UK, according to The Institute
of Customer Service. O2 was also awarded Best Network Coverage in 2018 by
uSwitch. With over 32 million connections to the network, O2 runs 2G, 3G and 4G
services across the UK, as well as operating its nationwide O2 Wifi service. O2
has over 450 retail stores and sponsors The O2, O2 Academy venues and England
Rugby. Read more about O2 at o2.co.uk/news.
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Executive summary

Digital connectivity has played a role in changing the economic, social
and physical fabric of UK cities. Full fibre connections to every home
and 5G coverage will continue this change in some ways we can predict,
and others we cannot. Cities need to prepare their built environment and
human capital to take advantage of this. Cities in the UK and around the
world provide examples of how they are doing both.

Speed up investment in digital infrastructure. Investment in the digital
‘hardware’ of fibre and mobile networks in cities continues to grow as data
demands grow at nearly 50 per cent a year. This densification of fibre and
mobile networks will accelerate towards the introduction of commercial
5G from 2020. Cities need to prepare for this now so that they do not fall
behind their domestic and international counterparts and so they can keep
up with public expectations. This must be done while ensuring that life for
businesses and citizens is not unduly disrupted and any potential economic
and financial gains for cities are maximised.

Cities can take action today to accelerate improvements in digital
infrastructure by reducing unnecessary barriers to investment. York and
the City of London have shown that cities can speed up investment by:

   •    Demonstrating the ambition to be a digitally connected
        city – action is at least as important as strategies. Embedding the
        use of technology to improve the quality of council activities – from
        paying council tax to remotely monitoring potholes — is the best
        signal to investors and the public of the benefits of investment.

   •    Creating an attractive market – working at the city scale to
        create common rules, rather than as individual local authorities,
        makes rollout simpler by avoiding regulation changes along and
        between neighbouring streets.

   •    Making digital access work in new ways — dense fibre and
        mobile networks connecting every building and potentially lamppost
        in a city will likely require new arrangements to enable access to
        many times more sites than current digital networks require. New
        commercial models and the capacity in local authorities to enable
        or deliver new installations, maintenance and upgrades should be
        considered.

                                            1
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

The Government can also play a stronger role in supporting cities to deliver
its ambition for world-class digital connectivity. To do this it should:

    •      Include a requirement for the provision of high-quality
           digital infrastructure – mobile and fixed — in all new
           developments in the forthcoming National Planning Policy
           Framework (NPPF). This will reduce unnecessary disruption,
           costs and delays for residents or firms moving in.
    •      Review the Electronic Communications Code (ECC) after 12
           months and take action if its provisions remain a barrier
           to new investment in digital infrastructure. The ECC has
           significantly reduced rents offered to landowners for hosting new
           mobile masts or cells. Landowners are now much less willing to
           engage with operators looking to install new masts or cells to
           provide the capacity that consumers demand in cities. Network
           operators and the British Property Federation have both called for
           action.
Improve digital skills provision and innovation. Providing infrastructure
is not enough. Evidence suggests that the UK is not making the most of
what is already available. Superfast broadband is available to 94 per cent
of homes in cities, but take-up is 43 per cent. And in the delivery of public
services, take-up of digital innovation varies significantly across cities.
Without action to increase the ability and desire of individuals, businesses
and local authorities to capitalise on the potential of this public and private
investment, then digital and economic divides are likely to widen further.

    •      The national government must devolve the adult education
           budget to metro mayors, as was promised, to allow them to
           support digital skills provision.
    •      Cities and businesses need to take a leading role in Local
           Digital Skills Partnerships (LDSP), helping to coordinate digital
           skills activities across many local stakeholders and ensure that
           evaluation and evidence are central to all interventions
    •      Cities should embrace the opportunity of existing digital
           technology to improve public services by adopting best practice,
           upskilling the public sector workforce and improving procurement.

                                                2
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Introduction

Significant new private investment in fibre and mobile connectivity in cities
is planned over the next five years, backed by the national government’s
ambition to create a ‘world class’ digital infrastructure. While the UK
performs well on current digital connectivity measures compared to other
countries, around the world national governments, cities and network
operators are pushing ahead to build better digital connectivity.

Leadership in 5G is a strategic ambition of the EU, US, Japan and China.1 To
achieve the Government’s ambition it is therefore important for UK cities to
get to grips with this rollout to avoid falling behind international rivals and
deliver improvements in connectivity that citizens and workers will expect.

The rollout of full fibre will be an accelerated continuation of what has
gone before. On mobile, significant upgrades of networks using existing
technologies mean more masts and cells to provide greater 4G mobile
capacity to keep up with mobile data demands which are growing by around
50 per cent a year.2 Cities have long worked with broadband, fibre and
mobile network providers to balance investment, access and public and
private benefit, and this partnership will deepen as these networks densify.

A ‘world class’ digital infrastructure in cities will require a fibre network
connecting every building as well as significantly more 4G — and soon
5G — cells. This could see lampposts connected to fibre networks in order
to host microcells. London alone is expected to require 500,000 cells in
order to offer 5G everywhere.3 This report offers advice and support to
national government and cities on how to manage this significant uptick
in investment in physical infrastructure in a way that is most efficient,
effective and least disruptive for citizens and businesses.

But there are already digital divides in many cities. Citizens and businesses
are yet to fully grasp the economic and social benefits of existing digital
infrastructure. Realising its full potential requires awareness, skills and
confidence.

