Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in Travel Recovery

Page created by Jeanne Hart
 
CONTINUE READING
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 1 of 16

RATING ACTION COMMENTARY

Fitch Takes Rating Actions
on U.S. Large Airports and
Major Hubs Amid
Progression in Travel
Recovery
Tue 03 Aug, 2021 - 4:53 PM ET

Fitch Ratings - Austin - 03 Aug 2021: Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings on the
following large airports and major airline hub facilities and revised the Rating
Outlooks to Stable from Negative:

--Atlanta, GA Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) 'AA-' ratings
on both the senior lien airport general revenue bonds and the airport passenger
facility charge and subordinate lien general revenue bonds;

--Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI) 'A-'
rating on its passenger facility charge revenue bonds issued by the Maryland
Transportation Authority;

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 2 of 16

--Broward County Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, FL (FLL) 'A+'
rating on its airport system revenue bonds;

--Chicago O'Hare International Airport's (ORD) 'A' rating on both the senior lien
revenue bonds and passenger facility charge revenue bonds;

--Chicago Midway International Airport, IL (MDW) 'A' rating on the second-lien
revenue bonds;

--Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport (DFW) (TX) 'A+' rating on the joint
revenue bonds;

--Denver International Airport, CO (DEN) 'AA-' and 'A+' ratings on the senior lien
and subordinate lien general airport revenue bonds;

--Hawaii (State of) Department of Transportation, HI 'A+' and 'A' ratings on the
airport system revenue bonds and certificates of participation;

--Houston Airport System, TX (IAH and HOU) 'A' rating on the subordinate lien
revenue bonds;

--Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) 'AA' and 'AA-' ratings on the senior lien
and subordinate lien revenue bonds, respectively, as well as the 'A' rating to
LAX's related payment obligations;

--Massachusetts Port Authority (BOS) MA 'AA' rating on its revenue bonds;

--Miami-Dade County, Florida's 'A' rating on its aviation revenue bonds

--Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, MN (MSP) 'AA-' and
'A+' ratings on the senior lien and subordinate lien revenue bonds;

--Port of Oakland, CA (OAK) 'A+' and 'A' ratings on the senior lien and
intermediate lien revenue bonds and the 'A' underlying bank bond rating for the
port's commercial paper notes;

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 3 of 16

--San Diego International Airport, CA (SAN) 'AA-' and 'A+' ratings on the senior
lien and subordinate lien revenue bonds, respectively, issued by the San Diego
Regional Airport Authority;

--San Francisco International Airport (SFO) 'A+' rating on the second series
revenue bonds;

--San Jose International Airport, CA (SJC) 'A' and 'A-' ratings on the senior lien
airport revenue bonds and underlying subordinate lien bank bonds;

--Tampa International Airport, FL (TPA) 'AA-' and 'A+' ratings on the senior lien
and subordinate lien airport revenue bonds, respectively, issued by Hillsborough
County Aviation Authority.

The above rating affirmations and Outlook revisions to Stable reflect the
diminished operational and financial risks that have challenged airports since
early 2020 due to a combination of improving passenger volumes in recent
months, the effective management oversight of budgets, and the financial relief
accommodated by federal aid that appear to mitigate revenue impairments.
While exposures remain with regard to traffic and revenue improvement, the
progress suggests lessened fiscal strains, with airports better positioned to
restore metrics to levels consistent with current rating levels.

The outbreak of coronavirus and related government containment measures
worldwide created unprecedented disruptions for air travel affecting all airport
types. The rapid progress of vaccination deployment across the country has more
recently brought U.S. airport traffic levels, using daily reported TSA screenings, to
75%-80% of 2019 levels, and Fitch believes there are reasonable expectations for
a continuation of the current recovery trajectory through the rest of 2021 and
beyond. On July 21, 2021, Fitch issued a report detailing the revisions to the
forward-looking U.S. air traffic assumptions due to the strong rebound in
domestic air travel driven by increased U.S. vaccinations and a surge in U.S.
leisure air traffic. Travel volumes are expected to see additional growth in 2H21
and beyond, as business and international travel climbs from pandemic lows.

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 4 of 16

For each of the above credits, Fitch conducted individual reviews of traffic
activity and operational levels through the midpoint period of this calendar year.
Given the distinction of roles across these airports, ranging from international
gateways to domestic regional facilities, the recovery range is still wide but all
trending favorably. Each of the above airports benefit from its favorable
franchise strength serving large air trade service areas to support
origination/destination demand, and in some cases, these facilities have strong
hubbing operations or are well-anchored international gateways.

Fitch also reviewed each airport's financial positioning including the status of its
primary operating agreements with airlines and concession tenants, capital
program developments and their individual allocations of federal relief funds and
planned uses. In Fitch's view, the key credit metrics such as leverage, coverage
levels, liquidity, and airline costs should trend towards pre-pandemic
expectations over the next two to three years.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

No key rating drivers were changed as part of this review. See links below to
individual issuer Rating Action Commentaries with individual Key Rating Driver
assessment scores and analysis.

Links to last published issuer RACs with Key Rating Driver assessments covered
in the above rating actions:

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-atlanta-ga-airport-sr-revs-aa-affirms-pfc-airport-sub-revs-22-09-2020

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
affirms-maryland-transport-auth-pfc-revs-bwi-marshall-airport-at-a-outlook-
negative-16-04-2021

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-rates-broward-
county-fl-airport-revs-a-outlook-stable-15-10-2019

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 5 of 16

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
affirms-chicago-midway-airport-il-second-lien-revs-at-a-outlook-negative-03-
03-2021

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-chicago-o-hare-il-airport-rev-bonds-a-outlook-negative-15-09-2020

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-chicago-o-hare-il-airport-rev-bonds-at-a-outlook-negative-10-09-2020

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-dallas-fort-worth-airport-tx-taxable-joint-rev-bonds-at-a-outlook-
negative-20-07-2020

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-denver-airport-co-2020-a-b-c-revs-aa-2020-d-sub-lien-a-outlook-
negative-06-10-2020

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-hawaii-airport-revenue-bonds-a-affirms-outstanding-outlook-negative-
30-09-2020

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
affirms-hillsborough-co-aviation-auth-sr-airport-revs-at-aa-sub-revs-at-a-24-
02-2021

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
affirms-houston-airport-tx-sub-lien-revs-at-a-outlook-remains-positive-24-05-
2019

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
assigns-lax-apt-ca-sub-rev-bonds-at-aa-affirms-outstanding-rtgs-outlook-
negative-11-01-2021

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 6 of 16

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-massport-series-2021d-e-revenue-bonds-aa-outlook-negative-02-03-
2021

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-miami-dade-county-fl-aviation-revs-a-outlook-negative-18-11-2020

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-minneapolis-st-paul-airport-sub-revs-a-outlook-stable-16-08-2019

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-port-of-oakland-ca-sr-int-rev-refunding-bonds-05-11-2020

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-san-diego-airport-auth-ca-sub-revs-a-upgrades-sr-bonds-to-aa-07-11-
2019

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-san-francisco-international-airport-ca-revs-a-outlook-negative-25-03-
2021

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/infrastructure-project-finance/fitch-
rates-san-jose-ca-senior-airport-revenue-bonds-a-outlook-negative-15-03-2021

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating
action/upgrade:

--Positive rating action is not expected in the near future as forward-looking key
metrics are still progressing to levels anticipated prior to the pandemic where
normal air traffic patterns should stabilize airport finances.

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 7 of 16

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating
action/downgrade:

--Persistent adverse developments to air travel that present further challenges to
stabilize the finances of the affected airports;

--Further credit erosion of the major air carriers or payment delinquencies to the
airports;

--Sustained deterioration in airport liquidity levels.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

Ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case
rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions,
measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of three
notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-
case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more
information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings click here.

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY
DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the
Applicable Criteria.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 8 of 16

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit
relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a
minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which
they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG
Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg

                                   RATING ACTIONS
                                                                                    
 ENTITY/DEBT                  RATING                                           PRIOR

 Broward County (FL)
 [Airport]

 •   Broward County           LT    A+ Rating Outlook Stable     Affirmed      A+ Ra
     (FL) /Airport                                                             Outloo
     Revenues/1 LT                                                             Negat

 San
 Francisco (City & County)
 Airport Commission (CA)
 [Airport]

 •   San Francisco (City &    LT    A+ Rating Outlook Stable     Affirmed      A+ Ra
     County) Airport                                                           Outloo
     Commission                                                                Negat
     (CA) /Airport
     Revenues/1 LT                                                                  
VIEW ADDITIONAL RATING DETAILS

FITCH RATINGS ANALYSTS

Jeffrey Lack
Director
Primary Rating Analyst
+1 312 368 3171
jeffrey.lack@fitchratings.com

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression in ... Page 9 of 16

Fitch Ratings, Inc.
2600 Via Fortuna, Suite 330 Austin, TX 78746

Jennie Mu
Associate Director
Primary Rating Analyst
+1 646 582 4748
jennie.mu@fitchratings.com
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower 300 W. 57th Street New York, NY 10019

Scott Monroe, CFA
Senior Director
Primary Rating Analyst
+1 415 732 5618
scott.monroe@fitchratings.com
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
One Post Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104

Thomas Kunkel
Analyst
Primary Rating Analyst
+1 312 606 2378
thomas.kunkel@fitchratings.com
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
One North Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606

Victoria Babcock
Senior Analyst
Primary Rating Analyst
+1 646 582 4608
victoria.babcock@fitchratings.com
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower 300 W. 57th Street New York, NY 10019

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression ... Page 10 of 16

Seth Lehman
Senior Director
Primary Rating Analyst
+1 212 908 0755
seth.lehman@fitchratings.com
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower 300 W. 57th Street New York, NY 10019

Henry Flynn
Director
Primary Rating Analyst
+1 646 582 4580
henry.flynn@fitchratings.com
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower 300 W. 57th Street New York, NY 10019

Charly Missirian
Associate Director
Primary Rating Analyst
+1 646 582 4834
charly.missirian@fitchratings.com
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower 300 W. 57th Street New York, NY 10019

Victoria Babcock
Senior Analyst
Secondary Rating Analyst
+1 646 582 4608
victoria.babcock@fitchratings.com