Cities have already had significant experience working with mobile and fibre
network operators to deal with the growth of fixed connection and greater

1	BEREC (2018) ‘Study on the Implications of 5G Deployment and Future Business Models’
2	Ofcom (2017) ‘ The Communications Market Report 2017’
3	LGA (2017) ‘Facilitating the next generation of mobile connectivity’ https://www.local.gov.uk/our-support/
   our-improvement-offer/case-studies/facilitating-next-generation-mobile-connectivity

                                                      3
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

mobile data capacity. To ensure that this latest wave of investment in digital
infrastructure has the greatest positive impact for people and businesses,
this report will highlight how cities such as London and York are working to
become world class in their utilisation of today’s networks and technology
to improve the management, productivity and inclusiveness of their cities.

This report sets out practical advice to cities and makes recommendations
to the government and businesses on what they can do to improve urban
digital connectivity. The report is split into three sections:

    •      Section one looks at the state of physical and digital infrastructure
           across UK cities.
    •      Section two looks at how to support investment and rollout of the
           hardware that will be required – the fibre connections and dense
           network of cells running into and on top of nearly every building.
    •      Section three looks at what cities can do to ensure that individuals,
           businesses and the public sector are able to take up the potential
           of this hardware.

                                                4
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

                                   01.
        What does digital connectivity
          look like across the UK?

Two strands of digital connectivity infrastructure are most relevant in the
UK urban policy context – fixed and mobile networks (as set out below). The
UK performs well by international standards for the provision of superfast
broadband and 4G mobile coverage, but lags on fibre provision.
Cities, national government and infrastructure firms are all making
significant efforts to support investment in fibre and the improved 4G and
future 5G mobile networks that will rely on it.

         Box 1: Fixed digital networks

   •     Copper – Data sent across existing telephone lines from
         exchanges. Supports broadband.
   •     Fibre to the cabinet (FTTC) – Copper or cable connections into
         homes from nearby fibre-connected cabinets. Supports what
         the Government calls superfast broadband (download speeds
         greater than 24Mbps). Upgrades set to increase speeds
         significantly.
   •     Fibre to the premises (FTTP) – What government calls full fibre
         networks that support speeds of 1Gbps.4

4	(p.4) Kenny, R, (2015) Exploring the costs and benefits of FTTH in the UK, Nesta

                                                       5
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Status check: Fixed connectivity
Today the UK and its cities, in particular, enjoy, by international standards,
cheap and effective fixed broadband (greater than 10Mbps) and mobile
digital connectivity. It ranks 7th out of 28 countries in the EU5 – behind only
Denmark, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Ireland but
above other large countries.

Figure 1: Average download speeds (Mbps)

                                                                                                            Average download
                                                                                                            speed in Mbps, 2017
                                                                                                                      26.4 — 38.0
                                                                                                                      38.1 — 44.9
                                                                                                                      45.0 — 51.8
                                                                                             Aberdeen                 51.9 — 59.6
                                                                                                                      59.7— 67.2
                                                                                   Dundee                             102.9 (York)

                                                                                Edinburgh
                                                  Glasgow

                                                                                                         Sunderland
                                                                                                          Newcastle

                                        Belfast                                                              Middlesbrough

                                                                                Blackburn
                                                                         Preston     Burnley Bradford    York
                                                                   Blackpool                       Leeds
                                                                                      Huddersfield                       Hull
                                                                                                    Wakefield
                                                                            Wigan
                                                                    Liverpool               Barnsley
                                                                Birkenhead                               Sheffield
                                                                                  Manchester
                                                                           Warrington
                                                                                                            Mansfield
                                                                                            Stoke          Nottingham
                                                                                                         Derby
                                                                                       Telford                                                Norwich
                                                                                                             Leicester     Peterborough
                                                                                  Birmingham
                                                                                                       Coventry
                                                                                                                  Northampton
                                                                                                                                 Cambridge
                                                                                                                     Milton Keynes           Ipswich
                                                                                                                         Luton
                                                                                            Gloucester
                                                                                                          Oxford            Basildon
                                                                 Swansea                                       Slough
                                                                              Newport               Swindon                          Southend
                                                                            Cardiff Bristol
                                                                                                              Reading London       Chatham
                                                                                                                  Aldershot
                                                                                                                                Crawley

                                                                                                          Southampton
                                                                                                                             Brighton
                                                                      Exeter Bournemouth               Portsmouth Worthing

                                                            Plymouth

Source: Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations

5	European Commission (2018) The Digital Society and Economy Index

                                                            6
Delivering change How cities can make the most of digital connections Simon Jeffrey and Lahari Ramuni July 2018 - Centre for Cities
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Superfast broadband (greater than 24Mbps) is now available to over 95
per cent of UK homes,6 supported by the Department for Digital, Culture,
Media and Sports (DCMS) through its £1.6bn Broadband Delivery UK
investment programme. Within the UK, average download speeds vary
across cities (figure 1).

More than half (53 per cent)7 of urban addresses can now access fixed
connections faster than 100Mbps, with around 4 out of 5 of these also
able to access speeds of over 300Mbps.8 These are driven by the spread
of fibre to the cabinet (FTTC) found on most city streets before copper or
coaxial connections connect into properties.