Jeffrey Lack
Director
Secondary Rating Analyst
+1 312 368 3171
jeffrey.lack@fitchratings.com

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression ... Page 11 of 16

Seth Lehman
Senior Director
Secondary Rating Analyst
+1 212 908 0755
seth.lehman@fitchratings.com

Aysha Seedat
Analyst
Secondary Rating Analyst
+1 646 582 4278
aysha.seedat@fitchratings.com

Jim Code
Senior Analyst
Secondary Rating Analyst
+1 312 368 3194
jim.code@fitchratings.com

Scott Monroe, CFA
Senior Director
Secondary Rating Analyst
+1 415 732 5618
scott.monroe@fitchratings.com

Emma Griffith
Senior Director
Committee Chairperson
+1 212 908 9124
emma.griffith@fitchratings.com

MEDIA CONTACTS

Sandro Scenga
New York
+1 212 908 0278
sandro.scenga@thefitchgroup.com

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression ... Page 12 of 16

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

PARTICIPATION STATUS

The rated entity (and/or its agents) or, in the case of structured finance, one or
more of the transaction parties participated in the rating process except that the
following issuer(s), if any, did not participate in the rating process, or provide
additional information, beyond the issuer’s available public disclosure.

APPLICABLE CRITERIA

Infrastructure and Project Finance Rating Criteria (pub. 24 Mar 2020) (including
rating assumption sensitivity)
Airports Rating Criteria (pub. 22 Oct 2020) (including rating assumption
sensitivity)

APPLICABLE MODELS

Numbers in parentheses accompanying applicable model(s) contain hyperlinks to
criteria providing description of model(s).

GIG AST Model, v1.1.0 (1)

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Solicitation Status
Endorsement Policy

ENDORSEMENT STATUS

Atlanta (GA)                                                     EU Endorsed, UK En
                                                                                     
Maryland Transportation Authority (MD)                           EU Endorsed, UK En
Broward County (FL)                                              EU Endorsed, UK En
Chicago (IL)                                                     EU Endorsed, UK En
Chicago (IL)                                                     EU Endorsed, UK En
Dallas-Fort Worth (TX)                                           EU Endorsed, UK En
Denver (City & County) (CO)                                      EU Endorsed, UK En
H ii S        f (HI)                                            EU E d         E
                                                                             d UK

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression ... Page 13 of 16

                                                                              
DISCLAIMER

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND
DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY
FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN
ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/RATING-
DEFINITIONS-DOCUMENT DETAILS FITCH'S RATING DEFINITIONS FOR
EACH RATING SCALE AND RATING CATEGORIES, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS
RELATING TO DEFAULT. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND
METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S
CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST,
AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT
SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT
INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT
HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE
PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS
RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR WHICH THE LEAD
ANALYST IS BASED IN AN ESMA- OR FCA-REGISTERED FITCH RATINGS
COMPANY (OR BRANCH OF SUCH A COMPANY) CAN BE FOUND ON THE
ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH RATINGS
WEBSITE.

READ LESS

COPYRIGHT

Copyright © 2021 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33
Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500.
Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is
prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its
ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies
on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other
sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of
the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression ... Page 14 of 16

methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from
independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security
or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the
scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature
of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the
jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is
located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the
management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-
party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters,
appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other
reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent
third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the
particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's
ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual
investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the
information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate
and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the
accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering
documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely
on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial
statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings
and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking
and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their
nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current
facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that
were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or
warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or
any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report.
A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion
and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies
that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports
are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals,
is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk
of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically
mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression ... Page 15 of 16

reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were
involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The
individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating
is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified
and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale
of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any
reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of
any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.
Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any
security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of
payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers,
insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such
fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency
equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues
issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or
guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000
to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment,
publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by
Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement
filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets
Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular
jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and
distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three
days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd
holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which
authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings
information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are
retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While
certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form
NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO
(see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating
subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore
credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO.

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
Fitch Takes Rating Actions on U.S. Large Airports and Major Hubs Amid Progression ... Page 16 of 16

However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings
issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.

READ LESS

SOLICITATION STATUS

The ratings above were solicited and assigned or maintained by Fitch at the
request of the rated entity/issuer or a related third party. Any exceptions follow
below.

ENDORSEMENT POLICY

Fitch’s international credit ratings produced outside the EU or the UK, as the case
may be, are endorsed for use by regulated entities within the EU or the UK,
respectively, for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU CRA
Regulation or the UK Credit Rating Agencies (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit)
Regulations 2019, as the case may be. Fitch’s approach to endorsement in the EU
and the UK can be found on Fitch’s Regulatory Affairs page on Fitch’s website.
The endorsement status of international credit ratings is provided within the
entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for
structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are
updated on a daily basis.

 Industrials and Transportation   US Public Finance

 Infrastructure and Project Finance   North America    United States

https://www.fitchratings.com/research/us-public-finance/fitch-takes-rating-actions-on-us-lar... 8/3/2021
You can also read