The UK lags far behind many other countries on full fibre to the premises
(FTTP), which can deliver download speeds of 1Gbps, with only 3 per cent
covered. 9 BT Openreach has promised to reach 10 million homes by the
mid-2020s.10 Competitors have also announced plans to rollout FTTP to
10 million homes by 2025. Cities have been the natural focus of these
announcements so far, as they offer these firms large markets of consumers
to sell to. Ofcom expects coverage to reach 20 per cent of premises in
2020.11

        Box 2: Fixed connectivity for businesses

        Businesses that need reliable, high-speed internet connections
        have long been able to lease lines from providers. In London,
        where there has been a concentration of firms in finance and
        business services that have required these connections, this
        has matured into a functioning market that offers the most
        affordable full fibre access in the country: 98 per cent of firms
        in Central London are within 100 metres of BT fibre and at least
        three competitors’ networks.12

6	DCMS (2018) ‘Superfast broadband now available to more than 19 out of 20 UK homes and businesses’
    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/superfast-broadband-now-available-to-more-than-19-out-of-20-
    uk-homes-and-businesses
7	Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations 2017
8	Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations 2017
9	Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations 2017
10	‘Openreach Aim FTTP Broadband for 3 Million Premises in 8 UK Cities’ (2018) ISPreview https://www.
    ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2018/02/openreach-aim-fttp-broadband-3-million-premises-8-uk-cities.htm
11	Ofcom (2018) New Ofcom rules to boost full-fibre broadband https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/
    latest/media/media-releases/2018/new-rules-boost-full-fibre
12	Ofcom (2016) Ofcom Business Connectivity Market Review – Volume 1

                                                    7
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Status check: Mobile connectivity
Compared to its European neighbours, the UK performs below average on
4G download speeds, but does better on coverage.13 Mobile connectivity
has improved and expanded rapidly, mostly led by private sector investment.
At the end of 2017, 93.6 per cent of premises in urban areas in the UK had
4G coverage outdoors.14 Indoor 4G coverage in urban areas rose to over 64
per cent in 2017 from 45 per cent the year before,15 and there are now over
50 million 4G mobile subscriptions in the UK16 since 4G’s introduction in
late 2012.

But the quality of coverage varies across networks and between and within
cities, with London having the best and worst speeds depending on the
network.17 At peak times – such as at football stadiums during matches
or at train stations at rush hour – networks slow or reach capacity. Tall
buildings, narrow streets, glass and steel constructions pose problems for
coverage, a particular issue that the City of London is tackling in case
study 2 below.

More masts and cells, more spectrum and smarter data compression can
all help to address this issue. As data demands have grown by almost 50
per cent every year,18 networks have increased the number of cells, each
requiring permission, power, fibre and somewhere for the units to be
attached.

        Box 3: Mobile digital networks

   •    2G – First digital mobile network. Supports text messaging and
        voice calls
   •    3G - Video calling and higher data capacity to support
        mobile internet
   •    4G – Much higher data speeds to enable far more extensive
        and convenient video streaming and gaming on mobile devices
   •    5G – More than 20 times faster than 4G with latency (time it
        takes to send and receive information) a tenth of that of 4G.
        Capacity for more internet-connected devices.

13	https://opensignal.com/blog/2018/02/20/europes-4g-speeds-rise-while-the-rest-of-the-world-stalls/
14	Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations 2017
15 Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations 2017
16 Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations 2017
17	https://opensignal.com/reports/2018/04/uk/state-of-the-mobile-network
18 Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations 2017

                                                   8
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

 What is 5G?

 5G networks offer higher speeds and greater capacity. They
 can improve the user experience of current applications
 and overcome existing network bottlenecks such as at train
 stations at rush hour or major sporting events.

 But 5G also has the potential to be transformative in how
 digital connectivity can be used. While earlier iterations have
 improved connectivity between people, 5G supports far greater
 connectivity between devices on a scale not possible with
 existing technology. These devices are able to communicate
 directly with one another, creating the potential for a far more
 complex but seamless ‘Internet of Things’.

 5G’s greater capacity and lower latency could improve the
 safety and effective traffic capacity of existing road networks
 as vehicles could move in unison and at higher speeds.
 Infrastructure monitoring could be improved by connecting
 more sensors than is possible today, improving maintenance
 and reducing stoppages due to inspections or failures.
 Advanced robotics and 5G could transform manufacturing and
 healthcare as sensitive tasks requiring real-time responses
 and feedback, currently only possible for a human to carry out
 in person, are made possible remotely.

 Why is 5G rollout different?

 The shorter range of the higher frequency radio waves that
 5G uses will require many times more cells in cities than the
 4G network. Each cell must be connected to its own fibre
 and power connection. Building and maintaining this network
 across UK cities would require far greater interactions between
 network and infrastructure operators, landlords and planning
 authorities than for previous rollout of new technology.

                                        9
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

                                 02.
             How can cities speed up
           the rollout of infrastructure?

The main barriers that slow down installation and push up the cost of digital
infrastructure investment have been studied in previous reports.19 Taking
these findings into account, in addition to interviews with different cities,
national government and mobile and fibre network operators, this section
highlights what can be done to encourage and enable investment in digital
infrastructure, organised across three themes:

       1. Improve market conditions – telecoms infrastructure inherently
          requires a large front-end investment and relatively low operating
          costs. There are several steps that could be taken to ease this
          cost or at least mitigate the risk associated with the operation

       2. Make access easier – the process of getting the pipes, the
          masts and the cells in place is time and resource intensive. This
          section highlights the institutional changes that could ease this
          relationship for both local authorities and network operators

       3. Take the initiative, be a testbed or innovator – for cities
          that are ahead of the curve in installing the networks, there is a
          potential opportunity to act as a testbed for upcoming applications
          or models of deployment or ownership of infrastructure

19 Analysis Mason (2017) Lowering barriers to telecoms infrastructure deployment; DCMS (2016) Emerging
findings from the BDUK market test pilots

                                                   10
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Create a more attractive market
The Government has expressed its enthusiasm and extended support to the
rollout of fibre infrastructure across the UK through the Full Fibre Networks
Fund and there is funding yet to be allocated. The private sector has clearly
demonstrated an appetite for investment, as shown by the expansion plans
of firms such as CityFibre and Hyperoptic. Cities are levering their assets
and knowledge to support these and their own ambitions too. York aims
to build on its achievements in harnessing and attracting investment to
become the UK’s first gigabit city where all business and residents will have
access to FTTP.20

There are a number of clear steps cities can take to reduce the associated
cost and risk for investors that would hasten this process and get them
ahead in the line for world-class infrastructure.

       •    Simple as it may seem, it is vital that cities have a clear point
            of contact for firms looking to invest in digital infrastructure.
            Interviews revealed that even local government leads working
            to support digital connectivity have found it difficult to find who
            their appropriate counterpart is in neighbouring authorities. This
            contact should have senior authority or support from the chief
            executive or chief digital officer where these are in place.

       •    Cities should know and lever their existing assets. If there
            are any existing fibre or ducting networks that could be used
            for fibre, then that should be made clear. Traffic light systems,
            CCTV networks and fibre ducting belonging to firms that are no
            longer in operation could all reduce the time and cost of rolling
            out fibre. This core network can then create a potential market for
            affordable extension to other premises.

20	 https://www.york.gov.uk/info/20151/community_innovation/1778/broadband_in_york

                                               11
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

     Box 4: Knowing and levering existing assets

     Bristol City Council has levered its ownership of an unused
     ducting network to underpin its wider Bristol Is Open smart
     city innovation platform. York has similarly leverd its traffic
     light network to rollout fibre (see case study 1 below).

     Ordnance Survey is working with the British Geological Survey
     and Future Cities Catapult on Project Iceberg to help cities
     better understand and share knowledge of underground assets.
     This is intended to help speed up planning decisions and the
     delivery of underground assets such as fibre optic cables.

•      Work at city scale to reduce the complexity of rolling out
       networks in cities. Common planning rules or shared digital
       infrastructure teams lower the costs to infrastructure providers of
       dealing with cities. This allows networks to expand naturally and
       efficiently according to proximity and return on investment rather
       than conform to arbitrary local authority boundaries. Pooling this
       task should also lower costs for individual authorities.
•      Reduce risk for investment by using procurement effectively
       and aggregating demand. Public sector bodies have the budgets
       for long-term digital connectivity contracts and geographic scale
       across their estate to offer fibre network providers an ‘anchor
       network’ to invest in. Working with the private sector, cities could
       coordinate and support attempts to aggregate local demand. The
       third section of this report talks about how procurement can also
       be used to increase the adoption of digital technology.
•      Set out city development plans, showing where new housing,
       commercial and transport infrastructure will go and when. This
       gives investors a clearer idea of the business case for investment in
       a city when planning where to work next.
       Take advantage of the convergence of fibre and mobile
       networks. Mobile network operators need fibre connections to
       provide the data backhaul to and from masts and cells. These will
       proliferate with 5G. Fibre providers such as CityFibre look at mobile
       operators as major customers in addition to commercial and
       residential premises. Support for fixed networks will make cities
       more attractive to investment from mobile operators and
       vice versa.

                                           12
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

 Case study 1: York – Innovative procurement and a culture
 of experimentation

 York has combined innovation in procurement to deliver digital
 connectivity with a council-wide ambition to use digital innovations
 to solve problems, save money and improve services for the public.
 This ambition and action have led to York receiving investment from
 the private sector to rollout FTTP, making it the number one city in the
 UK for average internet speeds. York aims to become the first ‘Gigabit
 city’ and is on course for 70 per cent full fibre coverage by 2019.

 In 2009, York tendered for a new consolidated connectivity platform
 and service. Rather than simply provide internet for council buildings
 and key infrastructure platforms such as traffic lights, the city saw
 the potential in a bid that proposed levering this consolidated
 demand and large contract to install a fibre optic ring. As well as
 fulfilling the original specification, it allowed more of the public sector
 estate – council buildings, libraries, schools, community hubs, traffic
 management and strategic transport hubs – to connect affordably
 and easily to a high-speed network to the benefit of workers and
 consumers. The network has also underpinned a free, high-speed wifi
 network in the city centre.

 In order to offer greater scale in procurement and a more attractive
 tender for bidders, York has a joint Head of ICT, Super Connected
 Cities & Digital Innovation with Harrogate.

 To improve city management, York has installed LoRaWan sensors
 on its roads which record transit data and monitor road temperature.
 This information will allow the council to only grit the roads that need
 it in cold weather conditions, saving time and money and improving
 the service. The city is also in the process of installing moisture and
 temperature sensors in social housing. The aim is to save money and
 improve housing quality for residents. Damp or cold readings are
 flagged for investigation, and maintenance can be carried out before
 problems become harmful, unpleasant or expensive to rectify.

                                       13
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

      This will be more time and cost efficient than an officer carrying out
      inspections in person.

      While 5G will transform the potential for the ‘Internet of Things’ to
      help improve public services, York has shown that applications do not
      need to be expensive or complicated and can be introduced today if
      they are the right solution to a problem.

      This infrastructure investment has been accompanied by simple but
      effective improvements to digital interactions, such as redesigning
      the council website to suit handheld devices and the introduction
      of online applications and payments for council-run services. It is
      estimated that around 5,000 transactions are carried out online
      every month, saving the council around £210k in running costs.

Making access to sites easier
Gaining access to sites within a reasonable time and at a reasonable cost
is cited in interviews – by mobile operators, fibre companies and even
councils supporting them in their work – as one of the biggest stumbling
blocks for rolling out infrastructure.

Better existing arrangements
One of these elements is the variety of wayleaves – a right of way from a
landowner – that require individual consideration and negotiation before
work can begin. Business and network operator frustration in the City
of London led to the creation of a simplified wayleave worked on by all
stakeholders, with the support of DCMS (see case study 2 below).
Cities should:

     •   Promote awareness of the simplified wayleave among
         landowners, businesses and any network operators in their city.
         Organisations such as housing associations and other social
         housing providers should adopt simplified wayleaves.

     •   Ensure simplified wayleaves are uniform across the public
         realm and public estate within cities to reduce unnecessary
         complication, cost and delay. Cities could also work with other
         cities to standardise these arrangements at a larger scale.

                                           14
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Ensure fixed and mobile digital connectivity including ducting
is planned into all new developments. The proposed London Plan
requires this. Plans should provide adequate cells around tall glass and
steel buildings.

Integrate readiness for 5G and full fibre when carrying out street
works such as renewing street lamps, traffic lights and resurfacing roads
or pavements. Over the coming years a ‘dig once’ mindset could avoid
disruption and reduce costs to businesses and the public, as cities make
supporting digital connectivity another aspect of improving the public
realm.

Innovative forms of access
Dense fibre and mobile networks connecting every building and potentially
lamppost require new ways of working, commercial models and capacity in
local authorities to enable or deliver. The costs and novelty of 5G rollout, as
well as the urban and city centre focus, means that cities are well placed
to trial new and different models of deployment and ownership, as has
been seen with fibre networks. Cities have access to a unique range of
sites, including public buildings, land and assets such as bus stops and
traffic lights. Local authorities have already developed new methods of
deployment to take advantage of this.

As part of bidding for the £100 million 5G Urban Connected Communities
Fund,21 some cities have considered how they might lever their particular
assets, future public procurement and the potential demand for fibre and
5G. This can speed up investment in better digital connectivity for residents
and public sector users, while at the same time create a revenue stream
through a publicly owned local fixed and mobile digital infrastructure.

Another deployment method already in use is the private concession model
to deploy small cells on street furniture. Concessions have been agreed in
14 London boroughs, Aberdeen and in the City of London, as discussed in
case study 2. Cities lever the value of their assets in return for free public
wifi and create a revenue stream. This model means that cities deal with
one organisation rather than many, which could reduce the burden on
resources and speed up the rollout of better connectivity.

21	https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/5g-urban-connected-communities-project

                                                15
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

        Case study 2: City of London – keeping up with the global
        standards in connectivity

        The City of London is a key part of London’s standing as a global
        financial centre. As such, the City of London Corporation views it as
        imperative for the Square Mile to maintain its edge across various
        domains – skills, regulation, and infrastructure, including digital
        connectivity.

        The City of London Corporation has placed an emphasis on staying
        up to date on the connectivity technology available right now and
        preparing for the advances yet to come. To this end, the infrastructure
        and the legal framework are being upgraded and adapted to improve
        not just the provision of a network but also access to it.

        On the fixed network side, the City of London’s key achievement has
        been the creation of a standardised wayleaves document.22 Acquiring
        a wayleave from a building owner is consistently cited as a significant
        stumbling block for telecoms operators across the country. The
        corporation partnered with a range of stakeholders to publish the
        standardised wayleave and an accompanying toolkit. The document
        has been downloaded around 2,000 times so far, is championed
        by the Greater London Authority (GLA) for use by other London
        boroughs and Greater Manchester is also introducing a standardised
        wayleave.23

        For mobile connectivity, the City of London adopted a concessions
        model to enable investment in the network. In 2017 it created a 15-
        year contract giving access rights to install and operate small cells on
        street furniture and macro cells on roof spaces of corporate assets
        under open access obligation for other providers. In return, the
        concessionaire will invest to upgrade 4G and WiFi and start delivering
        the 5G network in the Square Mile. The free WiFi network has been
        accessed by 100,000 registered users so far, and the

22	City of London digital infrastructure toolkit: Standardised wayleave
23	https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/.../item_4_-_gm_digital_infrastructure_plan

                                                  16
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

        intensification of the 4G network has started with the installation of
        400 new microcells, which will help prepare the City for 5G.

        CTIL, which is Telefónica and Vodafone’s infrastructure joint venture,
        is the City of London’s partner on the project. It has funded someone
        to sit within the Corporation for two years to coordinate the increased
        work with the highways division that this programme will create. The
        Corporation expects this concession to be revenue-positive.

Act as a testbed
The Government recognises that there will be no single answer to the
effective rollout of better mobile and 5G digital connectivity in cities and
that partnership between operators, cities and business will be important.
The £200 million 5G Testbeds and Trials Programme, one element of
the National Productivity Infrastructure Fund, has so far seen six areas
trial a variety of new use cases of 5G. Around £100 million of this fund
will soon go to one large city in the 5G Urban Connected Communities24
project to test new use cases and infrastructure deployment models. The
Government is set to announce the winning bid Summer 2018 and to have
work underway by early 2019.

Some cities see a clear economic opportunity in getting digital infrastructure
in place now when clear commercial uses are still years away. 5G products
will need to be developed and tested somewhere with this infrastructure
in place, and many applications – connected autonomous vehicles and a
far more advanced Internet of Things – are likely to be targeted towards
making cities work better. Acting as a testbed is viewed as a way to attract
investment and put the cities involved at the front of the line when the
applications do come.

This has been the case for Milton Keynes (see case study 3) which is trialling
autonomous vehicles on its streets today. Helped by funding from the 5G
Testbeds and Trials Programme, Bristol and Bath are looking at how 5G
could impact on tourism, creating more immersive experiences for visitors,
while in Tyne and Wear applications are looking at energy, transport and
health.

Only one city will win the 5G Urban Connected Communities
competition, but all bidding cities should look to pursue any viable
business models for use cases and deployment.

24	DCMS (2018) 5G Testbeds and Trials Programme - Urban Connected Communities Project: Overview

                                                  17
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

 Case study 3: Milton Keynes - using digital connectivity to
 enable new transport solutions

 Milton Keynes has made the decision that it wants to be at the
 forefront of technology, to advance its image as a modern city.
 Leading in 5G is part of this ambition.

 The New Town has grown rapidly into a city since its creation. Its
 heritage has endowed the city with a car-based transport system.
 But as the population grows and the number of jobs in the city centre
 expands, the city’s excellent road network and parking facilities
 cannot expand. This has created pockets of congestion and delay.

 The city cannot quickly or easily change its layout and dispersed
 housing pattern, and this makes conventional public transport
 solutions to congestion such as buses or rail unsustainable in some
 areas, with too few potential riders to fund these services.

 This seemingly intractable problem of supporting economic and
 population growth while also addressing congestion in a city
 where conventional public transport is unsuited has opened up an
 opportunity for trialling innovative solutions. The city hopes that
 autonomous buses or pods would eliminate the cost of drivers
 (although create other costs) and this, combined with demand-led
 services ordered from a smartphone, could make services to collect
 people from less densely populated areas viable.

 The city has attracted in firms that are trialling autonomous vehicles
 today. This fits into a broader range of actions through which the city
 hopes to demonstrate this ambition, such as a city-wide electric car
 charging network. The city has plans for a new university to work with
 businesses to develop technology, levering its existing economic
 strength in this area.

                                       18
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

What is the Government doing?
The Government is working to create a ‘world class’ physical digital network
in a number of ways, set out in its 5G Strategy for the UK. A number of these
policies seem to be, or are likely to be, working on their own terms:

       •     The Government’s Housing White Paper25 sets out a requirement
             for local authorities to include the provision of digital infrastructure
             in planning policy, as does the proposed National Planning Policy
             Framework (MPPF).26 This will be a positive step to support local
             plans if it makes it into legislation.
       •     Broadband Delivery UK’s (BDUK) £1.6 billion superfast
             broadband investment programme is being followed up by a
             £200 million Full Fibre Local Networks challenge fund for
             cities to bid for. Thirteen areas won £95 million in the first round
             in March.27 The winning schemes offer a variety of different
             models for how to support the rollout of fibre across different
             cities. For example, laying fibre along the Blackpool Tramway,
             connecting to a transatlantic cable underwater off the coast of
             Cardiff, or creating long-term contracts for fibre in public buildings
             in Wolverhampton.28
       •     The Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2018 was
             passed to support the rollout of full fibre and 5G. It sees
             communications providers exempted from business rates for five
             years on new fibre installation.

Others have been less successful so far on their own terms. The
Digital Economy Act 2017 introduced reforms to the Electronic
Communications Code (ECC), previously updated in 1984. On the
announcement, DCMS declared the aims of the new Code as to:

       •     Bring down the rents telecoms operators pay to landowners to
             install equipment to be more in line with utilities providers, such
             as gas and water
       •     Make it easier for operators to upgrade and share their equipment
             with other operators to help increase coverage

25	MHCLG (2017) ‘Fixing our broken housing market’
26	p.31 Draft revised National Planning Policy Framework p.31 Draft revised National Planning Policy
    Framework
27	MHCLG (2018) ‘£95 million for local full-fibre broadband projects’ https://www.gov.uk/government/
    news/95-million-for-local-full-fibre-broadband-projects
28	ISPReview (March 14, 2018) ‘Brief Summary of the 13 New UK Full Fibre Local Network Projects’ https://
    www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2018/03/brief-summary-13-new-uk-full-fibre-local-network-projects.html

                                                   19
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

       •     Make it easier for telecoms operators and landowners to resolve
             legal disputes.29

The then DCMS Secretary of State, Matt Hancock MP, had stated that the
code will ‘ help promote investment in new technologies such as 5G, and
give mobile operators more freedom to improve their networks in hard-to-
reach places’30

The new code replaces freely contracted market rents for mast and cell sites
based on the value to network operators with a much lower compensation
level based on the value to the landowner. The Government’s impact
assessment of the ECC had expected it to reduce rents to landowners by
around 40 per cent, or £709 million over 20 years, and lower business rates
by up to £307 million over the same period.31 The greatest absolute cuts will
be in cities where the rent values for mobile mast sites are highest as they
can serve the largest number of customers. The British Property Federation
highlights the case of a site in the City of London with a current rent of
£32,000 per annum that was quoted compensation of £80 per annum
for renewal.32

Landowners also have less flexibility under the new code, required to give
operators 18 months’ notice to remove network infrastructure, a significant
limitation that can delay new commercial or residential developments
that could have wider economic or social benefits. It is unsurprising that
among British Property Federation recommendations to the Government to
improve the code and support the improvement of digital infrastructure, one
is that private landlords should only be approached ‘as a last resort’
if no alternative sites under public ownership can be found.33 At present,
many property owners, rural and urban, are choosing not to engage with
operators to develop new infrastructure until legally compelled to do so.

The code’s full implementation will await the first legal cases between
operators and property owners to be decided. This may not be until 2020
when full commercial 5G networks are expected to be up and running in cities
around the world, and mobile data usage in UK cities will have doubled. In the
short term, it seems that the provisions of the code have unintentionally led
to a temporary pause in much new development and a permanent reluctance
to host new mobile infrastructure among landowners.

29	‘Reforms to boost UK’s digital infrastructure’ (2017) https://www.gov.uk/government/news/reforms-to-
    boost-uks-digital-infrastructure
30	https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/5g-urban-connected-communities-project
31	https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/
    file/524895/ECC_Impact_Assessment.pdf
32	Interview with British Property Federation
33	DCMS (2018) 5G Testbeds and Trials Programme - Urban Connected Communities Project: Overview

                                                   20
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

The Government has launched the Future Telecoms Infrastructure
Review to look into these and other issues affecting rollout, while a Barrier
Busting Task Force is working with stakeholders to overcome any areas
of conflict that might slow down rollout, including problems of co-ordination
or implementation of other government policy.

The High Court in February ruled that the installation of mobile antennae
on poles on top of buildings could not be carried out under permitted
development.34 New, altered or replacement masts allowed under that
order, such as wall mounted antennae, will also now need planning
permission. This is likely to limit the rollout of improved 4G in cities, and the
Government should make it easier for landowners and networks to improve
digital infrastructure where there is agreement.

The Government will need to continue to work with cities to achieve its aims.
But there is more it could do to support investment in digital infrastructure
in cities:

    •      Require provision for high quality fixed and mobile digital
           connectivity in the final NPPF to give greater clarity and
           certainty to local plans as they are brought forward
    •      Review the Electronic Communication Code in December if it
           remains a barrier to improved digital connectivity in the short term
           in cities.

34	http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2018/263.html

                                               21
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Other organisations
Major housing developers and network operators are working together to
deliver fibre and superfast internet into new developments.35 But this is
optional and, in developments of 30 or more homes, requires nine months’
notice before its first use36 for free installation of full fibre. On smaller sites
developers may only get FTTC and have to pay for the installation. In London
over 50 per cent of homes in new postcodes had access to full fibre, but
nationally up to 25 per cent of new builds are not even connected to FTTC.

Full fibre and provision for high-quality mobile connectivity should be
required by the Government in the NPPF and local plans in cities. This
will ensure that the Government’s investment through BDUK to connect
existing properties to fibre will not be required for new developments.

35	https://www.ournetwork.openreach.co.uk/property-developers/site-registration.aspx
36	Or nine months before lifts are commissioned in multi-storey buildings

                                                     22
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

                                  03.
                        What can cities do
                       to improve take-up?

As set out in the section above, cities can work to remove or reduce
unnecessary barriers to new investment and create more attractive
opportunities to build a ‘world class’ digital infrastructure. But the value of
this new ‘hardware’ - and that of the existing digital networks - depends
significantly on the ‘software’ available to it: namely the skills and capacity
that enable individuals, firms, and cities to understand how to use the
hardware to improve their lives, business or city services. The differing
availability of this software across UK cities helps drive digital divides.

Take-up of superfast broadband varies across UK cities. The Government’s
investment helped raise the availability of superfast broadband in UK cities
to 94 per cent by May 2017. While take-up is growing, levels are still low in
some cities: 36 per cent on Merseyside and Greater Manchester and 39 per
cent in Newcastle by the end of 2017.37 Across UK cities, take-up of this
improved connectivity by households was 43 per cent, a take-up gap of 51
per cent. This highlights how the availability of connectivity or technology is
necessary but not sufficient for its take-up.

The take-up gap ranges from over 60 percent in Aberdeen to less than 40
per cent in Crawley. Take up will grow as older contracts expire and new
speeds are available.

37	Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) 2018 : Table of local broadband projects: https://docs.google.com/
    spreadsheets/d/1Hs00bNsyRV1WoOt-fow3rsNXzpcKg26AsOWvk1bvJRk/edit#gid=0

                                                   23
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Figure 2: Gap between availability of superfast broadband and
take-up (percentage points)
                                                                                                        Take-up gap, 2017 (pp)

                                                                                                                  38.5 — 46.2
                                                                                                                  46.3 — 50.6
                                                                                                                  50.7 — 54.1
                                                                                         Aberdeen                 54.2— 56.6
                                                                                                                  56.6 — 60.2
                                                                               Dundee

                                                                            Edinburgh
                                                 Glasgow

                                                                                                     Sunderland
                                                                                                      Newcastle

                                       Belfast                                                           Middlesbrough

                                                                            Blackburn
                                                                      Preston    Burnley Bradford    York
                                                                Blackpool                      Leeds
                                                                                  Huddersfield
                                                                                                Wakefield
                                                                        Wigan
                                                                Liverpool           Barnsley
                                                            Birkenhead                               Sheffield
                                                                               Manchester
                                                                       Warrington
                                                                                                        Mansfield
                                                                                        Stoke          Nottingham
                                                                                                     Derby
                                                                                   Telford                                                Norwich
                                                                                                         Leicester     Peterborough
                                                                              Birmingham
                                                                                                  Coventry
                                                                                                             Northampton
                                                                                                                             Cambridge
                                                                                                                 Milton Keynes           Ipswich
                                                                                                                     Luton
                                                                                        Gloucester
                                                                                                      Oxford            Basildon
                                                             Swansea                                       Slough
                                                                         Newport                Swindon                          Southend
                                                                       Cardiff Bristol
                                                                                                          Reading London       Chatham
                                                                                                              Aldershot
                                                                                                                         Crawley

                                                                                                      Southampton
                                                                                                                         Brighton
                                                                  Exeter Bournemouth              Portsmouth Worthing

                                                           Plymouth

Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations

While there is a clear link between higher download speeds and greater
data consumption up to 40Mbps, consumers with faster connections do
not seem to have higher data usage.38 This indicates that many of those
who subscribe to new super-fast broadband connections are not changing
the way they use the Internet.

38	Ofcom (2017) Connected Nations Data Analysis 4. Fixed broadband networks and services

                                                           24
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

This section looks in two parts at what action cities can take to improve the
take-up of digital technology and innovation:

     •   Tackle the digital skills issue so that individuals and firms
         in cities can take advantage of new technology to increase
         productivity, wages and employment. In addition, this will
         ensure that new technology does not exacerbate existing digital
         exclusion.

     •   Take the lead on digital innovation and upskilling by sharing
         and adopting best practice on the use of new technology to
         improve public services, procurement and open up data to take
         advantage of external expertise and ideas.

Tackle the digital skills issue
Operating at the same level as the local labour markets, cities have an
important role to play in encouraging and facilitating the adoption of digital
tools by local citizens, businesses and within their own organisations by:

     1. Help to coordinate and support existing digital skills
        programmes. The many national programmes and numerous
        private and public sector interventions aimed at improving skills
        more generally, and digital skills in particular, make understanding
        what is needed and available difficult, even for those working in
        this area. Cities have a role to play in improving information for
        people and firms looking to develop new digital skills or increase
        their earnings and understand what is available, and for providers
        to ensure that they are providing those skills.

     2. Tackle digital exclusion. Historically, the benefits have been
        less extensive, and the downsides more pronounced for those
        without the skills to adapt to technological change. Improved
        digital connectivity has made activities such as paying council tax
        or finding out information about city services more convenient for
        those residents with digital skills and less costly for cities. Cities
        have a role to play in supporting those individuals who are digitally
        excluded.

                                           25
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Improve digital skills provision and
co-ordination in cities
Greater digital connectivity, its role in displacing and creating jobs, and the
rapid evolution of what constitutes digital skills have raised the importance
of developing a more effective education and skills system that supports an
ongoing process of life-long learning. Cities have an important role to play
in the functioning of an effective skills system for those demanding and
providing courses or training.

Failure to develop a skills system, including digital skills, that responds to
changing labour market conditions39 will likely deepen economic, social
and spatial divides that have grown over recent decades.

Devolution and flexibility
The Government recognised the importance of cities in skills when
devolution deals for metro mayors included control of the Adult Education
Budget. But these powers have yet to be devolved by the Department for
Education. Mayors Andy Burnham in Greater Manchester and Andy Street
in the West Midlands have made becoming digital hubs central to their
ambitions for their city-region economies. But they are as yet unable to
fully integrate improving adult skills into this vision, ensuring the workforce
has the digital skills to attract technology firms, and adapt to the changing
economy. The Government should devolve the adult education
budget and flexibility over how it is used, as promised.

Information and awareness
Cities can further support digital skills by helping to make sense of the
variety and complexity of provision and demand for these skills across the
city. These informational problems for firms, workers and providers are bad
for local economies.

From an individual’s and business’s point of view, it is difficult to get a clear
picture of the digital skills courses that are on offer locally within a city or
accessible online. Thousands of options ranging from three-year university
degrees to online webinars and two-day courses make it hard to know
what is most appropriate. A lack of knowledge of the skills that certain jobs
require, or the wages they offer, affect individuals’ choices.

39	Nesta is working with DCMS on how this system might work and is involved in the Digital Skills Partnership

                                                     26
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

Providers also suffer from problems of information on the existing and
forecast digital skills gaps in a local economy and the rewards for filling
them. This information would allow them to devise and provide courses that
will best help individuals to develop and retrain and businesses to grow and
respond to the economic impacts of greater digital connectivity.

The importance of this task and the economic and financial costs to
business and the national economy has seen multiple attempts at action
and co-ordination by private and public actors to improve the situation over
recent years, and research into effective digital skills provision from around
the world.40 Business has been involved in various ways with Chambers
of Commerce, Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) and new organisations
such as Be the Business all looking at how to improve digital skills
and productivity.

Cities should use their local knowledge and position as leaders of places
to help overcome these informational problems. Applications to support
this that use open data and user-friendly digital design and accessibility
are being developed, and progress and experience should be shared. In
Doncaster, funded by Innovate through the Open Data Institute, the city is
working with Uscreates to bring the huge range of education and training
data together into one place, presented in a way that aims to help young
people make more informed career decisions.41

Co-ordination and collaboration
To support local co-ordination, the Government is also helping the formation
of Local Digital Skills Partnerships (LDSPs) across the country, made
up of public, private and third sector organisations to better understand
existing provision, gaps and set shared priorities. LEPs (which should match
functional economic areas) are the main local policy partner, and pilot
LDSPs have been launched in Lancashire and Heart of the
South West LEPs.

40	Orlik, J. (2018) Delivering Digital Skills, Nesta
41	http://www.ukauthority.com/data4good/entry/8264/odi-calls-for-more-councils-to-address-open-data

                                                 27
July 2018 • Delivering change: how cities can make the most of digital connections

      Box 5: The Digital Playbook

      A ‘Digital Playbook’ for LDSPs is under development, led by
      the Good Things Foundation, a digital inclusion charity, and
      TechNation, a network for technology entrepreneurs. This
      playbook sets out what local areas should think about when
      setting up a partnership. Rather than working in a limited
      group before publishing a finished document, the playbook
      allows local practitioners to engage and co-create
      the document, taking advantage of dispersed local
      knowledge and experience. Hosted as an open Google
      Docs sheet, contributors from across the country add to
      the living document to highlight best practice and debate
      successful strategies, taking advantage of digital connectivity.

      While not complete, the playbook already offers links to new
      tools under development that will help cities to get started on a
      Local DSP. These include using DWP data to better understand
      skills demand to inform digital skills strategies. It also includes
      sections on different funding sources available and sets out
      the sorts of organisations that should be part of partnerships.

The aim of LDSPs is to reduce duplication in local activities, increase
information and awareness among organisations working to improve
digital skills locally and spread best practice in what works and how
to attract in resources from organisations such as Google Digital Garage,
TSB and Lloyds banks.

If they are to be effective, cities and business should engage fully with
LDSPs, and ensure that digital skills programmes are evaluated and focus
on those that have a clear positive impact for individuals, such as the Per
Scholas programme below.

                                           28
You can also read